[Bug 65995] Re: Mistakes in libvisual strings

2010-04-11 Thread Brandon Holtsclaw
** Changed in: libvisual (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress = Invalid ** Changed in: libvisual (Ubuntu) Assignee: Brandon Holtsclaw (imbrandon) = (unassigned) -- Mistakes in libvisual strings https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/65995 You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 65995] Re: Mistakes in libvisual strings

2009-02-21 Thread Josh Holland
Applied the patch and turned it into a debdiff (attached) ** Attachment added: libvisual_0.4.0-2.1+build2.debdiff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22948251/libvisual_0.4.0-2.1%2Bbuild2.debdiff -- Mistakes in libvisual strings https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/65995 You received this bug

[Bug 65995] Re: Mistakes in libvisual strings

2008-06-26 Thread PaulSchulz
** Changed in: libvisual (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- Mistakes in libvisual strings https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/65995 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 65995] Re: Mistakes in libvisual strings

2008-06-26 Thread James Westby
** Changed in: libvisual (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Low Status: Confirmed = New -- Mistakes in libvisual strings https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/65995 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 65995] Re: Mistakes in libvisual strings

2008-06-26 Thread Sarah Hobbs
Brandon is going to push this to debian. ** Changed in: libvisual (Ubuntu) Importance: Low = Undecided Assignee: (unassigned) = Brandon Holtsclaw (imbrandon) Status: New = In Progress -- Mistakes in libvisual strings https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/65995 You received this bug

[Bug 65995] Re: Mistakes in libvisual strings

2008-06-26 Thread Brian Murray
** Tags added: string-fix -- Mistakes in libvisual strings https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/65995 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 65995] Re: Mistakes in libvisual strings

2008-05-18 Thread Malcolm Parsons
wouldn't it be better to send the path upstream? -- Mistakes in libvisual strings https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/65995 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 65995] Re: Mistakes in libvisual strings

2008-05-18 Thread DarkMageZ
In theory Yes, in practice No... Upstream is dead (libvisual, not debian). They're looking for a new maintainer tho, if anyone is interested can demonstrate the ability to maintain libvisual then feel free to give synap on irc.freenode.net a poke with a stick... He might not respond straight away

[Bug 65995] Re: Mistakes in libvisual strings

2008-05-16 Thread Sebastian Rode
If this is still a issue then to get your fix included in Ubuntu, it would help if you tried transforming it into a debdiff (http://wiki.ubuntu.com/PackagingGuide/Recipes/Debdiff) and submit it for review (http://wiki.ubuntu.com/SponsorshipProcess). If you prefer somebody else to do that, that's

[Bug 65995] Re: Mistakes in libvisual strings

2006-10-13 Thread Malcolm Parsons
** Attachment added: patch to fix strings (and comments) http://librarian.launchpad.net/4826609/libvisual-strings.patch -- Mistakes in libvisual strings https://launchpad.net/bugs/65995 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com