This issue has sat incomplete for over nine years without any follow-up
to comment #8. There have been many changes in Ubuntu since that time
including moving on from using the Software Center.
Closing as "Invalid" in order to tidy the list of Papercut tasks.
** Changed in: hundredpapercuts
** Changed in: hundredpapercuts
Milestone: precise-8-softwarecenter-app-descriptions =
quantal-3-software-centre-app-metadata
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/606048
Title:
All
** Changed in: hundredpapercuts
Milestone: nt10-sc-metadata = precise-8-softwarecenter-app-descriptions
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/606048
Title:
All PDF Viewers/Editors
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: New = Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/606048
Title:
All PDF Viewers/Editors aren't in the same category.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Maybe assigning the bug to each of the packages affected would made the
people in charge of them be aware of this.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/606048
Title:
All PDF
I mean using the Also affects project option instead of filling new
bugs
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/606048
Title:
All PDF Viewers/Editors aren't in the same category.
--
Before that happens, someone actually needs to research the apps to
see what is in the wrong category according to the Software Center
rules and the FreeDesktop Standard. Metabugs where apps really aren't
affected just annoy a lot of people with bugspam.
On 12/28/2010 05:23 AM, shankao wrote:
The problem is that not all of these applications are equivalent. Some
of these are PDF editors and some are just readers. There should be
guidelines somewhere as to which category to put each app into.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: Invalid = New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/606048
Title:
All PDF Viewers/Editors aren't in the same category.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Changed status as requested
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/606048
Title:
All PDF Viewers/Editors aren't in the same category.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: New = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/606048
Title:
All PDF Viewers/Editors aren't in the same category.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
** Changed in: hundredpapercuts
Milestone: maverick-round-9-sc-metadata = nt10-sc-metadata
--
All PDF Viewers/Editors aren't in the same category.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/606048
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Actually; I think it's a bug in Software Center because the categories
are confusing:
They are 3 categories where it's more or less logic to put pdf's
editors:
Graphics/Visualisation
Graphics/Numerisation
Office
This makes that all the developpers doesn't choose the same category for
their
13 matches
Mail list logo
