oneiric has seen the end of its life and is no longer receiving any
updates. Marking the oneiric task for this ticket as Won't Fix.
** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Status: Triaged = Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
oneiric has seen the end of its life and is no longer receiving any
updates. Marking the oneiric task for this ticket as Won't Fix.
** Changed in: perl (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Status: Confirmed = Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
oneiric has seen the end of its life and is no longer receiving any
updates. Marking the oneiric task for this ticket as Won't Fix.
** Changed in: update-inetd (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Status: Confirmed = Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
** Changed in: samba
Status: New = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862129
Title:
samba postrm depends on packages not guaranteed to be configured
To manage
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: perl (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862129
Title:
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: update-inetd (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862129
perl-modules: /usr/share/perl/5.12.4/File/Temp.pm
darkrain@vortex:~$ dpkg -s perl-modules update-inetd
Package: perl-modules
Status: install ok unpacked
Priority: standard
Section: perl
Installed-Size: 24832
Maintainer: Ubuntu Developers ubuntu-devel-disc...@lists.ubuntu.com
Architecture: all
** Changed in: perl (Debian)
Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862129
Title:
samba postrm depends on packages not guaranteed to be configured
** Changed in: perl (Debian)
Status: New = Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862129
Title:
samba postrm depends on packages not guaranteed to be configured
To
** Changed in: perl (Debian)
Status: Unknown = New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862129
Title:
samba postrm depends on packages not guaranteed to be configured
To manage
** Changed in: update-inetd (Debian)
Status: Unknown = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862129
Title:
samba postrm depends on packages not guaranteed to be
I'd prefer to fix this in update-inetd + perl rather than update-manager
for alpha-1, as discussed.
** Changed in: perl (Ubuntu Precise)
Importance: Undecided = High
** Changed in: perl (Ubuntu Precise)
Status: New = Triaged
** Changed in: perl (Ubuntu Precise)
Milestone: None =
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/perl
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862129
Title:
samba postrm depends on packages not guaranteed to be configured
To manage notifications about this bug
This bug was fixed in the package perl - 5.14.2-5ubuntu1
---
perl (5.14.2-5ubuntu1) precise; urgency=low
* Break older versions of update-inetd to avoid File::Temp and File::Copy
binary-incompatibility issues during upgrades (LP: #862129).
-- Colin Watson cjwat...@ubuntu.com
** Branch linked: lp:debian/update-inetd
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862129
Title:
samba postrm depends on packages not guaranteed to be configured
To manage notifications about
This bug was fixed in the package update-inetd - 4.41
---
update-inetd (4.41) unstable; urgency=low
* Fall back to external 'tempfile' and 'mv' commands in case perl-base and
perl-modules are out of sync during an upgrade (Closes: #649174;
LP: #862129). Thanks to Colin
I've suggested a patch to update-inetd to make it tolerate perl-base
/perl-modules desync, and an added Breaks in perl-base to match this;
see the linked Debian bug reports. I think that if we did this we could
avoid needing to change update-manager, since apt would install the
improved
** Changed in: update-inetd (Ubuntu Precise)
Importance: Undecided = High
** Changed in: update-inetd (Ubuntu Precise)
Status: New = Triaged
** Changed in: update-inetd (Ubuntu Precise)
Milestone: ubuntu-12.04 = precise-alpha-1
--
You received this bug notification because you
** Changed in: update-inetd (Ubuntu Precise)
Milestone: None = ubuntu-12.04
** Changed in: update-inetd (Ubuntu Precise)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Canonical Foundations Team
(canonical-foundations)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
** Tags added: rls-p-tracking
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862129
Title:
samba postrm depends on packages not guaranteed to be configured
To manage notifications about this bug go
bug 877852 is a secondary tracking bug.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862129
Title:
samba postrm depends on packages not guaranteed to be configured
To manage notifications about
Analysis of the upgrade logs and further discussion on IRC shows that
it's infeasible to fix this in samba. The problem arises when perl-
modules is unpacked without libperl5.12/perl-base, and then samba is
unpacked. Moving the update-inetd code from the postrm to the prerm may
help in some
Analysis of the upgrade logs and further discussion on IRC shows that
it's infeasible to fix this in samba. The problem arises when perl-
modules is unpacked without libperl5.12/perl-base, and then samba is
unpacked. Moving the update-inetd code from the postrm to the prerm may
help in some
Given the number of dupes, shouldn't this be raised to a Critical level?
This has now broken dozens of upgrades that we know about, and I'm sure
many more that haven't bothered to report it.
Robie's suggestion to simplify update-inetd, given that these are very
primitive elements, seems the best
Given the number of dupes, shouldn't this be raised to a Critical level?
This has now broken dozens of upgrades that we know about, and I'm sure
many more that haven't bothered to report it.
Robie's suggestion to simplify update-inetd, given that these are very
primitive elements, seems the best
I discussed this bug at length with Adam on Friday afternoon. Adam is on
vacation now so I'll try and reproduce my memory and conclusions from
this conversation.
Some thoughts from that discussion:
1) perl-modules (which provides File::Temp) seems to spend a lot of time
unconfigured in the
** Tags added: rls-mgr-p-tracking
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862129
Title:
samba postrm depends on packages not guaranteed to be configured
To manage
I discussed this bug at length with Adam on Friday afternoon. Adam is on
vacation now so I'll try and reproduce my memory and conclusions from
this conversation.
Some thoughts from that discussion:
1) perl-modules (which provides File::Temp) seems to spend a lot of time
unconfigured in the
** Tags added: rls-mgr-p-tracking
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862129
Title:
samba postrm depends on packages not guaranteed to be configured
To manage notifications about this
** Tags added: regression-release
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862129
Title:
samba postrm depends on packages not guaranteed to be configured
To manage
** Also affects: samba (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: samba (Ubuntu Precise)
Importance: High
Status: Triaged
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Status: New = Triaged
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Importance:
** Tags added: regression-release
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862129
Title:
samba postrm depends on packages not guaranteed to be configured
To manage notifications about this
** Also affects: samba (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: samba (Ubuntu Precise)
Importance: High
Status: Triaged
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Status: New = Triaged
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Importance:
Historically, we wait for postrm before calling update-inetd --remove
because the enabled/disabled status of an inetd service is admin
configuration data, so we only want to remove it on purge.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is
I catch your point, Steve, but doesn't it seem silly to have an enabled
service in inted that references binaries that no longer exist on disk?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
Or is this being triggered by upgrading/mangling samba in the middle of
perl transitions? I think I need to look more deeply into the dupes and
see what's going on here, cause I refuse to believe a ton of people are
doing this on purpose.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
And it occurs to me that I maintain a package that calls update-inetd in
postrm too. Hrm. Did it used to fail more gracefully when it wasn't
fully configured? This may need a more general looking-at rather than
just samba (though I do find it curious that samba users in particular
seem to so
but doesn't it seem silly to have an enabled service in inetd
that references binaries that no longer exist on disk?
Well, it's possible to use a different marker for package-level
disabling vs. admin-level disabling of a service... note that the postrm
*always* disables it when we're not
Historically, we wait for postrm before calling update-inetd --remove
because the enabled/disabled status of an inetd service is admin
configuration data, so we only want to remove it on purge.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
I catch your point, Steve, but doesn't it seem silly to have an enabled
service in inted that references binaries that no longer exist on disk?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862129
And it occurs to me that I maintain a package that calls update-inetd in
postrm too. Hrm. Did it used to fail more gracefully when it wasn't
fully configured? This may need a more general looking-at rather than
just samba (though I do find it curious that samba users in particular
seem to so
Or is this being triggered by upgrading/mangling samba in the middle of
perl transitions? I think I need to look more deeply into the dupes and
see what's going on here, cause I refuse to believe a ton of people are
doing this on purpose.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
but doesn't it seem silly to have an enabled service in inetd
that references binaries that no longer exist on disk?
Well, it's possible to use a different marker for package-level
disabling vs. admin-level disabling of a service... note that the postrm
*always* disables it when we're not
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Milestone: ubuntu-11.10 = oneiric-updates
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862129
Title:
samba postrm depends on packages not
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Milestone: ubuntu-11.10 = oneiric-updates
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862129
Title:
samba postrm depends on packages not guaranteed to be
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #644963
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=644963
** Also affects: samba via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=644963
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
** Changed in: samba
Status: Unknown = New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862129
Title:
samba postrm depends on packages not guaranteed to be configured
To
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #644963
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=644963
** Also affects: samba via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=644963
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
** Changed in: samba
Status: Unknown = New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862129
Title:
samba postrm depends on packages not guaranteed to be configured
To manage
The attached script reproduces the problem on a minimal fresh oneiric
install.
** Attachment added: test.sh
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/862129/+attachment/2534711/+files/test.sh
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team,
** Branch linked: lp:~racb/ubuntu/oneiric/samba/862129
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862129
Title:
samba postrm depends on packages not guaranteed to be configured
Surely, we can just move the update-inetd call to prerm? I can't
imagine why you'd want to wait around for postrm before calling it
anyway.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
The attached script reproduces the problem on a minimal fresh oneiric
install.
** Attachment added: test.sh
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/862129/+attachment/2534711/+files/test.sh
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
** Branch linked: lp:~racb/ubuntu/oneiric/samba/862129
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862129
Title:
samba postrm depends on packages not guaranteed to be configured
To manage
Surely, we can just move the update-inetd call to prerm? I can't
imagine why you'd want to wait around for postrm before calling it
anyway.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862129
** Summary changed:
- package samba 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2.3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
new post-removal script returned error exit status 2
+ samba postrm depends on packages not guaranteed to be configured
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
I'm thinking along the lines of the attached patch (untested). Some
questions:
1) Is this the right approach?
2) Is dpkg-query the right way to get the status of the update-inetd package?
3) What about triggers-awaiting and triggers-pending? What should the behaviour
be in these cases? Is it OK
The attachment Untested patch of this bug report has been identified
as being a patch. The ubuntu-reviewers team has been subscribed to the
bug report so that they can review the patch. In the event that this is
in fact not a patch you can resolve this situation by removing the tag
'patch' from
** Summary changed:
- package samba 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2.3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
new post-removal script returned error exit status 2
+ samba postrm depends on packages not guaranteed to be configured
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
I'm thinking along the lines of the attached patch (untested). Some
questions:
1) Is this the right approach?
2) Is dpkg-query the right way to get the status of the update-inetd package?
3) What about triggers-awaiting and triggers-pending? What should the behaviour
be in these cases? Is it OK
The attachment Untested patch of this bug report has been identified
as being a patch. The ubuntu-reviewers team has been subscribed to the
bug report so that they can review the patch. In the event that this is
in fact not a patch you can resolve this situation by removing the tag
'patch' from
61 matches
Mail list logo
