I can confirm this output (notably failing to initialize dbus, and the
NameErrors
--phix
On 9/20/07, ThinkpadUBUNTU [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am afraid none of the above allowed the upgrade to run on my system -
here is the output
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo touch -t 19700101
On Mon, September 10, 2007 4:07 am, Michael Vogt wrote:
I put packages online at:
deb http://people.ubuntu.com/~mvo/update-manager /
Please give them a go.
Thanks,
Thank *you*. Seems to work just great, except that running
sudo update-manager -d, I needed to hit Check before the
new
Should we be checking for corrupt meta release info as well as 0
length files here?
Is it that bad to download the meta release file every time when -d is
passed?
On 9/7/07, schnollk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to report what happend here[1]:
1. procedure as suggested a
On Thu, September 6, 2007 4:33 pm, Anders wrote:
I tried
$ sudo touch -t 19700101 /var/lib/update-manager/meta-release
$ update-manager -d
to no avail.
Try using sudo for both commands. Or try:
$ rm ~/.update-manager-core/meta-release
$ update-manager -d
--
update-manager cannot find
On Tue, August 28, 2007 3:17 am, Martin Pool wrote:
The recipe give by Daniel Moyne of just touching the file to the epoch
does not work for me, neither does the one from ysth.
Touching the file may not work if you don't sudo update-manager.
I'd like to know what you tried.
mvo's patch does
On Mon, 2007-08-27 at 18:22 +, brettalton wrote:
Has the patch been uploaded to the repositories? I'm not sure how to
merg a .diff file.
sudo
patch /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/UpdateManager/Core/MetaRelease.py
u-m.diff should do it (I hope).
--
Bruce Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
