[Bug 68191] Re: cpufreq scaling_grovernor only saved for CPU0 on SMP following suspend/resume.

2014-02-04 Thread Nick Gerner
I'm not sure if this is being tracked elsewhere, but I'm certainly finding that /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/ondemand/up_threshold (for example) gets reset after resume from sleep. I'm using sysfsutils and my workaround is to drop a script in /etc/pm/sleep.d/90_sysfsutils: #!/bin/sh # Tell gr

[Bug 68191] Re: cpufreq scaling_grovernor only saved for CPU0 on SMP following suspend/resume.

2008-05-16 Thread Edney Matias da Silva
Hi! I'm not using Ubuntu right now. Running Gentoo with kernel 2.6.25 with processor ACPI compiled in the kernel as well as cpu frequency scaling and governors and the problem do exists on my setup. Maybe this confirm it's a kernel issue. Any information i can provide, just ask. Running on Dell

[Bug 68191] Re: cpufreq scaling_grovernor only saved for CPU0 on SMP following suspend/resume.

2008-05-15 Thread ethanay
sudo modprobe -r acpi_cpufreq is not allowed, requiring full reboot to fix cpu scaling "FATAL: Module acpi_cpufreq is in use." -- cpufreq scaling_grovernor only saved for CPU0 on SMP following suspend/resume. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/68191 You received this bug notification because you ar

[Bug 68191] Re: cpufreq scaling_grovernor only saved for CPU0 on SMP following suspend/resume.

2008-05-15 Thread ethanay
Dell XPS m1330 Intel Core 2 Duo 1.5ghz Hardy 8.04 w/latest I am NOT running powernowd -- I am using ondemand directly via and made permanent via sysfs.conf I can confirm after resume from suspend, CPU1 is locked at its maximum. This is not a cosmetic bug, as powertop reports ~3-4 watts greater us

[Bug 68191] Re: cpufreq scaling_grovernor only saved for CPU0 on SMP following suspend/resume.

2008-04-18 Thread Heikki Toivonen
I am also experiencing this on Dell Latitude D830, running 64_x86 8.04 beta + updates. I logged output from "dmesg", "cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/*/cpufreq/*" (and "cat /proc/cpuinfo" for the heck of it) both before a suspend (both cores in ondemand mode) and after coming back from suspend (core#1

[Bug 68191] Re: cpufreq scaling_grovernor only saved for CPU0 on SMP following suspend/resume.

2008-03-21 Thread Jörn Schmidt
I have the a similar problem with Hardy. After resume, both cpu cores are set to performance governor and full speed. -- cpufreq scaling_grovernor only saved for CPU0 on SMP following suspend/resume. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/68191 You received this bug notification because you are a membe

[Bug 68191] Re: cpufreq scaling_grovernor only saved for CPU0 on SMP following suspend/resume.

2008-03-07 Thread Janne Hyötylä
Setting status back to confirmed since previous fix apparently doesn't work as expected. ** Changed in: acpi-support (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released => Confirmed -- cpufreq scaling_grovernor only saved for CPU0 on SMP following suspend/resume. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/68191 You recei

[Bug 68191] Re: cpufreq scaling_grovernor only saved for CPU0 on SMP following suspend/resume.

2008-03-07 Thread Janne Hyötylä
Tested this with the new Hardy Alpha 5 LiveCD. CPU1 gets stuck at 2 GHz (full speed) again now after resuming from a suspend. -- cpufreq scaling_grovernor only saved for CPU0 on SMP following suspend/resume. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/68191 You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 68191] Re: cpufreq scaling_grovernor only saved for CPU0 on SMP following suspend/resume.

2008-03-07 Thread Janne Hyötylä
I think I have the same problem. on the early Gutsy final versions, CPU1 got stuck on 2 GHz (full speed) most of the time after a suspend-to-ram. But now CPU1 always gets stuck at 800 MHz (lowest speed) after a suspend. Performance scaling with CPU0 works fine. I have added a more detailed comment

[Bug 68191] Re: cpufreq scaling_grovernor only saved for CPU0 on SMP following suspend/resume.

2008-01-22 Thread spotslayer
I have seen this bug report and the dups. Not sure which one to choose. This seems to be the best. I have attached the output of $cpufreq-info. I always have this problem since upgrade to 7.10. Does not require a suspend. Alway the same. The output current policy: frequency should be within 1000 M

[Bug 68191] Re: cpufreq scaling_grovernor only saved for CPU0 on SMP following suspend/resume.

2008-01-16 Thread David Tomaschik
Does anyone else think this might be a duplicate of #124797 or #183033 (or both?) It's hard to tell, but they definitely seem related to me. -- cpufreq scaling_grovernor only saved for CPU0 on SMP following suspend/resume. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/68191 You received this bug notification

[Bug 68191] Re: cpufreq scaling_grovernor only saved for CPU0 on SMP following suspend/resume.

2008-01-13 Thread enigma_0Z
Problem still exists for me: No /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/cpufreq on resume. I am using acpi-support scripts to suspend my system instead of powersaved, however, because powersaved does not resume my nVidia graphics card properly. I'm on Gutsy (7.10) right now, is there a fix available yet? --

[Bug 68191] Re: cpufreq scaling_grovernor only saved for CPU0 on SMP following suspend/resume.

2007-04-04 Thread emvy
An addition: the governor on CPU1 is now 'userspace' after suspend. However, it still stays at top speed without any usage. -- cpufreq scaling_grovernor only saved for CPU0 on SMP following suspend/resume. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/68191 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 68191] Re: cpufreq scaling_grovernor only saved for CPU0 on SMP following suspend/resume.

2007-04-04 Thread emvy
It still does not work on a Lenovo T60. -- cpufreq scaling_grovernor only saved for CPU0 on SMP following suspend/resume. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/68191 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing

[Bug 68191] Re: cpufreq scaling_grovernor only saved for CPU0 on SMP following suspend/resume.

2007-03-24 Thread Paul Sladen
acpi-support (0.94) feisty; urgency=low * Save and restore values that the kernel does not preserve across suspend/resume and hibernate/resume: - /sys/class/net/eth*/device/rf_kill (Closes: LP #37010) - /proc/acpi/ibm/bluetooth (Closes: LP #37175) - /sys/devices/system/cp

[Bug 68191] Re: cpufreq scaling_grovernor only saved for CPU0 on SMP following suspend/resume.

2007-03-21 Thread Paul Sladen
** Changed in: acpi-support (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Paul Sladen Status: Confirmed => In Progress -- cpufreq scaling_grovernor only saved for CPU0 on SMP following suspend/resume. https://launchpad.net/bugs/68191 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com htt

[Bug 68191] Re: cpufreq scaling_grovernor only saved for CPU0 on SMP following suspend/resume.

2007-03-21 Thread Paul Sladen
We did some investigation into this (see bug #78512). Turns out that the kernel hotunplugs the CPUs during a suspend/resume, so the CPUs actually /disappear/ and therefore can't retain their state. Ideally this is fixed in 'udev' in the long run with hotplug CPU support; in the medium term we'll