[Expired for indicator-datetime (Ubuntu) because there has been no
activity for 60 days.]
** Changed in: indicator-datetime (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu.
[Expired for ntp (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60
days.]
** Changed in: ntp (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu.
[Expired for indicator-datetime (Ubuntu) because there has been no
activity for 60 days.]
** Changed in: indicator-datetime (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
[Expired for ntp (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60
days.]
** Changed in: ntp (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/781088
Title:
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. The issue that you reported is one that should be
reproducible with the live environment of the Desktop ISO of the
development release - Trusty Tahr. It would help us greatly if you could
test with it so we can
Hi Charles. I'm a core dev and I run Trusty on my laptop. Still
affected as of 2 months ago when I last traveled with that laptop. I
will test again with the latest software and post the results soon.
Excerpts from Charles Kerr's message of 2014-03-15 19:29:50 UTC:
Thank you for taking the time
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. The issue that you reported is one that should be
reproducible with the live environment of the Desktop ISO of the
development release - Trusty Tahr. It would help us greatly if you could
test with it so we can
Hi Charles. I'm a core dev and I run Trusty on my laptop. Still
affected as of 2 months ago when I last traveled with that laptop. I
will test again with the latest software and post the results soon.
Excerpts from Charles Kerr's message of 2014-03-15 19:29:50 UTC:
Thank you for taking the time
Craig, or anyone else affected, can you perhaps include the output of
this command:
$ ntpq -pn -c assoc
remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset jitter
==
+72.26.198.240 64.90.182.55 2
Craig, or anyone else affected, can you perhaps include the output of
this command:
$ ntpq -pn -c assoc
remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset jitter
==
+72.26.198.240 64.90.182.55 2
I'm having the same problem in 11.10; my clock is almost always 9 or 10
minutes fast. For me, it's been happening since I relocated from the
midwest (U.S.) to France. When I run ntpdate, I get the following:
someone@someone-UBook:~$ ntpdate
5 Mar 09:35:46 ntpdate[14926]: no servers can be used,
I'm having the same problem in 11.10; my clock is almost always 9 or 10
minutes fast. For me, it's been happening since I relocated from the
midwest (U.S.) to France. When I run ntpdate, I get the following:
someone@someone-UBook:~$ ntpdate
5 Mar 09:35:46 ntpdate[14926]: no servers can be used,
@brawehear: no, it should not. The ntp.drift is a (continuously updated)
measure of how much your system's hardware clock deviates from time
sources (the NTP servers, or a real precise clock attached to the
machine) -- in other words, how much your hardware clock _drifts_ from
reliable clock
@brawehear: no, it should not. The ntp.drift is a (continuously updated)
measure of how much your system's hardware clock deviates from time
sources (the NTP servers, or a real precise clock attached to the
machine) -- in other words, how much your hardware clock _drifts_ from
reliable clock
The content of my /var/lib/ntp/ntp.drift is
-12.161
shouldn't it be som adresses to ntp servers instead?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/781088
Title:
Time is not
The content of my /var/lib/ntp/ntp.drift is
-12.161
shouldn't it be som adresses to ntp servers instead?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/781088
Title:
Time is not syncronized with
Yesterday (2011/05/22), I installed ubuntu 11.04 32 bits and this
problem appears during the installation.
** Changed in: indicator-datetime (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
** Changed in: ntp (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you
@Clint,
yes, I know about the problem, if the system-clock is too way off. But
that was not the case on my machine - at most a minute or so.
And no, while installing and doing the first boots of the new 11.4,
there were no connection problems.
And yes, unless somebody rewrote the code for the
Excerpts from gerti's message of Mon May 23 13:22:53 UTC 2011:
@Clint,
yes, I know about the problem, if the system-clock is too way off. But
that was not the case on my machine - at most a minute or so.
And no, while installing and doing the first boots of the new 11.4,
there were no
Excerpts from gerti's message of Mon May 23 13:22:53 UTC 2011:
@Clint,
yes, I know about the problem, if the system-clock is too way off. But
that was not the case on my machine - at most a minute or so.
And no, while installing and doing the first boots of the new 11.4,
there were no
Yesterday (2011/05/22), I installed ubuntu 11.04 32 bits and this
problem appears during the installation.
** Changed in: indicator-datetime (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
** Changed in: ntp (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you
@Clint,
yes, I know about the problem, if the system-clock is too way off. But
that was not the case on my machine - at most a minute or so.
And no, while installing and doing the first boots of the new 11.4,
there were no connection problems.
And yes, unless somebody rewrote the code for the
Excerpts from gerti's message of Sat May 21 16:47:41 UTC 2011:
Hi Clint,
I appreciate, that a lot of the work going on around Ubuntu, is
voluntary non-paid time,
and I DO appreciate, that heroic endeavor; cause otherwise, I could
only fall back to the ridiculously bug-ridden MS
Excerpts from gerti's message of Sat May 21 16:47:41 UTC 2011:
Hi Clint,
I appreciate, that a lot of the work going on around Ubuntu, is
voluntary non-paid time,
and I DO appreciate, that heroic endeavor; cause otherwise, I could
only fall back to the ridiculously bug-ridden MS
Hi Clint,
I appreciate, that a lot of the work going on around Ubuntu, is
voluntary non-paid time,
and I DO appreciate, that heroic endeavor; cause otherwise, I could
only fall back to the ridiculously bug-ridden MS Windows...
But I would recommend that a person having authority to and taking
Hi Clint,
I appreciate, that a lot of the work going on around Ubuntu, is
voluntary non-paid time,
and I DO appreciate, that heroic endeavor; cause otherwise, I could
only fall back to the ridiculously bug-ridden MS Windows...
But I would recommend that a person having authority to and taking
Hi Clint,
thanks for your answer.
Yes the 4 NTP-servers, you cite, IF you install the NTP-daemon.
But as it didn't work, I removed the NTP-daemon again.
I shouldn't need the NTP-daemon, as I don't want to run a NTP-service
for other machines om my network.
As of this moment
grep pool
Excerpts from gerti's message of Fri May 20 19:54:59 UTC 2011:
Hi Clint,
thanks for your answer.
Yes the 4 NTP-servers, you cite, IF you install the NTP-daemon.
But as it didn't work, I removed the NTP-daemon again.
I shouldn't need the NTP-daemon, as I don't want to run a NTP-service
Hi Clint,
thanks for your answer.
Yes the 4 NTP-servers, you cite, IF you install the NTP-daemon.
But as it didn't work, I removed the NTP-daemon again.
I shouldn't need the NTP-daemon, as I don't want to run a NTP-service
for other machines om my network.
As of this moment
grep pool
Excerpts from gerti's message of Fri May 20 19:54:59 UTC 2011:
Hi Clint,
thanks for your answer.
Yes the 4 NTP-servers, you cite, IF you install the NTP-daemon.
But as it didn't work, I removed the NTP-daemon again.
I shouldn't need the NTP-daemon, as I don't want to run a NTP-service
Hi gerti! Thanks for taking the time to file this bug report and help us
make Ubuntu better.
I am not seeing the same effect as you on a fresh Natty install.
/etc/ntp.conf has 4 servers configured by default:
grep pool /etc/ntp.conf
# on 2011-02-08 (LP: #104525). See
Hi gerti! Thanks for taking the time to file this bug report and help us
make Ubuntu better.
I am not seeing the same effect as you on a fresh Natty install.
/etc/ntp.conf has 4 servers configured by default:
grep pool /etc/ntp.conf
# on 2011-02-08 (LP: #104525). See
** Package changed: ubuntu = ntp (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/781088
Title:
Time is not syncronized with NTP-server
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
** Package changed: ubuntu = ntp (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/781088
Title:
Time is not syncronized with NTP-server
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/781088
Title:
Time is not syncronized with NTP-server
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
35 matches
Mail list logo
