[Bug 1902343] Re: Please merge xmobar 0.36-2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2021-01-06 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package xmobar - 0.36-2ubuntu1

---
xmobar (0.36-2ubuntu1) hirsute; urgency=medium

  * Merge newer version from Debian (LP: #1902343)
  * Remaining changes:
d/tests/xmobar: wait a little longer for X server to be ready.

xmobar (0.36-2) unstable; urgency=medium

  * Move maintenance under DHG
+ Move myself to Uploaders
+ Point Vcs-* to the DHG_packages repository
  * Enable ALSA support; thanks to William Wilhelm
+ B-D on libghc-alsa-core-dev and libghc-alsa-mixer-dev

xmobar (0.36-1) unstable; urgency=medium

  * New upstream version 0.36
  * d/copyright: bump years
  * d/rules: replace with_conduit w/ with_weather
 xmobar (0.33-1ubuntu1) groovy; urgency=medium

  * d/tests/xmobar: wait a little longer for X server to be ready.

 -- Hans Joachim Desserud   Tue, 10 Nov 2020
17:54:51 +0100

** Changed in: xmobar (Ubuntu)
   Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1902343

Title:
  Please merge xmobar 0.36-2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xmobar/+bug/1902343/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1908761] Re: Can't deploy using root XFS partition using 18.04

2021-01-06 Thread Eric Desrochers
As follow:
https://salsa.debian.org/grub-team/grub/-/commit/01f1eee93acd4113475b403f80661cf651fbcc00

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1908761

Title:
  Can't deploy using root XFS partition using 18.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/curtin/+bug/1908761/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1910279] Re: mate-session starts instead when i3 was selected on login screen

2021-01-06 Thread Norbert
** Tags added: hirsute

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1910279

Title:
  mate-session starts instead when i3 was selected on login screen

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/mate-desktop/+bug/1910279/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1900775] Re: Cinder fails to create image-based volume if mirroring is enabled

2021-01-06 Thread Corey Bryant
This in Ubuntu hirsute (wallaby) in cinder version
2:17.0.1+git2021010614.a9c922ab7-0ubuntu1.

** Changed in: cinder (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1900775

Title:
  Cinder fails to create image-based volume if mirroring is enabled

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/charm-ceph-rbd-mirror/+bug/1900775/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1872268] Re: Gnome Shell completely freezes in Ubuntu 20.04 when clicking outside of app icon folders (when ubuntu-dock is loaded)

2021-01-06 Thread Jehú Marcos Herrera Puentes
Now it works, thanks.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1872268

Title:
  Gnome Shell completely freezes in Ubuntu 20.04 when clicking outside
  of app icon folders (when ubuntu-dock is loaded)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock/+bug/1872268/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1909603] Re: fwupd-refresh.service: Failed with result 'exit-code'

2021-01-06 Thread Lyubomir
Now it seems that it succeeded. There are network problems sometimes,
but most of the time there is an internet connection. Maybe 3-4 times
per day for about 10 seconds at max there isn't internet.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909603

Title:
  fwupd-refresh.service: Failed with result 'exit-code'

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fwupd/+bug/1909603/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1900141] Re: overlay: permission regression in 5.4.0-51.56 due to patches related to CVE-2020-16120

2021-01-06 Thread Seth Forshee
** Description changed:

+ SRU Justification
+ 
+ [Impact]
+ 
+ The backports to fix CVE-2020-16120 introduced a regression for overlay
+ mounts within user namespaces. Files with ownership outside of the user
+ namespace can no longer be accessed, even if allowed by both DAC and
+ MAC.
+ 
+ This issue is fixed by the following upstream commit:
+ 
+ 
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=b6650dab404c701d7fe08a108b746542a934da84
+ 
+ This commit relaxes the check to remove O_NOATIME from the open flags
+ for the file in the lower filesystem when the overlay filesystem mounter
+ is not privileged with respect to the underlying inode, rather than
+ failing the open as happens now.
+ 
+ [Test Case]
+ 
+ The attached lp1900141.sh script reproduces the issue.
+ 
+ [Where problems could occur]
+ 
+ For the most part this patch restores previous behavior of allowing
+ access to these files while keeping the enhanced permission checks
+ towards the lower filesystem to help prevent unauthorized access to file
+ data in the lower filesystem. The one difference in behavior is that
+ files in the lower filesystem may no longer be opened with the O_NOATIME
+ flag, potentially causing atime updates for these files which were not
+ happening before. If any software expects O_NOATIME behavior in this
+ situation then it could cause problems for that software. However, the
+ correct behavior is that only the inode owner or a process with
+ CAP_FOWNER towards the inode owner is allowed to open with O_NOATIME (as
+ documented in open(2)).
+ 
+ ---
+ 
  We use unprivileged user namespaces with overlay mounts for containers.
  After recently upgrading our Focal kernels to 5.4.0-51.56 this breaks,
  one cannot access files through the overlay mount in the container
  anymore. This is very likely caused by some of the patches that were
  added in relation to CVE-2020-16120.
  
  The following commands allow to reproduce the problem when executed as
  an arbitrary non-root user:
  
  mkdir /tmp/test /tmp/test/upper /tmp/test/work /tmp/test/usr
  unshare -m -U -r /bin/sh -c "mount -t overlay none /tmp/test/usr -o 
lowerdir=/usr,upperdir=/tmp/test/upper,workdir=/tmp/test/work; ls -l 
/tmp/test/usr/bin/id; file /tmp/test/usr/bin/id; /tmp/test/usr/bin/id"
  
  The output when broken is this:
  
  -rwxr-xr-x 1 nobody nogroup 47480 Sep  5  2019 /tmp/test/usr/bin/id
  /tmp/test/usr/bin/id: executable, regular file, no read permission
  /bin/sh: 1: /tmp/test/usr/bin/id: Operation not permitted
  
  The expected output is this:
  
  -rwxr-xr-x 1 nobody nogroup 43224 Jan 18  2018 /tmp/test/usr/bin/id
  /tmp/test/usr/bin/id: ELF 64-bit LSB shared object, ...
  uid=0(root) gid=0(root) groups=0(root),65534(nogroup)
  
  These commands create a user namespace and within it mount an overlay of
  /usr to /tmp/test/usr and then try to access something in it.
  
  This works on Ubuntu Bionic with kernel 4.15.0-121.123 (note that this
  already includes a fix for CVE-2020-16120) and on kernel 5.4.0-48.52 but
  is broken on kernel 5.4.0-51.56, no matter whether on Bionic or Focal.
  
  So I strongly suspect that not the actual security fixes for
  CVE-2020-16120 are the cause, but one of the following two patches that
  according to the changelogs were applied in the same revision but only
  to 5.4, not to 4.15:
  
  ovl: call secutiry hook in ovl_real_ioctl()
  ovl: check permission to open real file
  
  The mail with the announcement (https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-
  security/2020/10/13/6) lists these two commits as separate from the
  actual security fixes ("may be desired or necessary").
  
  Is it possible to revert these two changes or fix them such that our
  unprivileged containers work again on Ubuntu kernel 5.4? Or is there a
  workaround that I can add to my container solution such that this use
  case works again?
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: linux-image-5.4.0-51-generic 5.4.0-51.56
  ProcVersionSignature: User Name 5.4.0-51.56-generic 5.4.65
  Uname: Linux 5.4.0-51-generic x86_64
  AlsaDevices:
-  total 0
-  crw-rw 1 root audio 116,  1 Oct 14 04:48 seq
-  crw-rw 1 root audio 116, 33 Oct 14 04:48 timer
+  total 0
+  crw-rw 1 root audio 116,  1 Oct 14 04:48 seq
+  crw-rw 1 root audio 116, 33 Oct 14 04:48 timer
  AplayDevices: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'aplay'
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.9
  Architecture: amd64
  ArecordDevices: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'arecord'
  AudioDevicesInUse: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'fuser'
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  CurrentDmesg: Error: command ['dmesg'] failed with exit code 1: dmesg: read 
kernel buffer failed: Operation not permitted
  Date: Fri Oct 16 13:02:32 2020
  IwConfig: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'iwconfig'
  Lsusb:
-  Bus 001 Device 002: ID 0627:0001 Adomax Technology Co., Ltd QEMU USB Tablet
-  Bus 001 Device 001: ID 

[Bug 1910453] [NEW] Touchpad not recognized on Lenovo Laptop

2021-01-06 Thread Ran Mishael
Public bug reported:

I was following the instructions in the following link:

https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingTouchpadDetection#Some_general_work_flow_for_Triagers

After entering xinput in the terminal the expected out did not appear.

Release info:
Description:Ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS
Release:20.04

Package version:
unable to find package version according to the terminal output.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
Package: linux-image-5.8.0-34-generic 5.8.0-34.37~20.04.2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.8.0-34.37~20.04.2-generic 5.8.18
Uname: Linux 5.8.0-34-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.14
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Wed Jan  6 23:05:52 2021
InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-01-06 (0 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20200731)
SourcePackage: linux-signed-hwe-5.8
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: linux-signed-hwe-5.8 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug focal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1910453

Title:
  Touchpad not recognized on Lenovo Laptop

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-signed-hwe-5.8/+bug/1910453/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1909845] Re: TouchPad Not Working

2021-01-06 Thread Paulo Flabiano Smorigo
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug.  I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privilege boundaries nor directly cause loss of data/privacy.
Please feel free to report any other bugs you may find.

** Information type changed from Private Security to Public

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909845

Title:
  TouchPad Not Working

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1909845/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1909765] Re: package grub-efi-amd64-signed 1.155.1+2.04-1ubuntu35.1 failed to install/upgrade: o subprocesso instalado, do pacote grub-efi-amd64-signed, o script post-installation retornou erro d

2021-01-06 Thread Paulo Flabiano Smorigo
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug.  I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privilege boundaries nor directly cause loss of data/privacy.
Please feel free to report any other bugs you may find.

** Information type changed from Private Security to Public

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909765

Title:
  package grub-efi-amd64-signed 1.155.1+2.04-1ubuntu35.1 failed to
  install/upgrade: o subprocesso instalado, do pacote grub-efi-
  amd64-signed, o script post-installation retornou erro do status de
  saída 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2-signed/+bug/1909765/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1909896] Re: package virtualbox-ext-pack 6.1.14-2 failed to install/upgrade: installed virtualbox-ext-pack package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

2021-01-06 Thread Apport retracing service
** Tags removed: need-duplicate-check

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909896

Title:
  package virtualbox-ext-pack 6.1.14-2 failed to install/upgrade:
  installed virtualbox-ext-pack package post-installation script
  subprocess returned error exit status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/virtualbox-ext-pack/+bug/1909896/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1909621] Re: my gnome control center is not opeaning and working

2021-01-06 Thread Paulo Flabiano Smorigo
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug.  I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privilege boundaries nor directly cause loss of data/privacy.
Please feel free to report any other bugs you may find.

** Information type changed from Private Security to Public

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909621

Title:
  my gnome control center is not opeaning and working

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/1909621/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1909512] Re: its suddenly stop instaling ubuntu

2021-01-06 Thread Paulo Flabiano Smorigo
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug.  I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privilege boundaries nor directly cause loss of data/privacy.
Please feel free to report any other bugs you may find.

** Information type changed from Private Security to Public

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909512

Title:
  its suddenly stop instaling ubuntu

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub-installer/+bug/1909512/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1909364] Re: Please Help My Package Is Correct and crashed

2021-01-06 Thread Paulo Flabiano Smorigo
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug.  I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privilege boundaries nor directly cause loss of data/privacy.
Please feel free to report any other bugs you may find.

** Information type changed from Private Security to Public

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909364

Title:
  Please Help My Package Is Correct and crashed

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1909364/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1909622] Re: lubuntu hirsute install; calamares error

2021-01-06 Thread Chris Guiver
I wonder if this warrants mention in the release notes as the 'fix'
(in April; maybe with reference to Walter's comment #11 though that adds length)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909622

Title:
  lubuntu hirsute install; calamares error

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/calamares/+bug/1909622/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1909506] Re: lubuntu hirsute daily install failed - error message to large for screen

2021-01-06 Thread Walter Lapchynski
I'm surprised this hasn't come up before. I'm expecting to get someone
telling me this is a duplicate upstream, but I couldn't find a similar
issue, so we'll see.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909506

Title:
  lubuntu hirsute daily install failed  - error message to large for
  screen

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/calamares/+bug/1909506/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1909506] Re: lubuntu hirsute daily install failed - error message to large for screen

2021-01-06 Thread Walter Lapchynski
Ugh that comment was meant for another bug. Please ignore #4.

** No longer affects: calamares

** Bug watch added: Calamares Issues #1613
   https://github.com/calamares/calamares/issues/1613

** Also affects: calamares via
   https://github.com/calamares/calamares/issues/1613
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909506

Title:
  lubuntu hirsute daily install failed  - error message to large for
  screen

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/calamares/+bug/1909506/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1905519] Re: Object St.Bin (0x565425162c80), has been already deallocated — impossible to set any property on it. This might be caused by the object having been destroyed from C code using someth

2021-01-06 Thread KimKulak
I can confirm #4, triggered by updates. Can be stopped by restarting
Gnome Shell.

ALT+F2 r ENTER

Thank you

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1905519

Title:
  Object St.Bin (0x565425162c80), has been already deallocated —
  impossible to set any property on it. This might be caused by the
  object having been destroyed from C code using something such as
  destroy(), dispose(), or remove() vfuncs.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/dash-to-dock/+bug/1905519/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1903081] Re: Unable to update colorhug firmware

2021-01-06 Thread Mario Limonciello
It seems the GUIDs do match.  This seems like a peculiar bug, maybe
around some other requirements that are set.

Would you mind trying to install the CAB like this:

# fwupdmgr install foo.cab

And see what the message tells you?


** Changed in: fwupd (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1903081

Title:
  Unable to update colorhug firmware

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fwupd/+bug/1903081/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1886976] Re: package libfwupdplugin1:amd64 1.3.9-4ubuntu0.1 failed to install/upgrade: problemas de dependência - deixando desconfigurado

2021-01-06 Thread Mario Limonciello
Has this gotten sorted out?  It seems you should be able to do:
# apt install libfwupd2

To sort it out.

** Changed in: fwupd (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1886976

Title:
  package libfwupdplugin1:amd64 1.3.9-4ubuntu0.1 failed to
  install/upgrade: problemas de dependência - deixando desconfigurado

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fwupd/+bug/1886976/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1881947] Re: Assertion 'r >= 0' failed at src/journal/test-journal-flush.c:52, function main(). Aborting.

2021-01-06 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Merge proposal linked:
   
https://code.launchpad.net/~ddstreet/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+git/systemd/+merge/395861

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1881947

Title:
  Assertion 'r >= 0' failed at src/journal/test-journal-flush.c:52,
  function main(). Aborting.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/systemd/+bug/1881947/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1909603] Re: fwupd-refresh.service: Failed with result 'exit-code'

2021-01-06 Thread Mario Limonciello
Do you know if you were offline at that time?  Would you mind double
checking if you can run it now and see if it reproduces?

# systemctl start fwupd-refresh.service

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909603

Title:
  fwupd-refresh.service: Failed with result 'exit-code'

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fwupd/+bug/1909603/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1759715] Re: Remove steam and add to sync blacklist

2021-01-06 Thread Andrew Hayzen
So 1.0.0.67-2 has landed in hiruste (which is much closer to debian
sid). I also plan to sync hirsute again before freezes and then intend
to continue updating ubuntu devel to be as close as possible to debian
sid - I will also investigate any SRU opportunities to fix features that
are broken in older releases.

So for now lets mark this as invalid, if in the future I am not able to
keep steam up to date, then this discussion/bug can be reopened.

** Changed in: steam (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1759715

Title:
  Remove steam and add to sync blacklist

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/steam/+bug/1759715/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1881947] Re: Assertion 'r >= 0' failed at src/journal/test-journal-flush.c:52, function main(). Aborting.

2021-01-06 Thread Dan Streetman
** Also affects: systemd (Ubuntu Hirsute)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Hirsute)
   Status: New => In Progress

** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Hirsute)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Dan Streetman (ddstreet)

** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Hirsute)
   Importance: Undecided => Low

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1881947

Title:
  Assertion 'r >= 0' failed at src/journal/test-journal-flush.c:52,
  function main(). Aborting.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/systemd/+bug/1881947/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1908761] Re: Can't deploy using root XFS partition using 18.04

2021-01-06 Thread Ryan Harper
@Eric

Yeah, I *think* that will work; I believe at the time I manually
performed that step and it worked.

I'm not sure w.r.t Secure Boot and shim-signed;  Maybe @vorlon can
confirm if the xfs grub2 module is signed/included in shim-signed?

> As follow:
> https://salsa.debian.org/grub-team/grub/-/commit/01f1eee93acd4113475b403f80661cf651fbcc00

Ah, that's adding it to the signed bits... that looks promising.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1908761

Title:
  Can't deploy using root XFS partition using 18.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/curtin/+bug/1908761/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1908761] Re: Can't deploy using root XFS partition using 18.04

2021-01-06 Thread Ryan Harper
You might just mark this bug duplicate of the other so we can close both
if this fixes things; and if so, I can update our vmtest which exercises
this path.   Note this is broken all the way back through Xenial.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1908761

Title:
  Can't deploy using root XFS partition using 18.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/curtin/+bug/1908761/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1901689] Re: Merge steam 1.0.0.67-2 from debian sid to ubuntu hirsute

2021-01-06 Thread Andrew Hayzen
I'll take a look and see if I can do anything :-) Thanks!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1901689

Title:
  Merge steam 1.0.0.67-2 from debian sid to ubuntu hirsute

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/steam/+bug/1901689/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1909698] Re: new upstream release 2020f

2021-01-06 Thread Brian Murray
Verified on xenial:

(xenial-amd64)root@impulse:~# apt-cache policy tzdata   
   
tzdata:
  Installed: 2020f-0ubuntu0.16.04
  Candidate: 2020f-0ubuntu0.16.04
  Version table:
 *** 2020f-0ubuntu0.16.04 500
500 http://archive.ubuntu.com//ubuntu xenial-proposed/main amd64 
Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
 2020d-0ubuntu0.16.04 500
500 http://ubuntu.osuosl.org/ubuntu xenial-updates/main amd64 Packages
500 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-security/main amd64 
Packages
 2016d-0ubuntu0.16.04 500
500 http://ubuntu.osuosl.org/ubuntu xenial/main amd64 Packages
(xenial-amd64)root@impulse:~# zdump -v Europe/Volgograd | tail -n6
Europe/Volgograd  Sat Oct 27 22:59:59 2018 UT = Sun Oct 28 01:59:59 2018 +03 
isdst=0 gmtoff=10800
Europe/Volgograd  Sat Oct 27 23:00:00 2018 UT = Sun Oct 28 03:00:00 2018 +04 
isdst=0 gmtoff=14400
Europe/Volgograd  Sat Dec 26 21:59:59 2020 UT = Sun Dec 27 01:59:59 2020 +04 
isdst=0 gmtoff=14400
Europe/Volgograd  Sat Dec 26 22:00:00 2020 UT = Sun Dec 27 01:00:00 2020 +03 
isdst=0 gmtoff=10800
Europe/Volgograd  9223372036854689407 = NULL
Europe/Volgograd  9223372036854775807 = NULL
(xenial-amd64)root@impulse:~# diff <(zdump -v America/Phoenix | cut -d' ' -f2-) 
<(zdump -v SystemV/MST7 | cut -d' ' -f2-)


** Tags removed: verification-needed-bionic verification-needed-xenial
** Tags added: verification-done-bionic verification-done-xenial

** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909698

Title:
  new upstream release 2020f

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tzdata/+bug/1909698/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1909622] Re: lubuntu hirsute install; calamares error

2021-01-06 Thread Walter Lapchynski
Well, I mean, I guess we don't make any release notes about the fact
that the other two sessions (Openbox, LXQt) will look and act really
weird relative to what one expects for Lubuntu, so I'm inclined to leave
it be. I'm open to thoughts on the matter, though.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909622

Title:
  lubuntu hirsute install; calamares error

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/calamares/+bug/1909622/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1901555] Re: [plugin][networking] Include ns ip neigh and ip rule info

2021-01-06 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Verification done for groovy-proposed.

The per-ns files for 'ip neigh' and 'ip rule' are now present.

$ echo "deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu $(lsb_release -cs)-proposed main 
universe" \
| sudo tee /etc/apt/sources.list.d/proposed.list \
&& sudo apt update \
&& sudo apt install -y sosreport conntrack conntrackd

$ sudo ip netns add ns1 && sudo ip netns add ns2 && sudo ip netns add
ns3

$ sudo ip netns
ns3
ns2
ns1

$ lsb_release -cs
groovy

$ dpkg -s sosreport | grep Version:
Version: 4.0-1ubuntu2.1

$ sudo sosreport --batch

$ sudo tar tf /tmp/sosreport-*.xz | grep sos_commands/networking | grep -e 
neigh -e rule | sort
sosreport-mfo-sos-g-2021-01-06-wkdqtsk/sos_commands/networking/ip_-4_rule
sosreport-mfo-sos-g-2021-01-06-wkdqtsk/sos_commands/networking/ip_-6_rule
sosreport-mfo-sos-g-2021-01-06-wkdqtsk/sos_commands/networking/ip_-s_-s_neigh_show
sosreport-mfo-sos-g-2021-01-06-wkdqtsk/sos_commands/networking/ip_neigh_show_nud_noarp
sosreport-mfo-sos-g-2021-01-06-wkdqtsk/sos_commands/networking/ip_netns_exec_ns1_ip_-s_-s_neigh_show
sosreport-mfo-sos-g-2021-01-06-wkdqtsk/sos_commands/networking/ip_netns_exec_ns1_ip_rule_list
sosreport-mfo-sos-g-2021-01-06-wkdqtsk/sos_commands/networking/ip_netns_exec_ns2_ip_-s_-s_neigh_show
sosreport-mfo-sos-g-2021-01-06-wkdqtsk/sos_commands/networking/ip_netns_exec_ns2_ip_rule_list
sosreport-mfo-sos-g-2021-01-06-wkdqtsk/sos_commands/networking/ip_netns_exec_ns3_ip_-s_-s_neigh_show
sosreport-mfo-sos-g-2021-01-06-wkdqtsk/sos_commands/networking/ip_netns_exec_ns3_ip_rule_list

** Tags removed: verification-needed-groovy
** Tags added: verification-done-groovy

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1901555

Title:
  [plugin][networking] Include ns ip neigh and ip rule info

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sosreport/+bug/1901555/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1898077] Re: [conntrackd][plugin] add conntrack info

2021-01-06 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Verification done for bionic-proposed.

The conntrack default ns and per-ns files for 'conntrack -L' and
'conntrack -S' are now present.

$ echo "deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu $(lsb_release -cs)-proposed main 
universe" \
| sudo tee /etc/apt/sources.list.d/proposed.list \
&& sudo apt update \
&& sudo apt install -y sosreport conntrack conntrackd

$ sudo ip netns add ns1 && sudo ip netns add ns2 && sudo ip netns add
ns3

$ sudo ip netns
ns3
ns2
ns1

$ lsb_release -cs
bionic

$ dpkg -s sosreport | grep Version:
Version: 3.9.1-1ubuntu0.18.04.3

$ sudo sosreport --batch

$ sudo tar tf /tmp/sosreport-*.xz | grep sos_commands/conntrack | sort
sosreport-mfo-sos-b-2021-01-06-kyiprqo/sos_commands/conntrack/
sosreport-mfo-sos-b-2021-01-06-kyiprqo/sos_commands/conntrack/conntrack_-L_-o_extended
sosreport-mfo-sos-b-2021-01-06-kyiprqo/sos_commands/conntrack/conntrack_-S
sosreport-mfo-sos-b-2021-01-06-kyiprqo/sos_commands/conntrack/conntrackd_-s_cache
sosreport-mfo-sos-b-2021-01-06-kyiprqo/sos_commands/conntrack/conntrackd_-s_ct
sosreport-mfo-sos-b-2021-01-06-kyiprqo/sos_commands/conntrack/conntrackd_-s_expect
sosreport-mfo-sos-b-2021-01-06-kyiprqo/sos_commands/conntrack/conntrackd_-s_link
sosreport-mfo-sos-b-2021-01-06-kyiprqo/sos_commands/conntrack/conntrackd_-s_network
sosreport-mfo-sos-b-2021-01-06-kyiprqo/sos_commands/conntrack/conntrackd_-s_queue
sosreport-mfo-sos-b-2021-01-06-kyiprqo/sos_commands/conntrack/conntrackd_-s_rsqueue
sosreport-mfo-sos-b-2021-01-06-kyiprqo/sos_commands/conntrack/conntrackd_-s_runtime
sosreport-mfo-sos-b-2021-01-06-kyiprqo/sos_commands/conntrack/ip_netns_exec_ns1_conntrack_-L_-o_extended
sosreport-mfo-sos-b-2021-01-06-kyiprqo/sos_commands/conntrack/ip_netns_exec_ns1_conntrack_-S
sosreport-mfo-sos-b-2021-01-06-kyiprqo/sos_commands/conntrack/ip_netns_exec_ns2_conntrack_-L_-o_extended
sosreport-mfo-sos-b-2021-01-06-kyiprqo/sos_commands/conntrack/ip_netns_exec_ns2_conntrack_-S
sosreport-mfo-sos-b-2021-01-06-kyiprqo/sos_commands/conntrack/ip_netns_exec_ns3_conntrack_-L_-o_extended
sosreport-mfo-sos-b-2021-01-06-kyiprqo/sos_commands/conntrack/ip_netns_exec_ns3_conntrack_-S

** Tags removed: verification-needed-bionic
** Tags added: verification-done-bionic

** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1898077

Title:
  [conntrackd][plugin] add conntrack info

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sosreport/+bug/1898077/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1898077] Re: [conntrackd][plugin] add conntrack info

2021-01-06 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Verification done for focal-proposed.

The conntrack default ns and per-ns files for 'conntrack -L' and
'conntrack -S' are now present.

$ echo "deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu $(lsb_release -cs)-proposed main 
universe" \
| sudo tee /etc/apt/sources.list.d/proposed.list \
&& sudo apt update \
&& sudo apt install -y sosreport conntrack conntrackd

$ sudo ip netns add ns1 && sudo ip netns add ns2 && sudo ip netns add
ns3

$ sudo ip netns
ns3
ns2
ns1

$ lsb_release -cs
focal

$ dpkg -s sosreport | grep Version:
Version: 4.0-1~ubuntu0.20.04.3

$ sudo sosreport --batch

$ sudo tar tf /tmp/sosreport-*.xz | grep sos_commands/conntrack | sort
sosreport-mfo-sos-f-2021-01-06-imeiaft/sos_commands/conntrack/
sosreport-mfo-sos-f-2021-01-06-imeiaft/sos_commands/conntrack/conntrack_-L_-o_extended
sosreport-mfo-sos-f-2021-01-06-imeiaft/sos_commands/conntrack/conntrack_-S
sosreport-mfo-sos-f-2021-01-06-imeiaft/sos_commands/conntrack/conntrackd_-s_cache
sosreport-mfo-sos-f-2021-01-06-imeiaft/sos_commands/conntrack/conntrackd_-s_ct
sosreport-mfo-sos-f-2021-01-06-imeiaft/sos_commands/conntrack/conntrackd_-s_expect
sosreport-mfo-sos-f-2021-01-06-imeiaft/sos_commands/conntrack/conntrackd_-s_link
sosreport-mfo-sos-f-2021-01-06-imeiaft/sos_commands/conntrack/conntrackd_-s_network
sosreport-mfo-sos-f-2021-01-06-imeiaft/sos_commands/conntrack/conntrackd_-s_queue
sosreport-mfo-sos-f-2021-01-06-imeiaft/sos_commands/conntrack/conntrackd_-s_rsqueue
sosreport-mfo-sos-f-2021-01-06-imeiaft/sos_commands/conntrack/conntrackd_-s_runtime
sosreport-mfo-sos-f-2021-01-06-imeiaft/sos_commands/conntrack/ip_netns_exec_ns1_conntrack_-L_-o_extended
sosreport-mfo-sos-f-2021-01-06-imeiaft/sos_commands/conntrack/ip_netns_exec_ns1_conntrack_-S
sosreport-mfo-sos-f-2021-01-06-imeiaft/sos_commands/conntrack/ip_netns_exec_ns2_conntrack_-L_-o_extended
sosreport-mfo-sos-f-2021-01-06-imeiaft/sos_commands/conntrack/ip_netns_exec_ns2_conntrack_-S
sosreport-mfo-sos-f-2021-01-06-imeiaft/sos_commands/conntrack/ip_netns_exec_ns3_conntrack_-L_-o_extended
sosreport-mfo-sos-f-2021-01-06-imeiaft/sos_commands/conntrack/ip_netns_exec_ns3_conntrack_-S

** Tags removed: verification-needed-focal
** Tags added: verification-done-focal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1898077

Title:
  [conntrackd][plugin] add conntrack info

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sosreport/+bug/1898077/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1898077] Re: [conntrackd][plugin] add conntrack info

2021-01-06 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Verification done for groovy-proposed.

The conntrack default ns and per-ns files for 'conntrack -L' and
'conntrack -S' are now present.

$ echo "deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu $(lsb_release -cs)-proposed main 
universe" \
| sudo tee /etc/apt/sources.list.d/proposed.list \
&& sudo apt update \
&& sudo apt install -y sosreport conntrack conntrackd

$ sudo ip netns add ns1 && sudo ip netns add ns2 && sudo ip netns add
ns3

$ sudo ip netns
ns3
ns2
ns1


$ lsb_release -cs
groovy

$ dpkg -s sosreport | grep Version:
Version: 4.0-1ubuntu2.1

$ sudo sosreport --batch

$ sudo tar tf /tmp/sosreport-*.xz | grep sos_commands/conntrack | sort
sosreport-mfo-sos-g-2021-01-06-wkdqtsk/sos_commands/conntrack/
sosreport-mfo-sos-g-2021-01-06-wkdqtsk/sos_commands/conntrack/conntrack_-L_-o_extended
sosreport-mfo-sos-g-2021-01-06-wkdqtsk/sos_commands/conntrack/conntrack_-S
sosreport-mfo-sos-g-2021-01-06-wkdqtsk/sos_commands/conntrack/conntrackd_-s_cache
sosreport-mfo-sos-g-2021-01-06-wkdqtsk/sos_commands/conntrack/conntrackd_-s_ct
sosreport-mfo-sos-g-2021-01-06-wkdqtsk/sos_commands/conntrack/conntrackd_-s_expect
sosreport-mfo-sos-g-2021-01-06-wkdqtsk/sos_commands/conntrack/conntrackd_-s_link
sosreport-mfo-sos-g-2021-01-06-wkdqtsk/sos_commands/conntrack/conntrackd_-s_network
sosreport-mfo-sos-g-2021-01-06-wkdqtsk/sos_commands/conntrack/conntrackd_-s_queue
sosreport-mfo-sos-g-2021-01-06-wkdqtsk/sos_commands/conntrack/conntrackd_-s_rsqueue
sosreport-mfo-sos-g-2021-01-06-wkdqtsk/sos_commands/conntrack/conntrackd_-s_runtime
sosreport-mfo-sos-g-2021-01-06-wkdqtsk/sos_commands/conntrack/ip_netns_exec_ns1_conntrack_-L_-o_extended
sosreport-mfo-sos-g-2021-01-06-wkdqtsk/sos_commands/conntrack/ip_netns_exec_ns1_conntrack_-S
sosreport-mfo-sos-g-2021-01-06-wkdqtsk/sos_commands/conntrack/ip_netns_exec_ns2_conntrack_-L_-o_extended
sosreport-mfo-sos-g-2021-01-06-wkdqtsk/sos_commands/conntrack/ip_netns_exec_ns2_conntrack_-S
sosreport-mfo-sos-g-2021-01-06-wkdqtsk/sos_commands/conntrack/ip_netns_exec_ns3_conntrack_-L_-o_extended
sosreport-mfo-sos-g-2021-01-06-wkdqtsk/sos_commands/conntrack/ip_netns_exec_ns3_conntrack_-S

** Tags removed: verification-needed-groovy
** Tags added: verification-done-groovy

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1898077

Title:
  [conntrackd][plugin] add conntrack info

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sosreport/+bug/1898077/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1901555] Re: [plugin][networking] Include ns ip neigh and ip rule info

2021-01-06 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Verification done for focal-proposed.

The per-ns files for 'ip neigh' and 'ip rule' are now present.

$ echo "deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu $(lsb_release -cs)-proposed main 
universe" \
| sudo tee /etc/apt/sources.list.d/proposed.list \
&& sudo apt update \
&& sudo apt install -y sosreport conntrack conntrackd

$ sudo ip netns add ns1 && sudo ip netns add ns2 && sudo ip netns add
ns3

$ sudo ip netns
ns3
ns2
ns1

$ lsb_release -cs
focal

$ dpkg -s sosreport | grep Version:
Version: 4.0-1~ubuntu0.20.04.3

$ sudo sosreport --batch

$ sudo tar tf /tmp/sosreport-*.xz | grep sos_commands/networking | grep -e 
neigh -e rule | sort
sosreport-mfo-sos-f-2021-01-06-imeiaft/sos_commands/networking/ip_-4_rule
sosreport-mfo-sos-f-2021-01-06-imeiaft/sos_commands/networking/ip_-6_rule
sosreport-mfo-sos-f-2021-01-06-imeiaft/sos_commands/networking/ip_-s_-s_neigh_show
sosreport-mfo-sos-f-2021-01-06-imeiaft/sos_commands/networking/ip_neigh_show_nud_noarp
sosreport-mfo-sos-f-2021-01-06-imeiaft/sos_commands/networking/ip_netns_exec_ns1_ip_-s_-s_neigh_show
sosreport-mfo-sos-f-2021-01-06-imeiaft/sos_commands/networking/ip_netns_exec_ns1_ip_rule_list
sosreport-mfo-sos-f-2021-01-06-imeiaft/sos_commands/networking/ip_netns_exec_ns2_ip_-s_-s_neigh_show
sosreport-mfo-sos-f-2021-01-06-imeiaft/sos_commands/networking/ip_netns_exec_ns2_ip_rule_list
sosreport-mfo-sos-f-2021-01-06-imeiaft/sos_commands/networking/ip_netns_exec_ns3_ip_-s_-s_neigh_show
sosreport-mfo-sos-f-2021-01-06-imeiaft/sos_commands/networking/ip_netns_exec_ns3_ip_rule_list


** Tags removed: verification-needed-focal
** Tags added: verification-done-focal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1901555

Title:
  [plugin][networking] Include ns ip neigh and ip rule info

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sosreport/+bug/1901555/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1901555] Re: [plugin][networking] Include ns ip neigh and ip rule info

2021-01-06 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Verification done for bionic-proposed.

The per-ns files for 'ip neigh' and 'ip rule' are now present.

$ echo "deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu $(lsb_release -cs)-proposed main 
universe" \
| sudo tee /etc/apt/sources.list.d/proposed.list \
&& sudo apt update \
&& sudo apt install -y sosreport conntrack conntrackd

$ sudo ip netns add ns1 && sudo ip netns add ns2 && sudo ip netns add
ns3

$ sudo ip netns
ns3
ns2
ns1

$ lsb_release -cs
bionic

$ dpkg -s sosreport | grep Version:
Version: 3.9.1-1ubuntu0.18.04.3

$ sudo sosreport --batch

$ sudo tar tf /tmp/sosreport-*.xz | grep sos_commands/networking | grep -e 
neigh -e rule | sort
sosreport-mfo-sos-b-2021-01-06-kyiprqo/sos_commands/networking/ip_-4_rule
sosreport-mfo-sos-b-2021-01-06-kyiprqo/sos_commands/networking/ip_-6_rule
sosreport-mfo-sos-b-2021-01-06-kyiprqo/sos_commands/networking/ip_-s_-s_neigh_show
sosreport-mfo-sos-b-2021-01-06-kyiprqo/sos_commands/networking/ip_neigh_show_nud_noarp
sosreport-mfo-sos-b-2021-01-06-kyiprqo/sos_commands/networking/ip_netns_exec_ns1_ip_-s_-s_neigh_show
sosreport-mfo-sos-b-2021-01-06-kyiprqo/sos_commands/networking/ip_netns_exec_ns1_ip_rule_list
sosreport-mfo-sos-b-2021-01-06-kyiprqo/sos_commands/networking/ip_netns_exec_ns2_ip_-s_-s_neigh_show
sosreport-mfo-sos-b-2021-01-06-kyiprqo/sos_commands/networking/ip_netns_exec_ns2_ip_rule_list
sosreport-mfo-sos-b-2021-01-06-kyiprqo/sos_commands/networking/ip_netns_exec_ns3_ip_-s_-s_neigh_show
sosreport-mfo-sos-b-2021-01-06-kyiprqo/sos_commands/networking/ip_netns_exec_ns3_ip_rule_list


** Tags removed: verification-needed-bionic
** Tags added: verification-done-bionic

** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1901555

Title:
  [plugin][networking] Include ns ip neigh and ip rule info

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sosreport/+bug/1901555/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1909043] Re: cannot upgrade mysql server package

2021-01-06 Thread Sergio Durigan Junior
Aside from reinstalling the package, you can try to overwrite your
current apparmor profile with the one that is shipped by default in the
package.  Something like the following:

# wget 
https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-security-proposed/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/+build/20337434/+files/mysql-server-8.0_8.0.22-0ubuntu0.20.04.3_amd64.deb
# dpkg-deb -x mysql-server-8.0_8.0.22-0ubuntu0.20.04.3_amd64.deb mysql
# cp mysql/etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.mysqld /etc/apparmor.d/
# apparmor_parser -r /etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.mysqld

You will need to install the apparmor-utils package in order to get the
"apparmor_parser" program.  Also, bear in mind that this will
*overwrite* your existing /etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.mysqld file!  Make a
backup of it if you want.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909043

Title:
  cannot upgrade mysql server package

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mysql-8.0/+bug/1909043/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1908846] Re: lubuntu focal.2 calamares fails to parse GeoIP results correctly in JSON (refile)

2021-01-06 Thread Walter Lapchynski
It's remotely possible that we might SRU this, so it might end up
appearing in further point release ISOs, but I'm not very much in favor
of it.

Meanwhile, the "fix" will be updated release notes, which is in progress
as we speak.

Going forward, we're going to look into some mechanism to update
Calamares and its settings on launching the installer. This won't keep
us from having to go through the SRU process, but it will mean that we
won't have to respin ISOs to get installer-releated fixes in place.

** Changed in: calamares (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Dan Simmons (kc2bez)

** Changed in: calamares (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => In Progress

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1908846

Title:
  lubuntu focal.2 calamares fails to parse GeoIP results correctly in
  JSON (refile)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/calamares/+bug/1908846/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1902944] Re: Cannot create a swift container, mandatory "Storage Policy" dropdown field is empty

2021-01-06 Thread Corey Bryant
The autopkgtest failure is now resolved, see
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-
swiftclient/+bug/1902944/comments/23

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1902944

Title:
  Cannot create a swift container, mandatory "Storage Policy" dropdown
  field is empty

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1902944/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1878045] Re: doing dist-upgrade got error related do Broadcom

2021-01-06 Thread Rafael Santos
Greetings!

I am using Ubuntu 20.04 on an Acer Aspire TimelineX 4820 and after
updating the packages today, my Broadcom --- stopped working.

I proceeded with the steps described above:
apt purge bcmwl-kernel-source
apt-get install broadcom-sta-source
apt-get install broadcom-sta-dkms
apt-get install broadcom-sta-common

And it got back to work. I have found this thread searching for a
solution, and as this one is about 20.10, I thought that perhaps sharing
that it also happened to a 20.04 installation recently may help.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1878045

Title:
  doing dist-upgrade got error related do Broadcom

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bcmwl/+bug/1878045/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1907445] Re: bcmwl-kernel-source 6.30.223.271+bdcom-0ubuntu5: bcmwl kernel module failed to build

2021-01-06 Thread arm-c
I just ran updates on my laptop... got error message:

Error while applying changes
pk-client-error-quark:  Error while installing package: installed 
bcmwl-kernel-source package post-installation script subprocess returned error 
exit status 10 (313)

I lost all of my wifi card in my MacBook Air.


RECOVERY:  For those like me, recovery can be a challenge.  I didn't see how to 
get back to a older kernel while working through rEFInd boot manager but 
what got me out of this issue was.

- Open Additional drivers (Super Menu, type 'Drivers' and select).
- After scan for "Proprietery Drivers in Use"... switch option to "do not use 
this device" and apply.
- Reboot and hopefully your Wifi is restored.  

I then ran all updates (sudo apt update & sudo apt upgrade).  I went
back to additional drivers and tried reinstalling... got error... but it
appears to have taken... even after reboot.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1907445

Title:
  bcmwl-kernel-source 6.30.223.271+bdcom-0ubuntu5: bcmwl kernel module
  failed to build

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bcmwl/+bug/1907445/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1903632]

2021-01-06 Thread Vstuart-foote
*** Bug 139452 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1903632

Title:
  Touchscreen can't be used to scroll anymore. Instead it will select
  everything on its way.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/1903632/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1909506] Re: lubuntu hirsute daily install failed - error message to large for screen

2021-01-06 Thread Walter Lapchynski
So that is the Desktop Entry that comes with Calamares rather than being
our Ubuntu-specific one. Kind of like the Openbox session that comes
with Openbox, we don't exactly support it. That said, we have
`NotShowIn=LXQt` in it to keep it from showing up, but that's
misbehaving (see linked Calamares bug).

tl;dr only use the Lubuntu one :)

** Changed in: calamares (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Triaged

** Bug watch added: github.com/lxqt/lxqt/issues #1743
   https://github.com/lxqt/lxqt/issues/1743

** Also affects: calamares via
   https://github.com/lxqt/lxqt/issues/1743
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909506

Title:
  lubuntu hirsute daily install failed  - error message to large for
  screen

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/calamares/+bug/1909506/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1698977] Re: ftbfs in artful

2021-01-06 Thread Logan Rosen
** Changed in: apt-btrfs-snapshot (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Logan Rosen (logan)

** Changed in: apt-btrfs-snapshot (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => High

** Changed in: apt-btrfs-snapshot (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => In Progress

** Changed in: apt-btrfs-snapshot (Ubuntu)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1698977

Title:
  ftbfs in artful

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt-btrfs-snapshot/+bug/1698977/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1910462] [NEW] Please remove emelfm2 from Ubuntu

2021-01-06 Thread Logan Rosen
Public bug reported:

Ubuntu-only, unmaintained package that FTBFS on rebuild due to
incompatibility with GCC 10. Also appears to be dead upstream (the
website doesn't work).

** Affects: emelfm2 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1910462

Title:
  Please remove emelfm2 from Ubuntu

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/emelfm2/+bug/1910462/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1910434] [NEW] Better feedback when partitioning during installation and all 4 primary partitions are in use

2021-01-06 Thread Adam
Public bug reported:

 affects ubuntu

During the installation procedure from a Live USB disk, I was installing
Linux on a hard drive with Windows.  During the partitioning step, I chose
"something else" to keep Windows.  Although I had already made extra
unpartitioned space for Linux, it showed this space as "unusable" and
wouldn't let me choose it for installation.  The reason turned out to be
that Windows was already using all 4 primary partitions, which is the
maximum allowed for an MBR partitioning scheme, so I had to delete one.

It would be good for the installer to inform users that this is the reason
the unpartitioned space is unusable, rather than just greying out the
button to create a partition there.  New users might not be able to figure
this out, and might not know about the 4 partition limit.  This issue is
important so that installation is as clear and easy as possible so that
people won't be scared away from switching to Linux.

Technically I was installing Linux Mint, but Mint takes this partitioning
dialog from Ubuntu, so the issue exists for Ubuntu too.

** Affects: ubuntu
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1910434

Title:
  Better feedback when partitioning during installation and all 4
  primary partitions are in use

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1910434/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1910435] [NEW] display texts are gone noting will show

2021-01-06 Thread Нэргүйбаатар
Public bug reported:

no text showing even restart and shutdown button's text

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
Package: xorg 1:7.7+19ubuntu14
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-59.65-generic 5.4.78
Uname: Linux 5.4.0-59-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
.proc.driver.nvidia.capabilities.gpu0: Error: [Errno 21] Is a directory: 
'/proc/driver/nvidia/capabilities/gpu0'
.proc.driver.nvidia.capabilities.mig: Error: [Errno 21] Is a directory: 
'/proc/driver/nvidia/capabilities/mig'
.proc.driver.nvidia.gpus..01.00.0: Error: [Errno 21] Is a directory: 
'/proc/driver/nvidia/gpus/:01:00.0'
.proc.driver.nvidia.registry: Binary: ""
.proc.driver.nvidia.suspend: suspend hibernate resume
.proc.driver.nvidia.suspend_depth: default modeset uvm
.proc.driver.nvidia.version:
 NVRM version: NVIDIA UNIX x86_64 Kernel Module  450.80.02  Wed Sep 23 01:13:39 
UTC 2020
 GCC version:  gcc version 9.3.0 (Ubuntu 9.3.0-17ubuntu1~20.04)
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.14
Architecture: amd64
BootLog: Error: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/var/log/boot.log'
CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
CompositorRunning: None
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Thu Jan  7 02:17:02 2021
DistUpgraded: Fresh install
DistroCodename: focal
DistroVariant: ubuntu
DkmsStatus:
 nvidia, 450.80.02, 5.4.0-42-generic, x86_64: installed
 nvidia, 450.80.02, 5.4.0-58-generic, x86_64: installed (WARNING! Diff between 
built and installed module!) (WARNING! Diff between built and installed 
module!) (WARNING! Diff between built and installed module!)
 nvidia, 450.80.02, 5.4.0-59-generic, x86_64: installed
ExtraDebuggingInterest: Yes
GraphicsCard:
 NVIDIA Corporation GP107 [GeForce GTX 1050 Ti] [10de:1c82] (rev a1) (prog-if 
00 [VGA controller])
   Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. GP107 [GeForce GTX 1050 Ti] [1043:8627]
InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-12-24 (12 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20200731)
Lsusb:
 Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0003 Linux Foundation 3.0 root hub
 Bus 001 Device 004: ID 0d8c:0014 C-Media Electronics, Inc. Audio Adapter 
(Unitek Y-247A)
 Bus 001 Device 003: ID 1038:170a SteelSeries ApS SteelSeries Rival 100 Dell 
China
 Bus 001 Device 002: ID 0c45:672e Microdia USB DEVICE
 Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
MachineType: System manufacturer System Product Name
ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.4.0-59-generic 
root=UUID=15221e3c-7bd7-41a8-b8bc-27f5c93ca2a5 ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7
SourcePackage: xorg
Symptom: display
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
dmi.bios.date: 05/09/2018
dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc.
dmi.bios.version: 3806
dmi.board.asset.tag: Default string
dmi.board.name: H110M-F
dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC.
dmi.board.version: Rev X.0x
dmi.chassis.asset.tag: Default string
dmi.chassis.type: 3
dmi.chassis.vendor: Default string
dmi.chassis.version: Default string
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvr3806:bd05/09/2018:svnSystemmanufacturer:pnSystemProductName:pvrSystemVersion:rvnASUSTeKCOMPUTERINC.:rnH110M-F:rvrRevX.0x:cvnDefaultstring:ct3:cvrDefaultstring:
dmi.product.family: To be filled by O.E.M.
dmi.product.name: System Product Name
dmi.product.sku: SKU
dmi.product.version: System Version
dmi.sys.vendor: System manufacturer
version.compiz: compiz N/A
version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.101-2
version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 20.0.8-0ubuntu1~20.04.1
version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx N/A
version.nvidia-graphics-drivers: nvidia-graphics-drivers-* N/A
version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core 2:1.20.8-2ubuntu2.6
version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev N/A
version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:19.1.0-1
version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 
2:2.99.917+git20200226-1
version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 1:1.0.16-1

** Affects: ubuntu
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug focal ubuntu

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1910435

Title:
  display texts are gone noting will show

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1910435/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1907904] Re: gnome-shell 20.10 crashes with Wayland

2021-01-06 Thread J-Paul BERARD
I have updated GNOME to 3.38.2 today, by enabling "proposed packages" like 
explained in bug 1898910.
I will see if that solves the issue.
Thanks.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1907904

Title:
  gnome-shell 20.10 crashes with Wayland

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1907904/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1908846] Re: lubuntu focal.2 calamares fails to parse GeoIP results correctly in JSON (refile)

2021-01-06 Thread Leó Kolbeinsson
@wxl Walter

Thanks for your comments and further info. I agree with you and the OP
that the issue is MINOR and the user can easily select the correct
location during setup.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1908846

Title:
  lubuntu focal.2 calamares fails to parse GeoIP results correctly in
  JSON (refile)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/calamares/+bug/1908846/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1905519] Re: Object St.Bin (0x565425162c80), has been already deallocated — impossible to set any property on it. This might be caused by the object having been destroyed from C code using someth

2021-01-06 Thread Emmanuel DA MOTA
A fix is available upstream
Can someone make a patch?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1905519

Title:
  Object St.Bin (0x565425162c80), has been already deallocated —
  impossible to set any property on it. This might be caused by the
  object having been destroyed from C code using something such as
  destroy(), dispose(), or remove() vfuncs.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/dash-to-dock/+bug/1905519/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1841037] Re: hardinfo does not detect NVMe drive

2021-01-06 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

** Changed in: hardinfo (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1841037

Title:
  hardinfo does not detect NVMe drive

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/hardinfo/+bug/1841037/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1909698] Please test proposed package

2021-01-06 Thread Steve Langasek
Hello Tw1ce, or anyone else affected,

Accepted tzdata into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tzdata/2020f-
0ubuntu0.20.04 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909698

Title:
  new upstream release 2020f

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tzdata/+bug/1909698/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1878045] Re: doing dist-upgrade got error related do Broadcom

2021-01-06 Thread Rafael Santos
I forgot to paste the model of the Broadcom model, it is BCM43225.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1878045

Title:
  doing dist-upgrade got error related do Broadcom

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bcmwl/+bug/1878045/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1910434] Re: Better feedback when partitioning during installation and all 4 primary partitions are in use

2021-01-06 Thread Ubuntu Foundations Team Bug Bot
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better.  It seems that your bug report is not filed about a
specific source package though, rather it is just filed against Ubuntu
in general.  It is important that bug reports be filed about source
packages so that people interested in the package can find the bugs
about it.  You can find some hints about determining what package your
bug might be about at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/FindRightPackage.
You might also ask for help in the #ubuntu-bugs irc channel on Freenode.

To change the source package that this bug is filed about visit
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1910434/+editstatus and add the
package name in the text box next to the word Package.

[This is an automated message.  I apologize if it reached you
inappropriately; please just reply to this message indicating so.]

** Tags added: bot-comment

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1910434

Title:
  Better feedback when partitioning during installation and all 4
  primary partitions are in use

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1910434/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1909698] Re: new upstream release 2020f

2021-01-06 Thread Steve Langasek
Hello Tw1ce, or anyone else affected,

Accepted tzdata into groovy-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tzdata/2020f-
0ubuntu0.20.10 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
groovy to verification-done-groovy. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-groovy. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

** Changed in: tzdata (Ubuntu Groovy)
   Status: New => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-groovy

** Changed in: tzdata (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: New => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed-focal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909698

Title:
  new upstream release 2020f

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tzdata/+bug/1909698/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1910448] [NEW] 100% CPU-core load for xrdp-chansrv

2021-01-06 Thread BertN45
Public bug reported:

One of the CPU cores is loaded to 100% by xrdp-chansrv

see screenshot

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
Package: xrdp 0.9.12-1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-59.65-generic 5.4.78
Uname: Linux 5.4.0-59-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: zfs zunicode zavl icp zcommon znvpair
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.14
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
CurrentDesktop: GNOME
Date: Wed Jan  6 17:01:51 2021
InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-01-05 (0 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20200731)
SourcePackage: xrdp
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: xrdp (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug focal

** Attachment added: "Screenshot from 2021-01-06 17-05-51.png"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1910448/+attachment/5449829/+files/Screenshot%20from%202021-01-06%2017-05-51.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1910448

Title:
  100% CPU-core load for xrdp-chansrv

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xrdp/+bug/1910448/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1910447] [NEW] PermissionError: [Errno 1] Operation not permitted: '/sys/kernel/debug/tracing/../kprobes/blacklist'

2021-01-06 Thread Bobby B
Public bug reported:

Error caused when running biotop or biosnoop.

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/sbin/biosnoop-bpfcc", line 159, in 
if BPF.get_kprobe_functions(b'blk_start_request'):
  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/bcc/__init__.py", line 539, in 
get_kprobe_functions
with open("%s/../kprobes/blacklist" % TRACEFS, "rb") as blacklist_f:
PermissionError: [Errno 1] Operation not permitted: 
'/sys/kernel/debug/tracing/../kprobes/blacklist'

Fixed by removing the following lines at 539 in /usr/lib/python3/dist-
packages/bcc/__init__.py

@staticmethod
def get_kprobe_functions(event_re):
#with open("%s/../kprobes/blacklist" % TRACEFS, "rb") as blacklist_f:
#blacklist = set([line.rstrip().split()[1] for line in blacklist_f])
fns = []

in_init_section = 0
in_irq_section = 0

** Affects: bpfcc (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1910447

Title:
  PermissionError: [Errno 1] Operation not permitted:
  '/sys/kernel/debug/tracing/../kprobes/blacklist'

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bpfcc/+bug/1910447/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1908761] Re: Can't deploy using root XFS partition using 18.04

2021-01-06 Thread Eric Desrochers
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1652822 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1652822

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1652822
   grub efi doesn't install fs module needed to access root

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1908761

Title:
  Can't deploy using root XFS partition using 18.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/curtin/+bug/1908761/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1910455] [NEW] Thunar and Nautilus USB drive ejecting takes long time

2021-01-06 Thread Marvin
Public bug reported:

Every time i use PNY usb flash drive, when I am trying to eject it, even if i 
did not store anything, it shows message "Writing data to a device, do not 
disconnect". This message freezes the 
window for a half of a minute or so. This issue affects both Thunar and 
Nautilus, on both Ubuntu 20.04 and Ubuntu Studio 20.04. The similar issue is 
documented in the bug #1762595, but the message on the board with that bug 
states that anyone encountering it should file a new bug report.

** Affects: ubuntu
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1910455

Title:
  Thunar and Nautilus USB drive ejecting takes long time

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1910455/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1910453] Re: Touchpad not recognized on Lenovo Laptop

2021-01-06 Thread Ran Mishael
** Description changed:

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1910453

Title:
  Touchpad not recognized on Lenovo Laptop

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-signed-hwe-5.8/+bug/1910453/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1909698] Re: new upstream release 2020f

2021-01-06 Thread Brian Murray
We can see that there is updated information for Volgograd, so setting
to v-done for groovy.

(groovy-amd64)root@impulse:~# apt-cache policy tzdata
tzdata:
  Installed: 2020f-0ubuntu0.20.10
  Candidate: 2020f-0ubuntu0.20.10
  Version table:
 *** 2020f-0ubuntu0.20.10 500
500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu groovy-proposed/main amd64 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
 2020d-1ubuntu1 500
500 http://192.168.10.7/ubuntu groovy-updates/main amd64 Packages
500 http://192.168.10.7/ubuntu groovy-security/main amd64 Packages
 2020b-1ubuntu1 500
500 http://192.168.10.7/ubuntu groovy/main amd64 Packages
(groovy-amd64)root@impulse:~# zdump -v Europe/Volgograd | tail -n 6
Europe/Volgograd  Sat Oct 27 22:59:59 2018 UT = Sun Oct 28 01:59:59 2018 +03 
isdst=0 gmtoff=10800
Europe/Volgograd  Sat Oct 27 23:00:00 2018 UT = Sun Oct 28 03:00:00 2018 +04 
isdst=0 gmtoff=14400
Europe/Volgograd  Sat Dec 26 21:59:59 2020 UT = Sun Dec 27 01:59:59 2020 +04 
isdst=0 gmtoff=14400
Europe/Volgograd  Sat Dec 26 22:00:00 2020 UT = Sun Dec 27 01:00:00 2020 +03 
isdst=0 gmtoff=10800
Europe/Volgograd  9223372036854689407 = NULL
Europe/Volgograd  9223372036854775807 = NULL

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909698

Title:
  new upstream release 2020f

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tzdata/+bug/1909698/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1909698] Re: new upstream release 2020f

2021-01-06 Thread Brian Murray
There is also updated information in Focal for Volgograd.

(focal-amd64)root@impulse:~# zdump -v Europe/Volgograd | tail -n 6
Europe/Volgograd  Sat Oct 27 22:59:59 2018 UT = Sun Oct 28 01:59:59 2018 +03 
isdst=0 gmtoff=10800
Europe/Volgograd  Sat Oct 27 23:00:00 2018 UT = Sun Oct 28 03:00:00 2018 +04 
isdst=0 gmtoff=14400
Europe/Volgograd  Sat Dec 26 21:59:59 2020 UT = Sun Dec 27 01:59:59 2020 +04 
isdst=0 gmtoff=14400
Europe/Volgograd  Sat Dec 26 22:00:00 2020 UT = Sun Dec 27 01:00:00 2020 +03 
isdst=0 gmtoff=10800
Europe/Volgograd  9223372036854689407 = NULL
Europe/Volgograd  9223372036854775807 = NULL
(focal-amd64)root@impulse:~# apt-cache policy tzdata
tzdata:
  Installed: 2020f-0ubuntu0.20.04
  Candidate: 2020f-0ubuntu0.20.04
  Version table:
 *** 2020f-0ubuntu0.20.04 500
500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal-proposed/main amd64 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
 2020d-0ubuntu0.20.04 500
500 http://192.168.10.7/ubuntu focal-updates/main amd64 Packages
500 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal-security/main amd64 Packages
 2019c-3ubuntu1 500
500 http://192.168.10.7/ubuntu focal/main amd64 Packages

And the SystemV timezones are still available.

focal-amd64)root@impulse:~# diff <(zdump -v America/Phoenix | cut -d' ' -f2-) 
<(zdump -v SystemV/MST7 | cut -d' ' -f2-)
nothing to see here

** Tags removed: verification-needed-focal verification-needed-groovy
** Tags added: verification-done-focal verification-done-groovy

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909698

Title:
  new upstream release 2020f

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tzdata/+bug/1909698/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1909698] Re: new upstream release 2020f

2021-01-06 Thread Brian Murray
Verified on bionic:

(bionic-amd64)root@impulse:~# apt-cache policy tzdata
tzdata:
  Installed: 2020f-0ubuntu0.18.04
  Candidate: 2020f-0ubuntu0.18.04
  Version table:
 *** 2020f-0ubuntu0.18.04 500
500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-proposed/main amd64 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
 2020d-0ubuntu0.18.04 500
500 http://ubuntu.osuosl.org/ubuntu bionic-updates/main amd64 Packages
500 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-security/main amd64 
Packages
 2018d-1 500
500 http://ubuntu.osuosl.org/ubuntu bionic/main amd64 Packages
(bionic-amd64)root@impulse:~# zdump -v Europe/Volgograd | tail -n 6
Europe/Volgograd  Sat Oct 27 22:59:59 2018 UT = Sun Oct 28 01:59:59 2018 +03 
isdst=0 gmtoff=10800
Europe/Volgograd  Sat Oct 27 23:00:00 2018 UT = Sun Oct 28 03:00:00 2018 +04 
isdst=0 gmtoff=14400
Europe/Volgograd  Sat Dec 26 21:59:59 2020 UT = Sun Dec 27 01:59:59 2020 +04 
isdst=0 gmtoff=14400
Europe/Volgograd  Sat Dec 26 22:00:00 2020 UT = Sun Dec 27 01:00:00 2020 +03 
isdst=0 gmtoff=10800
Europe/Volgograd  9223372036854689407 = NULL
Europe/Volgograd  9223372036854775807 = NULL

(bionic-amd64)root@impulse:~# diff <(zdump -v America/Phoenix | cut -d' ' -f2-) 
<(zdump -v SystemV/MST7 | cut -d' ' -f2-)
(bionic-amd64)root@impulse:~#

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909698

Title:
  new upstream release 2020f

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tzdata/+bug/1909698/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1909698] Re: new upstream release 2020f

2021-01-06 Thread Brian Murray
And here's a trusty debdiff with a bug reference.

** Patch added: "trusty.debdiff"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tzdata/+bug/1909698/+attachment/5449803/+files/trusty.debdiff

** Patch removed: "trusty.debdiff"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tzdata/+bug/1909698/+attachment/5449801/+files/trusty.debdiff

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909698

Title:
  new upstream release 2020f

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tzdata/+bug/1909698/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1909698] Re: new upstream release 2020f

2021-01-06 Thread Brian Murray
Here's a debdiff for Precise.

** Patch added: "precise.debdiff"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tzdata/+bug/1909698/+attachment/5449825/+files/precise.debdiff

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909698

Title:
  new upstream release 2020f

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tzdata/+bug/1909698/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 1910404] Re: wireguard-dkms 1.0.20201112-1~16.04.1 failed to build

2021-01-06 Thread Marcelo Bello
It is a GA Kernel.

I enabled HWE kernel and it worked .

Em qua, 6 de jan de 2021 15:20, Jason A. Donenfeld <
1910...@bugs.launchpad.net> escreveu:

> > Building initial module for 4.4.0-31-generic
>
> That doesn't look like a recent kernel.
>
> Purge old kernels.
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
> report.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1910404
>
> Title:
>   wireguard-dkms 1.0.20201112-1~16.04.1 failed to build
>
> Status in wireguard-linux-compat package in Ubuntu:
>   Invalid
>
> Bug description:
>   System is fully upgraded. Wireguard went down, i tried reinstalling
>   and got this:
>
>   ===
>   Setting up wireguard-dkms (1.0.20201112-1~16.04.1) ...
>   Loading new wireguard-1.0.20201112 DKMS files...
>   Building only for 4.4.0-31-generic
>   Building initial module for 4.4.0-31-generic
>   Error! Bad return status for module build on kernel: 4.4.0-31-generic
> (x86_64)
>   Consult /var/lib/dkms/wireguard/1.0.20201112/build/make.log for more
> information
>   .
>   root@server:~# cat /var/lib/dkms/wireguard/1.0.20201112/build/make.log
>   DKMS make.log for wireguard-1.0.20201112 for kernel 4.4.0-31-generic
> (x86_64)
>   Qua Jan  6 11:30:22 -03 2021
>   make: Entering directory '/usr/src/linux-headers-4.4.0-31-generic'
> LD  /var/lib/dkms/wireguard/1.0.20201112/build/built-in.o
> CC [M]  /var/lib/dkms/wireguard/1.0.20201112/build/main.o
> CC [M]  /var/lib/dkms/wireguard/1.0.20201112/build/noise.o
> CC [M]  /var/lib/dkms/wireguard/1.0.20201112/build/device.o
> CC [M]  /var/lib/dkms/wireguard/1.0.20201112/build/peer.o
> CC [M]  /var/lib/dkms/wireguard/1.0.20201112/build/timers.o
> CC [M]  /var/lib/dkms/wireguard/1.0.20201112/build/queueing.o
> CC [M]  /var/lib/dkms/wireguard/1.0.20201112/build/send.o
> CC [M]  /var/lib/dkms/wireguard/1.0.20201112/build/receive.o
> CC [M]  /var/lib/dkms/wireguard/1.0.20201112/build/socket.o
>   /var/lib/dkms/wireguard/1.0.20201112/build/socket.c: In function ‘send6’:
>   /var/lib/dkms/wireguard/1.0.20201112/build/socket.c:139:18: error:
> ‘const struct ipv6_stub’ has no member named ‘ipv6_dst_lookup_flow’
>  dst = ipv6_stub->ipv6_dst_lookup_flow(sock_net(sock), sock, ,
> ^
>   scripts/Makefile.build:258: recipe for target
> '/var/lib/dkms/wireguard/1.0.20201112/build/socket.o' failed
>   make[1]: *** [/var/lib/dkms/wireguard/1.0.20201112/build/socket.o] Error
> 1
>   Makefile:1403: recipe for target
> '_module_/var/lib/dkms/wireguard/1.0.20201112/build' failed
>   make: *** [_module_/var/lib/dkms/wireguard/1.0.20201112/build] Error 2
>   make: Leaving directory '/usr/src/linux-headers-4.4.0-31-generic'
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wireguard-linux-compat/+bug/1910404/+subscriptions
>

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1910404

Title:
  wireguard-dkms 1.0.20201112-1~16.04.1 failed to build

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wireguard-linux-compat/+bug/1910404/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1909698] Re: new upstream release 2020f

2021-01-06 Thread Brian Murray
** Changed in: tzdata (Ubuntu Xenial)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Brian Murray (brian-murray)

** Changed in: tzdata (Ubuntu Bionic)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Brian Murray (brian-murray)

** Changed in: tzdata (Ubuntu Focal)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Brian Murray (brian-murray)

** Changed in: tzdata (Ubuntu Groovy)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Brian Murray (brian-murray)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909698

Title:
  new upstream release 2020f

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tzdata/+bug/1909698/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1900935] Re: Support to upgrade Synaptic fingerprint firmware from LVFS

2021-01-06 Thread Mario Limonciello
As per currently agreed SRU policy exception for fwupd:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/firmware-updates focal launched with 1.3.x, so
only the 1_3_X branch should be added into focal archive.

As mentioned there we track the stable branch in Ubuntu, so we shouldn't
be backporting a plugin without associated other changes.  This is very
important as often daemon changes that are not obviously tied to the
plugin may need to backport at the same time.

So the options are either:

1) Get the synaptics fingerprint plugin backported into 1_3_X branch
upstream and a new upstream 1.3.x release tagged.

2) Discuss with technical board to request to modify the exception to
allow moving to the 1.4.x or 1.5.x release stream.  In "general" I'm
supportive of this direction, there are certainly other devices that are
supported in upstream that it would be nice to support in LTS as well.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1900935

Title:
  Support to upgrade Synaptic fingerprint firmware from LVFS

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1900935/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1873918] Re: Fresh install hasn't site-packages directory and this returns a dump

2021-01-06 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package gui-ufw - 20.04.1-1ubuntu1

---
gui-ufw (20.04.1-1ubuntu1) focal; urgency=medium

  * Add upstream hotfix patch avoid-error-dump.diff to avoid an apparmor
false positive error dump (LP: #1873918)

 -- Devid Antonio Filoni   Mon, 20 Apr 2020
19:36:51 +0200

** Changed in: gui-ufw (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1873918

Title:
  Fresh install hasn't site-packages directory and this returns a dump

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gui-ufw/+bug/1873918/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1873918] Update Released

2021-01-06 Thread Brian Murray
The verification of the Stable Release Update for gui-ufw has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report.  In
the event that you encounter a regression using the package from
-updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report
regression-update so we can easily find any regressions.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1873918

Title:
  Fresh install hasn't site-packages directory and this returns a dump

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gui-ufw/+bug/1873918/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1909896] Re: package virtualbox-ext-pack 6.1.14-2 failed to install/upgrade: installed virtualbox-ext-pack package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

2021-01-06 Thread Paulo Flabiano Smorigo
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug.  I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privilege boundaries nor directly cause loss of data/privacy.
Please feel free to report any other bugs you may find.

** Information type changed from Private Security to Public

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909896

Title:
  package virtualbox-ext-pack 6.1.14-2 failed to install/upgrade:
  installed virtualbox-ext-pack package post-installation script
  subprocess returned error exit status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/virtualbox-ext-pack/+bug/1909896/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1910449] Re: package nvidia-dkms-390 390.138-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: nvidia-dkms-390 paketi post-installation betiği kuruldu alt süreci 10 hatalı çıkış kodu ile sona erdi

2021-01-06 Thread Paulo Flabiano Smorigo
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug.  I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privilege boundaries nor directly cause loss of data/privacy.
Please feel free to report any other bugs you may find.

** Information type changed from Private Security to Public

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1910449

Title:
  package nvidia-dkms-390 390.138-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 failed to
  install/upgrade: nvidia-dkms-390 paketi post-installation betiği
  kuruldu alt süreci 10 hatalı çıkış kodu ile sona erdi

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-390/+bug/1910449/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1910295] Re: package nvidia-dkms-390 (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: el subproceso instalado paquete nvidia-dkms-390 script post-installation devolvió el código de salida de error 10

2021-01-06 Thread Paulo Flabiano Smorigo
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug.  I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privilege boundaries nor directly cause loss of data/privacy.
Please feel free to report any other bugs you may find.

** Information type changed from Private Security to Public

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1910295

Title:
  package nvidia-dkms-390 (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: el
  subproceso instalado paquete nvidia-dkms-390 script post-installation
  devolvió el código de salida de error 10

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-390/+bug/1910295/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1909901] Re: PCI/internal sound card not detected

2021-01-06 Thread Paulo Flabiano Smorigo
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug.  I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privilege boundaries nor directly cause loss of data/privacy.
Please feel free to report any other bugs you may find.

** Information type changed from Private Security to Public

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909901

Title:
  PCI/internal sound card not detected

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1909901/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1905623] Re: df: /run/user/1000/doc: Operation not permitted

2021-01-06 Thread Kamil Dudka
Has gnulib upstream been notified about the fix for this bug?

... or about the original treat-devtmpfs-and-squashfs-as-dummy-
filesystems.patch that the fix was applied to?

https://launchpadlibrarian.net/510003931/coreutils_8.32-4ubuntu1_8.32-4ubuntu2.diff.gz

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1905623

Title:
  df: /run/user/1000/doc: Operation not permitted

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/coreutils/+bug/1905623/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1910435] Re: display texts are gone noting will show

2021-01-06 Thread Ubuntu Foundations Team Bug Bot
** Package changed: ubuntu => xorg (Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1910435

Title:
  display texts are gone noting will show

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/1910435/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1901689] Re: Merge steam 1.0.0.67-2 from debian sid to ubuntu hirsute

2021-01-06 Thread AsciiWolf
Thanks for the Steam update! :-)

By the way, Andrew, could you also take a look at this comment about
merging steam-installer into Debian from Simon McVittie and if possible
answer his questions: https://salsa.debian.org/games-
team/steam/-/merge_requests/2#note_209734 ? Thanks!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1901689

Title:
  Merge steam 1.0.0.67-2 from debian sid to ubuntu hirsute

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/steam/+bug/1901689/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1900141] Re: overlay: permission regression in 5.4.0-51.56 due to patches related to CVE-2020-16120

2021-01-06 Thread Seth Forshee
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Focal)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Groovy)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Focal)
   Importance: Undecided => High

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: New => In Progress

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Focal)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Seth Forshee (sforshee)

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Groovy)
   Importance: Undecided => High

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Groovy)
   Status: New => In Progress

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Groovy)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Seth Forshee (sforshee)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1900141

Title:
  overlay: permission regression in 5.4.0-51.56 due to patches related
  to CVE-2020-16120

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1900141/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1750051] Re: cron doesn't support MAILFROM

2021-01-06 Thread Kermina Awad
I also just ran into a case where this would make my life much easier.
Any idea on when we can expect this?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1750051

Title:
  cron doesn't support MAILFROM

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cron/+bug/1750051/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1909698] Re: new upstream release 2020f

2021-01-06 Thread Steve Langasek
Hello Tw1ce, or anyone else affected,

Accepted tzdata into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tzdata/2020f-
0ubuntu0.18.04 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
bionic to verification-done-bionic. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-bionic. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

** Changed in: tzdata (Ubuntu Bionic)
   Status: New => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed-bionic

** Changed in: tzdata (Ubuntu Xenial)
   Status: New => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed-xenial

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909698

Title:
  new upstream release 2020f

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tzdata/+bug/1909698/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1909698] Please test proposed package

2021-01-06 Thread Steve Langasek
Hello Tw1ce, or anyone else affected,

Accepted tzdata into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tzdata/2020f-
0ubuntu0.16.04 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
xenial to verification-done-xenial. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-xenial. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909698

Title:
  new upstream release 2020f

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tzdata/+bug/1909698/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1910401] Re: nvidia-kernel-source-440-server 440.95.01-0ubuntu0.20.04.1: nvidia kernel module failed to build

2021-01-06 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

** Changed in: nvidia-graphics-drivers-440-server (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1910401

Title:
  nvidia-kernel-source-440-server 440.95.01-0ubuntu0.20.04.1: nvidia
  kernel module failed to build

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-440-server/+bug/1910401/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1909043] Re: cannot upgrade mysql server package

2021-01-06 Thread Poldi
Thank you for your detailed and correct instructions.

Updates now complete without errors.

Thanks,
Leo

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909043

Title:
  cannot upgrade mysql server package

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mysql-8.0/+bug/1909043/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1908846] Re: lubuntu focal.2 calamares fails to parse GeoIP results correctly in JSON (refile)

2021-01-06 Thread Walter Lapchynski
So I apologizing for the invalid status on the previous bug. I think it
was a bit premature, although it may be appropriate after all. Let me
explain a bit.

First off, as you can see in the issue, the problem was one specific to the 
GeoIP provider we were using, ipapi.co:
https://github.com/calamares/calamares/issues/1540

You will also see there that as of v3.2.32 of Calamares that there is now 
additional debug information (mentioned in the issue):
https://github.com/calamares/calamares/commit/d63e23b289f1f285d190c711ee296778bb7f5259

Unfortunately, that doesn't exist in versions before Hirsute, so I can't
very well confirm that is the situation in this case, but it is highly
likely.

Additionally, the two changes that resulted in using Ubuntu's GeoIP service 
that are ultimately the fix for this problem weren't added until after Focal:
https://phab.lubuntu.me/rCALASETTINGS01c0bcafc8f3b7c089a7e7d9a6ca2cb4b793e009
https://phab.lubuntu.me/rCALASETTINGS63230172e442ac55db7bc3ba0bd54f842c210edd

tl;dr if we're going to fix this, it would have to be via an SRU of
calamares-settings-lubuntu. The problem is getting it on the ISO. That
is much harder. I guess we could get it in a point release, but is that
worth the effort? I'm kind of thinking not.

** Bug watch added: Calamares Issues #1540
   https://github.com/calamares/calamares/issues/1540

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1908846

Title:
  lubuntu focal.2 calamares fails to parse GeoIP results correctly in
  JSON (refile)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/calamares/+bug/1908846/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1908761] Re: Can't deploy using root XFS partition using 18.04

2021-01-06 Thread Eric Desrochers
Ryan what about adding 'xfs' in grub2 debian/build-efi-images ?

** Changed in: curtin
   Status: New => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1908761

Title:
  Can't deploy using root XFS partition using 18.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/curtin/+bug/1908761/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1908761] Re: Can't deploy using root XFS partition using 18.04

2021-01-06 Thread Eric Desrochers
Thanks Ryan, just got the notifications for your message.

Will check this out.

** Also affects: grub2 (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1908761

Title:
  Can't deploy using root XFS partition using 18.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/curtin/+bug/1908761/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1910445] [NEW] Pyxplot fails when printing $ character

2021-01-06 Thread Reed Dier
Public bug reported:

Previously functional in Xenial on clean install, now broken on Focal
clean install.

Setting a label that includes the dollar sign char $, pyxplot fails with an 
error about a font.
Any text is fine, only when using the $ does it fail.

set label 1 "\$" at 0,0 hal center
^this is the line in question.
If I change to 
set label 1 "anything" at 0,0 hal center
this works fine.

Attaching tmp.plot (referenced below) for reproduction.


Repro steps using multipass on my machine.
First, xenial, working.
$ multipass launch xenial -n pyxplot-x ; multipass shell pyxplot-x
$ sudo apt update ; sudo apt -y dist-upgrade ; sudo apt -y install pyxplot
#I copy the file tmp.plot into home directory.
$ pyxplot -V tmp.plot > test.png ; ls -lh
-rw-rw-r-- 1 ubuntu ubuntu 11K Jan  6 14:46 test.png
-rw-rw-r-- 1 ubuntu ubuntu 237 Jan  6 14:46 tmp.plot

Second, focal, not working.
$ multipass launch focal -n pyxplot-f ; multipass shell pyxplot-f
$ sudo apt update ; sudo apt -y dist-upgrade ; sudo apt -y install pyxplot
#I copy the file tmp.plot into home directory.
$ pyxplot -V tmp.plot > test.png ; ls -lh
file 'tmp.plot':12: Warning: ignoring unhandled DVI special string 
papersize=614.295pt,794.96999pt
file 'tmp.plot':12: Error: dviGetTfm: Cannot find pfa or pfb file for font 
tcss1000
-rw-rw-r-- 1 ubuntu ubuntu0 Jan  6 14:49 test.png
-rw-rw-r-- 1 ubuntu ubuntu  237 Jan  6 14:39 tmp.plot

I have attempted to install further texlive libraries such as texlive-
full, cm-super[-x11]; all to no avail.

$ uname -a ; dpkg -l | grep pyxplot
Linux pyxplot-f 5.4.0-59-generic #65-Ubuntu SMP Thu Dec 10 12:01:51 UTC 2020 
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
ii  pyxplot  0.9.2-11  
amd64data plotting program producing publication-quality output
ii  pyxplot-doc  0.9.2-11  
all  documentation for pyxplot data plotting program

$ uname -a ; dpkg -l | grep pyxplot
Linux pyxplot-x 4.4.0-198-generic #230-Ubuntu SMP Sat Nov 28 01:30:29 UTC 2020 
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
ii  pyxplot   0.9.2-6build1 
 amd64data plotting program producing publication-quality output
ii  pyxplot-doc   0.9.2-6build1 
 all  documentation for pyxplot data plotting program

Hopefully this is enough to help get to the bottom of this.

** Affects: pyxplot (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Attachment added: "pyxplot file for reproduction"
   https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1910445/+attachment/5449828/+files/tmp.plot

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1910445

Title:
  Pyxplot fails when printing $ character

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pyxplot/+bug/1910445/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1910450] [NEW] package linux-image-5.8.0-34-generic 5.8.0-34.37~20.04.2 failed to install/upgrade: installed linux-image-5.8.0-34-generic package post-installation script subprocess returned erro

2021-01-06 Thread Dizaster
Public bug reported:

 --- this happened with a apt upgrade. ive had non stop issues. kmod
signalled bus error. im currently removing the image and trying again

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
Package: linux-image-5.8.0-34-generic 5.8.0-34.37~20.04.2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-58.64-generic 5.4.73
Uname: Linux 5.4.0-58-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.14
AptOrdering:
 smartmontools:amd64: Install
 NULL: ConfigurePending
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
Date: Wed Jan  6 13:05:08 2021
ErrorMessage: installed linux-image-5.8.0-34-generic package post-installation 
script subprocess returned error exit status 135
InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-10-03 (94 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20200731)
Python3Details: /usr/bin/python3.8, Python 3.8.5, python3-minimal, 
3.8.2-0ubuntu2
PythonDetails: N/A
RelatedPackageVersions:
 dpkg 1.19.7ubuntu3
 apt  2.0.2ubuntu0.2
SourcePackage: linux-signed-hwe-5.8
Title: package linux-image-5.8.0-34-generic 5.8.0-34.37~20.04.2 failed to 
install/upgrade: installed linux-image-5.8.0-34-generic package 
post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 135
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: linux-signed-hwe-5.8 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-package focal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1910450

Title:
  package linux-image-5.8.0-34-generic 5.8.0-34.37~20.04.2 failed to
  install/upgrade: installed linux-image-5.8.0-34-generic package post-
  installation script subprocess returned error exit status 135

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-signed-hwe-5.8/+bug/1910450/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1907744] Re: package unattended-upgrades 2.3ubuntu0.1 failed to install/upgrade: installed unattended-upgrades package post-installation script subprocess was killed by signal (Aborted)

2021-01-06 Thread Paulo Flabiano Smorigo
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug.  I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privilege boundaries nor directly cause loss of data/privacy.
Please feel free to report any other bugs you may find.

** Information type changed from Private Security to Public

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1907744

Title:
  package unattended-upgrades 2.3ubuntu0.1 failed to install/upgrade:
  installed unattended-upgrades package post-installation script
  subprocess was killed by signal (Aborted)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unattended-upgrades/+bug/1907744/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1907744] Re: package unattended-upgrades 2.3ubuntu0.1 failed to install/upgrade: installed unattended-upgrades package post-installation script subprocess was killed by signal (Aborted)

2021-01-06 Thread Apport retracing service
** Tags removed: need-duplicate-check

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1907744

Title:
  package unattended-upgrades 2.3ubuntu0.1 failed to install/upgrade:
  installed unattended-upgrades package post-installation script
  subprocess was killed by signal (Aborted)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unattended-upgrades/+bug/1907744/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1906968] Re: install crashed

2021-01-06 Thread Paulo Flabiano Smorigo
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug.  I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privilege boundaries nor directly cause loss of data/privacy.
Please feel free to report any other bugs you may find.

** Information type changed from Private Security to Public

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1906968

Title:
  install crashed

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1906968/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1909338] Re: package virtualbox-guest-dkms 5.2.42-dfsg-0~ubuntu1.18.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: installed virtualbox-guest-dkms package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit

2021-01-06 Thread Paulo Flabiano Smorigo
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug.  I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privilege boundaries nor directly cause loss of data/privacy.
Please feel free to report any other bugs you may find.

** Information type changed from Private Security to Public

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909338

Title:
  package virtualbox-guest-dkms 5.2.42-dfsg-0~ubuntu1.18.04.1 failed to
  install/upgrade: installed virtualbox-guest-dkms package post-
  installation script subprocess returned error exit status 10

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/virtualbox/+bug/1909338/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1909338] Re: package virtualbox-guest-dkms 5.2.42-dfsg-0~ubuntu1.18.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: installed virtualbox-guest-dkms package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit

2021-01-06 Thread Apport retracing service
** Tags removed: need-duplicate-check

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909338

Title:
  package virtualbox-guest-dkms 5.2.42-dfsg-0~ubuntu1.18.04.1 failed to
  install/upgrade: installed virtualbox-guest-dkms package post-
  installation script subprocess returned error exit status 10

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/virtualbox/+bug/1909338/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1908846] Re: lubuntu focal.2 calamares fails to parse GeoIP results correctly in JSON (refile)

2021-01-06 Thread Chris Guiver
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1904974 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1904974

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1904974
   calamares selected wrong timezone

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1908846

Title:
  lubuntu focal.2 calamares fails to parse GeoIP results correctly in
  JSON (refile)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/calamares/+bug/1908846/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1909845] Status changed to Confirmed

2021-01-06 Thread Ubuntu Kernel Bot
This change was made by a bot.

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909845

Title:
  TouchPad Not Working

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1909845/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1909622] Re: lubuntu hirsute install; calamares error

2021-01-06 Thread Walter Lapchynski
So that is the Desktop Entry that comes with Calamares rather than being
our Ubuntu-specific one. Kind of like the Openbox session that comes
with Openbox, we don't exactly support it. That said, we have
`NotShowIn=LXQt` in it to keep it from showing up, but that's
misbehaving (see linked Calamares bug).

tl;dr only use the Lubuntu one :)


** Changed in: calamares (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Triaged

** Bug watch added: github.com/lxqt/lxqt/issues #1743
   https://github.com/lxqt/lxqt/issues/1743

** Also affects: calamares via
   https://github.com/lxqt/lxqt/issues/1743
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909622

Title:
  lubuntu hirsute install; calamares error

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/calamares/+bug/1909622/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1899058] Re: upgrade fails

2021-01-06 Thread Ganesh
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1889250 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1889250

I am also facing the same problem however, i do not see nodejs package
installed in the machine :  Please find the logs below :

  MarkInstall python-is-python2:amd64 < none -> 2.7.17-4 @un uN Ib > FU=1
  Installing python2 as Depends of python-is-python2
MarkInstall python2:amd64 < none -> 2.7.17-2ubuntu4 @un uN Ib > FU=0
Installing python2-minimal as PreDepends of python2
  MarkInstall python2-minimal:amd64 < none -> 2.7.17-2ubuntu4 @un uN Ib > 
FU=0
   Removing: python-minimal
MarkDelete python-minimal:amd64 < 2.7.15~rc1-1 @ii mK > FU=0
Installing libpython2-stdlib as Depends of python2
  MarkInstall libpython2-stdlib:amd64 < none -> 2.7.17-2ubuntu4 @un uN Ib > 
FU=0
   Removing: libpython-stdlib
MarkDelete libpython-stdlib:amd64 < 2.7.15~rc1-1 @ii mK > FU=0
 Removing: python
  MarkDelete python:amd64 < 2.7.15~rc1-1 @ii mK Ib > FU=0
Starting pkgProblemResolver with broken count: 1
Starting 2 pkgProblemResolver with broken count: 1
Investigating (0) python-dev:amd64 < 2.7.15~rc1-1 @ii mK Ib >
Broken python-dev:amd64 Depends on python:amd64 < 2.7.15~rc1-1 @ii gR > (= 
2.7.15~rc1-1)
  Considering python:amd64 11 as a solution to python-dev:amd64 21
  Added python:amd64 to the remove list
  Fixing python-dev:amd64 via keep of python:amd64
  MarkKeep python:amd64 < 2.7.15~rc1-1 @ii gR > FU=0
Investigating (0) python:amd64 < 2.7.15~rc1-1 @ii gK Ib >
Broken python:amd64 PreDepends on python-minimal:amd64 < 2.7.15~rc1-1 @ii gR > 
(= 2.7.15~rc1-1)
  Considering python-minimal:amd64 0 as a solution to python:amd64 11
  Added python-minimal:amd64 to the remove list
Broken python:amd64 Depends on libpython-stdlib:amd64 < 2.7.15~rc1-1 @ii gR > 
(= 2.7.15~rc1-1)
  Considering libpython-stdlib:amd64 0 as a solution to python:amd64 11
  Added libpython-stdlib:amd64 to the remove list
"/var/log/dist-upgrade/apt.log" 3758L, 346185C

 Considering python-minimal:amd64 0 as a solution to python:amd64 11
  Added python-minimal:amd64 to the remove list
Broken python:amd64 Depends on libpython-stdlib:amd64 < 2.7.15~rc1-1 @ii gR > 
(= 2.7.15~rc1-1)
  Considering libpython-stdlib:amd64 0 as a solution to python:amd64 11
  Added libpython-stdlib:amd64 to the remove list
  Fixing python:amd64 via keep of python-minimal:amd64
  MarkKeep python-minimal:amd64 < 2.7.15~rc1-1 @ii gR > FU=0
  Fixing python:amd64 via keep of libpython-stdlib:amd64
  MarkKeep libpython-stdlib:amd64 < 2.7.15~rc1-1 @ii gR > FU=0
Investigating (0) libpython2-stdlib:amd64 < none -> 2.7.17-2ubuntu4 @un umN Ib >
Broken libpython2-stdlib:amd64 Breaks on libpython-stdlib:amd64 < 2.7.15~rc1-1 
@ii gK > (< 2.7.15-2)
  Considering libpython-stdlib:amd64 0 as a solution to libpython2-stdlib:amd64 
1
  Added libpython-stdlib:amd64 to the remove list
  Fixing libpython2-stdlib:amd64 via remove of libpython-stdlib:amd64
  MarkDelete libpython-stdlib:amd64 < 2.7.15~rc1-1 @ii gK > FU=0
Investigating (0) python2:amd64 < none -> 2.7.17-2ubuntu4 @un umN Ib >
Broken python2:amd64 Breaks on python:amd64 < 2.7.15~rc1-1 @ii gK Ib > (< 
2.7.15-2)
  Considering python:amd64 11 as a solution to python2:amd64 1
  MarkKeep python2:amd64 < none -> 2.7.17-2ubuntu4 @un umN Ib > FU=0
  Holding Back python2:amd64 rather than change python:amd64
Investigating (0) python2-minimal:amd64 < none -> 2.7.17-2ubuntu4 @un umN Ib >
Broken python2-minimal:amd64 Breaks on python-minimal:amd64 < 2.7.15~rc1-1 @ii 
gK > (< 2.7.15-2)
  Considering python-minimal:amd64 0 as a solution to python2-minimal:amd64 1
  Added python-minimal:amd64 to the remove list
  Fixing python2-minimal:amd64 via remove of python-minimal:amd64
  MarkDelete python-minimal:amd64 < 2.7.15~rc1-1 @ii gK > FU=0
Investigating (1) python-is-python2:amd64 < none -> 2.7.17-4 @un pumN Ib >
Broken python-is-python2:amd64 Depends on python2:amd64 < none | 
2.7.17-2ubuntu4 @un umH >
  Considering python2:amd64 1 as a solution to python-is-python2:amd64 
  Re-Instated python2:amd64
Broken python-is-python2:amd64 Breaks on python:amd64 < 2.7.15~rc1-1 @ii gK Ib >


Reinst Failed because of python:amd64
  MarkKeep python-opengl:amd64 < 3.1.0+dfsg-1 -> 3.1.0+dfsg-2build1 @ii umU Ib 
> FU=0
  Removing python-opengl:amd64 rather than change python-ctypes:amd64
  MarkDelete python-opengl:amd64 < 3.1.0+dfsg-1 | 3.1.0+dfsg-2build1 @ii umH Ib 
> FU=0
Investigating (2) libc6-dbg:amd64 < 2.27-3ubuntu1.4 | 2.31-0ubuntu9.1 @ii umH 
Ib >
Broken libc6-dbg:amd64 Depends on libc6:amd64 < 2.27-3ubuntu1.4 -> 
2.31-0ubuntu9.1 @ii umU IPb > (= 2.27-3ubuntu1.4)
  Considering libc6:amd64 17228 as a solution to libc6-dbg:amd64 0
  Re-Instated libc6-dbg:amd64
Investigating (2) ros-melodic-image-proc:amd64 < 1.15.0-1bionic.20200530.124945 
@ii mK Ib >
Broken ros-melodic-image-proc:amd64 Depends on 

[Bug 1909030] Re: [pulse bridge] Stuttered Audio Playback after xruns

2021-01-06 Thread Len Ovens
Sorry for the delay, Anyway, the device is able to use 44k1 without problems 
and because VLC works fine we can probably rule out jack, and pulse too. 
Studio-controls is just a script that runs jack and adds bridges to it using 
software that is not a part of studio-controls so it is not studio-controls 
specific. Really, that leaves discord either not liking 44k1 or not being able 
to deal with large buffer sizes. It would be interesting to know what discord 
asks for when it opens the audio device. You can check this by stopping jack in 
studio-controls, make sure vlc is not running, run discord and while discord is 
running run:
cd /tmp && wget https://community.ardour.org/files/adevices.sh && bash 
./adevices.sh >adevices-pulse
Attach adevices-pulse here or look at it yourself. The lines to look at are:
used by: pulse
rate: 44100 (44100/1) - The 44100/1 means it really is 44100 as measured by the 
computer
period_size: 4096 - what we call buffer size, the amount of memory pulse can 
deal with per period
buffer_size: 8192 - buffer size X nperiods, the application deals with one half 
while the device deals with the other and then they switch when the device says 
so (at least in jack) pulse does other things sometimes.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909030

Title:
  [pulse bridge] Stuttered Audio Playback after xruns

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntustudio-controls/+bug/1909030/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1910494] [NEW] virtualbox-dkms 6.1.10-dfsg-1~ubuntu1.20.04.1: virtualbox kernel module failed to build

2021-01-06 Thread DE BIASIO
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1899233 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1899233

Public bug reported:

happened 3 minutes after I logged in

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
Package: virtualbox-dkms 6.1.10-dfsg-1~ubuntu1.20.04.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-59.65-generic 5.4.78
Uname: Linux 5.4.0-59-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.14
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
DKMSKernelVersion: 5.8.0-34-generic
Date: Thu Jan  7 07:13:22 2021
DuplicateSignature: 
dkms:virtualbox-dkms:6.1.10-dfsg-1~ubuntu1.20.04.1:/var/lib/dkms/virtualbox/6.1.10/build/vboxdrv/linux/SUPDrv-linux.c:760:38:
 error: ‘cpu_tlbstate’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 
‘cpuhp_state’?
InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-09-16 (112 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04.0 2020.09.07 LTS am "Custom Focal Fossa" 
(20200907)
PackageVersion: 6.1.10-dfsg-1~ubuntu1.20.04.1
Python3Details: /usr/bin/python3.8, Python 3.8.5, python3-minimal, 
3.8.2-0ubuntu2
PythonDetails: N/A
RelatedPackageVersions:
 dpkg 1.19.7ubuntu3
 apt  2.0.2ubuntu0.2
SourcePackage: virtualbox
Title: virtualbox-dkms 6.1.10-dfsg-1~ubuntu1.20.04.1: virtualbox kernel module 
failed to build
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: virtualbox (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-package focal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1910494

Title:
  virtualbox-dkms 6.1.10-dfsg-1~ubuntu1.20.04.1: virtualbox kernel
  module failed to build

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/virtualbox/+bug/1910494/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1910494] Re: virtualbox-dkms 6.1.10-dfsg-1~ubuntu1.20.04.1: virtualbox kernel module failed to build

2021-01-06 Thread Apport retracing service
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1899233 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1899233

Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make
this software better.  This particular crash has already been reported
and is a duplicate of bug #1899233, so is being marked as such.  Please
look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information
that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug.
Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in
the other report.  Please continue to report any other bugs you may
find.

** Tags removed: need-duplicate-check

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1899233
   post login - no apps launched - virtualbox-dkms 
6.1.10-dfsg-1~ubuntu1.20.04.1: virtualbox kernel module failed to build

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1910494

Title:
  virtualbox-dkms 6.1.10-dfsg-1~ubuntu1.20.04.1: virtualbox kernel
  module failed to build

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/virtualbox/+bug/1910494/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1910496] [NEW] nvidia-dkms-440 440.100-0ubuntu0.20.04.1: nvidia kernel module failed to build

2021-01-06 Thread Vitaliy
Public bug reported:

123

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
Package: nvidia-dkms-440 440.100-0ubuntu0.20.04.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-59.65-generic 5.4.78
Uname: Linux 5.4.0-59-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.12
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
DKMSKernelVersion: 5.8.0-34-generic
Date: Thu Jan  7 09:20:34 2021
DuplicateSignature: 
dkms:nvidia-dkms-440:440.100-0ubuntu0.20.04.1:/var/lib/dkms/nvidia/440.100/build/common/inc/nv-linux.h:512:17:
 error: too many arguments to function ‘__vmalloc’
InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-06-22 (198 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20200423)
PackageVersion: 440.100-0ubuntu0.20.04.1
Python3Details: /usr/bin/python3.8, Python 3.8.5, python3-minimal, 
3.8.2-0ubuntu2
PythonDetails: /usr/bin/python2.7, Python 2.7.18rc1, python-is-python2, 2.7.17-4
RelatedPackageVersions:
 dpkg 1.19.7ubuntu3
 apt  2.0.2ubuntu0.2
SourcePackage: nvidia-graphics-drivers-440
Title: nvidia-dkms-440 440.100-0ubuntu0.20.04.1: nvidia kernel module failed to 
build
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: nvidia-graphics-drivers-440 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-package focal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1910496

Title:
  nvidia-dkms-440 440.100-0ubuntu0.20.04.1: nvidia kernel module failed
  to build

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-440/+bug/1910496/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

  1   2   3   4   5   >