This is not a synaptic issue, as synaptic only shows the Debian-accepted
sections listed.
The placement of libreoffice-writer in Editors is fine. The only thing
to be done here is:
Word processing in synaptic is probably misleading. Text processing is a
better term I think,
which refers to
On 14 April 2013 13:25, Luther 1168...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote:
Public bug reported:
When using apt-get install:
What is the complete command line issued?
You might want to run 'apt-get -f install' to correct these:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
python3 : Depends:
On 15 April 2013 00:41, Luther 1168...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote:
My current problem seems
to be fixed, but I don't know the bug that caused it.
status invalid
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
On 15 April 2013 01:19, Ads2 1168...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote:
I agree that that probably should be fixed but it doesn't damage the
program. The recommendation is a recommendation not a requirement so it
can't be a bug surely?
That is what the wishlist severity is for.
status new
**
On 15 April 2013 03:26, Adam Dingle a...@yorba.org wrote:
There's been a broad push in the GNOME world for all
applications to use XDG directories, and I think Synaptic should be no
exception.
Note that synaptic is not a part of the GNOME project. It does make
sense to apply the basedir spec.
** Description changed:
Synaptic currently stores various files in ~/.synaptic. Instead it should use
the directories recommended by the XDG specification:
- https://live.gnome.org/GnomeGoals/XDGConfigFolders
+ http://standards.freedesktop.org/basedir-spec/
--
You received this bug
As discussed here
https://code.launchpad.net/~evfool/synaptic/ancientfixes/+merge/93134/comments/290677
this “bug” will not be fixed, as there is no simple way for the program
and user to agree when to discard this option and when to keep it.
Either it is remember for _any_ action (current
On 15 April 2013 09:54, Susan Cragin susancra...@earthlink.net wrote:
Public bug reported:
I want to find RedNotebook, so I enter the word notebook in the Quick
Filter.
There are many entries, but no RedNotebook and nothing with Notebook in the
title.
Quick filter uses xapian, which by
This is not a forum for general support. What you describe is not a bug
in the software.
http://www.ubuntu.com/support
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
** Converted to question:
https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+question/226636
--
You received this
On 6 April 2013 21:32, Colsta 1165...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote:
OK - I wasn't aware the package status was arch:all
My mistake, it is not. In any case, apt is not at fault here as the
dependency chain of this package is not fully converted to multi-arch.
That process will be completed in time.
On 05/04/2013 10:30 PM, Colsta 1165...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote:
Behaviour:
When I try to bring in libsdl1.2-dev:i386, apt wants to uninstall half my
system!
Expectation:
I would expect the library to be installed seamlessly along with the
other i386 libraries I had already obtained.
This
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 396381 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/396381
On 19 March 2013 08:28, Seth Arnold 1156...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote:
When I upgraded from 12.10 to Raring, I found multiple instances of
running kernel triggers. It seemed inefficient to me to see the grub
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 396381 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/396381
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #481542
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=481542
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 396381
Update-grub should probably be set up to be
On 13 March 2013 17:07, Dmitrijs Ledkovs launch...@surgut.co.uk wrote:
Public bug reported:
Obsoleted by guile-1.8 and 2.0.
Only two leaf rdeps remaining, which do not seem to have any upstream any
more / not ported to newer guile.
Why not make this request in Debian?
** Affects: guile-pg
On 12 March 2013 02:14, Matt Fischer 1153...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote:
Public bug reported:
Apt doesn't understand commas, for example:
mfisch@caprica:~$ sudo apt-get install gstreamer1.0-plugins-bad,
gstreamer1.0-plugins-ugly
...
E: Unable to locate package gstreamer1.0-plugins-bad,
E:
On 6 March 2013 20:17, David Kalnischkies 1148...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote:
Theoretically
apt-get remove .*:*
(quotes so your shell isn't trying to expand it) would remove every
package from your system.
apt-get install .*
on the other hand would install every available package (in the
best
It is clear from the man page that ‘--ignore-missing’ is intended only
for packages that exist but fail to download correctly or can not be
downloaded at the time. Requesting a package that does not exist is
well outside the scope of this option and is an unsafe operation to
simply ignore.
The
** Also affects: wine1.4 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: lintian (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Invalid
** Changed in: gettext (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Invalid
** Changed in: debhelper (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Invalid
--
You
On 28 February 2013 23:05, habanany 198...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote:
Nevertheless (Raring Ringtail) looking good
What does this mean? Do you not experience the issue on Raring, only
on older releases?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
This is almost certainly due to multi-arch issues in wine1.4. See bug
954029 and others.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1059069
Title:
Installing wine1.4 on amd-64 removes
** Description changed:
[Impact]
* Inability to use aptitude on multi-arch systems. Any action which
results in a packaging conflict, or otherwise broken package, invokes
the problem resolver which will proceed to remove *all* foreign-arch
packages.
The packages are removed
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1082291 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1082291
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1082291
package gettext 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext:i386
0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch
--
You received this bug notification
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1082291 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1082291
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1082291
package gettext 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext:i386
0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch
--
You received this bug notification
On 19 February 2013 03:54, Scott Ritchie scottritc...@ubuntu.com wrote:
I agree with the sentiment about apt, however I thought it was the
current case that if a recommended (same-arch) package isn't available
in the archive, it does get simply ignored.
Quite right, for ‘install’ and
Output from a failed install with ‘-oDebug::pkgProblemResolver=1’ is
appreciated. The Debian wine packaging is substantially different.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1123710
Title:
This is in fact a bug in apt as well. A fresh install of 64-bit raring will
try to pull in gnome-exe-thumbnailer:i386, which in turn will ask for
icoutils:i386, which will then conflict:
libunity-webapps0 : Depends: unity-webapps-service but it is not going to be
installed
Rather than
Apport information is not helpful for this report. Please answer the
questions already asked:
Are you talking about the Check box
and Ubuntu Icon Columns? What Screen Resolution are you running at? can you
take a screen shot?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
I'm beginning to think I need to make some automated
tests for an elaborate series of multi-arch edge cases.
Hi Scott
Seems that wine is bringing a lot of these m-a issues to your desk :-)
Hopefully this:
winetricks is actually arch: all now
will be sufficient to avoid immediately having
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #700683
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=700683
** Also affects: cabextract (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=700683
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #700684
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=700684
** Also affects: msttcorefonts (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=700684
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification
On 15 February 2013 12:30, James Sleeman 1016...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote:
This problem of uninstallable ia32-libs affects the current Amazon EC2
AMI's for 12.10 which Amazon presents to users in the Quick Launch
Interface in the EC2 management console.
** Also affects: aptitude (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/923876
Title:
FR: Limit and clean-up kernel images and headers
* debian/apt.conf.autoremove: don't include linux-image*,
linux-restricted-modules*, and linux-ubuntu-modules* packages in the
list to never be autoremoved.
Aptitude in Precise and later (and earlier) carries a patch that
potentially nullifies this change. Previously the patch was
See also bug #1033838 for justification that 05aptitude should be
completely removed.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/923876
Title:
FR: Limit and clean-up kernel images and headers
On 9 February 2013 22:04, ptoche annopo...@gmail.com wrote:
2. shouldn't one expect that purge-ing muon would remove these lists?
No. Muon is not responsible for those lists. As indicated by the
path, they are handled by the apt package.
3. after purging, cleaning, installing again, then
On 7 February 2013 04:45, msp3k p...@nimbios.org wrote:
When trying to --reinstall multiple packages with apt-get, it crashes
with a segmentation fault. The command line: apt-get --reinstall
install 2-or-more-packages...
Provide a stacktrace and the complete output from the command,
including
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 396381 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/396381
On 7 February 2013 11:06, David davidventur...@gmail.com wrote:
Public bug reported:
I ran a dist-upgrade and had to upgrade memtest, linux image.
When those packages got installed, apt generated a new
affects ubuntu/nagios-nrpe
status new
** Changed in: nagios-nrpe (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1115690
Title:
aptitude hangs Preparing to
On 5 February 2013 06:40, ebnf 1115...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote:
Public bug reported:
aptitude hangs when trying to update nagios-nrpe-server.
Last message before stuck aptitude is: Preparing to replace nagios-
nrpe-server 2.12-6ubuntu2
Provide at least the full message, which should
On 3 February 2013 22:26, Miguel Milan angelover...@gmail.com wrote:
I fix the problem reinstalling ppa pakeg system up and running ..fyi
status invalid
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
On 3 February 2013 01:31, Miguel Milan angelover...@gmail.com wrote:
E:Malformed line 3 in source list /etc/apt/sources.list (dist parse)
Attach this file. How have you recently edited your software sources?
status incomplete
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Incomplete
--
On 31 January 2013 21:49, stadler michel 1110...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote:
le problème est résolu.
faut-il le signaler? comment?merci
If you have fixed the problem and do not believe it was caused by a
software fault, then the report status can be set to invalid in the
web interface.
I do
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #151987
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=151987
** Also affects: apt (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=151987
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #642480
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=642480
** Also affects: apt (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=642480
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you
On 31 January 2013 04:22, stadler michel 1110...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote:
Public bug reported:
line 57 bad in the list of sources
/etc/apt/sources.list (analyse de distribution)
Please attach this file and tell which program you use to configure
software sources.
status incomplete
**
On 30 January 2013 23:02, Adam Stokes adam.sto...@canonical.com wrote:
My most recent work can be seen here:
http://people.canonical.com/~stokes/aptitude_0.6.8.2-1ubuntu1.raring.debdiff
A diff from the Debian version would be more convenient to review.
Anyway …
+aptitude (0.6.8.2-1ubuntu1)
On 30 January 2013 23:02, Adam Stokes adam.sto...@canonical.com wrote:
The google-mock package does provide the source under /usr/src/gmock,
They are not listed in the manifest of
google-mock_1.6.0-0ubuntu3_i386.deb? Instead there are some shared
libraries that, at upstreams request, the Debian
Integration test.
# pkg-sha256-bad has a bad SHA sum, but good MD5 sum. If apt is
# checking the best available hash (as it should), this will trigger
# a hash mismatch.
-- before patch:
Test for hash ok of apt-get source -d pkg-md5-ok … PASS
Test for hash ok of apt-get source -d pkg-sha256-ok
On 31 January 2013 12:00, shankao shan...@gmail.com wrote:
This problem has being fixed in the upstream bug #1078544. The fix has
also being ported back to precise and quantal -proposed.
That report and its fix only applies to the aptdaemon backend. The
problem is still present in the synaptic
On 31 January 2013 12:00, shankao shan...@gmail.com wrote:
This problem has being fixed in the upstream bug #1078544. The fix has
also being ported back to precise and quantal -proposed.
If you are interested in closing off bugs, that other report still
requires SRU verification for precise and
On 31 January 2013 13:20, shankao shan...@gmail.com wrote:
That report and its fix only applies to the aptdaemon backend. The
problem is still present in the synaptic backend, which this report
specifically refers to.
Should not be the bug report changed to synaptic in that case?
Synaptic
For a long time the server had no sha{1,256} information in the Source
records. But now that it has there seems to be some issues here too,
e.g. the quantal partner archive has:
…
I.e. for the .dsc file there is just a md5, not a sha available
A problem for the current patch which would miss
Perhaps the additional type–hash pairs
could be stored in an auxillery structure, to avoid an immediate break.
Though I'm not sure the issue of ignoring SHA sums is serious enough to
justify such a temporary hack.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 859665 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/859665
Disassociating Debian report; this issue is related to the fuzzy version
matching.
** Changed in: apt (Debian)
Importance: Unknown = Undecided
** Changed in: apt (Debian)
Status: Confirmed = New
On 30 January 2013 12:23, Adam Stokes adam.sto...@canonical.com wrote:
Everything has been fixed
Fine.
In the past few days the source of bug #1033838 has been discovered.
If the canonical location for that setting should be the user-setup
package (which IMO makes sense), then the file
Would you care to provide an updated patch or branch with the work in
progress?
attempting to run the aptitude build tests fail when
trying to find gtest.
Due to the Ubuntu package not shipping the files under /usr/src/gmock?
This difference from Debian is not obviously mentioned in the
00aptitude is generated by user-setup, when root-login is disabled. It
contains one setting:
Aptitude::Get-Root-Command sudo:/usr/bin/sudo;
which is also set in 05aptitude, shipped with /Ubuntu's/ aptitude
package. The user-setup code seems more universal, being conditional on
root-login
** Description changed:
+ aptitude::Get-Root-Command sudo:/usr/bin/sudo;
+
+ Set in 05aptitude (aptitude) and 00aptitude (user-setup). The user-
+ setup file is generated only if root-login is disabled in the installer
+ and co-incides with settings for other programs to use sudo.
+
+ Setting
Public bug reported:
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.6.8-1ubuntu1
When viewed online [Help User's Manual], the English README file
contains numerous character encoding errors.
The file doc/html-to-text converts a html document to text in a
particular encoding. The ubuntu patch
On 26 January 2013 17:15, Quin Eirik mor...@yahoo.com wrote:
And: why does it say Please use: bzr branch http://code.launchpad.net
/~ubuntu-desktop/gnome-terminal/ubuntu when it is a git repo at
git://git.gnome.org/gnome-terminal?
It refers to where /packaging/ is maintained, not the upstream
Contains changes to the tree outside of debian/patches:
src/apt_options.cc, src/generic/apt/pkg_changelog.cc.
Update to patches/04_changelog misses the entire point of that file.
Now it contains only changes to “branding”, which belong in
03_branding anyway.
No attempt to address any of the
debian/changelog also does not mention several of the remaining changes.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1103541
Title:
Please merge aptitude 0.6.8.2-1(main) from Debian unstable
** Changed in: ubuntu-translations
Status: Triaged = Fix Released
** Changed in: synaptic (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/983993
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1016294 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1016294
Steve Langasek (vorlon) wrote:
This bug report was from a user trying to use synaptic to install;
that's a question of synaptic supporting multiarch.
Synaptic (now) supports multiarch well enough to
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1016294 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1016294
Daniel Ejsing-Duun (zilvador) wrote:
Now when talking about my case I should mentioned that apt-get
at the same time states that I have held broken packages.
This message is sometimes incorrect.
When
From bug 971761, comment #37:
These issues are, without exception, the result of local misconfiguration
and/or local installation of mismatched library versions. It is not a bug
in ia32-libs that users have their systems in a state that doesn't allow the
package's dependencies to be satisfied
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1016294 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1016294
On 14 January 2013 12:20, Steve Langasek steve.langa...@canonical.com wrote:
To our knowledge, if [dpkg.cfg.d/multiarch] is missing this can only
be as a result of a manual action on your part to remove
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 954029 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954029
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 954029
gettext fails to install; package relationships should be with
gettext:any, gettext-base:any, or are not required/useful at all
--
You received this
** Changed in: ia32-libs (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1093819
Title:
ia32-libs-multiarch but it is not installable (i386 not configured)
To
@ Wubi maintainers
Please triage this issue. It seems the installed system did not have
i386 configured as foreign architecture which a regular 12.10 install
would have.
** Summary changed:
- ia32-libs-multiarch but it is not installable (i386 not configured)
+ Wubi installed 12.10 amd64
[I am not also assigning to debootstrap which has the same issue as this
is unsupported. See bug #971761, comment #37.]
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1093819
Title:
Wubi installed
On 11 January 2013 16:58, Michael Vogt michaelv...@imap.cc wrote:
** Patch added: Trivial extension of Daniels fix for #1086997
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1003633/+attachment/3479965/+files/fix.diff
Please include also a comment above that line indicating why “+”
On 12 January 2013 10:57, Adam Conrad adcon...@0c3.net wrote:
Hello Daniel, or anyone else affected,
Note I am not affected by this issue as I use neither Ubuntu or
aptdaemon.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Sebastian Heinlein (glatzor) wrote:
The user should be allowed to override any holds, so I
have chosen your second patch.
Yes. Ideally the /caller/ should be able to control this, as not all
requests will come so directly from the user. Please in a future
revision also expose FromUser in the
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1069019 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1069019
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1069019
[software-properties-gtk] can not delete, enable or modify any software
source with non-ASCII characters in the comment
--
You received this bug
This could be another instance of bug 1069019. Please see if there are
non-ASCII text in any sources.list with this command:
$ sudo file /etc/apt/sources.list.d/*
/etc/apt/sources.list.d/alice.list: ASCII text
/etc/apt/sources.list.d/barry.list: ASCII text
/etc/apt/sources.list.d/charlie.list:
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1069019 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1069019
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1069019
[software-properties-gtk] can not delete, enable or modify any software
source with non-ASCII characters in the comment
--
You received this bug
As the failing command is net-update, that output may be more useful:
$ sudo apt-key net-update
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1095705
Title:
cron.daily/apt fails every day on
** Description changed:
[Impact]
* Inability to use aptitude on multi-arch systems. Any action which
results in a packaging conflict, or otherwise broken package, invokes
the problem resolver which will proceed to remove *all* foreign-arch
packages.
The packages are removed
Ubuntu SRU Team
Based on the date of your subscription (2012-11-08) the fix /would/ be
one of the five oldest entries in the unapproved queue for Precise. It
does not appear in that queue as ubuntu-sponsors have declined to upload
without prior consideration by your team.
Please consider the
Is there a way how i can run this trigger in some kind of
debug mode for having logging messages?
The trigger executes only one command, you can invoke it manually without
--quiet to see if it behaves similar:
# gtk-update-icon-cache --force --quiet /usr/share/icons/hicolor
(and/or
The delay here might not be due to any bug at all. Reassigned to gtk+
packages for their maintainers to determine.
Florian, which version of libgtk2.0-bin and libgtk-3-bin are you using?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu)
Status: Opinion = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/136571
Title:
aptitude hastheannoying message that it does not have super cow powers
** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu)
Status: Opinion = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/641068
Title:
aptitude does not show changelog when suggesting package upgrades
To
Daniel Hartwig wrote:
Please paste the actual output from when the process hangs
That is, all output from “apt-get install foo” onwards. Use apt-get,
not aptitude to reproduce.
** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress = Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification
In addition to providing the previously requested information, you can flesh
out your initial claims:
Whenever trigger high-color-icon-theme is called while
installing some app with gui, this can take up to 6 minutes!
Give concrete examples of packages that approx. 6 minutes at this step.
Do
** Package changed: hicolor-icon-theme (Ubuntu) = sensors-applet
(Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/743956
Title:
Incorrect icon dimension of '22x22/sensors-applet-gpu.png'
To
I think, there's some timeout running
What makes you think that?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1025184
Title:
Trigger high-color-icon-theme takes minutes with every install
To
If I'm not wrong I think the command apt-cache policy package show
the source it was installed from.
That command shows the sources each version is /available/ from, not
where it was installed from.
If and only if the said package/version still exists in one of your
sources.
Some times, and
On 29 December 2012 08:11, Sworddragon 1094...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote:
Public bug reported:
I'm using Ubuntu 13.04 dev with apt 0.9.7.6ubuntu6 and whiptail
0.52.14-11ubuntu4.
Since you mention whiptail I presume that you have debconf configured
to use the default frontend, dialog.
If I'm
On 26 December 2012 23:39, DmitryKX 1093...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
ia32-libs : Depends: ia32-libs-multiarch but it is not installable
E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
Provide also the output of:
$ apt-cache policy
Also:
# apt-get install -oDebug::pkgProblemResolver=1 ia32-libs
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1093819
Title:
Can't install ia32-libs in chrooted environment
To manage notifications
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1016294 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1016294
Using Ubuntu 12.10 x86_64 on host system and in deboostrapped
environment. I chrooted to deboostrapped environment and run:
Never mind the previous responses.
ia32-libs-multiarch is available only for
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1016294
ia32-libs-multiarch but it is not installable
** Also affects: ia32-libs (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Description changed:
+ ia32-libs-multiarch is i386 only. Systems without i386 configured
+ receive this error trying to install ia32-libs:
+
+ ia32-libs : Depends: ia32-libs-multiarch but it is not installable
+
+ Of course, this is entirely a configuration issue: dpkg is not using
+ i386.
There appears to be at least two issues conflated here:
- dependency problems (and archive skew, upgrade issues); and
- i386 not configured.
I have just moved bug 1093819 from apt which covers the later case (and
presumably the above comments #15, #20, #27, that is, systems without
i386
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 831768 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/831768
See also: bug 954029
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 831768
aptitude cannot handle conflicts with multiarch enabled
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
On 22 December 2012 09:41, Daniel Hartwig mand...@gmail.com wrote:
Möchten Sie fortsetzen? [Y/n/?]
Those command line prompts can not be localized without significant
design effort as they take multiple commands. Localizing [yn] is
simple with nl_langinfo(3), but there is not yet a general
joseangelmadrid joseangelmad...@gmail.com wrote:
This bug could be true. When I try to answer to the closing dialog
¿Desea salir de Aptitude? (Sí/No), it only exits if I press Y not
S
Your issue is not the same as that reported here, please file a new
report and be sure to specify which
On 11 December 2012 08:05, Rudd-O rud...@rudd-o.com wrote:
Still not fixed in precise.
Please contact a bug supervisor to nominate this task for precise
then. You can find such people on #ubuntu-bugs.
The description already contains appropriate SRU fields, and the
upstream patch is
201 - 300 of 732 matches
Mail list logo
