[Bug 1333569] Re: Hibernate with fwts will cause hwclock command to time out
Ah, 3.13.0-29-generic, I'll see if this bug has been around in previous upstream versions now I've got an easy reproducer. ** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: fwts Assignee: (unassigned) = Colin King (colin-king) ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Colin King (colin-king) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1333569 Title: Hibernate with fwts will cause hwclock command to time out To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/fwts/+bug/1333569/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1333322] [NEW] enable intel_pstate as default with thermald for x86
Public bug reported: Intel-pstate should be enabled as it has improved in stability over the past several kernel releases and does promise some excellent performance + power gains. It would be also be *very* helpful if thermald is also installed for x86 platforms when intel-pstate is enabled to ensure thermal overrun does not occur on some poorly designed laptops that cannot dissipate heat effectivly when being driven hard by intel-pstate. ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Andy Whitcroft (apw) Status: New ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Andy Whitcroft (apw) ** Summary changed: - enabled intel_pstate as default with thermald for x86 + enable intel_pstate as default with thermald for x86 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/122 Title: enable intel_pstate as default with thermald for x86 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/122/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1322148] Re: [MacBookPro11,1] Utopic freezes on boot
This can also be avoided by install with the standard desktop image using EFI install mode rather than installing with the mac desktop ISO image. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1322148 Title: [MacBookPro11,1] Utopic freezes on boot To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1322148/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1322148] Re: [MacBookPro11,1] Utopic freezes on boot
The underlying issue was that this was booting in CSM mode and the x2apic wasn't being configured correctly causing an SMP boot to hang. We solved this issue by using the EFI grub loader to avoid booting in CSM mode. 1. add /boot/efi /etc/fstab 2. install grub-efi running grub-install --target=x86_64 and reboot. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1322148 Title: [MacBookPro11,1] Utopic freezes on boot To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1322148/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1316617] [NEW] babeltrace unaligned access bus errors
Public bug reported: Decoding an lttng user space trace on an ARM platform results in a bus error.Gdb shows this to be: 0x4004358c in yyparse (scanner=0x19fe0, yyscanner=0x199f0) at ctf-parser.y:1210 1210$$-u.unary_expression.u.unsigned_constant = $1; (gdb) where #0 0x4004358c in yyparse (scanner=0x19fe0, yyscanner=0x199f0) at ctf-parser.y:1210 #1 0x400380ca in ctf_trace_metadata_read (td=td@entry=0x1a600, metadata_fp=metadata_fp@entry=0x0, scanner=0x19fe0, append=append@entry=0) at ctf.c:1281 #2 0x40039d38 in ctf_open_trace_read (metadata_fp=0x0, packet_seek=0x40039295 ctf_packet_seek, flags=0, path=0x19ab0 /home/phablet/lttng-traces/auto-20130101-023753/ust/uid/0/32-bit, td=0x1a600) at ctf.c:2111 #3 ctf_open_trace ( path=0x19ab0 /home/phablet/lttng-traces/auto-20130101-023753/ust/uid/0/32-bit, flags=0, packet_seek=0x40039295 ctf_packet_seek, metadata_fp=0x0) at ctf.c:2206 #4 0x400242f8 in bt_context_add_trace (ctx=ctx@entry=0x15f30, path=0x19ab0 /home/phablet/lttng-traces/auto-20130101-023753/ust/uid/0/32-bit, format_name=format_name@entry=0x15ff0 ctf, packet_seek=packet_seek@entry=0x0, stream_list=stream_list@entry=0x0, metadata=metadata@entry=0x0) at context.c:95 #5 0xa7d2 in bt_context_add_traces_recursive (ctx=ctx@entry=0x15f30, path=path@entry=0x18968 /home/phablet/lttng-traces/auto-20130101-023753, format_str=0x15ff0 ctf, packet_seek=packet_seek@entry=0x0) at babeltrace.c:529 #6 0x9c86 in main (argc=optimized out, argv=optimized out) A workaround is to enable misaligned access handling in the kernel: echo 2 | sudo tee /proc/cpu/alignment Alternatively, making struct ctf_node in formats/ctf/metadata/ctf-ast.h packed using the gcc attribute __attribute__((packed())) seems to stop this. I think this is reported upstream too: https://bugs.lttng.org/issues/789 ** Affects: babeltrace (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1316617 Title: babeltrace unaligned access bus errors To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/babeltrace/+bug/1316617/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1314697] Re: Upon upgrade, DNS resolution no longer works
I'm seeing this too, strace show it spinning on: select(8, [0 3 6 7], [], [6], NULL) = 1 (in [0]) recvmsg(0, 0x7fffdb2aa6d0, 0) = -1 ENOTSOCK (Socket operation on non-socket) accept(0, 0, NULL) = -1 ENOTSOCK (Socket operation on non-socket) select(8, [0 3 6 7], [], [6], NULL) = 1 (in [0]) recvmsg(0, 0x7fffdb2aa6d0, 0) = -1 ENOTSOCK (Socket operation on non-socket) accept(0, 0, NULL) = -1 ENOTSOCK (Socket operation on non-socket) So we're getting ENOTSOCK on fd 0, which is /dev/null : -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1314697 Title: Upon upgrade, DNS resolution no longer works To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/1314697/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1314697] Re: Upon upgrade, DNS resolution no longer works
I'm seeing this too, strace show it spinning on: select(8, [0 3 6 7], [], [6], NULL) = 1 (in [0]) recvmsg(0, 0x7fffdb2aa6d0, 0) = -1 ENOTSOCK (Socket operation on non-socket) accept(0, 0, NULL) = -1 ENOTSOCK (Socket operation on non-socket) select(8, [0 3 6 7], [], [6], NULL) = 1 (in [0]) recvmsg(0, 0x7fffdb2aa6d0, 0) = -1 ENOTSOCK (Socket operation on non-socket) accept(0, 0, NULL) = -1 ENOTSOCK (Socket operation on non-socket) So we're getting ENOTSOCK on fd 0, which is /dev/null : -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1314697 Title: Upon upgrade, DNS resolution no longer works To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/1314697/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1314527] Re: thermald: change the default dbus policy, make it more restrictive
Tested thermald 1.1~rc2-11ubuntu0.1 on a clean install of Trusty and it fixes the issue. ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1314527 Title: thermald: change the default dbus policy, make it more restrictive To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thermald/+bug/1314527/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1314708] [NEW] dnsmasq is consuming ~100% of one CPU
Public bug reported: I did a clean install of trusty and upgraded to utopic on a desktop and on the next reboot I observed one CPU was being totally pegged by dnsmasq top: top - 17:15:32 up 16 min, 4 users, load average: 1.02, 1.02, 0.69 Tasks: 197 total, 2 running, 193 sleeping, 2 stopped, 0 zombie %Cpu(s): 15.8 us, 9.5 sy, 1.1 ni, 73.6 id, 0.0 wa, 0.0 hi, 0.0 si, 0.0 st KiB Mem: 7930260 total, 1369624 used, 6560636 free,34480 buffers KiB Swap: 8139772 total,0 used, 8139772 free. 767456 cached Mem PID USER PR NIVIRTRESSHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 1433 nobody20 0 42248 1664 1376 R 100.0 0.0 15:55.66 dnsmasq 1 root 20 0 34152 3316 1460 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.92 init 2 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kthreadd 3 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 ksoftirqd/0 strace show it spinning on: select(8, [0 3 6 7], [], [6], NULL) = 1 (in [0]) recvmsg(0, 0x7fffdb2aa6d0, 0) = -1 ENOTSOCK (Socket operation on non-socket) accept(0, 0, NULL) = -1 ENOTSOCK (Socket operation on non-socket) select(8, [0 3 6 7], [], [6], NULL) = 1 (in [0]) recvmsg(0, 0x7fffdb2aa6d0, 0) = -1 ENOTSOCK (Socket operation on non-socket) accept(0, 0, NULL) = -1 ENOTSOCK (Socket operation on non-socket) So we're getting ENOTSOCK on fd 0, which is /dev/null : total 0 dr-x-- 2 root root 0 Apr 30 17:21 . dr-xr-xr-x 9 nobody dip 0 Apr 30 17:21 .. lrwx-- 1 root root 64 Apr 30 17:21 0 - /dev/null lrwx-- 1 root root 64 Apr 30 17:21 1 - /dev/null lrwx-- 1 root root 64 Apr 30 17:21 2 - /dev/null lrwx-- 1 root root 64 Apr 30 17:21 3 - socket:[12881] lrwx-- 1 root root 64 Apr 30 17:21 4 - socket:[12883] lrwx-- 1 root root 64 Apr 30 17:21 5 - socket:[12884] lrwx-- 1 root root 64 Apr 30 17:21 6 - socket:[12885] lr-x-- 1 root root 64 Apr 30 17:21 7 - pipe:[13568] l-wx-- 1 root root 64 Apr 30 17:21 8 - pipe:[13568] lrwx-- 1 root root 64 Apr 30 17:21 9 - socket:[13570] ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.10 Package: dnsmasq (not installed) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-24.46-generic 3.13.9 Uname: Linux 3.13.0-24-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.14.2-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 Date: Wed Apr 30 17:17:00 2014 InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-04-30 (0 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 14.04 LTS Trusty Tahr - Release amd64 (20140417) SourcePackage: dnsmasq UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: dnsmasq (Ubuntu) Importance: High Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug utopic ** Changed in: dnsmasq (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1314708 Title: dnsmasq is consuming ~100% of one CPU To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/1314708/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1314708] Re: dnsmasq is consuming ~100% of one CPU
Sending a bug report by ubuntu-bug is impossible since I can't resolve any hostnames with dnsmasq borked like this. This happens on every reboot too. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1314708 Title: dnsmasq is consuming ~100% of one CPU To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/1314708/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1314527] [NEW] thernald: change the default dbus policy, make it more restrictive
Public bug reported: org.freedesktop.thermald.conf default dbus policy should be more restrictive ** Affects: thermald (Ubuntu) Importance: Medium Assignee: Colin King (colin-king) Status: In Progress ** Changed in: thermald (Ubuntu) Status: New = In Progress ** Changed in: thermald (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Medium ** Changed in: thermald (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Colin King (colin-king) ** Changed in: thermald (Ubuntu) Milestone: None = trusty-updates -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1314527 Title: thernald: change the default dbus policy, make it more restrictive To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thermald/+bug/1314527/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1314527] Re: thernald: change the default dbus policy, make it more restrictive
Attached is a debdiff with the fix to set the dbus policy correctly. ** Patch added: debdiff containing fix https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thermald/+bug/1314527/+attachment/4101112/+files/fix-lp-1314527.diff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1314527 Title: thermald: change the default dbus policy, make it more restrictive To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thermald/+bug/1314527/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1314527] Re: thermald: change the default dbus policy, make it more restrictive
** Summary changed: - thernald: change the default dbus policy, make it more restrictive + thermald: change the default dbus policy, make it more restrictive -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1314527 Title: thermald: change the default dbus policy, make it more restrictive To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thermald/+bug/1314527/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1314527] Re: thermald: change the default dbus policy, make it more restrictive
Note that thermald is not a default install or start package. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1314527 Title: thermald: change the default dbus policy, make it more restrictive To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thermald/+bug/1314527/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1314527] Re: thermald: change the default dbus policy, make it more restrictive
SRU Justification: [Impact] With the current dbus policy one can terminate thermald using: dbus-send --system --dest=org.freedesktop.thermald /org/freedesktop/thermald org.freedesktop.thermald.Terminate thermald can be send dbus ..fortunately init respawns thermald, but the policy is not restrictive enough, only root should be able to do this. Justification: This fix restricts the default policy so only root can send dbus messages to thermald. [Test Case] How to reproduce: dbus-send --system --dest=org.freedesktop.thermald /org/freedesktop/thermald org.freedesktop.thermald.Terminate thermald can be send dbus then use: dmesg and see that init has respawned thermald (which means it received the dbus message and handled it) With the fix, the dbus-send message won't kill thermald and hence one won't see the re-spawn message in dmesg. [Regression Potential] Cannot think of any, low to none. Thermald is not a default install, it is a new packaging in Trusty and is currently op-in, so this change has minimal impact. Regression potential is that users won't be able to communicate to thermald via dbus-send, which is not the recommended way to shut down thermald anyhow. Tested today on an AMD64 trusty install. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1314527 Title: thermald: change the default dbus policy, make it more restrictive To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thermald/+bug/1314527/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1314653] [NEW] sysvinit: default cpufreq governor to powersave for intel-pstate driver
Public bug reported: When defaulting to the intel-pstate driver, there are only a couple of cpufreq governors available, none of which are handled in the /etc/init.d/ondemand script. Since this driver is meant to be used for power saving, it seems wrong to leave the system in the kernel default configured performance governor after boot, so I think it is pertinent to set this to powersave if it is the only suitable non-power hungry governor available. How to reproduce: 1. enable the intel_pstate driver on a recent Intel machine (Sandybridge or above) edit /etc/default/grub, modify the following: GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT=quiet splash intel_pstate=enable and run: sudo update-grub and reboot. 2. login 3. wait at least 60 seconds for /etc/init.d/ondemand to complete check out the default cpufreq governor, you will see it is still set to the boot default of performance: cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/scaling_governor With the attached fix the system will boot into a less aggressive cpufreq governor. ** Affects: sysvinit (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Patch added: 95_ondemand_pstate.patch https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1314653/+attachment/4101463/+files/95_ondemand_pstate.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1314653 Title: sysvinit: default cpufreq governor to powersave for intel-pstate driver To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sysvinit/+bug/1314653/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1314653] Re: sysvinit: default cpufreq governor to powersave for intel-pstate driver
** Changed in: sysvinit (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1314653 Title: sysvinit: default cpufreq governor to powersave for intel-pstate driver To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sysvinit/+bug/1314653/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1314708] Re: dnsmasq is consuming ~100% of one CPU
Sending a bug report by ubuntu-bug is impossible since I can't resolve any hostnames with dnsmasq borked like this. This happens on every reboot too. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1314708 Title: dnsmasq is consuming ~100% of one CPU To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/1314708/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1314708] [NEW] dnsmasq is consuming ~100% of one CPU
Public bug reported: I did a clean install of trusty and upgraded to utopic on a desktop and on the next reboot I observed one CPU was being totally pegged by dnsmasq top: top - 17:15:32 up 16 min, 4 users, load average: 1.02, 1.02, 0.69 Tasks: 197 total, 2 running, 193 sleeping, 2 stopped, 0 zombie %Cpu(s): 15.8 us, 9.5 sy, 1.1 ni, 73.6 id, 0.0 wa, 0.0 hi, 0.0 si, 0.0 st KiB Mem: 7930260 total, 1369624 used, 6560636 free,34480 buffers KiB Swap: 8139772 total,0 used, 8139772 free. 767456 cached Mem PID USER PR NIVIRTRESSHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 1433 nobody20 0 42248 1664 1376 R 100.0 0.0 15:55.66 dnsmasq 1 root 20 0 34152 3316 1460 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.92 init 2 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kthreadd 3 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 ksoftirqd/0 strace show it spinning on: select(8, [0 3 6 7], [], [6], NULL) = 1 (in [0]) recvmsg(0, 0x7fffdb2aa6d0, 0) = -1 ENOTSOCK (Socket operation on non-socket) accept(0, 0, NULL) = -1 ENOTSOCK (Socket operation on non-socket) select(8, [0 3 6 7], [], [6], NULL) = 1 (in [0]) recvmsg(0, 0x7fffdb2aa6d0, 0) = -1 ENOTSOCK (Socket operation on non-socket) accept(0, 0, NULL) = -1 ENOTSOCK (Socket operation on non-socket) So we're getting ENOTSOCK on fd 0, which is /dev/null : total 0 dr-x-- 2 root root 0 Apr 30 17:21 . dr-xr-xr-x 9 nobody dip 0 Apr 30 17:21 .. lrwx-- 1 root root 64 Apr 30 17:21 0 - /dev/null lrwx-- 1 root root 64 Apr 30 17:21 1 - /dev/null lrwx-- 1 root root 64 Apr 30 17:21 2 - /dev/null lrwx-- 1 root root 64 Apr 30 17:21 3 - socket:[12881] lrwx-- 1 root root 64 Apr 30 17:21 4 - socket:[12883] lrwx-- 1 root root 64 Apr 30 17:21 5 - socket:[12884] lrwx-- 1 root root 64 Apr 30 17:21 6 - socket:[12885] lr-x-- 1 root root 64 Apr 30 17:21 7 - pipe:[13568] l-wx-- 1 root root 64 Apr 30 17:21 8 - pipe:[13568] lrwx-- 1 root root 64 Apr 30 17:21 9 - socket:[13570] ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.10 Package: dnsmasq (not installed) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-24.46-generic 3.13.9 Uname: Linux 3.13.0-24-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.14.2-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 Date: Wed Apr 30 17:17:00 2014 InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-04-30 (0 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 14.04 LTS Trusty Tahr - Release amd64 (20140417) SourcePackage: dnsmasq UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: dnsmasq (Ubuntu) Importance: High Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug utopic ** Changed in: dnsmasq (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1314708 Title: dnsmasq is consuming ~100% of one CPU To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/1314708/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1294669] Re: bash crashed with SIGABRT in programming_error()
Tested with bash 4.3-7ubuntu1, and I can't reproduce the issue now, hence fixed for me. Thanks! ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1294669 Title: bash crashed with SIGABRT in programming_error() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bash/+bug/1294669/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1307794] Re: CPU frequency scaling not available
The firmware does not supply the _PSS (Performance Supported States) object that informs the kernel the supported processor performance states of the system.This explains why cpu scaling does not work for any kernel you chose. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1307794 Title: CPU frequency scaling not available To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/1307794/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1308130] [NEW] indicator-messages-service is waking up every 4 seconds adding inotifies on paths that don't exist
Public bug reported:
I've observed that an idle indicator-messages-services is waking up
every 4 seconds on a poll() and doing two inotify_add_watch() calls on
paths that don't exist, which wastes power on devices such as phones.
strace shows:
clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, {10117, 224455428}) = 0
poll([{fd=8, events=POLLIN}, {fd=9, events=POLLIN}], 2, 3991) = 0 (Timeout)
clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, {10121, 224516469}) = 0
inotify_add_watch(9, /usr/local/share/applications,
IN_MODIFY|IN_ATTRIB|IN_CLOSE_WRITE|IN_MOVED_FROM|IN_MOVED_TO|IN_CREATE|IN_DELETE|IN_DELETE_SELF|IN_MOVE_SELF|IN_UNMOUNT|IN_ONLYDIR)
= -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
inotify_add_watch(9, /usr/share/ubuntu-touch/applications,
IN_MODIFY|IN_ATTRIB|IN_CLOSE_WRITE|IN_MOVED_FROM|IN_MOVED_TO|IN_CREATE|IN_DELETE|IN_DELETE_SELF|IN_MOVE_SELF|IN_UNMOUNT|IN_ONLYDIR)
= -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, {10121, 232085521}) = 0
poll([{fd=8, events=POLLIN}, {fd=9, events=POLLIN}], 2, 3984) = 0 (Timeout)
clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, {10125, 222593684}) = 0
inotify_add_watch(9, /usr/local/share/applications,
IN_MODIFY|IN_ATTRIB|IN_CLOSE_WRITE|IN_MOVED_FROM|IN_MOVED_TO|IN_CREATE|IN_DELETE|IN_DELETE_SELF|IN_MOVE_SELF|IN_UNMOUNT|IN_ONLYDIR)
= -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
inotify_add_watch(9, /usr/share/ubuntu-touch/applications,
IN_MODIFY|IN_ATTRIB|IN_CLOSE_WRITE|IN_MOVED_FROM|IN_MOVED_TO|IN_CREATE|IN_DELETE|IN_DELETE_SELF|IN_MOVE_SELF|IN_UNMOUNT|IN_ONLYDIR)
= -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, {10125, 229094524}) = 0
Can these redundant polling checks be reduced or removed? Polling every
4 seconds is a little bit heavy handed IMHO.
** Affects: indicator-messages (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1308130
Title:
indicator-messages-service is waking up every 4 seconds adding
inotifies on paths that don't exist
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/indicator-messages/+bug/1308130/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1308130] Re: indicator-messages-service is waking up every 4 seconds adding inotifies on paths that don't exist
This shows up in the daily testing too: http://ci.ubuntu.com/power/eventstat/image/3138/machine/6/task /indicator-messages-service/details/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1308130 Title: indicator-messages-service is waking up every 4 seconds adding inotifies on paths that don't exist To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/indicator-messages/+bug/1308130/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1308130] Re: indicator-messages-service is waking up every 4 seconds adding inotifies on paths that don't exist
OK, I understand. My concern is that we do have a lot of processes doing this kind of polling, so the cumulative effect of the same root issue is causing a lot of unwanted wakeups on a so called idle system. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1308130 Title: indicator-messages-service is waking up every 4 seconds adding inotifies on paths that don't exist To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/indicator-messages/+bug/1308130/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1267570] Re: Mako not always entering suspend (msm_hsic_host wakelock)
With a clean install from yesterday's image I left the mako idle and then ran some analysis on the data from the kernel log to see how well it is now deep sleeping: Suspends: 1579 suspends aborted (57.21%). 1181 suspends succeeded (42.79%). total time: 14175.313684 seconds (92.86%). minimum: 0.383868 seconds. maximum: 792.576755 seconds. mean: 12.002806 seconds. Time between successful suspends: 0.000 -0.124 seconds 608 51.53% 0.125 -0.249 seconds 0 0.00% 0.250 -0.499 seconds13 1.10% 0.500 -0.999 seconds10 0.85% 1.000 -1.999 seconds 523 44.32% 2.000 -3.999 seconds 8 0.68% 4.000 -7.999 seconds 3 0.25% 8.000 - 15.999 seconds 8 0.68% 16.000 - 31.999 seconds 7 0.59% Duration of successful suspends: 0.250 -0.499 seconds40 3.39% 0.500 -0.999 seconds77 6.52% 1.000 -1.999 seconds 225 19.05% 2.000 -3.999 seconds 127 10.75% 4.000 -7.999 seconds 201 17.02% 8.000 - 15.999 seconds 176 14.90% 16.000 - 31.999 seconds 316 26.76% 32.000 - 63.999 seconds14 1.19% 64.000 - 127.999 seconds 2 0.17% 128.000 - 255.999 seconds 1 0.08% 256.000 - 511.999 seconds 1 0.08% 512.000 - seconds 1 0.08% Suspend blocking wakelocks: qcom_rx_wakelock 20 76.92% wlan4 15.38% msm_hsic_host 2 7.69% So for about 92% of the time it was in deep sleep with frequent wakeups that didn't seem to last that long. So all, in all, not too bad. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1267570 Title: Mako not always entering suspend (msm_hsic_host wakelock) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-mako/+bug/1267570/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1304321] Re: [Dell Latitude E7440] FAILED [HIGH] DevConfigDiffAfterS4
The differences are just network IP address and the PCI status word, these are not a problem. Version 14.03 of fwts will ignore IP address issues, so perhaps this newer version of fwts should be used instead. I'll look at fixing up fwts to handle any PCI config differences in a more intelligent way. As it is, I don't believe this is an issue, we can safely ignore this. ** Changed in: fwts (Ubuntu) Status: New = Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1304321 Title: [Dell Latitude E7440] FAILED [HIGH] DevConfigDiffAfterS4 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fwts/+bug/1304321/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1303710] [NEW] installing server on an NVME device fails because nvme is not in the d-i
Public bug reported: Can't install to nvme. fails on server because driver is not in d-i and can't be loaded. Tested on today's server ISO ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04 Package: linux-image-3.13.0-23-generic 3.13.0-23.45 [modified: boot/vmlinuz-3.13.0-23-generic] ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-23.45-generic 3.13.8 Uname: Linux 3.13.0-23-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 AudioDevicesInUse: USERPID ACCESS COMMAND /dev/snd/controlC0: king 1663 F pulseaudio /dev/snd/controlC1: king 1663 F pulseaudio CurrentDesktop: Unity Date: Mon Apr 7 11:10:35 2014 HibernationDevice: RESUME=UUID=d6cdc053-0837-4bd4-9b38-e4ef26a3824c InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-04-07 (0 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 14.04 LTS Trusty Tahr - Daily amd64 (20140406) MachineType: Intel Corporation Shark Bay Client platform ProcFB: 0 inteldrmfb ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.13.0-23-generic.efi.signed root=UUID=1640fb5d-ebb5-49e2-8433-742d165e2693 ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7 RelatedPackageVersions: linux-restricted-modules-3.13.0-23-generic N/A linux-backports-modules-3.13.0-23-generic N/A linux-firmware 1.127 RfKill: 0: phy0: Wireless LAN Soft blocked: no Hard blocked: no SourcePackage: linux UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) dmi.bios.date: 01/28/2013 dmi.bios.vendor: Intel Corporation dmi.bios.version: HSWLPTU1.86C.0109.R03.1301282055 dmi.board.asset.tag: Base Board Asset Tag dmi.board.name: Flathead Creek Crb dmi.board.vendor: Intel Corp. dmi.board.version: 2 dmi.chassis.asset.tag: Asset Tag dmi.chassis.type: 3 dmi.chassis.vendor: Intel Corporation dmi.chassis.version: 0.1 dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnIntelCorporation:bvrHSWLPTU1.86C.0109.R03.1301282055:bd01/28/2013:svnIntelCorporation:pnSharkBayClientplatform:pvr0.1:rvnIntelCorp.:rnFlatheadCreekCrb:rvr2:cvnIntelCorporation:ct3:cvr0.1: dmi.product.name: Shark Bay Client platform dmi.product.version: 0.1 dmi.sys.vendor: Intel Corporation ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug trusty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1303710 Title: installing server on an NVME device fails because nvme is not in the d-i To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1303710/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1303710] Re: installing server on an NVME device fails because nvme is not in the d-i
xnox suggests the fix is: diff --git a/debian.master/d-i/modules/block-modules b/debian.master/d-i/modules/block-modules index 546c900..3019387 100644 --- a/debian.master/d-i/modules/block-modules +++ b/debian.master/d-i/modules/block-modules @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ hpsa ? kbic ? ktti ? nbd ? +nvme ? on20 ? on26 ? paride ? ** Description changed: - Can't install to nvme fails on server because driveris not in d-i and + Can't install to nvme fails on server because driver is not in d-i and can't be loaded. Tested on today's server ISO ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04 Package: linux-image-3.13.0-23-generic 3.13.0-23.45 [modified: boot/vmlinuz-3.13.0-23-generic] ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-23.45-generic 3.13.8 Uname: Linux 3.13.0-23-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 AudioDevicesInUse: - USERPID ACCESS COMMAND - /dev/snd/controlC0: king 1663 F pulseaudio - /dev/snd/controlC1: king 1663 F pulseaudio + USERPID ACCESS COMMAND + /dev/snd/controlC0: king 1663 F pulseaudio + /dev/snd/controlC1: king 1663 F pulseaudio CurrentDesktop: Unity Date: Mon Apr 7 11:10:35 2014 HibernationDevice: RESUME=UUID=d6cdc053-0837-4bd4-9b38-e4ef26a3824c InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-04-07 (0 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 14.04 LTS Trusty Tahr - Daily amd64 (20140406) MachineType: Intel Corporation Shark Bay Client platform ProcFB: 0 inteldrmfb ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.13.0-23-generic.efi.signed root=UUID=1640fb5d-ebb5-49e2-8433-742d165e2693 ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7 RelatedPackageVersions: - linux-restricted-modules-3.13.0-23-generic N/A - linux-backports-modules-3.13.0-23-generic N/A - linux-firmware 1.127 + linux-restricted-modules-3.13.0-23-generic N/A + linux-backports-modules-3.13.0-23-generic N/A + linux-firmware 1.127 RfKill: - 0: phy0: Wireless LAN - Soft blocked: no - Hard blocked: no + 0: phy0: Wireless LAN + Soft blocked: no + Hard blocked: no SourcePackage: linux UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) dmi.bios.date: 01/28/2013 dmi.bios.vendor: Intel Corporation dmi.bios.version: HSWLPTU1.86C.0109.R03.1301282055 dmi.board.asset.tag: Base Board Asset Tag dmi.board.name: Flathead Creek Crb dmi.board.vendor: Intel Corp. dmi.board.version: 2 dmi.chassis.asset.tag: Asset Tag dmi.chassis.type: 3 dmi.chassis.vendor: Intel Corporation dmi.chassis.version: 0.1 dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnIntelCorporation:bvrHSWLPTU1.86C.0109.R03.1301282055:bd01/28/2013:svnIntelCorporation:pnSharkBayClientplatform:pvr0.1:rvnIntelCorp.:rnFlatheadCreekCrb:rvr2:cvnIntelCorporation:ct3:cvr0.1: dmi.product.name: Shark Bay Client platform dmi.product.version: 0.1 dmi.sys.vendor: Intel Corporation ** Description changed: - Can't install to nvme fails on server because driver is not in d-i and + Can't install to nvme. fails on server because driver is not in d-i and can't be loaded. Tested on today's server ISO ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04 Package: linux-image-3.13.0-23-generic 3.13.0-23.45 [modified: boot/vmlinuz-3.13.0-23-generic] ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-23.45-generic 3.13.8 Uname: Linux 3.13.0-23-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 AudioDevicesInUse: USERPID ACCESS COMMAND /dev/snd/controlC0: king 1663 F pulseaudio /dev/snd/controlC1: king 1663 F pulseaudio CurrentDesktop: Unity Date: Mon Apr 7 11:10:35 2014 HibernationDevice: RESUME=UUID=d6cdc053-0837-4bd4-9b38-e4ef26a3824c InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-04-07 (0 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 14.04 LTS Trusty Tahr - Daily amd64 (20140406) MachineType: Intel Corporation Shark Bay Client platform ProcFB: 0 inteldrmfb ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.13.0-23-generic.efi.signed root=UUID=1640fb5d-ebb5-49e2-8433-742d165e2693 ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7 RelatedPackageVersions: linux-restricted-modules-3.13.0-23-generic N/A linux-backports-modules-3.13.0-23-generic N/A linux-firmware 1.127 RfKill: 0: phy0: Wireless LAN Soft blocked: no Hard blocked: no SourcePackage: linux UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) dmi.bios.date: 01/28/2013 dmi.bios.vendor: Intel Corporation dmi.bios.version: HSWLPTU1.86C.0109.R03.1301282055 dmi.board.asset.tag: Base Board Asset Tag dmi.board.name: Flathead Creek Crb dmi.board.vendor: Intel Corp. dmi.board.version: 2 dmi.chassis.asset.tag: Asset Tag dmi.chassis.type: 3 dmi.chassis.vendor: Intel Corporation dmi.chassis.version: 0.1 dmi.modalias:
[Bug 1292674] Re: virt-manager.py is being exec'd every second when running virt-manager
That works fine for me. Thanks Serge. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1292674 Title: virt-manager.py is being exec'd every second when running virt-manager To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/virt-manager/+bug/1292674/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1300722] Re: hud-service is eating up 100% of one of my CPUs in a poll loop
** Summary changed: - hud-service is eating up 100% of one of my CPUs in a pool loop + hud-service is eating up 100% of one of my CPUs in a poll loop -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1300722 Title: hud-service is eating up 100% of one of my CPUs in a poll loop To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hud/+bug/1300722/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1253734] Re: HP EliteBook 6930p: scaling_max_freq is less than highest frequencies in scaling_available_frequencies
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1253734 Title: HP EliteBook 6930p: scaling_max_freq is less than highest frequencies in scaling_available_frequencies To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1253734/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1289532] Re: NetworkManager is polling every 4 seconds on the Desktop looking for /var/lib/ofono
With version of 0.9.8.8-0ubuntu5 I still see one of the threads doing:
inotify_add_watch(8, /var/lib/ofono,
IN_MODIFY|IN_ATTRIB|IN_CLOSE_WRITE|IN_MOVED_FROM|IN_MOVED_TO|IN_CREATE|IN_DELETE|IN_DELETE_SELF|IN_MOVE_SELF|IN_UNMOUNT|IN_ONLYDIR)
= -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
poll([{fd=9, events=POLLIN}, {fd=8, events=POLLIN}], 2, 3997) = 0 (Timeout)
inotify_add_watch(8, /var/lib/ofono,
IN_MODIFY|IN_ATTRIB|IN_CLOSE_WRITE|IN_MOVED_FROM|IN_MOVED_TO|IN_CREATE|IN_DELETE|IN_DELETE_SELF|IN_MOVE_SELF|IN_UNMOUNT|IN_ONLYDIR)
= -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
poll([{fd=9, events=POLLIN}, {fd=8, events=POLLIN}], 2, 3998) = 0 (Timeout)
inotify_add_watch(8, /var/lib/ofono,
IN_MODIFY|IN_ATTRIB|IN_CLOSE_WRITE|IN_MOVED_FROM|IN_MOVED_TO|IN_CREATE|IN_DELETE|IN_DELETE_SELF|IN_MOVE_SELF|IN_UNMOUNT|IN_ONLYDIR)
= -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
poll([{fd=9, events=POLLIN}, {fd=8, events=POLLIN}], 2, 3995) = 0 (Timeout)
inotify_add_watch(8, /var/lib/ofono,
IN_MODIFY|IN_ATTRIB|IN_CLOSE_WRITE|IN_MOVED_FROM|IN_MOVED_TO|IN_CREATE|IN_DELETE|IN_DELETE_SELF|IN_MOVE_SELF|IN_UNMOUNT|IN_ONLYDIR)
= -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
poll([{fd=9, events=POLLIN}, {fd=8, events=POLLIN}], 2, 3996) = 0 (Timeout)
inotify_add_watch(8, /var/lib/ofono,
IN_MODIFY|IN_ATTRIB|IN_CLOSE_WRITE|IN_MOVED_FROM|IN_MOVED_TO|IN_CREATE|IN_DELETE|IN_DELETE_SELF|IN_MOVE_SELF|IN_UNMOUNT|IN_ONLYDIR)
= -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
poll([{fd=9, events=POLLIN}, {fd=8, events=POLLIN}], 2, 3996) = 0 (Timeout)
So a 0.25 Hz timeout and an inotify watch being added each time which
seems redundant on the desktop.
This is on a cleanly installed machine as of last week so I'm confident
that my laptop is relatively sane when it comes to installed packages.
To track this down I did:
sudo health-check -p NetworkManager
this showed up as:
System calls traced:
PID Process Syscall CountRate/SecTotal
μSecs % Call Time
949 NetworkManager recvmsg 211 3.5167
2520 0.0021
949 NetworkManager sendmsg 108 1.8000
2044 0.0017
949 NetworkManager poll 97 1.6167
53977531 45.3342
949 NetworkManager write77 1.2833
873 0.0007
949 NetworkManager read 52 0.8667
606 0.0005
949 NetworkManager restart_syscall 1 0.0167
5542655 4.6551
952 NetworkManager rt_sigtimedwait 1 0.0167
0 0.
959 NetworkManager inotify_add_watch15 0.2500
301 0.0003
959 NetworkManager poll 15 0.2500
56001456 47.0340
959 NetworkManager restart_syscall 1 0.0167
3537933 2.9714
963 NetworkManager restart_syscall 1 0.0167
0 0.
Total 579 9.6500
119065919
and also:
Inotify watches added:
PID Process Rate/Sec File
959 NetworkManager 0.250 /var/lib/ofono
so then I just strace'd pid 959 and the rogue polling and inotify watch is
apparent. Hope that clarifies.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1289532
Title:
NetworkManager is polling every 4 seconds on the Desktop looking for
/var/lib/ofono
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager/+bug/1289532/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 948972] Re: compiz segfaults when mounting/unmounting a loopback device quickly
Can't reproduce this now, so looks like it is fixed. Thanks -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/948972 Title: compiz segfaults when mounting/unmounting a loopback device quickly To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/948972/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1292674] Re: virt-manager.py is being exec'd every second when running virt-manager
@Serge, any idea when or if the fix will land in Trusty? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1292674 Title: virt-manager.py is being exec'd every second when running virt-manager To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/virt-manager/+bug/1292674/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1266873] Re: gnome-settings-daemon is polling for seemingly no good reason at all
** Changed in: ubuntu-power-consumption Status: New = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1266873 Title: gnome-settings-daemon is polling for seemingly no good reason at all To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-power-consumption/+bug/1266873/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 906470] Re: ubuntuone client allows one to sync ecryptfs encrypted files to the cloud and logs the unencrypyted name in the syncdeamon log
** Changed in: ubuntuone-client (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/906470 Title: ubuntuone client allows one to sync ecryptfs encrypted files to the cloud and logs the unencrypyted name in the syncdeamon log To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntuone-client/+bug/906470/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 677525] Re: Client stopped working when copying files to another users shared folder which got unshared during the copying process
** Changed in: ubuntuone-client (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/677525 Title: Client stopped working when copying files to another users shared folder which got unshared during the copying process To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntuone-client/+bug/677525/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1253734] Re: HP EliteBook 6930p: scaling_max_freq is less than highest frequencies in scaling_available_frequencies
@Brendan, I will close this bug in a short while as it has not been updated for nearly 3 months -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1253734 Title: HP EliteBook 6930p: scaling_max_freq is less than highest frequencies in scaling_available_frequencies To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1253734/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1231455] Re: powerd-cli help could do with some cleaning up and fixing
** No longer affects: powerd -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1231455 Title: powerd-cli help could do with some cleaning up and fixing To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/powerd/+bug/1231455/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 948972] Re: compiz segfaults when mounting/unmounting a loopback device quickly
** Changed in: gnome-disk-utility (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released ** Changed in: unity Status: Incomplete = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/948972 Title: compiz segfaults when mounting/unmounting a loopback device quickly To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/948972/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1301984] [NEW] unity-scope-loader is adding the SAME inotify watches regularly every 4 seconds
Public bug reported: unity-scope-loader is adding the SAME inotify watches regularly every 4 seconds: Inotify watches added: PID Process Rate/Sec File 3495 unity-scope-loader 0.250 /usr/share/upstart/xdg/menus/unity-lens-applications-merged 3495 unity-scope-loader 0.250 /etc/xdg/menus/unity-lens-applications-merged 3495 unity-scope-loader 0.250 /usr/share/upstart/xdg/menus 3495 unity-scope-loader 0.250 /usr/local/share/applications 3495 unity-scope-loader 0.250 /usr/share/ubuntu/applications 3495 unity-scope-loader 0.250 /home/king/.config/menus/unity-lens-applications-merged 3495 unity-scope-loader 0.250 /etc/xdg/xdg-ubuntu/menus 3495 unity-scope-loader 0.250 /etc/xdg/xdg-ubuntu/menus/unity-lens-applications-merged I'm seeing every 4 seconds the *same* files being added to an inotify watch. Additionally, the code is polling every 4 seconds to do this: Top polling system calls: PID Process Syscall Rate/Sec Infinite Zero MinimumMaximumAverage Timeouts Timeouts TimeoutTimeoutTimeout 3476 unity-scope-loader poll0.016723 0.0 sec0.0 sec0.0 sec 3495 unity-scope-loader poll0.250000 4.0 sec4.0 sec4.0 sec Total 0.266723 the timeout is set to just 4 seconds. Is this heavy polling and repeated inotify watch adding really required? We're trying to get the battery life to last longer and this kind of polling activity just is rather anti-social if it is not necessary. Attached are the results of a 5 minute analysis from the health-check too. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04 Package: libunity9 7.1.4+14.04.20140210-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-21.43-generic 3.13.8 Uname: Linux 3.13.0-21-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.14-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 CurrentDesktop: Unity Date: Thu Apr 3 15:14:14 2014 EcryptfsInUse: Yes InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-03-25 (9 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 14.04 LTS Trusty Tahr - Alpha amd64 (20140323) SourcePackage: libunity UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: libunity (Ubuntu) Importance: High Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug trusty ** Attachment added: health-check-of-unity-scope-loader.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1301984/+attachment/4063306/+files/health-check-of-unity-scope-loader.txt ** Changed in: libunity (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1301984 Title: unity-scope-loader is adding the SAME inotify watches regularly every 4 seconds To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libunity/+bug/1301984/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1302095] [NEW] unity-fallback-mount is perming inotify_watch_add every 4 seconds on the same files
Public bug reported: unity-fallback-mount is polling away doing inotify_watch_add on the same paths every 4 seconds: PID Process Rate/Sec File 30142 unity-fallback-mount0.250 /usr/local/share/applications 30142 unity-fallback-mount0.250 /usr/share/ubuntu/applications This is most probably wasted and unnecessary polling that is keeping the machine from keeping in deep sleep states (e.g. keeping it out of idle). Are these absolutely necessary? ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04 Package: unity-settings-daemon 14.04.0+14.04.20140402-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-21.43-generic 3.13.8 Uname: Linux 3.13.0-21-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.14-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 CurrentDesktop: Unity Date: Thu Apr 3 18:49:31 2014 EcryptfsInUse: Yes InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-03-25 (9 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 14.04 LTS Trusty Tahr - Alpha amd64 (20140323) SourcePackage: unity-settings-daemon UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) upstart.unity-settings-daemon.log: (unity-settings-daemon:2243): color-plugin-WARNING **: failed to connect to device: Failed to connect to missing device /org/freedesktop/ColorManager/devices/cups_Brother_HL_2170W_series ** Affects: unity-settings-daemon (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug trusty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1302095 Title: unity-fallback-mount is perming inotify_watch_add every 4 seconds on the same files To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity-settings-daemon/+bug/1302095/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1300722] [NEW] hud-service is eating up 100% of one of my CPUs in a pool loop
Public bug reported: hud-service is polling like crazy: Context Switches: PID ProcessVoluntary Involuntary Total Ctxt Sw/Sec Ctxt Sw/Sec Ctxt Sw/Sec 2295 hud-service 46084.6342.94 46127.58 (very high) 2325 hud-service 0.09 0.00 0.09 (very low) 2329 hud-service 0.07 0.00 0.07 (very low) 2340 hud-service 0.05 0.00 0.05 (very low) Total 46084.8442.94 46127.78 File I/O operations: No file I/O operations detected. System calls traced: PID Process Syscall CountRate/Sec 2295 hud-service poll 83 23124.8503 2295 hud-service write10 0.2313 2295 hud-service sendmsg 4 0.0925 2325 hud-service restart_syscall 1 0.0231 2329 hud-service restart_syscall 1 0.0231 2340 hud-service restart_syscall 1 0.0231 Total 100 23125.2435 (gdb) where #0 0x7fda8121cfbd in poll () at ../sysdeps/unix/syscall-template.S:81 #1 0x7fda7f1bb4b8 in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdbus-1.so.3 #2 0x7fda7f1ba3ff in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdbus-1.so.3 #3 0x7fda7f1a49dc in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdbus-1.so.3 #4 0x7fda7f1a5464 in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdbus-1.so.3 #5 0x7fda82ce9e65 in ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libQt5DBus.so.5 #6 0x7fda82d2fc64 in ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libQt5DBus.so.5 #7 0x7fda82d30582 in QDBusPendingCallWatcher::waitForFinished() () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libQt5DBus.so.5 #8 0x7fda83eb940b in DBusMenuImporter::slotMenuAboutToShow() () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdbusmenu-qt5.so.2 #9 0x7fda8435d2a6 in QMetaObject::activate(QObject*, int, int, void**) () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libQt5Core.so.5 #10 0x0045ab3f in hud::service::DBusMenuCollector::openMenu(QMenu*, unsigned int) () #11 0x0045abd8 in hud::service::DBusMenuCollector::openMenu(QMenu*, unsigned int) () #12 0x0045abd8 in hud::service::DBusMenuCollector::openMenu(QMenu*, unsigned int) () #13 0x0045abd8 in hud::service::DBusMenuCollector::openMenu(QMenu*, unsigned int) () #14 0x0045abd8 in hud::service::DBusMenuCollector::openMenu(QMenu*, unsigned int) () #15 0x0045abd8 in hud::service::DBusMenuCollector::openMenu(QMenu*, unsigned int) () #16 0x0045ae8d in hud::service::DBusMenuCollector::activate() () #17 0x00441e43 in hud::service::WindowImpl::activate() () #18 0x00439f6a in hud::service::QueryImpl::updateToken(QSharedPointerhud::service::Window) () #19 0x0043a672 in hud::service::QueryImpl::refresh() () #20 0x0044b115 in ?? () #21 0x7fda8435d2a6 in QMetaObject::activate(QObject*, int, int, void**) () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libQt5Core.so.5 #22 0x0045662a in hud::service::ApplicationListImpl::FocusedWindowChanged(unsigned int, QString const, unsigned int) () #23 0x7fda8435d2a6 in QMetaObject::activate(QObject*, int, int, void**) () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libQt5Core.so.5 #24 0x00467361 in ComCanonicalUnityWindowStackInterface::FocusedWindowChanged(unsigned int, QString const, unsigned int) () #25 0x004678bd in ?? () #26 0x00467c63 in ComCanonicalUnityWindowStackInterface::qt_metacall(QMetaObject::Call, int, void**) () #27 0x7fda82cf180f in ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libQt5DBus.so.5 #28 0x7fda8435e22e in QObject::event(QEvent*) () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libQt5Core.so.5 #29 0x7fda823d5c2c in QApplicationPrivate::notify_helper(QObject*, QEvent*) () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libQt5Widgets.so.5 #30 0x7fda823dadf6 in QApplication::notify(QObject*, QEvent*) () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libQt5Widgets.so.5 #31 0x7fda84335c2d in QCoreApplication::notifyInternal(QObject*, QEvent*) () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libQt5Core.so.5 #32 0x7fda84337e07 in QCoreApplicationPrivate::sendPostedEvents(QObject*, int, QThreadData*) () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libQt5Core.so.5 #33 0x7fda84382cd3 in ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libQt5Core.so.5 #34 0x7fda833dbe04 in g_main_context_dispatch () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0 #35 0x7fda833dc048 in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0 ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04 Package: hud 13.10.1+14.04.20140326-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-20.42-generic 3.13.7 Uname: Linux 3.13.0-20-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.14-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 CurrentDesktop: Unity Date: Tue Apr 1 12:23:11 2014 EcryptfsInUse: Yes InstallationDate: Installed on
[Bug 1300722] Re: hud-service is eating up 100% of one of my CPUs in a pool loop
Hi Pete, how do I look that up? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1300722 Title: hud-service is eating up 100% of one of my CPUs in a pool loop To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/hud/+bug/1300722/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1300722] Re: hud-service is eating up 100% of one of my CPUs in a pool loop
What I am seeing is the following poll:
poll([{fd=13, events=POLLIN}], 1, 18813) = 1 ([{fd=13, revents=POLLIN}])
poll([{fd=13, events=POLLIN}], 1, 18813) = 1 ([{fd=13, revents=POLLIN}])
poll([{fd=13, events=POLLIN}], 1, 18813) = 1 ([{fd=13, revents=POLLIN}])
write(3, \1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0, 8) = 8
write(3, \1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0, 8) = 8
write(2, \33[31mvoid DBusMenuImporter::slot..., 335) = 335
write(2, \33[31mbool DBusMenuImporterPrivat..., 300) = 300
write(2, \33[31mvoid DBusMenuImporter::slot..., 115) = 115
sendmsg(13, {msg_name(0)=NULL, msg_iov(2)=[{l\1\0\1
\0\0\0\354\243\2\0r\0\0\0\1\1o\0\33\0\0\0/com/can..., 136},
{n\3\0\0\6\0\0\0opened\0\1s\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0, 32}],
msg_controllen=0, msg_flags=0}, MSG_NOSIGNAL) = 168
sendmsg(13, {msg_name(0)=NULL,
msg_iov(2)=[{l\1\0\1\4\0\0\0\355\243\2\0w\0\0\0\1\1o\0\33\0\0\0/com/can...,
136}, {\f\2\0\0, 4}], msg_controllen=0, msg_flags=0}, MSG_NOSIGNAL) = 140
poll([{fd=13, events=POLLIN}], 1, 25000) = 1 ([{fd=13, revents=POLLIN}])
poll([{fd=13, events=POLLIN}], 1, 25000) = 1 ([{fd=13, revents=POLLIN}])
poll([{fd=13, events=POLLIN}], 1, 25000) = 1 ([{fd=13, revents=POLLIN}])
poll([{fd=13, events=POLLIN}], 1, 25000) = 1 ([{fd=13, revents=POLLIN}])
poll([{fd=13, events=POLLIN}], 1, 25000) = 1 ([{fd=13, revents=POLLIN}])
poll([{fd=13, events=POLLIN}], 1, 25000) = 1 ([{fd=13, revents=POLLIN}])
poll([{fd=13, events=POLLIN}], 1, 25000) = 1 ([{fd=13, revents=POLLIN}])
poll([{fd=13, events=POLLIN}], 1, 25000) = 1 ([{fd=13, revents=POLLIN}])
poll([{fd=13, events=POLLIN}], 1, 25000) = 1 ([{fd=13, revents=POLLIN}])
poll([{fd=13, events=POLLIN}], 1, 25000) = 1 ([{fd=13, revents=POLLIN}])
poll([{fd=13, events=POLLIN}], 1, 25000) = 1 ([{fd=13, revents=POLLIN}])
poll([{fd=13, events=POLLIN}], 1, 25000) = 1 ([{fd=13, revents=POLLIN}])
poll([{fd=13, events=POLLIN}], 1, 25000) = 1 ([{fd=13, revents=POLLIN}])
poll([{fd=13, events=POLLIN}], 1, 24999) = 1 ([{fd=13, revents=POLLIN}])
poll([{fd=13, events=POLLIN}], 1, 24999) = 1 ([{fd=13, revents=POLLIN}])
poll([{fd=13, events=POLLIN}], 1, 24999) = 1 ([{fd=13, revents=POLLIN}])
poll([{fd=13, events=POLLIN}], 1, 24999) = 1 ([{fd=13, revents=POLLIN}])
poll([{fd=13, events=POLLIN}], 1, 24999) = 1 ([{fd=13, revents=POLLIN}])
poll([{fd=13, events=POLLIN}], 1, 24999) = 1 ([{fd=13, revents=POLLIN}])
poll([{fd=13, events=POLLIN}], 1, 24999) = 1 ([{fd=13, revents=POLLIN}])
poll([{fd=13, events=POLLIN}], 1, 24999) = 1 ([{fd=13, revents=POLLIN}])
poll([{fd=13, events=POLLIN}], 1, 24999) = 1 ([{fd=13, revents=POLLIN}])
.. and this repeats and the timeout drops from 25000 milliseconds down
to 1, which is a tad excessive. Polling a gazillion times with sub
millisecond timeout is a little bit antisocial ;-)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1300722
Title:
hud-service is eating up 100% of one of my CPUs in a pool loop
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/hud/+bug/1300722/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1234289] Re: accounts-daemon is progressively causing more wakeups over time
** Changed in: ubuntu-power-consumption Status: New = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1234289 Title: accounts-daemon is progressively causing more wakeups over time To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-power-consumption/+bug/1234289/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1199877] Re: unity-panel-service memory leak and 100% CPU usage
** Changed in: ubuntu-power-consumption Status: New = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1199877 Title: unity-panel-service memory leak and 100% CPU usage To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/indicator-appmenu/+bug/1199877/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1227000] Re: update-notifier is polling every 5 seconds
** Changed in: ubuntu-power-consumption Status: New = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1227000 Title: update-notifier is polling every 5 seconds To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-power-consumption/+bug/1227000/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1246947] Re: fwts-efi-runtime-dkms 0.26.08-0ubuntu1: fwts-efi-runtime-dkms kernel module failed to build
I fail to see why this is a fwts bug -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1246947 Title: fwts-efi-runtime-dkms 0.26.08-0ubuntu1: fwts-efi-runtime-dkms kernel module failed to build To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fwts/+bug/1246947/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1297670] Re: [Dell XPS13 9333] klog, method: Critical Failures
This Detected error 'Type' issues is now fixed in fwts 14.03.01 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1297670 Title: [Dell XPS13 9333] klog, method: Critical Failures To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fwts/+bug/1297670/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1294669] Re: bash crashed with SIGABRT in programming_error()
Yes, that's a reproducer for me too. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1294669 Title: bash crashed with SIGABRT in programming_error() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bash/+bug/1294669/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1294669] Re: bash crashed with SIGABRT in programming_error()
so it appears the ! token is the culprit at a guess:
ps = {parser_state = 524288, token_state = 0x1629768, token = 0x11f4008 !,
token_buffer_size = 1520, input_line_terminator = 0, eof_encountered = 0,
prompt_string_pointer = 0x6fc920 ps1_prompt, current_command_line_count = 0,
remember_on_history = 1, history_expansion_inhibited = 0,
last_command_exit_value = 1, pipestatus = 0x11fd588, last_shell_builtin = 0x0,
this_shell_builtin = 0x0, expand_aliases = 1, echo_input_at_read = 0}
#14 0x00420e43 in parse_command () at .././eval.c:231
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1294669
Title:
bash crashed with SIGABRT in programming_error()
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bash/+bug/1294669/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1297670] Re: [Dell XPS13 9333] klog, method: Critical Failures
You can ignore the following: FAILED [CRITICAL] AETtype: Test 107, Detected error 'Type' when evaluating '\_SB_.ADP0._PCL'. That was due to a bug in fwts (see bug 1297323) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1297670 Title: [Dell XPS13 9333] klog, method: Critical Failures To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fwts/+bug/1297670/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1292021] Re: gconfd-2 is polling every 30 seconds calling periodic_cleanup_timeout
Perhaps I've made a mistake; I guess I wanted the fix for gconfd-2 as this is a little busy: http://ci.ubuntu.com/power/eventstat/image/3105/machine/1/task/gconfd-2/details/ Have I sent a fix for the wrong package? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1292021 Title: gconfd-2 is polling every 30 seconds calling periodic_cleanup_timeout To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gconf/+bug/1292021/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1292674] Re: virt-manager.py is being exec'd every second when running virt-manager
OK, so it's rather a heavyweight way to bump statistics. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1292674 Title: virt-manager.py is being exec'd every second when running virt-manager To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/virt-manager/+bug/1292674/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1294669] Re: bash crashed with SIGABRT in programming_error()
I did a clean install of Trusty yesterday and I will keep track to see if this issue occurs again. It seemed to happen only when I had been very busy in bash and had done a bunch of cursor-up repeated commands and somehow it just died under me. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1294669 Title: bash crashed with SIGABRT in programming_error() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bash/+bug/1294669/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1289532] Re: NetworkManager is polling every 4 seconds on the Desktop looking for /var/lib/ofono
I've got some stats to show how this is now one of the top wake-up offending processes on the desktop now: http://ci.ubuntu.com/power/eventstat/image/3105/machine/1/task/NetworkManager/details/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1289532 Title: NetworkManager is polling every 4 seconds on the Desktop looking for /var/lib/ofono To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager-applet/+bug/1289532/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1289532] Re: NetworkManager is polling every 4 seconds on the Desktop looking for /var/lib/ofono
So, I think this could be classed as a regression in Trusty. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1289532 Title: NetworkManager is polling every 4 seconds on the Desktop looking for /var/lib/ofono To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager-applet/+bug/1289532/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1292021] Re: gconfd-2 is polling every 30 seconds calling periodic_cleanup_timeout
@Sebastien, I messed around with a concept of a fix, https://code.launchpad.net /~colin-king/gconf/lp-1292021 - however I'm not sufficiently experienced to know how to get this fix into the package, so I'd prefer if the desktop team could handle it for me. Is that OK? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1292021 Title: gconfd-2 is polling every 30 seconds calling periodic_cleanup_timeout To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gconf/+bug/1292021/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1296270] Re: Have to login twice after suspending
I wonder if suspend is being triggered twice. How are you suspending the machine? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1296270 Title: Have to login twice after suspending To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1296270/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1294729] Re: BUG: pcmC1D0c:0, pos = 5461, buffer size = 5461, period size = 2730
I've reverted commit 25cb36334e92312684f5cc18bfcf1eb96eb00485 and put test kernel packages in: http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~cking/lp-1294729 Do you mind testing the appropriate 32 or 64 bit kernels and letting me know if this resolves the issue for you? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1294729 Title: BUG: pcmC1D0c:0, pos = 5461, buffer size = 5461, period size = 2730 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1294729/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1286866] Re: BUG: pcmC1D0c:0, pos = 5461, buffer size = 5461, period size = 2730
This looks like the same bug 1294729 I've reverted commit 25cb36334e92312684f5cc18bfcf1eb96eb00485 and put test kernel packages in: http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~cking/lp-1294729 Do you mind testing the appropriate 32 or 64 bit kernels and letting me know if this resolves the issue for you? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1286866 Title: BUG: pcmC1D0c:0, pos = 5461, buffer size = 5461, period size = 2730 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1286866/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1293825] Re: BUG: pcmC1D0c:0, pos = 5461, buffer size = 5461, period size = 2730
This looks like the same bug 1294729 I've reverted commit 25cb36334e92312684f5cc18bfcf1eb96eb00485 and put test kernel packages in: http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~cking/lp-1294729 Do you mind testing the appropriate 32 or 64 bit kernels and letting me know if this resolves the issue for you? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1293825 Title: BUG: pcmC1D0c:0, pos = 5461, buffer size = 5461, period size = 2730 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1293825/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1294896] Re: “start on dbus” condition may start thermald too early
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1294895 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1294895 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1294895 “start on dbus” condition may start thermald too early -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1294896 Title: “start on dbus” condition may start thermald too early To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thermald/+bug/1294896/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1294729] Re: BUG: pcmC1D0c:0, pos = 5461, buffer size = 5461, period size = 2730
@Len, do you mind just double checking you are running that installed version, using uname -a ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Colin King (colin-king) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1294729 Title: BUG: pcmC1D0c:0, pos = 5461, buffer size = 5461, period size = 2730 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1294729/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1294729] Re: BUG: pcmC1D0c:0, pos = 5461, buffer size = 5461, period size = 2730
Can you attach /etc/pulse/daemon.conf to the bug report. We're seeing audio buffer overruns, so it would be useful to see what the pulse audio settings are. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1294729 Title: BUG: pcmC1D0c:0, pos = 5461, buffer size = 5461, period size = 2730 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1294729/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1292674] Re: virt-manager.py is being exec'd every second when running virt-manager
This is happening under Unity on Trusty. I'm starting virt-manager from the launcher. I have nothing in ~/.init ls -al ~/.local/share/applications total 28 drwxrwxr-x 3 king king 4096 Jan 29 15:12 . drwx-- 36 king king 4096 Mar 19 09:19 .. -rw-rw-r-- 1 king king 185 Nov 24 2012 BBCNewsbbccouk.desktop -rw-rw-r-- 1 king king 253 Jan 29 15:12 GoogleCalendargooglecom.desktop -rw-r--r-- 1 king king 266 Oct 29 17:30 Landscapelandscapecanonicalcom.desktop -rw-rw-r-- 1 king king 1198 Jan 5 15:55 mimeapps.list drwxrwxr-x 3 king king 4096 Mar 16 2012 wine there relating to virt manager either. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1292674 Title: virt-manager.py is being exec'd every second when running virt-manager To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/virt-manager/+bug/1292674/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1294234] [NEW] ubiquity installer crashed installing on a UEFI based intel SDP
Private bug reported: Installing with today's AMD64 Trusty ISO image the installer crashed. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04 Package: ubiquity 2.17.9 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-18.38-generic 3.13.6 Uname: Linux 3.13.0-18-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.13.3-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 CasperVersion: 1.338 Date: Tue Mar 18 17:27:32 2014 InstallCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/casper/vmlinuz.efi file=/cdrom/preseed/ubuntu.seed boot=casper only-ubiquity quiet splash -- LiveMediaBuild: Ubuntu 14.04 LTS Trusty Tahr - Alpha amd64 (20140318) ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_GB.UTF-8 TERM=linux PATH=(custom, no user) XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=set LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 SourcePackage: ubiquity UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: ubiquity (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Dimitri John Ledkov (xnox) Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug trusty ubiquity-2.17.9 ubuntu ** Information type changed from Public to Private ** Changed in: ubiquity (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Dimitri John Ledkov (xnox) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1294234 Title: ubiquity installer crashed installing on a UEFI based intel SDP To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1294234/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1292911] Re: firefox is pegging 2 CPUs at nearly 100%
** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1292911 Title: firefox is pegging 2 CPUs at nearly 100% To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1292911/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1292911] [NEW] firefox is pegging 2 CPUs at nearly 100%
Public bug reported:
Top is showing that 2 CPUs are being consumed at nearly 100% each:
PID USER PR NIVIRTRESSHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
3916 king 20 0 1160372 264036 50188 S 198.7 4.5 36:54.78 firefox
Seems like it is spinning in pthread_cond_wait()
(gdb) where
#0 pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 () at
../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/pthread_cond_wait.S:185
#1 0x7fefa1de3f28 in PR_WaitCondVar () from /usr/lib/firefox/libnspr4.so
#2 0x7fefa1de4218 in PR_Wait () from /usr/lib/firefox/libnspr4.so
#3 0x7fef9dfdd172 in ?? () from /usr/lib/firefox/libxul.so
#4 0x7fef9dfde17d in ?? () from /usr/lib/firefox/libxul.so
#5 0x7fef9e99e0ae in ?? () from /usr/lib/firefox/libxul.so
#6 0x7fef9e99e0cd in ?? () from /usr/lib/firefox/libxul.so
#7 0x7fef9dfa421b in ?? () from /usr/lib/firefox/libxul.so
#8 0x7fef9e99e387 in ?? () from /usr/lib/firefox/libxul.so
#9 0x7fef9e99e3c3 in ?? () from /usr/lib/firefox/libxul.so
#10 0x7fef9dfbf2b6 in ?? () from /usr/lib/firefox/libxul.so
#11 0x7fef9dfbf88a in ?? () from /usr/lib/firefox/libxul.so
#12 0x7fef9dfa70a0 in ?? () from /usr/lib/firefox/libxul.so
#13 0x7fef9eeba08f in ?? () from /usr/lib/firefox/libxul.so
#14 0x7fef9eebe940 in ?? () from /usr/lib/firefox/libxul.so
#15 0x7fef9eebeb5a in XRE_main () from /usr/lib/firefox/libxul.so
#16 0x7fefa33503c1 in _start ()
(gdb) quit
..and looks like it's possibly spinning on a futex
System calls traced:
PID Process Syscall CountRate/SecTotal
μSecs % Call Time
3916 firefox futex 1 0.0167
0 0.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04
Package: firefox 28.0+build1-0ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-16.36-lowlatency 3.13.5
Uname: Linux 3.13.0-16-lowlatency x86_64
AddonCompatCheckDisabled: False
ApportVersion: 2.13.3-0ubuntu1
Architecture: amd64
AudioDevicesInUse:
USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
/dev/snd/controlC0: king 3531 F pulseaudio
BrokenPermissions:
sessionstore.bak (0o600, wrong owner)
sessionstore.js (0o600, wrong owner)
BuildID: 20140313141126
Channel: Unavailable
CurrentDesktop: Unity
Date: Sat Mar 15 16:32:27 2014
EcryptfsInUse: Yes
ForcedLayersAccel: False
IfupdownConfig:
# interfaces(5) file used by ifup(8) and ifdown(8)
auto lo
iface lo inet loopback
IncompatibleExtensions:
English (GB) Language Pack - langpack-en...@firefox.mozilla.org
English (South Africa) Language Pack - langpack-en...@firefox.mozilla.org
Default - {972ce4c6-7e08-4474-a285-3208198ce6fd}
InstallationDate: Installed on 2013-12-09 (95 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 14.04 LTS Trusty Tahr - Alpha amd64 (20131209)
IpRoute:
default via 192.168.0.1 dev eth0 proto static
192.168.0.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.0.14 metric 1
192.168.0.0/24 dev wlan0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.0.20 metric 9
192.168.122.0/24 dev virbr0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.122.1
MostRecentCrashID: bp-77eb6b98-c032-4092-a561-b70f22130104
PrefSources: prefs.js
Profiles: Profile0 (Default) - LastVersion=28.0/20140313141126
RelatedPackageVersions:
rhythmbox-mozilla 3.0.1-1ubuntu15
google-talkplugin 5.1.5.0-1
totem-mozilla 3.10.1-1ubuntu3
RfKill:
0: phy0: Wireless LAN
Soft blocked: no
Hard blocked: no
RunningIncompatibleAddons: True
SourcePackage: firefox
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
WifiSyslog: Mar 15 16:30:27 lenovo kernel: [ 1278.310072] ptrace of pid 3916
was attempted by: gdb (pid 5412)
dmi.bios.date: 05/24/2012
dmi.bios.vendor: LENOVO
dmi.bios.version: G2ET31WW (1.11 )
dmi.board.asset.tag: Not Available
dmi.board.name: 2320CTO
dmi.board.vendor: LENOVO
dmi.board.version: Not Available
dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Information
dmi.chassis.type: 10
dmi.chassis.vendor: LENOVO
dmi.chassis.version: Not Available
dmi.modalias:
dmi:bvnLENOVO:bvrG2ET31WW(1.11):bd05/24/2012:svnLENOVO:pn2320CTO:pvrThinkPadX230:rvnLENOVO:rn2320CTO:rvrNotAvailable:cvnLENOVO:ct10:cvrNotAvailable:
dmi.product.name: 2320CTO
dmi.product.version: ThinkPad X230
dmi.sys.vendor: LENOVO
** Affects: firefox (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags: amd64 apport-bug trusty
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1292911
Title:
firefox is pegging 2 CPUs at nearly 100%
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1292911/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1279388] Re: [MIR] thermald
And docs are now: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/PowerManagement/ThermalIssues -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1279388 Title: [MIR] thermald To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thermald/+bug/1279388/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1292674] [NEW] virt-manager.py is being exec'd every second when running virt-manager
Public bug reported: I've been trying to track down processes that keep the system busy and found that when running virt-manager virt-manager.py is being exec'd every second from the init --user process: 19:19:33 fork: parent pid 3037 (init --user) 19:19:33- child pid 22112 (python /usr/share/virt-manager/virt-manager.py) 19:19:33 exit: 0 pid 22112 (python /usr/share/virt-manager/virt-manager.py) 19:19:34 fork: parent pid 3037 (init --user) 19:19:34- child pid 22113 (python /usr/share/virt-manager/virt-manager.py) 19:19:34 exit: 0 pid 22113 (python /usr/share/virt-manager/virt-manager.py) 19:19:35 fork: parent pid 3037 (init --user) 19:19:35- child pid 22114 (python /usr/share/virt-manager/virt-manager.py) 19:19:35 exit: 0 pid 22114 (python /usr/share/virt-manager/virt-manager.py) 19:19:36 fork: parent pid 3037 (init --user) 19:19:36- child pid 22115 (python /usr/share/virt-manager/virt-manager.py) 19:19:36 exit: 0 pid 22115 (python /usr/share/virt-manager/virt-manager.py) 19:19:37 fork: parent pid 3037 (init --user) 19:19:37- child pid 22116 (python /usr/share/virt-manager/virt-manager.py) 19:19:37 exit: 0 pid 22116 (python /usr/share/virt-manager/virt-manager.py) 19:19:38 fork: parent pid 3037 (init --user) 19:19:38- child pid 22117 (python /usr/share/virt-manager/virt-manager.py) 19:19:38 exit: 0 pid 22117 (python /usr/share/virt-manager/virt-manager.py) The script seems to be executing very quickly and terminating almost immediately. However, is it really necessary for this python script to be exec'd every second? It seems a little bit over the top. ** Affects: virt-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1292674 Title: virt-manager.py is being exec'd every second when running virt-manager To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/virt-manager/+bug/1292674/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1279388] Re: [MIR] thermald
thermald rc2-10 now contains these outstanding fixes (execept for the Android specific issues that don't apply to the build in Ubuntu): https://launchpadlibrarian.net/169341284/thermald_1.1~rc2-8_1.1~rc2-10.diff.gz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1279388 Title: [MIR] thermald To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thermald/+bug/1279388/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1292021] [NEW] gconfd-2 is polling every 30 seconds calling periodic_cleanup_timeout
Public bug reported: I'm trying to reduce the amount of system activity to keep power usage down, and I've noticed that gconfd-2 is calling periodic_cleanup_timeout() every 30 seconds. This seems a little excessive and I am sure that doubling the polling interval won't impact the responsiveness of the daemon. I am suggesting that the polling time is doubled to 60 seconds. ** Affects: gconf (Ubuntu) Importance: Low Assignee: Colin King (colin-king) Status: In Progress ** Changed in: gconf (Ubuntu) Status: New = In Progress ** Changed in: gconf (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Low ** Changed in: gconf (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Colin King (colin-king) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1292021 Title: gconfd-2 is polling every 30 seconds calling periodic_cleanup_timeout To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gconf/+bug/1292021/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1266885] Re: rtkit-daemon canary and watchdog threads could be less busy to save wakeups
** Changed in: rtkit (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Medium ** Changed in: ubuntu-power-consumption Importance: Undecided = Medium ** Changed in: rtkit (Ubuntu) Milestone: None = ubuntu-14.04 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1266885 Title: rtkit-daemon canary and watchdog threads could be less busy to save wakeups To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-power-consumption/+bug/1266885/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1279388] Re: [MIR] thermald
Thanks Seth. I've fixed up the outstanding issues and send patches upstream as well as a few more minor memory leaks I found using some different static code analysers. I'll try and get these fixes into the next release of thermald and uploaded in a few more days once upstream has sanity checked them. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1279388 Title: [MIR] thermald To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thermald/+bug/1279388/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1279388] Re: [MIR] thermald
Thanks Seth for that very instructive list of issues. I will work on these as soon as I can next week. BTW, what is the suggested correct way to daemonize? Any examples I can look at? Thanks again! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1279388 Title: [MIR] thermald To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thermald/+bug/1279388/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 955287] Re: Ubuntu should handle hot CPUs by taking preemptive action and warning users
thermald is the defacto solution to this in Trusty+, I've added a Wikipage to describe how to install and configure this daemon: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/PowerManagement/ThermalIssues I think this addresses the bug, so I'm going to close it. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/955287 Title: Ubuntu should handle hot CPUs by taking preemptive action and warning users To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/955287/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 955287] Re: Ubuntu should handle hot CPUs by taking preemptive action and warning users
On 07/03/14 10:23, James Hunt wrote: Hi Colin - thanks, yes running thermald has improved the situation immensely! I do still very occasionally see overheats, although they are extremely rare now and I suspect may be more related to my fans needing a clean :-) One can tweak the default thermald config to start throttling back at a lower temperature if required. So it may need some machine specific modification if it keeps on occurring. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/955287 Title: Ubuntu should handle hot CPUs by taking preemptive action and warning users To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/955287/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1289311] [NEW] kerneloops is waking up relatively frequently to check for kernel oops which contributes to keeping system from deep sleep
Public bug reported: Currently kerneloops is polling every 10 seconds to find a kernel oops message. I think this is a little excessive for something that occurs infrequently. How about increading the poll timeout to every 60 seconds? ** Affects: kerneloops (Ubuntu) Importance: Low Assignee: Colin King (colin-king) Status: In Progress ** Changed in: kerneloops (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Low ** Changed in: kerneloops (Ubuntu) Status: New = In Progress ** Changed in: kerneloops (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Colin King (colin-king) ** Description changed: Currently kerneloops is polling every 10 seconds to find a kernel oops message. I think this is a little excessive for something that occurs - infrequently. How about reducing this to every 60 seconds? + infrequently. How about increading the poll timeout to every 60 + seconds? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1289311 Title: kerneloops is waking up relatively frequently to check for kernel oops which contributes to keeping system from deep sleep To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kerneloops/+bug/1289311/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 934156] Re: zeitgeist-datahub is calling inotify_add_watch() on .kde RecentDocuments every 4 seconds and failing
OK, it's got worse in Trusty, now it's polling even more directories
that don't exist:
inotify_add_watch(9, /usr/local/share/applications,
IN_MODIFY|IN_ATTRIB|IN_CLOSE_WRITE|IN_MOVED_FROM|IN_MOVED_TO|IN_CREATE|IN_DELETE|IN_DELETE_SELF|IN_MOVE_SELF|IN_UNMOUNT|IN_ONLYDIR)
= -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
inotify_add_watch(9, /usr/share/ubuntu/applications,
IN_MODIFY|IN_ATTRIB|IN_CLOSE_WRITE|IN_MOVED_FROM|IN_MOVED_TO|IN_CREATE|IN_DELETE|IN_DELETE_SELF|IN_MOVE_SELF|IN_UNMOUNT|IN_ONLYDIR)
= -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
inotify_add_watch(9, /home/king/.kde/share/apps/RecentDocuments,
IN_MODIFY|IN_ATTRIB|IN_CLOSE_WRITE|IN_MOVED_FROM|IN_MOVED_TO|IN_CREATE|IN_DELETE|IN_DELETE_SELF|IN_MOVE_SELF|IN_UNMOUNT|IN_ONLYDIR)
= -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
poll([{fd=10, events=POLLIN}, {fd=9, events=POLLIN}], 2, 3997) = 0 (Timeout)
Why does this have to be every 4 seconds? That's sucking power on an
idle system.
** Changed in: zeitgeist (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = High
** Changed in: ubuntu-power-consumption
Importance: Undecided = High
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/934156
Title:
zeitgeist-datahub is calling inotify_add_watch() on .kde
RecentDocuments every 4 seconds and failing
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-power-consumption/+bug/934156/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1289532] [NEW] NetworkManager is polling every 4 seconds on the Desktop looking for /var/lib/ofono
Public bug reported:
I was looking at what's sucking power on the Trusty desktop and found
that NetworkManager is polling every 4 seconds adding an inotify watch
on /var/lib/ofono (which does not exist on the desktop - isn't that a
phone related component?).
Anyhow, strace on one of the threads of NetworkManager shows:
sudo strace -p 710
Process 710 attached
restart_syscall(... resuming interrupted call ...) = 0
inotify_add_watch(8, /var/lib/ofono,
IN_MODIFY|IN_ATTRIB|IN_CLOSE_WRITE|IN_MOVED_FROM|IN_MOVED_TO|IN_CREATE|IN_DELETE|IN_DELETE_SELF|IN_MOVE_SELF|IN_UNMOUNT|IN_ONLYDIR)
= -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
poll([{fd=9, events=POLLIN}, {fd=8, events=POLLIN}], 2, 3996) = 0 (Timeout)
inotify_add_watch(8, /var/lib/ofono,
IN_MODIFY|IN_ATTRIB|IN_CLOSE_WRITE|IN_MOVED_FROM|IN_MOVED_TO|IN_CREATE|IN_DELETE|IN_DELETE_SELF|IN_MOVE_SELF|IN_UNMOUNT|IN_ONLYDIR)
= -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
poll([{fd=9, events=POLLIN}, {fd=8, events=POLLIN}], 2, 3995) = 0 (Timeout)
inotify_add_watch(8, /var/lib/ofono,
IN_MODIFY|IN_ATTRIB|IN_CLOSE_WRITE|IN_MOVED_FROM|IN_MOVED_TO|IN_CREATE|IN_DELETE|IN_DELETE_SELF|IN_MOVE_SELF|IN_UNMOUNT|IN_ONLYDIR)
= -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
poll([{fd=9, events=POLLIN}, {fd=8, events=POLLIN}], 2, 3995) = 0 (Timeout)
inotify_add_watch(8, /var/lib/ofono,
IN_MODIFY|IN_ATTRIB|IN_CLOSE_WRITE|IN_MOVED_FROM|IN_MOVED_TO|IN_CREATE|IN_DELETE|IN_DELETE_SELF|IN_MOVE_SELF|IN_UNMOUNT|IN_ONLYDIR)
= -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
So:
1. The polling is rather heavy - every 4 seconds? Is that really necessary?
2. Surely we can avoid repeatedly adding a watch on a directory that does not
exist. Are there better ways than doing this so frequently, especially because
it does not seem relevant on my desktop install.
Anyhow, can this be investigated, it's one of the final big causes of
wakeups on an idle desktop image.
** Affects: network-manager-applet (Ubuntu)
Importance: High
Status: New
** Changed in: network-manager-applet (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = High
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1289532
Title:
NetworkManager is polling every 4 seconds on the Desktop looking for
/var/lib/ofono
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager-applet/+bug/1289532/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1287109] [NEW] kernel oops suffers from memory leak and unchecked heap allocations
Public bug reported: I run cppcheck on kerneloops and found a few issues: * A memory leak in writefunction() * Various unchecked heap allocations - allocs that fail return null causing null pointer dereferencing and hence segfaults ** Affects: kerneloops (Ubuntu) Importance: Medium Assignee: Colin King (colin-king) Status: In Progress ** Changed in: kerneloops (Ubuntu) Status: New = In Progress ** Changed in: kerneloops (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Colin King (colin-king) ** Changed in: kerneloops (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1287109 Title: kernel oops suffers from memory leak and unchecked heap allocations To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kerneloops/+bug/1287109/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1285667] [NEW] installer sets incorrect boot path on UEFI system with SSD
Private bug reported:
After installation on a UEFI enabled system, the boot path in the Boot*
variable is set to:
\HARDDRIVE(1,MBR,4ed80301,0,0)\FILE('\EFI\ubuntu\shimx64.efi').
However, the actual boot path should be:
\ACPI(0xa0341d0,0x0)\PCI(0x0,0x1)\PCI(0x0,0x0)\NVMEXPRESS(0x1,0x0)
I'm pretty sure this worked when I tested it a month or two back, so I'm
not sure what's changed.
The target drive is an NVME SSD.
** Affects: grub-installer (Ubuntu)
Importance: High
Assignee: Dimitri John Ledkov (xnox)
Status: New
** Information type changed from Public to Private
** Description changed:
After installation on a UEFI enabled system, the boot path in the Boot*
variable is set to:
- \HARDDRIVE(1,MBR,4ed80301,0,0)\FILE('\EFI\ubuntu\shimx64.efi').
+ \HARDDRIVE(1,MBR,4ed80301,0,0)\FILE('\EFI\ubuntu\shimx64.efi').
However, the actual boot path should be:
\ACPI(0xa0341d0,0x0)\PCI(0x0,0x1)\PCI(0x0,0x0)\NVMEXPRESS(0x1,0x0)
I'm pretty sure this worked when I tested it a month or two back, so I'm
not sure what's changed.
+
+ The target drive is an NVME SSD.
** Changed in: grub-installer (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = High
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1285667
Title:
installer sets incorrect boot path on UEFI system with SSD
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub-installer/+bug/1285667/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1279388] Re: [MIR] thermald
Seth, any progress on the review? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1279388 Title: [MIR] thermald To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thermald/+bug/1279388/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1284572] Re: [Lenovo B490s] fwts: FAILED [HIGH] DevConfigDiffAfterS4
So it looks like the PCI base address registers in the PCI config space for device PCI: :01:00.0, VID: de:40, Class: 03:02 (3D controller) are changing. That need further inspection.. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1284572 Title: [Lenovo B490s] fwts: FAILED [HIGH] DevConfigDiffAfterS4 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-lts-saucy/+bug/1284572/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1279388] [NEW] [MIR] thermald
Public bug reported: Thermald is a userspace daemon that monitors and controls temperatures on x86 devices such as laptops, PCs and servers. It detects if a system has reached a specific temperature and will active various available cooling controls/methods to try and cool the system. Thermald also allows user defined per-system configuration to tweak CPU cooling policy which is useful on hardware that has poor BIOS controlled thermal management or suffers from thermal overrun due to poor cooling design. With the move to using the more efficient intel_pstate driver, CPUs are sometimes driven harder than previous CPU governors so it is also helpful to use thermald in conjunction with this kernel configuration to ensure CPU thermal overrun does not occur. With the kernel moving to the intel_pstate driver by default it makes sense for thermald to be installed on x86 specific H/W to perform better thermal control. Below are all the answers to the UbuntuMainInclusionRequirements sections. I will highlight the following known violations: 1) a debian/watch does not currently exist with this package. As I am the Debian maintainer I will add this next time I upload the package (hopefully by end of this week) 2) as this is a daemon, the package needs extra scrutiny from the Security folks Below are my answers to the various main inclusion requirements, marked by a * prefix: Thermald MIR checklist (Wed Feb 12 15:21:08 GMT 2014) Availability: The package must already be in the Ubuntu universe, and must build for the architectures it is designed to work on. * Yes - http://packages.ubuntu.com/trusty/admin/thermald Rationale: There must be a certain level of demand for the package, for example: The package is useful for a large part of our user base. * Yes - x86 users (i386, amd64) and will ensure CPUs don't overheat, works in conjunction with intel_pstate CPU governor and RAPL. The package is a new build dependency or dependency of a package that we already support (additionally, the official image builder requires all used packages be in main). * Yes, the Trusty kernel with intel_pstate enabled The package helps meet a specific Blueprint goal. * Yes, Overall goal of improved power management and reducing thermal overrun The package replaces another package we currently support and promises higher quality and/or better features, so that we can drop the old package from the supported set. * Not applicable Security: The security history and the current state of security issues in the package must allow us to support the package for at least 18 months without exposing its users to an inappropriate level of security risks. This requires checking of several things that are explained in detail in the subsection Security checks. Quality assurance: After installing the package it must be possible to make it working with a reasonable effort of configuration and documentation reading. * Will auto start as a daemon, can be stopped/start like any typical daemon. * Man page is provided covering all the features * Thermnald works with zero configuration mode by default. There is an XML configuration file for user defined configuration tweaks if a system has buggy or broken ACPI or for finer tuning. This is also documented in the provided man pages. The package must not ask debconf questions higher than medium if it is going to be installed by default. The debconf questions must have reasonable defaults. * Does not apply. There are no long-term outstanding bugs which affect the usability of the program to a major degree. To support a package, we must be reasonably convinced that upstream supports and cares for the package. * No long term bugs, it is a relatively new package * I have been working with upstream (Intel) and I have a good working relationship with the lead developer. Fixes land within 2-3 days into the main repository and developer is responsive to bug reports/fixes. The status of important bugs in Debian's, Ubuntu's, and upstream's bug tracking systems must be evaluated. Links to these bug trackers need to be provided in the MIR report. Important bugs must be pointed out and discussed in the MIR report. Bug reports: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=thermald;dist=unstable Project bug tracker: https://github.com/01org/thermal_daemon/issues Resolved bugs in Debian: * 737093 thermald: deamon eats 100 percent CPU time * 734832 thermald exits why trying to use systemd init * 738719 thermald install and improve systemd init (fixed 12th Feb 2014) * 734786 thermald: FTBFSL No rule to make target `man/thermald.1` The package is maintained well in Debian/Ubuntu (check out the Debian PTS) * Yes (by Colin King) http://packages.qa.debian.org/t/thermald.html May need some other input on this as I'm speaking for myself. The package should not deal with exotic
[Bug 1265156] Re: [HP Pavilion 15] CRITICAL/HIGH failures found in fwts report
I'm now confused, I ran fwts 14.01.01 against the ACPI tables in this bug and I don't see those errors at all: fwts --dumpfile=AcpiTables.txt method - see attached file ** Attachment added: results.log https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-lts-raring/+bug/1265156/+attachment/3975926/+files/results.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1265156 Title: [HP Pavilion 15] CRITICAL/HIGH failures found in fwts report To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-lts-raring/+bug/1265156/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1276524] [NEW] mumble reports undefined symbol: _ZN6google8protobuf18GoogleOnceInitImplEPlPNS0_7ClosureE
Public bug reported: After pulling in some updates today into Trusty, I can no longer start mumble. I see the error: mumble: symbol lookup error: mumble: undefined symbol: _ZN6google8protobuf18GoogleOnceInitImplEPlPNS0_7ClosureE This may be related to a new version of protobuf that breaks mumble, see http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=737223 ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04 Package: mumble 1.2.4-0.1ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-5.20-generic 3.13.0 Uname: Linux 3.13.0-5-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.13.2-0ubuntu2 Architecture: amd64 CurrentDesktop: Unity Date: Wed Feb 5 10:05:02 2014 EcryptfsInUse: Yes InstallationDate: Installed on 2013-12-09 (57 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 14.04 LTS Trusty Tahr - Alpha amd64 (20131209) SourcePackage: mumble UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: mumble (Ubuntu) Importance: Medium Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug trusty ** Changed in: mumble (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1276524 Title: mumble reports undefined symbol: _ZN6google8protobuf18GoogleOnceInitImplEPlPNS0_7ClosureE To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mumble/+bug/1276524/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1276524] Re: mumble reports undefined symbol: _ZN6google8protobuf18GoogleOnceInitImplEPlPNS0_7ClosureE
The latest protobuf update has now fixed this issue. ** Changed in: mumble (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1276524 Title: mumble reports undefined symbol: _ZN6google8protobuf18GoogleOnceInitImplEPlPNS0_7ClosureE To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mumble/+bug/1276524/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1251065]
Created attachment 93360 tarball of dmesg output and Xorg.0.log Attached is dmesg.log and Xorg.0.log tarball using today's drm-intel- nightly. S3 resume still results in a blank screen. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1251065 Title: HP Mini 1000 fails to resume from suspend To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/1251065/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 955287] Re: Ubuntu should handle hot CPUs by taking preemptive action and warning users
One can use a thermald helper script to set the CPU Max temperature on your machine. Attached is the script, one has to specify the max temp in milli degrees C, so for 80 degress C, enter 8, example: sudo ./thermald_set_pref.sh [sudo] password for king: thermald preference 0 : DEFAULT 1 : PERFORMANCE 2 : ENERGY_CONSERVE 3 : DISABLED 4 : CALIBRATE 5 : SET USER DEFINED CPU MAX temp 6 : TERMINATE Enter thermald preference [1..6]: 5 Enter valid max temp in mill degree celsius 8 ** Attachment added: thermald management script https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/955287/+attachment/3968543/+files/thermald_set_pref.sh -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/955287 Title: Ubuntu should handle hot CPUs by taking preemptive action and warning users To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/955287/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1275985] Re: [Firmware Bug]: ACPI: BIOS _OSI(Linux) query ignored
This is a warning that the BIOS has implemented OSI(Linux) and the kernel ignores this, and reports this message. It can be ignored. From drivers/acpi/osl.c, the comment states: * From pre-history through Linux-2.6.22, * Linux responded TRUE upon a BIOS OSI(Linux) query. * * Unfortunately, reference BIOS writers got wind of this * and put OSI(Linux) in their example code, quickly exposing * this string as ill-conceived and opening the door to * an un-bounded number of BIOS incompatibilities. * * For example, OSI(Linux) was used on resume to re-POST a * video card on one system, because Linux at that time * could not do a speedy restore in its native driver. * But then upon gaining quick native restore capability, * Linux has no way to tell the BIOS to skip the time-consuming * POST -- putting Linux at a permanent performance disadvantage. * On another system, the BIOS writer used OSI(Linux) * to infer native OS support for IPMI! On other systems, * OSI(Linux) simply got in the way of Linux claiming to * be compatible with other operating systems, exposing * BIOS issues such as skipped device initialization. * * So Linux turned out to be a really poor chose of * OSI string, and from Linux-2.6.23 onward we respond FALSE. * * BIOS writers should NOT query _OSI(Linux) on future systems. * Linux will complain on the console when it sees it, and return FALSE. * To get Linux to return TRUE for your system will require * a kernel source update to add a DMI entry, * or boot with acpi_osi=Linux So it can be ignored; the warning is just the kernel complaining about a feature that is ignored. Marking this as won't fix. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1275985 Title: [Firmware Bug]: ACPI: BIOS _OSI(Linux) query ignored To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/1275985/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 955287] Re: Ubuntu should handle hot CPUs by taking preemptive action and warning users
Hmm, I'm not sure why you need to unload the thinkpad acpi driver. Can you force fan control mode with options thinkpad_acpi fan_control=1 in a /etc/modprobe.d/ .conf file and this will configure the driver at boot time. I also suggest enabling the intel-pstate driver. Ubuntu currently has a patch to turn this off by default, and it can be enabled by changing /etc/default/grub and set the following: GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT=quiet splash intel_pstate=enable then run: sudo update-grub and reboot. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/955287 Title: Ubuntu should handle hot CPUs by taking preemptive action and warning users To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/955287/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 955287] Re: Ubuntu should handle hot CPUs by taking preemptive action and warning users
@James, I've now packaged up thermald for Trusty, which will do auto throttling if the CPU is too hot. Perhaps you can give that a spin. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/955287 Title: Ubuntu should handle hot CPUs by taking preemptive action and warning users To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/955287/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1251065]
I tried today's drm-intel-nightly and all I get is a black screen, spinning CPU and I can't ssh in to see what's happening. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1251065 Title: HP Mini 1000 fails to resume from suspend To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/1251065/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1251065]
Today's mainline kernel (top commit 85ce70fdf48aa290b4845311c2dd815d7f8d1fa5) [ 241.352344] INFO: task systemd-udevd:381 blocked for more than 120 seconds. [ 241.352420] Tainted: PF O 3.13.0-3-generic #18-Ubuntu [ 241.352474] echo 0 /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs disables this message. [ 241.352532] systemd-udevd D f4fd7a24 0 381270 0x0004 [ 241.352552] f4fd7a4c 0086 c12f0573 f4fd7a24 c18294f8 c1a7c780 0001 0001 [ 241.352582] c1a7c780 f5858000 f68a0d00 0003d1d6 f4fd7a1c f86e97df 1b762573 [ 241.352608] f86e97e1 f86e97e1 f86ee998 f4fd7a60 c12f29dc 0001 ff02 [ 241.352635] Call Trace: [ 241.352663] [c12f0573] ? format_decode+0x323/0x390 [ 241.352708] [c12f29dc] ? vsnprintf+0x2cc/0x3d0 [ 241.352728] [c12f0001] ? put_dec_trunc8+0x61/0xa0 [ 241.352750] [c16415a3] schedule_preempt_disabled+0x23/0x60 [ 241.352766] [c1642eed] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0x10d/0x171 [ 241.352782] [c164241c] mutex_lock+0x1c/0x28 [ 241.352910] [f8d93aa2] intel_get_load_detect_pipe+0x152/0x3a0 [i915] [ 241.353059] [f8dc3142] ? gen4_read32+0x32/0xb0 [i915] [ 241.353075] [c12f2b6a] ? snprintf+0x1a/0x20 [ 241.353195] [f8d9516d] intel_modeset_setup_hw_state+0xa7d/0xae0 [i915] [ 241.353273] [f86cffd8] ? drm_mode_config_reset+0x98/0xb0 [drm] [ 241.353392] [f8d951fe] intel_modeset_gem_init+0x2e/0x40 [i915] [ 241.353490] [f8d5abfb] i915_driver_load+0xb3b/0xdc0 [i915] [ 241.353586] [f8d57e10] ? i915_switcheroo_set_state+0xa0/0xa0 [i915] [ 241.353706] [f86cbcab] drm_dev_register+0x8b/0x1a0 [drm] [ 241.353768] [f86cd78e] drm_get_pci_dev+0x7e/0x120 [drm] [ 241.353797] [c11d8e37] ? sysfs_do_create_link_sd.isra.2+0xa7/0x1c0 [ 241.353897] [f8d575ea] i915_pci_probe+0x3a/0x80 [i915] [ 241.353918] [c132870f] pci_device_probe+0x6f/0xc0 [ 241.353934] [c11d8f75] ? sysfs_create_link+0x25/0x40 [ 241.353956] [c13faf65] driver_probe_device+0x105/0x380 [ 241.353972] [c1328662] ? pci_match_device+0xb2/0xc0 [ 241.353992] [c13fb291] __driver_attach+0x71/0x80 [ 241.354008] [c13fb220] ? __device_attach+0x40/0x40 [ 241.354026] [c13f93c7] bus_for_each_dev+0x47/0x80 [ 241.354043] [c13fa9ce] driver_attach+0x1e/0x20 [ 241.354057] [c13fb220] ? __device_attach+0x40/0x40 [ 241.354072] [c13fa627] bus_add_driver+0x157/0x230 [ 241.354093] [c13fb859] driver_register+0x59/0xe0 [ 241.354111] [c10487a0] ? __set_pmd_pte+0xa0/0xa0 [ 241.354130] [c1327142] __pci_register_driver+0x32/0x40 [ 241.354191] [f86cd925] drm_pci_init+0xf5/0x100 [drm] [ 241.354223] [f8655000] ? 0xf8654fff [ 241.354316] [f865505e] i915_init+0x5e/0x60 [i915] [ 241.354333] [c1002122] do_one_initcall+0xd2/0x190 [ 241.354352] [c10e94f8] ? tracepoint_module_notify+0x118/0x180 [ 241.354372] [f8655000] ? 0xf8654fff [ 241.354389] [c1049daf] ? set_memory_nx+0x5f/0x70 [ 241.354411] [c16393ee] ? set_section_ro_nx+0x54/0x59 [ 241.354432] [c10c210a] load_module+0x111a/0x18e0 [ 241.354464] [c10c2a35] SyS_finit_module+0x75/0xc0 [ 241.354481] [c11374cb] ? vm_mmap_pgoff+0x7b/0xa0 [ 241.354513] [c164b90d] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x28 I'll test the drm-intel-nightly next -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1251065 Title: HP Mini 1000 fails to resume from suspend To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/1251065/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 934156] Re: zeitgeist-datahub is calling inotify_add_watch() on .kde RecentDocuments every 4 seconds and failing
** Also affects: zeitgeist (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/934156 Title: zeitgeist-datahub is calling inotify_add_watch() on .kde RecentDocuments every 4 seconds and failing To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-power-consumption/+bug/934156/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 915261] Re: avahi-daemon: polling with zero timeout
apparently no news. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915261 Title: avahi-daemon: polling with zero timeout To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-power-consumption/+bug/915261/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1234289] Re: accounts-daemon is progressively causing more wakeups over time
running strace on one of the treads shows the culprit:
poll([{fd=4, events=POLLIN}, {fd=8, events=POLLIN}], 2, 3998) = 0 (Timeout)
inotify_add_watch(8, /etc/gdm,
IN_MODIFY|IN_ATTRIB|IN_CLOSE_WRITE|IN_MOVED_FROM|IN_MOVED_TO|IN_CREATE|IN_DELETE|IN_DELETE_SELF|IN_MOVE_SELF|IN_UNMOUNT|IN_ONLYDIR)
= -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
poll([{fd=4, events=POLLIN}, {fd=8, events=POLLIN}], 2, 3996) = 0 (Timeout)
inotify_add_watch(8, /etc/gdm,
IN_MODIFY|IN_ATTRIB|IN_CLOSE_WRITE|IN_MOVED_FROM|IN_MOVED_TO|IN_CREATE|IN_DELETE|IN_DELETE_SELF|IN_MOVE_SELF|IN_UNMOUNT|IN_ONLYDIR)
= -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
poll([{fd=4, events=POLLIN}, {fd=8, events=POLLIN}], 2, 3996) = 0 (Timeout)
inotify_add_watch(8, /etc/gdm,
IN_MODIFY|IN_ATTRIB|IN_CLOSE_WRITE|IN_MOVED_FROM|IN_MOVED_TO|IN_CREATE|IN_DELETE|IN_DELETE_SELF|IN_MOVE_SELF|IN_UNMOUNT|IN_ONLYDIR)
= -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
for some reason it is polling every 4 seconds and adding a watch on a
non-existent /etc/gdm directory
** Package changed: accountsservice (Ubuntu) = ubuntu-power-consumption
** Also affects: accountsservice (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: accountsservice (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Low
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1234289
Title:
accounts-daemon is progressively causing more wakeups over time
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-power-consumption/+bug/1234289/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
