[Bug 83461] Re: pack does not support Q, but perl supports 64 bit scalars

2009-08-14 Thread vericgar
I just ran into this bug in Jaunty - perhaps a regression? Currently in: [ /home/vericgar/gps ] veric...@eagle $ cat /etc/lsb-release DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu DISTRIB_RELEASE=9.04

[Bug 83461] Re: pack does not support Q, but perl supports 64 bit scalars

2008-09-20 Thread Daniel T Chen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ $ perl -e 'print 2**38, \n;' 274877906944 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ $ perl -e 'print unpack(Q, pack(Q, 2**38)),\n;' 274877906944 ** Changed in: perl (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released -- pack does not support Q, but perl supports 64 bit scalars

[Bug 83461] Re: pack does not support Q, but perl supports 64 bit scalars

2008-09-20 Thread Nikolaus Rath
Which perl version are you using? Hardy or intrepid? Is there an updated hardy version available somewhere, so that I can test it as well? -- pack does not support Q, but perl supports 64 bit scalars https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/83461 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 83461] Re: pack does not support Q, but perl supports 64 bit scalars

2008-09-10 Thread Nikolaus Rath
Yes, this is still an issue here. Where you not able to reproduce it? ** Changed in: perl (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = Confirmed ** Changed in: perl (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = New -- pack does not support Q, but perl supports 64 bit scalars https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/83461

[Bug 83461] Re: pack does not support Q, but perl supports 64 bit scalars

2008-08-16 Thread Andreas Moog
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. You reported this bug a while ago and there hasn't been any activity in it recently. We were wondering is this still an issue for you? Can you try with latest Ubuntu release? Thanks in advance. ** Changed in: perl

[Bug 83461] Re: pack does not support Q, but perl supports 64 bit scalars

2008-02-05 Thread cnd
nokile:~$ perl -e 'print unpack(I, pack(I, 2**38)),\n;' 4294967295 2**38 is not 4294967295 - it's 274877906944 The internal Int size of your perl is 32bits. I agree tho - Q should work, regardless of what your int size is. -- pack does not support Q, but perl supports 64 bit scalars

[Bug 83461] Re: pack does not support Q, but perl supports 64 bit scalars

2008-02-05 Thread Steve Peters
To handle 64 bit ints, Perl would have needed to be configured correctly to handle it. A perl -V would help to answer that question. -- pack does not support Q, but perl supports 64 bit scalars https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/83461 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 83461] Re: pack does not support Q, but perl supports 64 bit scalars

2008-02-05 Thread Nikolaus Rath
[0] nokile:~$ perl -V Summary of my perl5 (revision 5 version 8 subversion 8) configuration: Platform: osname=linux, osvers=2.6.15.7, archname=i486-linux-gnu-thread-multi uname='linux terranova 2.6.15.7 #1 smp thu jul 12 14:27:56 utc 2007 i686 gnulinux ' config_args='-Dusethreads

[Bug 83461] Re: pack does not support Q, but perl supports 64 bit scalars

2008-02-05 Thread Nikolaus Rath
nokile:~$ perl -e 'print unpack(I, pack(I, 2**38)),\n;' 4294967295 2**38 is not 4294967295 - it's 274877906944 That's what I'm saying. pack and unpackt don't handle 64 bits. The internal Int size of your perl is 32bits. No, that's not true. Look at my first example, it gives the correct