** Description changed:
If the Hexchat window is not in focus, Hexchat will display a
notification with the name of the Hexchat window in quotes and 'is
ready' (eg, '"Avital_ @ freenode / ##linux - Hexchat" is ready') for
- every message received in the channel that is currently selected.
Public bug reported:
If the Hexchat window is not in focus, Hexchat will display a
notification with the name of the Hexchat window in quotes and 'is
ready' (eg, '"Avital_ @ freenode / ##linux - Hexchat" is ready') for
every message received in the channel that is currently selected. If it
is a
Thanks! Taking a glance at the log it looks as if there have been a
couple of Firefox updates (to version 74.0 then 75.0) which would more
likely be causing your networking issues. Reinstalling would certainly
be worth a try.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Could you provide the apt log as well as the specific error you're
getting from Firefox? If you try downgrading the libgd2 binary packages,
does something change?
** Also affects: firefox (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: libgd2 (Ubuntu)
Status: New =>
I reviewed python-sqlalchemy-utils 0.36.1-0ubuntu2 as checked into groovy.
This shouldn't be
considered a full audit but rather a quick gauge of maintainability.
python-sqlalchemy-utils is a python package providing additional data
types and utility functions for SQLAlchemy.
- CVE History:
-
** CVE added: https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2019-20373
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public Security
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1839431
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public Security
** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1896722
Title:
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public Security
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1896416
Title:
screen locking no longer works
To manage notifications about this
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
** Description changed:
https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-24977
Upstream patch:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libxml2/-/commit/8e7c20a1af8776677d7890f30b7a180567701a49
+
+ GNOME project libxml2 v2.9.10 and earlier have a global buffer over-read
+ vulnerability in
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
** Description changed:
+ GNOME project libxml2 v2.9.10 and earlier have a global buffer over-read
+ vulnerability in xmlEncodeEntitiesInternal at libxml2/entities.c.
+
https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-24977
- Upstream patch:
-
** Also affects: gnome-shell (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1896416
Title:
screen locking no longer works
To manage
Hello,
In AlsaInfo.txt, under `!!Amixer output`, the Master and Headphone audio
output controls are set to off, a possible starting point for debugging
this issue may be looking into trying to unset those. The file contents
are just writing the output of `/usr/sbin/alsa-info.sh --stdout --no-
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public Security
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1884738
Title:
Pulseaudio in Ubuntu 16.04 contains a potential double-free bug in
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public Security
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1895928
Title:
Snap policy module fails to identify snaps if SCM_CREDENTIALS are
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public Security
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1883840
Title:
Double free in DCCP module causing kernel panic
To manage
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
Public bug reported:
The acl package is not shipped by default in the Focal server image (though it
looks like libacl1 is still being shipped), it was last shipped in the Bionic
server image. Just to double check, was dropping acl intentional? It is a
reverse-dependency of LXD if that might be
I reviewed python-aws-requests-auth 0.4.3-2 as checked into impish. This
shouldn't be considered a full audit but rather a quick gauge of
maintainability.
python-aws-requests-auth is a python package for manually signing AWS
requests with additional functionality to retrieve AWS credentials via
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1934022 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1934022
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1934022
Crashed towards the end of installing
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
** Attachment removed: "IpAddr.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thunderbird/+bug/1935074/+attachment/5509959/+files/IpAddr.txt
** Attachment removed: "IpRoute.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thunderbird/+bug/1935074/+attachment/5509960/+files/IpRoute.txt
--
** Changed in: distro-info (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1925383
Title:
No-change rebuild in xenial
To manage notifications
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
** Changed in: openjdk-8 (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
** Changed in: openjdk-lts (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
** Changed in: openjdk-8 (Ubuntu Xenial)
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
** Changed in: openjdk-8 (Ubuntu Bionic)
Status:
Thank you for the debdiffs, all the golang-1.14 diffs built without
issue. Both the patched golang-1.10 builds failed due to
matryoshka_test.go, which is no longer present in golang-1.14:
2021/02/10 01:34:37 cgi: copy error: write tcp
127.0.0.1:39673->127.0.0.1:41144: write: broken pipe
---
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public Security
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1914228
Title:
the indicator light of the shift key works correctly but the change
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public Security
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1913976
Title:
so broken is practically useless
To manage notifications about
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1920593 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1920593
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1920593
package openjdk-8-jre:amd64 8u282-b08-0ubuntu1~16.04 failed to
install/upgrade: problemas de dependência - deixando desconfigurado
** Information
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1920593 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1920593
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1920593
package openjdk-8-jre:amd64 8u282-b08-0ubuntu1~16.04 failed to
install/upgrade: problemas de dependência - deixando desconfigurado
** Information
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
Thank you for reporting this issue. Have you reported this to the upstream
libwebp developers? If not, we encourage you to report it (you can do so here:
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/webp/issues/list) and keep us in the loop if
possible.
Thank you
** Information type changed from Private
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
Thank you for using Ubuntu and taking the time to report a bug. Your
report should contain, at a minimum, the following information so we can
better find the source of the bug and work to resolve it.
Submitting the bug about the proper source package is essential. For
help see
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
Apologies for the delay on this, it fell off our radar but we're working
on the Focal+ updates now. And no need for the separate Groovy debdiff,
thanks Brian!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Thank you so much Dariusz! All the smoke tests look good as well so it's
ready to push out Monday.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1914372
Title:
Ubuntu packages affected by
The patched update is now uploaded to the security proposed PPA here:
https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-security-proposed/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/ (Hirsute
is still building ATM)
If anyone has the time to help test any of the packages before they're uploaded
to the archive, it would be appreciated :)
** Changed in: wolfssl (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1914474
Title:
wolfssl: Please update 20.10 (groovy) to version 4.6.0
To manage
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. Your bug report is more likely to get attention if it is made in
English, since this is the language understood by the majority of Ubuntu
developers. Additionally, please only mark a bug as "security" if it
shows
*** This bug is a security vulnerability ***
Public security bug reported:
This bug is for tracking of an unspecified issue affecting the direct
buffering of characters on the jdk/ module in openjdk-8 and openjdk-lts.
It will be addressed in a future update.
Other, non-security changes in the
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
** Attachment removed: "image.png"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-session/+bug/1913781/+attachment/5460723/+files/image.png
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1913781
Thanks for following up, Magdalena. This is not a bug, but rather expected
behavior:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/Policies#Home_Directory_Access
Please feel free to report any other bugs you may find.
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public
** Changed in:
Public bug reported:
Hello,
The functionality of ubuntu-system-service has been replaced with the
systemd package. It is no longer used as part of the default install and
does not have any rdepends in the archive.
Would it be possible to remove ubuntu-system-service from the
development
Public bug reported:
distro-info-data isn't installable from the security pocket in xenial
without the updates pocket enabled. Perform a no-change rebuild of
distro-info in the security pocket to address this.
** Affects: distro-info (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Avital
92 matches
Mail list logo
