This bug was fixed in the package nplan - 0.23~16.10.1
---
nplan (0.23~16.10.1) yakkety; urgency=medium
* Backport netplan 0.23 to 16.10. (LP: #1688632)
nplan (0.23) artful; urgency=medium
* Do not unbind brcmfmac, interface will be gone. (LP: #1696162)
nplan (0.22) artful;
This bug was fixed in the package nplan - 0.23~16.10.1
---
nplan (0.23~16.10.1) yakkety; urgency=medium
* Backport netplan 0.23 to 16.10. (LP: #1688632)
nplan (0.23) artful; urgency=medium
* Do not unbind brcmfmac, interface will be gone. (LP: #1696162)
nplan (0.22) artful;
This bug was fixed in the package nplan - 0.23~17.04.1
---
nplan (0.23~17.04.1) zesty; urgency=medium
* Backport netplan 0.23 to 17.04. (LP: #1688632)
nplan (0.23) artful; urgency=medium
* Do not unbind brcmfmac, interface will be gone. (LP: #1696162)
nplan (0.22) artful;
This bug was fixed in the package nplan - 0.23~16.10.1
---
nplan (0.23~16.10.1) yakkety; urgency=medium
* Backport netplan 0.23 to 16.10. (LP: #1688632)
nplan (0.23) artful; urgency=medium
* Do not unbind brcmfmac, interface will be gone. (LP: #1696162)
nplan (0.22) artful;
This bug was fixed in the package klibc - 2.0.3-0ubuntu1.14.04.3
---
klibc (2.0.3-0ubuntu1.14.04.3) trusty; urgency=medium
* debian/patches/dhcp-one-socket-per-interface.patch: Use separate
sockets for DHCP from multiple interfaces. Thanks to Jay Vosburgh
Please note that you are following up to a bug that is closed in
Launchpad.
> Will Ubuntu 17.10 be shipping with openssl 1.1?
No, since this is an API-incompatible transition, we are still dependent
on upstream projects gaining compatibility for 1.1 before we can switch
the OS to it. We are
Actually, I'm not convinced that update-manager is the front end in use
here. If we look at the JournalErrors.txt file attached to this bug we
can see the following:
dic 02 09:33:40 hostname org.debian.apt[871]: 09:33:40 AptDaemon [INFO]:
Initializing daemon
dic 02 09:33:40 hostname
This bug was fixed in the package cloud-init - 0.7.9-153-g16a7302f-
0ubuntu1~16.10.1
---
cloud-init (0.7.9-153-g16a7302f-0ubuntu1~16.10.1) yakkety-proposed;
urgency=medium
* New upstream snapshot.
- net: fix reading and rendering addresses in cidr format.
[Dimitri John
This bug was fixed in the package cloud-init - 0.7.9-153-g16a7302f-
0ubuntu1~17.04.1
---
cloud-init (0.7.9-153-g16a7302f-0ubuntu1~17.04.1) zesty-proposed; urgency=medium
* New upstream snapshot.
- net: fix reading and rendering addresses in cidr format.
[Dimitri John
The verification of the Stable Release Update for cloud-init has
completed successfully and the package has now been released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you
This bug was fixed in the package cloud-init - 0.7.9-153-g16a7302f-
0ubuntu1~16.04.1
---
cloud-init (0.7.9-153-g16a7302f-0ubuntu1~16.04.1) xenial-proposed;
urgency=medium
* New upstream snapshot.
- net: fix reading and rendering addresses in cidr format.
[Dimitri John
This bug was fixed in the package cloud-init - 0.7.9-153-g16a7302f-
0ubuntu1~17.04.1
---
cloud-init (0.7.9-153-g16a7302f-0ubuntu1~17.04.1) zesty-proposed; urgency=medium
* New upstream snapshot.
- net: fix reading and rendering addresses in cidr format.
[Dimitri John
The verification of the Stable Release Update for cloud-init has
completed successfully and the package has now been released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you
This bug was fixed in the package cloud-init - 0.7.9-153-g16a7302f-
0ubuntu1~16.10.1
---
cloud-init (0.7.9-153-g16a7302f-0ubuntu1~16.10.1) yakkety-proposed;
urgency=medium
* New upstream snapshot.
- net: fix reading and rendering addresses in cidr format.
[Dimitri John
This bug was fixed in the package nplan - 0.23~16.10.1
---
nplan (0.23~16.10.1) yakkety; urgency=medium
* Backport netplan 0.23 to 16.10. (LP: #1688632)
nplan (0.23) artful; urgency=medium
* Do not unbind brcmfmac, interface will be gone. (LP: #1696162)
nplan (0.22) artful;
This bug was fixed in the package cloud-init - 0.7.9-153-g16a7302f-
0ubuntu1~16.04.1
---
cloud-init (0.7.9-153-g16a7302f-0ubuntu1~16.04.1) xenial-proposed;
urgency=medium
* New upstream snapshot.
- net: fix reading and rendering addresses in cidr format.
[Dimitri John
This bug was fixed in the package nplan - 0.23~16.10.1
---
nplan (0.23~16.10.1) yakkety; urgency=medium
* Backport netplan 0.23 to 16.10. (LP: #1688632)
nplan (0.23) artful; urgency=medium
* Do not unbind brcmfmac, interface will be gone. (LP: #1696162)
nplan (0.22) artful;
This bug was fixed in the package nplan - 0.23~16.10.1
---
nplan (0.23~16.10.1) yakkety; urgency=medium
* Backport netplan 0.23 to 16.10. (LP: #1688632)
nplan (0.23) artful; urgency=medium
* Do not unbind brcmfmac, interface will be gone. (LP: #1696162)
nplan (0.22) artful;
The verification of the Stable Release Update for nplan has completed
successfully and the package has now been released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
This bug was fixed in the package nplan - 0.23~16.10.1
---
nplan (0.23~16.10.1) yakkety; urgency=medium
* Backport netplan 0.23 to 16.10. (LP: #1688632)
nplan (0.23) artful; urgency=medium
* Do not unbind brcmfmac, interface will be gone. (LP: #1696162)
nplan (0.22) artful;
** Summary changed:
- [Latitude 3340, Realtek ALC3234, Headphone] Static in Headphones While on
Battery Power
+ [Latitude 3340, Realtek ALC3234] MATE - Headphone Static on Battery Power
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
For future reference, this is the list of upstream commits corresponding
to Aaron's patches, in the order they are being applied:
312cea870dfbc363da44074bd6f56ccd283c5420
shared: add nm_auto_close and nm_auto_fclose
ed299cc8605a8291a61b3a514f8dc20390b18c77
device/wwan: use nm_auto_close
Automatically discovered version kilo in description. If this is
incorrect, please update the description to include 'nova version: ...'
** Tags added: openstack-version.kilo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
The verification of the Stable Release Update for nplan has completed
successfully and the package has now been released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
This bug was fixed in the package nplan - 0.23~16.04.1
---
nplan (0.23~16.04.1) xenial; urgency=medium
* Backport netplan 0.23 to 16.04. (LP: #1688632)
nplan (0.23) artful; urgency=medium
* Do not unbind brcmfmac, interface will be gone. (LP: #1696162)
nplan (0.22) artful;
The verification of the Stable Release Update for nplan has completed
successfully and the package has now been released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
This bug was fixed in the package nplan - 0.23~16.04.1
---
nplan (0.23~16.04.1) xenial; urgency=medium
* Backport netplan 0.23 to 16.04. (LP: #1688632)
nplan (0.23) artful; urgency=medium
* Do not unbind brcmfmac, interface will be gone. (LP: #1696162)
nplan (0.22) artful;
The verification of the Stable Release Update for nplan has completed
successfully and the package has now been released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
This bug was fixed in the package nplan - 0.23~16.04.1
---
nplan (0.23~16.04.1) xenial; urgency=medium
* Backport netplan 0.23 to 16.04. (LP: #1688632)
nplan (0.23) artful; urgency=medium
* Do not unbind brcmfmac, interface will be gone. (LP: #1696162)
nplan (0.22) artful;
The verification of the Stable Release Update for nplan has completed
successfully and the package has now been released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
The verification of the Stable Release Update for nplan has completed
successfully and the package has now been released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
This bug was fixed in the package nplan - 0.23~16.04.1
---
nplan (0.23~16.04.1) xenial; urgency=medium
* Backport netplan 0.23 to 16.04. (LP: #1688632)
nplan (0.23) artful; urgency=medium
* Do not unbind brcmfmac, interface will be gone. (LP: #1696162)
nplan (0.22) artful;
The verification of the Stable Release Update for nplan has completed
successfully and the package has now been released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
The verification of the Stable Release Update for nplan has completed
successfully and the package has now been released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
The verification of the Stable Release Update for nplan has completed
successfully and the package has now been released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
The verification of the Stable Release Update for nplan has completed
successfully and the package has now been released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
This bug was fixed in the package nplan - 0.23~16.04.1
---
nplan (0.23~16.04.1) xenial; urgency=medium
* Backport netplan 0.23 to 16.04. (LP: #1688632)
nplan (0.23) artful; urgency=medium
* Do not unbind brcmfmac, interface will be gone. (LP: #1696162)
nplan (0.22) artful;
This bug was fixed in the package nplan - 0.23~16.04.1
---
nplan (0.23~16.04.1) xenial; urgency=medium
* Backport netplan 0.23 to 16.04. (LP: #1688632)
nplan (0.23) artful; urgency=medium
* Do not unbind brcmfmac, interface will be gone. (LP: #1696162)
nplan (0.22) artful;
Opened bug #1700772 for reverting to version 0.47.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1519668
Title:
[Feature]Add Intel Omni-Path Architecture (OPA) Firmware
To manage notifications
Public bug reported:
After a new install of Ubuntu 16.04.2 LTS, i have some bugs.
I'm new in the Ubuntu world, but i would like to know more.
I have install the OS with a pen and after i installed some apps from the
"Ubuntu software" and i run the "software update". After this i restart the
Public bug reported:
Testing the 5.3.3 candidate update the menus are corrupted (a part of
the labels are not showing or only on mouseover)
** Affects: libreoffice (Ubuntu)
Importance: High
Assignee: Olivier Tilloy (osomon)
Status: Confirmed
** Tags: snap
--
You received
** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Olivier Tilloy (osomon)
** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
** Information type changed from Public to Public Security
** Information type changed from Public Security to Private
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1700763
Title:
I'm a noob, and
As part of a recent change in the Stable Release Update verification
policy we would like to inform that for a bug to be considered verified
for a given release a verification-done-$RELEASE tag needs to be added
to the bug where $RELEASE is the name of the series the package that was
tested (e.g.
As part of a recent change in the Stable Release Update verification
policy we would like to inform that for a bug to be considered verified
for a given release a verification-done-$RELEASE tag needs to be added
to the bug where $RELEASE is the name of the series the package that was
tested (e.g.
As part of a recent change in the Stable Release Update verification
policy we would like to inform that for a bug to be considered verified
for a given release a verification-done-$RELEASE tag needs to be added
to the bug where $RELEASE is the name of the series the package that was
tested (e.g.
As part of a recent change in the Stable Release Update verification
policy we would like to inform that for a bug to be considered verified
for a given release a verification-done-$RELEASE tag needs to be added
to the bug where $RELEASE is the name of the series the package that was
tested (e.g.
As part of a recent change in the Stable Release Update verification
policy we would like to inform that for a bug to be considered verified
for a given release a verification-done-$RELEASE tag needs to be added
to the bug where $RELEASE is the name of the series the package that was
tested (e.g.
As part of a recent change in the Stable Release Update verification
policy we would like to inform that for a bug to be considered verified
for a given release a verification-done-$RELEASE tag needs to be added
to the bug where $RELEASE is the name of the series the package that was
tested (e.g.
As part of a recent change in the Stable Release Update verification
policy we would like to inform that for a bug to be considered verified
for a given release a verification-done-$RELEASE tag needs to be added
to the bug where $RELEASE is the name of the series the package that was
tested (e.g.
Khurshi, thanks for your comment.
Shotwell was stuck on an old git snapshot for over a year (LP: #1581180)
because the UOA support was unmaintained and no one had the time or
ability to forward-port that support. That support has now been removed
and we'll finally get a supportable version of
As part of a recent change in the Stable Release Update verification
policy we would like to inform that for a bug to be considered verified
for a given release a verification-done-$RELEASE tag needs to be added
to the bug where $RELEASE is the name of the series the package that was
tested (e.g.
As part of a recent change in the Stable Release Update verification
policy we would like to inform that for a bug to be considered verified
for a given release a verification-done-$RELEASE tag needs to be added
to the bug where $RELEASE is the name of the series the package that was
tested (e.g.
As part of a recent change in the Stable Release Update verification
policy we would like to inform that for a bug to be considered verified
for a given release a verification-done-$RELEASE tag needs to be added
to the bug where $RELEASE is the name of the series the package that was
tested (e.g.
As part of a recent change in the Stable Release Update verification
policy we would like to inform that for a bug to be considered verified
for a given release a verification-done-$RELEASE tag needs to be added
to the bug where $RELEASE is the name of the series the package that was
tested (e.g.
As part of a recent change in the Stable Release Update verification
policy we would like to inform that for a bug to be considered verified
for a given release a verification-done-$RELEASE tag needs to be added
to the bug where $RELEASE is the name of the series the package that was
tested (e.g.
As part of a recent change in the Stable Release Update verification
policy we would like to inform that for a bug to be considered verified
for a given release a verification-done-$RELEASE tag needs to be added
to the bug where $RELEASE is the name of the series the package that was
tested (e.g.
As part of a recent change in the Stable Release Update verification
policy we would like to inform that for a bug to be considered verified
for a given release a verification-done-$RELEASE tag needs to be added
to the bug where $RELEASE is the name of the series the package that was
tested (e.g.
As part of a recent change in the Stable Release Update verification
policy we would like to inform that for a bug to be considered verified
for a given release a verification-done-$RELEASE tag needs to be added
to the bug where $RELEASE is the name of the series the package that was
tested (e.g.
As part of a recent change in the Stable Release Update verification
policy we would like to inform that for a bug to be considered verified
for a given release a verification-done-$RELEASE tag needs to be added
to the bug where $RELEASE is the name of the series the package that was
tested (e.g.
As part of a recent change in the Stable Release Update verification
policy we would like to inform that for a bug to be considered verified
for a given release a verification-done-$RELEASE tag needs to be added
to the bug where $RELEASE is the name of the series the package that was
tested (e.g.
As part of a recent change in the Stable Release Update verification
policy we would like to inform that for a bug to be considered verified
for a given release a verification-done-$RELEASE tag needs to be added
to the bug where $RELEASE is the name of the series the package that was
tested (e.g.
As part of a recent change in the Stable Release Update verification
policy we would like to inform that for a bug to be considered verified
for a given release a verification-done-$RELEASE tag needs to be added
to the bug where $RELEASE is the name of the series the package that was
tested (e.g.
As part of a recent change in the Stable Release Update verification
policy we would like to inform that for a bug to be considered verified
for a given release a verification-done-$RELEASE tag needs to be added
to the bug where $RELEASE is the name of the series the package that was
tested (e.g.
As part of a recent change in the Stable Release Update verification
policy we would like to inform that for a bug to be considered verified
for a given release a verification-done-$RELEASE tag needs to be added
to the bug where $RELEASE is the name of the series the package that was
tested (e.g.
As part of a recent change in the Stable Release Update verification
policy we would like to inform that for a bug to be considered verified
for a given release a verification-done-$RELEASE tag needs to be added
to the bug where $RELEASE is the name of the series the package that was
tested (e.g.
As part of a recent change in the Stable Release Update verification
policy we would like to inform that for a bug to be considered verified
for a given release a verification-done-$RELEASE tag needs to be added
to the bug where $RELEASE is the name of the series the package that was
tested (e.g.
As part of a recent change in the Stable Release Update verification
policy we would like to inform that for a bug to be considered verified
for a given release a verification-done-$RELEASE tag needs to be added
to the bug where $RELEASE is the name of the series the package that was
tested (e.g.
As part of a recent change in the Stable Release Update verification
policy we would like to inform that for a bug to be considered verified
for a given release a verification-done-$RELEASE tag needs to be added
to the bug where $RELEASE is the name of the series the package that was
tested (e.g.
As part of a recent change in the Stable Release Update verification
policy we would like to inform that for a bug to be considered verified
for a given release a verification-done-$RELEASE tag needs to be added
to the bug where $RELEASE is the name of the series the package that was
tested (e.g.
As part of a recent change in the Stable Release Update verification
policy we would like to inform that for a bug to be considered verified
for a given release a verification-done-$RELEASE tag needs to be added
to the bug where $RELEASE is the name of the series the package that was
tested (e.g.
As part of a recent change in the Stable Release Update verification
policy we would like to inform that for a bug to be considered verified
for a given release a verification-done-$RELEASE tag needs to be added
to the bug where $RELEASE is the name of the series the package that was
tested (e.g.
This bug is still affecting me and others that I know.
When using IPv6 with SLAAC you randomly get a new address since you
can't be sure which interface is choosen on boot.
A solution to this problem would be very welcome!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
I can also confirm that the issue exists.
I'm the administrator of 2 DNS nameservers (bind9) running Ubuntu
14.04.5 LTS with upgraded kernel (linux-image-generic-lts-xenial which
depends on linux-image-4.4.0-81-generic at this time).
root@ns2:~# lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
As part of a recent change in the Stable Release Update verification
policy we would like to inform that for a bug to be considered verified
for a given release a verification-done-$RELEASE tag needs to be added
to the bug where $RELEASE is the name of the series the package that was
tested (e.g.
As part of a recent change in the Stable Release Update verification
policy we would like to inform that for a bug to be considered verified
for a given release a verification-done-$RELEASE tag needs to be added
to the bug where $RELEASE is the name of the series the package that was
tested (e.g.
As part of a recent change in the Stable Release Update verification
policy we would like to inform that for a bug to be considered verified
for a given release a verification-done-$RELEASE tag needs to be added
to the bug where $RELEASE is the name of the series the package that was
tested (e.g.
As part of a recent change in the Stable Release Update verification
policy we would like to inform that for a bug to be considered verified
for a given release a verification-done-$RELEASE tag needs to be added
to the bug where $RELEASE is the name of the series the package that was
tested (e.g.
As part of a recent change in the Stable Release Update verification
policy we would like to inform that for a bug to be considered verified
for a given release a verification-done-$RELEASE tag needs to be added
to the bug where $RELEASE is the name of the series the package that was
tested (e.g.
Will it also work for long file names when the bubble covers whole width
and therefore has nowhere to jump? Is it supposed to be fixed in
"1:3.18.4.is.3.14.3-0ubuntu5"?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/security-signoff
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/security-signoff
Assignee: Canonical Security Team (canonical-security) => Steve Beattie
(sbeattie)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
tests ran: 16, failed: 0;
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/testing/4.8.0-58.63-generic/secchi__4.8.0-58.63__2017-06-27_15-59-00/results-index.html
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1700533
tests ran: 1, failed: 0;
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/testing/4.8.0-58.63-generic/amaura__4.8.0-58.63__2017-06-27_13-55-00/results-index.html
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1700533
tests ran: 10, failed: 0;
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/testing/4.8.0-58.63-generic/pepe__4.8.0-58.63__2017-06-27_15-22-00/results-index.html
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1700533
This bug was fixed in the package cloud-init - 0.7.9-153-g16a7302f-
0ubuntu1~16.10.1
---
cloud-init (0.7.9-153-g16a7302f-0ubuntu1~16.10.1) yakkety-proposed;
urgency=medium
* New upstream snapshot.
- net: fix reading and rendering addresses in cidr format.
[Dimitri John
The verification of the Stable Release Update for cloud-init has
completed successfully and the package has now been released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you
This bug was fixed in the package cloud-init - 0.7.9-153-g16a7302f-
0ubuntu1~16.04.1
---
cloud-init (0.7.9-153-g16a7302f-0ubuntu1~16.04.1) xenial-proposed;
urgency=medium
* New upstream snapshot.
- net: fix reading and rendering addresses in cidr format.
[Dimitri John
This bug was fixed in the package cloud-init - 0.7.9-153-g16a7302f-
0ubuntu1~17.04.1
---
cloud-init (0.7.9-153-g16a7302f-0ubuntu1~17.04.1) zesty-proposed; urgency=medium
* New upstream snapshot.
- net: fix reading and rendering addresses in cidr format.
[Dimitri John
The verification of the Stable Release Update for cloud-init has
completed successfully and the package has now been released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you
This bug was fixed in the package cloud-init - 0.7.9-153-g16a7302f-
0ubuntu1~17.04.1
---
cloud-init (0.7.9-153-g16a7302f-0ubuntu1~17.04.1) zesty-proposed; urgency=medium
* New upstream snapshot.
- net: fix reading and rendering addresses in cidr format.
[Dimitri John
I'll be verifying this case by the end of this week so it can be
published, hopefully, next week. Thank you!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1695789
Title:
multipath random crashes on
The verification of the Stable Release Update for cloud-init has
completed successfully and the package has now been released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you
This bug was fixed in the package cloud-init - 0.7.9-153-g16a7302f-
0ubuntu1~16.10.1
---
cloud-init (0.7.9-153-g16a7302f-0ubuntu1~16.10.1) yakkety-proposed;
urgency=medium
* New upstream snapshot.
- net: fix reading and rendering addresses in cidr format.
[Dimitri John
This bug was fixed in the package cloud-init - 0.7.9-153-g16a7302f-
0ubuntu1~17.04.1
---
cloud-init (0.7.9-153-g16a7302f-0ubuntu1~17.04.1) zesty-proposed; urgency=medium
* New upstream snapshot.
- net: fix reading and rendering addresses in cidr format.
[Dimitri John
This bug was fixed in the package cloud-init - 0.7.9-153-g16a7302f-
0ubuntu1~16.04.1
---
cloud-init (0.7.9-153-g16a7302f-0ubuntu1~16.04.1) xenial-proposed;
urgency=medium
* New upstream snapshot.
- net: fix reading and rendering addresses in cidr format.
[Dimitri John
The verification of the Stable Release Update for cloud-init has
completed successfully and the package has now been released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you
This bug was fixed in the package cloud-init - 0.7.9-153-g16a7302f-
0ubuntu1~16.10.1
---
cloud-init (0.7.9-153-g16a7302f-0ubuntu1~16.10.1) yakkety-proposed;
urgency=medium
* New upstream snapshot.
- net: fix reading and rendering addresses in cidr format.
[Dimitri John
The verification of the Stable Release Update for cloud-init has
completed successfully and the package has now been released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you
This bug was fixed in the package cloud-init - 0.7.9-153-g16a7302f-
0ubuntu1~16.04.1
---
cloud-init (0.7.9-153-g16a7302f-0ubuntu1~16.04.1) xenial-proposed;
urgency=medium
* New upstream snapshot.
- net: fix reading and rendering addresses in cidr format.
[Dimitri John
This bug was fixed in the package cloud-init - 0.7.9-153-g16a7302f-
0ubuntu1~17.04.1
---
cloud-init (0.7.9-153-g16a7302f-0ubuntu1~17.04.1) zesty-proposed; urgency=medium
* New upstream snapshot.
- net: fix reading and rendering addresses in cidr format.
[Dimitri John
501 - 600 of 1096 matches
Mail list logo
