Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] [Bug 420513] Re: [needs packaging]lubuntu desktop meta

2009-09-05 Thread hagisbasheruk
Mario wrote I suggest to meet on IRC freenode #lubuntu on Sep. 6, 15.00 GMT http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=5month=9year=2009hour=15min=0sec=0p1=0 Mario you wrote to meet on IRC freenode #lubuntu on Sep. 6, 15.00 GMT But the link you gave is for today the 5th of Sept @

Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] [Bug 420513] Re: [needs packaging]lubuntu desktop meta

2009-09-05 Thread Mario Behling
Mario you wrote to meet on IRC freenode #lubuntu on Sep. 6, 15.00 GMT But the link you gave is for today the 5th of Sept @ 15.00 UTC. Great Britain/United Kingdom is one hour ahead of UTC during summer. Which gives us a meeting time of 14.00 local time here in the UK Could you please clarify

Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] [Bug 420513] Re: [needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta

2009-09-05 Thread Martin-Éric Racine
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 7:23 AM, David Sugar wrote: Second, I suggest given that UDS for Karmic +1 is likely going to be in two months, that we draft a new spec for that UDS for/from and most especially WITH the Lubuntu team and community.  Indeed, it is the approach of UDS is one reason I

Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] [Bug 420513] Re: [needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta

2009-09-05 Thread Martin-Éric Racine
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 2:49 AM, hagisbasheruk wrote: I suggest that you try to minimize any use of gnome libs as possible, use slim instead of gdm, use Wicd for network as lxnw is too limited right now, aumix-gtk for mixer and a program to add menu entries. 1) slim has not been packaged.

Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] [Bug 420513] Re: [needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta

2009-09-05 Thread Scott Kitterman
Just as a general suggestion, the needs packaging bug probably isn't the best venue for these meta Lubuntu discussions. -- [needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420513 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] [Bug 420513] Re: [needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta

2009-09-04 Thread Dallas Wiebelhaus
Scott , We are all grown folks and we also understand that David Sugar is more or less the boss here , There will be no foul play. Now let's be positive and congratulate everyone on a job well done and wish everyone a Fantastic week end of whatever tickles your fancy! Cheers folks! It's POETS.

Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] [Bug 420513] Re: [needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta

2009-09-04 Thread Rebentisch
2009/9/4 David Sugar david.su...@canonical.com There is a launchpad team for Lubuntu, and there is a process for community input through the wiki, but not a formal governance process as yet, What precisely is required, and how could the LXDE Foundation provide assistance? -- A -- [needs

Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] [Bug 420513] Re: [needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta

2009-09-04 Thread Mario Behling
Thank you for the input about the ISO that was tested. As stated the ISO is not a final release. Some of the changes you suggested have already been incorporated. Others will be as we go on. We will soon be uploading a new test iso. All the best, Mario On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 1:49 AM,

Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] [Bug 420513] Re: [needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta

2009-09-04 Thread Mario Behling
Hi, On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 11:13 PM, David Sugardavid.su...@canonical.com wrote: Lol!  While I appreciate the vote of confidence, the goal was NEVER to have a dictatorship, benevolent or otherwise! Thanks for making this clear. The goal for lubuntu was from the start to build a strong and

Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] [Bug 420513] Re: [needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta

2009-09-01 Thread actionparsnip
I suggest putting the LXDE icon in the centre of the circle much like Xubuntu puts the XFCE mouse in te logo. 2009/9/1 Martin-Éric Racine q-f...@iki.fi The blue theme doesn't differentiate enough from KDE. We need to use other colors. How about these? (attachment) ** Attachment added:

Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] [Bug 420513] Re: [needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta

2009-08-31 Thread Martin-Éric Racine
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 11:09 PM, Julien Lavergnejulien.laver...@gmail.com wrote: @Martin-Éric An exception is only necessary for the first inclusion of the package. Adjusting dependencies (default applications) can be made without exceptions (unless most of applications changed). Ah,

Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] [Bug 420513] Re: [needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta

2009-08-31 Thread Mario Behling
Dear all, lynxis has put together a lubuntu-iso to test: http://lynxis.crew.c-base.org All the best, Mario 2009/8/31 Martin-Éric Racine q-f...@iki.fi: On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 11:09 PM, Julien Lavergnejulien.laver...@gmail.com wrote: @Martin-Éric An exception is only necessary for the

Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] [Bug 420513] Re: [needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta

2009-08-31 Thread Mario Behling
Dear all, enclosed a few desktop backgrounds and images I collected from the lubuntu designer forum at the lxde website. Please include. Best, Mario ** Attachment added: lubuntu-design.zip http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31051972/lubuntu-design.zip -- [needs packaging] lubuntu desktop

Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] [Bug 420513] Re: [needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta

2009-08-31 Thread Glen Bizeau
I like them, especially logo 2 Glen On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 8:41 AM, Mario Behlingm...@mariobehling.de wrote: Dear all, enclosed a few desktop backgrounds and images I collected from the lubuntu designer forum at the lxde website. Please include. Best, Mario

Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] [Bug 420513] Re: [needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta

2009-08-31 Thread Martin-Éric Racine
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 2:41 PM, Mario Behlingm...@mariobehling.de wrote: Dear all, enclosed a few desktop backgrounds and images I collected from the lubuntu designer forum at the lxde website. Please include. I personally like the all-blue background with the bubbly logo best. I'd however

Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] [Bug 420513] Re: [needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta

2009-08-31 Thread Mario Behling
Hi, I like those designs, but I am not decided which way I like most. I think we can also gather more design suggestions and it is always easier to see, than to hear how something looks like. Fedora created an adapted them for the LXDE spin. Openbox is just one part, we also need to create athe

Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] [Bug 420513] Re: [needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta

2009-08-30 Thread Dallas Wiebelhaus
I agree with Martin-Éric Racine and thanks for the patch as well , Cheers. 2009/8/30 Martin-Éric Racine q-f...@iki.fi Looking at what the resulting lubuntu-desktop package tries to pull: 1) sysinfo -- As this pulls the whole MONO framework along, I contend that the inclusion of this is

Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] [Bug 420513] Re: [needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta

2009-08-30 Thread David Sugar
I had wanted to get feedback sooner and hence see this done earlier. Most if not all of these changes noted are certainly valid. Where we touch upon what the default apps should be, my only concern is that we do not have a lot of revs. If we are going to split the seed to produce variants of

Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] [Bug 420513] Re: [needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta

2009-08-29 Thread Mario Behling
Hi, lubuntu and lubuntu karmic seeds are here: https://code.launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop Best, Mario 2009/8/29 Martin-Éric Racine q-f...@iki.fi: Under which package name can we see those packages? -- [needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420513 You