I've checked, and same issue on Ubuntu 18.04.5 (i.e cores=4
enabledcores=1)
BUT, good news, at least there
lshw -version
reports a version: B.02.18
and, yes, it is a 'B'?!
Packager reports lshw as version 02.18-0.1ubuntu6.18.04.2
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
I've noticed the same thing on Ubuntu 20.04.
That is, 4 cores but reports only one enabled -- even when they are all
"working hard".
Also,
sudo lshw -version
just reports a "blank line", no version number.
The installer says that I have lshw version
02.18.85-0.3ubuntu2.20.04.1
HTH
--
You
After reading
https://support.google.com/chrome/thread/67845533?hl=en
I tried, on a whim,
chromium-browser --disable-gpu
and all works fine.
I do not know what that means, but thought I'd post it here for 'data'.
Perhaps it will help someone understand where to look for debugging, or, even,
w
C#8
I tried removing ~/.config/chromium but it did not change the empty
window problem.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1893484
Title:
Google Chrome 85.0.4183.83 crahses with SIGSEGV
> I would appreciate if you could comment on this bug when
> you get the update to let me know whether chromium-browser still works.
For me, chromium-browser stopped working when updated to version 85.0.4183.83
(on Ubuntu 18.04.5).
It "comes up" but no graphics (or text) are displayed. Just a l
If it helps, the output of the 'find' commands, mentioned prior to
comment #25 are as you might guess:
$ sudo find /usr -type d -name duplicity -ls
1471833 4 drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 Jun 9 2017
/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/duplicity
54981 4 drwxr-xr-x 3 ro
I had/have similar issue as "resolved" in comment #25:
Initially, after building and installing version 0.8.09, I would try
duplicity --version
and get
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/local/bin/duplicity", line 55, in
from duplicity.dup_main import main
ImportError: No modul
Public bug reported:
I'm running an 'mu' find command and it looks like it's overrunning the
end of an array and triggering some more aggressive memory checking
enabled with the newer version of gcc in xenial.
Here's the actual command I'm running and the crash output:
$ mu find "hello" --thread
I got the same after upgrading my HWE version with the following:
$ sudo apt-get install linux-generic-lts-trusty linux-image-generic-lts-
trusty
[ ... ]
update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-3.13.0-30-generic
W: Possible missing firmware /lib/firmware/rtl_nic/rtl8168g-3.fw for module
r8
Sorry, this may have been user error ... it asked me if I wanted to
"monitor" eth0, and I said "yes" (knowing I had only one "network"
attached) ... but, now I see its name is "eth1" ... so, perhaps I just
assumed it detected eth0 and it was assuming I'd change it to correct
name.
--
You received
Public bug reported:
I was just installing ntop "with suggests".
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: ntop 3:4.1.0+dfsg1-1
Uname: Linux 3.9.6-davidw-64 x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu17.3
Architecture: amd64
Date: Sat Jun 15 17:00:35 2013
DuplicateSignature: package:ntop:
BTW, I was able to work around this. I booted by 64 bit version (which
is in a separate partition) then mounted the 32 bit partition as "plain
data" mount (not to run anything). It had an empty boot folder
(presumably since I have my own boot partition, where "the real" files
reside) and a few symb
FYI, I rebooted (glad I could!), tried again, same error.
But, seeing the message below made me think to say I do have a separate
boot partition, if that matters.
- - -
Running depmod.
update-initramfs: deferring update (hook will be called later)
Failed to symbolic-link boot/initrd.img-3.2.0-24
Public bug reported:
I just booted up my Ubuntu 12.04 32 bit version, opened a console, ran
sudu apt-get update
sudo apt-get upgrade
was given about a dozen or so packages to upgrade, said "yes" and at the
end, failed.
I'll paste whole console log here:
$ sudo apt-get upgrade
Reading package l
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1004151
Title:
package linux-image-3.2.0-24-generic-pae 3.2.0-24.39 failed to
install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script
returned
** Visibility changed to: Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/955633
Title:
gnome-settings-daemon crashed with signal 5
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.l
I just wanted to say a personal thanks for this fix (and, the reporting,
and investigating, and the releasing, and the building ...).
I have confirmed on Ubuntu 12.04 Beta 1 that the Eclipse splash screen
displays without the resize grip, and it looks much better it is
great to see attention
In comment 5, Gabe asks about workarounds, in my just duplicated bug
899333 a workaround for my simple use-case was to directly use
Exec=gnome-terminal -x testmenu.sh
instead of the desired
Terminal=true
Exec=testmenu.sh
I'm sure that wouldn't work for everyone (have only skim read the other
us
I just wanted to say I found the comments in this (old) bug so very
helpful. I am one on the "opposite" camp, though ... I do want Firefox
to open and display the links I click on in other apps. And, I know it
did used to work that way ... not sure when it changed. Fortunately, I
use compiz and (af
Public bug reported:
I've tried to make a "launcher" for Unity, whose purpose is to have
several options to execute some particular .sh file. Some those .sh
files need a "terminal" and some do not. But, I have found that for a
"Shortcut group" Terminal=true seems to have no effect.
Here's a simpl
Comment #21 is really good news. I hope these means this "fix" will
trickle own to future releases (or maintenance?) of Ubuntu.
I tried installing just those two packages on my Natty based system, and
it indeed "fixed" the problems I was seeing. To be exact, I only
routinely run one 32 bit app on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brian,
Thanks for the follow up. I think you can close this bug as not
reproducible. It was a one time thing for me and I've just run
'sudo service apport start force_start=1' and updated the system
without any problems. I'd rather not re-in
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/703995
Title:
package apparmor 2.5.1-0ubuntu0.10.04.2 failed to install/upgrade:
subprocess installed post-installation script killed by signal
(Se
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: apparmor
Just after initial install (10.04 LTS), when I went to fully update the
system, I got that error.
davewill@robert1:~$ lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS
Release:10.04
It's an old Dell desktop that has had odd harware iss
George asked me to look at this spoolfile. Beyond the custom page size,
here is a little more information:
1. This print job was prepared with a PPD file for a Panasonic printer
and so contains PS code specific to that device - it will cause an error
on other devices (such as a Ricoh or maybe even
25 matches
Mail list logo
