[Bug 907055] Re: Clientron E830 Thin Client Needs LDVS removed

2012-06-08 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/precise-proposed/linux-armadaxp -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/907055 Title: Clientron E830 Thin Client Needs LDVS removed To manage notifications about

[Bug 907055] Re: Clientron E830 Thin Client Needs LDVS removed

2012-04-11 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/precise-proposed/linux-ti-omap4 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/907055 Title: Clientron E830 Thin Client Needs LDVS removed To manage notifications about

[Bug 907055] Re: Clientron E830 Thin Client Needs LDVS removed

2012-04-03 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/linux-armadaxp -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/907055 Title: Clientron E830 Thin Client Needs LDVS removed To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 907055] Re: Clientron E830 Thin Client Needs LDVS removed

2012-03-29 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package linux - 3.2.0-21.34 --- linux (3.2.0-21.34) precise; urgency=low [ AceLan Kao ] * SAUCE: (drop after 3.4) asus-wmi: add scalar board brightness adj. support - LP: #961879 * SAUCE: (drop after 3.4) asus-wmi: store backlight power status

[Bug 907055] Re: Clientron E830 Thin Client Needs LDVS removed

2012-03-28 Thread Tim Gardner
committed to precise: drm/i915: Add Clientron E830 to the ignore LVDS list ** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Precise) Importance: Medium Assignee: jsass (sass-joel) Status: Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 907055] Re: Clientron E830 Thin Client Needs LDVS removed

2012-02-14 Thread Joseph Salisbury
** Tags removed: kernel-da-key -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/907055 Title: Clientron E830 Thin Client Needs LDVS removed To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 907055] Re: Clientron E830 Thin Client Needs LDVS removed

2012-01-16 Thread jsass
Fix committed here: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/keithp/linux.git;a=commit;h=44306ab302687b519a31aa498b954c1e26f95a6b It will appear in a kernel patch relatively soon. ** Changed in: linux Status: New = Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 907055] Re: Clientron E830 Thin Client Needs LDVS removed

2012-01-12 Thread jsass
Merged to drm-intel-next-fixes. 8ca4013..44306ab drm-intel-next-fixes - drm-intel-next-fixes -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/907055 Title: Clientron E830 Thin Client Needs LDVS

[Bug 907055] Re: Clientron E830 Thin Client Needs LDVS removed

2012-01-10 Thread jsass
From: Joel Sass sass.j...@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Joel Sass js...@disklessworkstations.com Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c |8 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c

[Bug 907055] Re: Clientron E830 Thin Client Needs LDVS removed

2012-01-06 Thread jsass
Reviewed-by Adam Jackson on dri-devel mailing list. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = jsass (sass-joel) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/907055 Title:

[Bug 907055] Re: Clientron E830 Thin Client Needs LDVS removed

2012-01-04 Thread Joseph Salisbury
Can you provide some information on the status of the patch once you get a response from upstream? What sort of feedback has it received, is it getting applied to a subsystem maintainer's tree, etc? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 907055] Re: Clientron E830 Thin Client Needs LDVS removed

2012-01-04 Thread jsass
I just received my first response to the patch I filed this morning at 11:44AM (EST). The full response is as follows: --- ./intel_lvds.old2011-12-20 13:25:49.368291249 -0500 +++ ./intel_lvds.c2011-12-20 13:26:05.160291248 -0500 @@ -709,6 +709,14 @@ }, {

[Bug 907055] Re: Clientron E830 Thin Client Needs LDVS removed

2011-12-27 Thread Stéphane Graber
Discussed with jsass on IRC, suggested he forwards the patch by e-mail to dri-de...@lists.sf.net and posts the result of the discussion in the bug report so the fix can be cherry-picked when accepted. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 907055] Re: Clientron E830 Thin Client Needs LDVS removed

2011-12-27 Thread Stéphane Graber
Disabled the bot as the bug affects any given kernel, so we don't need the extra flood. This is an almost identical fix to what I did for the Clientron U800 back in Lucid. Can someone in the kernel team have a quick look to see if it looks and if so, forward the patch upstream? In my

[Bug 907055] Re: Clientron E830 Thin Client Needs LDVS removed

2011-12-27 Thread jsass
** Bug watch added: Email to dri-devel@lists # mailto:dri-de...@lists.sourceforge.net ** Also affects: linux via mailto:dri-de...@lists.sourceforge.net Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 907055] Re: Clientron E830 Thin Client Needs LDVS removed

2011-12-27 Thread jsass
Submitted upstream to dri-devel -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/907055 Title: Clientron E830 Thin Client Needs LDVS removed To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 907055] Re: Clientron E830 Thin Client Needs LDVS removed

2011-12-24 Thread Brad Figg
Thank you for taking the time to file a bug report on this issue. However, given the number of bugs that the Kernel Team receives during any development cycle it is impossible for us to review them all. Therefore, we occasionally resort to using automated bots to request further testing. This is

[Bug 907055] Re: Clientron E830 Thin Client Needs LDVS removed

2011-12-21 Thread Joseph Salisbury
Thank you for providing a patch, and making Ubuntu better. Can you provide some information on the status of the patch with regards to getting it merged upstream? Has it been sent upstream, what sort of feedback has it received, is it getting applied to a subsystem maintainer's tree, etc? **

[Bug 907055] Re: Clientron E830 Thin Client Needs LDVS removed

2011-12-21 Thread jsass
@jsalisbury Is there any further information I could provide you? This is my first kernel patch, and am unsure if you are asking me about merging upstream. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 907055] Re: Clientron E830 Thin Client Needs LDVS removed

2011-12-21 Thread Joseph Salisbury
I was asking if you submitted the patch upstream as of yet. This is usually done by contacting the maintainer of a subsystem or sending email to LKML. The reason is that the kernel team is reluctant (not opposed) to apply any patch to a stable kernel that is not from upstream. Applying patches

[Bug 907055] Re: Clientron E830 Thin Client Needs LDVS removed

2011-12-20 Thread jsass
** Patch added: patch for drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/907055/+attachment/2641775/+files/patchfile -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/907055 Title:

[Bug 907055] Re: Clientron E830 Thin Client Needs LDVS removed

2011-12-20 Thread jsass
apport information ** Tags added: apport-collected ** Description changed: This thin client is based on an Atom chipset associated with a few netbooks. By default, the LVDS output is left running, and must be disabled in some fashion. Without disabling LVDS, the client appears to be