Daniel Chen, please justify marking this bug report as invalid. I
believe that, at the very least, texlive-latex-recommended should depend
on texlive-latex-base, to prevent a user from ever seeing this error.
** Changed in: texlive-base (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid = New
--
[Feisty] mathpazo
On Di, 30 Sep 2008, edschofield wrote:
Daniel Chen, please justify marking this bug report as invalid. I
believe that, at the very least, texlive-latex-recommended should depend
on texlive-latex-base, to prevent a user from ever seeing this error.
I don't know what you are talking about:
$
That's also true on a Ubuntu system:
$ apt-cache show texlive-latex-recommended | grep Depends
Depends: texlive-common (= 2007), texlive-latex-base (= 2007-11)
(that's on intrepid but also for feisty, gusty and hardy packages.ubuntu.com
lists a dependency on texlive-latex-base)
And to be sure:
Great, then this bug was apparently fixed in the Feisty development
cycle. Marking as fix released.
** Changed in: texlive-base (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Fix Released
--
[Feisty] mathpazo style file is missing from texlive-latex-recommended
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/93809
You received
** Changed in: texlive-base (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
--
[Feisty] mathpazo style file is missing from texlive-latex-recommended
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/93809
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
Ah, it appears that mathpazo.sty is in texlive-latex-base.
Does it really make sense to split up the style files and font files
into different packages? Aren't the style files and font files entirely
useless without each other?
--
[Feisty] mathpazo style file is missing from
