Incomplete for too long. No detail given why this should be
specifically filed against Baltix.
** Changed in: baltix
Status: Incomplete = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Oneiric is no longer supported.
** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Status: Confirmed = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/831768
Title:
aptitude cannot handle
This bug was fixed in the package aptitude - 0.6.6-1ubuntu1.2
---
aptitude (0.6.6-1ubuntu1.2) precise-proposed; urgency=low
* Apply upstream multiarch-conflicts.patch to handle conflicts on
multi-arch systems. (LP: #831768)
-- Daniel Hartwig mand...@gmail.com Thu, 08 Nov
aptitude_0.6.6-1ubuntu1.2_amd64 from precise-proposed fixes this issue
for me.
I checked by trying to install wine. The dependency resolution only
grumbles about one “recommends” which can't be resolved, which is
probably okay. Before it would try to remove (almost?) every package
installed.
**
On 22 April 2013 18:38, Stephan Springer launchpa...@lini.de wrote:
I checked by trying to install wine. The dependency resolution only
grumbles about one “recommends” which can't be resolved, which is
probably okay.
gettext?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Yes:
Actions Undo Package Resolver Search Options Views Help
C-T: Menu ?: Help q: Quit u: Update g: Download/Install/Remove Pkgs
Packages Resolve
Dependencies
--\ Keep the following packages at their current version:
On 22 April 2013 20:30, Stephan Springer launchpa...@lini.de wrote:
Yes:
See bug #954029. Trivial fix, could be SRU.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/831768
Title:
aptitude cannot
The newly uploaded 0.6.6-1ubuntu1.2 version works perfectly for me on a
reasonably complicated Precise server with a mixture of i386 and amd64
packages.
Upon starting aptitude, it immediately started complaining about broken
packages and all sorts of fixes that it wanted to apply to fix all sorts
Hello Micah, or anyone else affected,
Accepted aptitude into precise-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptitude/0.6.6-1ubuntu1.2 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/precise-proposed/aptitude
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/831768
Title:
aptitude cannot handle conflicts with multiarch enabled
To manage notifications
This has been sitting in the queue for ages. It's a shame that we
haven't gotten around to uploading this by now (admittedly I myself have
had a sponsoring session or two in this time and didn't touch it). I'm
building aptitude now and will upload to precise-proposed if it passes
smoke tests.
So, sponsoring to precise, for what it's worth. I couldn't do much
meaningful local testing with multi-arch, possibly because I have some
core-ish packages built for amd64 but not i386 in a local repo.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Done. Unsubscribing sponsors now. Please resubscribe if there's anything
else for us to do, such as sponsoring to Q if a debdiff is provided.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/831768
Laney, pretty sure it was already fixed in Q,via upstream.
I tested it quite extensively, way back when I was patching ppa-purge.
No longer have a precise box to test on though.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
On 17 April 2013 17:25, Tim t...@feathertop.org wrote:
Laney, pretty sure it was already fixed in Q,via upstream.
Confirm this, with upstream hat on. The fix appears from version
0.6.8.1.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
Okey doke. The bug still asks for a fix for Oneiric, but I don't know if
anyone will be interested in that any more. Thanks!
** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu Precise)
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
** Description changed:
[Impact]
* Inability to use aptitude on multi-arch systems. Any action which
results in a packaging conflict, or otherwise broken package, invokes
the problem resolver which will proceed to remove *all* foreign-arch
packages.
The packages are removed
It's a bit scary and would need a lot of testing, but the very poor
state of aptitude on multiarch systems in affected releases is a
sufficient reason to try for an SRU; so, Dmitrijs or other sponsors, go
ahead and upload.
(However, I would suggest removing the Lack of upstream support
section
** Description changed:
[Impact]
* Inability to use aptitude on multi-arch systems. Any action which
results in a packaging conflict, or otherwise broken package, invokes
the problem resolver which will proceed to remove *all* foreign-arch
packages.
The packages are removed
Ubuntu SRU Team
Based on the date of your subscription (2012-11-08) the fix /would/ be
one of the five oldest entries in the unapproved queue for Precise. It
does not appear in that queue as ubuntu-sponsors have declined to upload
without prior consideration by your team.
Please consider the
@ Ubuntu SRU Team
Subscribing ubuntu-sru-team.
The precise.debdiff attached to this bug-report is ready for upload into
proposed. But there is no clear consensus if such an update is inline
with SRU requirements. Can you please review and evaluate the rist of
this SRU.
--
You received this bug
I'm going to unsubscribe the sponsors team until someone from the SRU
team can verify this is the sort of patch that would be accepted. I'd
like to get it off the sponsors queue, since there is not anything
immediately actionable here from that front.
If you can get buy-in from the SRU team,
[1] indicates to have a sponsor upload to -proposed before the Sru team
will review. It states there is no need to wait. The package is unusable
on m-a systems, in Ubuntu main, this upload is a self-contained fix: why
you consider it so unsuitable?
If the package does not get to -proposed, how
I have tested the precise patch in combination with my ppa-purge patch
(Bug #892886), and everything seems to be working smoothly as far as
purging packages on a multiarch precise system now.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
** Patch removed: precise.debdiff
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptitude/+bug/831768/+attachment/3427352/+files/precise.debdiff
** Patch added: precise.debdiff
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptitude/+bug/831768/+attachment/3429394/+files/precise.debdiff
--
You
** Description changed:
[Impact]
* Inability to use aptitude on multi-arch systems. Any action which
results in a packaging conflict, or otherwise broken package, invokes
the problem resolver which will proceed to remove *all* foreign-arch
packages.
The packages are removed
On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 09:08:34AM +0800, Daniel Hartwig wrote:
As someone familiar with the issue I request that you reopen those
tasks to their previous status and immediately assign them to cjwatson
(previously assigned) or someone else who is informed about this bug.
Please don't assign
According to comments here, the 0.6.8.1 release is considered fine for
inclusion in quantal by the release team and works for everyone that has
tested it. So after some quick smoke tests of my own, I've uploaded it
to quantal.
According to comment 104, SRUs are not necessarily requested by this
This bug was fixed in the package aptitude - 0.6.8.1-2ubuntu1
---
aptitude (0.6.8.1-2ubuntu1) quantal; urgency=low
* Resynchronise with Debian to pick up multi-arch fixes (LP: #831768).
Remaining changes:
- debian/05aptitude: Never autoremove kernels.
- Drop
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/aptitude
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/831768
Title:
aptitude cannot handle conflicts with multiarch enabled
To manage notifications about this bug go
On 4 October 2012 22:14, Michael Terry michael.te...@canonical.com wrote:
So after some quick smoke tests of my own, I've uploaded it
to quantal.
Appreciated.
According to comment 104, SRUs are not necessarily requested by this
bug.
From that comment, with emphasis added:
This is
Not being sure about the candidacy should you rather leave it open to
be adjusted by someone who is?
Saying I wasn't sure was a polite way to say that it didn't seem like a
good candidate to me, but I'm happy to have someone else that thinks
otherwise push them in.
Additionally, I had read
@Daniel, this is apt-get output:
http://pastebin.com/XBy5CbSH
If you wish to pursue this as an issue file a new report as your
experience is not that covered by this bug.
Ok, before I will continue experimenting with aptitude
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
I think (maybe) the problem is finally fixed with v0.6.8.1
As you know, ppa-purge used aptitude. I have updated the system with the
Xorg Edgers PPA repository. I installed aptitude v0.6.8.1 in Kubuntu 12.04
Precise. Then ppa-purge has been able to resolve dependencies. It uninstalled
google
Then ppa-purge has been able to resolve dependencies
I mean using ppa-purge with Xorg Edgers PPA.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/831768
Title:
aptitude cannot handle conflicts with
Sorry, I've rushed.
Now aptitude v0.6.8.1 on Precise can not resolve dependencies when trying to
install Google Earth:
http://pastebin.com/eu2ua79c
apt-get can install without problems.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
On 3 October 2012 03:27, YAFU 831...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote:
Sorry, I've rushed.
Now aptitude v0.6.8.1 on Precise can not resolve dependencies when trying
to install Google Earth:
http://pastebin.com/eu2ua79c
The proposed solution there looks fine to me, remove some -dev and
misc.
As 0.6.8.1 version of aptitude fixed that bug I merged it into version
for quantal. Please check package from
http://tygrysek.juszkiewicz.com.pl/~hrw/ubuntu/
Is a backport for precise available? Is anyone working on this?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Thanks, yes please include a debdiff, and a couple SRU fields still need
to be filled out. Please re-subscribe ubuntu-sponsors when this work
has been completed.
** Description changed:
- TEST CASE:
+ [Impact]
+
+ [Fix]
+
+ [Test Case]
1. Enable multiarch (should be automatic on new oneiric
The details on the sponsorship overview are incorrect. This is
currently only a request to get the fixed version (0.6.8.1) merged in
Quantal. As per the previous comment, that release is only a bug fix.
** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu Precise)
Status: Incomplete = Confirmed
--
You
** Patch added: debdiff for quantal
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/precise/+source/aptitude/+bug/831768/+attachment/3313663/+files/aptitude.ubuntu.deb.diff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Description changed:
[Impact]
+ * Inability to use aptitude on multi-arch systems. Any action which
+ results in a packaging conflict, or otherwise broken package, invokes
+ the problem resolver which will proceed to remove *all* foreign-arch
+ packages.
+
+ The packages are removed
** Description changed:
[Impact]
* Inability to use aptitude on multi-arch systems. Any action which
results in a packaging conflict, or otherwise broken package, invokes
the problem resolver which will proceed to remove *all* foreign-arch
packages.
The packages are removed
As 0.6.8.1 version of aptitude fixed that bug I merged it into version
for quantal. Please check package from
http://tygrysek.juszkiewicz.com.pl/~hrw/ubuntu/
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Branch linked: lp:debian/aptitude
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/831768
Title:
aptitude cannot handle conflicts with multiarch enabled
To manage notifications about this bug go
** Changed in: aptitude (Debian)
Status: Confirmed = Fix Released
** Changed in: aptitude
Status: Confirmed = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/831768
Title:
Thanks Marcin. This release doesn't seem to need an FFe as it looks like
bugfix only, so I've swapped the subscription to ubuntu-sponsors for
you. I suggest you attach a debdiff over Debian to make sponsoring
easier.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
** Changed in: aptitude (Debian)
Status: Unknown = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/831768
Title:
aptitude cannot handle conflicts with multiarch enabled
To manage
An update for Oneiric should also include the fixes for other serious
multi-arch issues. At least Bug #845136 and Bug #904486. Without these
multi-arch on that release is still effectively broken; IMO those bugs
should be nominated also for Oneiric.
The specific patches for those issues may be
For me multiarch-conflicts.patch seems to work fine and aptitude now
doesn't want to remove all my foreign arch packages anymore.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/831768
Title:
Thanks everyone. I think we have enough user confirmations of the patch
now.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/831768
Title:
aptitude cannot handle conflicts with multiarch enabled
To
I got time to build 0.6.8 with the patch applied, now that 0.6.8 is in
Ubuntu. (It's great having bug 824708 fixed.)
It continues to work for me. I can't trigger the remove-all-multiarch
behavior. I've tried marking important packages like apt, unity, or
libc6 for removal, and it only shows me
(I should write more carefully and call it remove all foreign arch
behavior. At any rate, it's gone. Thanks.)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/831768
Title:
aptitude cannot handle
** Tags added: patch
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/831768
Title:
aptitude cannot handle conflicts with multiarch enabled
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
On 7 August 2012 13:44, Fyodor Kupchik 831...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote:
After update went successfully I downloaded new skype package
from skype.com i386 version and installed it. Everything went OK!
So here's is *definitely improvement* for me and disabling the
option in /etc/apt/apt.conf
Thanks, Daniel. Hopefully I'll have some time to build and test against
0.6.8, soon. In the meantime, with the patched 0.6.6, I dealt with a
bunch of dependency problems today, and the patch continued to work
fine. The resolver came up a lot, and never wanted to remove my
foreign-arch packages.
Fyodor, you reported “no improvement.” Are you able to provide an update
given my previous response?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/831768
Title:
aptitude cannot handle conflicts
Hi, Daniel!
Sorry for late answer, I was not able to reach my workstation to test better
new patch. What I did today:
I disabled the hack mentioned in bug description, run aptitude and it showed
Suggest 228 removals 27 keeps. That is because after last update I did (don't
remember exactly if
Hi Daniel, thanks for the patch! It looks good to me so far.
I patched and built the current version from Quantal, 0.6.6-1ubuntu2.
In the fullscreen text interface, I played around, marking needed
packages for deletion. The resolver only showed the actual dependencies
as problems, and didn't
On 6 August 2012 03:15, Edward Donovan launch...@numble.net wrote:
(I tried to build it against 0.6.8 from the debian source, but the gtest
stuff wouldn't build. I was compiling it with dpkg-buildpackage, and
couldn't find how to skip building those tests.)
After review of the changes between
** Changed in: aptitude (Debian)
Importance: Undecided = Unknown
** Changed in: aptitude (Debian)
Status: New = Unknown
** Changed in: aptitude (Debian)
Remote watch: None = Debian Bug tracker #672340
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
Daniel, thank you for the patch!
Just finished building 0.6.6 with multiarch-conflicts.patch applied. Run
aptitude and update went OK. However, after update and pressing CTRL+G I see
that aptitude still unable to understand that libqt4-gui both i386 and amd64
can coesist like apt-get does.
On 4 August 2012 17:12, Fyodor Kupchik 831...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote:
However, after update
and pressing CTRL+G I see that aptitude still unable to
understand that libqt4-gui both i386 and amd64 can coesist
like apt-get does.
libqt4-gui is not multi-arch: same and apt-get does not support
Guys offering money bounty's to solve the Aptitude multiarch problem
please make sure you Donate to Daniel Burrows (the writer of Aptitude)
http://algebraicthunk.net/~dburrows/projects/aptitude/donating/
A large influx of donations with a mention of please fix multiarch might
be a great
Given the need for upstream work, nothing else is going to realistically
get done for .1, although I've left it at precise-updates in case some
backportable upstream work happens later. (I can't do any more myself,
so unassigning myself.)
** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu Precise)
Milestone:
I've chipped in at $56.09, raising it to $222.35.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/831768
Title:
aptitude cannot handle conflicts with multiarch enabled
To manage notifications about
Thanks for the hint, Daniel.
I have been using aptitude for over 10 years now. It's still the best
package manager I know and I hate seeing it deteriorate in such a way.
That's why I have offered 100€ on Fossfactory for fixing this bug[1]. I
know this is alone is not enough. But 333 people are
** Changed in: aptitude
Status: New = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/831768
Title:
aptitude cannot handle conflicts with multiarch enabled
To manage notifications
Colin, is there any more that can realistically be done here for .1?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/831768
Title:
aptitude cannot handle conflicts with multiarch enabled
To manage
** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu Precise)
Milestone: ubuntu-12.04 = ubuntu-12.04.1
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/831768
Title:
aptitude cannot handle conflicts with multiarch
The only time I use aptitude is to remove all redundant files as in:
aptitude purge ~c
Is there an equivalent that uses apt-get instead?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/831768
Title:
Dealing with the problem resolver is difficult and time consuming. A
project has been start on fossfactory.org to fund work on this bug. The
aim of fossfactory.org is for interested users to pledge funds to
attract developers to work on the projects they care about. When a
particular feature or
** Description changed:
TEST CASE:
1. Enable multiarch (should be automatic on new oneiric systems)
2. Install an i386 package on amd64 (like flashplugin-installer:i386)
3. Mark something with a lot of dependencies for installation
4. On the confirmation screen, try to remove on of the
Maybe I misunderstand the meaning of the importance bit. I thought it
was importance to the functioning of this package, so that availability
of other package managers is irrelevant to its setting.
While changing the bug's importance doesn't change anyone's priorities
in fixing aptitude, it does
** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu)
Milestone: ubuntu-12.04 = None
** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Colin Watson (cjwatson) = (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Changed in: aptitude
Status: Unknown = New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/831768
Title:
aptitude cannot handle conflicts with multiarch enabled
To manage notifications
This is a very serious issue. I just upgraded to 12.04 and currenly I
cannot even install wine without getting dependency errors. apt-get want
me to resolve it by removing about 200 packages. I vote to give this bug
critical status.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #672340
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=672340
** Changed in: aptitude
Importance: Undecided = Unknown
** Changed in: aptitude
Status: New = Unknown
** Changed in: aptitude
Remote watch: None = Debian Bug tracker #672340
--
The problem still happens in Kubuntu 12.04 Precise Pangolin. For example
after installing programs that require 32bit libraries (google earth,
skype, TV-Maxe). Then if you do sudo aptitude -f install then
aptitude does not know how to resolve dependencies and it wants to
remove some important
** Description changed:
TEST CASE:
1. Enable multiarch (should be automatic on new oneiric systems)
2. Install an i386 package on amd64 (like flashplugin-installer:i386)
3. Mark something with a lot of dependencies for installation
4. On the confirmation screen, try to remove on of the
On 27 April 2012 11:12, Daniel Hartwig 831...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote:
** Description changed:
TEST CASE:
1. Enable multiarch (should be automatic on new oneiric systems)
2. Install an i386 package on amd64 (like flashplugin-installer:i386)
3. Mark something with a lot of dependencies
This is not specific to multiarch.
Agreed, though this test case is. I have only included the workaround
in the description as many users are likely to land here due to the
release notes.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
** Changed in: aptitude
Importance: Unknown = Undecided
** Changed in: aptitude
Status: Fix Released = New
** Changed in: aptitude
Remote watch: Debian Bug tracker #661744 = None
** Changed in: aptitude (Debian)
Importance: Unknown = Undecided
** Changed in: aptitude (Debian)
Also, this report does not need more comments about:
- the mention in 12.04 release notes, including the wording;
- whether the resolver is generally working or not working; or
- whether aptitude works or not with multi-arch.
I have today unmerged ~4 bugs which were not related to the issue
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Daniel Hartwig
831...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote:
Also, this report does not need more comments about:
Sorry, Daniel. Overexcited about aptitude. :)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Dear Friends,
From Ubuntu precise release notes:
Aptitude does not work on 64-bit systems without disabling multiarch in
/etc/dpkg/dpkg.cfg.d/multiarch . (831768)
This is wrong! Aptitude works now!
Thanks and Blessings,
Shahar
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 03:05:20PM -, Shahar Or wrote:
This is wrong! Aptitude works now!
The logs of this bug are distinctly ambiguous on the subject :-)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
On 26 April 2012 18:37, Colin Watson cjwat...@canonical.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 03:05:20PM -, Shahar Or wrote:
This is wrong! Aptitude works now!
The logs of this bug are distinctly ambiguous on the subject :-)
I informed the release team about it.
Thanks.
--
You
Well it was still broken yesterday evening ;-)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/831768
Title:
aptitude cannot handle conflicts with multiarch enabled
To manage notifications about
On 26 April 2012 20:35, Swâmi Petaramesh 831...@bugs.launchpad.net
wrote:
Well it was still broken yesterday evening ;-)
It's resolver is not so hot but to say that it does not work is a bit
misleading!
--
You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
report.
I know this isn't a referendum, I just found these two cents in my
pocket.
Shahar wrote:
It's resolver is not so hot but to say that it does not work is a bit
misleading!
For what little it's worth, it looks that way to me, too. I can only
see that aptitude 'works' on a level it had not
On Apr 27, 2012 2:10 AM, Edward Donovan 831...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote:
I know this isn't a referendum, I just found these two cents in my
pocket.
Shahar wrote:
It's resolver is not so hot but to say that it does not work is a bit
misleading!
For what little it's worth, it looks that way
** Changed in: baltix
Status: Invalid = Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/831768
Title:
aptitude cannot handle conflicts with multiarch enabled
To manage
cjwatson wrote:
I'm uploading 0.6.6-1ubuntu1 to precise now. However, I'm not closing
this bug at this point, because I'm not convinced it entirely fixes it
(and upstream doesn't appear to truly claim that it does).
Correct -- as previously mentioned, the problem resolver is not
intelligent in
** Tags removed: rls-p-tracking
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/831768
Title:
aptitude cannot handle conflicts with multiarch enabled
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
On 3 April 2012 23:12, Shahar Or mightyiamprese...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Anders, Philip, Michal, Friends,
I've filed individual bugs for the two issues that you mentioned,
Anders.
Is there a Well, the resolver is a mess. bug report :) ? Really, is
there? Launchpad or upstream Debian? Please
Dear Anders, Philip, Michal, Friends,
I've filed individual bugs for the two issues that you mentioned,
Anders.
Is there a Well, the resolver is a mess. bug report :) ? Really, is
there? Launchpad or upstream Debian? Please give pointers if you have
them.
Thanks and Blessings,
Shahar
--
You
Oh, here they are:
Bug #972858 and Bug #972847.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/831768
Title:
aptitude cannot handle conflicts with multiarch enabled
To manage notifications about
Well, the resolver is a mess.
That's regardless of multiarch.
That's a bunch of separate issues.
Maybe it does work worse on multiarch but it works poorly under any
conditions so it's hard to tell.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
While the situation has definitely improved as you can now install
multiarch packages from aptitude, the depenceny resolver is still a
mess. Attached is a log with a few packages having unresolved
dependencies because they're from a work-in-progress archive. The full
resolver gives many internal
1 - 100 of 171 matches
Mail list logo
