[Bug 941874] Re: (fakeraid) root device not activated during boot

2013-07-18 Thread Ebbex
I've just installed a HP Microserver (N40L) with the latest installer from precise-updates/main/installer-amd64/20101020ubuntu136.9/images /quantal-netboot. The installer fails to activate the raid, so I had to drop into a shell, write dmraid -ay, to continue the installation. After the install,

[Bug 941874] Re: (fakeraid) root device not activated during boot

2013-07-18 Thread Ebbex
(initramfs) dmraid -ay RAID set pdc_ebdeeaiceb-0 was activated RAID set pdc_ebdeeaiceb-1 was activated RAID set pdc_ebdeeaiceb was activated RAID set pdc_ebdeeaiceb1 was activated RAID set pdc_ebdeeaiceb2 was activated RAID set pdc_ebdeeaiceb3 was activated -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 941874] Re: (fakeraid) root device not activated during boot

2013-07-18 Thread Ebbex
(initramfs) blkid (initramfs) blkid -p /dev/sd[a-d] /dev/sda: TYPE=promise_fasttrack_raid_member USAGE=raid /dev/sdb: TYPE=promise_fasttrack_raid_member USAGE=raid /dev/sdc: TYPE=promise_fasttrack_raid_member USAGE=raid /dev/sdd: TYPE=promise_fasttrack_raid_member USAGE=raid Without any

[Bug 941874] Re: (fakeraid) root device not activated during boot

2013-07-19 Thread Ebbex
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-lts-quantal/+bug/1202955 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to multipath-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/941874 Title: (fakeraid) root device not activated

[Bug 520386] Re: libvirt-bin hypervisor does not support virConnectNumOfInterfaces / unable to create domain with virt-manager using network bridge

2010-09-07 Thread Ebbex
Will a newer version end up in backports, or is the quick fix getting it from maverick? -- libvirt-bin hypervisor does not support virConnectNumOfInterfaces / unable to create domain with virt-manager using network bridge https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/520386 You received this bug notification

[Bug 60442] Dual / Two Batteries, shutdown on empty expansion battery.

2006-09-14 Thread Ebbex
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-power-manager Have two fully charged batteries on your laptop. Let the expansion battery on your laptop run out of power. Watch your laptop power down with still 50% charge left. Ubuntu Edgy: IBM Thinkpad X40. ** Affects: gnome-power-manager

[Bug 60826] pcspkr isn't default in /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist

2006-09-16 Thread Ebbex
Public bug reported: I'm sitting, listening to music, wearing earbuds. Suddenly a system beep comes along. BEEP! It apparently does not care about my volume settings. I should sue someone for temporary and possibly permanent hearing loss. On a slightly more serious note though; Come on... It's

[Bug 60442] Re: Dual / Two Batteries, shutdown on empty expansion battery. (GPM does not recognises second battery on hotplug)

2006-10-16 Thread Ebbex
Yep. This wasn't an issue in dapper with the older g-p-m. It's all g-p-m's fault. g-p-m sees both my batteries, and calculates the total time and total charge, but shuts down on one empty battery. -- Dual / Two Batteries, shutdown on empty expansion battery. (GPM does not recognises second

[Bug 196283] Re: netboot hardy installer marvell sata disks not detected.

2008-03-10 Thread Ebbex
Using the files {linux,initrd.gz}, dated 2008.03.04, from ftp://ftp.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/hardy/main/installer-i386/current/images/netboot/ubuntu-installer/i386/ None of my disks show up. I don't have a cd-rom, so i'm not able to test normal/alternate cd- releases. It needs to be done via pxe.

[Bug 196283] Re: netboot hardy installer marvell sata disks not detected.

2008-03-10 Thread Ebbex
** Attachment added: seriously broken installer (lsmod) http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12544007/lsmod.txt -- netboot hardy installer marvell sata disks not detected. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/196283 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 196283] Re: netboot hardy installer marvell sata disks not detected.

2008-03-10 Thread Ebbex
** Attachment added: seriously broken installer (lspci) http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12544015/lspci.txt -- netboot hardy installer marvell sata disks not detected. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/196283 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 196283] Re: netboot hardy installer marvell sata disks not detected.

2008-03-10 Thread Ebbex
uname -a Linux mj 2.6.24-11-generic #1 SMP Fri Feb 29 22:08:31 UTC 2008 i686 unknown -- netboot hardy installer marvell sata disks not detected. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/196283 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 196283] Re: netboot hardy installer marvell sata disks not detected.

2008-03-10 Thread Ebbex
** Description changed: 1) Ubuntu 8.04 hardy 2) netboot.tar.gz ? 3) 2008.02.26 - 4) Detect all my disks, allow me to partition them, and install. 5) - 1 in every 20 boots, if i randomly tweak around with bios settings, it will detect the disks. - The other 19 times, they are

[Bug 196283] Re: netboot hardy installer marvell sata disks not detected.

2008-03-11 Thread Ebbex
Related bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/139234 same type of marvell sata 6145 controller. -- netboot hardy installer marvell sata disks not detected. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/196283 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 139234] Re: Marvell SATA controller not recognized

2008-03-11 Thread Ebbex
Is this during the ubuntu-installer, or on an installed system? And which version of Linux kernel is running? (I have the 6145 controller aswell, doesn't work during the install, but works on an installed system with the 2.6.24 kernel.) See

[Bug 201049] Re: hard disk not found

2008-03-11 Thread Ebbex
The 20080306 i386 build is broken. Having same issues here. Try a newer version, 20080311 is out. -- hard disk not found https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201049 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 196283] Re: netboot hardy installer marvell sata disks not detected.

2008-02-27 Thread Ebbex
** Attachment added: installer dmesg (not working) http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12264294/installer-dmesg.txt -- netboot hardy installer marvell sata disks not detected. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/196283 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 196283] Re: netboot hardy installer marvell sata disks not detected.

2008-02-27 Thread Ebbex
** Attachment added: installer lspci (not working) http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12264297/installer-lspci.txt -- netboot hardy installer marvell sata disks not detected. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/196283 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 196283] Re: netboot hardy installer marvell sata disks not detected.

2008-02-27 Thread Ebbex
** Attachment added: installer lsmod (not working) http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12264295/installer-lsmod.txt -- netboot hardy installer marvell sata disks not detected. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/196283 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 196283] Re: netboot hardy installer marvell sata disks not detected.

2008-02-27 Thread Ebbex
** Attachment added: installed system lspci (working) http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12264282/mj-lspci.txt -- netboot hardy installer marvell sata disks not detected. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/196283 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 196283] Re: netboot hardy installer marvell sata disks not detected.

2008-02-27 Thread Ebbex
** Attachment added: installed system lsmod (working) http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12264277/mj-lsmod.txt -- netboot hardy installer marvell sata disks not detected. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/196283 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 196283] [NEW] netboot hardy installer marvell sata disks not detected.

2008-02-27 Thread Ebbex
Public bug reported: 1) Ubuntu 8.04 hardy 2) netboot.tar.gz ? 3) 2008.02.26 4) Detect all my disks, allow me to partition them, and install. 5) 1 in every 20 boots, if i randomly tweak around with bios settings, it will detect the disks. The other 19 times, they are not detected. So I've

[Bug 196283] Re: netboot hardy installer marvell sata disks not detected.

2008-02-27 Thread Ebbex
** Attachment added: installed system dmesg (working) http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12264275/mj-dmesg.txt -- netboot hardy installer marvell sata disks not detected. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/196283 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 131577] Re: [gutsy] No sound devices loaded for ICH7 Intel High Definition Audio Controller (which working fine in feisty)

2007-09-25 Thread Ebbex
Here's my output, using libata-dev kernel compiled with config-2.6.22-12-generic options. (I too have no sound, but snd-hda-intel is not in modules.) Linux mj 2.6.23-rc8 #1 SMP Wed Sep 26 02:21:06 CEST 2007 i686 GNU/Linux 00:1b.0 Audio device [0403]: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) High

[Bug 131577] Re: [gutsy] No sound devices loaded for ICH7 Intel High Definition Audio Controller (which working fine in feisty)

2007-09-28 Thread Ebbex
taken directly from config-2.6.22-generic # CONFIG_SND_HDA_INTEL is not set Which explains why the module was not present in my custom kernel either. Once I compiled it, I got sound. -- [gutsy] No sound devices loaded for ICH7 Intel High Definition Audio Controller (which working fine in

[Bug 97655] Re: dmraid45 target please

2007-09-18 Thread Ebbex
** Also affects: linux-source-2.6.22 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- dmraid45 target please https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/97655 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 71172] openoffice-writer dependency in base-install

2006-11-09 Thread Ebbex
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ubuntu-base sarcasmSomeone decided that it would be funny to have a package in base to depend on openoffice-writer./sarcasm So after a netboot installation. I've got your basic commandline linux, with no xserver, no windowmanager, yet somehow

[Bug 924513] [NEW] network with bonding does not start on ubuntu with separate /var partition

2012-01-31 Thread Ebbex
Public bug reported: I believe there are benefits of having a separate /var partition, unfortunately having bonding-configured network start up with the OS is not one of them. Or atleast not in a timely fashion. I've done this experiment on two identical hp bl460c g1 blades, only difference was

[Bug 924513] Re: network with bonding does not start on ubuntu with separate /var partition

2012-01-31 Thread Ebbex
This was tested on Oneiric amd64 3.0.0-15-generic #26-Ubuntu SMP and oneiric-proposed 3.0.0-15-generic #28-Ubuntu SMP. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/924513 Title: network with

[Bug 924513] Re: network with bonding does not start on ubuntu with separate /var partition

2012-02-01 Thread Ebbex
Works on Natty amd64 2.6.38-13-generic #54-Ubuntu SMP with ifenslave-2.6 1.1.0-15ubuntu2.11.04.1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/924513 Title: network with bonding does not start on

[Bug 924513] Re: network with bonding does not start on ubuntu with separate /var partition

2012-02-01 Thread Ebbex
Fun fact: On a fresh install of natty with working bonding configuration, do-release-upgrade renders the system with a separate /var partition, without working networking once it boots to oneiric. Oneiric amd64, 3.0.0-15-generic #26-Ubuntu SMP ifenslave-2.6 1.1.0-19ubuntu1. -- You received this

[Bug 924513] Re: network with bonding does not start on ubuntu with separate /var partition

2012-02-02 Thread Ebbex
** Also affects: upstart Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/924513 Title: network with bonding does not start on ubuntu with separate /var

[Bug 924513] Re: network with bonding does not start on ubuntu with separate /var partition

2012-02-03 Thread Ebbex
I just completed my second round of testing, all with a separate /var partition; Tested: 1. netboot install of precise. Could not install, problems installing linux-generic package at end of installation. (also tried linux-server, and linux-image-generic) Installation is done via ttyS0, so did

[Bug 924513] Re: network with bonding does not start on ubuntu with separate /var partition

2012-02-03 Thread Ebbex
2. ifenslave-2.6 1.1.0-19ubuntu1 3. ifenslave-2.6 1.1.0-19ubuntu1.1 4. ifenslave-2.6 1.1.0-19ubuntu5 (works!) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/924513 Title: network with bonding does

[Bug 663987] [NEW] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#x stuck for 61s!

2010-10-20 Thread Ebbex
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: linux-image-2.6.32-25-generic Ok, so this is probably my own fault. But it says BUG, so I'll report it anyway. [12276.094371] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#7 stuck for 61s! [udevd:17459] [12276.094376] Modules linked in: scsi_dh_emc fbcon tileblit font bitblit

[Bug 713805] [NEW] type 'exceptions.TypeError': 'dbus.Struct' object does not support item assignment

2011-02-05 Thread Ebbex
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: aptdaemon Downloaded opera 11.01 package. db-click to install. type administrative password for installation. crash. ProblemType: Crash DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: aptdaemon 0.40+bzr541-0ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-1.28-generic

[Bug 713805] Re: type 'exceptions.TypeError': 'dbus.Struct' object does not support item assignment

2011-02-05 Thread Ebbex
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/713805 Title: type 'exceptions.TypeError': 'dbus.Struct' object does not support item assignment -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 520700] [NEW] (eog:990): GdkPixbuf-CRITICAL **: try_colormap: assertion `ctx-cmap_size 0' failed

2010-02-11 Thread Ebbex
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: eog This is probably due to a library eog uses. This will also prevents certain configurations* of nautilus (*those with thumbnailing) from accessing the folder where such an image is contained. Nautilus will also crash/assert/segfault when attempting to

[Bug 520700] Re: (eog:990): GdkPixbuf-CRITICAL **: try_colormap: assertion `ctx-cmap_size 0' failed

2010-02-11 Thread Ebbex
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39076083/Dependencies.txt -- (eog:990): GdkPixbuf-CRITICAL **: try_colormap: assertion `ctx-cmap_size 0' failed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/520700 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 520700] Re: (eog:990): GdkPixbuf-CRITICAL **: try_colormap: assertion `ctx-cmap_size 0' failed

2010-02-11 Thread Ebbex
** Attachment added: Image that fails assertion. http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39076112/COLONY.PIK.tga -- (eog:990): GdkPixbuf-CRITICAL **: try_colormap: assertion `ctx-cmap_size 0' failed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/520700 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 520700] Re: (eog:990): GdkPixbuf-CRITICAL **: try_colormap: assertion `ctx-cmap_size 0' failed

2010-02-11 Thread Ebbex
You'll have to excuse all the crap irrelevant text that came with the apport-bug report, I didn't immediately spot a way to file a bug without using ubuntu-bug. And it apparently wouldn't take the core file as a parameter. The assertion in the summary gives a a great hint as to what's wrong. Just

[Bug 520717] [NEW] Nautilus crashes/asserts/segfaults on folder containing a bad image.

2010-02-11 Thread Ebbex
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nautilus I first noticed nautilus dissapearing when opening a folder containing that image. Then I noticed eog crashing when trying to open/view the image. ** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: eog

[Bug 520717] Re: Nautilus crashes/asserts/segfaults on folder containing a bad image.

2010-02-11 Thread Ebbex
** Attachment added: Corrupting image. http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39076603/COLONY.PIK.tga -- Nautilus crashes/asserts/segfaults on folder containing a bad image. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/520717 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 520386] Re: libvirt-bin hypervisor does not support virConnectNumOfInterfaces / unable to create domain with virt-manager using network bridge

2010-09-07 Thread Ebbex
Will a newer version end up in backports, or is the quick fix getting it from maverick? -- libvirt-bin hypervisor does not support virConnectNumOfInterfaces / unable to create domain with virt-manager using network bridge https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/520386 You received this bug notification

[Bug 566673] Re: Installation detects neither wired Attansic interface nor wireless Broadcom interface

2010-08-05 Thread Ebbex
Can't netboot with Atheros AR8132 / L1c Gigabit Ethernet Adapter (rev c0) either on Asus 1001 HA. -- Installation detects neither wired Attansic interface nor wireless Broadcom interface https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/566673 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 1202955] Re: (fakeraid) root device not activated during boot

2013-07-21 Thread Ebbex
And yes, unfortunately I'm dualbooting Windows Server for other experiments. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1202955 Title: (fakeraid) root device not activated during boot To manage

[Bug 1202955] Re: (fakeraid) root device not activated during boot

2013-07-21 Thread Ebbex
(initramfs) dmraid -i -r -cr /dev/sda pdc_ebdeeaiceb-0 (initramfs) dmraid -s -cr /dev/sda ERROR: pdc: wrong # of devices in RAID set pdc_ebdeeaiceb-1 [1/2] on /dev/sdd ERROR: pdc: wrong # of devices in RAID set pdc_ebdeeaiceb-1 [1/2] on /dev/sdc ERROR: pdc: wrong # of devices in RAID set

[Bug 941874] Re: (fakeraid) root device not activated during boot

2013-07-18 Thread Ebbex
I've just installed a HP Microserver (N40L) with the latest installer from precise-updates/main/installer-amd64/20101020ubuntu136.9/images /quantal-netboot. The installer fails to activate the raid, so I had to drop into a shell, write dmraid -ay, to continue the installation. After the install,

[Bug 941874] Re: (fakeraid) root device not activated during boot

2013-07-18 Thread Ebbex
(initramfs) dmraid -ay RAID set pdc_ebdeeaiceb-0 was activated RAID set pdc_ebdeeaiceb-1 was activated RAID set pdc_ebdeeaiceb was activated RAID set pdc_ebdeeaiceb1 was activated RAID set pdc_ebdeeaiceb2 was activated RAID set pdc_ebdeeaiceb3 was activated -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 941874] Re: (fakeraid) root device not activated during boot

2013-07-18 Thread Ebbex
(initramfs) blkid (initramfs) blkid -p /dev/sd[a-d] /dev/sda: TYPE=promise_fasttrack_raid_member USAGE=raid /dev/sdb: TYPE=promise_fasttrack_raid_member USAGE=raid /dev/sdc: TYPE=promise_fasttrack_raid_member USAGE=raid /dev/sdd: TYPE=promise_fasttrack_raid_member USAGE=raid Without any

[Bug 1202955] [NEW] (fakeraid) root device not activated during boot

2013-07-19 Thread Ebbex
Public bug reported: I've just installed a HP Microserver (N40L) with the latest installer from precise-updates/main/installer-amd64/20101020ubuntu136.9/images /quantal-netboot. The installer fails to activate the raid, so I had to drop into a shell, write dmraid -ay, to continue the

[Bug 941874] Re: (fakeraid) root device not activated during boot

2013-07-19 Thread Ebbex
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-lts-quantal/+bug/1202955 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/941874 Title: (fakeraid) root device not activated during boot To manage

[Bug 1202955] Re: (fakeraid) root device not activated during boot

2013-07-19 Thread Ebbex
(initramfs) dmraid-activate sda ERROR: pdc: wrong # of devices in RAID set pdc_ebdeeaiceb-1 [1/2] on /dev/sdd ERROR: pdc: wrong # of devices in RAID set pdc_ebdeeaiceb-1 [1/2] on /dev/sdc ERROR: pdc: wrong # of devices in RAID set pdc_ebdeeaiceb-0 [1/2] on /dev/sdb ERROR: pdc: wrong # of devices

[Bug 1202955] Re: (fakeraid) root device not activated during boot

2013-07-19 Thread Ebbex
(initramfs) dmraid -s -si *** Superset name: pdc_ebdeeaiceb size: 1953124864 stride: 128 type: raid10 status: ok subsets: 2 devs: 4 spares: 0 -- Subset name: pdc_ebdeeaiceb-0 size: 1953124864 stride: 128 type: stripe status: ok subsets: 0 devs: 2 spares: 0 -- Subset name: pdc_ebdeeaiceb-1 size:

[Bug 1202955] Re: (fakeraid) root device not activated during boot

2013-07-19 Thread Ebbex
I think I've traced it down to a problem with the logic in dmraid- activate Raid_Name=$(dmraid -i -r -cr /dev/$Node_Name | grep -vi No RAID disks | grep -vi formats discovered) activate_array $Raid_Name Here it tries to activate a subset of a raid10. (pdc_ebdeeaiceb-0, pdc_ebdeeaiceb-1) when it

[Bug 1202955] Re: (fakeraid) root device not activated during boot

2013-07-19 Thread Ebbex
** Also affects: dmraid Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1202955 Title: (fakeraid) root device not activated during boot To manage

[Bug 1714988] [NEW] Stuck at 100% CPU in mainloop

2017-09-04 Thread Ebbex
Public bug reported: There's an issue where pen gets stuck in a loop and does nothing useful at all, it's been fixed in 0.32.0-2. Could you please update the package for xenial. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=819981 ** Affects: pen (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided