well, windoze has nothing to do with that.
removing windows destroys systems because
they use worse filesystems.
what you are decribing is just probability.
no one needs windoze, believe me.
C
Am 25.09.2010 11:59, schrieb Blue Print:
well i reinstalled vista (although i hate it, i need it for
Work around from post #14 is already working properly.
Is this now really a fix that future kernel module compilations won't fail?
If this is what you mean I will test and report and set back my system
to the faulty one before I used the post #14.
Am 21.09.2010 18:04, schrieb Martin Pitt:
It works perfectly!
Am 21.09.2010 19:34, schrieb Martin Pitt:
Catanius [2010-09-21 17:23 -]:
Is this now really a fix that future kernel module compilations won't fail?
Right, it is.
If this is what you mean I will test and report and set back my system
to the faulty
who helped on that fix did a great and fast job.
What about a donation to them?
Catanius
Am 22.09.2010 14:37, schrieb FriedChicken:
@Lumenary
Anybody here from the Ubuntu X-Swat PPA have an update on 8.771? The last
check-in for this version is still listed
as
0ubuntu0sarvatt
the best is a usb startmedia done with another ubuntu or unetbootin.
is there a wecam in that sony? that can be a little tricky.
maybe you to patch the kernel for special devices.
but why do you want to use windoze?
good luck
Catanius
Am 23.09.2010 15:16, schrieb Blue Print:
can someone tell
** Attachment added: BootDmesg.txt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/64/+attachment/1612167/+files/BootDmesg.txt
** Attachment added: CurrentDmesg.txt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/64/+attachment/1612168/+files/CurrentDmesg.txt
** Attachment added: DKMSBuildLog.txt
Public bug reported:
Ubuntu 10.04
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
Package: fglrx 2:8.723.1-0ubuntu4
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-25.44-generic 2.6.32.21+drm33.7
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-25-generic x86_64
Architecture: amd64
Date: Mon Sep 20 09:55:47 2010
ErrorMessage: fglrx
looks like a kernel problem of 2.6.32-25 64 bit.
will try another one
Am 20.09.2010 12:35, schrieb Jean-Baptiste Lallement:
** Also affects: fglrx-installer (Ubuntu Lucid)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: fglrx-installer (Ubuntu Lucid)
Importance: Undecided
