Private bug reported:
I've been trying to run the server certification tools on a server with
DPCMM devices that are configured as: 15% MemoryMode, 85% AppDirect
mode.
I've configured a fsdax, devdax, sector and raw devices on the DCPMMs.
fsdax, devdax and sector are all mountable, formatted
While debugging an unrelated issue with printing to my HP LaserJet 1012,
I switched from the "hpcups" driver to the "hpijs" driver, and I am
**BLOWN AWAY** by the quality of its dithering. After seeing the
difference, I am absolutely appalled at how poorly the "hpcups" driver
dithers grayscales. I
** Summary changed:
- When "Activities" launch, Firefox window will occupy the big square
+ Activities overview doesn't fit the whole window in when shrinking
** Changed in: gnome-shell (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Not the entire Firefox window area is placed in the "Activities".
вт, 2 июл. 2019 г., 4:55 Daniel van Vugt
:
> Can you please explain in more detail what the bug is here?
>
> ** Changed in: gnome-shell (Ubuntu)
>Status: New => Incomplete
>
> --
> You received this bug notification
Performance of Ubuntu 19.04 is some better, but sometimes (according to
increasing of processes) it freezes too. So optimization is need.
пн, 17 июн. 2019 г., 9:50 Daniel van Vugt
:
> Note that not all performance improvements will ever make it into Ubuntu
> 18.04.
>
> If you want higher
This change was made by a bot.
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1833169
Title:
intel_max_cstate is needed with baytrail
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1833169
Title:
intel_max_cstate is needed with baytrail to aviod hangups
To manage
Yes please...
apport-cli --hanging -P PID
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1834984
Title:
gnome-shell freezes with 100% CPU when closing popup window
To manage notifications about
That command gives me "apport-cli: error: -u/--update-bug option cannot
be used together with options for a new report".
Should I omit the -u option and create a new bug?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
[Expired for thunderbird (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for
60 days.]
** Changed in: thunderbird (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
[Expired for firefox (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60
days.]
** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
[Expired for chromium-browser (Ubuntu) because there has been no
activity for 60 days.]
** Changed in: chromium-browser (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
[Expired for totem (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60
days.]
** Changed in: totem (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1339878
[Expired for chromium-browser (Ubuntu) because there has been no
activity for 60 days.]
** Changed in: chromium-browser (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
[Expired for totem (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60
days.]
** Changed in: totem (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1460258
[Expired for firefox (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60
days.]
** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
[Expired for libreoffice (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for
60 days.]
** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
[Expired for libreoffice (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for
60 days.]
** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
[Expired for ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) because there has been no
activity for 60 days.]
** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
[Expired for mysql-5.7 (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for
60 days.]
** Changed in: mysql-5.7 (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
[Expired for linux (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60
days.]
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1827379
[Expired for ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) because there has been no
activity for 60 days.]
** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
[Expired for linux-firmware (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity
for 60 days.]
** Changed in: linux-firmware (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
[Expired for libreoffice (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for
60 days.]
** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
[Expired for ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) because there has been no
activity for 60 days.]
** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
I think is the same bug as:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ntfs-3g/+bug/1779427
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1774855
Title:
Unable to install Ubuntu 18.04 as a secondary
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1779427 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1779427
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: ntfs-3g (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1779427 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1779427
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1779427
NTFS-3g does not support big sector and Windows 10
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
I also receive the same "Unable to find helpers or 'curtin' exe to add
to path" error as Jim K reported in
https://bugs.launchpad.net/curtin/+bug/1820604/comments/18, after
defining a partition layout in the installer. I am installing on a
Lanner FW-8758 using a Rufus-generated USB stick and have
** Changed in: ubuntukylin
Status: Fix Committed => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1831861
Title:
文件管理器默认试图设置无效
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
** Changed in: ubuntukylin
Status: Fix Committed => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1831720
Title:
设置壁纸为黑色,实际显示为渐变色
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
** Summary changed:
- GNOME Shell hangs when closing a dialog in CLion; hung in g_private_get()
from thread_memory_from_self() from g_slice_free_chain_with_offset() from
g_list_free() from stack_do_window_deletions() from stack_ensure_sorted() from
get_default_focus_window()
+ GNOME Shell
Thanks for the bug report. I am fairly confident this will be a
duplicate of bug 1834583, but just to verify please run:
apport-cli --hanging -u 1834984 -P PID
where PID is the process ID of the busy gnome-shell.
** Changed in: gnome-shell (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You
** Changed in: ubuntukylin
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
** Changed in: ubuntukylin-wallpapers (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
** Changed in: ubuntukylin
Status: Fix Committed => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
** Also affects: ukui-panel (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: ukui-panel (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
** Changed in: ubuntukylin
Status: Fix Committed => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Public bug reported:
Whenever I run Netbeans 11 (using either openjdk11) and (eg):
1. Open Tools / Plugins.
2. Go to Settings.
3. Click on 'Add'.
4. Click 'Cancel'.
then gnome-shell freezes (except for the mouse), apparently indefinitely
(I have left it for 30+ minutes.)
I can login as another
** Also affects: oem-priority
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: oem-priority/bionic
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Public bug reported:
Using Brother MFC-9340CDW to scan.
After selecting a region in the Preview window, "Scan" scans the wrong
area. The scanned area is "kind of" related to the selcted area, but
off significantly. The scan includes extra area to the upper left, and
truncates ares from the
STEPS TO REPRODUCE:
1. Install brother MFC-9340CDW :-)
2. Put newsprint or similar on flat bed.
3. Start xsane. In preview window, select +zoom and click somewhere to zoom in.
Then right-click to stop zoom function, and left-click-drag to select a
small scan area (about 1x1 inches)
4.
> it looks like @laney is listed there, which is probably appropriate
(he has admin access to the test systems, while I don't)
My understanding is that @laney can help with the infrastructure where
the tests are run. What usually happens on Ubuntu CI for the most part
has nothing to do with the
** Changed in: oem-priority
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1820768
Title:
[SRU] support new cab and new docking firmware upgrade in fwupd
Expected results is:
HOST and Guest should enable IA32_ARCH_CAPABILITIES MSR.
MDS_NO is bit 5 of ARCH_CAPABILITIES. Expose this bit to guest.
##cpuid -r
0x0007 0x00: eax=0x ebx=0xd19f4fb9 ecx=0x0818 edx=0x8400
edx's 29 bit should be 1.
#rdmsr 0x10a -f 5:5
return value should
You can also try the dkms package, backport-iwlwifi-dkms
https://launchpad.net/~canonical-hwe-team/+archive/ubuntu/pc-oem-dkms
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1809224
Title:
To
** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/regression-testing
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
** Description changed:
This bug will contain status and test results related to a kernel source
(or snap) as stated in the title.
For an explanation of the tasks and the associated workflow
** Tags added: regression-testing-passed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1834528
Title:
linux-ibm-gt: 4.15.0-1026.28 -proposed tracker
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
This bug was fixed in the package anki - 2.1.8+dfsg-1ubuntu1
---
anki (2.1.8+dfsg-1ubuntu1) eoan; urgency=medium
* d/patches/QWebEngineView-import-fix.patch: Apply Arch-originating
patch to aqt/qt.py to use a wildcard import to fetch all web engine
plugins in order to get
This change was made by a bot.
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1834085
Title:
Bluetooth touchpad (Apple Magic Trackpad)
Hi Bryce,
Please see this thread in rabbitmq-server group about my inquiry:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/rabbitmq-users/KW0VdnXMS-U
I haven't had the time to replicate yet what he mentioned here but it
seems that rabbitmqadmin should be enabled using rabbitmq-plugin. I
think we are
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1834085
Title:
Bluetooth touchpad (Apple Magic Trackpad) disconnects every few
minutes
Possibly related:
b'org.gnome.shell' b'enabled-extensions' b"['grava...@jr.rlabs.io',
'mediapla...@patapon.info', 'ubuntu-d...@ubuntu.com',
'appindicatorsupp...@rgcjonas.gmail.com', 'ubuntu-
appindicat...@ubuntu.com', 'mpris22playerindica...@redsoxfan.cz.cc']"
--
You received this bug
Public bug reported:
I've been analyzing an environment that it's issuing too many times
"rndc reload" which eventually leads to the same symptoms seen in bug
1710278 , these are the numbers when the operator attempted to
commission a bit more than 50 machines at the same time.
In regiond.log*
** Changed in: gnome-shell (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
** Summary changed:
- Gnome Shell performance decreases as the number of running apps increases
+ Icon spring animation performs worse and skips frames if there are windows
open
--
You received this bug notification
Can you please explain in more detail what the bug is here?
** Changed in: gnome-shell (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1834967
Title:
When
** Tags added: fixed-in-3.33.4 fixed-upstream
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1831161
Title:
App-switcher icons too small with hidpi monitor and 1.25 scaling
To manage notifications
** Bug watch added: Mozilla Bugzilla #976334
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=976334
** Bug watch added: Mozilla Bugzilla #1428920
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1428920
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/edb57fbc6beac233b12486fa7d7381220339de0f
Bug 440908 - Remove gIsAnyPrefLocked. r=glandium
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/b82802657783b6188e320ba966183ae1eedabf62
Bug 440908 - Add support for `sticky` and `locked`
Comment on attachment 8956311
Bug 440908 - Convert sticky prefs in default pref files to the new syntax.
https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/225186/#review231216
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Comment on attachment 8956310
Bug 440908 - Add support for `sticky` and `locked` attributes to default prefs.
https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/225184/#review231212
::: modules/libpref/Preferences.cpp:3982
(Diff revision 1)
> -Preferences::GetCString(kChannelPref, updateChannelPrefValue,
> -
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/edb57fbc6bea
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/b82802657783
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/d1d9ef8f7c0e
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Created attachment 8956311
Bug 440908 - Convert sticky prefs in default pref files to the new syntax.
Review commit: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/225186/diff/#index_header
See other reviews: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/225186/
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
> clang-format changed its mind, I guess?
No, chutten changed that code in bug 1435753. I generally run `./mach
clang-format -p modules/libpref`. Perhaps I should just run `./mach
clang-format` instead...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Comment on attachment 8956309
Bug 440908 - Remove gIsAnyPrefLocked.
https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/225182/#review231210
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/623844
Title:
lockpref not
Created attachment 8956310
Bug 440908 - Add support for `sticky` and `locked` attributes to default prefs.
Sticky prefs are already specifiable with `sticky_pref`, but this is a more
general attribute mechanism. The ability to specify a locked pref in the data
file is new.
The patch also adds
The syntax is a triviality of the patch. The core problem here is that
there's no one to review the patch so that it possibly lands.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/623844
Title:
(In reply to Mike Hommey [:glandium] from comment #46)
> The preferences code is being heavily refactored, and this needs to wait a
> bit for things to settle first. That being said, I do think the ideal timing
> for this would be to get it into 60. Nick, what do you think?
If things go well with
This bug seems to be stalled
Is there anything I may do to help get it advanced?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/623844
Title:
lockpref not honored in
The ability to lock prefs at the .js level is not *only* for enterprise
customization. Specifically, we have many "prefs" that are meant to
allow e.g. per channel (release, beta, nightly) tweaks but are not meant
for users to change. There are multiple such footguns that would be
avoided by having
I was only referring to the use of user.js for enterprise. I do
understand that it's worthwhile to have locking of prefs in JS file for
Firefox purposes.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Looking forward to see the patch landed as we use it at Fedora.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/623844
Title:
lockpref not honored in /etc/thunderbird/pref/thunderbird.js
To manage
(In reply to Mike Kaply [:mkaply] from comment #30)
> It's not the same syntax, that's my point.
I tend to agree here. I think this could be a useful patch (I'd use it
instead of doing autoconfig stuff) but it's kind of silly to be hung up
on naming...
I do think that "lockPref" sticks out
The preferences code is being heavily refactored, and this needs to wait
a bit for things to settle first. That being said, I do think the ideal
timing for this would be to get it into 60. Nick, what do you think?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
(In reply to Benjamin Smedberg [:bsmedberg] from comment #36)
> Because this came up on the mailing list
Which mailing list is that? (just so I can make sure I'm following the
right one)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
Comment on attachment 8931547
Bug 440908 - Allow preference files to set locked prefs.
https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/202672/#review208008
As per our IRC discussion, I think this is a good feature, and the patch
does a good job of implementing it. But before doing this I'd like to
officially
It's not the same syntax, that's my point.
pref() in a prefs.js file is NOT the same as pref() in an AutoConfig.js
file.
pref() in prefs.js sets the default pref, defaultPref() in an Autoconfig
sets a default pref.
user_pref() in prefs.js sets a user pref, pref() in an AutoConfig file
sets a
@glandium
I see Comment #46 speaks of a FF 60 ESR release; but effort expended to
a continuation '.js' amendments to configurations appears to conflict
with the the '.json' configuration management direction outlined for 60
as well, at:
> https://wiki.mozilla.org/Firefox/EnterprisePolicies
user.js was never intended to be an enterprise level feature for
configuration of Firefox. I don't recommend using it for that.
For enterprise configuration, we have provided Autoconfig since day one,
and we are working on a better solution involving JSON, GPO and possibly
authors.
Our goal is
Created attachment 8931547
Bug 440908 - Allow preference files to set locked prefs.
Review commit: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/202672/diff/#index_header
See other reviews: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/202672/
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Comment on attachment 8613433
Allow .js preference files to set locked prefs with lockPref()
>From b8015e0754742650a4877de9ebe7d6db2671970d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>From: Mike Hommey
>Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 02:48:46 +0200
>Subject: [PATCH] Allow .js preference files to set locked prefs with
>
(In reply to Mike Hommey (VAC: 31 Dec - 11 Jan) [:glandium] from comment #40)
> (In reply to Mike Kaply [:mkaply] from comment #39)
> > Oddly, this document:
> >
> > https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Preferences/
> > A_brief_guide_to_Mozilla_preferences
> >
> > Says we already
Created attachment 8956309
Bug 440908 - Remove gIsAnyPrefLocked.
It optimizes Preferences::IsLocked(), but that function is called fewer than
200 times while starting the browser and opening a range of tabs.
Review commit: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/225182/diff/#index_header
See other
> Looking forward to see the patch landed as we use it at Fedora.
For what purpose? user.js shouldn't be used for anything mission
critical at all.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
(In reply to Benjamin Smedberg [:bsmedberg] from comment #36)
> Comment on attachment 8613433
> Allow .js preference files to set locked prefs with lockPref()
>
> Because this came up on the mailing list, I'll try to be explicit about the
> decision here. I don't think we should allow extensions
Created attachment 8613433
Allow .js preference files to set locked prefs with lockPref()
Refreshed after bug 1098343. Benjamin, would you like to review this,
this time, considering comment 26?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
(In reply to Mike Kaply [:mkaply] from comment #28)
> I really don't want it being called lockPref. That will confuse it with the
> autoconfig "lockPref" function.
What is confusing? It's the same syntax. The only difference aiui, is
the execution environment, which means autoconf can do more
You didn't address my comments.
I really don't want it being called lockPref. That will confuse it with
the autoconfig "lockPref" function.
There is already enough confusion with pref()
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
>From a quick glance at the history of the patch in Debian, in the past 5
years, I had to do actual but trivial code changes twice, and adapt to
context changes twice (one of them having been the change from PRBool to
bool)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
(In reply to Mike Kaply [:mkaply] from comment #39)
> Oddly, this document:
>
> https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Preferences/
> A_brief_guide_to_Mozilla_preferences
>
> Says we already support lockPref in JS files?
It says: "All preferences files may call pref(), user_pref() and
To expound on what :glandium said:
Extensions can lock preferences with:
Components.classes["@mozilla.org/preferences-service;1"]
.getService(Components.interfaces.nsIPrefService)
.getBranch(null)
.lockPref("name_of_pref");
Locking a preference doesn't
Comment on attachment 8613433
Allow .js preference files to set locked prefs with lockPref()
Because this came up on the mailing list, I'll try to be explicit about
the decision here. I don't think we should allow extensions to lock
preferences, and we don't even have a clear description (other
(In reply to Mike Hommey [:glandium] (VAC: 31 Dec - 11 Jan) from comment #32)
> The syntax is a triviality of the patch. The core problem here is that
> there's no one to review the patch so that it possibly lands.
Can I help review?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
:(
Ideally, I'd like to favor this patch over the one I proposed at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=976334 - since it has been
tried and tested for so long...and that just adds another use case for
this: ease of locking preferences for android distributions (which
aren't as
As insane as it seems... Reverting back to EXT4 from BTRFS fixed the
problem...
So for me, it is an issue when BTRFS is used as root partition.
I wasn't even using swap files
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Changed in: libwww-perl (Debian)
Status: Unknown => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1834961
Title:
"Ancient patch causes TLSv1.3 connection deadlock" (fix
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. It seems that your bug report is not filed about a
specific source package though, rather it is just filed against Ubuntu
in general. It is important that bug reports be filed about source
packages so that people
** Changed in: gnome-shell
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1831161
Title:
App-switcher icons too small with hidpi monitor and 1.25 scaling
To
SRU template applied.
** Changed in: anki (Ubuntu Eoan)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
** Description changed:
+ [Impact]
+
+ Due to changes in PyQt (according to Arch), the Anki application fails
+ to run because library imports have been altered in a way that causes
+ the
I did my testing locally in an Eoan and a Disco VM, and this fix does
indeed work.
Further, I dug into the imports, we would need to import a long string
of plugin bits to import each bit individually, so since we're past 3 or
4 imports at that point it makes sense and is easier to just import *
** Changed in: juju/2.6
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1564168
Title:
juju list-credentials --show-secrets does not display passwords
To
** Attachment added: "xfce4-screensaver as floating xfce"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/1834798/+attachment/5274540/+files/software%20updater%20-%20xfce4-screensaver%20as%20floating%20xfce.png
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
This issue isnt limited to just the xubuntu-default-settings, but is
happening with other packages. update-manager is pulling details from
the last .desktop file in the package and show it as though that is a
correct label.
** Attachment added: "exo-utils as file manager"
1 - 100 of 653 matches
Mail list logo