** Changed in: glusterfs
Importance: Unknown = Critical
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/666494
Title:
Data Corruption bug in GlusterFS 3.0.2
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
I removed the proposed package, as there has been no feeback in over
three months, and we need to clear the queues for 10.04.2.
** Changed in: glusterfs (Ubuntu Lucid)
Status: Fix Committed = Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
Any testers of the proposed lucid package?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/666494
Title:
Data Corruption bug in GlusterFS 3.0.2
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
We stopped using GlusterFS as it was deemed too much of a risk.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/666494
Title:
Data Corruption bug in GlusterFS 3.0.2
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Accepted glusterfs into lucid-proposed, the package will build now and
be available in a few hours. Please test and give feedback here. See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to
enable and use -proposed. Thank you in advance!
** Tags added: verification-needed
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/lucid-proposed/glusterfs
--
Data Corruption bug in GlusterFS 3.0.2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/666494
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Another link for my own benefit
http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/pending-sru.html
--
Data Corruption bug in GlusterFS 3.0.2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/666494
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
** Changed in: glusterfs
Status: Unknown = Fix Released
--
Data Corruption bug in GlusterFS 3.0.2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/666494
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Just a link for my benefit to see recent lucid-proposed uploads:
http://www.ubuntuupdates.org/package_logs?type=sourcesvals=325
--
Data Corruption bug in GlusterFS 3.0.2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/666494
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
** Patch removed: glusterfs_3.0.2-1ubuntu1.debdiff
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glusterfs/+bug/666494/+attachment/1711751/+files/glusterfs_3.0.2-1ubuntu1.debdiff
** Patch removed: glusterfs_3.0.2-1ubuntu0.1.debdiff
** Bug watch added: bugs.gluster.com/cgi-bin/bugzilla3/ #639
http://bugs.gluster.com/cgi-bin/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=639
** Also affects: glusterfs via
http://bugs.gluster.com/cgi-bin/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=639
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
Data Corruption bug in
Hi, you subscribed ubuntu-sponsors, but there's no clear action for us,
so I've unsubscribed sponsors for now. Please resubscribe when there's
an upload requiring sponsorship.
What exactly are you requesting? An SRU patch for the version in lucid?
If so please nominate this bug for lucid. Can you
Debdiff with patch from upstream.
** Patch added: glusterfs_3.0.2-1ubuntu1.debdiff
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glusterfs/+bug/666494/+attachment/1711751/+files/glusterfs_3.0.2-1ubuntu1.debdiff
** Description changed:
Impact: data corruption when using GlusterFS with certain
** Also affects: glusterfs (Ubuntu Lucid)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: glusterfs (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Fix Released
** Changed in: glusterfs (Ubuntu Lucid)
Importance: Undecided = High
--
Data Corruption bug in GlusterFS 3.0.2
Thanks. This just needs some tweaks before it can be uploaded:
+## Description: add some description
+## Origin/Author: add some origin or author
+## Bug: bug URL
Would you mind updating those to actually have content?
Can you also provide a test case (as required by
debdiff updated as requested.
** Patch added: glusterfs_3.0.2-1ubuntu0.1.debdiff
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glusterfs/+bug/666494/+attachment/1711960/+files/glusterfs_3.0.2-1ubuntu0.1.debdiff
--
Data Corruption bug in GlusterFS 3.0.2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/666494
Didn't see the part about marking test cases as TEST CASE: until a moment ago.
Updated debdiff regarding that.
** Patch added: glusterfs_3.0.2-1ubuntu0.1.debdiff
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glusterfs/+bug/666494/+attachment/1711992/+files/glusterfs_3.0.2-1ubuntu0.1.debdiff
--
Another slight improvement to the comments in the patch. The impact:
field has been renamed to Description:.
** Patch added: glusterfs_3.0.2-1ubuntu0.1.debdiff
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glusterfs/+bug/666494/+attachment/1712001/+files/glusterfs_3.0.2-1ubuntu0.1.debdiff
--
The test case and regression potential belong in the description of this
bug, not the patch.
* debian/patches/1-fix-data-corruption-bug.patch: LP #666494
It's still missing a colon after the LP, and it could use a description. I'd do
this:
* 1-fix-data-corruption-bug.patch: Backport typo
Thanks for helping me with my first debdiff ever, Stefano Rivera. :)
Here's the updated debdiff again.
** Patch added: glusterfs_3.0.2-1ubuntu0.1.debdiff
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glusterfs/+bug/666494/+attachment/1712381/+files/glusterfs_3.0.2-1ubuntu0.1.debdiff
--
Data
No problem. Hope to see more debdiffs from you soon :)
Uploaded to lucid-proposed, pending SRU team review. (Subscribed Ubuntu-
sru).
--
Data Corruption bug in GlusterFS 3.0.2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/666494
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
** Changed in: glusterfs (Ubuntu Lucid)
Status: New = Fix Committed
--
Data Corruption bug in GlusterFS 3.0.2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/666494
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
** Description changed:
+ Impact: possible data corruption when using GlusterFS with certain options
set.
+ Patch: TBD
+ Reproducing: http://bugs.gluster.com/cgi-bin/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=639
+ Regression potential: none known
+
I was looking through the Changelog of GlusterFS 3.0.4 to
** Description changed:
Impact: data corruption when using GlusterFS with certain options set.
Patch: http://patches.gluster.com/patch/2781/
Reproducing: http://bugs.gluster.com/cgi-bin/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=639
Regression potential: none known
-
- I was looking through the Changelog
24 matches
Mail list logo
