[Bug 1961425] [NEW] 22.04: FTBFS due to test failure

[Frédéric Bonnard]

Public bug reported:

Hi,
capnproto 0.8.0-2ubuntu1 fails on ppc64el : 
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/capnproto/0.8.0-2ubuntu1/+build/23090234/+files/buildlog_ubuntu-jammy-ppc64el.capnproto_0.8.0-2ubuntu1_BUILDING.txt.gz

Lowering optimization (O3->O2) level makes the failing test pass, for
instance adding 

export DEB_CXXFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND=-O1
export DEB_CXXFLAGS_MAINT_STRIP=-O3

in debian/rules.

For the time being that can be the way to go as 0.9.1-2 from Debian Experimental
builds fine on Jammy by default with O3.

F.

** Affects: capnproto (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1961425

Title:
  22.04: FTBFS due to test failure

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/capnproto/+bug/1961425/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1943446] Re: libpmemobj-cpp upgrade to 1.13.0-2 causes issues (on ppc64el only)

[Frédéric Bonnard]

Ok so since gcc-11, it won't pass tests with -O3, neither O2.
Got it work with O1.
```
export DEB_CXXFLAGS_MAINT_STRIP = -O3
export DEB_CXXFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND = -O1
```

As it worked fine as is with gcc-10 on Impish, I guess it's definitely
something for the toolchain team.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1943446

Title:
  libpmemobj-cpp upgrade to 1.13.0-2 causes issues (on ppc64el only)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-power-systems/+bug/1943446/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1925335] Re: subiquity installer : ibmveth disabled by default

[Frédéric Bonnard]

That would be nice!
What is the rational behind the choice of not enabling wifi for instance ?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1925335

Title:
  subiquity installer : ibmveth disabled by default

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/subiquity/+bug/1925335/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1925335] [NEW] subiquity installer : ibmveth disabled by default

[Frédéric Bonnard]

Public bug reported:

Hi,

on PowerVM, when installing a ppc64el LPAR (P8, P9, P10) with an ibmveth 
network interface,
this one is disabled by default even if it works and has a working DHCP server 
entry leading
subiquity installer to propose to "Continue without network" whereas it 
actually has network.

One just need to edit the configuration of the specific network interface,
select (in my case) "IPv4 Method" and switch it from "Disabled" to "Automatic 
(DHCP)".
Once that this is saved, the interface gets its IP address.

Not sure why it is disabled by default.

Would it be possible to have ibmveth interfaces enabled by default as other 
interfaces
seems to be ?

This happens on 20.04, 21.04.

Thanks,
F.

** Affects: subiquity (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Attachment added: "Disabled ibmveth in subiquity"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1925335/+attachment/5490645/+files/2021-04-21-115610_475x307_scrot.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1925335

Title:
  subiquity installer : ibmveth disabled by default

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/subiquity/+bug/1925335/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1822012] Re: powernv machine complains of missing skiboot files

[Frédéric Bonnard]

skiboot.lid is available on all architectures as part of qemu-system-data 
package which is "all", not ppc specific.
The latter is pulled by the binary package qemu-system-ppc, so no particular 
action is needed.

---
ubuntu@ubuntu:~$ uname -a
Linux ubuntu 5.4.0-72-generic #80-Ubuntu SMP Mon Apr 12 17:35:00 UTC 2021 
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
ubuntu@ubuntu:~$ lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description:Ubuntu 20.04.2 LTS
Release:20.04
Codename:   focal
ubuntu@ubuntu:~$ dpkg -S /usr/share/qemu/skiboot.lid
qemu-system-data: /usr/share/qemu/skiboot.lid
ubuntu@ubuntu:~$ dpkg -l|grep qemu
ii  ipxe-qemu1.0.0+git-20190109.133f4c4-0ubuntu3.2 
all  PXE boot firmware - ROM images for qemu
ii  ipxe-qemu-256k-compat-efi-roms   1.0.0+git-20150424.a25a16d-0ubuntu4   
all  PXE boot firmware - Compat EFI ROM images for qemu
ii  qemu-block-extra:amd64   1:4.2-3ubuntu6.15 
amd64extra block backend modules for qemu-system and qemu-utils
ii  qemu-slof20191209+dfsg-1   
all  Slimline Open Firmware -- QEMU PowerPC version
ii  qemu-system-common   1:4.2-3ubuntu6.15 
amd64QEMU full system emulation binaries (common files)
ii  qemu-system-data 1:4.2-3ubuntu6.15 
all  QEMU full system emulation (data files)
ii  qemu-system-gui:amd641:4.2-3ubuntu6.15 
amd64QEMU full system emulation binaries (user interface and audio 
support)
ii  qemu-system-ppc  1:4.2-3ubuntu6.15 
amd64QEMU full system emulation binaries (ppc)
ii  qemu-utils   1:4.2-3ubuntu6.15 
amd64QEMU utilities
---

Debian qemu-skiboot package was initially used to distribute skiboot.lid but it 
was soon after
replaced by qemu-system-data. At the moment qemu-skiboot is virtual in debian 
and it is provided
by qemu-system-data.

I tested powernv emulation on focal with that default setup and following this 
documentation:
https://qemu.readthedocs.io/en/latest/system/ppc/powernv.html
and I didn't encounter missing skiboot.lid issues.

Next time please provide logs, details about your ubuntu version and
packages versions.

F.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1822012

Title:
  powernv machine complains of missing skiboot files

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu/+bug/1822012/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1809098] Re: Please support other architectures

[Frédéric Bonnard]

Small update on this.
Not sure I should have close that bug in my latest upload in Debian, but
with 1.0.15, libdfp has support for i386 and amd64.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1809098

Title:
  Please support other architectures

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libdfp/+bug/1809098/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1840580] Re: 19.04 server powerpc64-el Installer fails at base-installer step

[Frédéric Bonnard]

Interesting, that very same iso works well on P8 and I tried on a P9 
(witherspoon) vm and didn't have any issue.
I don't have access to RaptorCS machines, though I don't get what could be 
related to the hardware given the type of error at that point
Could you attach some more logs : /var/log/syslog, dmesg output

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1840580

Title:
  19.04 server powerpc64-el Installer fails at base-installer step

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer/+bug/1840580/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1840580] Re: 19.04 server powerpc64-el Installer fails at base-installer step

[Frédéric Bonnard]

Hi Franck,
which iso URL did you use ?
On which machine ? baremetal, vm, LPAR ?

F.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1840580

Title:
  19.04 server powerpc64-el Installer fails at base-installer step

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer/+bug/1840580/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1837726] Re: Installation fails on eoan/PowerVM : missing /dev/nvram

[Frédéric Bonnard]

Thanks Thadeu, good to know the problem has been identified !
I'll be happy to test the fix.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1837726

Title:
  Installation fails on eoan/PowerVM : missing /dev/nvram

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1837726/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1837726] Re: Installation fails on eoan/PowerVM : missing /dev/nvram

[Frédéric Bonnard]

The fix is in 5.3.0-12.13 but trying current 
http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports/dists/eoan-proposed/main/installer-ppc64el/current/images/netboot/mini.iso
 (2019-09-21 81M, 3ed00b52f4335c589f4e1b070107c1af  mini.iso)
the kernel of the installer just panics without much details...

Preparing to boot Linux version 5.3.0-12-generic (buildd@bos02-ppc64el-011) 
(gcc version 9.2.1 20190909 (Ubuntu 9.2.1-8ubuntu1)) #13-Ubuntu SMP Tue Sep 17 
12:34:04 UTC 2019 (Ubuntu 5.3.0-12.13-generic 5.3.0)
Detected machine type: 0101command line: 
BOOT_IMAGE=/install/vmlinux tasks=standard pkgsel/language-pack-patterns= 
pkgsel/install-language-support=false --- quiet
Max number of cores passed to firmware: 2048 (NR_CPUS = 2048)
Calling ibm,client-architecture-support... donememory layout at init:
  memory_limit :  (16 MB aligned)
  alloc_bottom : 0708  alloc_top: 3000
  alloc_top_hi : 0001
  rmo_top  : 3000  ram_top  : 0001
instantiating rtas at 0x2fff... done
prom_hold_cpus: skipped
copying OF device tree...
Building dt strings...
Building dt structure...
Device tree strings 0x0709 -> 0x07090a8d
Device tree struct  0x070a -> 0x070b
Quiescing Open Firmware ...
Booting Linux via __start() @ 0x0200 ...
Linux ppc64le
#13-Ubuntu SMP T[0.914674] vio vio: uevent: failed to send synthetic uevent
Failed to write 'add' to '/sys/devices/vio/uevent': No such device
[0.917725] Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init! 
exitcode=0x0100
[0.917815] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: init Not tainted 5.3.0-12-generic #13-Ubuntu
[0.917885] Call Trace:
[0.917913] [c000fa4bfc00] [c0e72108] dump_stack+0xac/0xf4 
(unreliable)
[0.917996] [c000fa4bfc40] [c0126a2c] panic+0x16c/0x400
[0.918119] [c000fa4bfce0] [c012eb70] do_exit+0xca0/0xd40
[0.918206] [c000fa4bfdc0] [c012ece0] do_group_exit+0x60/0x120
[0.918308] [c000fa4bfe00] [c012edc4] sys_exit_group+0x24/0x40
[0.918377] [c000fa4bfe20] [c000b388] system_call+0x5c/0x70

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1837726

Title:
  Installation fails on eoan/PowerVM : missing /dev/nvram

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1837726/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1837726] Re: Installation fails on eoan/PowerVM : missing /dev/nvram

[Frédéric Bonnard]

Thanks Seth, I'll test this as soon as it's released.

F.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1837726

Title:
  Installation fails on eoan/PowerVM : missing /dev/nvram

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1837726/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1837726] Re: Installation fails on eoan/PowerVM : missing /dev/nvram

[Frédéric Bonnard]

apport-collect is not available from the installation iso shell

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1837726

Title:
  Installation fails on eoan/PowerVM : missing /dev/nvram

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1837726/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1837726] [NEW] Installation fails on eoan/PowerVM : missing /dev/nvram

[Frédéric Bonnard]

Public bug reported:

Hi,
since eoan and kernel 5.2, the installation fails when installing grub at the 
end.
Actually /dev/nvram does not exist.
nvram support was previously built in the kernel and is now built as a module,
and the module is not shipped within the iso or in udebs.
This is probably due to commit d7d73492dc5f2 in Ubuntu's linux git tree :

---
commit d7d73492dc5f2ccc5c76b042341370838af148e4
Author: Seth Forshee 
Date:   Wed Jun 5 10:47:33 2019 -0500

UBUNTU: [Config] update annotations following config review
...
-CONFIG_NVRAMpolicy<{'amd64': 'm', 'i386': 
'm'}>
+CONFIG_NVRAMpolicy<{'amd64': 'm', 'i386': 
'm', 'ppc64el': 'm'}>
...
---

F.

** Affects: linux (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1837726

Title:
  Installation fails on eoan/PowerVM : missing /dev/nvram

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1837726/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1809098] Re: Please support other architectures

[Frédéric Bonnard]

Hi,
what I know from the upstream is that libdfp is work in progress on x86 32b/64b.
So as the Debian package maintainer of libdfp, I don't intend to add other 
architectures than the one well supported.
In Debian, libdfp is also compiled on powerpc and ppc64.
So no other arch is planned to be added at the moment.

F.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1809098

Title:
  Please support other architectures

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libdfp/+bug/1809098/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1709889] Re: Ubuntu 18.04: Bug in cfq scheduler, I/Os do not get submitted to adapter for a very long time.

[Frédéric Bonnard]

Hi all,

bug #1785081 was not mirrored completely for some reason and I'm working
on fixing this : it's just about the bug happening on 18.04 specifically
kernel 4.15.0-26. Sorry for the lag.

Also, on ppc64el, RHEL 7.5 with a 4.14 kernel uses deadline, so I guess it's 
not a completely unsafe path.
I'm not pushing for anything, I just noticed that.

F.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1709889

Title:
  Ubuntu 18.04: Bug in cfq scheduler, I/Os do not get submitted to
  adapter for a very long time.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/1709889/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1785026] Re: [LTCTest][OPAL][OP920] OPAL PRD generated logs is not available in /var/log/opal-prd.log file

[Frédéric Bonnard]

Hi,
the log file mode is dealt with by logrotate. So restarting opal-prd won't make 
logrotate start and change anything (logrotate is called from crontab). The 
test case would rather be :

[Test Case]
- install fixed version of opal-prd package
- stop opal-prd daemon : sudo systemctl stop opal-prd
- force log rotation : sudo /usr/sbin/logrotate -f /etc/logrotate.conf
- check whether opal-prd logs /var/log/opal-prd.log file has 644 mode and non 
root owner.
- start opal-prd daemon : sudo systemctl start opal-prd : at that point 
opal-prd should just re-use the log with the proper mode.

That worked well for me with opal-prd 5.10~rc4-1ubuntu1.1 from bionic-
proposed.

F.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1785026

Title:
  [LTCTest][OPAL][OP920] OPAL PRD generated logs is not available in
  /var/log/opal-prd.log file

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-power-systems/+bug/1785026/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1790601] Re: Ubuntu18.10 - Update libocxl to version 1.1

[Frédéric Bonnard]

Thanks a lot Steve!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1790601

Title:
  Ubuntu18.10 - Update libocxl to version 1.1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-power-systems/+bug/1790601/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1790601] Re: Ubuntu18.10 - Update libocxl to version 1.1

[Frédéric Bonnard]

Nevertheless, I've upgraded libocxl to 1.1 in Debian Unstable since
linux 4.18 reached Unstable on September 6th.

F.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1790601

Title:
  Ubuntu18.10 - Update libocxl to version 1.1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-power-systems/+bug/1790601/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1784213] Re: lld missing on ppc64el

[Frédéric Bonnard]

Hi,
this should be done since version 6.0.1-6 : 
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/llvm-toolchain-6.0/1:6.0.1-6

F.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1784213

Title:
  lld missing on ppc64el

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/llvm-toolchain-6.0/+bug/1784213/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1709889] Re: Ubuntu 17.04: Bug in cfq scheduler, I/Os do not get submitted to adapter for a very long time.

[Frédéric Bonnard]

Dimitri, we've synced the other bug 1785081 that is probably the same
issue as this one.

F.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1709889

Title:
  Ubuntu 17.04: Bug in cfq scheduler, I/Os do not get submitted to
  adapter for a very long time.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/1709889/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1785026] Re: [LTCTest][OPAL][OP920] OPAL PRD generated logs is not available in /var/log/opal-prd.log file

[Frédéric Bonnard]

Fixed in skiboot-6.1-2 (Debian/Unstable).
You may use the same fix for 18.04 there : 
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/skiboot/commit/0e6ac150e51a0e7b3701acf78c311709b6336d58

F.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1785026

Title:
  [LTCTest][OPAL][OP920] OPAL PRD generated logs is not available in
  /var/log/opal-prd.log file

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-power-systems/+bug/1785026/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1779815] Re: [Ubuntu 18.04.01][BostonLC][mpt3sas] installer does not detect any LSI based SAS/md raid device

[Frédéric Bonnard]

Łukasz, Adam, thanks a lot for your help.

I don't know if Abdul tested Ubuntu's build but he did test successfully
with a build I did last week, when debian-installer was no yet rebuilt
on Ubuntu's side. Indeed that made sense on hwe which he tested ok.

Thanks for taking this pro-actively in 16.04.5 updates already.

F.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1779815

Title:
  [Ubuntu 18.04.01][BostonLC][mpt3sas] installer does not detect any LSI
  based SAS/md raid device

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-power-systems/+bug/1779815/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1771813] Re: [Ubuntu 18.10 FEAT] new libocxl library

[Frédéric Bonnard]

Hi,
the packaging I pushed in Debian was accepted by ftpmasters into unstable and 
synced to 18.10/universe.

F.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1771813

Title:
  [Ubuntu 18.10 FEAT] new libocxl library

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-power-systems/+bug/1771813/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1555904] Re: opal-prd not installed by default on ppc64el systems

[Frédéric Bonnard]

Hi Dimitri,
I did the test with the netboot vmlinux/initrd.gz from xenial-proposed and 
'apt-setup/proposed=true'
and it worked :

---
ubuntu@garri:~$ lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description:Ubuntu 16.04.4 LTS
Release:16.04
Codename:   xenial
ubuntu@garri:~$ apt-cache policy opal-prd
opal-prd:
  Installed: 5.4.3-1ubuntu0.16.04.1
  Candidate: 5.4.3-1ubuntu0.16.04.1
  Version table:
 *** 5.4.3-1ubuntu0.16.04.1 500
500 http://de.ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports xenial-updates/main ppc64el 
Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
 5.1.13-0ubuntu2 500
500 http://de.ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports xenial/universe ppc64el 
Packages
ubuntu@garri:~$ ps axf|grep opal-prd
  1837 ?Ss 0:00 /usr/sbin/opal-prd --pnor /dev/mtd0
  2067 hvc0 S+ 0:00  \_ grep --color=auto opal-prd
ubuntu@garri:~$ ls -ld /sys/firmware/devicetree/base/ibm,opal/diagnostics
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Feb 23 14:55 
/sys/firmware/devicetree/base/ibm,opal/diagnostics
---

Thanks,

F.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1555904

Title:
  opal-prd not installed by default on ppc64el systems

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-power-systems/+bug/1555904/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1689829] Re: guided partitioning creates an unbootable system on baremetal ppc64el

[Frédéric Bonnard]

Hi Dimitri,
hard to say, but this is taken into account :
https://github.com/open-power/petitboot/issues/15

F.

** Bug watch added: github.com/open-power/petitboot/issues #15
   https://github.com/open-power/petitboot/issues/15

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1689829

Title:
  guided partitioning creates an unbootable system on baremetal ppc64el

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/partman-auto/+bug/1689829/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1739498] Re: Ubuntu 17.10 crashes on vmalloc.c

[Frédéric Bonnard]

Hi Manoj, the patches that fixed this issue are the 3 listed above in my
comment :
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1739498/comments/6

F.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1739498

Title:
  Ubuntu 17.10 crashes on vmalloc.c

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-power-systems/+bug/1739498/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1715101] Re: Xenial : installer fails on POWER9

[Frédéric Bonnard]

Hi again,
I tested the latest netboot installer there 
http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports/dists/xenial-proposed/main/installer-ppc64el/current/images/hwe-netboot/ubuntu-installer/ppc64el/
 and it worked perfectly.
Thanks,
F.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1715101

Title:
  Xenial : installer fails on POWER9

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-power-systems/+bug/1715101/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1715101] Re: Xenial : installer fails on POWER9

[Frédéric Bonnard]

Hi Steve,
sorry for the delay, I've been afk. I'll check this today and let you know.
F.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1715101

Title:
  Xenial : installer fails on POWER9

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-power-systems/+bug/1715101/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1720304] Re: lsvpd: Do not run vpdupdate during installation

[Frédéric Bonnard]

Hi Vasant,
does that mean that we don't need to run vpdupdate on both, installation of a 
new package, and upgrade of the package ?
If so, what is vpdupdate binary needed for ? Do we still need to keep it 
packaged ?
Regards,

F.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1720304

Title:
  lsvpd: Do not run vpdupdate during installation

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-power-systems/+bug/1720304/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1715397] Re: systemd 234-2ubuntu9 ADT test failure with linux 4.13.0-9.10

[Frédéric Bonnard]

Thanks Vasant for double checking the fix.
The patch is in ppc64-diag 2.7.4-2 in Unstable.

F.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1715397

Title:
  systemd 234-2ubuntu9 ADT test failure with linux 4.13.0-9.10

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-power-systems/+bug/1715397/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1708494] Re: Update Package request for ppc64-diag

[Frédéric Bonnard]

Hi there,
I upgraded ppc64-diag to 2.7.4 in Debian Unstable.

F.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1708494

Title:
  Update Package request for ppc64-diag

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-power-systems/+bug/1708494/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1715101] [NEW] Xenial : installer fails on POWER9

[Frédéric Bonnard]

Public bug reported:

Hi,

could you please update the installer to use linux-hwe version >=
4.10.0-29 for POWER9 on Xenial.

At the moment the kernel/vmlinux in 
http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports/dists/xenial-proposed/main/installer-ppc64el/current/images/hwe-netboot/ubuntu-installer/ppc64el/
 is based on
linux 4.10.0-28 which doesn't include this ERAT related patch 
(https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1700521 and other P9 
fixes also) which cause the installer to fail on POWER9.

A move to hwe kernels with version greater than 4.10.0-29 should work.
Thanks a lot.

F.

** Affects: debian-installer (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1715101

Title:
  Xenial : installer fails on POWER9

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer/+bug/1715101/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1689829] Re: guided partitioning creates an unbootable system on baremetal ppc64el

[Frédéric Bonnard]

Could you review this rollback patch ?
Thanks

** Patch added: "partman-auto-fix-baremetal-ppc64el.patch"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/partman-auto/+bug/1689829/+attachment/4875551/+files/partman-auto-fix-baremetal-ppc64el.patch

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1689829

Title:
  guided partitioning creates an unbootable system on baremetal ppc64el

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/partman-auto/+bug/1689829/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1689829] [NEW] guided partitioning creates an unbootable system on baremetal ppc64el

[Frédéric Bonnard]

Public bug reported:

Hi,
on ppc64el, using autopartitioning with LVM, the system will install but after 
rebooting petitboot won't find the /boot content that is on LVM, because 
petitboot doesn't handle LVM yet.
So the system will not be bootable.
The changes that cause this are in the following changelog :
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/partman-auto/134ubuntu5

especially all the "+   $lvmignore{ }" for ppc64el.
Thanks for helping,

F.

** Affects: partman-auto (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1689829

Title:
  guided partitioning creates an unbootable system on baremetal ppc64el

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/partman-auto/+bug/1689829/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1549098] Re: Systemd init script does not pass --pnor

[Frédéric Bonnard]

This is fixed in Debian Unstable but due to the freeze in Ubuntu, it was
not synced to Zesty.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1549098

Title:
  Systemd init script does not pass --pnor

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/skiboot/+bug/1549098/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1555904] Re: opal-prd not installed by default on ppc64el systems

[Frédéric Bonnard]

Hi Steve,
indeed, not all the machines would be concerned, even if the daemon won't be 
loaded as it already does
this check itself, which is why I was not sure to do the check at install time 
or later by the daemon itself.
It's better though to target only the specific configuration.
The criteria is the existence of 
/sys/firmware/devicetree/base/ibm,opal/diagnostics directory.

That is an openpower baremetal machine (ibmpower do not have that diagnostic 
feature accessible from the host as the fsp does the diagnotic work)
So yes the fix is to be done somewhere else then but I'm not sure where. Some 
udeb, tasksel, the installer?
Let me know and I can do a patch that you could review.
Thanks,

F.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1555904

Title:
  opal-prd not installed by default on ppc64el systems

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/skiboot/+bug/1555904/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1671019] Re: PowerNV: Restart opal-prd daemon on any kind of failure

[Frédéric Bonnard]

I'm planning a new upstream release in Debian and I'm interested by this
patch, but it seems it's still discussed for improvement at the moment.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1671019

Title:
  PowerNV: Restart opal-prd daemon on any kind of failure

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/skiboot/+bug/1671019/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1549098] Re: Systemd init script does not pass --pnor

[Frédéric Bonnard]

The feature is actually fixed but it's hardcoded in the service file.
When I'll upload a new version, I'll use /etc/default/opal-prd as Jeremy 
suggested.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1549098

Title:
  Systemd init script does not pass --pnor

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/skiboot/+bug/1549098/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1555904] Re: opal-prd not installed by default on ppc64el systems

[Frédéric Bonnard]

Could you review the proposed patch based on the following :
some people recently ran into several issues on Minsky where they found that 
Opal PRD
  
was not running out on customer systems. "This is critical to our ability to
 
collect logs, determine what is causing failures, and for hostboot to take
appropriate action in regards to a failure."

** Patch added: "1555904.debdiff"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-meta/+bug/1555904/+attachment/4829829/+files/1555904.debdiff

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1555904

Title:
  opal-prd not installed by default on ppc64el systems

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-meta/+bug/1555904/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1555904] Re: opal-prd not installed by default on ppc64el systems

[Frédéric Bonnard]

I think this is related to ubuntu-meta that provides the different meta
packages for the different ubuntu flavors

** Package changed: debian-installer (Ubuntu) => ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1555904

Title:
  opal-prd not installed by default on ppc64el systems

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-meta/+bug/1555904/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1656281] Re: UbuntuKVM: Packaging: Update Wok, Gingerbase, Ginger, and Kimchi to version 2.3.

[Frédéric Bonnard]

Hi,
here is the packages in a PPA :
https://launchpad.net/~ibmpackages/+archive/ubuntu/kimchi-project/+packages

Note : kimchi dev team re-architectured the project and splitted kimchi into 
several components.
Ginger as a plugin remains ginger.
But kimchi got splitted as wok (the engine), ginger-base (a lib) and kimchi 
(plugin).
So :
- ginger got upgraded from 1.3.0.1-0ubuntu1 to 2.3.1-0ubuntu1 
- kimchi got upgraded from 1.5.0-0ubuntu1 to 2.3.1-0ubuntu2 but the package 
content undergone many changes
- 2 new packages need to be pushed in Zesty archive : wok (its d/changelog 
closes this LP) and ginger-base

Who can review this and eventually sponsor those 4 packages in Ubuntu Zesty ?
Thanks,
F.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1656281

Title:
  UbuntuKVM: Packaging: Update Wok, Gingerbase, Ginger, and Kimchi to
  version 2.3.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kimchi/+bug/1656281/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1592063] Re: 'rear' FTBFS asciidoc command not found

[Frédéric Bonnard]

Hi Dmitri,
the fix was in the pipe at the moment when you wrote this.
This should be fixed : https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=rear
Sorry for that and thanks for taking time to explain,

F.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1592063

Title:
  'rear' FTBFS asciidoc command not found

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rear/+bug/1592063/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1594670] Re: rpm on ubuntu 16.04 fails to honor non-zero exit from preun scriptlet

[Frédéric Bonnard]

My patch has landed in Debian, as rpm 4.12.0.1+dfsg1-6 and it got synced
in Ubuntu Yakkety.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1594670

Title:
  rpm on ubuntu 16.04  fails to honor non-zero exit from preun scriptlet

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rpm/+bug/1594670/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1594670] Re: rpm on ubuntu 16.04 fails to honor non-zero exit from preun scriptlet

[Frédéric Bonnard]

Here is the debdiff that applies on top of rpm-4.12.0.1+dfsg1 .

** Patch added: "rpm-fix-preun.debdiff"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rpm/+bug/1594670/+attachment/4699444/+files/rpm-fix-preun.debdiff

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1594670

Title:
  rpm on ubuntu 16.04  fails to honor non-zero exit from preun scriptlet

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rpm/+bug/1594670/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1594670] Re: rpm on ubuntu 16.04 fails to honor non-zero exit from preun scriptlet

[Frédéric Bonnard]

I sent a patch here : https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/74 .
Review seems positive, but we still need to wait for the merged.
I also opend the bug in Debian and sent the debdiff : 
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=830194 .
Would it be possible to have the patch pushed in the packaging for 16.04 ?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1594670

Title:
  rpm on ubuntu 16.04  fails to honor non-zero exit from preun scriptlet

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rpm/+bug/1594670/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1587424] [NEW] Sync libcxl 1.4-1 (universe) from Debian sid (main)

[Frédéric Bonnard]

Public bug reported:

Please sync libcxl 1.4-1 (universe) from Debian sid (main)

Explanation of the Ubuntu delta and why it can be dropped:

Hi,
libcxl has been accepted in Debian unstable with the new version 1.4, and
several fixes that were asked for in Debian and Ubuntu :

https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=813603#43
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1541457/comments/10

Thanks a lot for taking 1.3 some time ago : that helped a lot in the
meantime.

F.

Changelog entries since current xenial version 1.3-0ubuntu2:

libcxl (1.4-1) unstable; urgency=medium

  * Initial release (Closes: #813592)

 -- Frederic Bonnard   Mon, 01 Feb 2016
15:22:26 +0100

** Affects: libcxl (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1587424

Title:
  Sync libcxl 1.4-1 (universe) from Debian sid (main)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libcxl/+bug/1587424/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1576641] Re: -b option is not working

[Frédéric Bonnard]

** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #823407
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=823407

** Also affects: bsd-mailx (Debian) via
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=823407
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1576641

Title:
  -b option is not working

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bsd-mailx/+bug/1576641/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1541457] Re: [Ubuntu 16.04] New package libcxl user space library for CAPI

[Frédéric Bonnard]

Ok, so actually on xenial, cxl.h comes with linux-libc-dev. So the build 
doesn't try to fetch it online.
linux-libc-dev needs to be >=4.2 to have that header file, which is ok on 
xenial, so everything is good here.
I guess it's not needed to have a build-dep on linux-libc-dev>=4.2 as the 
default one on xenial is already greater than 4.2

I found that issue on Trusty while making a PPA, and linux-libc-dev is a
bit too old, so we lack cxl.h there, but I'll deal with that in the PPA

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1541457

Title:
  [Ubuntu 16.04] New package libcxl  user space library for CAPI

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1541457/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1541457] Re: [Ubuntu 16.04] New package libcxl user space library for CAPI

[Frédéric Bonnard]

Hi,
I saw that the compilation fetches a cxl.h header online, so here is patch, else
it will fail to build in the ubuntu schroot that prevents internet connexions.
Sorry for that,
F.

** Patch added: "libcxl.debdiff"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1541457/+attachment/4585665/+files/libcxl.debdiff

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1541457

Title:
  [Ubuntu 16.04] New package libcxl  user space library for CAPI

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1541457/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1549218] [NEW] gridengine enablement on ppc64el

[Frédéric Bonnard]

Public bug reported:

Hi,

at the moment gridengine is not build on ppc64el ; only gridengine-common is 
available on ppc64el and
it confuses some users  :

---
(xenial)ubuntu@vm7:~$ apt-cache search gridengine
gridengine-common - Distributed resource management - common files
python-drmaa - interface to DRMAA-compliant distributed resource management 
systems
(xenial)ubuntu@vm7:~$ apt-cache policy gridengine-common
gridengine-common:
  Installed: (none)
  Candidate: 6.2u5-7.4
  Version table:
 6.2u5-7.4 500
500 http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports xenial/universe ppc64el 
Packages
---

I've opened a bug on debian with a patch : 
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=815754
Can anyone help on this ?
Thanks again,

** Affects: gridengine (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Patch added: "ppc64el build enablement"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1549218/+attachment/4579850/+files/ppc64el.debdiff

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1549218

Title:
  gridengine enablement on ppc64el

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gridengine/+bug/1549218/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1543649] [NEW] Importing luajit from debian experimental for ppc64el support

[Frédéric Bonnard]

Public bug reported:

For ppc64el, we would need some patches submitted upstream and
importing the experimental version from debian (the patches for ppc64el are 
based on luajit 2.1)
Could you help on that ?
Here are the details on bugs.debian.org :
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=814255
Thanks again,

Fred

** Affects: luajit (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1543649

Title:
  Importing luajit from debian experimental for ppc64el support

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/luajit/+bug/1543649/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1509896] Re: IPMI USB SCSI endpoint discovery can fail on OpenPower machines

[Frédéric Bonnard]

Verification successfully done on Trusty with : ipmitool
1.8.13-1ubuntu0.6

According to the bug fix in git :

The current USB plugin doesn't find my IPMI channel:

  # ipmitool -I usb mc info
  Error in USB session setup

  Unable to setup interface usb
  Error loading interface usb

This is beacuse I have more than 8 scsi-generic devices that identify
as AMI:

  # grep -c ^AMI /proc/scsi/sg/device_strs
  13

On my machine :
root@abana:~# dpkg -l|grep ipmitool
ii  ipmitool1.8.13-1ubuntu0.6   
ppc64el  utility for IPMI control with kernel driver or LAN interface
root@abana:~# grep -c ^AMI /proc/scsi/sg/device_strs
13
root@abana:~# ipmitool -I usb mc info
Device ID : 32
Device Revision   : 1
Firmware Revision : 2.06
IPMI Version  : 2.0
Manufacturer ID   : 0
Manufacturer Name : Unknown
Product ID: 43707 (0xaabb)
Product Name  : Unknown (0xAABB)
Device Available  : yes
Provides Device SDRs  : no
Additional Device Support :
Sensor Device
SDR Repository Device
SEL Device
FRU Inventory Device
IPMB Event Receiver
IPMB Event Generator
Chassis Device
Aux Firmware Rev Info : 
0xca
0x48
0x01
0x00
root@abana:~# ipmitool -I usb lan print
Set in Progress : Set Complete
Auth Type Support   : MD5 
Auth Type Enable: Callback : MD5 
: User : MD5 
: Operator : MD5 
: Admin: MD5 
: OEM  : MD5 
IP Address Source   : DHCP Address
IP Address  : 9.101.18.66
Subnet Mask : 255.255.255.0
MAC Address : a0:42:3f:27:34:b8
SNMP Community String   : AMI
IP Header   : TTL=0x40 Flags=0x40 Precedence=0x00 TOS=0x10
BMC ARP Control : ARP Responses Enabled, Gratuitous ARP Disabled
Gratituous ARP Intrvl   : 0.0 seconds
Default Gateway IP  : 9.101.18.254
Default Gateway MAC : 00:12:79:04:36:80
Backup Gateway IP   : 0.0.0.0
Backup Gateway MAC  : 00:00:00:00:00:00
802.1q VLAN ID  : Disabled
802.1q VLAN Priority: 0
RMCP+ Cipher Suites : 0,1,2,3,6,7,8,11,12,15,16,17
Cipher Suite Priv Max   : caaaXXX
: X=Cipher Suite Unused
: c=CALLBACK
: u=USER
: o=OPERATOR
: a=ADMIN
: O=OEM
Bad Password Threshold  : 0
Invalid password disable: no
Attempt Count Reset Int.: 0
User Lockout Interval   : 0

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1509896

Title:
  IPMI USB SCSI endpoint discovery can fail on OpenPower machines

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ipmitool/+bug/1509896/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1509896] Re: IPMI USB SCSI endpoint discovery can fail on OpenPower machines

[Frédéric Bonnard]

Verification successfully done on Trusty with : ipmitool
1.8.13-1ubuntu0.6

According to the bug fix in git :

The current USB plugin doesn't find my IPMI channel:

  # ipmitool -I usb mc info
  Error in USB session setup

  Unable to setup interface usb
  Error loading interface usb

This is beacuse I have more than 8 scsi-generic devices that identify
as AMI:

  # grep -c ^AMI /proc/scsi/sg/device_strs
  13

On my machine :
root@abana:~# dpkg -l|grep ipmitool
ii  ipmitool1.8.13-1ubuntu0.6   
ppc64el  utility for IPMI control with kernel driver or LAN interface
root@abana:~# grep -c ^AMI /proc/scsi/sg/device_strs
13
root@abana:~# ipmitool -I usb mc info
Device ID : 32
Device Revision   : 1
Firmware Revision : 2.06
IPMI Version  : 2.0
Manufacturer ID   : 0
Manufacturer Name : Unknown
Product ID: 43707 (0xaabb)
Product Name  : Unknown (0xAABB)
Device Available  : yes
Provides Device SDRs  : no
Additional Device Support :
Sensor Device
SDR Repository Device
SEL Device
FRU Inventory Device
IPMB Event Receiver
IPMB Event Generator
Chassis Device
Aux Firmware Rev Info : 
0xca
0x48
0x01
0x00
root@abana:~# ipmitool -I usb lan print
Set in Progress : Set Complete
Auth Type Support   : MD5 
Auth Type Enable: Callback : MD5 
: User : MD5 
: Operator : MD5 
: Admin: MD5 
: OEM  : MD5 
IP Address Source   : DHCP Address
IP Address  : 9.101.18.66
Subnet Mask : 255.255.255.0
MAC Address : a0:42:3f:27:34:b8
SNMP Community String   : AMI
IP Header   : TTL=0x40 Flags=0x40 Precedence=0x00 TOS=0x10
BMC ARP Control : ARP Responses Enabled, Gratuitous ARP Disabled
Gratituous ARP Intrvl   : 0.0 seconds
Default Gateway IP  : 9.101.18.254
Default Gateway MAC : 00:12:79:04:36:80
Backup Gateway IP   : 0.0.0.0
Backup Gateway MAC  : 00:00:00:00:00:00
802.1q VLAN ID  : Disabled
802.1q VLAN Priority: 0
RMCP+ Cipher Suites : 0,1,2,3,6,7,8,11,12,15,16,17
Cipher Suite Priv Max   : caaaXXX
: X=Cipher Suite Unused
: c=CALLBACK
: u=USER
: o=OPERATOR
: a=ADMIN
: O=OEM
Bad Password Threshold  : 0
Invalid password disable: no
Attempt Count Reset Int.: 0
User Lockout Interval   : 0

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to ipmitool in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1509896

Title:
  IPMI USB SCSI endpoint discovery can fail on OpenPower machines

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ipmitool/+bug/1509896/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

[Bug 1459699] Re: Distribute Libvecpf 1.0.1 with Ubuntu

[Frédéric Bonnard]

As of latest xenial alpha release, libvecpf is not available.
Can the Canonical team let us know what is needed ?
Thank you :

ubuntu@vm80:~$ lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description:Ubuntu Xenial Xerus (development branch)
Release:16.04
Codename:   xenial
ubuntu@vm80:~$ apt-cache policy libvecpf
N: Unable to locate package libvecpf
ubuntu@vm80:~$ apt-cache search libvecpf
ubuntu@vm80:~$

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1459699

Title:
  Distribute Libvecpf 1.0.1 with Ubuntu

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1459699/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1505088] Re: Surelock: GA2: ppc64-diag package opal_errd not autostarting on Ubuntu 15.10 (in systemd)

[Frédéric Bonnard]

Here is a patch.
Some comments : 
- the Makefile installed the systemd unit files in the wrong system unit 
directory, so they were not detected and not enabled/started with 
dh_installinit so I did a small debian/patch.
- then once, the path is fixed the call to invoke-rc.d in the generated 
postinst did not start the daemons because "We never start disabled jobs;"(cf 
invoke-rc.d code) and we need to enable the daemons in the post-installation. I 
couldn't do it with "update-rc.d enable" in the configure step of the postinst 
script as "update-rc.d defaults" needs to be done before... So I used 
dh_systemd which uses dh_systemd_enable and dh_systemd_start.
I worked here.
Please review, thanks!

** Patch added: "enable-and-start-daemons.patch"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1505088/+attachment/4522831/+files/enable-and-start-daemons.patch

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1505088

Title:
  Surelock: GA2: ppc64-diag package opal_errd not autostarting on Ubuntu
  15.10 (in systemd)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1505088/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1486931] Re: [LTCTest][Opal][OP810] ipmitool 1.8.13-1ubuntu0.3 version is still not working for in-band HPM upgrade

[Frédéric Bonnard]

Hi,
I'm copying here what Pridhiviraj said internally at IBM :
"FW upgrade is successful with proposed ipmitool from trusty-proposed."
He did the upgrade from IBM-firestone-ibm-OP8_v1.6_0.38 to 
IBM-firestone-ibm-OP8_v1.7_0.3 with 

ubuntu@ltc-fire5:~$ dpkg --list | grep ipmitool
ii  ipmitool1.8.13-1ubuntu0.5ppc64el

that he got with apt-get from trusty-proposed.
Thanks to him.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1486931

Title:
  [LTCTest][Opal][OP810] ipmitool 1.8.13-1ubuntu0.3 version is still not
  working for in-band HPM upgrade

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ipmitool/+bug/1486931/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1486931] Re: [LTCTest][Opal][OP810] ipmitool 1.8.13-1ubuntu0.3 version is still not working for in-band HPM upgrade

[Frédéric Bonnard]

Hi,
I'm copying here what Pridhiviraj said internally at IBM :
"FW upgrade is successful with proposed ipmitool from trusty-proposed."
He did the upgrade from IBM-firestone-ibm-OP8_v1.6_0.38 to 
IBM-firestone-ibm-OP8_v1.7_0.3 with 

ubuntu@ltc-fire5:~$ dpkg --list | grep ipmitool
ii  ipmitool1.8.13-1ubuntu0.5ppc64el

that he got with apt-get from trusty-proposed.
Thanks to him.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to ipmitool in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1486931

Title:
  [LTCTest][Opal][OP810] ipmitool 1.8.13-1ubuntu0.3 version is still not
  working for in-band HPM upgrade

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ipmitool/+bug/1486931/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

[Bug 1486931] Re: [LTCTest][Opal][OP810] ipmitool 1.8.13-1ubuntu0.3 version is still not working for in-band HPM upgrade

[Frédéric Bonnard]

Hi,
just for the record :  I could build with Steve's patch on ppc64el 
(1.8.13-1ubuntu0.5) and flash successfully our firestone machine as before with 
1.8.13-1ubuntu0.4
F.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to ipmitool in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1486931

Title:
  [LTCTest][Opal][OP810] ipmitool 1.8.13-1ubuntu0.3 version is still not
  working for in-band HPM upgrade

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ipmitool/+bug/1486931/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

[Bug 1486931] Re: [LTCTest][Opal][OP810] ipmitool 1.8.13-1ubuntu0.3 version is still not working for in-band HPM upgrade

[Frédéric Bonnard]

Hi,
just for the record :  I could build with Steve's patch on ppc64el 
(1.8.13-1ubuntu0.5) and flash successfully our firestone machine as before with 
1.8.13-1ubuntu0.4
F.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1486931

Title:
  [LTCTest][Opal][OP810] ipmitool 1.8.13-1ubuntu0.3 version is still not
  working for in-band HPM upgrade

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ipmitool/+bug/1486931/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1481780] Re: ipmitool 1.8.13 needs 2 patches for OpenPower systems

[Frédéric Bonnard]

Thanks  David, I've tried the patch on the latest ipmitool source but I have a 
few problems :
- the patch does not apply on top of the already existing 
patch_memcpy_param.patch : I removed the latter from ubuntu debian/patches and 
I could apply all the series.
- when I compile the package I got this : 

make[3]: Entering directory `/home/ubuntu/tmp/ipmitool-1.8.13/lib'
/bin/bash ../libtool --silent --tag=CC   --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. 
-I.. -I../include-g -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -Wreturn-type -I 
/lib/modules/3.16.0-45-generic/build/include -MT helper.lo -MD -MP -MF 
.deps/helper.Tpo -c -o helper.lo helper.c
In file included from /usr/include/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/asm/ptrace.h:27:0,
 from /usr/include/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/asm/sigcontext.h:11,
 from /usr/include/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/bits/sigcontext.h:27,
 from /usr/include/signal.h:332,
 from helper.c:41:
/lib/modules/3.16.0-45-generic/build/include/linux/types.h:14:26: error: 
conflicting types for 'fd_set'
 typedef __kernel_fd_set  fd_set;
  ^
In file included from /usr/include/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/sys/types.h:219:0,
 from helper.c:33:
/usr/include/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/sys/select.h:75:5: note: previous 
declaration of 'fd_set' was here
   } fd_set;
 ^
In file included from /usr/include/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/asm/ptrace.h:27:0,
 from /usr/include/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/asm/sigcontext.h:11,
 from /usr/include/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/bits/sigcontext.h:27,
 from /usr/include/signal.h:332,
 from helper.c:41:
/lib/modules/3.16.0-45-generic/build/include/linux/types.h:15:25: error: 
conflicting types for 'dev_t'
 typedef __kernel_dev_t  dev_t;
 ^
In file included from helper.c:33:0:
/usr/include/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/sys/types.h:60:17: note: previous 
declaration of 'dev_t' was here
 typedef __dev_t dev_t;
 ^
In file included from /usr/include/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/asm/ptrace.h:27:0,
 from /usr/include/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/asm/sigcontext.h:11,
 from /usr/include/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/bits/sigcontext.h:27,
 from /usr/include/signal.h:332,
 from helper.c:41:
/lib/modules/3.16.0-45-generic/build/include/linux/types.h:19:17: error: 
conflicting types for 'nlink_t'
 typedef __u32   nlink_t;
 ^
In file included from helper.c:33:0:
/usr/include/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/sys/types.h:75:19: note: previous 
declaration of 'nlink_t' was here
 typedef __nlink_t nlink_t;
   ^
In file included from /usr/include/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/asm/ptrace.h:27:0,
 from /usr/include/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/asm/sigcontext.h:11,
 from /usr/include/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/bits/sigcontext.h:27,
 from /usr/include/signal.h:332,
 from helper.c:41:
/lib/modules/3.16.0-45-generic/build/include/linux/types.h:25:26: error: 
conflicting types for 'timer_t'
 typedef __kernel_timer_t timer_t;
  ^
In file included from /usr/include/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/sys/types.h:132:0,
 from helper.c:33:
/usr/include/time.h:103:19: note: previous declaration of 'timer_t' was here
 typedef __timer_t timer_t;
   ^
In file included from /usr/include/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/asm/ptrace.h:27:0,
 from /usr/include/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/asm/sigcontext.h:11,
 from /usr/include/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/bits/sigcontext.h:27,
 from /usr/include/signal.h:332,
 from helper.c:41:
/lib/modules/3.16.0-45-generic/build/include/linux/types.h:45:26: error: 
conflicting types for 'loff_t'
 typedef __kernel_loff_t  loff_t;
  ^
In file included from helper.c:33:0:
/usr/include/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/sys/types.h:44:18: note: previous 
declaration of 'loff_t' was here
 typedef __loff_t loff_t;
  ^
In file included from /usr/include/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/asm/ptrace.h:27:0,
 from /usr/include/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/asm/sigcontext.h:11,
 from /usr/include/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/bits/sigcontext.h:27,
 from /usr/include/signal.h:332,
 from helper.c:41:
/lib/modules/3.16.0-45-generic/build/include/linux/types.h:134:23: error: 
conflicting types for 'blkcnt_t'
 typedef unsigned long blkcnt_t;
   ^
In file included from helper.c:33:0:
/usr/include/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/sys/types.h:235:20: note: previous 
declaration of 'blkcnt_t' was here
 typedef __blkcnt_t blkcnt_t;  /* Type to count number of disk blocks.  */
^
In file included from /usr/include/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/asm/ptrace.h:27:0,
 from /usr/include/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/asm/sigcontext.h:11,
 from 

[Bug 1481780] Re: ipmitool 1.8.13 needs 2 patches for OpenPower systems

[Frédéric Bonnard]

Thanks  David, I've tried the patch on the latest ipmitool source but I have a 
few problems :
- the patch does not apply on top of the already existing 
patch_memcpy_param.patch : I removed the latter from ubuntu debian/patches and 
I could apply all the series.
- when I compile the package I got this : 

make[3]: Entering directory `/home/ubuntu/tmp/ipmitool-1.8.13/lib'
/bin/bash ../libtool --silent --tag=CC   --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. 
-I.. -I../include-g -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -Wreturn-type -I 
/lib/modules/3.16.0-45-generic/build/include -MT helper.lo -MD -MP -MF 
.deps/helper.Tpo -c -o helper.lo helper.c
In file included from /usr/include/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/asm/ptrace.h:27:0,
 from /usr/include/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/asm/sigcontext.h:11,
 from /usr/include/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/bits/sigcontext.h:27,
 from /usr/include/signal.h:332,
 from helper.c:41:
/lib/modules/3.16.0-45-generic/build/include/linux/types.h:14:26: error: 
conflicting types for 'fd_set'
 typedef __kernel_fd_set  fd_set;
  ^
In file included from /usr/include/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/sys/types.h:219:0,
 from helper.c:33:
/usr/include/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/sys/select.h:75:5: note: previous 
declaration of 'fd_set' was here
   } fd_set;
 ^
In file included from /usr/include/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/asm/ptrace.h:27:0,
 from /usr/include/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/asm/sigcontext.h:11,
 from /usr/include/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/bits/sigcontext.h:27,
 from /usr/include/signal.h:332,
 from helper.c:41:
/lib/modules/3.16.0-45-generic/build/include/linux/types.h:15:25: error: 
conflicting types for 'dev_t'
 typedef __kernel_dev_t  dev_t;
 ^
In file included from helper.c:33:0:
/usr/include/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/sys/types.h:60:17: note: previous 
declaration of 'dev_t' was here
 typedef __dev_t dev_t;
 ^
In file included from /usr/include/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/asm/ptrace.h:27:0,
 from /usr/include/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/asm/sigcontext.h:11,
 from /usr/include/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/bits/sigcontext.h:27,
 from /usr/include/signal.h:332,
 from helper.c:41:
/lib/modules/3.16.0-45-generic/build/include/linux/types.h:19:17: error: 
conflicting types for 'nlink_t'
 typedef __u32   nlink_t;
 ^
In file included from helper.c:33:0:
/usr/include/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/sys/types.h:75:19: note: previous 
declaration of 'nlink_t' was here
 typedef __nlink_t nlink_t;
   ^
In file included from /usr/include/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/asm/ptrace.h:27:0,
 from /usr/include/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/asm/sigcontext.h:11,
 from /usr/include/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/bits/sigcontext.h:27,
 from /usr/include/signal.h:332,
 from helper.c:41:
/lib/modules/3.16.0-45-generic/build/include/linux/types.h:25:26: error: 
conflicting types for 'timer_t'
 typedef __kernel_timer_t timer_t;
  ^
In file included from /usr/include/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/sys/types.h:132:0,
 from helper.c:33:
/usr/include/time.h:103:19: note: previous declaration of 'timer_t' was here
 typedef __timer_t timer_t;
   ^
In file included from /usr/include/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/asm/ptrace.h:27:0,
 from /usr/include/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/asm/sigcontext.h:11,
 from /usr/include/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/bits/sigcontext.h:27,
 from /usr/include/signal.h:332,
 from helper.c:41:
/lib/modules/3.16.0-45-generic/build/include/linux/types.h:45:26: error: 
conflicting types for 'loff_t'
 typedef __kernel_loff_t  loff_t;
  ^
In file included from helper.c:33:0:
/usr/include/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/sys/types.h:44:18: note: previous 
declaration of 'loff_t' was here
 typedef __loff_t loff_t;
  ^
In file included from /usr/include/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/asm/ptrace.h:27:0,
 from /usr/include/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/asm/sigcontext.h:11,
 from /usr/include/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/bits/sigcontext.h:27,
 from /usr/include/signal.h:332,
 from helper.c:41:
/lib/modules/3.16.0-45-generic/build/include/linux/types.h:134:23: error: 
conflicting types for 'blkcnt_t'
 typedef unsigned long blkcnt_t;
   ^
In file included from helper.c:33:0:
/usr/include/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/sys/types.h:235:20: note: previous 
declaration of 'blkcnt_t' was here
 typedef __blkcnt_t blkcnt_t;  /* Type to count number of disk blocks.  */
^
In file included from /usr/include/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/asm/ptrace.h:27:0,
 from /usr/include/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/asm/sigcontext.h:11,
 from 

[Bug 1467542] Re: [FFE] ship skiboot (opal-prd) 5.1.1

[Frédéric Bonnard]

** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #797987
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=797987

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1467542

Title:
  [FFE] ship skiboot (opal-prd) 5.1.1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/skiboot/+bug/1467542/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 1467542] Re: [FFE] ship skiboot (opal-prd) 5.1.1

[Frédéric Bonnard]

> Sorry, I can't sponsor this in Debian, but I can probably find someone
> who could.

That'd be nice ; give him/her my mail if I can be of any help in that process.
In addition, I opened an ITP on Debian :
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=797987

Jeremy said linux 4.2 should have everything.
I see it's in experimental but not in unstable ; is that ok to start ?

> As for the backport to 14.04; the package is in the queue for Trusty,
> awaiting review by archive admins/SRU team.

I saw that on https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/trusty/+queue
Thanks!

F.

> 
> -- 
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
> report.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1467542
> 
> Title:
>   [FFE] ship skiboot (opal-prd) 5.1.1
> 
> Status in skiboot package in Ubuntu:
>   Fix Released
> Status in skiboot source package in Trusty:
>   In Progress
> 
> Bug description:
>   [Impact]
>   Users of ppc64el POWER8 hardware / OPAL firmwares
> 
>   [Test case]
>   Testing this software requires real POWER8 hardware.
>   1) Run opal-prd on a POWER8 system
>   2) Verify that the daemon runs and is listening on /dev/opal-prd (which 
> needs to be provided by the kernel)
>   3) *TBD* (see below, firmware-provided code may be executed depending on 
> received events)
> 
>   [Regression Potential]
>   Minimal. This is hardware enablement software, not previously available in 
> Ubuntu, which is done in cooperation with and at the request of the hardware 
> manufacturer.
> 
>   ---
> 
>   This is a bug to track the inclusion of opal-prd package in Ubuntu.
>   The plan is to add it initially for 15.10 and later backport it to
>   14.04 archive.
> 
>   opal-prd is a daemon that listens for hardware diagnostic events (by
>   listening on the /dev/opal-prd device), and executes firmware-
>   providedexecutable code to handle these events.
> 
>   For now, the code lives inside https://github.com/open-
>   power/skiboot/tree/master/external/opal-prd.
> 
>   opal-prd/skiboot is specific to ppc64el
> 
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/skiboot/+bug/1467542/+subscriptions
>

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1467542

Title:
  [FFE] ship skiboot (opal-prd) 5.1.1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/skiboot/+bug/1467542/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 1467542] Re: [FFE] ship skiboot (opal-prd) 5.1.1

[Frédéric Bonnard]

Mathieu, thanks a bunch for this.
On the Debian side, it would be nice to push for it.
Do you have the possibility to sponsor that ?
Jeremy, I know that there are some needs on the kernel side, but there is a 4.2
in experimental, would it be enough ?

Fred

On Tue, 01 Sep 2015 17:14:37 -, Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre 
 wrote:
> skiboot (5.1.1-0ubuntu1) wily; urgency=medium
> 
>   * New upstream release.
>   * Dropped patches; applied upstream:
> - 0001-external-gard-add-Makefile-targets-to-make-debian-pa.patch
> - 0001-Honor-compilation-flags-passed-from-the-environment.patch
> - 0001-Fixes-for-compilation-with-Werror.patch
>   * debian/patches/uninitialized_uses.patch: fix up uninitialized variables
> that make our build fail
> 
> ** Changed in: skiboot (Ubuntu)
>Status: In Progress => Fix Released
> 
> -- 
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
> report.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1467542
> 
> Title:
>   [FFE] ship skiboot (opal-prd) 5.1.1
> 
> Status in skiboot package in Ubuntu:
>   Fix Released
> Status in skiboot source package in Trusty:
>   In Progress
> 
> Bug description:
>   [Impact]
>   Users of ppc64el POWER8 hardware / OPAL firmwares
> 
>   [Test case]
>   Testing this software requires real POWER8 hardware.
>   1) Run opal-prd on a POWER8 system
>   2) Verify that the daemon runs and is listening on /dev/opal-prd (which 
> needs to be provided by the kernel)
>   3) *TBD* (see below, firmware-provided code may be executed depending on 
> received events)
> 
>   [Regression Potential]
>   Minimal. This is hardware enablement software, not previously available in 
> Ubuntu, which is done in cooperation with and at the request of the hardware 
> manufacturer.
> 
>   ---
> 
>   This is a bug to track the inclusion of opal-prd package in Ubuntu.
>   The plan is to add it initially for 15.10 and later backport it to
>   14.04 archive.
> 
>   opal-prd is a daemon that listens for hardware diagnostic events (by
>   listening on the /dev/opal-prd device), and executes firmware-
>   providedexecutable code to handle these events.
> 
>   For now, the code lives inside https://github.com/open-
>   power/skiboot/tree/master/external/opal-prd.
> 
>   opal-prd/skiboot is specific to ppc64el
> 
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/skiboot/+bug/1467542/+subscriptions
>

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1467542

Title:
  [FFE] ship skiboot (opal-prd) 5.1.1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/skiboot/+bug/1467542/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1459700] Re: Distribute SPHDE 1.0.1 with Ubuntu

[Frédéric Bonnard]

We finally got a review of the debian packaging here : 
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=787491
I need to fix those now

** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #787491
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=787491

** Changed in: ubuntu
 Assignee: (unassigned) = Frédéric Bonnard (frediz)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1459700

Title:
  Distribute SPHDE 1.0.1 with Ubuntu

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1459700/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1467542] Re: Add new userspace package 'opal-prd'

[Frédéric Bonnard]

Jeremy, is upgrade to 5.1.1 required ?
For trusty I guess canonical would prefer to change the version as less as 
possible.
So, do we require this right away, orshould we wait an upcoming version which 
will bundles more important stuff later ?
Thanks for your insight.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1467542

Title:
  Add new userspace package 'opal-prd'

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1467542/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1468652] Re: Add new userspace package 'opal-prd'

[Frédéric Bonnard]

I don't know which should be made duplicate of the other, but the following bug 
is linked to this one :
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1467542

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1468652

Title:
  Add new userspace package 'opal-prd'

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1468652/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1467542] Re: Add new userspace package 'opal-prd'

[Frédéric Bonnard]

** Attachment added: skiboot_5.0.4-0ubuntu1.debian.tar.xz
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1467542/+attachment/4418642/+files/skiboot_5.0.4-0ubuntu1.debian.tar.xz

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1467542

Title:
  Add new userspace package 'opal-prd'

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1467542/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1467542] Re: Add new userspace package 'opal-prd'

[Frédéric Bonnard]

** Attachment added: skiboot_5.0.4-0ubuntu1.dsc
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1467542/+attachment/4418641/+files/skiboot_5.0.4-0ubuntu1.dsc

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1467542

Title:
  Add new userspace package 'opal-prd'

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1467542/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1467542] Re: Add new userspace package 'opal-prd'

[Frédéric Bonnard]

Here is a packaging for opal-prd based on what Jeremy Kerr did with some 
improvements.
As I understand, we need opal-prd kernel headers which is tracked in 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1439562 .
For the time being, Jeremy provided me a -linux-libc-dev .deb for 14.10 so I 
tested everything on 14.10 so far.
Here are the files attached. debian/changelog should be changed otherwise there 
should be no lintian, just a pedantic one for 
debian-watch-may-check-gpg-signature .

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1467542

Title:
  Add new userspace package 'opal-prd'

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1467542/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1467542] Re: Add new userspace package 'opal-prd'

[Frédéric Bonnard]

** Attachment added: skiboot_5.0.4-0ubuntu1.debian.tar.xz
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1467542/+attachment/4418602/+files/skiboot_5.0.4-0ubuntu1.debian.tar.xz

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1467542

Title:
  Add new userspace package 'opal-prd'

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1467542/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1467542] Re: Add new userspace package 'opal-prd'

[Frédéric Bonnard]

** Attachment added: skiboot_5.0.4-0ubuntu1.dsc
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1467542/+attachment/4418588/+files/skiboot_5.0.4-0ubuntu1.dsc

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1467542

Title:
  Add new userspace package 'opal-prd'

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1467542/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1467542] Re: Add new userspace package 'opal-prd'

[Frédéric Bonnard]

** Attachment added: skiboot_5.0.4.orig.tar.gz
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1467542/+attachment/4418601/+files/skiboot_5.0.4.orig.tar.gz

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1467542

Title:
  Add new userspace package 'opal-prd'

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1467542/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1467542] [NEW] Add new userspace package 'opal-prd'

[Frédéric Bonnard]

Public bug reported:

This is a bug to track the inclusion of opal-prd package in Ubuntu. The
plan is to add it initially for 15.10 and later backport it to 14.04
archive.

opal-prd is a daemon that listens for hardware diagnostic events (by
listening on the /dev/opal-prd device), and executes firmware-
providedexecutable code to handle these events.

For now, the code lives inside https://github.com/open-
power/skiboot/tree/master/external/opal-prd.

** Affects: ubuntu
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1467542

Title:
  Add new userspace package 'opal-prd'

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1467542/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1467542] Re: Add new userspace package 'opal-prd'

[Frédéric Bonnard]

Here is a packaging for opal-prd based on what Jeremy Kerr did with some 
improvements.
As I understand, we need opal-prd kernel headers which is tracked in 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1439562 .
For the time being, Jeremy provided me a -linux-libc-dev .deb for 14.10 so I 
tested everything on 14.10 so far.
Here are the files attached. debian/changelog should be changed otherwise there 
should be no lintian, just a pedantic one for 
debian-watch-may-check-gpg-signature .

** Attachment added: skiboot_5.0.3-1.dsc
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1467542/+attachment/4418568/+files/skiboot_5.0.3-1.dsc

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1467542

Title:
  Add new userspace package 'opal-prd'

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1467542/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1467542] Re: Add new userspace package 'opal-prd'

[Frédéric Bonnard]

** Attachment added: skiboot_5.0.3.orig.tar.gz
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1467542/+attachment/4418569/+files/skiboot_5.0.3.orig.tar.gz

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1467542

Title:
  Add new userspace package 'opal-prd'

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1467542/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1467542] Re: Add new userspace package 'opal-prd'

[Frédéric Bonnard]

** Attachment added: skiboot_5.0.3-1.debian.tar.xz
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1467542/+attachment/4418570/+files/skiboot_5.0.3-1.debian.tar.xz

** Package changed: linux (Ubuntu) = ubuntu

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1467542

Title:
  Add new userspace package 'opal-prd'

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1467542/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1408071] Re: [needs-packaging] [Ubuntu 15.04] Include latest Kimchi released upstream

[Frédéric Bonnard]

** Changed in: ubuntu
 Assignee: Taco Screen team (taco-screen-team) = Frédéric Bonnard (frediz)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1408071

Title:
  [needs-packaging] [Ubuntu 15.04] Include latest Kimchi released
  upstream

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1408071/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1457964] [NEW] pcre3: enable jit again on ppc64el

[Frédéric Bonnard]

Public bug reported:

In 8.35 it's not necessary to disable jit support on ppc64el. I sent a
patch on debian :

http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=786530

I can send a debdiff on Ubuntu, is it needed ?

F.

** Affects: pcre3 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1457964

Title:
  pcre3: enable jit again on ppc64el

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pcre3/+bug/1457964/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1443653] Re: Ubuntu 15.04 - Failed installation of ubuntu-desktop package (whoopsie package)

[Frédéric Bonnard]

I couldn't reproduce that exactly but got the same symptom on other packages.
From what I've been checking, I think this bug is the same problem as this one 
:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/+bug/1436448

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1443653

Title:
  Ubuntu 15.04 - Failed installation of ubuntu-desktop package (whoopsie
  package)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/whoopsie/+bug/1443653/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1443653] Re: Ubuntu 15.04 - Failed installation of ubuntu-desktop package (whoopsie package)

[Frédéric Bonnard]

I couldn't reproduce that exactly but got the same symptom on other packages.
From what I've been checking, I think this bug is the same problem as this one 
:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/+bug/1436448
So marking as duplicate of #122991

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1443653

Title:
  Ubuntu 15.04 - Failed installation of ubuntu-desktop package (whoopsie
  package)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/whoopsie/+bug/1443653/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1425699] Re: kernel panic on IBM Power8 PPC MAAS ephemeral image

[Frédéric Bonnard]

I got this also on the latest Ubuntu 14.04 : it's looping over this
indefinetly :

[0.193973]
[0.194023] Oops: Exception in kernel mode, sig: 4 [#3]
[0.194128] SMP NR_CPUS=2048 NUMA PowerNV
[0.194225] Modules linked in:
[0.194316] CPU: 3 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/3 Tainted: G  D   
3.13.0-48-generic #80-Ubuntu
[0.194403] task: c007f26957c0 ti: c007f2728000 task.ti: 
c007f2728000
[0.194477] NIP: c1598930 LR: c001897c CTR: c002abfc
[0.194551] REGS: c007f272b800 TRAP: 0e40   Tainted: G  D
(3.13.0-48-generic)
[0.194651] MSR: 90081001 SF,HV,ME,LE  CR: 22004088  XER: 
[0.194788] CFAR: c002ace4 SOFTE: 0
GPR00:  c007f272ba80 c1650610 22004088
GPR04: 0001 90001001 90001031 c1598930
GPR08:  90001033 c002abfc 8ae2
GPR12: 22004028 cfe40a80 c007f272bf90 
GPR16:    
GPR20: c09a18d0 0001 c150e367 c150f708
GPR24: c007f2728080 c16e4a80 c16e4f0c 0008
GPR28: c007f2728000 0003 90009033 c1708190
[0.195869] NIP [c1598930] power7_enter_nap_mode+0x0/0x18
[0.196001] LR [c001897c] .arch_cpu_idle+0x6c/0x160
[0.196092] Call Trace:
[0.196143] [c007f272bd70] [c001897c] .arch_cpu_idle+0x6c/0x160
[0.196285] [c007f272bdf0] [c0105c94] 
.cpu_startup_entry+0x1d4/0x300
[0.196462] [c007f272bec0] [c0040084] 
.start_secondary+0x344/0x380
[0.196626] [c007f272bf90] [c0009a6c] 
.start_secondary_prolog+0x10/0x14
[0.196787] Instruction dump:
[0.196859]        

[0.197109]        
 

See attached the log for more


** Attachment added: power7_enter_nap_mode.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1425699/+attachment/4364326/+files/power7_enter_nap_mode.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1425699

Title:
  kernel panic on IBM Power8 PPC MAAS ephemeral image

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1425699/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1410573] Re: Expert mode installation fails with error

[Frédéric Bonnard]

partman-auto upstream is ok, having a max of 5G.
The package in vivid just needs to be updated to the one in SId (124) :
https://launchpad.net/partman-auto :

partman-auto source package in Vivid Version 118ubuntu3 uploaded on 2014-04-11
partman-auto source package in Utopic Version 118ubuntu3 uploaded on 2014-04-11
partman-auto source package in Trusty Version 118ubuntu3 uploaded on 2014-04-11
partman-auto source package in Sid Version 124 uploaded on 2014-10-06

Debian Jessie is ok, using 124

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1410573

Title:
  Expert mode installation fails with error

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer/+bug/1410573/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1410573] Re: Expert mode installation fails with error

[Frédéric Bonnard]

Ok going deeper, the recipe for multi file systems specifies on 15.04
the following  for / :  /lib/partman/recipe_ppc64el/80multi

---
70 800 300 $default_filesystem
$lvmok{ }
$primary{ }
method{ format }
format{ }
use_filesystem{ }
$default_filesystem{ }
mountpoint{ / } .
---
~ # df -h
FilesystemSize  Used Available Use% Mounted on
none100.5M  2.3M 98.3M   2% /run
devtmpfs456.7M 0456.7M   0% /dev
/dev/vda2   268.9M177.7M 72.9M  71% /target

~ # chroot /target /bin/bash
root@vm7:/# apt-get -f install
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree   
Reading state information... Done
Correcting dependencies... Done
The following extra packages will be installed:
  linux-image-extra-3.18.0-9-generic
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  linux-image-extra-3.18.0-9-generic
0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
12 not fully installed or removed.
Need to get 0 B/36.6 MB of archives.
After this operation, 170 MB of additional disk space will be used.

So 177M free and 170M to install...

The maximum fs size for / is 300M rounded to cylinder size, according to
the recipe which is not enough :

Setting it to something bigger let the installation finish.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1410573

Title:
  Expert mode installation fails with error

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer/+bug/1410573/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1410573] Re: Expert mode installation fails with error

[Frédéric Bonnard]

Hi,
actually the problem is a disk space missing issue while installing 
linux-image-3.18.0-9-generic . For some reason, the disk layout may be
not enough. But I don't think this is related to ppc64el as I did the test on 
amd64 and got the same.
I'll do the test with older releases of Ubuntu  how it behaves and check if the 
layout is the same.

Fred

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1410573

Title:
  Expert mode installation fails with error

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer/+bug/1410573/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs