[Bug 304221]

This can be closed, they use a different system for resumes than they did then. (I'm the original reporter) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/304221 Title: Canonical Recruitment:

[Bug 1051559]

(In reply to Chris Pearce (:cpearce) from comment #19) We talked about this in Auckland, and we'd prefer to use our existing built-in backends for Ogg and WebM, since they've been fuzz tested and we know they're reliable. Maybe I'm misunderstanding this, but are there outstanding exploits that

[Bug 1051559]

Well according to https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/19.0/system- requirements/ the actual GTK requirements are at 2.18 or higher. Which does already push us to Ubuntu 10.04+, Debian Squeeze+, and to RHEL 6+. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 412647]

Are there plans to enable this in Linux builds? Should that be a separate Mozilla bug? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/412647 Title: Firefox is not able to play mp4 video tags To

[Bug 1289860]

I haven't been able to get it ever working on this card. It's a RV670 Radeon HD 3870. Prior to this most recent build it only worked with 3.1 Compatibility profile, not core. So this is the first NS2 build it could have worked on. I was not succesful getting it to work on fglrx legacy driver

[Bug 1289860]

Closing cause I switched video cards.. and it seems like the system requirements for NS2 were higher than an HD 3870 anyway. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1289860 Title: compiz

[Bug 1319941]

Submitted a fix in https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/10735/ My testing was run libreoffice --impress in the following scenarios: daemon off daemon on - just disable-publishing=yes daemon on - just disable-user-service-publishing=yes daemon on - publishing enabled, check to make sure it works --

[Bug 1319941]

Created attachment 103851 incomplete avahi fix I fixed the original issue by just checking if(client). However it seems like the issue goes deeper. Current error is - soffice.bin: thread-watch.c:132: avahi_threaded_poll_start: Assertion `!p-thread_running' failed. If a return statement is

[Bug 1350369]

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 81806 *** -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1350369 Title: [Upstream] soffice.bin crashed with SIGSEGV in _SaveBox::CreateNew() To

[Bug 1342175]

This call in (table6.cxx) aCol[nCol].SetString(nRow, nTab, aString, pDocument-GetAddressConvention()); is very slow, and appears to be further to the cause... Also in a ReplaceAll, for an reason I don't understand SetString is also called somewhere here: ScAddress aAdr( nCol, nRow, nTab );

[Bug 1342175]

I believe the issue was introduced specifically in this commit (by Kohei Yoshida): http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/sc/source/core/data/column3.cxx?id=c008dc483f8c6840803983e7e351cec6fdd32070 Specifically in the need to change how Delete works. -- You received this bug

[Bug 1342175]

Alright so I was wrong on the last count it's actually. - SearchCell - The last else statement - aCol[nCol].SetString(nRow, nTab, aString, pDocument-GetAddressConvention()); - aNewCell.release(*this, nRow); (In SetString, column3.cxx) - ScCellValue::release (cellvalue.cxx), it falls to default

[Bug 1342175]

My tests indicate the slowdown is in the bool ScTable::Search function (or in how it's called) in sc/source/core/data/table6.cxx. When comparing the speed of the function with FindAll vs ReplaceAll the performance for Replace All starts at about 141 times the Find all. By the end of the search

[Bug 1126858]

Still Reproducible in: 4.5.0.0.alpha0+ a8835936e9d3e19443c63b7b365174254741cf76 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1126858 Title: Search and replace, with tracked changes on, changing

[Bug 997934]

Sounds like bug 76238 has proposed a similar remedy. Perhaps one of these two should be closed as a dupe of the other? Status - NEEDINFO I'm fine with that solution, not sure which one to keep open though.. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 592434]

This is fixed Ubuntu 16.10, haven't investigated where the fix came from. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/592434 Title: ssh -X user@machine hangs when using exit to terminate To