[Bug 9870] Re: Better spam filtering for evolution

2007-10-19 Thread Murali
I am using Gutsy, and have bogofilter installed, but not spamassassin. The filter as such works, but doesn't seem to be applied to the inbox, or new mail at all. I have to select All Messages, and then apply Check for Junk for the filtering to take place. If Fiesty it worked as it showed, but not

[Bug 9870] Re: Better spam filtering for evolution

2007-10-03 Thread Kai Schroeder
Evolution still selects spamassasin as the default junk filter in gutsy, although it should select bogofilter which is installed. -- Better spam filtering for evolution https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/9870 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a

[Bug 9870] Re: Better spam filtering for evolution

2007-09-25 Thread Evgeny \nekr0z\ Kuznetsov
Gutsy here, bogofilter installed, and it seems to work, but the spam messages don't make it to the spam folder, just stay in inbox. -- Better spam filtering for evolution https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/9870 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a

[Bug 9870] Re: Better spam filtering for evolution

2007-09-22 Thread Sebastien Bacher
right, and bogofilter in install by default on gutsy, closing ** Changed in: evolution (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- Better spam filtering for evolution https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/9870 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 9870] Re: Better spam filtering for evolution

2007-09-21 Thread Anthony S
I believe the fix for this has been released with Gnome 2.20: http://www.gnome.org/start/2.20/notes/en/index.html#rnusers-email-and- calendar Allows you to choose the Spam plugin (SpamAssassin or BogoFilter) via its preferences. And SpamAssassin will now actually learn when you mark emails as

[Bug 9870] Re: Better spam filtering for evolution

2007-08-09 Thread Jørgen Syvertsen
I'm experiencing some strange warnings when I run Evolution from the command line. The warnings are: (evolution-2.10:27539): evolution-mail-WARNING **: ignored this junk plugin: not enabled or we have already loaded one (evolution-2.10:27539): e-utils-WARNING **: Plugin 'Spamassassin junk

[Bug 9870] Re: Better spam filtering for evolution

2007-08-01 Thread kseise
Spam filtering under Gutsy Tribe 3 fails using the spamassassin plugin. It worked fine under 7.04. -- Better spam filtering for evolution https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/9870 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. --

[Bug 9870] Re: Better spam filtering for evolution

2007-05-25 Thread Mark Edgington
For the record, I am running Ubuntu 7.04 on an AMD64 machine, and use Evolution to access mail via IMAP. Spam filtering with Bogofilter only works when a group of messages is selected, and the Message-Check for Junk menu item is chosen. So, it does not check automatically upon receiving new

[Bug 9870] Re: Better spam filtering for evolution

2007-05-18 Thread fheible
On my latest Ubuntu install (6.10), spamassassin was set up by default, and worked. I just had to create the mail filter. Previously (and particularly on other distros), it was a pain, of course! -- Better spam filtering for evolution https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/9870 You received this bug

[Bug 9870] Re: Better spam filtering for evolution

2007-03-21 Thread Ben Edwards
OK - not sure if this help much but spamassasin used to work great. I think it got broke when I went to Edgy. -- Better spam filtering for evolution https://launchpad.net/bugs/9870 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 9870] Re: Better spam filtering for evolution

2007-02-11 Thread Rasmus Toftdahl Olesen
Hi Ubuntu guys I have created an Evolution plugin that uses SpamBayes for filtering, it has not been tested that much yet, so i'm hoping from the adventorous of you to help test it. It is available as Debian packages from here (in the etch distribution):

[Bug 9870] Re: Better spam filtering for evolution

2007-02-08 Thread Daniel Holbach
** Changed in: evolution (Ubuntu) Assignee: Jeff Waugh = (unassigned) Target: ubuntu-5.04 = None ** Tags added: ubuntulove -- Better spam filtering for evolution https://launchpad.net/bugs/9870 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 9870] Re: Better spam filtering for evolution

2006-12-23 Thread Todd Mansfield
As a user, I'm more than happy to train my own spam filter. For me, this is perfectly understandable and reasonable. Problem is, I've been trying to train Evolution in Dapper for months now and it still lets a preposterously large amount of spam through. What a patsy of a spam tool! And yes, I

[Bug 9870] Re: Better spam filtering for evolution

2006-10-17 Thread Ian Ohr
** Tags added: evolution -- Better spam filtering for evolution https://launchpad.net/bugs/9870 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 9870] Re: Better spam filtering for evolution

2006-10-17 Thread Sebastien Bacher
what is the interest to add an evolution tag to an evolution bug? ** Tags removed: evolution -- Better spam filtering for evolution https://launchpad.net/bugs/9870 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 9870] Re: Better spam filtering for evolution

2006-09-06 Thread Chris Lord
bogofilter ham can be trained with POP/local mail, or with IMAP mail if you choose to keep local computer synced by cd-ing into the directory ($HOME/.evolution/mail/local/Inbox or $HOME/.evolution/mail/imap/account/folders/INBOX) and using either 'bogofilter -n

[Bug 9870] Re: Better spam filtering for evolution

2006-08-09 Thread Craig Sampson
All this training, spam, ham, blah blah - I've got to ask, why we don't just find a tool which uses RBL's and be done with the whole thing? In windows I use something called spampal which has a bunch of functionality but I use it basically as a turnkey method of accessing RBL's - virtually no

[Bug 9870] Re: Better spam filtering for evolution

2006-08-09 Thread Jan Claeys
why we don't just find a tool which uses RBL's and be done with the whole thing? Because self-learning filters generally perform a lot better after being trained, when considering both false negatives (no problem if there aren't many) and false positives (even 1 might get you in trouble). As

[Bug 9870] Re: Better spam filtering for evolution

2006-08-05 Thread Tom Arnold
I did not succeed in integrating spam-bayes into evolution in a easy manor, coz i am using IMAP and things became very tricky. I think bogofilter is the way to, because it is faster and it already has a evolution plugin. But from what i have read it is not always working right. And there has to

[Bug 9870] Re: Better spam filtering for evolution

2006-08-01 Thread Tom Arnold
As the initial poster it is nice to see that this is still concerning people. I will try to take matters in my own hand and describe the solution with the python written spambayes. It is really neat and the classification in spam, ham and UNSURE is really great, coz you only have to care for the

[Bug 9870] Re: Better spam filtering for evolution

2006-07-29 Thread Anthony Edwards
In respect of SpamAssassin, the SpamAssassin version currently packaged with Dapper (and Edgy!) is 3.1.0 - now ten months (and four releases!) out of date. This makes it (sadly) to all intents and purposes useless as a spam filtering solution for real world deployment. The spam/spam filtering

[Bug 9870] Re: Better spam filtering for evolution

2006-07-15 Thread Jan Claeys
It's not true that you can't bootstrap bogofilter with ham from within evolution, it's just not easily discoverable. What you have to do is mark at least one ham message as spam, then go to your spam folder and mark it as ham. From then on it will work. -- Better spam filtering for evolution

[Bug 9870] Re: Better spam filtering for evolution

2006-07-15 Thread PeterShinners
I would guess it should be easy to take a small cross section of users that have been bogofiltering for awhile and collect all their ham info. Then this could be shipped with the bogofilter as a reasonable starting point. Then again, I haven't looked into this sort of thing at all. -- Better