[Bug 632051] Re: slapd dist-upgrade chown: invalid argument: `'

2010-09-07 Thread Marc Deslauriers
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a regular (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross

[Bug 632051] Re: slapd dist-upgrade chown: invalid argument: `'

2010-09-07 Thread mike Bernson
This is a security problem because it stop an package which has security problems from being updated. Package: slapd (2.4.15-1ubuntu3.1) [security] from package changelog: openldap (2.4.15-1ubuntu3.1) jaunty-security; urgency=low * SECURITY UPDATE: null ptr deref, free uninitialized data in

[Bug 632051] Re: slapd dist-upgrade chown: invalid argument: `'

2010-09-07 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
I wonder if the cause of this chown error is at all related to the one discussed in bug #450645 If you can post the output of the following commands it might provide enough information to figure out what exactly is triggering the bug: $ sudo sh -c ls -l

[Bug 632051] Re: slapd dist-upgrade chown: invalid argument: `'

2010-09-07 Thread mike Bernson
ba...@work-isp:~$ sudo sh -c ls -l /etc/ldap/slapd.d/cn=config/olcDatabase* ls: cannot access /etc/ldap/slapd.d/cn=config/olcDatabase*: No such file or directory ba...@work-isp:~$ sudo sh -c grep olcSuffix: /etc/ldap/slapd.d/cn=config/olcDatabase* grep: /etc/ldap/slapd.d/cn=config/olcDatabase*:

[Bug 632051] Re: slapd dist-upgrade chown: invalid argument: `'

2010-09-07 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
Ah, okay, you are still using the slapd.conf file, rather than the slapd.d configuration directory, so your error and the one in #450645 are more like cousins than siblings :) # Backend specific directives apply to this backend until another # 'backend' directive occurs database hdb suffix

[Bug 632051] Re: slapd dist-upgrade chown: invalid argument: `'

2010-09-07 Thread Mathias Gug
** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Low ** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- slapd dist-upgrade chown: invalid argument: `' https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/632051 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server

[Bug 632051] Re: slapd dist-upgrade chown: invalid argument: `'

2010-09-07 Thread mike Bernson
changing suffix dc=domain to suffix dc=domain fixed the problem. Not sure why nothing in ldap/slapd thinks this is a problem but thing look to be working. -- slapd dist-upgrade chown: invalid argument: `' https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/632051 You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 632051] Re: slapd dist-upgrade chown: invalid argument: `'

2010-09-07 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
It occured to me that when the postinst script is unable to determine the database directory associated with a particular suffix (for whatever reason), simply producing the error message chown: invalid argument: `' and then aborting isn't very helpful to the system administrator. Here's a patch

[Bug 632051] Re: slapd dist-upgrade chown: invalid argument: `'

2010-09-07 Thread Marc Deslauriers
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a regular (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross

[Bug 632051] Re: slapd dist-upgrade chown: invalid argument: `'

2010-09-07 Thread mike Bernson
This is a security problem because it stop an package which has security problems from being updated. Package: slapd (2.4.15-1ubuntu3.1) [security] from package changelog: openldap (2.4.15-1ubuntu3.1) jaunty-security; urgency=low * SECURITY UPDATE: null ptr deref, free uninitialized data in

[Bug 632051] Re: slapd dist-upgrade chown: invalid argument: `'

2010-09-07 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
I wonder if the cause of this chown error is at all related to the one discussed in bug #450645 If you can post the output of the following commands it might provide enough information to figure out what exactly is triggering the bug: $ sudo sh -c ls -l

[Bug 632051] Re: slapd dist-upgrade chown: invalid argument: `'

2010-09-07 Thread mike Bernson
ba...@work-isp:~$ sudo sh -c ls -l /etc/ldap/slapd.d/cn=config/olcDatabase* ls: cannot access /etc/ldap/slapd.d/cn=config/olcDatabase*: No such file or directory ba...@work-isp:~$ sudo sh -c grep olcSuffix: /etc/ldap/slapd.d/cn=config/olcDatabase* grep: /etc/ldap/slapd.d/cn=config/olcDatabase*:

[Bug 632051] Re: slapd dist-upgrade chown: invalid argument: `'

2010-09-07 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
Ah, okay, you are still using the slapd.conf file, rather than the slapd.d configuration directory, so your error and the one in #450645 are more like cousins than siblings :) # Backend specific directives apply to this backend until another # 'backend' directive occurs database hdb suffix

[Bug 632051] Re: slapd dist-upgrade chown: invalid argument: `'

2010-09-07 Thread Mathias Gug
** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Low ** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- slapd dist-upgrade chown: invalid argument: `' https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/632051 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 632051] Re: slapd dist-upgrade chown: invalid argument: `'

2010-09-07 Thread mike Bernson
changing suffix dc=domain to suffix dc=domain fixed the problem. Not sure why nothing in ldap/slapd thinks this is a problem but thing look to be working. -- slapd dist-upgrade chown: invalid argument: `' https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/632051 You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 632051] Re: slapd dist-upgrade chown: invalid argument: `'

2010-09-07 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
It occured to me that when the postinst script is unable to determine the database directory associated with a particular suffix (for whatever reason), simply producing the error message chown: invalid argument: `' and then aborting isn't very helpful to the system administrator. Here's a patch