[Bug 660649] Re: fsck.btrfs not found in the system

2012-05-20 Thread Carey Underwood
Really, it should be treated the same way as fsck.xfs: fsck.btrfs being a no-op, with a message for a user to invoke btrfsck if they want to do a manual check. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 660649] Re: fsck.btrfs not found in the system

2011-07-30 Thread Joke de Buhr
Well you can always disable the filesystem check via /etc/fstab. Just set the value in the sixth column to 0. This way fsck assumes the filesystem doesn’t need to be checked ever and fsck.btrfs will never be run. But you have to remember enable the check later on if a proper fsck.btrfs has been

[Bug 660649] Re: fsck.btrfs not found in the system

2011-07-29 Thread Dick Thomas
|I've also got this problem on debian and ubuntu but i had to manually create the symlink from btrfsck to fsck.btrfs but now i get an error about -a it goes past too fast to write down but it is about -a -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 660649] Re: fsck.btrfs not found in the system

2011-04-24 Thread Id2ndR
In my case it adds 4 seconds (root partition on my SSD). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/660649 Title: fsck.btrfs not found in the system -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 660649] Re: fsck.btrfs not found in the system

2011-04-03 Thread Joke de Buhr
In my case the symblink adds about 20 minutes to my boot. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/660649 Title: fsck.btrfs not found in the system -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 660649] Re: fsck.btrfs not found in the system

2011-04-02 Thread Andrius Štikonas
After this update btrfsck does full disk scan on every boot which is not a good idea. Probably btrfsck does not yet mark filesystem as clean after checking it and btrfsck only checks filesystem, it cannot repair filesystem yet, so maybe it would be better to wait until C. Mason release his new

[Bug 660649] Re: fsck.btrfs not found in the system

2011-04-02 Thread DavidEscott
btrfs check is adding ~75 seconds to my boot. I would like to see this symlink removed until the tools works better. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/660649 Title: fsck.btrfs not found

[Bug 660649] Re: fsck.btrfs not found in the system

2011-04-01 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package btrfs-tools - 0.19+20100601-3ubuntu2 --- btrfs-tools (0.19+20100601-3ubuntu2) natty; urgency=low * New patch, ignore all arguments starting with - as to be compatible with the way mountall and other programs call fsck.btrfs (for instance with

[Bug 660649] Re: fsck.btrfs not found in the system

2011-04-01 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/btrfs-tools -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/660649 Title: fsck.btrfs not found in the system -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 660649] Re: fsck.btrfs not found in the system

2011-03-30 Thread Loïc Minier
See also bug #460246 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/660649 Title: fsck.btrfs not found in the system -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 660649] Re: fsck.btrfs not found in the system

2011-03-30 Thread Loïc Minier
I've pushed a btrfs-tools package in my PPA with the symlink and a patch to skip -* flags passed to btrfsck; would someone please test it? I can test on armel, but I don't have an armel build of it (and I'm lazy). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 660649] Re: fsck.btrfs not found in the system

2010-11-23 Thread Gary M
@evan : I see the current behaviour of mountall as a feature, as I'm happy to be reminded that btrfs is still a work in progress. A better btrfs repair tool may appear upstream soon and make it into the natty release. -- fsck.btrfs not found in the system https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/660649

[Bug 660649] Re: fsck.btrfs not found in the system

2010-11-15 Thread e...@status.net
So is this properly a bug on mountall, then? -- fsck.btrfs not found in the system https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/660649 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 660649] Re: fsck.btrfs not found in the system

2010-10-18 Thread Gary M
The fsck,btrfs symlink was deliberately removed upstream, as btrfsck is far from complete and does not support the various command line options used to invoke it at boot time (bug #460246). ** Changed in: btrfs-tools (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed ** Also affects: btrfs-tools (Debian)

[Bug 660649] Re: fsck.btrfs not found in the system

2010-10-15 Thread MSU
confirm - same here: fsck: fsck.btrfs: not found appears during boot, 10.10 x86_64 -- fsck.btrfs not found in the system https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/660649 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 660649] Re: fsck.btrfs not found in the system

2010-10-14 Thread BSA
-- fsck.btrfs not found in the system https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/660649 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com