Steven Shiau [1] has placed the source online [2]. He notes:
1. Some commands are done when we create the rpm from tarball, so we
will use autotools in the tarball in the future. For the time being,
some of the file path are done in rpm sepc file, therefore in the future
the autotools is a must
On 8/14/07, Bryan McLellan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Additionally, many of the scripts were not written by the authors. There
are scripts in these packages using a number of different licenses,
including GPL, MPL, Perl Artistic, BSD (with advertising clause), and
many pieces of code without
I can't find source tarballs for this software. The maintainers provide
only source rpms and binary rpms on the english sourceforge download
site[1]. Binary debs are also available from a ftp site associated with
the project [2] which claim to be ubuntu 7.04 compatible but are
actually alien'd
I am presenting on this topic at Ubuntu LIve. Can I mention any updates
to this bug at the conference?
http://www.ubuntulive.com/cs/ubuntu/view/e_sess/12510
http://www.ubuntulive.com/cs/ubuntu/view/e_spkr/3455
--
[need-packaging] drbl / clonezilla
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98886
You
Thanks for your bug report.
** Changed in: Ubuntu
Importance: Undecided = Wishlist
Assignee: (unassigned) = MOTU
Status: Unconfirmed = Confirmed
** Tags added: needs-packaging
--
[need-packaging] drbl / clonezilla
https://launchpad.net/bugs/98886
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
