Please note that we ship release branches, not trunk.
I think we should better fix smplayer to not be that confused instead.
Then it's still smplayer issue?
** Changed in: smplayer (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid = New
** Summary changed:
- smplayer outdated in lucid
+ SMPlayer can't correct
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 21:24:42 (EDT), Maia Kozheva wrote:
The bug here is that mplayer in Ubuntu reports the version number in a
different format from the upstream mplayer, confusing smplayer and
making it think mplayer is outdated.
what would be a better format?
please note that we ship
Reassigned to mplayer for now.
** Also affects: mplayer (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: smplayer (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
--
smplayer outdated in lucid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/606607
You received this bug notification because you are a
what's the problem with smplayer and mplayer not reporting the same
version?
smplayer is a frontend to mplayer and is developed pretty much
independently. So this is not exactly suprising to me
--
smplayer outdated in lucid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/606607
You received this bug
The bug here is that mplayer in Ubuntu reports the version number in a
different format from the upstream mplayer, confusing smplayer and
making it think mplayer is outdated.
--
smplayer outdated in lucid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/606607
You received this bug notification because you are a
Actually the mplayer build in lucid is not obsolete, but it seems the
ubuntu developers changed the mplayer identification string and smplayer
fails to recognize the mplayer version.
smplayer expects something like this:
MPlayer SVN-r31037-3.3.4 (C) 2000-2010 MPlayer Team
I think the mplayer
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This bug did not have a package associated with it, which
is important for ensuring that it gets looked at by the proper
developers. You can learn more about finding the right package at
