[Bug 940230] Re: openssl on 64bit is much slower than before

2022-05-07 Thread Oibaf
Can you still reproduce this issue on a newer and supported Ubuntu release? ** Changed in: openssl (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/940230

[Bug 940230] Re: openssl on 64bit is much slower than before

2013-01-22 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users. ** Changed in: openssl (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/940230 Title:

[Bug 940230] Re: openssl on 64bit is much slower than before

2012-08-19 Thread cc
Just checking in 3 months later. Any chance on getting some movement on this for the next Precise update? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/940230 Title: openssl on 64bit is much

[Bug 940230] Re: openssl on 64bit is much slower than before

2012-08-19 Thread cc
** Also affects: precise-backports Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/940230 Title: openssl on 64bit is much slower than before To manage

[Bug 940230] Re: openssl on 64bit is much slower than before

2012-08-19 Thread cc
** No longer affects: precise-backports -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/940230 Title: openssl on 64bit is much slower than before To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 940230] Re: openssl on 64bit is much slower than before

2012-06-27 Thread cc
Any decision on this? The stopgap is not that hard. Disable ASM for 64bit and retest to see the performance numbers. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/940230 Title: openssl on 64bit is

[Bug 940230] Re: openssl on 64bit is much slower than before

2012-03-28 Thread cc
Can you post some numbers to compare? Post the output of openssl speed aes for different scenarios at a minimum and specify your processor type. There should be a comparison of both 32bit to 64bit on precise (which is what I think you are comparing) AND a comparison of ssl performance on

[Bug 940230] Re: openssl on 64bit is much slower than before

2012-03-28 Thread cc
** Tags added: performance ** Description changed: Posting output of openssl speed on precise alpha and 10.04. Some quick googling seems to indicate issues with 64bit asm vs. the C version (might be a good idea to disable 64bit asm). This is on a processor - without AES-NI (which is still

[Bug 940230] Re: openssl on 64bit is much slower than before

2012-03-27 Thread Scott Moser
Just a reference, I've seen something similar at bug 963420, but my initial tests have not shown significant difference in i386 compared to amd64. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/940230

[Bug 940230] Re: openssl on 64bit is much slower than before

2012-03-17 Thread JH
Here's a post that talks about the old assembly for 64bit x86. http://zombe.es/post/405783/openssl-outmoded-asm Performance is up to 50% worse for AES ciphers so I would think this is a must fix. Patch available for RC4 on x86_64.

[Bug 940230] Re: openssl on 64bit is much slower than before

2012-02-24 Thread Jauder Ho
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/940230 Title: openssl on 64bit is much slower than before To manage notifications about this bug go to: