Right. Write a mail to our boss. Oh wait! -- slaps thigh -- we don't
have one.
Anyway, this is not a discussion forum. So please stop unrelated
discussion.
Thank you.
--
Please package Amarok Rio Karma support (--with-libkarma)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/89591
You received this bug
Perry E. Metzger wrote:
- When all was said and done, a bug that shouldn't have been
- closed without a discussion remains closed. Feel proud? You certainly
- showed that asshole user that he can't push maintainers around.
-
- Not that I care. Two nights ago I got a new gift from Ubuntu -- a
-
Amarok 2.0 no longer supports Rio Karma, so closing.
** Changed in: amarok (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Invalid
--
Please package Amarok Rio Karma support (--with-libkarma)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/89591
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu
Bugs,
What the ...???
You guys trying really hard to keep me away from Amarok 2 - Guess now you got
it :-(
Only one question: Why? Support less than more?
--
Please package Amarok Rio Karma support (--with-libkarma)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/89591
You received this bug notification because you
Way to go with the sensitive treatment of the community, Jon Thomas!
People sit around waiting for a couple of years for a support issue to
be fixed for their hardware, limping along when things could Just Work
with minimal effort. Therefore, the right thing is to say to yourself
oh, the new
Jonathan Thomas echidna...@kubuntu.org writes:
Amarok 2.0 no longer supports Rio Karma, so closing.
You know, in addition to the quality of your prose, I've gone over the
Amarok web site and I've been unable to find evidence that they dumped
Karma support. Not that (as I've noted) any of that
Perry: Please cool down. Jonathan is handling a few hundred bugs a day
sometimes. And the Kubuntu team has limited resources which need to be used
wisely. Would you rather have a new package/a fixed bug or him spending a lot
of time on a reply in a bugreport?
Help with finding more people to
See the last comment here: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=132713
--
Please package Amarok Rio Karma support (--with-libkarma)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/89591
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to amarok in ubuntu.
--
Lydia Pintscher lydia.pintsc...@gmail.com writes:
Perry: Please cool down. Jonathan is handling a few hundred bugs a
day sometimes.
So?
And the Kubuntu team has limited resources which need to be used
wisely. Would you rather have a new package/a fixed bug or him
spending a lot of time on
Jonathan Thomas echidna...@kubuntu.org writes:
See the last comment here: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=132713
Note the URL doesn't claim that it is policy not to support the Karma,
just that the work hasn't been done yet.
Lets forget that, though. There's a much deeper problem.
I did automount the following way:
edit the options of your media player in amarok and add the following lines:
before connect: kdesu mount /dev/sdb2 /media/karma/
after disconnect: kdesu umount /media/karma/
Labels might be different, don't know because i use the german translation :-)
This way
Following the previous directions (with a few difficulties -- I needed
to get the amarok_riokarma-mediadevice.desktop file out of the amarok
sources), I got my Karma working under Hardy. It would be nice to make
the thing automatically mount when it is plugged in (which I don't know
how to do) but
Okay, here's how to get karmaamarok working with Hardy:
1. install amarok and libkarma from ubuntu sources
2. download the OMFS module ver.0.7.6 from
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=155788package_id=175124
3. untar, make_modules, make_modules_install
4. download the amarok
Unsub'ing ubuntu-mir. Bug 174306 is the MIR bug.
--
Please package Amarok Rio Karma support (--with-libkarma)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/89591
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
** Changed in: amarok (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Sarah Hobbs (hobbsee) = (unassigned)
--
Please package Amarok Rio Karma support (--with-libkarma)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/89591
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu
Team, which is a bug contact for amarok in
I started it, and added it to the MIR queue
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MainInclusionReportlibkarma
--
Please package Amarok Rio Karma support (--with-libkarma)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/89591
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact
libkarma needs a MIR for this to happen.
--
Please package Amarok Rio Karma support (--with-libkarma)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/89591
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu
Team, which is a bug contact for amarok in ubuntu.
--
kubuntu-bugs mailing list
added to the list of MIR's needed. anyone feel like doing this MIR?
** Changed in: amarok (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Wishlist
Assignee: (unassigned) = Sarah Hobbs
--
Please package Amarok Rio Karma support (--with-libkarma)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/89591
You received this
I have opened a bug report to have omfs added to feisty:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/118300
--
Please package Amarok Rio Karma support (--with-libkarma)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/89591
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu
Team, which is a bug
Well, the Debian experimental package of Amarok is compiled with Rio Karma
support (search for version 1.4.5-3).
The libkarma0 is in the Ubuntu universe repository of feisty fawn, so all left
to do is recompiling Amarok with the --with-libkarma option and providing an
OMFS package, maybe just
Well if Debian's Amarok is compiled with libkarma and it works there, it
must be providing the OMFS package somewhere, right? Would a simple
sync of that package into Ubuntu make this just a change in the
debian/rules file problem?
--
Please package Amarok Rio Karma support (--with-libkarma)
I actually just saw omfs come through the gutsy changes list -
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/gutsy/+source/omfs/0.7.2-1
Looks like the only t hing to do now is enable --with-libkarma in
amarok's debian/rules file.
--
Please package Amarok Rio Karma support (--with-libkarma)
Hmm. Well, I've tried three times to raise a bug for OMFS today, but
keep seeing a Launchpad timeout error. Fortunately I think I was wrong
in saying it's required for this Amarok patch - it's just that this
patch won't be useful without it. Happily too, installing OMFS support
the old-fashioned
The libkarma packages are available in universe:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ aptitude show libkarma0
Package: libkarma0
State: installed
Automatically installed: no
Version: 0.0.6-0ubuntu1
Priority: extra
Section: universe/libs
Maintainer: Ubuntu MOTU Developers ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com
Uncompressed
Sorry, I was searching the edgy repo when I said libkarma0 was
unavailable. Please link the bug you raise for OMFS to this one so
people seeing that one can better understand the situation.
--
Please package Amarok Rio Karma support (--with-libkarma)
https://launchpad.net/bugs/89591
--
** Summary changed:
- Please package Amarok Rio Karma support
+ Please package Amarok Rio Karma support (--with-libkarma)
--
Please package Amarok Rio Karma support (--with-libkarma)
https://launchpad.net/bugs/89591
--
kubuntu-bugs mailing list
kubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Ah, thanks for taking a look Andrew. I clearly should have been a little
more explicit about what is required. I can't help thinking that
writing-up a spec for this change would be a little bureaucratic!
As you say, the --with-libkarma configuration flag is required. Three
new files will be
So it looks like there are 3 changes necessary:
1) packaging changes to debian/rules and debian.install
2) libkarma0 libkarma-dev packages
3) an OMFS package.
1 will be relatively easy, but 2 and 3 more difficult. As far as I'm
aware, libkarma0 and libkarma-dev packages don't exist in either
28 matches
Mail list logo
