Public bug reported:
sogo 5.9.1-1build1 is built in -proposed but not on armhf. This will
not block migration because armhf binaries are being removed from the
release pocket, but unless addressed will regress armhf availability of
this package in 24.04 LTS.
** Affects: sogo (Ubuntu)
Public bug reported:
stimfit 0.16.0-1.2build3 is built in -proposed but not on armhf. This
will not block migration because armhf binaries are being removed from
the release pocket, but unless addressed will regress armhf availability
of this package in 24.04 LTS.
** Affects: stimfit (Ubuntu)
Public bug reported:
syncmaildir 1.3.0-2build1 is built in -proposed but not on armhf. This
will not block migration because armhf binaries are being removed from
the release pocket, but unless addressed will regress armhf availability
of this package in 24.04 LTS.
** Affects: syncmaildir
Public bug reported:
sonic-visualiser 4.5.2-2build2 is built in -proposed but not on armhf.
This will not block migration because armhf binaries are being removed
from the release pocket, but unless addressed will regress armhf
availability of this package in 24.04 LTS.
** Affects:
Public bug reported:
spek 0.8.5+dfsg-3build2 is built in -proposed but not on armhf. This
will not block migration because armhf binaries are being removed from
the release pocket, but unless addressed will regress armhf availability
of this package in 24.04 LTS.
** Affects: spek (Ubuntu)
Public bug reported:
termrec 0.19-2.1build1 is built in -proposed but not on armhf. This
will not block migration because armhf binaries are being removed from
the release pocket, but unless addressed will regress armhf availability
of this package in 24.04 LTS.
** Affects: termrec (Ubuntu)
Public bug reported:
syrthes 4.3.5+20200129-dfsg1-1build3 is built in -proposed but not on
armhf. This will not block migration because armhf binaries are being
removed from the release pocket, but unless addressed will regress armhf
availability of this package in 24.04 LTS.
** Affects:
Public bug reported:
tlog 14-1build1 is built in -proposed but not on armhf. This will not
block migration because armhf binaries are being removed from the
release pocket, but unless addressed will regress armhf availability of
this package in 24.04 LTS.
** Affects: tlog (Ubuntu)
Public bug reported:
vdeplug-slirp 0.1.0-2build1 is built in -proposed but not on armhf.
This will not block migration because armhf binaries are being removed
from the release pocket, but unless addressed will regress armhf
availability of this package in 24.04 LTS.
** Affects: vdeplug-slirp
Public bug reported:
pidgin-sipe 1.25.0-2.1build1 is built in -proposed but not on armhf.
This will not block migration because armhf binaries are being removed
from the release pocket, but unless addressed will regress armhf
availability of this package in 24.04 LTS.
** Affects: pidgin-sipe
Still same problem with new version from proposed
corrado@corrado-n7-nn-0306:~$ apt policy gnome-snapshot
gnome-snapshot:
Installed: 46.0-1ubuntu1
Candidate: 46.0-1ubuntu1
Version table:
*** 46.0-1ubuntu1 100
100 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu noble-proposed/universe amd64
** Package changed: linux (Ubuntu) => s390-tools (Ubuntu)
** Also affects: ubuntu-z-systems
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Assignee: (unassigned) => Skipper Bug Screeners (skipper-screen-team)
** Changed in: s390-tools (Ubuntu)
Assignee:
Public bug reported:
passwordsafe 1.17.0+dfsg-1build1 is built in -proposed but not on armhf.
This will not block migration because armhf binaries are being removed
from the release pocket, but unless addressed will regress armhf
availability of this package in 24.04 LTS.
** Affects:
Public bug reported:
pacman-package-manager 6.0.2-6 is built in -proposed but not on armhf.
This will not block migration because armhf binaries are being removed
from the release pocket, but unless addressed will regress armhf
availability of this package in 24.04 LTS.
** Affects:
Public bug reported:
pcsxr 1.9.94-5build2 is built in -proposed but not on armhf. This will
not block migration because armhf binaries are being removed from the
release pocket, but unless addressed will regress armhf availability of
this package in 24.04 LTS.
** Affects: pcsxr (Ubuntu)
Public bug reported:
pyxplot 0.9.2-14build2 is built in -proposed but not on armhf. This
will not block migration because armhf binaries are being removed from
the release pocket, but unless addressed will regress armhf availability
of this package in 24.04 LTS.
** Affects: pyxplot (Ubuntu)
Public bug reported:
porg 2:0.10-1.2build1 is built in -proposed but not on armhf. This will
not block migration because armhf binaries are being removed from the
release pocket, but unless addressed will regress armhf availability of
this package in 24.04 LTS.
** Affects: porg (Ubuntu)
Public bug reported:
projecteur 0.10-2build1 is built in -proposed but not on armhf. This
will not block migration because armhf binaries are being removed from
the release pocket, but unless addressed will regress armhf availability
of this package in 24.04 LTS.
** Affects: projecteur (Ubuntu)
Public bug reported:
SRU Justification
Impact:
The upstream process for stable tree updates is quite similar
in scope to the Ubuntu SRU process, e.g., each patch has to
demonstrably fix a bug, and each patch is vetted by upstream
by originating either
Public bug reported:
python-escript 5.6-6build3 is built in -proposed but not on armhf. This
will not block migration because armhf binaries are being removed from
the release pocket, but unless addressed will regress armhf availability
of this package in 24.04 LTS.
** Affects: python-escript
Public bug reported:
quisk 4.2.24-1build2 is built in -proposed but not on armhf. This will
not block migration because armhf binaries are being removed from the
release pocket, but unless addressed will regress armhf availability of
this package in 24.04 LTS.
** Affects: quisk (Ubuntu)
Public bug reported:
rauc 1.11-1build3 is built in -proposed but not on armhf. This will not
block migration because armhf binaries are being removed from the
release pocket, but unless addressed will regress armhf availability of
this package in 24.04 LTS.
** Affects: rauc (Ubuntu)
Public bug reported:
readseq 1-14build1 is built in -proposed but not on armhf. This will
not block migration because armhf binaries are being removed from the
release pocket, but unless addressed will regress armhf availability of
this package in 24.04 LTS.
** Affects: readseq (Ubuntu)
** Changed in: linux-intel-iotg (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2042101
Title:
"intel_ish_ipc :00:1d.0: enable ose_gpe failed"
Public bug reported:
mate-equake-applet 1.3.8.2-1.1build2 is built in -proposed but not on
armhf. This will not block migration because armhf binaries are being
removed from the release pocket, but unless addressed will regress armhf
availability of this package in 24.04 LTS.
** Affects:
Public bug reported:
montage 6.0+dfsg-8build1 is built in -proposed but not on armhf. This
will not block migration because armhf binaries are being removed from
the release pocket, but unless addressed will regress armhf availability
of this package in 24.04 LTS.
** Affects: montage (Ubuntu)
Public bug reported:
matrix-synapse 1.100.0-1ubuntu1 is built in -proposed but not on armhf.
This will not block migration because armhf binaries are being removed
from the release pocket, but unless addressed will regress armhf
availability of this package in 24.04 LTS.
** Affects:
Public bug reported:
mdbtools 1.0.0+dfsg-1.2build1 is built in -proposed but not on armhf.
This will not block migration because armhf binaries are being removed
from the release pocket, but unless addressed will regress armhf
availability of this package in 24.04 LTS.
** Affects: mdbtools
Public bug reported:
netpipe 3.7.2-8.1build1 is built in -proposed but not on armhf. This
will not block migration because armhf binaries are being removed from
the release pocket, but unless addressed will regress armhf availability
of this package in 24.04 LTS.
** Affects: netpipe (Ubuntu)
Public bug reported:
ncl 6.6.2.dfsg.1-4.1build1 is built in -proposed but not on armhf. This
will not block migration because armhf binaries are being removed from
the release pocket, but unless addressed will regress armhf availability
of this package in 24.04 LTS.
** Affects: ncl (Ubuntu)
Public bug reported:
newsboat 2.32-3build1 is built in -proposed but not on armhf. This will
not block migration because armhf binaries are being removed from the
release pocket, but unless addressed will regress armhf availability of
this package in 24.04 LTS.
** Affects: newsboat (Ubuntu)
Public bug reported:
nvidia-settings 510.47.03-0ubuntu2 is built in -proposed but not on
armhf. This will not block migration because armhf binaries are being
removed from the release pocket, but unless addressed will regress armhf
availability of this package in 24.04 LTS.
** Affects:
Public bug reported:
openjdk-8 8u402-ga-2ubuntu6 is built in -proposed but not on armhf.
This will not block migration because armhf binaries are being removed
from the release pocket, but unless addressed will regress armhf
availability of this package in 24.04 LTS.
** Affects: openjdk-8
Public bug reported:
octave-dicom 0.6.0-3 is built in -proposed but not on armhf. This will
not block migration because armhf binaries are being removed from the
release pocket, but unless addressed will regress armhf availability of
this package in 24.04 LTS.
** Affects: octave-dicom (Ubuntu)
Public bug reported:
opencolorio 2.1.3+dfsg-1.1build1 is built in -proposed but not on armhf.
This will not block migration because armhf binaries are being removed
from the release pocket, but unless addressed will regress armhf
availability of this package in 24.04 LTS.
** Affects: opencolorio
Public bug reported:
openjdk-lts 11.0.23~7ea-1ubuntu1 is built in -proposed but not on armhf.
This will not block migration because armhf binaries are being removed
from the release pocket, but unless addressed will regress armhf
availability of this package in 24.04 LTS.
** Affects: openjdk-lts
Public bug reported:
ibus-kkc 1.5.22-4build1 is built in -proposed but not on armhf. This
will not block migration because armhf binaries are being removed from
the release pocket, but unless addressed will regress armhf availability
of this package in 24.04 LTS.
** Affects: ibus-kkc (Ubuntu)
Public bug reported:
iraf-fitsutil 2018.07.06-6build1 is built in -proposed but not on armhf.
This will not block migration because armhf binaries are being removed
from the release pocket, but unless addressed will regress armhf
availability of this package in 24.04 LTS.
** Affects:
Public bug reported:
klatexformula 4.1.0-1build1 is built in -proposed but not on armhf.
This will not block migration because armhf binaries are being removed
from the release pocket, but unless addressed will regress armhf
availability of this package in 24.04 LTS.
** Affects: klatexformula
Public bug reported:
hardinfo 0.5.1+git20180227-2.1build2 is built in -proposed but not on
armhf. This will not block migration because armhf binaries are being
removed from the release pocket, but unless addressed will regress armhf
availability of this package in 24.04 LTS.
** Affects:
Public bug reported:
ifmail 2.14tx8.10-27build1 is built in -proposed but not on armhf. This
will not block migration because armhf binaries are being removed from
the release pocket, but unless addressed will regress armhf availability
of this package in 24.04 LTS.
** Affects: ifmail (Ubuntu)
Public bug reported:
kluppe 0.6.20-1.2build1 is built in -proposed but not on armhf. This
will not block migration because armhf binaries are being removed from
the release pocket, but unless addressed will regress armhf availability
of this package in 24.04 LTS.
** Affects: kluppe (Ubuntu)
Public bug reported:
libgetdata 0.11.0-12build3 is built in -proposed but not on armhf. This
will not block migration because armhf binaries are being removed from
the release pocket, but unless addressed will regress armhf availability
of this package in 24.04 LTS.
** Affects: libgetdata
Public bug reported:
libnginx-mod-http-modsecurity 1.0.3-1build2 is built in -proposed but
not on armhf. This will not block migration because armhf binaries are
being removed from the release pocket, but unless addressed will regress
armhf availability of this package in 24.04 LTS.
** Affects:
Public bug reported:
ktp-common-internals 4:23.04.3-0ubuntu2 is built in -proposed but not on
armhf. This will not block migration because armhf binaries are being
removed from the release pocket, but unless addressed will regress armhf
availability of this package in 24.04 LTS.
** Affects:
Public bug reported:
lnav 0.11.2-1build2 is built in -proposed but not on armhf. This will
not block migration because armhf binaries are being removed from the
release pocket, but unless addressed will regress armhf availability of
this package in 24.04 LTS.
** Affects: lnav (Ubuntu)
Public bug reported:
lua-svn 0.4.0-10build1 is built in -proposed but not on armhf. This
will not block migration because armhf binaries are being removed from
the release pocket, but unless addressed will regress armhf availability
of this package in 24.04 LTS.
** Affects: lua-svn (Ubuntu)
Public bug reported:
massxpert2 8.3.0-1build1 is built in -proposed but not on armhf. This
will not block migration because armhf binaries are being removed from
the release pocket, but unless addressed will regress armhf availability
of this package in 24.04 LTS.
** Affects: massxpert2
Public bug reported:
gxneur 0.20.0-2.2build1 is built in -proposed but not on armhf. This
will not block migration because armhf binaries are being removed from
the release pocket, but unless addressed will regress armhf availability
of this package in 24.04 LTS.
** Affects: gxneur (Ubuntu)
** Description changed:
This bug will contain status and test results related to a kernel source
(or snap) as stated in the title.
For an explanation of the tasks and the associated workflow see:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/kernel-sru-workflow
-- swm properties --
built:
@Paolo thanks for probing this. I finally managed to get my hands on a
suitable power system with recent enough kernel to reproduce this and
file an upstream bug report, and the conversation there led me to
conclude that it's just a faulty assumption in the test (namely that the
initial allocation
Public bug reported:
dcap 2.47.14-1.1build1 is built in -proposed but not on armhf. This
will not block migration because armhf binaries are being removed from
the release pocket, but unless addressed will regress armhf availability
of this package in 24.04 LTS.
** Affects: dcap (Ubuntu)
Public bug reported:
deepin-log-viewer 5.9.7+ds1-2build5 is built in -proposed but not on
armhf. This will not block migration because armhf binaries are being
removed from the release pocket, but unless addressed will regress armhf
availability of this package in 24.04 LTS.
** Affects:
Public bug reported:
eso-midas 23.02pl1.0-1build1 is built in -proposed but not on armhf.
This will not block migration because armhf binaries are being removed
from the release pocket, but unless addressed will regress armhf
availability of this package in 24.04 LTS.
** Affects: eso-midas
Public bug reported:
fcitx5-kkc 5.1.1-1build2 is built in -proposed but not on armhf. This
will not block migration because armhf binaries are being removed from
the release pocket, but unless addressed will regress armhf availability
of this package in 24.04 LTS.
** Affects: fcitx5-kkc
Public bug reported:
fcitx-kkc 0.1.4-3build3 is built in -proposed but not on armhf. This
will not block migration because armhf binaries are being removed from
the release pocket, but unless addressed will regress armhf availability
of this package in 24.04 LTS.
** Affects: fcitx-kkc (Ubuntu)
Public bug reported:
ferret-vis 7.6.0-6ubuntu2 is built in -proposed but not on armhf. This
will not block migration because armhf binaries are being removed from
the release pocket, but unless addressed will regress armhf availability
of this package in 24.04 LTS.
** Affects: ferret-vis
Public bug reported:
ftools-fv 5.5.2+dfsg-2build2 is built in -proposed but not on armhf.
This will not block migration because armhf binaries are being removed
from the release pocket, but unless addressed will regress armhf
availability of this package in 24.04 LTS.
** Affects: ftools-fv
Public bug reported:
flightgear 1:2020.3.18+dfsg-1build3 is built in -proposed but not on
armhf. This will not block migration because armhf binaries are being
removed from the release pocket, but unless addressed will regress armhf
availability of this package in 24.04 LTS.
** Affects:
Public bug reported:
gozer 0.7.nofont.1-7build1 is built in -proposed but not on armhf. This
will not block migration because armhf binaries are being removed from
the release pocket, but unless addressed will regress armhf availability
of this package in 24.04 LTS.
** Affects: gozer (Ubuntu)
Public bug reported:
gri 2.12.27-1.1build1 is built in -proposed but not on armhf. This will
not block migration because armhf binaries are being removed from the
release pocket, but unless addressed will regress armhf availability of
this package in 24.04 LTS.
** Affects: gri (Ubuntu)
Public bug reported:
gsocket 1.4.41-1build1 is built in -proposed but not on armhf. This
will not block migration because armhf binaries are being removed from
the release pocket, but unless addressed will regress armhf availability
of this package in 24.04 LTS.
** Affects: gsocket (Ubuntu)
** Changed in: canonical-signing-jobs/task00
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058357
Title:
noble/linux-oem-6.8: 6.8.0-1001.1 -proposed
** Description changed:
This bug will contain status and test results related to a kernel source
(or snap) as stated in the title.
For an explanation of the tasks and the associated workflow see:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/kernel-sru-workflow
-- swm properties --
built:
Public bug reported:
antimicro 3.1.4-1build1 is built in -proposed but not on armhf. This
will not block migration because armhf binaries are being removed from
the release pocket, but unless addressed will regress armhf availability
of this package in 24.04 LTS.
** Affects: antimicro (Ubuntu)
Public bug reported:
autofs 5.1.9-1ubuntu2 is built in -proposed but not on armhf. This will
not block migration because armhf binaries are being removed from the
release pocket, but unless addressed will regress armhf availability of
this package in 24.04 LTS.
** Affects: autofs (Ubuntu)
Public bug reported:
collectd 5.12.0-17.1build1 is built in -proposed but not on armhf. This
will not block migration because armhf binaries are being removed from
the release pocket, but unless addressed will regress armhf availability
of this package in 24.04 LTS.
** Affects: collectd
Public bug reported:
bppphyview 0.6.1-4build1 is built in -proposed but not on armhf. This
will not block migration because armhf binaries are being removed from
the release pocket, but unless addressed will regress armhf availability
of this package in 24.04 LTS.
** Affects: bppphyview
Public bug reported:
courier 1.0.16-3.2build4 is built in -proposed but not on armhf. This
will not block migration because armhf binaries are being removed from
the release pocket, but unless addressed will regress armhf availability
of this package in 24.04 LTS.
** Affects: courier (Ubuntu)
Public bug reported:
cyrus-imapd 3.8.1-3build3 is built in -proposed but not on armhf. This
will not block migration because armhf binaries are being removed from
the release pocket, but unless addressed will regress armhf availability
of this package in 24.04 LTS.
** Affects: cyrus-imapd
** Description changed:
This bug will contain status and test results related to a kernel source
(or snap) as stated in the title.
For an explanation of the tasks and the associated workflow see:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/kernel-sru-workflow
-- swm properties --
built:
The syslog is a separate issue. I am seeing this, and then the syslog
history files are wiped.
2024-03-17T00:00:02.188526-05:00 jove systemd[1]: rsyslog.service: Sent signal
SIGHUP to main process 2496 (rsyslogd) on client request.
2024-03-17T00:00:02.188713-05:00 jove rsyslogd: [origin
Something is erasing syslog. It was there, and now it is gone.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058838
Title:
Crash
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Version from proposed is ok. thanks
corrado@corrado-n7-nn-0306:~$ apt policy tracker-extract
tracker-extract:
Installed: 3.4.6-3
Candidate: 3.4.6-3
Version table:
3.7.0-1 100
100 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu noble-proposed/main amd64 Packages
--
You received this bug
** Tags added: architecture-s39064 bugnameltc-205913 severity-medium
targetmilestone-inin---
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058742
Title:
libalog and dbusada ftbfs on s390x with
Following up, `Acquire::Retries=0` seems to be avoiding the bug in prod,
which strengthens my suspicion that it's related to retries.
As for the actual bug, when apt is hanging, I notice that the work queue
has items in it, but they have not been delegated to a worker. There is
a condition that
Version from proposed works fine, thanks.
corrado@corrado-n7-nn-0306:~$ apt policy software-properties-gtk
software-properties-gtk:
Installed: 0.99.44
Candidate: 0.99.44
Version table:
*** 0.99.44 100
100 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu noble-proposed/main amd64 Packages
Public bug reported:
Please sync svt-av1 2.0.0+dfsg-1 (universe) from Debian experimental
(main)
Explanation of FeatureFreeze exception:
This release has new features and bug fixes.
Notably, there is this in the upstream changelog:
* Moved to a new versioning scheme where the project major
Ignore the github comment, I was looking at the
https://github.com/canonical/netplan.io repo which I incorrectly assumed
was the repo the package was being built from, I didn't even check the
code there when I didn't see any versioning tags (facepalm).
--
You received this bug notification
Reinaert,
The patch has been uploaded to Noble (future 24.04). Can you come up
with a simple, step-by-step procedure for testing in previous versions
and be willing to do the tests when the SRU team accepts? I have the
feeling these are fairly hardware-specific requirements and not just
anyone
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Focal)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Focal)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Manuel Diewald
** Patch added: "1-23.1.0-1ubuntu2.diff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvmd/+bug/2058958/+attachment/5759338/+files/1-23.1.0-1ubuntu2.diff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Hi Paul,
I think Benjamin led you astray with this comment:
> 4. 0001-utest-autopkgtest.patch is not needed. You can override it
with `make test LIBTRACEEVENT_STATIC="-ltraceevent"`
This variable is *not* override-able without your patch -- it will just
be assigned unconditionally in the
When this occurs, I am see something related to this in syslog.
2024-03-24T11:57:21.284582-05:00 jove kernel: [drm:nv_drm_master_set
[nvidia_drm]] *ERROR* [nvidia-drm]
[GPU ID 0x0100] Failed to grab modeset ownership
2024-03-24T13:17:39.284647-05:00 jove kernel: UBSAN:
Public bug reported:
Various places in the code use `%ld` as a format arg for time_t, this is
incorrect when using 64-bit time_t on 32-bit arches.
** Affects: gvmd (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Thanks. I believe this is fixed by:
https://github.com/net-snmp/net-snmp/pull/785
** Changed in: net-snmp (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Triaged
** Bug watch added: github.com/net-snmp/net-snmp/issues #786
https://github.com/net-snmp/net-snmp/issues/786
--
You received this bug
By reading [1] my understanding is that the consequence of this bug is
logspam: the package remains functional.
[1] https://github.com/net-snmp/net-snmp/issues/786
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: python-pytest-flake8 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: python-flake8 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058914
We (at the Open Robotics Foundation Alliance) are interested in helping
with the transition of python-flake8 from noble-proposed to noble and
have been monitoring the transition for some weeks.
There is an attempt of fixing the code in
https://github.com/tholo/pytest-flake8/pull/96 that we can
Public bug reported:
As found while investigating LP: #2029924, libtimedate-perl is required
at runtime for Date/Parse.pm in genhtml.
** Affects: lcov (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: Confirmed
** Changed in: lcov (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received
Hello,
unfortunately I could not login into the bug system. So I answer with
email. I could only take a look into bug 2048470. No question: this
should be fixed at first.
The LVM option in Lubuntu installer is highly desirable. So my
suggestion would be: yes, add the LVM option to the Lubuntu
Aha! After a little more investigation it appears we're just missing
libtimedate-perl as a runtime dependency (it already has libdatetime-
perl, but libtimedate-perl is required for Date/Parse.pm ... and those
two names aren't *horribly* confusing!). Anyway, that's a trivial change
so I'll patch
Removing packages from noble:
pyxplot 0.9.2-14 in noble
pyxplot 0.9.2-14 in noble amd64
pyxplot 0.9.2-14 in noble arm64
pyxplot 0.9.2-14 in noble armhf
pyxplot 0.9.2-14 in noble ppc64el
pyxplot 0.9.2-14 in
Removing packages from noble-proposed:
rustc-1.68 1.68.2+dfsg0ubuntu1-0ubuntu9 in noble
Comment: LP: #2058955, remove old rust
1 package successfully removed.
** Changed in: rustc-1.68 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
** Changed in: rustc-1.68 (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix
Removing packages from noble:
rustc-1.68 1.68.2+dfsg0ubuntu1-0ubuntu7 in noble
cargo-1.68 1.68.2+dfsg0ubuntu1-0ubuntu7 in noble amd64
cargo-1.68 1.68.2+dfsg0ubuntu1-0ubuntu7 in noble arm64
cargo-1.68 1.68.2+dfsg0ubuntu1-0ubuntu7 in noble
Public bug reported:
remove old rust version
** Affects: rustc-1.68 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058955
Title:
** Description changed:
This bug will contain status and test results related to a kernel source
(or snap) as stated in the title.
For an explanation of the tasks and the associated workflow see:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/kernel-sru-workflow
-- swm properties --
built:
See attached file.
** Attachment added: "journal.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/2058838/+attachment/5759334/+files/journal.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058838
See attached. I found no .crash files that related to this in /var/crash
or . See attached prevjournal.txt file. I'll post journal.txt next.
** Attachment added: "prevjournal.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/2058838/+attachment/5759333/+files/prevjournal.txt
--
You received this
101 - 200 of 371 matches
Mail list logo
