> Looking forward to see the patch landed as we use it at Fedora.
For what purpose? user.js shouldn't be used for anything mission
critical at all.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
> clang-format changed its mind, I guess?
No, chutten changed that code in bug 1435753. I generally run `./mach
clang-format -p modules/libpref`. Perhaps I should just run `./mach
clang-format` instead...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Comment on attachment 8931547
Bug 440908 - Allow preference files to set locked prefs.
https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/202672/#review208008
As per our IRC discussion, I think this is a good feature, and the patch
does a good job of implementing it. But before doing this I'd like to
officially
Created attachment 8956311
Bug 440908 - Convert sticky prefs in default pref files to the new syntax.
Review commit: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/225186/diff/#index_header
See other reviews: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/225186/
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
Hp is a complete Linux enemy
Hp Computer:
[serdar@archlinux Desktop]$ uname -a
Linux archlinux 5.1.12-arch1-1-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Wed Jun 19 09:16:00 UTC 2019
x86_64 GNU/Linux
[serdar@archlinux Desktop]$ dmesg | grep Error
[1.813390] RAS: Correctable Errors collector initialized.
[
(In reply to Mike Kaply [:mkaply] from comment #28)
> I really don't want it being called lockPref. That will confuse it with the
> autoconfig "lockPref" function.
What is confusing? It's the same syntax. The only difference aiui, is
the execution environment, which means autoconf can do more
Created attachment 8613433
Allow .js preference files to set locked prefs with lockPref()
Refreshed after bug 1098343. Benjamin, would you like to review this,
this time, considering comment 26?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
To expound on what :glandium said:
Extensions can lock preferences with:
Components.classes["@mozilla.org/preferences-service;1"]
.getService(Components.interfaces.nsIPrefService)
.getBranch(null)
.lockPref("name_of_pref");
Locking a preference doesn't
(In reply to Mike Hommey (VAC: 31 Dec - 11 Jan) [:glandium] from comment #40)
> (In reply to Mike Kaply [:mkaply] from comment #39)
> > Oddly, this document:
> >
> > https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Preferences/
> > A_brief_guide_to_Mozilla_preferences
> >
> > Says we already
Created attachment 8931547
Bug 440908 - Allow preference files to set locked prefs.
Review commit: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/202672/diff/#index_header
See other reviews: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/202672/
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
user.js was never intended to be an enterprise level feature for
configuration of Firefox. I don't recommend using it for that.
For enterprise configuration, we have provided Autoconfig since day one,
and we are working on a better solution involving JSON, GPO and possibly
authors.
Our goal is
(In reply to Mike Hommey [:glandium] from comment #46)
> The preferences code is being heavily refactored, and this needs to wait a
> bit for things to settle first. That being said, I do think the ideal timing
> for this would be to get it into 60. Nick, what do you think?
If things go well with
I was only referring to the use of user.js for enterprise. I do
understand that it's worthwhile to have locking of prefs in JS file for
Firefox purposes.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
The ability to lock prefs at the .js level is not *only* for enterprise
customization. Specifically, we have many "prefs" that are meant to
allow e.g. per channel (release, beta, nightly) tweaks but are not meant
for users to change. There are multiple such footguns that would be
avoided by having
Created attachment 8956309
Bug 440908 - Remove gIsAnyPrefLocked.
It optimizes Preferences::IsLocked(), but that function is called fewer than
200 times while starting the browser and opening a range of tabs.
Review commit: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/225182/diff/#index_header
See other
(In reply to Benjamin Smedberg [:bsmedberg] from comment #36)
> Comment on attachment 8613433
> Allow .js preference files to set locked prefs with lockPref()
>
> Because this came up on the mailing list, I'll try to be explicit about the
> decision here. I don't think we should allow extensions
Comment on attachment 8956310
Bug 440908 - Add support for `sticky` and `locked` attributes to default prefs.
https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/225184/#review231212
::: modules/libpref/Preferences.cpp:3982
(Diff revision 1)
> -Preferences::GetCString(kChannelPref, updateChannelPrefValue,
> -
Comment on attachment 8956309
Bug 440908 - Remove gIsAnyPrefLocked.
https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/225182/#review231210
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/541951
Title:
Firefox 3.6
Comment on attachment 8956311
Bug 440908 - Convert sticky prefs in default pref files to the new syntax.
https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/225186/#review231216
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/prepare-package
Status: New => Confirmed
** Description changed:
This bug will contain status and test results related to a kernel source
(or snap) as stated in the title.
For an explanation of the tasks and the associated workflow see:
This bug was fixed in the package linux-oem-osp1 - 5.0.0-1012.13
---
linux-oem-osp1 (5.0.0-1012.13) bionic; urgency=medium
* linux-oem-osp1: 5.0.0-1012.13 -proposed tracker (LP: #1833932)
* Add DMIC support to oem-kernel (LP: #1826181)
- ASoC: SOF: Intel: hda: reduce ifdef
I removed snap because of this issue and because of the developer
responses. This is really a very basic good-neighbor policy that all
software should respect - and by and large, almost all other software
I've used in the last decade does. There is in my mind no justifiable
excuse for putting off
This bug was fixed in the package linux-oem-osp1 - 5.0.0-1012.13
---
linux-oem-osp1 (5.0.0-1012.13) bionic; urgency=medium
* linux-oem-osp1: 5.0.0-1012.13 -proposed tracker (LP: #1833932)
* Add DMIC support to oem-kernel (LP: #1826181)
- ASoC: SOF: Intel: hda: reduce ifdef
** Bug watch added: Mozilla Bugzilla #976334
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=976334
** Bug watch added: Mozilla Bugzilla #1428920
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1428920
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/prepare-package
Status: New => Confirmed
** Description changed:
This bug will contain status and test results related to a kernel source
(or snap) as stated in the title.
For an explanation of the tasks and the associated workflow see:
** Description changed:
This bug will contain status and test results related to a kernel source
(or snap) as stated in the title.
For an explanation of the tasks and the associated workflow see:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/kernel-sru-workflow
-- swm properties --
Public bug reported:
Details here (video): https://photos.app.goo.gl/ct368UvcyAC2h7N96
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 19.10
Package: gnome-shell 3.32.2-2ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.0.0-17.18-generic 5.0.8
Uname: Linux 5.0.0-17-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu3
I am having text flashing issues in several text editors. Loading a
large file causing the scrollbar to appear stops the issue. Linux Mint
19, i see it in gedit and xed. I'm on a MS Surface Pro-4 with the
jakeday kernel installed.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1835059 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1835059
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1835059
install crash
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1835059 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1835059
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1835059
install crash
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Description changed:
This bug will contain status and test results related to a kernel source
(or snap) as stated in the title.
For an explanation of the tasks and the associated workflow see:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/kernel-sru-workflow
backports: bug 1834950
** Summary changed:
- icon cache generation failure
+ elementary icon cache generation failure
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/962225
Title:
elementary icon cache generation failure
This bug was fixed in the package octavia - 4.0.0-0ubuntu1.1~cloud0
---
octavia (4.0.0-0ubuntu1.1~cloud0) bionic-stein; urgency=medium
.
* New update for the Ubuntu Cloud Archive.
.
octavia (4.0.0-0ubuntu1.1) disco; urgency=medium
.
[ Corey Bryant ]
* d/gbp.conf: Create
The verification of the Stable Release Update for octavia has completed
successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. In the
event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates
please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report
regression-update so
** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/automated-testing
Status: Incomplete => In Progress
** Description changed:
This bug will contain status and test results related to a kernel source
(or snap) as stated in the title.
For an explanation of the tasks and the associated workflow
Hello errors.ubuntu.com, or anyone else affected,
Accepted gnome-shell into disco-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-
shell/3.32.2-2ubuntu1~ubuntu19.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.
Please help us by
** Description changed:
This bug will contain status and test results related to a kernel source
(or snap) as stated in the title.
For an explanation of the tasks and the associated workflow see:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/kernel-sru-workflow
backports: bug 1834701
** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/stakeholder-signoff
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1834701
Title:
linux-azure: 4.18.0-1024.25~18.04.1
** Description changed:
This bug will contain status and test results related to a kernel source
(or snap) as stated in the title.
For an explanation of the tasks and the associated workflow see:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/kernel-sru-workflow
backports: bug 1834916
** Description changed:
This bug will contain status and test results related to a kernel source
(or snap) as stated in the title.
For an explanation of the tasks and the associated workflow see:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/kernel-sru-workflow
backports: bug 1834898
** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/stakeholder-signoff
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1834715
Title:
linux-azure: 4.15.0-1050.55 -proposed
** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/prepare-package
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/prepare-package-signed
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
** Description changed:
This bug will contain status and test results related to a kernel source
** Information type changed from Public to Public Security
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1835095
Title:
Lubuntu initrd images leaking cryptographic secret when disk
encryption is
Public bug reported:
trying to install updates
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
Package: initramfs-tools 0.122ubuntu8.8
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.10.0-28.32~16.04.2-generic 4.10.17
Uname: Linux 4.10.0-28-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.10
AptOrdering:
** Description changed:
This bug will contain status and test results related to a kernel source
(or snap) as stated in the title.
For an explanation of the tasks and the associated workflow see:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/kernel-sru-workflow
backports: bug 1834903
** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/prepare-package
Status: New => Confirmed
** Description changed:
This bug will contain status and test results related to a kernel source
(or snap) as stated in the title.
For an explanation of the tasks and the associated workflow see:
** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/prepare-package
Status: New => Confirmed
** Description changed:
This bug will contain status and test results related to a kernel source
(or snap) as stated in the title.
For an explanation of the tasks and the associated workflow see:
** Description changed:
This bug will contain status and test results related to a kernel source
(or snap) as stated in the title.
For an explanation of the tasks and the associated workflow see:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/kernel-sru-workflow
-- swm properties --
** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/prepare-package
Status: New => Confirmed
** Description changed:
This bug will contain status and test results related to a kernel source
(or snap) as stated in the title.
For an explanation of the tasks and the associated workflow see:
** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/stakeholder-signoff
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1834706
Title:
linux-azure: 5.0.0-1011.11 -proposed
** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/stakeholder-signoff
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1834714
Title:
linux-azure: 4.15.0-1050.55~14.04.1
Verified the test case using gnome-settings-daemon 3.28.1-0ubuntu1.3
from bionic-proposed.
** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-bionic
** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-bionic
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/stakeholder-signoff
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1834702
Title:
linux-azure: 4.18.0-1024.25 -proposed
** Description changed:
This bug will contain status and test results related to a kernel source
(or snap) as stated in the title.
For an explanation of the tasks and the associated workflow see:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/kernel-sru-workflow
derivatives: bug 1834700
** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/prepare-package
Status: New => Confirmed
** Description changed:
This bug will contain status and test results related to a kernel source
(or snap) as stated in the title.
For an explanation of the tasks and the associated workflow see:
** Description changed:
Snappy has a feature where the user can state when in a month to refresh
(update) their snaps. Please provide options in Software & Updates to
control this.
- https://snapdocs.labix.org/configuration-options/87
+ https://docs.snapcraft.io/system-options
ccooke: As another Ubuntu user, I think I can answer this:
Please check the top of this bug report, where you will see two affected
projects: "Subiquity" and "Subiquity (Ubuntu)". The former is the
'upstream project', or the 'original software', the latter its
integration into Ubuntu. While
** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/prepare-package
Status: New => Confirmed
** Description changed:
This bug will contain status and test results related to a kernel source
(or snap) as stated in the title.
For an explanation of the tasks and the associated workflow see:
** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/prepare-package
Status: New => Confirmed
** Description changed:
This bug will contain status and test results related to a kernel source
(or snap) as stated in the title.
For an explanation of the tasks and the associated workflow see:
Yuck. This is quite awkward. Neither half of probert wants the other
half.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1834897
Title:
probert has too many dependencies for consoleconf
To
Thank you for your bug report, maybe you could post on
https://forum.snapcraft.io/ about it? Snap related features are usually
discussed there
** Changed in: software-properties (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
The golang-collectd (armhf) autopkgtest seems to have failed due to an
unrelated network error:
> Could not connect to ftpmaster.internal:80 (91.189.89.99), connection
timed out
I am guessing that this was a temporary error and is fixed by simply
retrying, but I do not have permissions to do
Filed an upstream issue:
https://github.com/CanonicalLtd/probert/issues/70
** Bug watch added: github.com/CanonicalLtd/probert/issues #70
https://github.com/CanonicalLtd/probert/issues/70
** Changed in: probert (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: probert (Ubuntu)
Thank you for your bug report. Could you add your 'journalctl -b 0' log
after getting the issue?
** Changed in: gnome-software (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Low
** Changed in: gnome-software (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are
** Summary changed:
- linux-fips: -proposed tracker
+ linux-fips: 4.15.0-1011.12 -proposed tracker
** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/prepare-package
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/prepare-package
Assignee: Canonical Kernel Team
** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/prepare-package
Status: New => Confirmed
** Description changed:
This bug will contain status and test results related to a kernel source
(or snap) as stated in the title.
For an explanation of the tasks and the associated workflow see:
Hello, and thank you for opening this report.
Upon further review, this bug report as-is is not yet ready to be
considered for Sponsoring in Ubuntu, as it does not yet provide
justification for the change nor does it provide requisite information
to determine whether this change is even sensible
** Project changed: extreme-citadel-208123 => snapcraft
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1613898
Title:
Python easy_install fails when second of two python parts builds
To manage
** Changed in: snapcraft
Assignee: Rohit travels & tours (rtatnet2) => Sergio Schvezov (sergiusens)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1613898
Title:
Python easy_install fails when
The bash completion bug was fixed.
I'm inclined to say that if character classes are needed, gawk should be
used. It looks like mawk has stalled, and the call to switch to Thomas
Dickey's fork isn't mine to make. We are following debian on this one.
** Changed in: mawk (Ubuntu)
Importance:
The bash completion bug was fixed.
I'm inclined to say that if character classes are needed, gawk should be
used. It looks like mawk has stalled, and the call to switch to Thomas
Dickey's fork isn't mine to make. We are following debian on this one.
** Changed in: mawk (Ubuntu)
Importance:
** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/promote-to-updates
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/promote-to-updates
Assignee: Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team (ubuntu-sru) => Andy
Whitcroft (apw)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/promote-to-updates
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/promote-to-updates
Assignee: Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team (ubuntu-sru) => Andy
Whitcroft (apw)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/promote-to-updates
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/promote-to-updates
Assignee: Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team (ubuntu-sru) => Andy
Whitcroft (apw)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
Hello Gunnar, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-docs into disco-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-docs/19.04.3
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/promote-to-updates
Status: New => Confirmed
** Tags removed: block-proposed-bionic
** Tags removed: block-proposed
** Description changed:
This bug will contain status and test results related to a kernel source
(or snap) as stated in the title.
** Summary changed:
- CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP is not set in ubuntu 18.04 (armhf and aarch64)
+ CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP is not set in ubuntu 18.04 aarch64,arm64
** Description changed:
Would it be possible to enable rockchip support in Ubuntu 18.04 kernel
- for arch armhf and aarch64?
+ for arch
** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/regression-testing
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1834724
Title:
linux-azure-edge: 4.18.0.1024.23
All 3 test kernels look good. Tested on internal ryzen development
boards that were showing this symptom previously.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1796443
Title:
HP EliteBook 745
Public bug reported:
I have a VPS with Ubuntu 18.04 (pure software implementation, Digital
Ocean) and I connect through Windows 10 with an X server, Xming, and I
run google-chrome remote. It works well and opens the chrome remote on
my Windows, although quite slow, but it works. However, it
** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/promote-to-updates
Status: New => Confirmed
** Tags removed: block-proposed-disco
** Tags removed: block-proposed
** Description changed:
This bug will contain status and test results related to a kernel source
(or snap) as stated in the title.
** Summary changed:
- linux-raspi2: -proposed tracker
+ linux-raspi2: 4.4.0-1115.124 -proposed tracker
** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/prepare-package
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/prepare-package
Assignee: Canonical Kernel Team
** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/promote-to-updates
Status: New => Confirmed
** Tags removed: block-proposed-xenial
** Tags removed: block-proposed
** Description changed:
This bug will contain status and test results related to a kernel source
(or snap) as stated in the title.
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: lubuntu-meta (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1835095
** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/promote-to-updates
Status: New => Confirmed
** Tags removed: block-proposed-trusty
** Tags removed: block-proposed
** Description changed:
This bug will contain status and test results related to a kernel source
(or snap) as stated in the title.
Public bug reported:
This bug will contain status and test results related to a kernel source
(or snap) as stated in the title.
For an explanation of the tasks and the associated workflow see:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/kernel-sru-workflow
-- swm properties --
kernel-stable-master-bug:
** Description changed:
This bug will contain status and test results related to a kernel source
(or snap) as stated in the title.
For an explanation of the tasks and the associated workflow see:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/kernel-sru-workflow
- derivatives: bug 1835108
** Summary changed:
- linux-raspi2: -proposed tracker
+ linux-raspi2: 4.15.0-1041.44 -proposed tracker
** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/prepare-package
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/prepare-package
Assignee: Canonical Kernel Team
** Package changed: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu) => snapd (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1835102
Title:
md5sum: /etc/apparmor.d/usr.lib.snapd.snap-confine: no such file or
** Changed in: gnome-software (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Low
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1835073
Title:
Put filename path of .deb package on a different line
To manage
Thank you for your bug report, is that .bashrc.d directory something
standard/documented upstream? could you give some reference/context to
the change?
** Changed in: bash (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Public bug reported:
[Availability]
ec2-instance-connect is in the Ubuntu archive, and available for all supported
releases. It is available on all architectures despite only being useful on
Amazon EC2 instances.
[Rationale]
This package is useful on Amazon EC2 instances to make use of a new
On 02/07/2019, Rüdiger Kupper wrote:
> Is the hpcups driver actually being maintained by HP? Or is this a
> community driver?
I don't know (and I don't even know how to find out!) I also don't
know whether the following info has any relevance to your question
or not, but:
** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/promote-to-security
Status: New => Invalid
** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/security-signoff
Status: New => Invalid
** Description changed:
This bug will contain status and test results related to a kernel source
(or snap) as stated in the
** Description changed:
This bug will contain status and test results related to a kernel source
(or snap) as stated in the title.
For an explanation of the tasks and the associated workflow see:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/kernel-sru-workflow
derivatives: bug 1834922
The same problem
Dell Vostro 5648, i5-7200U
Even more, after pressing any time CTR-ALT-F#
Gnome desktop process terminates and i've got
[drm:intel_cpu_fifo_underrun_irq_handler [i915]] *ERROR* CPU pipe B FIFO
underrun
[drm:intel_cpu_fifo_underrun_irq_handler [i915]] *ERROR* CPU pipe A FIFO
** Description changed:
This bug will contain status and test results related to a kernel source
(or snap) as stated in the title.
For an explanation of the tasks and the associated workflow see:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/kernel-sru-workflow
backports: bug 1834903
** Description changed:
This bug will contain status and test results related to a kernel source
(or snap) as stated in the title.
For an explanation of the tasks and the associated workflow see:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/kernel-sru-workflow
backports: bug 1834916
** Description changed:
This bug will contain status and test results related to a kernel source
(or snap) as stated in the title.
For an explanation of the tasks and the associated workflow see:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/kernel-sru-workflow
backports: bug 1834898
** Description changed:
This bug will contain status and test results related to a kernel source
(or snap) as stated in the title.
For an explanation of the tasks and the associated workflow see:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/kernel-sru-workflow
backports: bug 1834950
201 - 300 of 828 matches
Mail list logo
