[Bug 688286] Re: [MIR] ofono

2016-12-07 Thread derf
** Changed in: ofono (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/688286 Title: [MIR] ofono To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 688286] Re: [MIR] ofono

2016-09-15 Thread Tony Espy
Ah, thanks for the clarification. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/688286 Title: [MIR] ofono To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 688286] Re: [MIR] ofono

2016-09-15 Thread Michael Terry
@Tony, I just was pointing out a lintian warning. What it means is that ofono-scripts is installing a python script (/usr/share/ofono/scripts /set-ddr) but does not Depend on python. So if installed on a (very bare) system, that script wouldn't work. -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 688286] Re: [MIR] ofono

2016-09-15 Thread Tony Espy
@Michael Didn't quite catch that last bit about ofono-scripts. Care to elaborate? Is this something we should fix in our next landing? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/688286 Title:

[Bug 688286] Re: [MIR] ofono

2016-09-09 Thread Michael Terry
I reviewed this 6 years ago... Yikes. So a quick scan shows it to still be fine. Security is OK with this. There are a million bugs, but putting this in main is part of a slow transition, it should be fine. One minor note: ofono-scripts: python-script-but-no-python-dep

[Bug 688286] Re: [MIR] ofono

2016-09-08 Thread Tony Espy
** Changed in: ofono (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Critical ** Changed in: ofono (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => In Progress ** Description changed: - Binary package hint: ofono + [Availability] + * Available in universe - I have reviewed the package and it meets the

[Bug 688286] Re: [MIR] ofono

2013-10-02 Thread Tony Espy
Hope nobody's upset that I grabbed this one. We should definitely make this happen for 14.04. ** Changed in: ofono (Ubuntu) Assignee: Ubuntu Desktop (ubuntu-desktop) = Tony Espy (awe) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

Re: [Bug 688286] Re: [MIR] ofono

2011-01-28 Thread Kees Cook
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 09:53:09PM -, Kalle Valo wrote: CAP_NET_RAW, CAP_SYS_ADMIN, -1); Is that enough? ofono would then need to build depend on libcap-ng-dev, but it's in main already AFAICS. CAP_SYS_ADMIN is basically full root still, so that's not

[Bug 688286] Re: [MIR] ofono

2011-01-10 Thread Kalle Valo
With --enable-capng ofono would drop privileges: #ifdef HAVE_CAPNG /* Drop capabilities */ capng_clear(CAPNG_SELECT_BOTH); capng_updatev(CAPNG_ADD, CAPNG_EFFECTIVE | CAPNG_PERMITTED, CAP_NET_BIND_SERVICE, CAP_NET_ADMIN,

[Bug 688286] Re: [MIR] ofono

2010-12-14 Thread Kees Cook
This daemon should drop privileges or have an AppArmor profile defined and in use. It listens on system dbus, which gives it a huge attack surface. ** Changed in: ofono (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed = Incomplete ** Changed in: ofono (Ubuntu) Assignee: Ubuntu Security Team

[Bug 688286] Re: [MIR] ofono

2010-12-14 Thread Kees Cook
Additionally, the daemon starts unconditionally, even if I'm never going to use a device that it manages. I think it should start only when needed to avoid the memory footprint. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 688286] Re: [MIR] ofono

2010-12-10 Thread Matthias Klose
could ubuntu-security please have a final look? package starts a daemon ** Changed in: ofono (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Ubuntu Security Team (ubuntu-security) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 688286] Re: [MIR] ofono

2010-12-09 Thread Michael Terry
Approved. Good packaging, builds clean, etc. There are a lot of sprintf calls, which always makes me nervous, but they seemed to all be either sensible buffer sizes or guarded (with strlen checks). One thing I don't get is ofono-dev. There's no library, why the headers? Seems like the headers