Here's a patch for the merge from the latest version in Debian
experimental. I tested it and seems it works good.
** Patch removed: e2fsprogs_1.41.12-2ubuntu1.debdiff
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/e2fsprogs/+bug/681418/+attachment/1758354/+files/e2fsprogs_1.41.12-2ubuntu1.debdiff
+1 for merge 1.41.14-1 from experimental.
** Summary changed:
- Please merge e2fsprogs 1.41.12-2 (main) from debian unstable (main)
+ Please merge e2fsprogs 1.41.12-2 (main) from Debian unstable (main)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Note that I've released e2fsprogs 1.41.14, which has fix for a big-
endian FTBFS problem, and a few other late-breaking bug fixes.
There is also a e2fsprogs 1.41.14-1 which I've uploaded to Debian
experimental.
Last I checked there were still some unnecessary differences between
Ubuntu and
Lorenzo: would you be willing to test the e2fsprogs upload to
experimental once it happens and check the diff? Until then I'll
unsubscribe the sponsors.
Thanks a lot everyone for your efforts!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
** Tags added: patch
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/681418
Title:
Please merge e2fsprogs 1.41.12-2 (main) from debian unstable (main)
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
There is only one flaw I could see: The vcs-git line is removed in
control, but not in control.in. Otherwise the latest debdiff seems to
carry all the suggestions mentioned.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Hm, actually there seems to have happened one other upload to natty in
between.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/681418
Title:
Please merge e2fsprogs 1.41.12-2 (main) from debian
FYI I've just released e2fsprogs 1.41.13. A debian package will be
uploaded in a few days to experimental (I'm not in a rush and it won't
go into unstable since Debian is currently in a deep freeze for the
Squeeze release). I anticipate the .diff file from:
** Branch linked: lp:~stefan-bader-
canonical/ubuntu/natty/e2fsprogs/branch
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/681418
Title:
Please merge e2fsprogs 1.41.12-2 (main) from debian unstable
Thanks for your work there, can you address Thoedore's remark and submit
a new patch please?
Thanks a lot for your hard work :)
** Changed in: e2fsprogs (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
The attached debdiff should fix the issues pointed out by Theodore Ts'o.
** Patch added: e2fsprogs_1.41.12-2ubuntu1.debdiff
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/e2fsprogs/+bug/681418/+attachment/1758354/+files/e2fsprogs_1.41.12-2ubuntu1.debdiff
** Changed in: e2fsprogs (Ubuntu)
Hi! Thanks very much for putting this debdiff together. There are a few
things I find strange that maybe should be fixed first:
- export NO_PKG_MANGLE=1 is missing from the rules file
- a TODO file is being added?
- the changelog file doesn't mention which files are being changed for which
Here's another debdiff with the issue that Kees Cook pointed out fixed.
** Patch added: e2fsprogs_1.41.12-2ubuntu1.debdiff
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/e2fsprogs/+bug/681418/+attachment/1757903/+files/e2fsprogs_1.41.12-2ubuntu1.debdiff
** Changed in: e2fsprogs (Ubuntu)
There are a bunch of things in the diff file, such as the TODO file,
which were added because at one point someone at Ubuntu choose to
start by grabbing an snapshot of the e2fsprogs git tree and used that as
a starting point. The TODO file is in the git tree, but it is stripped
out of the
Also, please drop README.subset from the debdiff. Same story as TODO
and the Makefile.pq files.
In general, it would be nice if whoever is assembling the debdiff file
could be able to explain the reason for every line in the debdiff file.
The fact that junk has been propagating for years in
debdiff applies cleanly to Debian package (1.41.12-2), and builds on
Natty. The concern I have is that this package is traditionally
maintained in Ubuntu Git (see the VCS header), this change would be out
of tree.
Subscribing Keybuk for comment, as the Git tree maintainer.
Thanks.
--
You
Hello Alessio,
Lorenzo,
Theodore said that the changes related to the following point:
always build with external libblkid and libuuid
are no longer necessary. WDYT?
Here's a debdiff without that change applied. I tested the package
personally and it's not required, I also checked the
** Patch added: e2fsprogs_1.41.12-2ubuntu1.debdiff
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/e2fsprogs/+bug/681418/+attachment/1751783/+files/e2fsprogs_1.41.12-2ubuntu1.debdiff
** Patch removed: e2fsprogs_1.41.12-2ubuntu1.debdiff
Lorenzo, I'm not sure I understand your last comment. Does the patch in
comment 1 need reiview/upload? Or are you going to update it to include
the newest version in Debian?
--
Please merge e2fsprogs 1.41.12-2 (main) from debian unstable (main)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/681418
You received
Hello Daniel,
Lorenzo, I'm not sure I understand your last comment. Does the patch
in comment 1 need reiview/upload? Or are you going to update it to
include the newest version in Debian?
As you can read in comment #7, Theodore applied this change in the
latest version he will release (he's
Lorenzo,
Theodore said that the changes related to the following point:
always build with external libblkid and libuuid
are no longer necessary. WDYT?
** Changed in: e2fsprogs (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Incomplete
--
Please merge e2fsprogs 1.41.12-2 (main) from debian unstable (main)
Hello Theodore,
No one bothered to submit to me the resize2fs patch for bug #505719.
It's a one word addition, and I have it now it wlil be in 1.41.13.
I was about to do that. Thank you for applying this change!
--
Please merge e2fsprogs 1.41.12-2 (main) from debian unstable (main)
Setting back to 'New' as the bug can be reproduced in the latest version
available in Debian unstable (see comment #7).
** Changed in: e2fsprogs (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = New
--
Please merge e2fsprogs 1.41.12-2 (main) from debian unstable (main)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/681418
Hello Alessio,
it's there:
diff -u e2fsprogs-1.41.12/debian/rules e2fsprogs-1.41.12/debian/rules
--- e2fsprogs-1.41.12/debian/rules
+++ e2fsprogs-1.41.12/debian/rules
@@ -9,13 +9,10 @@
[...]
+# no chance that pkg-create-dbgsym can cope with this package's manual
construction of -dbg
+export
Hello Theodore,
This is a merge, please see
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/Merging .
--
Please merge e2fsprogs 1.41.12-2 (main) from debian unstable (main)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/681418
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Lorenzo, catched it, thanks.
And what about resize2fss's -p option? (bug #505719)
Seems we still need it, is it so? Would you mind to submit this to Debian in
order to ask the maintainer what he thinks about it?
Thanks in advance.
** Changed in: e2fsprogs (Ubuntu)
Status: New =
No one bothered to submit to me the resize2fs patch for bug #505719.
It's a one word addition, and I have it now it wlil be in 1.41.13.
Note that some of the changes to always build with external libblkid
and libuuid to the rules file aren't technically necessary, since the
rules file will
** Patch added: e2fsprogs_1.41.12-2ubuntu1.debdiff
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/e2fsprogs/+bug/681418/+attachment/1744798/+files/e2fsprogs_1.41.12-2ubuntu1.debdiff
** Changed in: e2fsprogs (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Wishlist
--
Please merge e2fsprogs 1.41.12-2 (main)
n.b. 1.41.13 will be out soon (as in by early December), and an 1.42
snapshot release of e2fsprogs (with support for 64-bit block numbers)
for testing purposes before the end of the year.
The debian import freeze for Natty is December 30th, and Feature Freeze
is February 24th. So we have plenty
How did you achieve this?
+- Do now allow pkg-create-dbgsym to operate on this package.
I cannot find the above change in the debdiff. Unsubscribing sponsors
for now.
** Changed in: e2fsprogs (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Incomplete
** Changed in: e2fsprogs (Ubuntu)
Assignee:
30 matches
Mail list logo
