$ ./change-override -c main -S run-one
Override component to main
run-one 1.16-0ubuntu1 in trusty: universe/admin -> main
run-one 1.16-0ubuntu1 in trusty amd64: universe/admin/optional/100% -> main
run-one 1.16-0ubuntu1 in trusty arm64: universe/admin/optional/100% -> main
run-one 1.16-0ubuntu1 in
@didrocks,
[ubuntu/trusty-proposed] byobu 5.65-0ubuntu1 (Accepted)
Thanks!
:-Dustin
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Launchpad Bug Tracker
<888...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote:
> ** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/trusty-proposed/byobu
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscrib
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/trusty-proposed/byobu
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/888770
Title:
[MIR] run-one
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/
** Branch linked: lp:byobu
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/888770
Title:
[MIR] run-one
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/run-one/
Great!
Approved then. Dustin, just ping me back once byobu is depending on it
and I'll just promote it.
** Changed in: run-one (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https:/
Re-assigning to Didier post ack from server-team.
Cheers
James
** Changed in: run-one (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Confirmed
** Changed in: run-one (Ubuntu)
Assignee: James Page (james-page) => Didier Roche (didrocks)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a memb
** Changed in: run-one (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Dustin Kirkland (kirkland) => James Page (james-page)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/888770
Title:
[MIR] run-one
To manage notificati
Thanks, @didrocks.
I have subscribed @jamespage, and he says he'll take a look.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/888770
Title:
[MIR] run-one
To manage notifications about this bug go
Hey Dustin, can you grab someone from the server team to ack this
change? All the rest looks ok to me, just want to have the consensus
with them. Please just reassign to me once done and I'll just +1 ;)
** Changed in: run-one (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Didier Roche (didrocks) => Dustin Kirkland (ki
Hi Didier,
I completely lost track of this. I have reformatted the copyright to
DEP-5, and release/uploaded run-one version 1.15, which should be
building in Trusty shortly. Thanks!
Dustin
** Changed in: run-one (Ubuntu)
Status: Expired => In Progress
** Changed in: run-one (Ubuntu)
[Expired for run-one (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60
days.]
** Changed in: run-one (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/888770
(please reassign to myself when there is an answer from Dave/Dustin)
** Changed in: run-one (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Didier Roche (didrocks) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bug
looked at the package and the code, all looks fine for promoting in main.
I would like to request that debian/copyright follows DEP-5 (see
http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/)
Just a small note, looking from the code, it's quite clear that the
matching is done in a unique set of argument. You are te
** Changed in: run-one (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Didier Roche (didrocks)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/888770
Title:
[MIR] run-one
To manage notifications about this b
runlock is insufficient, because it only takes into account the process
name, and not the arguments.
For instance, try this in terminal 1:
$ runlock sleep 100
And in terminal 2:
$ runlock sleep 200
Your second terminal's runlock will terminate with an error condition
because the "sleep" proces
Dustin, did you see my question?
Thanks.
** Changed in: run-one (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/888770
Title:
[MIR] run-one
To manage n
@Dustin,
I understand the problem that this MIR is trying to resolve, so a how-to
wasn't what I was asking. :)
I was really asking, why run-one is superior to the tools cronutils
provide?:
runlock: Prevent concurrent runs of a process.
runlock tries to hold an exclusive lock while it
Sure, Dave.
See:
*
http://blog.dustinkirkland.com/2011/02/introducing-run-one-and-run-this-one.html
Basically, imagine having a long running cronjob, like an rsync, that
might take an hour or more sometimes. But you want to run this
cronjob every, say 10 minutes. something like:
*/10 * * * *
@Dustin, Please can you provide some information on what run-one does
that cronutils doesn't?
Thanks.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/888770
Title:
[MIR] run-one
To manage notificati
19 matches
Mail list logo
