Public bug reported:
== Comment: #0 - Satheesh Rajendran - 2017-03-20 05:00:21
==
---Problem Description---
virsh maxvcpus throws "error: invalid argument: unable to find any emulator to
serve 'ppc64le' architecture"
Contact Information = sathe...@in.ibm.com
---uname
** Changed in: unity8 (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Lukáš Tinkl (lukas-kde)
** Changed in: unity8 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Changed in: unity8 (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Lukáš Tinkl (lukas-kde)
** Changed in: unity8 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Zesty)
Importance: Undecided
Status: Incomplete
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Aa-series)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Aa-series)
Status: New => Fix Released
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Zesty)
Dimitri was not available, but I found another sponsor.
Thanks APW!
@Talat if you could finally post if the version that is released is good
as well that would be nice.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1669444 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1669444
** Branch linked: lp:~ci-train-bot/mir/mir-ubuntu-zesty-2609
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Branch linked: lp:~ci-train-bot/mir/mir-ubuntu-zesty-2609
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1666372
Title:
Nested servers (Unity8) periodically stutter (half frame rate) with
Mir
** Branch linked: lp:~pete-woods/indicator-network/use-correct-settings-
item-lp1642989
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1642989
Title:
indicators should use
** Branch linked: lp:~ci-train-bot/mir/mir-ubuntu-zesty-2609
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1664760
Title:
Mir server crashed with SIGSEGV in
** Branch linked: lp:~ci-train-bot/mir/mir-ubuntu-zesty-2609
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1667645
Title:
If the only surface in a session cannot take focus the server crashes
To
Same problem here, Acer Aspire VN7-792G
00:1f.3 Multimedia audio controller: Intel Corporation Sunrise Point-H
HD Audio (rev 31)
dvitali@denvit-ws1:~ $ aplay -L
-1-
null
Discard all samples
It might be that the linux-image-extra package is missing. Can you
check that it's installed?
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
** Tags added: kernel-da-key
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
tests ran: 1, failed: 0;
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/testing/4.10.0-13.15~16.04.2-generic/amaura__4.10.0-13.15~16.04.2__2017-03-20_18-04-00/results-index.html
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
tests ran: 1, failed: 0;
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/testing/4.10.0-13.15~16.04.2-generic/naumann__4.10.0-13.15~16.04.2__2017-03-20_17-59-00/results-index.html
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Summary changed:
- linux-gke: -proposed tracker
+ linux-gke: 4.4.0-1007.7 -proposed tracker
** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/prepare-package
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/prepare-package
Assignee: Canonical Kernel Team (canonical-kernel-team) =>
** Description changed:
GNOME Shell 3.24 introduces a "Launch using Dedicated Graphics Card"
feature (https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=773117). However it
- missing in Ubuntu due lack of switcheroo-control in repositories.
+ needs the switcheroo-control package to work.
This is
Is this 100% reproducible for you?
Can you comment more about your setup?
* What system?
* What BIOS?
* What devices do you have plugged in? Monitors, docks, etc?
** Information type changed from Private to Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Follow-up to #34, on a system where unattended-upgrades happens to be
running when shutdown is called, the shutdown does not wait, therefore
any running dpkg is killed and the package left in an inconsistent
state.
- Xenial with single partition, InstallOnShutdown not defined.
This may be a
** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/prepare-package-meta
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/prepare-package-meta
Assignee: Canonical Kernel Team (canonical-kernel-team) => Thadeu Lima de
Souza Cascardo (cascardo)
** Description changed:
This bug
tests ran: 1, failed: 0;
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/testing/4.10.0-13.15~16.04.2-generic/secchi__4.10.0-13.15~16.04.2__2017-03-20_18-19-00/results-index.html
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
tests ran: 1, failed: 0;
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/testing/4.4.0-69.90-generic/rumford__4.4.0-69.90__2017-03-20_18-32-00/results-index.html
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1673213
** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/prepare-package-meta
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/prepare-package-meta
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/prepare-package-meta
Assignee: Canonical Kernel Team
** Information type changed from Private to Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1674151
Title:
gnome-shell crashed with signal 5 in _XIOError()
To manage notifications about this
tests ran: 1, failed: 0;
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/testing/4.10.0-14.16-generic/onibi__4.10.0-14.16__2017-03-20_18-28-00/results-index.html
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1673805
** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/prepare-package
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/promote-to-proposed
Status: New => Confirmed
** Description changed:
This bug is for tracking the upload package. This
bug will contain status and testing
tests ran: 1, failed: 0;
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/testing/4.10.0-13.15~16.04.2-generic/amaura__4.10.0-13.15~16.04.2__2017-03-20_18-23-00/results-index.html
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
tests ran: 1, failed: 0;
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/testing/4.10.0-13.15~16.04.2-generic/hainzel__4.10.0-13.15~16.04.2__2017-03-20_18-14-00/results-index.html
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
tests ran: 1, failed: 0;
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/testing/4.10.0-13.15~16.04.2-generic/naumann__4.10.0-13.15~16.04.2__2017-03-20_18-24-00/results-index.html
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
tests ran: 1, failed: 0;
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/testing/4.10.0-13.15~16.04.2-generic/ms10-35-mcdivittB0-kernel__4.10.0-13.15~16.04.2__2017-03-20_18-25-00/results-index.html
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
At least in zesty:
ppc64el/config.common.ppc64el:CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING=y
ppc64el/config.common.ppc64el:CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING_DEFAULT_ENABLED=y
So, is this glibc bug actually a kernel bug I should assign back?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
Xenial as LTS is fine, but that was to be expected as the offending change is
>=2.3.
FYI - I'm working on preparing this fix for Zesty.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1674298
Title:
tests ran: 1, failed: 0;
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/testing/4.10.0-14.16-generic/gonzo__4.10.0-14.16__2017-03-20_18-03-00/results-index.html
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1673805
Yep, assign back, I'll look at it.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1673414
Title:
sched_getcpu on ppc64le produces an illegal instruction
To manage notifications about this bug go
This bug was fixed in the package stress-ng - 0.07.26-1
---
stress-ng (0.07.26-1) unstable; urgency=medium
* Makefile: bump version
* fast-test-all: revert back to maximum of 4 stressors
* stress-zero: disable write to /dev/zero for minix
* shim: fix build error and warnings
tests ran: 1, failed: 0;
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/testing/4.4.0-69.90-generic/modoc__4.4.0-69.90__2017-03-20_18-13-00/results-index.html
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1673213
tests ran: 1, failed: 0;
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/testing/4.10.0-13.15~16.04.2-generic/secchi__4.10.0-13.15~16.04.2__2017-03-20_17-56-00/results-index.html
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
tests ran: 1, failed: 0;
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/testing/4.10.0-13.15~16.04.2-generic/archytas__4.10.0-13.15~16.04.2__2017-03-20_18-03-00/results-index.html
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
tests ran: 1, failed: 0;
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/testing/4.8.0-43.46~16.04.1-generic/alkaid__4.8.0-43.46~16.04.1__2017-03-20_18-15-00/results-index.html
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Also affects: fwupd (Ubuntu Xenial)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: fwupd (Ubuntu Zesty)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: fwupd (Ubuntu Yakkety)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: fwupd (Ubuntu Zesty)
tests ran: 1, failed: 0;
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/testing/4.10.0-14.16-generic/fozzie__4.10.0-14.16__2017-03-20_18-22-00/results-index.html
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1673805
It is probably best to perform a "Reverse" bisect instead of a standard
bisect, since we know this bug is fixed in 4.10 final.
A "Reverse" bisect will identify the commit that fixes the bug instead
of identifying the commit that introduced the bug. We just need to do
the oppisite of a standard
tests ran: 1, failed: 0;
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/testing/4.10.0-13.15~16.04.2-generic/ms10-34-mcdivittB0-kernel__4.10.0-13.15~16.04.2__2017-03-20_18-27-00/results-index.html
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
tests ran: 1, failed: 0;
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/testing/4.10.0-13.15~16.04.2-generic/archytas__4.10.0-13.15~16.04.2__2017-03-20_18-32-00/results-index.html
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Also affects: glibc (Ubuntu Yakkety)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: glibc (Ubuntu Xenial)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1209219 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1209219
Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make
this software better. This particular crash has already been reported
and is a duplicate of bug #1209219, so is being marked as such.
glibc in zesty has Unicode 9.0 support, so closing the glibc task.
** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1665618
Title:
At least my current suspicion looking through the stacktrace is that the
device enumerated successfully, but it was an unsupported board ID and
the error message wasn't set properly.
This commit should resolve it.
https://github.com/hughsie/fwupd/commit/99489a8638c7e1e4ae30ec9ec2b1fc2ca4bee20f
@Anton:
$ cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
cpu : POWER8 (raw), altivec supported
clock : 1000.00MHz
revision: 2.0 (pvr 004d 0200)
timebase: 51200
platform: pSeries
model : IBM pSeries (emulated by qemu)
machine : CHRP
** Changed in: mutter
Status: Fix Released => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1670910
Title:
incorrect BGR subpixel rendering on all Gnome Panel text
To manage
901 - 949 of 949 matches
Mail list logo