[Expired for linux (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60
days.]
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/629358
mlx, thank you for providing the requested information. Could you please
test http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v3.7-rc4-raring/ ?
** Tags removed: kernel-bug-exists-upstream-v3.7-rc3-raring
** Tags added: kernel-bug-exists-upstream-v3.7-rc3
** Tags removed:
** Attachment added: dmidecode.log
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/629358/+attachment/3421469/+files/dmidecode.log
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/629358
Title:
** Attachment added: DSDT.dsl
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/629358/+attachment/3421466/+files/DSDT.dsl
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/629358
Title:
** Attachment added: video
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/629358/+attachment/3421468/+files/video
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/629358
Title:
[Fujitsu
** Attachment added: acpi
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/629358/+attachment/3421465/+files/acpi
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/629358
Title:
[Fujitsu
** Attachment added: backlight
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/629358/+attachment/3421464/+files/backlight
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/629358
Title:
** Attachment added: fwts results
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/629358/+attachment/3421467/+files/results.log
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/629358
Title:
I'll reboot to try the acpi=vendor trick and report on that in a while.
** Attachment added: version
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/629358/+attachment/3421500/+files/version
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Using the acpi_backlight=vendor boot option fixes the button behaviour
** Attachment added: vendorbacklight
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/629358/+attachment/3421586/+files/vendorbacklight
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
Oh, btw - with the vendor boot option, I can no longer change the
brightness using KDE's power management widget.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/629358
Title:
[Fujitsu ESPRIMO Mobile
Writing 8 to the brightness file errors out with Invalid argument.
According to max_brightness, highest value is 1. Writing either 0 or 1
into the brightness file does not change the physical backlight
brightness level.
** Attachment added: lslabacklight
With the video.use_bios... parameter set to 0, the backlight keys are as broken
as with stock configuration.
Chris, should I boot the kernel with only atkbd.softraw=0 option, or with
both atkbd.. and video.use_bios..?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
mlx, only:
atkbd.softraw=0
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/629358
Title:
[Fujitsu ESPRIMO Mobile U9200] Incorrect response to Brightness
Up/Down keys
To manage notifications about
The key codes with atkbd.softraw=0 are the same as posted in the
summary:
# single brightness-down
0xe0 0x4c 0xe0 0xcc
#single brighness-up
0xe0 0x54 0xe0 0xd4 0xe0 0x4c 0xe0 0xcc
When the brightness level is at either extreme, the key, which can no
longer change the brightness does not produce
** Tags removed: kernel-fixed-upstream-v3.7-rc3-raring
** Tags added: kernel-bug-exists-upstream-v3.7-rc3-raring
** Tags removed: kernel-fs
** Description changed:
1) Kubuntu maverick beta
2) 2.6.35.19.20 0
3) Pressing the brightness keys should increase/decrease the brightness by 1
step
Yes, just booted a live session of 10.04.4 and it behaves the same way.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/629358
Title:
[Fujitsu ESPRIMO Mobile U9200] Incorrect response to Brightness
mlx, thank you for testing Lucid. Could you please provide the
information following https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/Debugging/Backlight
?
** Tags added: lucid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
18 matches
Mail list logo
