[Bug 954029] Re: gettext fails to install; package relationships should be with "gettext:any", "gettext-base:any", or are not required/useful at all

2021-10-13 Thread Steve Langasek
The Precise Pangolin has reached end of life, so this bug will not be fixed for that release ** Changed in: wine1.4 (Ubuntu Precise) Status: Triaged => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 954029] Re: gettext fails to install; package relationships should be with gettext:any, gettext-base:any, or are not required/useful at all

2014-12-03 Thread Rolf Leggewie
quantal has seen the end of its life and is no longer receiving any updates. Marking the quantal task for this ticket as Won't Fix. ** Changed in: wine1.4 (Ubuntu Quantal) Status: Triaged = Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 954029] Re: gettext fails to install; package relationships should be with gettext:any, gettext-base:any, or are not required/useful at all

2013-04-22 Thread Daniel Hartwig
Scott, any chance of an SRU? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954029 Title: gettext fails to install; package relationships should be with gettext:any, gettext-base:any, or are not

[Bug 954029] Re: gettext fails to install; package relationships should be with gettext:any, gettext-base:any, or are not required/useful at all

2012-11-19 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package wine1.4 - 1.4.1-0ubuntu2 --- wine1.4 (1.4.1-0ubuntu2) raring; urgency=low * Drop wine1.4-common package and use :any depends for multiarch * Remove recommends on gettext (LP: #954029) * Add CFLAGS=-DIP_UNICAST_IF=50 to configure (LP: #1065640)

[Bug 954029] Re: gettext fails to install; package relationships should be with gettext:any, gettext-base:any, or are not required/useful at all

2012-11-09 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:~ubuntu-branches/ubuntu/raring/wine1.4/raring- proposed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954029 Title: gettext fails to install; package relationships should be

[Bug 954029] Re: gettext fails to install; package relationships should be with gettext:any, gettext-base:any, or are not required/useful at all

2012-11-05 Thread Scott Ritchie
** Description changed: + [IMPACT] + + This bug can make Wine uninstallable in some cases. + + [TESTCASE] + + Install wine1.4. See comment #13 + + [Regression Potential] + + gettext was never needed for Wine's installed binaries, so none is + forseen + + [Other Info] + + This may be a

Re: [Bug 954029] Re: gettext fails to install; package relationships should be with gettext:any, gettext-base:any, or are not required/useful at all

2012-11-02 Thread draco
Great !!! I have installed PlayOnLinux yesterday on Xubuntu Precise 64 bits, about 400 MB of i386 packages were required. Pretty huge ! Thank you for your analysis and actions with upstream developpers ;-) draco Le 1 nov. 2012 03:23, Scott Ritchie scottritc...@ubuntu.com a écrit : Upstream

[Bug 954029] Re: gettext fails to install; package relationships should be with gettext:any, gettext-base:any, or are not required/useful at all

2012-10-31 Thread Scott Ritchie
Upstream says even libgettext isn't needed at runtime, apparently -- Wine only needs to build the translations into the windows format, and then just uses those. I'm prepping an SRU. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

Re: [Bug 954029] Re: gettext fails to install; package relationships should be with gettext:any, gettext-base:any, or are not required/useful at all

2012-10-31 Thread Daniel Hartwig
On 1 November 2012 10:23, Scott Ritchie scottritc...@ubuntu.com wrote: Upstream says even libgettext isn't needed at runtime, apparently -- Wine only needs to build the translations into the windows format, and then just uses those. I'm prepping an SRU. Makes sense. The Debian packaging does

[Bug 954029] Re: gettext fails to install; package relationships should be with gettext:any, gettext-base:any, or are not required/useful at all

2012-10-30 Thread Scott Ritchie
** Also affects: gettext (Ubuntu Precise) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: wine1.4 (Ubuntu Precise) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: gettext (Ubuntu Quantal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: wine1.4 (Ubuntu

[Bug 954029] Re: gettext fails to install; package relationships should be with gettext:any, gettext-base:any, or are not required/useful at all

2012-10-30 Thread Scott Ritchie
Depending on foo:any was not allowed in the Precise cycle, unfortunately. The update for Wine will have to make use of the wine1.4-common package as a workaround. I do believe Wine needs more than just the library. It does some odd things with po files and windows format translations. I am

[Bug 954029] Re: gettext fails to install; package relationships should be with gettext:any, gettext-base:any, or are not required/useful at all

2012-10-30 Thread Daniel Hartwig
I am double-checking with upstream now though. Appreciated. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954029 Title: gettext fails to install; package relationships should be with

[Bug 954029] Re: gettext fails to install; package relationships should be with gettext:any, gettext-base:any, or are not required/useful at all

2012-10-27 Thread Daniel Hartwig
Recently brought up on debian-devel@ [1]. Wine maintainers, your “Recommends: gettext” is most likely incorrect. Please attend to this issue. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2012/10/msg00410.html -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 954029] Re: gettext fails to install; package relationships should be with gettext:any, gettext-base:any, or are not required/useful at all

2012-10-08 Thread Daniel Hartwig
Structure of gettext packaging in Debian is currently being discussed http://bugs.debian.org/683751, and it is likely this will no longer be an issue for playonlinux. The wine1.4 recommends still needs to be examined. ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #683751

[Bug 954029] Re: gettext fails to install; package relationships should be with gettext:any, gettext-base:any, or are not required/useful at all

2012-10-08 Thread Daniel Hartwig
** No longer affects: playonlinux (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954029 Title: gettext fails to install; package relationships should be with gettext:any,