[Bug 1909734] Re: TPM PCR checking will fail if the all characters are 0

2020-12-30 Thread jeremyszu
The result is passed after install the latest fwupd

$sudo snap install fwupd --edge --classic
...
└─System Firmware:
  │ Device ID: c8489035f8df6f87a1a3cd1baff36129262a5ac1
  │ Current version: 1543569408
  │ Minimum Version: 1
  │ Vendor: HP (DMI:HP)
  │ GUIDs: 116180f2-105d-4ab2-809e-7fabed71217b
  │ 230c8b18-8d9b-53ec-838b-6cfc0383493a ← main-system-firmware
  │ d4b3b8bf-ba40-574c-8e55-e7dcb89aff07 ← 
UEFI\RES_{116180F2-105D-4AB2-809E-7FABED71217B}
  │ Device Flags: • Internal device
  │ • Updatable
  │ • System requires external power source
  │ • Needs a reboot after installation
  │ • Cryptographic hash verification is available
  │ • Device is usable for the duration of the update

** Description changed:

+ In some of HP platforms, the TPM PCR checking will fail on focal ubuntu
+ 
  $ fwupdmgr get-devices
  ...
  └─System Firmware:
-   Device ID: c8489035f8df6f87a1a3cd1baff36129262a5ac1
-   Current version: 92.1.0
-   Minimum Version: 0.0.1
-   Vendor: HP (DMI:HP)
-   Update Error: TPM PCR0 differs from reconstruction, please see 
https://github.com/fwupd/fwupd/wiki/TPM-PCR0-differs-from-reconstruction
-   GUID: 116180f2-105d-4ab2-809e-7fabed71217b
-   Device Flags: • Internal device
-• Updatable
-• Requires AC power
-• Needs a reboot after installation
-• Cryptographic hash verification is available
-• Device is usable for the duration of the update
+   Device ID: c8489035f8df6f87a1a3cd1baff36129262a5ac1
+   Current version: 92.1.0
+   Minimum Version: 0.0.1
+   Vendor: HP (DMI:HP)
+   Update Error: TPM PCR0 differs from reconstruction, please see 
https://github.com/fwupd/fwupd/wiki/TPM-PCR0-differs-from-reconstruction
+   GUID: 116180f2-105d-4ab2-809e-7fabed71217b
+   Device Flags: • Internal device
+    • Updatable
+    • Requires AC power
+    • Needs a reboot after installation
+    • Cryptographic hash verification is available
+    • Device is usable for the duration of the update
  
-   Update Error: TPM PCR0 differs from reconstruction, please see
+   Update Error: TPM PCR0 differs from reconstruction, please see
  https://github.com/fwupd/fwupd/wiki/TPM-PCR0-differs-from-reconstruction
  
  ---
  
  This issue is fixed by upstream commit
  
https://github.com/fwupd/fwupd/pull/2394/commits/e265dd1d8687965bee77259ef3482b09b92033c1

** Tags added: oem-priority originate-from-1893018 stella

** Tags added: originate-from-1896855

** Tags added: originate-from-1897674

** Tags added: originate-from-1899914

** Tags added: originate-from-1902835

** Tags added: originate-from-1903660

** Tags added: originate-from-1891966

** Tags added: originate-from-1909539

** Changed in: oem-priority
 Assignee: (unassigned) => jeremyszu (os369510)

** Changed in: oem-priority
   Importance: Undecided => High

** Changed in: oem-priority
   Status: New => Triaged

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909734

Title:
  TPM PCR checking will fail if the all characters are 0

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1909734/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1909734] [NEW] TPM PCR checking will fail if the all characters are 0

2020-12-30 Thread jeremyszu
Public bug reported:

In some of HP platforms, the TPM PCR checking will fail on focal ubuntu

$ fwupdmgr get-devices
...
└─System Firmware:
  Device ID: c8489035f8df6f87a1a3cd1baff36129262a5ac1
  Current version: 92.1.0
  Minimum Version: 0.0.1
  Vendor: HP (DMI:HP)
  Update Error: TPM PCR0 differs from reconstruction, please see 
https://github.com/fwupd/fwupd/wiki/TPM-PCR0-differs-from-reconstruction
  GUID: 116180f2-105d-4ab2-809e-7fabed71217b
  Device Flags: • Internal device
   • Updatable
   • Requires AC power
   • Needs a reboot after installation
   • Cryptographic hash verification is available
   • Device is usable for the duration of the update

  Update Error: TPM PCR0 differs from reconstruction, please see
https://github.com/fwupd/fwupd/wiki/TPM-PCR0-differs-from-reconstruction

---

This issue is fixed by upstream commit
https://github.com/fwupd/fwupd/pull/2394/commits/e265dd1d8687965bee77259ef3482b09b92033c1

** Affects: oem-priority
 Importance: High
 Assignee: jeremyszu (os369510)
 Status: Triaged

** Affects: fwts (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: oem-priority originate-from-1891966 originate-from-1893018 
originate-from-1896855 originate-from-1897674 originate-from-1899914 
originate-from-1902835 originate-from-1903660 originate-from-1909539 stella

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909734

Title:
  TPM PCR checking will fail if the all characters are 0

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1909734/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1898904] Re: Calibre crashes at startup with AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'cancel'

2020-12-30 Thread Norbert
Still happens as per https://askubuntu.com/q/1303977/66509 .

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1898904

Title:
  Calibre crashes at startup with AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has
  no attribute 'cancel'

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/calibre/+bug/1898904/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1901945] Re: Upgraded to Ubuntu 20.10. Can't start Mini SAP server after restarting Virtual machine.

2020-12-30 Thread Francisco Milán
** Package changed: minisapserver (Ubuntu) => ubuntu

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1901945

Title:
  Upgraded to Ubuntu 20.10. Can't start Mini SAP server after restarting
  Virtual machine.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1901945/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1909729] Re: Remaining time while running "sudo apt upgrade"

2020-12-30 Thread Francisco Milán
Hi Chris,

Thanks a lot for your guidance in using the apport tool, I ran the command 
that you provided and now I see some details were automatically added to the 
bug report.
In future bug reports, I'll try to follow your instructions. My apologies for 
not using the apport command before, but this is just the third bug that I've 
reported ever, and I was not familiar with the use of this tool.

Best regards,

Paco Milan.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909729

Title:
  Remaining time while running "sudo apt upgrade"

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1909729/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1909729] ProcEnviron.txt

2020-12-30 Thread Francisco Milan
apport information

** Attachment added: "ProcEnviron.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909729/+attachment/5448203/+files/ProcEnviron.txt

** Description changed:

  Hi there,
  
     After running "sudo apt upgrade" in a Terminal window I noticed that
  the remaining time for 1 minute is displayed as "60s", I think to keep
  consistency this would need to be displayed as "1min 0s" since at some
  point I also saw the remaining time displayed as "5min 0s" (refer to the
  attached images). Going even further I would recommend removing the "0s"
- from the remaining time when applicable, e.g. displaying only "5min"
- instead of "5min 0s", "1min" instead of "1min 0s" and so on.
+ portion from the remaining time when applicable, e.g. displaying only
+ "5min" instead of "5min 0s", "1min" instead of "1min 0s" and so on.
  
  I'm using Ubuntu 20.04 (Focal Fossa).
  
  Best regards,
  
  Paco Milán.
- --- 
+ ---
  ProblemType: Bug
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.12
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-03-06 (299 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 19.10 "Eoan Ermine" - Release amd64 (20191017)
  Package: apt 2.0.2ubuntu0.1
  PackageArchitecture: amd64
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-54.60-generic 5.4.65
  Tags:  focal
  Uname: Linux 5.4.0-54-generic x86_64
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to focal on 2020-05-10 (235 days ago)
  UserGroups: adm cdrom dip lpadmin lxd plugdev sambashare sudo vboxsf
  _MarkForUpload: True

** Description changed:

  Hi there,
  
     After running "sudo apt upgrade" in a Terminal window I noticed that
  the remaining time for 1 minute is displayed as "60s", I think to keep
  consistency this would need to be displayed as "1min 0s" since at some
  point I also saw the remaining time displayed as "5min 0s" (refer to the
  attached images). Going even further I would recommend removing the "0s"
  portion from the remaining time when applicable, e.g. displaying only
- "5min" instead of "5min 0s", "1min" instead of "1min 0s" and so on.
+ "5min" instead of "5min 0s", "1min" instead of "1min 0s", and so on.
  
  I'm using Ubuntu 20.04 (Focal Fossa).
  
  Best regards,
  
  Paco Milán.
  ---
  ProblemType: Bug
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.12
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-03-06 (299 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 19.10 "Eoan Ermine" - Release amd64 (20191017)
  Package: apt 2.0.2ubuntu0.1
  PackageArchitecture: amd64
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-54.60-generic 5.4.65
  Tags:  focal
  Uname: Linux 5.4.0-54-generic x86_64
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to focal on 2020-05-10 (235 days ago)
  UserGroups: adm cdrom dip lpadmin lxd plugdev sambashare sudo vboxsf
  _MarkForUpload: True

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909729

Title:
  Remaining time while running "sudo apt upgrade"

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1909729/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1909729] ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt

2020-12-30 Thread Francisco Milan
apport information

** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909729/+attachment/5448202/+files/ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909729

Title:
  Remaining time while running "sudo apt upgrade"

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1909729/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1909729] Re: Remaining time while running "sudo apt upgrade"

2020-12-30 Thread Francisco Milan
apport information

** Tags added: apport-collected focal

** Description changed:

  Hi there,
  
     After running "sudo apt upgrade" in a Terminal window I noticed that
  the remaining time for 1 minute is displayed as "60s", I think to keep
  consistency this would need to be displayed as "1min 0s" since at some
  point I also saw the remaining time displayed as "5min 0s" (refer to the
  attached images). Going even further I would recommend removing the "0s"
  from the remaining time when applicable, e.g. displaying only "5min"
  instead of "5min 0s", "1min" instead of "1min 0s" and so on.
  
  I'm using Ubuntu 20.04 (Focal Fossa).
  
  Best regards,
  
  Paco Milán.
+ --- 
+ ProblemType: Bug
+ ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.12
+ Architecture: amd64
+ CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
+ CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
+ DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
+ InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-03-06 (299 days ago)
+ InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 19.10 "Eoan Ermine" - Release amd64 (20191017)
+ Package: apt 2.0.2ubuntu0.1
+ PackageArchitecture: amd64
+ ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-54.60-generic 5.4.65
+ Tags:  focal
+ Uname: Linux 5.4.0-54-generic x86_64
+ UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to focal on 2020-05-10 (235 days ago)
+ UserGroups: adm cdrom dip lpadmin lxd plugdev sambashare sudo vboxsf
+ _MarkForUpload: True

** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909729/+attachment/5448201/+files/Dependencies.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909729

Title:
  Remaining time while running "sudo apt upgrade"

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1909729/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1881941] Re: Ubuntu dock behaves crazy when hidden at the bottom of the screen

2020-12-30 Thread sepukkuhero
Actually, not fixed :/

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1881941

Title:
  Ubuntu dock behaves crazy when hidden at the bottom of the screen

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock/+bug/1881941/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1905186] Re: FIXED!!! dock and top bar flashing non-stop at fullscreen

2020-12-30 Thread sepukkuhero
Actually not fixed :(

** Description changed:

  Ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS
- 
- Fixed:
- 
- Jesus Christ. Somehow the "Ubuntu Dock" keeps interacting EVEN OFF and
- conflicting with other dock extensions and even extensions like "Hide
- Top Bar"! I had to uninstall the standard dock from the terminal to
- resolve the following issues:
- 
- -Double dock;
- -Dock flashing / bouncing in fullscreen.
- 
- The problem was completely resolved with the following command:
- 
- -sudo apt remove gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock
- 
- I'm pretty sure that the standard Ubuntu Dock smarthide/intelhide
- continues to interfere with the intelhide of other extensions even after
- it is disabled... It needs to be uninstalled. Something needs to be done
- about this extension.
- 
- 
- -
  
  
  This problem affects all extensions that alter the dock and top bar. 
Including the standard extension "Ubuntu dock". All extensions are duly updated 
to the present date.
  
  I hoped that when entering full screen it would be possible to bring the
  dock and the top bar when placing the mouse over the respective corners.
  And in fact it is partially possible.
  
  However, both are flashing, making it impossible to use them in full
  screen. They blink very fast and you need to click on the correct timing
  to open the programs on the dock, for example. It is possible to click,
  but it is as if they were triggered several times, as if I were placing
  and removing the mouse from the corner very quickly.
  
  I enter the program. Everything is OK. The problem arises when I use the
  fullscreen. Sometimes the docks and the top bar work perfectly for a
  while, and then they start flashing.
  
  -
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: gnome-shell 3.36.4-1ubuntu1~20.04.2
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-54.60-generic 5.4.65
  Uname: Linux 5.4.0-54-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.12
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Sun Nov 22 14:07:57 2020
  DisplayManager: gdm3
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-07-24 (120 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20200423)
  RelatedPackageVersions: mutter-common 3.36.6-1ubuntu0.20.04.2
  SourcePackage: gnome-shell
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to focal on 2020-10-23 (30 days ago)
  mtime.conffile..etc.xdg.autostart.gnome-shell-overrides-migration.desktop: 
2020-07-25T15:59:00.336431
  ---
  ProblemType: Bug
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.12
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  DisplayManager: gdm3
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-07-24 (121 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20200423)
  Package: gnome-shell 3.36.4-1ubuntu1~20.04.2
  PackageArchitecture: amd64
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-54.60-generic 5.4.65
  RelatedPackageVersions: mutter-common 3.36.6-1ubuntu0.20.04.2
  Tags:  focal
  Uname: Linux 5.4.0-54-generic x86_64
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to focal on 2020-10-23 (30 days ago)
  UserGroups: adm cdrom dip lpadmin lxd plugdev sambashare
  _MarkForUpload: True
  mtime.conffile..etc.xdg.autostart.gnome-shell-overrides-migration.desktop: 
2020-07-25T15:59:00.336431

** Summary changed:

- FIXED!!! dock and top bar flashing non-stop at fullscreen
+ dock and top bar flashing non-stop at fullscreen

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1905186

Title:
  dock and top bar flashing non-stop at fullscreen

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock/+bug/1905186/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1909732] ProcEnviron.txt

2020-12-30 Thread Matthew Hudson
apport information

** Attachment added: "ProcEnviron.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909732/+attachment/5448206/+files/ProcEnviron.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909732

Title:
  unable to login to desktop manager after suspend

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdm3/+bug/1909732/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1909732] ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt

2020-12-30 Thread Matthew Hudson
apport information

** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909732/+attachment/5448205/+files/ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909732

Title:
  unable to login to desktop manager after suspend

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdm3/+bug/1909732/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1909732] Dependencies.txt

2020-12-30 Thread Matthew Hudson
apport information

** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909732/+attachment/5448204/+files/Dependencies.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909732

Title:
  unable to login to desktop manager after suspend

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdm3/+bug/1909732/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1909732] [NEW] unable to login to desktop manager after suspend

2020-12-30 Thread Matthew Hudson
Public bug reported:

After my laptop suspends I am unable to login back in again.

I type in my password then  everything freezes - I can drop to a
terminal and run

sudo service gdm restart

this gives me access again to my laptop - though obviously everything I was 
working on has been closed down and potentially lost.
--- 
ProblemType: Bug
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu50.3
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.10
InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-02-16 (318 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 19.10 "Eoan Ermine" - Release amd64 (20191017)
Package: gdm3 3.38.1-2ubuntu1.1
PackageArchitecture: amd64
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.8.0-33.36-generic 5.8.17
Tags:  groovy
Uname: Linux 5.8.0-33-generic x86_64
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to groovy on 2020-11-16 (44 days ago)
UserGroups: adm cdrom dip lpadmin lxd plugdev sambashare sudo
_MarkForUpload: True

** Affects: gdm3 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-collected groovy

** Package changed: kernel-package (Ubuntu) => ubuntu

** Package changed: ubuntu => gdm3 (Ubuntu)

** Tags added: apport-collected groovy

** Description changed:

  After my laptop suspends I am unable to login back in again.
  
  I type in my password then  everything freezes - I can drop to a
  terminal and run
  
  sudo service gdm restart
  
- this gives me access again to my laptop - though obviously everything I
- was working on has been closed down and potentially lost.
+ this gives me access again to my laptop - though obviously everything I was 
working on has been closed down and potentially lost.
+ --- 
+ ProblemType: Bug
+ ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu50.3
+ Architecture: amd64
+ CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
+ CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
+ DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.10
+ InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-02-16 (318 days ago)
+ InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 19.10 "Eoan Ermine" - Release amd64 (20191017)
+ Package: gdm3 3.38.1-2ubuntu1.1
+ PackageArchitecture: amd64
+ ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.8.0-33.36-generic 5.8.17
+ Tags:  groovy
+ Uname: Linux 5.8.0-33-generic x86_64
+ UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to groovy on 2020-11-16 (44 days ago)
+ UserGroups: adm cdrom dip lpadmin lxd plugdev sambashare sudo
+ _MarkForUpload: True

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909732

Title:
  unable to login to desktop manager after suspend

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdm3/+bug/1909732/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1909729] Re: Remaining time while running "sudo apt upgrade"

2020-12-30 Thread Chris Guiver
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. Please execute the following command only once, as it
will automatically gather debugging information, in a terminal:

apport-collect 1909729

When reporting bugs in the future please use apport by using 'ubuntu-
bug' and the name of the package affected. You can learn more about this
functionality at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReportingBugs.

** Package changed: ubuntu => apt (Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909729

Title:
  Remaining time while running "sudo apt upgrade"

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1909729/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1909729] Re: Remaining time while running "sudo apt upgrade"

2020-12-30 Thread Francisco Milan
** Attachment added: "Ubuntu version.jpg"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1909729/+attachment/5448175/+files/Ubuntu%20version.jpg

** Description changed:

  Hi there,
  
-After running "sudo apt upgrade" in a Terminal window I noticed that
- the remaining time for 1 minute is displayed as "60 s", I think to keep
+    After running "sudo apt upgrade" in a Terminal window I noticed that
+ the remaining time for 1 minute is displayed as "60s", I think to keep
  consistency this would need to be displayed as "1m 0s" since at some
  point I also saw the remaining time displayed as "5min 0s" (refer to the
  attached images). Going even further I would recommend removing the "0s"
  from the remaining time when applicable, e.g. displaying only "5min"
  instead of "5min 0s", "1min" instead of "1min 0s" and so on.
  
  I'm using Ubuntu 20.04 (Focal Fossa).
  
  Best regards,
  
  Paco Milán.

** Description changed:

  Hi there,
  
     After running "sudo apt upgrade" in a Terminal window I noticed that
  the remaining time for 1 minute is displayed as "60s", I think to keep
- consistency this would need to be displayed as "1m 0s" since at some
+ consistency this would need to be displayed as "1min 0s" since at some
  point I also saw the remaining time displayed as "5min 0s" (refer to the
  attached images). Going even further I would recommend removing the "0s"
  from the remaining time when applicable, e.g. displaying only "5min"
  instead of "5min 0s", "1min" instead of "1min 0s" and so on.
  
  I'm using Ubuntu 20.04 (Focal Fossa).
  
  Best regards,
  
  Paco Milán.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909729

Title:
  Remaining time while running "sudo apt upgrade"

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1909729/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1909729] Re: Remaining time while running "sudo apt upgrade"

2020-12-30 Thread Francisco Milan
** Attachment added: "5min 0s.jpg"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1909729/+attachment/5448171/+files/5min%200s.jpg

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909729

Title:
  Remaining time while running "sudo apt upgrade"

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1909729/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1909729] Re: Remaining time while running "sudo apt upgrade"

2020-12-30 Thread Francisco Milan
** Attachment added: "60s.jpg"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1909729/+attachment/5448173/+files/60s.jpg

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909729

Title:
  Remaining time while running "sudo apt upgrade"

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1909729/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1909729] [NEW] Remaining time while running "sudo apt upgrade"

2020-12-30 Thread Francisco Milan
Public bug reported:

Hi there,

   After running "sudo apt upgrade" in a Terminal window I noticed that
the remaining time for 1 minute is displayed as "60s", I think to keep
consistency this would need to be displayed as "1min 0s" since at some
point I also saw the remaining time displayed as "5min 0s" (refer to the
attached images). Going even further I would recommend removing the "0s"
from the remaining time when applicable, e.g. displaying only "5min"
instead of "5min 0s", "1min" instead of "1min 0s" and so on.

I'm using Ubuntu 20.04 (Focal Fossa).

Best regards,

Paco Milán.

** Affects: apt (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909729

Title:
  Remaining time while running "sudo apt upgrade"

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1909729/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1909687] Re: Cannot compile kernel using procedure at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/BuildYourOwnKernel

2020-12-30 Thread Mark Allyn

I have decided to make another attempt at doing the build. Here is
the command and result of the git clone:

maallyn@li1004-144:~$ git clone git://kernel.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ubuntu-bionic.git
Cloning into 'ubuntu-bionic'...
remote: Counting objects: 7717929, done.
remote: Compressing objects: 100% (1127512/1127512), done.
Receiving objects: 100% (7717929/7717929), 1.70 GiB | 18.47 MiB/s, done.
remote: Total 7717929 (delta 6543888), reused 7715758 (delta 6541783)
Resolving deltas: 100% (6543888/6543888), done.
Checking out files: 100% (63373/63373), done.

This appears to have executed okay with no errors.

The resultding local directory is ubuntu-bionic. This is owned
by me as a regular user. I executed the git clone as myself,
not root.

I also checked to make sure that the machine has enough free
disk space

maallyn@li1004-144:~/ubuntu-bionic$ df -k .
Filesystem 1K-blocksUsed Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda   329820620 7681400 305371960   3% /

Following instructions for kernel configuration (I plan to conigure only amd64
targets

chmod a+x debian/rules
chmod a+x debian/scripts/*
chmod a+x debian/scripts/misc/*
LANG=C fakeroot debian/rules clean

All seem okay

Now doing configs:

Do you want to edit config: amd64/config.flavour.generic? [Y/n]  I say yes
Do you want to edit config: amd64/config.flavour.lowlatency? [Y/n]  I say yes

For both of those, the only change I make is to remove the noveau NVIDIA
driver as I plan to use the propriatary NVIDIA drivers.

All other architecture, I answer no.

LANG=C fakeroot debian/rules clean

At this point, I do a tar of the clean source directory and
save the result so that you can pull the tar file and see what
I have prior to starting the build

I have created new web site for results:

The tar file is at testing.allyn.com/bionic.tar.bz2

=
This is typical of the output of the vmstat command; showing that
there is no shortage of memory or cpu resources.

10  0  0 7864448 180624 774996400 0  2596 13312 27719 73 17 10  
0  0
 7  0  0 7891128 180624 775388400 0  2996 23490 46709 67 14 20  
0  0
 5  0  0 7879720 180628 775951600 0  2800 19255 38487 76 14 11  
0  0
10  0  0 7963952 180636 776774400 0  2560 17455 36468 76 13 11  
0  0
procs ---memory-- ---swap-- -io -system-- --cpu-
 r  b   swpd   free   buff  cache   si   sobibo   in   cs us sy id wa st
10  0  0 7934168 180636 777066400 0  4352 14918 28456 81 11  8  
0  0
 8  0  0 8133776 180640 777514800 0  3648 22041 45351 66 15 19  
0  0
11  0  0 7921644 180640 777685200 0  1532 17850 35453 70 12 18  
0  0
 7  0  0 7864824 180644 777971200 0  3412 24265 48031 66 15 19  
0  0
11  0  0 7960116 180648 778364800 0  2788 25437 49499 70 14 16  
0  0
 8  0  0 8092108 180664 778704400 0  5496 20968 39922 74 13 13  
0  0
 8  0  0 7824748 180672 778948400 0  2424 19235 37107 73 13 14  
0  0
 8  0  0 8019460 180672 779309200 0  2620 19162 37465 75 13 13  
0  0
11  0  0 8031848 180680 780778800 0  2164 20175 40167 71 16 14  
0  0
 8  0  0 7848844 180684 781095200 0  2412 20743 40815 72 13 15  
0  0
 8  0  0 7790564 180696 781805600 0 34888 21512 42363 72 14 14  
0  0
13  0  0 7842920 180696 782136000 0  2072 22679 44473 72 13 15  
0  0
 7  0  0 7880812 180708 782448400 0  2876 18095 34736 77 12 10  
0  0
 9  0  0 7885716 180720 782793200 4  2396 22771 44153 69 13 18  
0  0
11  0  0 7948224 180720 783129200 0  2148 19393 39164 69 13 18  
0  0
 7  0  0 7982632 180728 783410000 0  5548 22850 45862 68 14 18  
0  0
 9  0  0 8038948 180728 783753200 0  2480 20843 42140 70 15 15  
0  0
 8  0  0 7812604 180736 784054400 0  2192 19992 39908 69 13 18  
0  0
 8  0  0 8026276 180740 784560000 0  3100 22430 45912 69 14 17  
0  0
 9  0  0 7942404 180752 784884000 0  1664 15072 33452 76 11 12  
0  0
 3  0  0 7924660 180760 785162400 0 14432 21655 42980 67 13 20  
0  0
 9  0  0 7969044 180764 785557200 0  2412 21355 42584 72 13 15  
0  0

==


Note that I get the same error:

Debug: module-check-generic
II: Checking modules for generic...
   reading new modules...read 5167 modules.
   reading old modules...
  MISS: nouveau
  read 5168 modules : new(0)  missing(1)
EE: Missing modules (start begging for mercy)
make: *** [module-check-generic] Error 1
debian/rules.d/4-checks.mk:9: recipe for target 'module-check-generic' failed



[Bug 1905186] Re: dock and top bar flashing non-stop at fullscreen

2020-12-30 Thread sepukkuhero
Jesus Christ. Somehow the "Ubuntu Dock" keeps interacting EVEN OFF and
conflicting with other dock extensions and even extensions like "Hide
Top Bar"! I had to uninstall the standard dock from the terminal to
resolve the following issues:

-Double dock; 
-Dock flashing / bouncing in fullscreen.

The problem was completely resolved with the following command:

-sudo apt remove gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock

I'm pretty sure that the standard Ubuntu Dock smarthide/intelhide
continues to interfere with the intelhide of other extensions even after
it is disabled... It needs to be uninstalled. Something needs to be done
about this extension.

** Changed in: gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1905186

Title:
  FIXED!!! dock and top bar flashing non-stop at fullscreen

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock/+bug/1905186/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1881941] Re: Ubuntu dock behaves crazy when hidden at the bottom of the screen

2020-12-30 Thread sepukkuhero
Fixed:

Jesus Christ. Somehow the "Ubuntu Dock" keeps interacting EVEN OFF and
conflicting with other dock extensions and even extensions like "Hide
Top Bar"! I had to uninstall the standard dock from the terminal to
resolve the following issues:

-Double dock;
-Dock flashing / bouncing in fullscreen.

The problem was completely resolved with the following command:

-sudo apt remove gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock

I'm pretty sure that the standard Ubuntu Dock smarthide/intelhide
continues to interfere with the intelhide of other extensions even after
it is disabled... It needs to be uninstalled. Something needs to be done
about this extension.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1881941

Title:
  Ubuntu dock behaves crazy when hidden at the bottom of the screen

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock/+bug/1881941/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1905186] Re: dock and top bar flashing non-stop at fullscreen

2020-12-30 Thread sepukkuhero
Jesus Christ. Somehow the "Ubuntu Dock" keeps interacting EVEN OFF and
conflicting with other dock extensions and even extensions like "Hide
Top Bar"! I had to uninstall the standard dock from the terminal to
resolve the following issues:

-Double dock; 
-Dock flashing / bouncing in fullscreen.

The problem was completely resolved with the following command:

-sudo apt remove gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock

I'm pretty sure that the standard Ubuntu Dock smarthide/intelhide
continues to interfere with the intelhide of other extensions even after
it is disabled... It needs to be uninstalled. Something needs to be done
about this extension.

** Changed in: gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock (Ubuntu)
   Status: Fix Committed => New

** Summary changed:

- dock and top bar flashing non-stop at fullscreen
+ FIXED!!! dock and top bar flashing non-stop at fullscreen

** Description changed:

  Ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS
  
  This problem affects all extensions that alter the dock and top bar.
  Including the standard extension "Ubuntu dock". All extensions are duly
  updated to the present date.
  
  I hoped that when entering full screen it would be possible to bring the
  dock and the top bar when placing the mouse over the respective corners.
  And in fact it is partially possible.
  
  However, both are flashing, making it impossible to use them in full
  screen. They blink very fast and you need to click on the correct timing
  to open the programs on the dock, for example. It is possible to click,
  but it is as if they were triggered several times, as if I were placing
  and removing the mouse from the corner very quickly.
  
  I enter the program. Everything is OK. The problem arises when I use the
  fullscreen. Sometimes the docks and the top bar work perfectly for a
  while, and then they start flashing.
  
+ Fixed:
+ 
+ Jesus Christ. Somehow the "Ubuntu Dock" keeps interacting EVEN OFF and
+ conflicting with other dock extensions and even extensions like "Hide
+ Top Bar"! I had to uninstall the standard dock from the terminal to
+ resolve the following issues:
+ 
+ -Double dock; 
+ -Dock flashing / bouncing in fullscreen.
+ 
+ The problem was completely resolved with the following command:
+ 
+ -sudo apt remove gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock
+ 
+ I'm pretty sure that the standard Ubuntu Dock smarthide/intelhide
+ continues to interfere with the intelhide of other extensions even after
+ it is disabled... It needs to be uninstalled. Something needs to be done
+ about this extension.
+ 
+ 
+ 
+ 
+ -
+ 
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: gnome-shell 3.36.4-1ubuntu1~20.04.2
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-54.60-generic 5.4.65
  Uname: Linux 5.4.0-54-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.12
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Sun Nov 22 14:07:57 2020
  DisplayManager: gdm3
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-07-24 (120 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20200423)
  RelatedPackageVersions: mutter-common 3.36.6-1ubuntu0.20.04.2
  SourcePackage: gnome-shell
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to focal on 2020-10-23 (30 days ago)
  mtime.conffile..etc.xdg.autostart.gnome-shell-overrides-migration.desktop: 
2020-07-25T15:59:00.336431
- --- 
+ ---
  ProblemType: Bug
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.12
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  DisplayManager: gdm3
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-07-24 (121 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20200423)
  Package: gnome-shell 3.36.4-1ubuntu1~20.04.2
  PackageArchitecture: amd64
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-54.60-generic 5.4.65
  RelatedPackageVersions: mutter-common 3.36.6-1ubuntu0.20.04.2
  Tags:  focal
  Uname: Linux 5.4.0-54-generic x86_64
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to focal on 2020-10-23 (30 days ago)
  UserGroups: adm cdrom dip lpadmin lxd plugdev sambashare
  _MarkForUpload: True
  mtime.conffile..etc.xdg.autostart.gnome-shell-overrides-migration.desktop: 
2020-07-25T15:59:00.336431

** Description changed:

  Ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS
  
- This problem affects all extensions that alter the dock and top bar.
- Including the standard extension "Ubuntu dock". All extensions are duly
- updated to the present date.
+ Fixed:
+ 
+ Jesus Christ. Somehow the "Ubuntu Dock" keeps interacting EVEN OFF and
+ conflicting with other dock extensions and even extensions like "Hide
+ Top Bar"! I had to uninstall the standard dock from the terminal to
+ resolve the following issues:
+ 
+ -Double dock;
+ -Dock flashing / bouncing in fullscreen.
+ 
+ The problem was completely resolved with the following command:
+ 
+ -sudo apt remove gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock
+ 
+ I'm pretty sure that the standard Ubuntu Dock smarthide/intelhide
+ continues to interfere with the intelhide of other extensions even after
+ 

[Bug 1881941] Re: Ubuntu dock behaves crazy when hidden at the bottom of the screen

2020-12-30 Thread sepukkuhero
Jesus Christ. Somehow the "Ubuntu Dock" keeps interacting EVEN OFF and
conflicting with other dock extensions and even extensions like "Hide
Top Bar"! I had to uninstall the standard dock from the terminal to
resolve the following issues:

-Double dock; 
-Dock flashing / bouncing in fullscreen.

The problem was completely resolved with the following command:

-sudo apt remove gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock

I'm pretty sure that the standard Ubuntu Dock smarthide/intelhide
continues to interfere with the intelhide of other extensions even after
it is disabled... It needs to be uninstalled. Something needs to be done
about this extension.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1881941

Title:
  Ubuntu dock behaves crazy when hidden at the bottom of the screen

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock/+bug/1881941/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1909727] [NEW] snap always says refreshing: google-cloud-sdk

2020-12-30 Thread Joshua Powers
Public bug reported:

When I run `sudo snap refresh`, even when there are no snaps out of
date, the google-cloud-sdk snap will say that it is refreshed:

❯ date && sudo snap refresh --list
Wed Dec 30 08:52:43 PM PST 2020
All snaps up to date.
~ took 2s
❯ date && sudo snap refresh
Wed Dec 30 08:52:47 PM PST 2020
google-cloud-sdk 321.0.0 from Cloud SDK (google-cloud-sdk✓) refreshed
~
❯ date && sudo snap refresh
Wed Dec 30 08:52:49 PM PST 2020
google-cloud-sdk 321.0.0 from Cloud SDK (google-cloud-sdk✓) refreshed
~
❯ date && sudo snap refresh
Wed Dec 30 08:52:51 PM PST 2020
google-cloud-sdk 321.0.0 from Cloud SDK (google-cloud-sdk✓) refreshed


The logs show that no updates are available either:


Dec 30 20:52:48 ryzen snapd[1219]: storehelpers.go:551: cannot refresh: snap 
has no updates available: "bitwarden", "chromium", "code", "core", "core18", 
"core20", "discord", "docker", "gnome-3-28-1804", "google-cloud-sdk", 
"goreleaser", "gtk-common-themes", "hugo", "kubectl", "kubernetes-test-eks", 
"lpshipit", "lxd", "multipass", "node", "snapcraft", "spotify", 
"ubuntu-bug-triage", "ubuntu-cloud-image", "ubuntu-iso-download", "vault", 
"youtube-dl"
Dec 30 20:52:50 ryzen snapd[1219]: storehelpers.go:551: cannot refresh: snap 
has no updates available: "bitwarden", "chromium", "code", "core", "core18", 
"core20", "discord", "docker", "gnome-3-28-1804", "google-cloud-sdk", 
"goreleaser", "gtk-common-themes", "hugo", "kubectl", "kubernetes-test-eks", 
"lpshipit", "lxd", "multipass", "node", "snapcraft", "spotify", 
"ubuntu-bug-triage", "ubuntu-cloud-image", "ubuntu-iso-download", "vault", 
"youtube-dl"
Dec 30 20:52:52 ryzen snapd[1219]: storehelpers.go:551: cannot refresh: snap 
has no updates available: "bitwarden", "chromium", "code", "core", "core18", 
"core20", "discord", "docker", "gnome-3-28-1804", "google-cloud-sdk", 
"goreleaser", "gtk-common-themes", "hugo", "kubectl", "kubernetes-test-eks", 
"lpshipit", "lxd", "multipass", "node", "snapcraft", "spotify", 
"ubuntu-bug-triage", "ubuntu-cloud-image", "ubuntu-iso-download", "vault", 
"youtube-dl"
```

If I uninstall and install the google-cloud-sdk it continues to happen:


❯ sudo snap remove google-cloud-sdk
google-cloud-sdk removed
~
❯ sudo snap refresh
All snaps up to date.
~
❯ sudo snap install google-cloud-sdk --classic
google-cloud-sdk 321.0.0 from Cloud SDK (google-cloud-sdk✓) installed
~ took 15s
❯ sudo snap refresh
google-cloud-sdk 321.0.0 from Cloud SDK (google-cloud-sdk✓) refreshed
~
❯ sudo snap refresh
google-cloud-sdk 321.0.0 from Cloud SDK (google-cloud-sdk✓) refreshed


System Info
---
Ubuntu 20.10
snapd 2.48+20.10
core 16-2.48 10577  latest/stable  
canonical✓ core
core18   202012101944   latest/stable  
canonical✓ base
core20   20201210904latest/stable  
canonical✓ base
google-cloud-sdk 321.0.0 162latest/stable  
google-cloud-sdk✓  classic

** Affects: snapd (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909727

Title:
  snap always says refreshing: google-cloud-sdk

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/snapd/+bug/1909727/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1887190] Re: MSFT Touchpad not working on Lenovo Legion-5 15ARH05

2020-12-30 Thread wangjun
with kernel 5.10.4 , this patch work on fedora 33.



diff -Narup a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c   2020-12-14 06:41:30.0 +0800
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c   2020-12-22 14:31:53.078877000 +0800
@@ -205,6 +205,68 @@ static void acpi_gpiochip_request_irqs(s
acpi_gpiochip_request_irq(acpi_gpio, event);
 }
 
+static enum gpiod_flags
+acpi_gpio_to_gpiod_flags(const struct acpi_resource_gpio *agpio, int polarity)
+{
+   /* GpioInt() implies input configuration */
+   if (agpio->connection_type == ACPI_RESOURCE_GPIO_TYPE_INT)
+   return GPIOD_IN;
+
+   switch (agpio->io_restriction) {
+   case ACPI_IO_RESTRICT_INPUT:
+   return GPIOD_IN;
+   case ACPI_IO_RESTRICT_OUTPUT:
+   /*
+* ACPI GPIO resources don't contain an initial value for the
+* GPIO. Therefore we deduce that value from the pull field
+* and the polarity instead. If the pin is pulled up we assume
+* default to be high, if it is pulled down we assume default
+* to be low, otherwise we leave pin untouched. For active low
+* polarity values will be switched. See also
+* Documentation/firmware-guide/acpi/gpio-properties.rst.
+*/
+   switch (agpio->pin_config) {
+   case ACPI_PIN_CONFIG_PULLUP:
+   return polarity == GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW ? GPIOD_OUT_LOW : 
GPIOD_OUT_HIGH;
+   case ACPI_PIN_CONFIG_PULLDOWN:
+   return polarity == GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW ? GPIOD_OUT_HIGH : 
GPIOD_OUT_LOW;
+   default:
+   break;
+   }
+   break;
+   default:
+   break;
+   }
+
+   /*
+* Assume that the BIOS has configured the direction and pull
+* accordingly.
+*/
+   return GPIOD_ASIS;
+}
+
+static struct gpio_desc *acpi_request_own_gpiod(struct gpio_chip *chip,
+   struct acpi_resource_gpio 
*agpio,
+   unsigned int index,
+   const char *label)
+{
+   int polarity = GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH;
+   enum gpiod_flags flags = acpi_gpio_to_gpiod_flags(agpio, polarity);
+   unsigned int pin = agpio->pin_table[index];
+   struct gpio_desc *desc;
+   int ret;
+
+   desc = gpiochip_request_own_desc(chip, pin, label, polarity, flags);
+   if (IS_ERR(desc))
+   return desc;
+
+   ret = gpio_set_debounce_timeout(desc, agpio->debounce_timeout);
+   if (ret)
+   gpiochip_free_own_desc(desc);
+
+   return ret ? ERR_PTR(ret) : desc;
+}
+
 static bool acpi_gpio_in_ignore_list(const char *controller_in, int pin_in)
 {
const char *controller, *pin_str;
@@ -290,8 +352,8 @@ static acpi_status acpi_gpiochip_alloc_e
if (!handler)
return AE_OK;
 
-   desc = gpiochip_request_own_desc(chip, pin, "ACPI:Event",
-GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH, GPIOD_IN);
+   desc = acpi_request_own_gpiod(chip, agpio, 0, "ACPI:Event");
+
if (IS_ERR(desc)) {
dev_err(chip->parent,
"Failed to request GPIO for pin 0x%04X, err %ld\n",
@@ -526,39 +588,6 @@ static bool acpi_get_driver_gpio_data(st
return false;
 }
 
-static enum gpiod_flags
-acpi_gpio_to_gpiod_flags(const struct acpi_resource_gpio *agpio)
-{
-   switch (agpio->io_restriction) {
-   case ACPI_IO_RESTRICT_INPUT:
-   return GPIOD_IN;
-   case ACPI_IO_RESTRICT_OUTPUT:
-   /*
-* ACPI GPIO resources don't contain an initial value for the
-* GPIO. Therefore we deduce that value from the pull field
-* instead. If the pin is pulled up we assume default to be
-* high, if it is pulled down we assume default to be low,
-* otherwise we leave pin untouched.
-*/
-   switch (agpio->pin_config) {
-   case ACPI_PIN_CONFIG_PULLUP:
-   return GPIOD_OUT_HIGH;
-   case ACPI_PIN_CONFIG_PULLDOWN:
-   return GPIOD_OUT_LOW;
-   default:
-   break;
-   }
-   default:
-   break;
-   }
-
-   /*
-* Assume that the BIOS has configured the direction and pull
-* accordingly.
-*/
-   return GPIOD_ASIS;
-}
-
 static int
 __acpi_gpio_update_gpiod_flags(enum gpiod_flags *flags, enum gpiod_flags 
update)
 {
@@ -664,6 +693,7 @@ static int acpi_populate_gpio_lookup(str
lookup->desc = acpi_get_gpiod(agpio->resource_source.string_ptr,
  agpio->pin_table[pin_index]);

[Bug 1909703] Re: sound garbled in 20.10 with intel hdmi audio

2020-12-30 Thread Tessa
Interestingly, if I run my monitor off my NVidia card, and the audio off
the Intel HDMI, then the Intel audio works correctly. it's only when my
display is connected to the Intel DisplayPort alongside my receiver on
the Intel HDMI that it totally messes up.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909703

Title:
  sound garbled in 20.10 with intel hdmi audio

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/1909703/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1874161] Re: kpcli is unable to open a kdbx file if the file is locked by both a password and a key file

2020-12-30 Thread Alex Wang
I have a correction to my previous comment: Instead of asking, "Is this
behavior of Keepass new?" I want to convey, "Is this behavior of
KeePassX new?"

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1874161

Title:
  kpcli is unable to open a kdbx file if the file is locked by both a
  password and a key file

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kpcli/+bug/1874161/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1909712] [NEW] Unable to install GRUB to /dev/sdb

2020-12-30 Thread osz.winkelm...@brturbo.com.br
Public bug reported:

Trying to reinstall Ubuntu 20.10 in a previous problematic HD.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.10
Package: ubiquity 20.10.13
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.8.0-25.26-generic 5.8.14
Uname: Linux 5.8.0-25-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: zfs zunicode zavl icp zcommon znvpair
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu50
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
CasperVersion: 1.455
Date: Thu Dec 31 01:11:13 2020
InstallCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/casper/vmlinuz file=/cdrom/preseed/ubuntu.seed 
maybe-ubiquity quiet splash ---
LiveMediaBuild: Ubuntu 20.10 "Groovy Gorilla" - Release amd64 (20201022)
RebootRequiredPkgs:
 linux-image-5.8.0-25-generic
 linux-base
SourcePackage: ubiquity
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: ubiquity (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug groovy ubiquity-20.10.13 ubuntu

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909712

Title:
  Unable to install GRUB to /dev/sdb

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1909712/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1887190] Re: MSFT Touchpad not working on Lenovo Legion-5 15ARH05

2020-12-30 Thread wangjun
because this submit
(https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c?h=v5.10.4=2d9284c18862480bcabb331088692b51c70dad2c),

#311 do not work with kernel 5.10.4.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1887190

Title:
  MSFT Touchpad not working on Lenovo Legion-5 15ARH05

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/pop-os/+bug/1887190/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1889250] Re: Unable to calculate the upgrade to 20.04 due to nodejs from nodesource

2020-12-30 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
[Expired for ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) because there has been no
activity for 60 days.]

** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Expired

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1889250

Title:
  Unable to calculate the upgrade to 20.04 due to nodejs from nodesource

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1889250/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1902386] Re: ubuntu installer crashed

2020-12-30 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
[Expired for ubiquity (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60
days.]

** Changed in: ubiquity (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Expired

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1902386

Title:
  ubuntu installer crashed

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1902386/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1902357] Re: mise a niveau vers 20.4 lts :Un problème insoluble est survenu lors du calcul de la mise à niveau.

2020-12-30 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
[Expired for ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) because there has been no
activity for 60 days.]

** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Expired

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1902357

Title:
  mise a niveau vers 20.4 lts :Un problème insoluble est survenu lors du
  calcul de la mise à niveau.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1902357/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1909703] Re: sound garbled in 20.10 with intel hdmi audio

2020-12-30 Thread Tessa
note that if I set the output to 7.1 mode, it sounds identically garbled
to 5.1 mode. but if I set it to Digital Stereo, no sound comes out at
all.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909703

Title:
  sound garbled in 20.10 with intel hdmi audio

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/1909703/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1909703] Re: sound garbled in 20.10 with intel hdmi audio

2020-12-30 Thread Tessa
note that this sounds like this bug upstream, but using that module option 
doesn't fix the issue:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=74861

** Bug watch added: Linux Kernel Bug Tracker #74861
   https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=74861

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909703

Title:
  sound garbled in 20.10 with intel hdmi audio

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/1909703/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1909705] [NEW] Fix Realtek 8821c bluetooth fails reconnect BLE devices after suspend

2020-12-30 Thread Kai-Heng Feng
Public bug reported:

[Impact]
Connected BLE devices like keyboard and mouse won't automatically
reconnect to host after system suspend.

[Fix]
New firmware from Realtek.

[Test]
With the new firmware used, BLE keyboard and mouse will reconnect to
host by pressing any key or by moving it.

[Where problems could occur]
Tried some other Bluetooth peripherals and didn't see any regression.
This is also internally tested by Realtek.

** Affects: hwe-next
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Affects: linux-firmware (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Medium
 Status: Confirmed

** Affects: linux-firmware (Ubuntu Focal)
 Importance: Medium
 Status: Confirmed

** Affects: linux-firmware (Ubuntu Groovy)
 Importance: Medium
 Status: Confirmed

** Affects: linux-firmware (Ubuntu Hirsute)
 Importance: Medium
 Status: Confirmed


** Tags: oem-priority originate-from-1908174 stella

** Also affects: linux-firmware (Ubuntu Focal)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: linux-firmware (Ubuntu Hirsute)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: linux-firmware (Ubuntu Groovy)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: linux-firmware (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: New => Confirmed

** Changed in: linux-firmware (Ubuntu Groovy)
   Status: New => Confirmed

** Changed in: linux-firmware (Ubuntu Hirsute)
   Status: New => Confirmed

** Changed in: linux-firmware (Ubuntu Focal)
   Importance: Undecided => Medium

** Changed in: linux-firmware (Ubuntu Groovy)
   Importance: Undecided => Medium

** Changed in: linux-firmware (Ubuntu Hirsute)
   Importance: Undecided => Medium

** Tags added: oem-priority originate-from-1908174 stella

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909705

Title:
  Fix Realtek 8821c bluetooth fails reconnect BLE devices after suspend

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/hwe-next/+bug/1909705/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1874161] Re: kpcli is unable to open a kdbx file if the file is locked by both a password and a key file

2020-12-30 Thread Alex Wang
The file command shows that my file is a 2.x KDBX file.

I tried creating a new database file with KeePassX with the KDBX
extension. The file command shows the new database file is also a 2.x
KDBX file.

I also tried creating a database file with KeePassX with the KDB
extension. The file command also shows this second new file is a 2.x
KDBX file.

It seems like the installation of KeePassX from Ubuntu 18.04's repos
generates v2 Keepass file. Is this behavior of Keepass new?

Thank you!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1874161

Title:
  kpcli is unable to open a kdbx file if the file is locked by both a
  password and a key file

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kpcli/+bug/1874161/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1909687] Re: Cannot compile kernel using procedure at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/BuildYourOwnKernel

2020-12-30 Thread Mark Allyn
I am going to once again try to do the compile with the version from the git 
repository. I am on the same system. First of all, before I go any further, 
here is the dpkg -l command to show you what packages are on the system as I 
attempt to do the build:
=
maallyn@li1004-144:~/bionic$ dpkg -l
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend
|/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
||/ Name  Version ArchitectureDescription
+++-=-===-===-===
ii  accountsservice   0.6.45-1ubuntu1 amd64   query and manipulate 
user account information
ii  acl   2.2.52-3build1  amd64   Access control list 
utilities
ii  acpid 1:2.0.28-1ubunt amd64   Advanced 
Configuration and Power Interface even
ii  adduser   3.116ubuntu1all add and remove users 
and groups
ii  amd64-microcode   3.20191021.1+re amd64   Processor microcode 
firmware for AMD CPUs
ii  apparmor  2.12-4ubuntu5.1 amd64   user-space parser 
utility for AppArmor
ii  apport2.20.9-0ubuntu7 all automatically 
generate crash reports for debugg
ii  apport-symptoms   0.20all symptom scripts for 
apport
ii  apt   1.6.12ubuntu0.2 amd64   commandline package 
manager
ii  apt-utils 1.6.12ubuntu0.2 amd64   package management 
related utility programs
ii  asciidoc  8.6.10-2all Highly configurable 
text format for writing doc
ii  asciidoc-base 8.6.10-2all Minimal version of 
asciidoc not suitable for pd
ii  asciidoc-common   8.6.10-2all Basic data and 
configuration files for asciidoc
ii  at3.1.20-3.1ubunt amd64   Delayed job execution 
and batch processing
ii  autoconf  2.69-11 all automatic configure 
script builder
ii  automake  1:1.15.1-3ubunt all Tool for generating 
GNU Standards-compliant Mak
ii  autopoint 0.19.8.1-6ubunt all The autopoint program 
from GNU gettext
ii  autotools-dev 20180224.1  all Update infrastructure 
for config.{guess,sub} fi
ii  base-files10.1ubuntu2.10  amd64   Debian base system 
miscellaneous files
ii  base-passwd   3.5.44  amd64   Debian base system 
master password and group fi
ii  bash  4.4.18-2ubuntu1 amd64   GNU Bourne Again SHell
ii  bash-completion   1:2.8-1ubuntu1  all programmable 
completion for the bash shell
ii  bc1.07.1-2amd64   GNU bc arbitrary 
precision calculator language
ii  bcache-tools  1.0.8-2ubuntu0. amd64   bcache userspace tools
ii  bind9-host1:9.11.3+dfsg-1 amd64   DNS lookup utility 
(deprecated)
ii  binutils  2.30-21ubuntu1~ amd64   GNU assembler, linker 
and binary utilities
ii  binutils-common:amd64 2.30-21ubuntu1~ amd64   Common files for the 
GNU assembler, linker and
ii  binutils-x86-64-linux 2.30-21ubuntu1~ amd64   GNU binary utilities, 
for x86-64-linux-gnu targ
ii  bison 2:3.0.4.dfsg-1b amd64   YACC-compatible 
parser generator
ii  bsdmainutils  11.1.2ubuntu1   amd64   collection of more 
utilities from FreeBSD
ii  bsdutils  1:2.31.1-0.4ubu amd64   basic utilities from 
4.4BSD-Lite
ii  btrfs-progs   4.15.1-1build1  amd64   Checksumming Copy on 
Write Filesystem utilities
ii  btrfs-tools   4.15.1-1build1  amd64   transitional dummy 
package
ii  build-essential   12.4ubuntu1 amd64   Informational list of 
build-essential packages
ii  busybox-initramfs 1:1.27.2-2ubunt amd64   Standalone shell 
setup for initramfs
ii  busybox-static1:1.27.2-2ubunt amd64   Standalone rescue 
shell with tons of builtin ut
ii  byobu 5.125-0ubuntu1  all text window manager, 
shell multiplexer, integra
ii  bzip2 1.0.6-8.1ubuntu amd64   high-quality 
block-sorting file compressor - ut
ii  ca-certificates   20201027ubuntu0 all Common CA certificates
ii  ca-certificates-java  20180516ubuntu1 all Common CA 
certificates (JKS keystore)
ii  cloud-guest-utils 0.30-0ubuntu5   all cloud guest utilities
ii  cloud-initramfs-copym 0.40ubuntu1.1   all copy initramfs 
modules into root filesystem for
ii  cloud-initramfs-dyn-n 0.40ubuntu1.1   all write a network 
interface file in /run 

[Bug 1909687] Re: Cannot compile kernel using procedure at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/BuildYourOwnKernel

2020-12-30 Thread Mark Allyn
Here is some more information. I follow the suggestion to I do apt-get source, 
but am having
more problems. Here is the diary:

===
Start with fresh provision of Ubuntu 18.02 on Linode VPS

Following performed first on system console

apt-get update
apt-get dist-upgrade
apt-get upgrade

Uncommended all instances of deb-src

rebooted machine

System booted up,

apt-get install ssh

Added user account with sudo access to root

As user, run ssh-keygen and then install public
key for my workstation

Confirm Ubuntu and Kernel version before doing anything

maallyn@li1004-144:~$ lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description:Ubuntu 18.04.5 LTS
Release:18.04
Codename:   bionic

maallyn@li1004-144:~$ uname -a
Linux li1004-144 4.15.0-128-generic #131-Ubuntu SMP Wed Dec 9 06:57:35 UTC 2020 
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

Now with user account enabled root via sudo

sudo apt-get install build-essential

following procedure in https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/BuildYourOwnKernel

sudo apt-get build-dep linux linux-image-$(uname -r)
(observed, but saw no errors)

sudo apt-get install libncurses-dev flex bison openssl libssl-dev dkms
libelf-dev libudev-dev libpci-dev libiberty-dev autoconf fakeroot

(Please note that I had to add fakeroot, which is used
but not mentioned in the procedure.

This command was run as the user; not root. However, even though it appeared
to execute okay, I notice there was no source code in the resulting tar file.

Googling around, I find that with 18.04, we need to do:

apt-get source linux-source as the user (not root)

Output of that command is:

==
maallyn@li1004-144:~$ apt-get source linux-source
Reading package lists... Done
Picking 'linux-meta' as source package instead of 'linux-source'
NOTICE: 'linux-meta' packaging is maintained in the 'Git' version control 
system at:
git://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-kernel/ubuntu/+source/linux-meta/+git/bionic
Please use:
git clone 
git://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-kernel/ubuntu/+source/linux-meta/+git/bionic
to retrieve the latest (possibly unreleased) updates to the package.
Need to get 25.4 kB of source archives.
Get:1 http://mirrors.linode.com/ubuntu bionic-updates/main linux-meta 
4.15.0.128.115 (dsc) [11.0 kB]
Get:2 http://mirrors.linode.com/ubuntu bionic-updates/main linux-meta 
4.15.0.128.115 (tar) [14.4 kB]
Fetched 25.4 kB in 0s (0 B/s)
dpkg-source: info: extracting linux-meta in linux-meta-4.15.0.128.115
dpkg-source: info: unpacking linux-meta_4.15.0.128.115.tar.xz
===

I do:

git clone git://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-kernel/ubuntu/+source/linux-
meta/+git/bionic

This did execute okay, but the result is suspicious; there are no source files
at all.

If I do a find from the top, I get the following:

=
maallyn@li1004-144:~/bionic$ find .
.
./.git
./.git/index
./.git/hooks
./.git/hooks/applypatch-msg.sample
./.git/hooks/post-update.sample
./.git/hooks/pre-applypatch.sample
./.git/hooks/commit-msg.sample
./.git/hooks/prepare-commit-msg.sample
./.git/hooks/pre-rebase.sample
./.git/hooks/pre-commit.sample
./.git/hooks/pre-push.sample
./.git/hooks/fsmonitor-watchman.sample
./.git/hooks/update.sample
./.git/hooks/pre-receive.sample
./.git/branches
./.git/description
./.git/objects
./.git/objects/pack
./.git/objects/pack/pack-1929ba54decacfff807309c467430129b87b4ad4.pack
./.git/objects/pack/pack-1929ba54decacfff807309c467430129b87b4ad4.idx
./.git/objects/info
./.git/info
./.git/info/exclude
./.git/refs
./.git/refs/tags
./.git/refs/remotes
./.git/refs/remotes/origin
./.git/refs/remotes/origin/HEAD
./.git/refs/heads
./.git/refs/heads/master
./.git/HEAD
./.git/packed-refs
./.git/logs
./.git/logs/refs
./.git/logs/refs/remotes
./.git/logs/refs/remotes/origin
./.git/logs/refs/remotes/origin/HEAD
./.git/logs/refs/heads
./.git/logs/refs/heads/master
./.git/logs/HEAD
./.git/config
./update-version
./debian
./debian/scripts
./debian/scripts/misc
./debian/scripts/misc/git-ubuntu-log
./debian/compat
./debian/source
./debian/source/options
./debian/source/format
./debian/dkms-versions
./debian/changelog
./debian/rules
./debian/control.d
./debian/control.d/transitionals-hwe-edge
./debian/control.d/powerpc64-emb
./debian/control.d/signed-lowlatency
./debian/control.d/generic
./debian/control.d/generic-lpae
./debian/control.d/lowlatency
./debian/control.d/virtual
./debian/control.d/transitionals-hwe
./debian/control.d/powerpc-smp
./debian/control.d/signed-generic
./debian/control.d/powerpc-e500mc
./debian/control.d/powerpc64-smp
./debian/copyright
./debian/control.common
===

I am following the procedure in case this is okay. I am not doing the
git clone 

[Bug 1909698] Re: outdated tzdata in all releases

2020-12-30 Thread Brian Murray
** Summary changed:

- outdated tzdata  in 18.04
+ outdated tzdata in all releases

** Tags added: fr-1021

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909698

Title:
  outdated tzdata in all releases

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tzdata/+bug/1909698/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1765795] Re: gsd-wacom crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_check_value()

2020-12-30 Thread Juan Diego Pérez Bohórquez
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1763316 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1763316

Is there already a solution to this problem?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1765795

Title:
  gsd-wacom crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_check_value()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-settings-daemon/+bug/1765795/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1872870] Re: Ubuntu 20.04 latest update mouse pointer leaves square trails on desktop

2020-12-30 Thread Christopher Patti
Hi everyone!

Let me just say that System76's awesome lifetime support just showed
itself to be PRICELESS in my book!

Nathan from System76 gave me the following work-around, and it WORKED!

Add:

```
CLUTTER_PAINT=disable-clipped-redraws:disable-culling
```

to /etc/environment and reboot! For me anyway on Pop! OS 20.10, no more
zoomed mouse cursor trails!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1872870

Title:
  Ubuntu 20.04 latest update mouse pointer leaves square trails on
  desktop

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/meta-gnome3/+bug/1872870/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1903969] Re: failed to boot to GUI: i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm] *ERROR* Link Training Unsuccessful

2020-12-30 Thread koba
** Tags added: originate-from-1894066

** Tags added: originate-from-1895638

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1903969

Title:
  failed to boot to GUI: i915 :00:02.0: [drm] *ERROR* Link Training
  Unsuccessful

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/hwe-next/+bug/1903969/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1903969] Re: failed to boot to GUI: i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm] *ERROR* Link Training Unsuccessful

2020-12-30 Thread koba
** Tags added: originate-from-1907526

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1903969

Title:
  failed to boot to GUI: i915 :00:02.0: [drm] *ERROR* Link Training
  Unsuccessful

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/hwe-next/+bug/1903969/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1909687] Re: Cannot compile kernel using procedure at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/BuildYourOwnKernel

2020-12-30 Thread Mark Allyn
Sorry, I accidentally shut down the web site. You should be able to go
to build-attempt.txt now

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909687

Title:
  Cannot compile kernel using procedure at
  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/BuildYourOwnKernel

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1909687/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1909703] [NEW] sound garbled in 20.10 with intel hdmi audio

2020-12-30 Thread Tessa
Public bug reported:

I've been having ongoing issues with pulse and my nvidia video card
doing hdmi audio, so I thought I'd try using my builtin intel HDMI port
for audio instead. However, when I switch the HDMI cable to that port,
and select it in pulse, all the audio sounds crackly and garbled, like
it's trying to play twice as many samples per second as it should. given
this is with open source drivers, this may be a kernel issue and not a
pulse issue, but I'm not sure how to fully determine that.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.10
Package: pulseaudio 1:13.99.2-1ubuntu2.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.8.0-33.36-lowlatency 5.8.17
Uname: Linux 5.8.0-33-lowlatency x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: zfs zunicode zavl icp zcommon znvpair
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu50.3
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
CurrentDesktop: X-Cinnamon
Date: Wed Dec 30 18:05:38 2020
InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-07-15 (168 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20200423)
SourcePackage: pulseaudio
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to groovy on 2020-10-24 (68 days ago)
dmi.bios.date: 04/18/2018
dmi.bios.release: 4.6
dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc.
dmi.bios.version: 3503
dmi.board.asset.tag: To be filled by O.E.M.
dmi.board.name: GRYPHON Z97
dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC.
dmi.board.version: Rev 1.xx
dmi.chassis.asset.tag: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
dmi.chassis.type: 3
dmi.chassis.vendor: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
dmi.chassis.version: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvr3503:bd04/18/2018:br4.6:svnASUS:pnAllSeries:pvrSystemVersion:rvnASUSTeKCOMPUTERINC.:rnGRYPHONZ97:rvrRev1.xx:cvnToBeFilledByO.E.M.:ct3:cvrToBeFilledByO.E.M.:
dmi.product.family: ASUS MB
dmi.product.name: All Series
dmi.product.sku: All
dmi.product.version: System Version
dmi.sys.vendor: ASUS
modified.conffile..etc.pulse.default.pa: [modified]
mtime.conffile..etc.pulse.default.pa: 2020-09-10T05:59:01.429804

** Affects: pulseaudio (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug groovy

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909703

Title:
  sound garbled in 20.10 with intel hdmi audio

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/1909703/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1881191] Re: Lubuntu 20.04 installation does not add swap partition

2020-12-30 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: calamares
   Status: Unknown => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1881191

Title:
  Lubuntu 20.04 installation does not add swap partition

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/calamares/+bug/1881191/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1909677] Re: package grub-efi-amd64-signed 1.155.1+2.04-1ubuntu35.1 failed to install/upgrade: installed grub-efi-amd64-signed package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit stat

2020-12-30 Thread Leslie Satenstein
Problem will persist through update attempts

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909677

Title:
  package grub-efi-amd64-signed 1.155.1+2.04-1ubuntu35.1 failed to
  install/upgrade: installed grub-efi-amd64-signed package post-
  installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2-signed/+bug/1909677/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1909687] Re: Cannot compile kernel using procedure at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/BuildYourOwnKernel

2020-12-30 Thread You-Sheng Yang
Hi, don't run apt-get source as root. build-attempt.txt not found.

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909687

Title:
  Cannot compile kernel using procedure at
  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/BuildYourOwnKernel

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1909687/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 257135] Re: notify-send(1) can't replace an existing notification

2020-12-30 Thread WinEunuchs2Unix
It would be nice to have the patch applied both the standard call from
bash as well as the python libraries (2.7.12 and 3.x).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/257135

Title:
  notify-send(1) can't replace an existing notification

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libnotify/+bug/257135/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1909616] ProcEnviron.txt

2020-12-30 Thread Plamen
apport information

** Attachment added: "ProcEnviron.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909616/+attachment/5448116/+files/ProcEnviron.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909616

Title:
  Same user appears to be logged multiple times

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-session/+bug/1909616/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1909616] ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt

2020-12-30 Thread Plamen
apport information

** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909616/+attachment/5448115/+files/ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909616

Title:
  Same user appears to be logged multiple times

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-session/+bug/1909616/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1909616] Dependencies.txt

2020-12-30 Thread Plamen
apport information

** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909616/+attachment/5448114/+files/Dependencies.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909616

Title:
  Same user appears to be logged multiple times

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-session/+bug/1909616/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1909616] Re: Same user appears to be logged multiple times

2020-12-30 Thread Plamen
I personally haven't logged multiple times. Also this is reproducible
immediately after login. Is there a way to check if some program is
doing this?

Also I think its worth mentioning that I changed my password (in attempt
to prevent this) and it continued to do it.

** Tags added: apport-collected focal

** Description changed:

  When I try to reboot it appears same user (the one I`m currently logged)
  is logged two additional times simultaneously. Check attached image
  
  Description:  Ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS
  Release:  20.04
  
  
  Not sure what this package is related to. 
  Expected to happen: When the reboot option was selected to start rebooting.
  What happened: Showed the window from the attached image with multiple logins 
from the same user.
+ --- 
+ ProblemType: Bug
+ ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.14
+ Architecture: amd64
+ CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
+ CurrentDesktop: GNOME
+ DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
+ InstallationDate: Installed on 2015-06-17 (2023 days ago)
+ InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-GNOME 15.04 "Vivid Vervet" - Release amd64 
(20150422)
+ NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
+ Package: gnome-session 3.36.0-2ubuntu1
+ PackageArchitecture: all
+ ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-58.64-generic 5.4.73
+ Tags:  focal
+ Uname: Linux 5.4.0-58-generic x86_64
+ UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
+ UserGroups: adm cdrom dip libvirt libvirtd lpadmin plugdev sambashare sudo
+ _MarkForUpload: True

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909616

Title:
  Same user appears to be logged multiple times

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-session/+bug/1909616/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1909617] Re: Password is asked for everything

2020-12-30 Thread Plamen
I understand about the needed package but I'm not sure how to proceed in
this case. It does not seem to be related to specific program.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909617

Title:
  Password is asked for everything

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1909617/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1877701] Re: Mailman3 3.2.2-1 is incompatible with Python3 3.8.2-0

2020-12-30 Thread soletan
FWIW I was able to fix it temporarily by replacing

   time.clock()

near end of file /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/mailman/utilities/uid.py
with

   time.process_time()

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1877701

Title:
  Mailman3 3.2.2-1 is incompatible with Python3 3.8.2-0

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mailman3/+bug/1877701/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1906945] Re: package texlive-base 2019.20200218-1 failed to install/upgrade: Versuch, »/usr/share/doc/texlive-doc/generic/iftex/iftex.pdf« zu überschreiben, welches auch in Paket texlive-plain-ge

2020-12-30 Thread Juhani Numminen
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1875050 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1875050

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1875050
   package texlive-base 2019.20200218-1 failed to install/upgrade: trying to 
overwrite '/usr/share/doc/texlive-doc/generic/iftex/iftex.pdf', which is also 
in package texlive-plain-generic 2017.20180305-2

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1906945

Title:
  package texlive-base 2019.20200218-1 failed to install/upgrade:
  Versuch, »/usr/share/doc/texlive-doc/generic/iftex/iftex.pdf« zu
  überschreiben, welches auch in Paket texlive-plain-generic
  2017.20180305-2 ist

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/texlive-base/+bug/1906945/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1909699] [NEW] Please upgrate to Meld 3.21 for Hirsute Hippo

2020-12-30 Thread PJSingh5000
Public bug reported:

Meld 3.21 integrates better with the recent versions of Ubuntu.
Please consider upgrading the deb package to version 3.21.x for Hirsute Hippo.

References:

https://askubuntu.com/a/1302505/100356

https://github.com/GNOME/meld

** Affects: meld (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Attachment added: "Screenshot of Meld 3.21.1"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909699/+attachment/5448113/+files/Screenshot%20from%202020-12-30%2018-20-55.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909699

Title:
  Please upgrate to Meld 3.21 for Hirsute Hippo

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/meld/+bug/1909699/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1909695] Re: Software application hasn't been installed

2020-12-30 Thread Chris Guiver
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. Please execute the following command only once, as it
will automatically gather debugging information, in a terminal:

apport-collect 1909695

When reporting bugs in the future please use apport by using 'ubuntu-
bug' and the name of the package affected. You can learn more about this
functionality at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReportingBugs.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909695

Title:
  Software application hasn't been installed

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-meta/+bug/1909695/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1877701] Re: Mailman3 3.2.2-1 is incompatible with Python3 3.8.2-0

2020-12-30 Thread soletan
When transferring MTA setup to latest Ubuntu LTS I am trying to upgrade
to latest mailman for running it another 4 years. As far as I can see
there is no progress on this one and I'm currently stumbling right over
this issue. mailman3 seems to be non-functional in Ubuntu 20.04 ...
maybe you could at least mark mailman3 as unstable/beta to prevent other
interested users from trying to installed it for the whole setup is far
from being well-documented and straight forward. After days of spending
in trying to set up mailman3 this issue being unresolved for months is a
bummer.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1877701

Title:
  Mailman3 3.2.2-1 is incompatible with Python3 3.8.2-0

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mailman3/+bug/1877701/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1909698] [NEW] outdated tzdata in 18.04

2020-12-30 Thread Tw1ce
Public bug reported:

https://www.iana.org/time-zones tzdata 2020f already exists, please
update the package.

** Affects: tzdata (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909698

Title:
  outdated tzdata  in 18.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tzdata/+bug/1909698/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1909696] Re: nvidia-304 fails on Ubunut 18.04

2020-12-30 Thread Nephilim1973
Sorry, wrong driver version...

** Changed in: nvidia-graphics-drivers-375 (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909696

Title:
  nvidia-304 fails on Ubunut 18.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-375/+bug/1909696/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1909696] [NEW] nvidia-304 fails on Ubunut 18.04

2020-12-30 Thread Nephilim1973
Public bug reported:

$ uname -a
Linux p5kws 5.4.0-58-generic #64~18.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Dec 9 17:11:11 UTC 2020 
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

$ cat /etc/*-release
DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu
DISTRIB_RELEASE=18.04
DISTRIB_CODENAME=bionic
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Ubuntu 18.04.5 LTS"
NAME="Ubuntu"
VERSION="18.04.5 LTS (Bionic Beaver)"
ID=ubuntu
ID_LIKE=debian
PRETTY_NAME="Ubuntu 18.04.5 LTS"
VERSION_ID="18.04"
HOME_URL="https://www.ubuntu.com/;
SUPPORT_URL="https://help.ubuntu.com/;
BUG_REPORT_URL="https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/;
PRIVACY_POLICY_URL="https://www.ubuntu.com/legal/terms-and-policies/privacy-policy;
VERSION_CODENAME=bionic
UBUNTU_CODENAME=bionic

$ sudo ubuntu-drivers devices
== /sys/devices/pci:00/:00:01.0/:01:00.0 ==
modalias : pci:v10DEd0161sv1458sd3415bc03sc00i00
vendor   : NVIDIA Corporation
model: NV44 [GeForce 6200 TurboCache]
driver   : nvidia-304 - third-party free recommended
driver   : xserver-xorg-video-nouveau - distro free builtin

$ sudo ubuntu-drivers autoinstall
Paketlisten werden gelesen... Fertig
Abhängigkeitsbaum wird aufgebaut.   
Statusinformationen werden eingelesen Fertig
Einige Pakete konnten nicht installiert werden. Das kann bedeuten, dass
Sie eine unmögliche Situation angefordert haben oder, wenn Sie die
Unstable-Distribution verwenden, dass einige erforderliche Pakete noch
nicht erstellt wurden oder Incoming noch nicht verlassen haben.
Die folgenden Informationen helfen Ihnen vielleicht, die Situation zu lösen:

Die folgenden Pakete haben unerfüllte Abhängigkeiten:
 nvidia-304 : Hängt ab von: xorg-video-abi-11 ist aber nicht installierbar oder
 xorg-video-abi-12 ist aber nicht installierbar oder
 xorg-video-abi-13 ist aber nicht installierbar oder
 xorg-video-abi-14 ist aber nicht installierbar oder
 xorg-video-abi-15 ist aber nicht installierbar oder
 xorg-video-abi-18 ist aber nicht installierbar oder
 xorg-video-abi-19 ist aber nicht installierbar oder
 xorg-video-abi-20 ist aber nicht installierbar oder
 xorg-video-abi-23
  Hängt ab von: xserver-xorg-core
E: Probleme können nicht korrigiert werden, Sie haben zurückgehaltene defekte 
Pakete.


Error messages unfortunatelly appear in German.
Here is a translated version:

$ sudo ubuntu-drivers autoinstall
Package lists are being read ... Done
Dependency tree is built.
Status information is read in  Done
Some packages could not be installed. That can mean that
You have requested an impossible situation or when you have the
Unstable distro use that some required packages still
have not been created or have not yet left Incoming.
The following information may help you resolve the situation:

The following packages have unfulfilled dependencies:
 nvidia-304: Depends on: xorg-video-abi-11 but cannot be installed or
 xorg-video-abi-12 cannot be installed or
 xorg-video-abi-13 cannot be installed or
 xorg-video-abi-14 cannot be installed or
 xorg-video-abi-15 cannot be installed or
 xorg-video-abi-18 cannot be installed or
 xorg-video-abi-19 cannot be installed or
 xorg-video-abi-20 cannot be installed or
 xorg-video-abi-23
  Depends on: xserver-xorg-core
E: Problems cannot be corrected, you have defective packages withheld.

** Affects: nvidia-graphics-drivers-375 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909696

Title:
  nvidia-304 fails on Ubunut 18.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-375/+bug/1909696/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1909697] [NEW] nvidia-304 fails on Ubunut 18.04

2020-12-30 Thread Nephilim1973
Public bug reported:

$ uname -a
Linux p5kws 5.4.0-58-generic #64~18.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Dec 9 17:11:11 UTC 2020 
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

$ cat /etc/*-release
DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu
DISTRIB_RELEASE=18.04
DISTRIB_CODENAME=bionic
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Ubuntu 18.04.5 LTS"
NAME="Ubuntu"
VERSION="18.04.5 LTS (Bionic Beaver)"
ID=ubuntu
ID_LIKE=debian
PRETTY_NAME="Ubuntu 18.04.5 LTS"
VERSION_ID="18.04"
HOME_URL="https://www.ubuntu.com/;
SUPPORT_URL="https://help.ubuntu.com/;
BUG_REPORT_URL="https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/;
PRIVACY_POLICY_URL="https://www.ubuntu.com/legal/terms-and-policies/privacy-policy;
VERSION_CODENAME=bionic
UBUNTU_CODENAME=bionic

$ sudo ubuntu-drivers devices
== /sys/devices/pci:00/:00:01.0/:01:00.0 ==
modalias : pci:v10DEd0161sv1458sd3415bc03sc00i00
vendor : NVIDIA Corporation
model : NV44 [GeForce 6200 TurboCache]
driver : nvidia-304 - third-party free recommended
driver : xserver-xorg-video-nouveau - distro free builtin

$ sudo ubuntu-drivers autoinstall
Paketlisten werden gelesen... Fertig
Abhängigkeitsbaum wird aufgebaut.
Statusinformationen werden eingelesen Fertig
Einige Pakete konnten nicht installiert werden. Das kann bedeuten, dass
Sie eine unmögliche Situation angefordert haben oder, wenn Sie die
Unstable-Distribution verwenden, dass einige erforderliche Pakete noch
nicht erstellt wurden oder Incoming noch nicht verlassen haben.
Die folgenden Informationen helfen Ihnen vielleicht, die Situation zu lösen:

Die folgenden Pakete haben unerfüllte Abhängigkeiten:
 nvidia-304 : Hängt ab von: xorg-video-abi-11 ist aber nicht installierbar oder
 xorg-video-abi-12 ist aber nicht installierbar oder
 xorg-video-abi-13 ist aber nicht installierbar oder
 xorg-video-abi-14 ist aber nicht installierbar oder
 xorg-video-abi-15 ist aber nicht installierbar oder
 xorg-video-abi-18 ist aber nicht installierbar oder
 xorg-video-abi-19 ist aber nicht installierbar oder
 xorg-video-abi-20 ist aber nicht installierbar oder
 xorg-video-abi-23
  Hängt ab von: xserver-xorg-core
E: Probleme können nicht korrigiert werden, Sie haben zurückgehaltene defekte 
Pakete.

Error messages unfortunatelly appear in German.
Here is a translated version:

$ sudo ubuntu-drivers autoinstall
Package lists are being read ... Done
Dependency tree is built.
Status information is read in  Done
Some packages could not be installed. That can mean that
You have requested an impossible situation or when you have the
Unstable distro use that some required packages still
have not been created or have not yet left Incoming.
The following information may help you resolve the situation:

The following packages have unfulfilled dependencies:
 nvidia-304: Depends on: xorg-video-abi-11 but cannot be installed or
 xorg-video-abi-12 cannot be installed or
 xorg-video-abi-13 cannot be installed or
 xorg-video-abi-14 cannot be installed or
 xorg-video-abi-15 cannot be installed or
 xorg-video-abi-18 cannot be installed or
 xorg-video-abi-19 cannot be installed or
 xorg-video-abi-20 cannot be installed or
 xorg-video-abi-23
  Depends on: xserver-xorg-core
E: Problems cannot be corrected, you have defective packages withheld.

** Affects: nvidia-graphics-drivers-304 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909697

Title:
  nvidia-304 fails on Ubunut 18.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-304/+bug/1909697/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1909677] Re: package grub-efi-amd64-signed 1.155.1+2.04-1ubuntu35.1 failed to install/upgrade: installed grub-efi-amd64-signed package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit stat

2020-12-30 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

** Changed in: grub2-signed (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909677

Title:
  package grub-efi-amd64-signed 1.155.1+2.04-1ubuntu35.1 failed to
  install/upgrade: installed grub-efi-amd64-signed package post-
  installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2-signed/+bug/1909677/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1861235] Re: zfs recv PANIC at range_tree.c:304:range_tree_find_impl()

2020-12-30 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

** Changed in: zfs-linux (Ubuntu Bionic)
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1861235

Title:
  zfs recv PANIC at range_tree.c:304:range_tree_find_impl()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/1861235/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1909695] [NEW] Software application hasn't been installed

2020-12-30 Thread Viktor Nagy
Public bug reported:

I installed Ubuntu LTS with mini.iso. After choosing ubuntu-desktop in
task selection gnome-software was not installed.

** Affects: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909695

Title:
  Software application hasn't been installed

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-meta/+bug/1909695/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1853007]

2020-12-30 Thread Rob Lemley
I can confirm this as well. 
This appears to be in the message sending code. I would not be surprised if 
saving drafts also triggers these files as saving a draft shares a lot ofg the 
same code as actually sending.

Today at 14:31 local time, I sent the email about building Thunderbird
85.0b3. And I have several files in tmp from that time that contain that
message in various states:

```
-rw--- 1 rob  rob 3959 Dec 30 14:31 key-3.asc
-rw--- 1 rob  rob78973 Dec 30 14:31 nscopy-2.tmp
-rw--- 1 rob  rob 3753 Dec 30 14:31 nsemail-2.html
-rw--- 1 rob  rob78973 Dec 30 14:31 nsemail-3.eml
-rw--- 1 rob  rob46469 Dec 30 14:31 nsmail-2.tmp
-rw--- 1 rob  rob  517 Dec 30 14:31 nsmail-3.tmp
```

* **key-3.asc** - This is a copy of my public key
* **nscopy-2.tmp** - The entire email, headers and all attachments as one would 
expect to find in a maildir/mbox file
* **nsemail-2.html** - The email body in HTML format
* **nsemail-3.eml** - The entire email, same as nscopy-2.tmp
* **nsmail-2.tmp** - The release notes that were included in the email (and 
html attachment, so this file is HTML)
** *nsmail-3.tmp** - The email body in plain text

Based on the files left behind, it looks like when a message is sent,
the various mime parts are written out to temporary files to assemble
the final message before sending. That produces nsemail-3.eml.
nscopy-2.tmp is maybe because of the copy to the sent folder.

This is with Thunderbird 78.6.0.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1853007

Title:
  nsemail and nscopy files left in /tmp

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/thunderbird/+bug/1853007/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1909693] Re: package lxd (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: new lxd package pre-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

2020-12-30 Thread Apport retracing service
** Tags removed: need-duplicate-check

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909693

Title:
  package lxd (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: new lxd package
  pre-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxd/+bug/1909693/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1909693] [NEW] package lxd (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: new lxd package pre-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

2020-12-30 Thread Pete Ashdown
Public bug reported:

do-release-upgrade on two separate 18.04.05 to 20.04.1 servers stall on
lxd install

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
Package: lxd (not installed)
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-128.131-generic 4.15.18
Uname: Linux 4.15.0-128-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.14
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
Date: Wed Dec 30 14:58:50 2020
ErrorMessage: new lxd package pre-installation script subprocess returned error 
exit status 1
Python3Details: /usr/bin/python3.8, Python 3.8.5, python3-minimal, 
3.8.2-0ubuntu2
PythonDetails: /usr/bin/python2.7, Python 2.7.18, python-is-python2, 2.7.17-4
RelatedPackageVersions:
 dpkg 1.19.7ubuntu3
 apt  2.0.2ubuntu0.2
SourcePackage: lxd
Title: package lxd (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: new lxd package 
pre-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to focal on 2020-12-30 (0 days ago)

** Affects: lxd (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-package focal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909693

Title:
  package lxd (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: new lxd package
  pre-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxd/+bug/1909693/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1853007] Re: nsemail and nscopy files left in /tmp

2020-12-30 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: thunderbird
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1853007

Title:
  nsemail and nscopy files left in /tmp

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/thunderbird/+bug/1853007/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1853007]

2020-12-30 Thread Ben-bucksch
I also see a large number of ns* temporary files that Thunderbird leaves
behind in `/tmp/`. This is quite annoying.

I've currently got almost 1000 ns* files there:
```
/tmp/nsemail-328.eml  /tmp/nsemail-622.eml  /tmp/nsmail-2.pdf
/tmp/nsemail-329.eml  /tmp/nsemail-623.eml  /tmp/nsmail-2.png
/tmp/nsemail-32.eml   /tmp/nsemail-624.eml  /tmp/nsmail-2.tmp
/tmp/nsemail-330.eml  /tmp/nsemail-625.eml  /tmp/nsmail-30.tmp
/tmp/nsemail-331.eml  /tmp/nsemail-626.eml  /tmp/nsmail-31.tmp
/tmp/nsemail-332.eml  /tmp/nsemail-627.eml  /tmp/nsmail-32.tmp
/tmp/nsemail-333.eml  /tmp/nsemail-628.eml  /tmp/nsmail-33.tmp
/tmp/nsemail-334.eml  /tmp/nsemail-629.eml  /tmp/nsmail-34.tmp
/tmp/nsemail-335.eml  /tmp/nsemail-62.eml   /tmp/nsmail-3.eml
/tmp/nsemail-336.eml  /tmp/nsemail-630.eml  /tmp/nsmail-3.jpeg
/tmp/nsemail-337.eml  /tmp/nsemail-631.eml  /tmp/nsmail-3.pdf
/tmp/nsemail-338.eml  /tmp/nsemail-632.eml  /tmp/nsmail-3.tmp
/tmp/nsemail-339.eml  /tmp/nsemail-633.eml  /tmp/nsmail-4.eml
/tmp/nsemail-33.eml   /tmp/nsemail-634.eml  /tmp/nsmail-4.jpeg
/tmp/nsemail-340.eml  /tmp/nsemail-635.eml  /tmp/nsmail-4.pdf
/tmp/nsemail-341.eml  /tmp/nsemail-636.eml  /tmp/nsmail-4.tmp
/tmp/nsemail-342.eml  /tmp/nsemail-637.eml  /tmp/nsmail-5.eml
/tmp/nsemail-343.eml  /tmp/nsemail-638.eml  /tmp/nsmail-5.jpeg
/tmp/nsemail-344.eml  /tmp/nsemail-639.eml  /tmp/nsmail-5.pdf
/tmp/nsemail-345.eml  /tmp/nsemail-63.eml   /tmp/nsmail-5.tmp
/tmp/nsemail-346.eml  /tmp/nsemail-640.eml  /tmp/nsmail-6.eml
/tmp/nsemail-347.eml  /tmp/nsemail-641.eml  /tmp/nsmail-6.jpeg
/tmp/nsemail-348.eml  /tmp/nsemail-642.eml  /tmp/nsmail-6.pdf
/tmp/nsemail-349.eml  /tmp/nsemail-643.eml  /tmp/nsmail-6.tmp
/tmp/nsemail-34.eml   /tmp/nsemail-644.eml  /tmp/nsmail-7.jpeg
/tmp/nsemail-350.eml  /tmp/nsemail-645.eml  /tmp/nsmail-7.pdf
/tmp/nsemail-351.eml  /tmp/nsemail-646.eml  /tmp/nsmail-7.tmp
/tmp/nsemail-352.eml  /tmp/nsemail-647.eml  /tmp/nsmail-8.pdf
/tmp/nsemail-353.eml  /tmp/nsemail-648.eml  /tmp/nsmail-8.tmp
/tmp/nsemail-354.eml  /tmp/nsemail-649.eml  /tmp/nsmail-9.pdf
/tmp/nsemail-355.eml  /tmp/nsemail-64.eml   /tmp/nsmail-9.tmp
/tmp/nsemail-356.eml  /tmp/nsemail-650.eml  /tmp/nsmail.asc
/tmp/nsemail-357.eml  /tmp/nsemail-651.eml  /tmp/nsmail.docx
/tmp/nsemail-358.eml  /tmp/nsemail-652.eml  /tmp/nsmail.eml
/tmp/nsemail-359.eml  /tmp/nsemail-653.eml  /tmp/nsmail.ics
/tmp/nsemail-35.eml   /tmp/nsemail-654.eml  /tmp/nsmail.jpeg
/tmp/nsemail-360.eml  /tmp/nsemail-655.eml  /tmp/nsmail.odt
/tmp/nsemail-361.eml  /tmp/nsemail-656.eml  /tmp/nsmail.pdf
/tmp/nsemail-362.eml  /tmp/nsemail-657.eml  /tmp/nsmail.png
/tmp/nsemail-363.eml  /tmp/nsemail-658.eml  /tmp/nsmail.tmp
/tmp/nsemail-364.eml  /tmp/nsemail-659.eml  /tmp/nsmail.zip
/tmp/nsemail-365.eml  /tmp/nsemail-65.eml
```
This is just an excerpt. There are many more, total 989 files. And that 
although I've had already cleaned them up relatively recently already.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1853007

Title:
  nsemail and nscopy files left in /tmp

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/thunderbird/+bug/1853007/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1793496] [mutter/bionic] verification still needed

2020-12-30 Thread Brian Murray
The fix for this bug has been awaiting testing feedback in the -proposed
repository for bionic for more than 90 days.  Please test this fix and
update the bug appropriately with the results.  In the event that the
fix for this bug is still not verified 15 days from now, the package
will be removed from the -proposed repository.

** Tags added: removal-candidate

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1793496

Title:
  scaling changes when closing/re-opening the lid

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/mutter/+bug/1793496/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1909689] [NEW] Upgrade from 18.04 to 20.04 failed

2020-12-30 Thread Markus Suomi
Public bug reported:

I tried to upgrade from 18.04 to 20.04 per Ubuntu instructions. Upgrade
halted at early stage "Could not calculate the upgrade" with likely
cause said to be unofficial software packages. I tried to remove with
GUI Software & Updates but that did not help. I do not know how to use
ppa-purge tool.

Description:Ubuntu 18.04.5 LTS
Release:18.04

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
Package: ubuntu-release-upgrader-core 1:18.04.41
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 
4.15.0-50201905291620.0+mediatree+hauppauge-generic 4.15.18
Uname: Linux 4.15.0-50201905291620-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.21
Architecture: amd64
CrashDB: ubuntu
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Wed Dec 30 22:20:35 2020
InstallationDate: Installed on 2018-07-17 (897 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 18.04 LTS "Bionic Beaver" - Release amd64 (20180426)
PackageArchitecture: all
SourcePackage: ubuntu-release-upgrader
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to bionic on 2020-12-30 (0 days ago)

** Affects: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug bionic dist-upgrade

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909689

Title:
  Upgrade from 18.04 to 20.04 failed

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1909689/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1806476] Re: package android-androresolvd 1.3-1build1 failed to install/upgrade: installed android-androresolvd package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

2020-12-30 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

** Changed in: android-androresolvd (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1806476

Title:
  package android-androresolvd 1.3-1build1 failed to install/upgrade:
  installed android-androresolvd package post-installation script
  subprocess returned error exit status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/android-androresolvd/+bug/1806476/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1906273] Re: iwlwifi - very slow for intel 9260/9560 wireless cards

2020-12-30 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

** Changed in: linux-firmware (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1906273

Title:
  iwlwifi - very slow for intel 9260/9560 wireless cards

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-firmware/+bug/1906273/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1902244] Re: Backport packages for 20.04.2 HWE stack

2020-12-30 Thread Timo Aaltonen
wlroots regression sorted out

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1902244

Title:
  Backport packages for 20.04.2 HWE stack

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libclc/+bug/1902244/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1903438] Re: can't upgrade to 20 from 18

2020-12-30 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1903438

Title:
  can't upgrade to 20 from 18

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1903438/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1909687] Status changed to Confirmed

2020-12-30 Thread Ubuntu Kernel Bot
This change was made by a bot.

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909687

Title:
  Cannot compile kernel using procedure at
  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/BuildYourOwnKernel

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1909687/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1909687] [NEW] Cannot compile kernel using procedure at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/BuildYourOwnKernel

2020-12-30 Thread Mark Allyn
Public bug reported:

I am trying to use the procedure to compile the kernel for ubuntu-
bionic:

https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/BuildYourOwnKernel

Here is the procedure that I tried to do:

First, uncomment all deb-src in /etc/apt/sources.list

apt-get update

apt-get upgrade

apt-get dist-upgrade

Reboot machine

Confirm version:
maallyn@li1183-111:~$ lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description:Ubuntu 18.04.5 LTS
Release:18.04
Codename:   bionic

maallyn@li1183-111:~$ uname -a
Linux li1183-111 4.15.0-128-generic #131-Ubuntu SMP Wed Dec 9 06:57:35 UTC 2020 
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

sudo apt-get build-dep linux linux-image-$(uname -r)

apt-get install libncurses-dev flex bison openssl libssl-dev dkms
libelf-dev libudev-dev libpci-dev libiberty-dev autoconf


 apt-get source linux-image-$(uname -r)  Is broken. I am 
getting permission
denied even though I am on as root.


root@li1183-111:~# apt-get source linux-image-$(uname -r)
Reading package lists... Done
Picking 'linux-signed' as source package instead of 
'linux-image-4.15.0-128-generic'
Need to get 19.8 kB of source archives.
Get:1 http://mirrors.linode.com/ubuntu bionic-updates/main linux-signed 
4.15.0-128.131 (dsc) [2,103 B]
Get:2 http://mirrors.linode.com/ubuntu bionic-updates/main linux-signed 
4.15.0-128.131 (tar) [17.7 kB]
Fetched 19.8 kB in 0s (1,805 kB/s)
dpkg-source: info: extracting linux-signed in linux-signed-4.15.0
dpkg-source: info: unpacking linux-signed_4.15.0-128.131.tar.xz
W: Download is performed unsandboxed as root as file 
'linux-signed_4.15.0-128.131.dsc' couldn't be accessed by user '_apt'. - 
pkgAcquire::Run (13: Permission denied)

##
#

Now trying git clone method

git clone git://kernel.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ubuntu-bionic.git

This seems to work okay . . .
maallyn@li1183-111:~$ git clone git://kernel.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ubuntu-bionic.git
Cloning into 'ubuntu-bionic'...
remote: Counting objects: 7717929, done.
remote: Compressing objects: 100% (1127512/1127512), done.
Receiving objects: 100% (7717929/7717929), 1.70 GiB | 18.82 MiB/s, done.
remote: Total 7717929 (delta 6543888), reused 7715758 (delta 6541783)
Resolving deltas: 100% (6543888/6543888), done.
Checking out files: 100% (63373/63373), done.


Now, trying to do the fakeroot, come to find that the procedure
did not include apt-get install fakeroot

Now the prep to do the configures seem to be okay

Now, added allyn1 to version by changing the first line of 
debian.master/changelog:
linux (4.15.0-126.129-allyn1) bionic; urgency=medium

Change config to remove Nouveau (NVIDIA) cards from configuration
so that I can use the propriatary NVIDIA drivers

Changed only amd64 and amd64 lowlatency, but did not change others


---
LANG=C fakeroot debian/rules binary-headers binary-generic binary-perarch

I have made the entire output of the console available at: www.allyn.com
/build-attempt.txt

I have also made the entire (uncompiled) source tree available at:
www.allyn.com/ubuntu-bionic.tar

I can be contacted at markallyn...@gmail.com and my account at ubuntu is
maallyn123

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
Package: linux-image-4.15.0-128-generic 4.15.0-128.131
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-128.131-generic 4.15.18
Uname: Linux 4.15.0-128-generic x86_64
AlsaDevices:
 total 0
 crw-rw 1 root audio 116,  1 Dec 30 17:06 seq
 crw-rw 1 root audio 116, 33 Dec 30 17:06 timer
AplayDevices: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'aplay': 'aplay'
ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.21
Architecture: amd64
ArecordDevices: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'arecord': 'arecord'
AudioDevicesInUse: Error: command ['fuser', '-v', '/dev/snd/seq', 
'/dev/snd/timer'] failed with exit code 1:
Date: Wed Dec 30 18:54:36 2020
InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-09-28 (92 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Server 18.04.5 LTS "Bionic Beaver" - Release amd64 
(20200810)
IwConfig: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'iwconfig': 'iwconfig'
Lsusb: Error: command ['lsusb'] failed with exit code 1:
MachineType: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)
PciMultimedia:
 
ProcFB: 0 bochsdrmfb
ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-4.15.0-128-generic root=/dev/sda ro 
console=ttyS0,19200n8 net.ifnames=0
RelatedPackageVersions:
 linux-restricted-modules-4.15.0-128-generic N/A
 linux-backports-modules-4.15.0-128-generic  N/A
 linux-firmware  1.173.19
RfKill: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'rfkill': 'rfkill'
SourcePackage: linux
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
WifiSyslog:
 
dmi.bios.date: 04/01/2014
dmi.bios.vendor: SeaBIOS
dmi.bios.version: rel-1.12.0-0-ga698c8995f-prebuilt.qemu.org
dmi.chassis.type: 1
dmi.chassis.vendor: QEMU
dmi.chassis.version: pc-q35-3.1
dmi.modalias: 

[Bug 1902244] Re: Backport packages for 20.04.2 HWE stack

2020-12-30 Thread Timo Aaltonen
** Description changed:

  [Impact]
  
  These are needed for 20.04.2 images.
  
  [Test case]
  
  Boot a daily image, see that it still has the necessary stack installed
  and working.
  
- Check upgrade from stock bionic.
+ Check upgrade from stock focal.
  
  [Regression potential]
  
  libdrm: very minimal chance for regressions
  
  llvm-11: a new package, no regression potential on it's own
  
  libclc: just a rebuild against the new llvm
  
  libglvnd: mostly just EGL headers sync from Khronos, needed by mesa
  
  mesa: a new major release, but we'll pull the final stable release of
  20.2.x series, so there shouldn't be any regressions left at that point
  
  xserver: a new point-release
  
  xorg drivers: modest updates, if any

** Description changed:

  [Impact]
  
  These are needed for 20.04.2 images.
  
  [Test case]
  
  Boot a daily image, see that it still has the necessary stack installed
  and working.
  
  Check upgrade from stock focal.
  
  [Regression potential]
  
  libdrm: very minimal chance for regressions
  
  llvm-11: a new package, no regression potential on it's own
  
  libclc: just a rebuild against the new llvm
  
  libglvnd: mostly just EGL headers sync from Khronos, needed by mesa
  
  mesa: a new major release, but we'll pull the final stable release of
  20.2.x series, so there shouldn't be any regressions left at that point
  
  xserver: a new point-release
- 
- xorg drivers: modest updates, if any

** Description changed:

  [Impact]
  
  These are needed for 20.04.2 images.
  
  [Test case]
  
  Boot a daily image, see that it still has the necessary stack installed
  and working.
- 
- Check upgrade from stock focal.
  
  [Regression potential]
  
  libdrm: very minimal chance for regressions
  
  llvm-11: a new package, no regression potential on it's own
  
  libclc: just a rebuild against the new llvm
  
  libglvnd: mostly just EGL headers sync from Khronos, needed by mesa
  
  mesa: a new major release, but we'll pull the final stable release of
  20.2.x series, so there shouldn't be any regressions left at that point
  
  xserver: a new point-release

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1902244

Title:
  Backport packages for 20.04.2 HWE stack

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libclc/+bug/1902244/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1908992] Re: SYNA30B4:00 06CB:CE09 Mouse on HP EliteBook 850 G7 not working at all

2020-12-30 Thread Leon Workman
Exact same system model and Synaptics device.  We're interested in getting the 
top two physical buttons working.  xev does not even register anything when the 
buttons are pressed.
List of things attempted:

1.
xserver-xorg-input-synaptics breaks the touchpad altogether when installed, 
under-touchpad ones no longer register a central button 2.

With xserver-xorg-input-synaptics installed and x.org using, "Using
input driver 'synaptics' for 'SYNA30B4:00 06CB:CE09 Touchpad'",

⎡ Virtual core pointer id=2 [master pointer (3)]
⎜ ↳ Virtual core XTEST pointer id=4 [slave pointer (2)]
⎜ ↳ SYNA30B4:00 06CB:CE09 Mouse id=12 [slave pointer (2)]
⎜ ↳ SYNA30B4:00 06CB:CE09 Touchpad id=13 [slave pointer (2)]
⎜ ↳ Kensington Kensington Expert Mouse id=14 [slave pointer (2)]
⎜ ↳ HID 0566:3013 Consumer Control id=16 [slave pointer (2)]
⎜ ↳ Generic USB Audio Consumer Control id=19 [slave pointer (2)]
⎜ ↳ Generic USB Audio Consumer Control id=21 [slave pointer (2)]
⎣ Virtual core keyboard id=3 [master keyboard (2)]
↳ Virtual core XTEST keyboard id=5 [slave keyboard (3)]
↳ Power Button id=6 [slave keyboard (3)]
↳ Video Bus id=7 [slave keyboard (3)]
↳ Power Button id=8 [slave keyboard (3)]
↳ Sleep Button id=9 [slave keyboard (3)]
↳ HP HD Camera: HP HD Camera id=10 [slave keyboard (3)]
↳ HP HD Camera: HP IR Camera id=11 [slave keyboard (3)]
↳ HID 0566:3013 id=15 [slave keyboard (3)]
↳ HID 0566:3013 System Control id=17 [slave keyboard (3)]
↳ HID 0566:3013 id=18 [slave keyboard (3)]
↳ Generic USB Audio id=20 [slave keyboard (3)]
↳ Generic USB Audio id=22 [slave keyboard (3)]
↳ Intel HID events id=23 [slave keyboard (3)]
↳ Intel HID 5 button array id=24 [slave keyboard (3)]
↳ AT Translated Set 2 keyboard id=25 [slave keyboard (3)]
↳ HP Wireless hotkeys id=26 [slave keyboard (3)]
↳ HP WMI hotkeys id=27 [slave keyboard (3)]
↳ HID 0566:3013 Consumer Control id=28 [slave keyboard (3)]
↳ Generic USB Audio Consumer Control id=29 [slave keyboard (3)]
↳ Generic USB Audio Consumer Control id=30 [slave keyboard (3)]

Using input driver 'libinput' for 'SYNA30B4:00 06CB:CE09 Touchpad'",

⎡ Virtual core pointer id=2 [master pointer (3)]
⎜ ↳ Virtual core XTEST pointer id=4 [slave pointer (2)]
⎜ ↳ KEYBOARD Consumer Control id=11 [slave pointer (2)]
⎜ ↳ HID 0566:3013 Consumer Control id=14 [slave pointer (2)]
⎜ ↳ SYNA30B4:00 06CB:CE09 Mouse id=19 [slave pointer (2)]
⎜ ↳ SYNA30B4:00 06CB:CE09 Touchpad id=20 [slave pointer (2)]
⎜ ↳ Kensington Kensington Expert Mouse id=21 [slave pointer (2)]
⎜ ↳ Generic USB Audio Consumer Control id=22 [slave pointer (2)]
⎜ ↳ Generic USB Audio Consumer Control id=24 [slave pointer (2)]
⎣ Virtual core keyboard id=3 [master keyboard (2)]
↳ Virtual core XTEST keyboard id=5 [slave keyboard (3)]
↳ Power Button id=6 [slave keyboard (3)]
↳ Video Bus id=7 [slave keyboard (3)]
↳ Power Button id=8 [slave keyboard (3)]
↳ Sleep Button id=9 [slave keyboard (3)]
↳ KEYBOARD id=10 [slave keyboard (3)]
↳ KEYBOARD System Control id=12 [slave keyboard (3)]
↳ HID 0566:3013 id=13 [slave keyboard (3)]
↳ HID 0566:3013 System Control id=15 [slave keyboard (3)]
↳ HID 0566:3013 id=16 [slave keyboard (3)]
↳ HP HD Camera: HP HD Camera id=17 [slave keyboard (3)]
↳ HP HD Camera: HP IR Camera id=18 [slave keyboard (3)]
↳ Generic USB Audio id=23 [slave keyboard (3)]
↳ Generic USB Audio id=25 [slave keyboard (3)]
↳ Intel HID events id=26 [slave keyboard (3)]
↳ Intel HID 5 button array id=27 [slave keyboard (3)]
↳ AT Translated Set 2 keyboard id=28 [slave keyboard (3)]
↳ HP Wireless hotkeys id=29 [slave keyboard (3)]
↳ HP WMI hotkeys id=30 [slave keyboard (3)]
↳ KEYBOARD Consumer Control id=31 [slave keyboard (3)]
↳ HID 0566:3013 Consumer Control id=32 [slave keyboard (3)]
↳ Generic USB Audio Consumer Control id=33 [slave keyboard (3)]
↳ Generic USB Audio Consumer Control id=34 [slave keyboard (3)]

2.
sudo rmmod i2c_hid
sudo modprobe i2c_hid
No change in behavior.

3.
blacklisting of driver provided no relief.
sudo vi /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist.conf (likely a new file)

install i2c_hid /bin/true

Then, update initramfs and reboot...

sudo update-initramfs -u
sudo reboot

4.
Reinstall of xserver-xorg-input-libinput provided no relief.

5.
Back to original config
original configuration (no synaptics or blacklist, all 3 buttons working in 
touchpad), it appears as two devices --

Device 'SYNA30B4:00 06CB:CE09 Mouse':
Device Enabled (174): 1
Coordinate Transformation Matrix (176): 1.00, 0.00, 0.00, 0.00, 
1.00, 0.00, 0.00, 0.00, 1.00
libinput Natural Scrolling Enabled (309): 0
libinput Natural Scrolling Enabled Default (310): 0
libinput Scroll Methods Available (311): 0, 0, 1
libinput Scroll Method Enabled (312): 0, 0, 1
libinput Scroll Method Enabled Default (313): 0, 0, 1
libinput Button Scrolling Button (314): 2
libinput Button Scrolling Button Default (315): 2
libinput Middle Emulation Enabled (316): 0
libinput Middle Emulation Enabled Default (317): 0
libinput Accel Speed (318): 0.00
libinput Accel Speed 

[Bug 1908992] Re: SYNA30B4:00 06CB:CE09 Mouse on HP EliteBook 850 G7 not working at all

2020-12-30 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

** Changed in: xserver-xorg-input-libinput (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1908992

Title:
  SYNA30B4:00 06CB:CE09 Mouse  on HP EliteBook 850 G7 not working at all

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-input-libinput/+bug/1908992/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1907302] Re: package phpmyadmin 4:4.9.5+dfsg1-2 failed to install/upgrade: installed phpmyadmin package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

2020-12-30 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

** Changed in: phpmyadmin (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1907302

Title:
  package phpmyadmin 4:4.9.5+dfsg1-2 failed to install/upgrade:
  installed phpmyadmin package post-installation script subprocess
  returned error exit status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/phpmyadmin/+bug/1907302/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1909685] [NEW] Bug #1801453

2020-12-30 Thread Alberto Pro
Public bug reported:

No se ha podido calcular la actualización

Se produjo un problema irresoluble al calcular la actualización.

 Esto podría deberse a:
 * Paquetes de software no oficiales, no proporcionados por Ubuntu
Utilice la herramienta «ppa-purge» desde el paquete 
ppa-purge para quitar software de una PPA de Launchpad PPA e 
intente actualizar de nuevo.

Si nada de esto es aplicable, entonces informe de este error usando el
comando «ubuntu-bug ubuntu-release-upgrader-core» en una terminal. Si
quiere investigar el problema por su cuenta, los registros en «/var/log
/dist-upgrade» contienen detalles de la actualización; en particular,
consulte «main.log» y «apt.log».

He usado ya ppa-purge, pero sigue el mismo mensaje

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
Package: ubuntu-release-upgrader-core 1:18.04.41
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-58.64~18.04.1-generic 5.4.73
Uname: Linux 5.4.0-58-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.21
Architecture: amd64
CrashDB: ubuntu
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Wed Dec 30 18:24:23 2020
InstallationDate: Installed on 2019-11-12 (414 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 18.04.3 LTS "Bionic Beaver" - Release amd64 (20190805)
PackageArchitecture: all
SourcePackage: ubuntu-release-upgrader
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to bionic on 2020-12-30 (0 days ago)
VarLogDistupgradeTermlog:

** Affects: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug bionic dist-upgrade third-party-packages

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909685

Title:
   Bug #1801453

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1909685/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1881191] Re: Lubuntu 20.04 installation does not add swap partition

2020-12-30 Thread Dan Simmons
The Calamares portion of this issue has been released. The settings
portion is still pending. This issue can also be tracked on Lubuntu's
phabricator https://phab.lubuntu.me/T22

** Changed in: calamares (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

** Changed in: calamares (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => Medium

** Bug watch added: Calamares Issues #1166
   https://github.com/calamares/calamares/issues/1166

** Also affects: calamares via
   https://github.com/calamares/calamares/issues/1166
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

** Changed in: calamares (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Fix Released

** Also affects: calamares-settings-ubuntu (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: calamares-settings-ubuntu (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

** Changed in: calamares-settings-ubuntu (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => Medium

** Changed in: calamares-settings-ubuntu (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Dan Simmons (kc2bez)

** Changed in: calamares-settings-ubuntu (Ubuntu)
Milestone: None => ubuntu-21.04

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1881191

Title:
  Lubuntu 20.04 installation does not add swap partition

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/calamares/+bug/1881191/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 402892] Re: Mouse cursor gets stuck in "drag and drop" mode

2020-12-30 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Happens very frequently for me on a default ubuntu 20.10 desktop. I
basically have to kill my desktop to fix it, and lose all unsaved work.
It's quite problematic.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/402892

Title:
  Mouse cursor gets stuck in "drag and drop" mode

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/openshot/+bug/402892/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1909683] [NEW] WARNING: unhandled amd64-linux syscall: 315

2020-12-30 Thread Giuseppe D'Angelo
Public bug reported:

Hi,

Valgrind shipped with focal does not support the sched_getattr and
sched_setattr syscalls, resulting in output like

--1234-- WARNING: unhandled amd64-linux syscall: 315
--1234-- You may be able to write your own handler.
--1234-- Read the file README_MISSING_SYSCALL_OR_IOCTL.
--1234-- Nevertheless we consider this a bug.  Please report
--1234-- it at http://valgrind.org/support/bug_reports.html.

This has been fixed upstream in the meanwhile.

Could it be possible to cherry pick
6323fd5bfd94c3f80e2ff44f16488e0172bd9a96 into valgrind shipped with
focal? Lots of applications make use of those syscalls.


Commit: 
https://sourceware.org/git/?p=valgrind.git;a=commit;h=6323fd5bfd94c3f80e2ff44f16488e0172bd9a96
Upstream bug report: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=369029

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
Package: valgrind 1:3.15.0-1ubuntu9.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-58.64-generic 5.4.73
Uname: Linux 5.4.0-58-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.14
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Wed Dec 30 17:54:26 2020
InstallationDate: Installed on 2016-04-22 (1713 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.04 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release amd64 (20160420.1)
SourcePackage: valgrind
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to focal on 2020-12-27 (3 days ago)

** Affects: valgrind (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug focal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909683

Title:
  WARNING: unhandled amd64-linux syscall: 315

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/valgrind/+bug/1909683/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1909680] Re: Ubuntu 20.10 Desktop on Pi4B - random X server crashes

2020-12-30 Thread Juliane
A fresh Xorg.0.log.old after such a crash is given as attachment. I
changed some stuff like mac-address, but all relevant details are kept
original.

It is full of "Logitech USB Optical Mouse/Keyboard: client bug: event
processing lagging behind" messages.

** Attachment added: "Xorg.0.log.old"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-raspi/+bug/1909680/+attachment/5448076/+files/Xorg.0.log.old

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909680

Title:
  Ubuntu 20.10 Desktop on Pi4B - random X server crashes

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-raspi/+bug/1909680/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1909682] [NEW] At package doesn't include sendmail package dependency

2020-12-30 Thread Saverio Miroddi
Public bug reported:

The `at` program uses the local mail in order to report errors,
specifically, it requires the `sendmail` binary.

Without `sendmail`, any error during a job execution is reported in the
syslog with a very confusing reference to a missing "mail" program.

I suppose that error diagnosis is a requirement in job scheduling,
therefore, the `sendmail` package should be required by the `at`
package.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
Package: at (not installed)
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-39.43-generic 5.4.41
Uname: Linux 5.4.0-39-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.3
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
CurrentDesktop: MATE
Date: Wed Dec 30 17:41:51 2020
InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-07-01 (182 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-MATE 20.04 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 
(20200423)
SourcePackage: at
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: at (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug focal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909682

Title:
  At package doesn't include sendmail package dependency

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/at/+bug/1909682/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1882410] Re: toggling down object GInotifyFileMonitor that's already queued to toggle up ... GNOME Shell crashed with signal 5

2020-12-30 Thread Dario Petrillo
I would like to confirm that this bug happens to me as well on Ubuntu
20.04.1.

I've been able to reproduce it consistently when downloading two or more big 
(1GB+) files at the same time from google drive on chrome to the Desktop folder.
Downloading the files one at a time or to a different folder doesn't seem to 
trigger the bug, at least for me

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1882410

Title:
  toggling down object GInotifyFileMonitor that's already queued to
  toggle up ... GNOME Shell crashed with signal 5

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gjs/+bug/1882410/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1899011] Re: Multiple maintainer

2020-12-30 Thread Ishrak
** Changed in: gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock (Ubuntu)
   Status: Expired => Invalid

** Information type changed from Public to Private

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1899011

Title:
  Multiple maintainer

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock/+bug/1899011/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1909680] [NEW] Ubuntu 20.10 Desktop on Pi4B - random X server crashes

2020-12-30 Thread Juliane
Public bug reported:

My system:
Linux myRaspi 5.8.0-1010-raspi #13-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT Wed Dec 9 17:14:07 UTC 
2020 aarch64 aarch64 aarch64 GNU/Linux

I'm using
- Raspberry Pi4B 8GB
- Logitech MK120 Keyboard and Mouse (wired)

I'm using Ubuntu 20.10 Desktop and get random crashes in both of my desktops, 
ubuntu and lxqt. After 1 or 2 hours (often during CPU/GPU-heavy work like using 
Firefox), the system freezes, which means:
- Screen freezes (just shows the same picture. mouse-cursor not moving, 
keyboard not working)
- Keyboard not responding (e.g. Num-LED not changing when pressing Num)
- Changing to another tty via e.g. Ctrl+Alt+F3 is not working anymore
- BUT: System in the background still works. I can still hear audio (of a movie 
for example). Other tasks like ffmpeg-downloads are still working.

During a freeze, Alt+SysRq+k isn't changing much. I can hear the audio 
stopping. But the system is "too frozen" to be able to kill the X server. I 
also tried killing it via ssh - no chance. Alt+SysRq+reisub works to do a 
Pi-restart.
These freezes occur during typing, during clicking, but also when doing nothing 
with mouse and keyboard (like watching a video).

A journalctl-log of the freeze (occurred at 00:08:something when typing
with my keyboard) during ubuntu-desktop session is given here (I tried
Alt+SysRq+k at 00:10:something without success):

[...]
Dez 26 00:07:31 myRaspi gnome-shell[166054]: JS ERROR: TypeError: windowActor 
is null
 
_addWindowEffect@resource:///org/gnome/shell/ui/closeDialog.js:90:28
 
vfunc_show@resource:///org/gnome/shell/ui/closeDialog.js:162:14
Dez 26 00:07:36 myRaspi gnome-shell[166054]: JS ERROR: TypeError: windowActor 
is null
 
_addWindowEffect@resource:///org/gnome/shell/ui/closeDialog.js:90:28
 
vfunc_show@resource:///org/gnome/shell/ui/closeDialog.js:162:14
Dez 26 00:07:41 myRaspi gnome-shell[166054]: JS ERROR: TypeError: windowActor 
is null
 
_addWindowEffect@resource:///org/gnome/shell/ui/closeDialog.js:90:28
 
vfunc_show@resource:///org/gnome/shell/ui/closeDialog.js:162:14
Dez 26 00:07:46 myRaspi gnome-shell[166054]: JS ERROR: TypeError: windowActor 
is null
 
_addWindowEffect@resource:///org/gnome/shell/ui/closeDialog.js:90:28
 
vfunc_show@resource:///org/gnome/shell/ui/closeDialog.js:162:14
Dez 26 00:07:48 myRaspi dbus-daemon[4131]: [session uid=1000 pid=4131] 
Activating via systemd: service name='org.freedesktop.Tracker1' 
unit='tracker-store.service' requested by ':1.2' (uid=1000 pid=4128 
comm="/usr/libexec/tracker-miner-fs " label="unconfined")
Dez 26 00:07:48 myRaspi systemd[4119]: Starting Tracker metadata database store 
and lookup manager...
Dez 26 00:07:48 myRaspi dbus-daemon[4131]: [session uid=1000 pid=4131] 
Successfully activated service 'org.freedesktop.Tracker1'
Dez 26 00:07:48 myRaspi systemd[4119]: Started Tracker metadata database store 
and lookup manager.
Dez 26 00:07:49 myRaspi dbus-daemon[4131]: [session uid=1000 pid=4131] 
Activating via systemd: service name='org.freedesktop.Tracker1.Miner.Extract' 
unit='tracker-extract.service' requested by ':1.2' (uid=1000 pid=4128 
comm="/usr/libexec/tracker-miner-fs " label="unconfined")
Dez 26 00:07:49 myRaspi systemd[4119]: Starting Tracker metadata extractor...
Dez 26 00:07:49 myRaspi tracker-extract[179165]: Set scheduler policy to 
SCHED_IDLE
Dez 26 00:07:49 myRaspi tracker-extract[179165]: Setting priority nice level to 
19
Dez 26 00:07:49 myRaspi dbus-daemon[4131]: [session uid=1000 pid=4131] 
Successfully activated service 'org.freedesktop.Tracker1.Miner.Extract'
Dez 26 00:07:49 myRaspi systemd[4119]: Started Tracker metadata extractor.
Dez 26 00:07:51 myRaspi gnome-shell[166054]: JS ERROR: TypeError: windowActor 
is null
 
_addWindowEffect@resource:///org/gnome/shell/ui/closeDialog.js:90:28
 
vfunc_show@resource:///org/gnome/shell/ui/closeDialog.js:162:14
Dez 26 00:08:00 myRaspi systemd[4119]: tracker-extract.service: Succeeded.
Dez 26 00:08:01 myRaspi gnome-shell[166054]: JS ERROR: TypeError: windowActor 
is null
 
_addWindowEffect@resource:///org/gnome/shell/ui/closeDialog.js:90:28
 
vfunc_show@resource:///org/gnome/shell/ui/closeDialog.js:162:14
Dez 26 00:08:06 myRaspi gnome-shell[166054]: JS ERROR: TypeError: windowActor 
is null
 
_addWindowEffect@resource:///org/gnome/shell/ui/closeDialog.js:90:28
 

[Bug 1896091] Re: [i915] Noise-like lines of graphics corruption when moving windows in Xorg sessions

2020-12-30 Thread rud
I have a similar issue with Core i3-9100 desktop (Ubuntu 20.10 clean install) 
and a HP Probook 430 G6 (Core i5-82xx). 
Example:
https://aws1.discourse-cdn.com/standard17/uploads/ubuntubudgie/original/2X/1/1f3f03e248964bc470caf7748cf7d8aa424474fc.jpeg

Might be the same as:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mutter/+bug/1896627
because on the laptop, it mostly (but not only) happens when I use the touchpad 
or mouse and gets even worse when I scroll very slow.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1896091

Title:
  [i915] Noise-like lines of graphics corruption when moving windows in
  Xorg sessions

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1896091/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1896627] Re: Windows flicker when being resized with the mouse (Xorg sessions in groovy)

2020-12-30 Thread rud
Similar issue with a photo of the flickering: 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1896091/comments/64

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1896627

Title:
  Windows flicker when being resized with the mouse (Xorg sessions in
  groovy)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-shell/+bug/1896627/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1909678] Re: Ubuntu 20.10 Desktop on Pi4B - x-server crash when idling at login-screen

2020-12-30 Thread Juliane
** Package changed: ubuntu => linux-raspi (Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909678

Title:
  Ubuntu 20.10 Desktop on Pi4B - x-server crash when idling at login-
  screen

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-raspi/+bug/1909678/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1909678] [NEW] Ubuntu 20.10 Desktop on Pi4B - x-server crash when idling at login-screen

2020-12-30 Thread Juliane
Public bug reported:

It is the same bug already described here:
https://askubuntu.com/questions/1300689/problem-with-usb-keyboard-and-
mouse-on-raspberry-pi-4b-with-ubuntu-20-10

My system:
Linux myRaspi 5.8.0-1010-raspi #13-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT Wed Dec 9 17:14:07 UTC 
2020 aarch64 aarch64 aarch64 GNU/Linux

I'm using 
- Raspberry Pi4B 8GB
- Logitech MK120 Keyboard and Mouse (wired).

How I could reproduce the mentioned crash:
- Boot and wait (don't touch mouse/keyboard) at login-screen for five minutes
- After five minutes, screen will turn black
- If you move the mouse then, screen will be back again but frozen 
(mouse/keyboard not working). x server will be crashed.

restarting x-server via ssh or via Alt+SysRq+k is possible

** Affects: ubuntu
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: crash freeze login-screen x-server

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909678

Title:
  Ubuntu 20.10 Desktop on Pi4B - x-server crash when idling at login-
  screen

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1909678/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1909677] [NEW] package grub-efi-amd64-signed 1.155.1+2.04-1ubuntu35.1 failed to install/upgrade: installed grub-efi-amd64-signed package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit st

2020-12-30 Thread DAWOOD SUBEDAR
Public bug reported:

Eroor in ubuntu install. Tried several times and got same error

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.10
Package: grub-efi-amd64-signed 1.155.1+2.04-1ubuntu35.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.8.0-33.36-generic 5.8.17
Uname: Linux 5.8.0-33-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu50.3
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
Date: Wed Dec 30 10:11:41 2020
ErrorMessage: installed grub-efi-amd64-signed package post-installation script 
subprocess returned error exit status 1
InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-12-30 (0 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.10 "Groovy Gorilla" - Release amd64 (20201022)
Python3Details: /usr/bin/python3.8, Python 3.8.6, python3-minimal, 
3.8.6-0ubuntu1
PythonDetails: N/A
RelatedPackageVersions:
 dpkg 1.20.5ubuntu2
 apt  2.1.10ubuntu0.1
SourcePackage: grub2-signed
Title: package grub-efi-amd64-signed 1.155.1+2.04-1ubuntu35.1 failed to 
install/upgrade: installed grub-efi-amd64-signed package post-installation 
script subprocess returned error exit status 1
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: grub2-signed (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-package groovy

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909677

Title:
  package grub-efi-amd64-signed 1.155.1+2.04-1ubuntu35.1 failed to
  install/upgrade: installed grub-efi-amd64-signed package post-
  installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2-signed/+bug/1909677/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1909677] Re: package grub-efi-amd64-signed 1.155.1+2.04-1ubuntu35.1 failed to install/upgrade: installed grub-efi-amd64-signed package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit stat

2020-12-30 Thread Apport retracing service
** Tags removed: need-duplicate-check

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909677

Title:
  package grub-efi-amd64-signed 1.155.1+2.04-1ubuntu35.1 failed to
  install/upgrade: installed grub-efi-amd64-signed package post-
  installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2-signed/+bug/1909677/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1909673] [NEW] Installation failed to create boot entry

2020-12-30 Thread Muhammad Atif Ali
Public bug reported:

Installation failed to create boot entry
grub failed to install in the EFI partition that already has Windows Boot Loader

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
Package: ubiquity 20.04.15
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-26.30-generic 5.4.30
Uname: Linux 5.4.0-26-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: zfs zunicode zavl icp zcommon znvpair
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
CasperVersion: 1.445
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Wed Dec 30 20:01:53 2020
InstallCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/casper/vmlinuz file=/cdrom/preseed/ubuntu.seed 
maybe-ubiquity quiet splash ---
LiveMediaBuild: Ubuntu 20.04 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20200423)
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=en_US.UTF-8
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 LC_NUMERIC=C.UTF-8
SourcePackage: grub-installer
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: grub-installer (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug focal ubiquity-20.04.15 ubuntu

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909673

Title:
  Installation failed to create boot entry

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub-installer/+bug/1909673/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

  1   2   >