Fix Released (bug #64404).
** Changed in: xmoto (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Fix Released
--
UVF exception request: xmoto 0.2.2-1
https://launchpad.net/bugs/63964
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Adri2000: will you subscribe to Bug reports about it and make sure that
possible problems are fixed/forwarded upstream?
--
UVF exception request: xmoto 0.2.2-1
https://launchpad.net/bugs/63964
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Yeah no problem.
I will subscribe to xmoto bug reports right now :)
--
UVF exception request: xmoto 0.2.2-1
https://launchpad.net/bugs/63964
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Thanks a lot - go ahead then.
** Changed in: xmoto (Ubuntu)
Assignee: MOTU UVF Team = Adri2000
Status: Unconfirmed = Confirmed
--
UVF exception request: xmoto 0.2.2-1
https://launchpad.net/bugs/63964
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
** Attachment added: diffstat.txt
http://librarian.launchpad.net/4659656/diffstat.txt
--
UVF exception request: xmoto 0.2.2-1
https://launchpad.net/bugs/63964
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
** Attachment added: changelog.diff
http://librarian.launchpad.net/4659657/changelog.diff
--
UVF exception request: xmoto 0.2.2-1
https://launchpad.net/bugs/63964
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
** Attachment added: xmoto_0.2.2-1_i386.build
http://librarian.launchpad.net/4659658/xmoto_0.2.2-1_i386.build
** Changed in: xmoto (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = MOTU UVF Team
--
UVF exception request: xmoto 0.2.2-1
https://launchpad.net/bugs/63964
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Hum, not sure about this one:
+ * IMPORTANT: People with big-endian CPUs (PowerPC, etc) should clean their
+ level cache when upgrading; that is, the first time you start the game,
+ use the -cleancache command-line argument. Alternatively delete all files
+ in your LCache/ directory.
do we
Hm. the package is really new in debian unstable (uploaded yesterday).
The diffstat and adri's report look ok to me.
The concern about the LCache/ directory, hm. Well, I think that's an
upstream decision. If we don't do that for edgy, we'll do it for edgy+1
--
UVF exception request: xmoto
