I suppose revision 113 that Zygmunt talked about is now
https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~zyga/command-not-found/trunk/revision/113
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/92862
Title:
Shouldn't
Zygmunt, I hope you are still following this ticket. You marked the
upstream ticket as fix released. Did your code ever make it into an
official upstream release? What version?
** Changed in: command-not-found (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Triaged
--
You received this bug notification
** Changed in: command-not-found
Assignee: sanjay (sanjay-enrogel) = (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/92862
Title:
Shouldn't be apt-get-centric
To manage
** Changed in: command-not-found
Assignee: (unassigned) = sanjay (sanjay-enrogel)
** Changed in: command-not-found (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged = Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
As far as I know, this is still not fixed.
** Changed in: command-not-found (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress = Triaged
** Changed in: command-not-found
Status: Fix Released = Confirmed
--
Shouldn't be apt-get-centric
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/92862
You received this bug
Please don't change the status on upstream project.
This was fixed in: lp:command-not-found/lucid revno 113
(http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~zkrynicki/command-not-
found/lucid/revision/113) it just never got to ubuntu.
** Changed in: command-not-found
Status: Confirmed = Fix Released
**
I have heard this aptitude is prefered before but have never seen
any official documentation to support it.
From the dpkg man page:
dpkg is a tool to install, build, remove and manage Debian packages.
The primary and more user-friendly front-end for dpkg is aptitude(1).
I agree with Evan that
Zygmunt, I had a look at the bzr branch and I don't see anything. Can
you give me a pointer where this is released?
--
Shouldn't be apt-get-centric
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/92862
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Changed in: command-not-found
Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released
--
Shouldn't be apt-get-centric
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/92862
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
** Changed in: command-not-found
Importance: Undecided = Wishlist
--
Shouldn't be apt-get-centric
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/92862
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
I will work on a lucid branch this evening. I'll post updates here
--
Shouldn't be apt-get-centric
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/92862
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Branch is ready, I just need to publish this
** Changed in: command-not-found (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged = In Progress
** Changed in: command-not-found (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Zygmunt Krynicki (zkrynicki)
--
Shouldn't be apt-get-centric
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/92862
Sorry, it's hard to aim on this lousy touchpad, the fix is not released
jet, just commited
** Changed in: command-not-found (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress = Fix Committed
** Also affects: command-not-found
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: command-not-found
** Changed in: command-not-found
Milestone: None = 0.2.41
--
Shouldn't be apt-get-centric
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/92862
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Can you provide something for testing?
--
Shouldn't be apt-get-centric
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/92862
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Zygmunt, thank you for your continued support. Any chance we may see
this in Lucid?
--
Shouldn't be apt-get-centric
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/92862
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
I think that depends on Lucid freeze time. A simple fix shoud do it.
--
Shouldn't be apt-get-centric
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/92862
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Two things:
1. It would be cool if this could be globally configured, as well as
per-user configured. Religious battles aside, I have a personal
preference for aptitude, and would like to encourage users on systems I
administer to use it.
2. It would also be cool if I could replace apt-get
** Changed in: command-not-found (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Triaged
--
Shouldn't be apt-get-centric
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/92862
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
I don't see any such code anywhere, not even in the Jaunty source.
$ rgrep install-package-cmd command-not-found-0.2.31ubuntu2/
$
--
Shouldn't be apt-get-centric
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/92862
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
Zygmunt seems to be busy and not actively working on this. Reassigning
back to nobody.
** Changed in: command-not-found (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Zygmunt Krynicki (zkrynicki) = (unassigned)
--
Shouldn't be apt-get-centric
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/92862
You received this bug notification
I'm sorry I don't really have time to get this fixed ATM (basically I
don't do source uploads which means I cannot control how the code is
fixed etc).
To put the story to an end:
1) Yes there *was* some support for this in my code (I wrote it back 3 ubuntu
cycles from now)
2) I think the code
Zygmunt, thank you for taking the time to reply. Your previous work is
appreciated.
Excuse me if I'm being naive, but I took a brief look at the sources
today (even hardwired aptitude into c-n-f instead of apt-get) and
wouldn't it be just replacing the hardcoded strings that are present now
with
No you're right - it's very easy to fix this. I added a configuration
file (per user) that allows you to choose aptitude. Simple variable was
not enough because I think with apt you need two programs and with
aptitude you only needed one and I had some localization issues. I
cannot remember
Zygmunt, are you sure there is such code? Still not working in
Intrepid.
--
Shouldn't be apt-get-centric
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/92862
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Reopening, since even on hardy, command-not-found still insists on apt-
get (I think the argument that aptitude should be default if nothing
else has been specified has some merit)
$ cat ~/.command-not-found/install-package-cmd
aptitude install
yet, nothing
** Changed in: command-not-found
Hmm apparently for some reason aptitude vs apt-get selection code is
missing in Hardy
--
Shouldn't be apt-get-centric
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/92862
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
I strongly disagree about not telling the user exactly how to install a
package. This is mostly intended for new users that cannot search
package directory yet and are stuck looking for something they want to
use.
Debian can replace the default value and recommend aptitude instead.
--
Shouldn't
Debian recommends aptitude over apt-get [1].
I think that command-not-found should just say install package
instead of saying the exact command to install the package.
[1] http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/reference/ch-package.en.html#s
-apt-commands
--
Shouldn't be apt-get-centric
I had thought that (despite aptitude being horribly slow) the
recommended command line package tool was aptitude and not apt-get.
If this is the case it seems strange that the command line magic in
ubuntu points users to apt-get install instead of aptitude install.
--
Shouldn't be
The next version that is not included in feisty has a perference option
that allows you select either one.
--
Shouldn't be apt-get-centric
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/92862
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
I have heard this aptitude is prefered before but have never seen any
official documentation to support it. I appreciate that some people
prefer it, but that's personal preference not Ubuntu policy as far as I
can see.
The official docs don't even mention aptitude:-
apt-get's autoremove sucks, sorry. It wants to autoremove like half my
system right now, and there's no way to tell it, No, I _WANT_ to keep
these packages! Aptitude, however, is being very nice about it and not
mentioning any packages right now. In fact, aptitude can actually
autoremove old
Matt, maybe you should file a bug against apt-get rather than comment
here where it wont necessarily get seen.
--
Shouldn't be apt-get-centric
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/92862
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
Implemented an extension that searches for ~/.command-not-found/install-
package-cmd. If you put something like 'aptitude install' it will pick
it up and display it instead of 'apt-get install'
** Changed in: command-not-found (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Zygmunt Krynicki
Status:
apt-get also has autoremove:-
---
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo apt-get install links2
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
The following extra packages will be installed:
libdirectfb-0.9-25
On Tue, 2007-03-20 at 11:30 +, Alan Pope wrote:
apt-get also has autoremove:-
That's news to me, but my argument still stands, people might prefer
other package managers.
--
Bruce Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Shouldn't be apt-get-centric
https://launchpad.net/bugs/92862
--
ubuntu-bugs
Thanks for your bugreport.
Out of interesst, what do you use? aptitude? dselect?
Cheer,s
Michael
** Changed in: command-not-found (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Wishlist
Status: Unconfirmed = Needs Info
--
Shouldn't be apt-get-centric
https://launchpad.net/bugs/92862
--
aptitude, thanks to it's lovely auto-removal handling.
--
Shouldn't be apt-get-centric
https://launchpad.net/bugs/92862
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
39 matches
Mail list logo
