[Bug 826873] Re: ATOM refclock driver not compiled into ntpd

2017-01-25 Thread Joshua Powers
I believe this was resolved in Debian and in Ubuntu as of yakkety and newer. pps-tools is a build-dependency now and the kernel has has CONFIG_PPS=m for a while. Marking Fix Released unless someone comes back and says otherwise. ** Changed in: ntp (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix

[Bug 826873] Re: ATOM refclock driver not compiled into ntpd

2016-04-28 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: ntp (Debian) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/826873 Title: ATOM refclock driver not compiled into ntpd To manage notifications about

[Bug 826873] Re: ATOM refclock driver not compiled into ntpd

2014-04-25 Thread JanCeuleers
According to [1], the fix is to ensure that the ppstools package is installed on the system used to build the ntp package, as that is the package that provides the timepps header file that the ntpd build system needs in order to enable pps support. [1]:

[Bug 826873] Re: ATOM refclock driver not compiled into ntpd

2014-04-25 Thread Kenyon Ralph
On 2014-04-25T11:05:45-, JanCeuleers 826...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: According to [1], the fix is to ensure that the ppstools package is installed on the system used to build the ntp package, as that is the package that provides the timepps header file that the ntpd build system needs in

[Bug 826873] Re: ATOM refclock driver not compiled into ntpd

2014-04-25 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
** Also affects: ntp via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=691672 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Also affects: ntp (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=691672 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** No longer affects: ntp

[Bug 826873] Re: ATOM refclock driver not compiled into ntpd

2014-04-25 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: ntp (Debian) Status: Unknown = New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/826873 Title: ATOM refclock driver not compiled into ntpd To manage

[Bug 826873] Re: ATOM refclock driver not compiled into ntpd

2014-04-25 Thread JanCeuleers
According to [1], the fix is to ensure that the ppstools package is installed on the system used to build the ntp package, as that is the package that provides the timepps header file that the ntpd build system needs in order to enable pps support. [1]:

[Bug 826873] Re: ATOM refclock driver not compiled into ntpd

2014-04-25 Thread Kenyon Ralph
On 2014-04-25T11:05:45-, JanCeuleers 826...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: According to [1], the fix is to ensure that the ppstools package is installed on the system used to build the ntp package, as that is the package that provides the timepps header file that the ntpd build system needs in

[Bug 826873] Re: ATOM refclock driver not compiled into ntpd

2014-04-25 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
** Also affects: ntp via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=691672 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Also affects: ntp (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=691672 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** No longer affects: ntp

[Bug 826873] Re: ATOM refclock driver not compiled into ntpd

2014-04-25 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: ntp (Debian) Status: Unknown = New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/826873 Title: ATOM refclock driver not compiled into ntpd To manage notifications about this

[Bug 826873] Re: ATOM refclock driver not compiled into ntpd

2011-09-30 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users. ** Changed in: ntp (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/826873

[Bug 826873] Re: ATOM refclock driver not compiled into ntpd

2011-09-30 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users. ** Changed in: ntp (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/826873 Title: ATOM

[Bug 826873] Re: ATOM refclock driver not compiled into ntpd

2011-08-16 Thread Dave Walker
Thanks for the bug report. This needs investigation as to why this isn't done, and more importantly why the headers are missing. Are they bundled in the upstream tarball. This should probably be resolved in Debian first to avoid increasing our delta with them. ** Changed in: ntp (Ubuntu)

[Bug 826873] Re: ATOM refclock driver not compiled into ntpd

2011-08-16 Thread Weisi
In the meanwhile, I found out that it is only one file - timepps.h from git://github.com/ago/pps-tools.git (attached) - which is missing. I copied it into /usr/include and then configure/make builds ntpd with the ATOM refclock (PPS) support. Tested with Linux 2.6.38 and ntp-4.2.6.p2+dfsg

[Bug 826873] Re: ATOM refclock driver not compiled into ntpd

2011-08-16 Thread Dave Walker
Thanks for the bug report. This needs investigation as to why this isn't done, and more importantly why the headers are missing. Are they bundled in the upstream tarball. This should probably be resolved in Debian first to avoid increasing our delta with them. ** Changed in: ntp (Ubuntu)

[Bug 826873] Re: ATOM refclock driver not compiled into ntpd

2011-08-16 Thread Weisi
In the meanwhile, I found out that it is only one file - timepps.h from git://github.com/ago/pps-tools.git (attached) - which is missing. I copied it into /usr/include and then configure/make builds ntpd with the ATOM refclock (PPS) support. Tested with Linux 2.6.38 and ntp-4.2.6.p2+dfsg