[Bug 1899460] Re: tpm2_nvdefine without specifying the size issue

2020-11-27 Thread Ivan Hu
attached the debdiff for focal ** Attachment added: "debdiff_focal_v2" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tpm2-tools/+bug/1899460/+attachment/5438644/+files/debdiff_focal_v2 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. h

[Bug 1899460] Re: tpm2_nvdefine without specifying the size issue

2020-11-27 Thread Ivan Hu
attached the debdiff for groovy?field.comment=attached the debdiff for groovy ** Attachment added: "debdiff_groovy" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tpm2-tools/+bug/1899460/+attachment/5438690/+files/debdiff_groovy -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ub

[Bug 1899460] Re: tpm2_nvdefine without specifying the size issue

2020-11-27 Thread Ivan Hu
attached the debdiff for hirsute ** Attachment added: "debdiff_hirsute" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tpm2-tools/+bug/1899460/+attachment/5438712/+files/debdiff_hirsute -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. h

[Bug 1899460] Re: tpm2_nvdefine without specifying the size issue

2020-11-27 Thread Ivan Hu
attached the debdiff for hirsute ** Attachment added: "debdiff_hirsute" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tpm2-tools/+bug/1899460/+attachment/5438713/+files/debdiff_hirsute -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. h

[Bug 1899460] Re: tpm2_nvdefine without specifying the size issue

2020-12-02 Thread Ivan Hu
test done with focal and groovy, $sudo tpm2_nvdefine nv-index: 0x102 ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-focal verification-needed-groovy ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-focal verification-done-groovy -- You received this bug notification because yo

[Bug 1933547] Re: tpm driver causes non-fatal kernel crash on boot

2021-06-25 Thread Ivan Hu
The kernel seems try to set up the interrupt and send data, but failed. After got error returned, the kernel will disable interrupt and using polling instead. I beleve it will have the following messages in dmesg log kernel: tpm tpm0: tpm_try_transmit: send(): error -62 kernel: tpm tpm0: [Firmwar

[Bug 1899460] Re: tpm2_nvdefine without specifying the size issue

2020-12-21 Thread Ivan Hu
Test done with the proposed version, 4.1.1-1ubuntu0.20.04.1 on focal and 4.3.0-1ubuntu0.20.10 on groovy. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1899460 Title: tpm2_nvdefine without specifying

[Bug 1785033] Re: GRUB needs to support 64-bit efi linear frame buffer address

2018-09-05 Thread Ivan Hu
Attached the debdiff on xenial ** Attachment added: "grub2_x-debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1785033/+attachment/5184820/+files/grub2_x-debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https:/

[Bug 1785033] Re: GRUB needs to support 64-bit efi linear frame buffer address

2018-10-22 Thread Ivan Hu
Test with Dell's machine on Bionic with the grub2 bionic-proposed, got the correct 64-bit efi linear frame buffer address. [0.965079] efifb: probing for efifb [0.965086] efifb: framebuffer at 0x40, using 8100k, total 8100k [0.965087] efifb: mode is 1920x1080x32, linelength=768

[Bug 1785165] Re: firmware update on fwupdate version 10-3 not work on some AMI's firmwares

2018-11-08 Thread Ivan Hu
add debdiff, ** Attachment added: "fwupdat_b-debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fwupdate/+bug/1785165/+attachment/5210283/+files/fwupdat_b-debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launch

[Bug 1785033] Re: GRUB needs to support 64-bit efi linear frame buffer address

2018-11-08 Thread Ivan Hu
Test with Dell's machine on Xenial with the grub2 xenail-proposed, and update grub-efi-amd64 and grub-efi-amd64-signed packages got the correct 64-bit efi linear frame buffer address [0.923498] efifb: probing for efifb [0.923506] efifb: framebuffer at 0x40, using 8100k, total 8100

[Bug 1785165] Re: firmware update on fwupdate version 10-3 not work on some AMI's firmwares

2019-03-25 Thread Ivan Hu
Got confirmed from AMI Taipei team. This version fixes the Capsule issue on AMI's firmware. ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-bionic ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-bionic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, whi

[Bug 1785165] Re: firmware update on fwupdate version 10-3 not work on some AMI's firmwares

2019-03-27 Thread Ivan Hu
Here are testing procedures, 1. Install Ubuntu 18.04 and connect to internet 2. Perform Firmware Update, base on 10-3 (expeted fail due to capsule header issue) $sudo fwupdate -a {guid} 1AUOK.bin $sudo efibootmgr (check boot entry, next boot is create or not) $sudo reboot It failed to do firmwar

[Bug 1785033] Re: GRUB needs to support 64-bit efi linear frame buffer address

2019-01-30 Thread Ivan Hu
Test with Intel software development platform on Trusty with the grub2 trusty-proposed, after updating the grub-efi-amd64(signed), got the correct 64-bit efi linear frame buffer address [1.295327] efifb: probing for efifb [1.295344] efifb: framebuffer at 0x40, mapped to 0xc900

[Bug 1825128] Re: grub-efi-amd64-signed should depends on mokutil

2019-05-14 Thread Ivan Hu
What does grub-check-signatures use mokutil for? It makes more sense mokutil depends on shim not grub. Can mokutil depend on shim package solve your issue? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs

[Bug 1822043] Re: as enrolling mok, the font is too small in hi-dpi monitor

2019-08-08 Thread Ivan Hu
The patch has been upstreamed, https://github.com/rhboot/shim/pull/182 ** Changed in: shim (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1822043 Title: as

[Bug 1833297] Re: Ubuntu 19.04's Linux kernel 5.0.0-17 has regressed TPM2 functionality

2019-08-08 Thread Ivan Hu
The fix patch has been included in the latest disco kernel. I've tested it with version 5.0.0-23-generic, it worked. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Disco) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 1825128] Re: grub-efi-amd64-signed should depends on mokutil

2019-08-12 Thread Ivan Hu
shim-signed package has already depended on mokutil. When secureboot enabled, shim is needed and mokutil should be installed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1825128 Title: grub-efi-am

[Bug 1829982] Re: ltp_acpi from kernel_misc test suite in LTP failed

2019-09-17 Thread Ivan Hu
[ 504.084541] ltp_acpi_test: get register: 11 val: [ 504.084944] ltp_acpi_test: get register: 12 val: [ 504.085318] ACPI Exception: AE_BAD_ADDRESS, acpi_read_bit_register the fail is on read ID 0x13, which is on PM2 control bit 0(ARB_DIS). this failure is caused by the PM2 aren't suppor

[Bug 1829982] Re: ltp_acpi from kernel_misc test suite in LTP failed

2019-09-17 Thread Ivan Hu
** Changed in: ubuntu-kernel-tests Assignee: (unassigned) => Ivan Hu (ivan.hu) ** Changed in: ubuntu-kernel-tests Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.ne

[Bug 1829982] Re: ltp_acpi from kernel_misc test suite in LTP failed

2019-09-17 Thread Ivan Hu
fix patch sent for review, https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/pull/578 ** Changed in: ubuntu-kernel-tests Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bu

[Bug 1830359] Re: cpuset_base_ops from controller test suite in LTP failed

2019-09-20 Thread Ivan Hu
the failure, cpuset_base_ops 37 TFAIL: cpuset.cpus: Test result - Expected string - "0" are from testing the $/bin/echo "0-" > "$CPUSET/1/cpuset.cpus" and expecting "0" but got invalid parameter on cpuset_base_ops_testset.sh else base_op_test "$CPUSET/1/c

[Bug 1899460] Re: tpm2_nvdefine without specifying the size issue

2020-10-12 Thread Ivan Hu
attached the debdiff ** Attachment added: "tpm2-debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tpm2-tools/+bug/1899460/+attachment/5421237/+files/tpm2-debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launch

[Bug 1899460] [NEW] tpm2_nvdefine without specifying the size issue

2020-10-12 Thread Ivan Hu
Public bug reported: nvdefind tool takes the size MAX_NV_INDEX_SIZE(2048) as default, but got errors(0x2D5) returned on those platforms which don't have the size as default. https://github.com/tpm2-software/tpm2-tools/issues/2171 [Impact] Some machines which don't have enough MAX_NV_INDEX_SIZE a

[Bug 1909734] Re: TPM PCR checking will fail if the all characters are 0

2021-01-26 Thread Ivan Hu
There are bugs in the fwupd for reconstruct the PCR value on some platforms. https://github.com/fwupd/fwupd/pull/2394 >From the comment#1, tested pass with the new fwupd version. ** Changed in: fwts (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 1899460] Re: tpm2_nvdefine without specifying the size issue

2020-10-28 Thread Ivan Hu
attached the debdiff for focal ** Attachment added: "debdiff_focal" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tpm2-tools/+bug/1899460/+attachment/5428321/+files/debdiff_focal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https:/

[Bug 1899460] Re: tpm2_nvdefine without specifying the size issue

2020-11-03 Thread Ivan Hu
** Description changed: nvdefind tool takes the size MAX_NV_INDEX_SIZE(2048) as default, but got errors(0x2D5) returned on those platforms which don't have the size as default. https://github.com/tpm2-software/tpm2-tools/issues/2171 [Impact] - Some machines which don't have enough MAX_NV

[Bug 1822043] Re: as enrolling mok, the font is too small in hi-dpi monitor

2020-04-08 Thread Ivan Hu
The patch has been accepted upstream, and already in the Ubuntu release. ** Changed in: shim (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1822043

[Bug 1880663] Re: Dell Latitude 7300 sometimes stuck at purple screen after grub and fails to boot up

2020-05-31 Thread Ivan Hu
After restore OS to factory state(kernel 4.15.0-1037-oem, gub2 2.02-2ubuntu8.12), tested with more that 30 times, it worked fine. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1880663 Title: Dell La

[Bug 1880663] Re: Dell Latitude 7300 sometimes stuck at purple screen after grub and fails to boot up

2020-05-31 Thread Ivan Hu
Update grub2 to latest one (2.02-2ubuntu8.15), keep kernel version(4.15.0-1037-oem) and test more that 10 times, it worked fine. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1880663 Title: Dell Lat

[Bug 1880663] Re: Dell Latitude 7300 sometimes stuck at purple screen after grub and fails to boot up

2020-05-31 Thread Ivan Hu
Update kernel to 4.15.1081-oem with "apt upgrade" and it got fail to reboot. >From above testings, I think we should bisect kernel to see which kernel patch cause the issue. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs

[Bug 1881710] [NEW] tpm: fix TIS locality timeout problems

2020-06-02 Thread Ivan Hu
Public bug reported: [Impact] It has been reported that some TIS based TPMs are giving unexpected errors when using the O_NONBLOCK path of the TPM device. The problem is that some TPMs don't like it when you get and then relinquish a locality (as the tpm_try_get_ops()/tpm_put_ops() pair does) w

[Bug 1881710] Re: tpm: fix TIS locality timeout problems

2020-06-02 Thread Ivan Hu
** Also affects: linux-oem-5.6 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux-oem-osp1 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.laun

[Bug 1881710] Re: tpm: fix TIS locality timeout problems

2020-06-02 Thread Ivan Hu
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux-oem-osp1 (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux-oem-5.6 (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** No longer affects: linux-oem-o

[Bug 1881710] Re: tpm: fix TIS locality timeout problems

2020-06-02 Thread Ivan Hu
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: (unassigned) => Ivan Hu (ivan.hu) ** Changed in: linux-oem-5.6 (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: (unassigned) => Ivan Hu (ivan.hu) ** Changed in: linux-oem-osp1 (Ubuntu Bionic) Assignee: (unassigned) => Ivan Hu (ivan.hu) ** Changed

[Bug 1880663] Re: Dell Latitude 7300 sometimes stuck at purple screen after grub and fails to boot up

2020-06-11 Thread Ivan Hu
After restore OS to factory state and directly update to latest kernel with "apt install linux-oem", it will not hang. It seems not the kernel issue. May upgrade certain package that cause the issue. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribe

[Bug 1880663] Re: Dell Latitude 7300 sometimes stuck at purple screen after grub and fails to boot up

2020-06-11 Thread Ivan Hu
After restore OS to factory state and directly update intel-microcode by "apt install intel-microcode", then will meet this issue. this should be the intel-microcode issue. the info of intel-microcode, before update, [1.131499] microcode: sig=0x806eb, pf=0x80, revision=0xc6 [1.132064] micr

[Bug 1884485] [NEW] 15+1533136590.3beb971-0ubuntu1 fail to build with gcc9(focal)

2020-06-22 Thread Ivan Hu
Public bug reported: The latest shim upload does not seem able to build with gcc9(under Focal). Got error message, MokManager.c: In function ‘write_back_mok_list’: MokManager.c:1080:19: error: taking address of packed member of ‘struct ’ may result in an unaligned pointer value [-Werror=address-

[Bug 1785165] Re: firmware update on fwupdate version 10-3 not work on some AMI's firmwares

2019-03-12 Thread Ivan Hu
It seems the proposed release packages still be pending, amd64 - Pending publication arm64 - Pending publication armhf - Pending publication i386 - Pending publication https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fwupdate -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, whi

[Bug 1833297] Re: Ubuntu 19.04's Linux kernel 5.0.0-17 has regressed TPM2 functionality

2019-06-24 Thread Ivan Hu
** Description changed: Hi, With all updates installed to Ubuntu disco it is impossible to use TPM2 device on the machine. Most of the TPM2 commands seem to fail due to Linux kernel having async access problem that is fixed in linux kernel 5.0.10 release. With previous Ubuntu

[Bug 1833297] Re: Ubuntu 19.04's Linux kernel 5.0.0-17 has regressed TPM2 functionality

2019-06-24 Thread Ivan Hu
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Disco) Status: New => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1833297 Title: Ubuntu 19.04's Linux kernel 5.0.0-17 has regressed TPM2 functiona

[Bug 1698277] Re: fwts's supports to UEFI 2.7

2018-04-18 Thread Ivan Hu
** Changed in: fwts (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1698277 Title: fwts's supports to UEFI 2.7 To manage notifications about this bug go to

[Bug 1698277] Re: fwts's supports to UEFI 2.7

2018-04-18 Thread Ivan Hu
prepare to add some tests for EFI_VARIABLE_AUTHENTICATION_3 in UEFI 2.7 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1698277 Title: fwts's supports to UEFI 2.7 To manage notifications about this

[Bug 1785033] Re: GRUB needs to support 64-bit efi linear frame buffer address

2018-08-15 Thread Ivan Hu
** Description changed: [Rationale] - More firmwares support above 4G mmio configuration and the EFI Graphics Output Protocol can return a 64-bit linear frame buffer address have been implemented in some firmware/BIOS. Grub2 currently only pass 32-bit framebuffer base to kernel. The Linux ker

[Bug 1785033] Re: GRUB need to support 64-bit efi linear frame buffer address

2018-08-02 Thread Ivan Hu
Attach the fix patch which has been accepted and committed. ** Patch added: "0001-i386-linux-Add-support-for-ext_lfb_base.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1785033/+attachment/5170756/+files/0001-i386-linux-Add-support-for-ext_lfb_base.patch -- You received this bug

[Bug 1785033] [NEW] GRUB needs to support 64-bit efi linear frame buffer address

2018-08-02 Thread Ivan Hu
Public bug reported: [Rationale] More firmwares support above 4G mmio configureation and the EFI Graphics Output Protocol can return a 64-bit linear frame buffer address have been implemented in some firmware/BIOS. Grub2 currently only pass 32-bit framebuffer base to kernel. The Linux kernel ha

[Bug 1785033] Re: GRUB need to support 64-bit efi linear frame buffer address

2018-08-02 Thread Ivan Hu
The patch on comment#1 have been tested can fix the block booting issue on some Dell machines. ** Summary changed: - GRUB need to support 64-bit efi linear frame buffer address + GRUB needs to support 64-bit efi linear frame buffer address -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 1785033] Re: GRUB needs to support 64-bit efi linear frame buffer address

2018-08-02 Thread Ivan Hu
** Description changed: [Rationale] More firmwares support above 4G mmio configureation and the EFI Graphics Output Protocol can return a 64-bit linear frame buffer address have been implemented in some firmware/BIOS. Grub2 currently only pass 32-bit framebuffer base to kernel. The Linux ke

[Bug 1785165] Re: firmware update on fwupdate version 10-3 not work on AMI's firmware

2018-08-02 Thread Ivan Hu
Attached the fixed patch ** Patch added: "0001-Let-s-see-if-this-works-with-that-number-smaller.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fwupdate/+bug/1785165/+attachment/5170974/+files/0001-Let-s-see-if-this-works-with-that-number-smaller.patch -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 1785165] [NEW] firmware update on fwupdate version 10-3 not work on AMI's firmware

2018-08-02 Thread Ivan Hu
Public bug reported: [Rationale] The commited patch, Handle ux capsule updates, https://github.com/rhboot/fwupdate/commit/2561423dd68622dcf8a7542709f332edb517d34e, change to calculate CapsuleBlockDesc Length = CapsuleHeader.CapsuleImageSize + HeaderSize, but on AMI BIOS image which is without c

[Bug 1785165] Re: firmware update on fwupdate version 10-3 not work on AMI's firmware

2018-08-02 Thread Ivan Hu
** Description changed: [Rationale] - The commited patch, Handle ux capsule updates, https://github.com/rhboot/fwupdate/commit/2561423dd68622dcf8a7542709f332edb517d34e, change to calculate CapsuleBlockDesc Length = CapsuleHeader.CapsuleImageSize + HeaderSize, but on AMI BIOS image which is wi

[Bug 1785165] Re: firmware update on fwupdate version 10-3 not work on some AMI's firmware

2018-08-02 Thread Ivan Hu
** Summary changed: - firmware update on fwupdate version 10-3 not work on AMI's firmware + firmware update on fwupdate version 10-3 not work on some AMI's firmware ** Summary changed: - firmware update on fwupdate version 10-3 not work on some AMI's firmware + firmware update on fwupdate versio

[Bug 1785165] Re: firmware update on fwupdate version 10-3 not work on some AMI's firmwares

2018-08-02 Thread Ivan Hu
@Mario, Actually I have built a test package 10-3.3 on my test PPA, https://launchpad.net/~ivan.hu/+archive/ubuntu/test.ppa, base on 10-3 and with the only fixed patch, and got confirmed that can fix the fwupdate issue from OEM. What other patches do you think we also need to SRU? I also tested

[Bug 1635502] Re: segment fault when running fwts method test

2016-11-24 Thread Ivan Hu
** Changed in: fwts Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1635502 Title: segment fault when running fwts method test To manage notifications abo

[Bug 1644806] Re: Proposed shim package will cause system complain "Failed to set MokSBStateRT: (2) Invalid Parameter"

2016-11-28 Thread Ivan Hu
This issue is caused by the Dell machines have already embedded the MokSBStatesRT variable with EFI_VARIABLE_NON_VOLATILE attribute, and the new shim-signed 1.21.4 include the patch which will mirror the MokSBStatesRT when MokSBState exists, see the https://github.com/rhinstaller/shim/commit/8f1bd6

[Bug 1644806] Re: Proposed shim package will cause system complain "Failed to set MokSBStateRT: (2) Invalid Parameter"

2016-11-30 Thread Ivan Hu
@Steve The machines have been in production and sold more than one year. Unfortunately the error message is print out by console error, console_error(L"Failed to set MokSBStateRT", efi_status); It will block the boot with ugly full blue screen and wait for user's "enter" to continue to boot. I

[Bug 1603026] Re: fwts mtrr should test IA32_MTTR_DEF_TYPE before running the test

2017-06-15 Thread Ivan Hu
Fix patches have been included to V17.06.00. ** Changed in: fwts (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Ivan Hu (ivan.hu) ** Changed in: fwts (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscri

[Bug 1684034] Re: Some Dell and Lenovo systems do not work after BIOS Capsule Update

2017-06-21 Thread Ivan Hu
Have modified 4 required patches base on the fwupdate 0.5 for Xenial, - 0001-fwupdate-fix-memory-leaks-and-storing-update_table-t.patch: fwupdate: fix memory leaks and storing update_table to NULL pointer. commit 765bb7221af37ac56b11ef2253bf1bb3230ef589 - 0001-fwupdate.efi-use-

[Bug 1746114] Re: Move xenial to fwupd 0.8.x branch

2018-02-12 Thread Ivan Hu
testing with Dell XPS 13 9360 Got UEFI firmware update failed: Unknown error -1 Also check the PPA on comment#1 the same result UEFI firmware update failed: Unknown error -1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https:/

[Bug 1734278] [NEW] Grub2 cannot boot up when 8254 time function disable

2017-11-23 Thread Ivan Hu
Public bug reported: Fail to boot into Ubuntu GRUB on the platforms which legacy(8254) timer function is disabled. "8254 clock gating" is provided to disable 8254 timer to get rid of legacy and save power. The platforms with the firmware which disable the 8254 timer will fail to boot up and blo

[Bug 1734278] Re: Grub2 cannot boot up when 8254 time function disable

2017-11-23 Thread Ivan Hu
The patch which fixed this issue has included in the upstream git repository, http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/grub.git/commit/?id=446794de8da4329ea532cbee4ca877bcafd0e534 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.la

[Bug 1191691] Re: [Dell Latitude E6330] Many ACPI HIGH failures during suspend test

2013-11-26 Thread Ivan Hu
from comment#5 set it Fix Released ** Changed in: acpi (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1191691 Title: [Dell Latitude E6330] Many ACPI

[Bug 1253871] Re: [Dell Inspiron 5437] HIGH failure: FADTPM1AInvalidWidth, reported in fadt test by fwts

2013-12-03 Thread Ivan Hu
** Changed in: linux-lts-raring (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1253871 Title: [Dell Inspiron 5437] HIGH failure: FADTPM1AInvalidWidth, repor

[Bug 1148649] Re: HP Pavilion G7 - FWTS HIGH errors during suspend/resume and batch testing

2013-11-07 Thread Ivan Hu
for the _Q33 -> no CMOS handler. The issue is the same as the bug#1143312, Upstream has a patch to fix this issue. This shall be included in kernel 3.11, The patch will be backported to 3.9+ kernel and will be included in ubuntu 13.10, please refer to, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/l

[Bug 1151664] Re: HP Pavilion g7 - FWTS failures when doing cert testing

2013-11-07 Thread Ivan Hu
For the no handler issue, The issue is the same as the bug#1143312, Upstream has a patch to fix this issue. This shall be included in kernel 3.11, The patch will be backported to 3.9+ kernel and will be included in ubuntu 13.10, please refer to, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug

[Bug 1232975] Re: [Dell Optiplex 9020] High kernel failures in suspend / hibernate log.

2013-11-11 Thread Ivan Hu
The _WAK error, s4: HIGH Kernel message: [322397.358723] ACPI Error: Field [PMS1] access width (1 bytes) too large for region [SWCR] (length 0) (20121018/exfldio-195) s4: HIGH Kernel message: [322397.358724] ACPI Error: Field [PMS1] Base+Offset+Width 2+0+1 is beyond end of region [SWCR] (length

[Bug 1232975] Re: [Dell Optiplex 9020] High kernel failures in suspend / hibernate log.

2013-11-11 Thread Ivan Hu
s4: HIGH Kernel message: [322397.481202] ACPI Error: Field [DRQL] at 144 exceeds Buffer [NULL] size 128 (bits) (20121018/dsopcode-236) s4: HIGH Kernel message: [322397.481205] ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed [\_SB_.PCI0.LPCB.SIO1.DSRS] (Node 880427c4e7a8), AE_AML_BUFFER_LIMIT (201

[Bug 1233031] Re: [Dell Optiplex 9020] Critical / High failures in fwts report

2013-11-11 Thread Ivan Hu
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1232975 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1232975 the same bug as #1232975 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1232975 [Dell Optiplex 9020] High kernel failures in suspend / hibernate log. -- You received this bug notification because you a

[Bug 1262033] Re: [Dell Inspiron 3537] Multiple CRITICAL/HIGH failures found in fwts report

2014-04-24 Thread Ivan Hu
more information for comment#5 The _PLD failures come from the buggy firmware, from acpi spec, This _PLD optional object is a method that conveys to OSPM a general description of the physical location of a device’s external connection point. I don't think _PLD failures will cause affect any devic

[Bug 1308480] Re: [HP Pavilion 20 AIO] High failures (DevConfigDiffAfterS3) found in suspend / hibernate report

2014-04-24 Thread Ivan Hu
Carefully comparing them found BYTE 7 is changed from 0x08, 0x40 to 0x00, it is Status Register(These read-only bits reflect the temporary status of the device/function when fwst read the register). These bits are "Signaled Target Abort", "Signaled System Error". This can indicate that before sleep

[Bug 1280103] Re: [Dell Optiplex 3020 SFF] CRITICAL / HIGH failures found in FWTS report

2014-03-27 Thread Ivan Hu
The S1, S2 should work in fwts V14.02.00 ** Changed in: linux-lts-saucy (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1280103 Title: [Dell Optiplex 3

[Bug 1312559] Re: [Lenovo T540p] DevConfigDiffAfterS3 and DevConfigDiffAfterS4

2014-05-15 Thread Ivan Hu
Compare with the PCI configure registers that change between sleep/wake are the offset 0x2c~0x2f, which are the subsystem vendor ID and subsystem ID, these IDs can mainly be used for further identification of a device. If the chip in itself is a generic interface chip to a local (onboard) bus, it i

[Bug 1312559] Re: [Lenovo T540p] DevConfigDiffAfterS3 and DevConfigDiffAfterS4

2014-05-15 Thread Ivan Hu
** Changed in: linux-lts-saucy (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1312559 Title: [Lenovo T540p] DevConfigDiffAfterS3 and DevConfigDiffAfterS4 To

[Bug 1629826] Re: fwts-efi-runtime-dkms should not depend on the kernel headers

2016-10-03 Thread Ivan Hu
@ Colin, I recalled it seems we got the irrelevant headers installed, so we specified the header dependency. Removed all header dependencies seems a good solution. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad

[Bug 1673744] Re: Fwupdmgr does not work on Ubuntu 16.04.2

2017-03-21 Thread Ivan Hu
@Richard, Do you mean that *.cab only needs to include firmware.bin and firmware.metainfo.xml? For old and new version can both support by removing firmware.inf from *.cab? ** Changed in: fwupd (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: Won't Fix => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 1644806] Re: Proposed shim package will cause system complain "Failed to set MokSBStateRT: (2) Invalid Parameter"

2017-02-06 Thread Ivan Hu
the patch has been accepted by upstream, commit# 07bda58596608f05bfa035a1cc5710f5ac8ea3d9 on https://github.com/rhinstaller/shim -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1644806 Title: Propose

[Bug 1635502] Re: segment fault when running fwts method test

2016-11-08 Thread Ivan Hu
verify with fwts V16.09.00 with Yakkety-proposed, Xenial-proposed, Trusty-proposed, All pass with fwts method tests. ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu

[Bug 1581299] Re: shim: set second stage not work

2016-11-09 Thread Ivan Hu
Verify the shim-signed 1.21.4 with yakkety-proposed, it could fix the second stage issue of shim. ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launc

[Bug 1581299] Re: shim: set second stage not work

2016-11-18 Thread Ivan Hu
Verify the shim-signed 1.21.4 with xenial-proposed and trusty-proposed, they could fix the second stage issue of shim. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1581299 Title: shim: set second s

[Bug 1642118] Re: Several TPM2.0 tests fail

2017-01-08 Thread Ivan Hu
@gerald, Which machine you are using? Could you attach more detail fail log? Looks like you don't run resourcemgr accordingly. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1642118 Title: Several T

[Bug 1642118] Re: Several TPM2.0 tests fail

2017-01-10 Thread Ivan Hu
get the machine from gerald, Ford-DVT2-C1, after build and re-install tpm2-tools v1.1.0 and TPM2-TSS 1.0.0 most tests pass test_tpm2_takeownership_all.sh pass test_tpm2_nv.sh pass test_tpm2_listpcrs.sh pass test_tpm2_getrandom.sh pass test_tpm2_load.sh pass test_tpm2_loadexternal.sh pass test_tpm

[Bug 1684034] Re: Some Dell and Lenovo systems do not work after BIOS Capsule Update

2017-07-19 Thread Ivan Hu
I've tested it with xenail, it worked. And also asked Lenovo to help to test with their platforms with multiple capsules support. Confirmed work fine. ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done-xenial -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ub

[Bug 1581299] Re: shim: set second stage not work

2017-03-27 Thread Ivan Hu
Verify the shim-signed 1.27 with yakkety-proposed and xenial-proposed, it works fine on the second stage of shim. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1581299 Title: shim: set second stage

[Bug 1581299] Re: shim: set second stage not work

2016-07-25 Thread Ivan Hu
Here is the efibootmgr -v for your request. BootNext: 0007 BootCurrent: 0006 Timeout: 0 seconds BootOrder: 0006,0001,,0002,0003,0004 Boot* UEFI Internal Shell FvVol(cdbb7b35-6833-4ed6-9ab2-57d2acddf6f0)/FvFile(7c04a583-9e3e-4f1c-ad65-e05268d0b4d1) Boot0001* Enter Setup FvVol(cdbb7b35

[Bug 1606480] Re: Incomplete dependencies for Linux headers.

2016-07-26 Thread Ivan Hu
** Changed in: fwts (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Ivan Hu (ivan.hu) ** Changed in: fwts (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1

[Bug 1606480] Re: Incomplete dependencies for Linux headers

2016-07-26 Thread Ivan Hu
Patch has sent for review, https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/fwts-devel/2016-July/008282.html -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1606480 Title: Incomplete dependencies for Linux headers

[Bug 1581299] Re: shim: set second stage not work

2016-05-12 Thread Ivan Hu
Sent out a patch fixing the set second stage function for loadoption. And have been accepted on https://github.com/rhinstaller/shim ** Patch added: "0001-shim-dealing-with-only-one-string-on-loadoption.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shim/+bug/1581299/+attachment/4661695/+f

[Bug 1581299] [NEW] shim: set second stage not work

2016-05-12 Thread Ivan Hu
Public bug reported: Using the applications such as fwupdate and efibootmgr to set the device path for the second stage path is not working on some platforms. The second stage set is not working after commit 3322257e611e2000f79726d295bb4845bbe449e7 on https://github.com/rhinstaller/shim for those

[Bug 1609209] [NEW] Disable signature validation on shim without user interactions under secureboot enabled

2016-08-02 Thread Ivan Hu
Set.efi need to be signed with Canonical key. ** Affects: shim-signed (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Ivan Hu (ivan.hu) Status: Confirmed ** Attachment added: "shim_dis_valid.tar.gz" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1609209/+attachment/4712747/+files/shim_dis_

[Bug 1609209] Re: Disable signature validation on shim without user interactions under secureboot enabled

2016-08-02 Thread Ivan Hu
** Changed in: shim-signed (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1609209 Title: Disable signature validation on shim without user interactions under

[Bug 1635502] Re: segment fault when running fwts method test

2016-10-31 Thread Ivan Hu
@Colin, I've tried acpidump log last week but cannot reproduce the issue. Unfortunately, I cannot get the machine which can reproduce the issue, since the QA has been testing with it last week and not allow me to touch it. I need to wait for a week after QA finish testing. -- You received this

[Bug 1642118] Re: Several TPM2.0 tests fail

2016-12-07 Thread Ivan Hu
Those failures are mostly due to the tests use "tpm2_takeownership -c" to clear the Hierarchy auth fail Start to clear the Hierarchy auth ClearControl Failed ! ErrorCode: 0x9a2 Error Code 0x9a2 means "TPM ERROR: SESSION #1, TPM_RC_BAD_AUTH: authroization failure without DA implications".

[Bug 1335026] Re: [Dell OptiPlex 3011] Sometimes system won't be able to run suspend stress test

2014-07-10 Thread Ivan Hu
the error, s3: HIGH Kernel message: [ 457.594493] ACPI Error: Field [DRQL] at 144 exceeds Buffer [NULL] size 128 (bits) (20131115/dsopcode-236) s3: HIGH Kernel message: [ 457.594498] ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed [\_SB_.PCI0.LPCB.SIO1.DSRS] (Node 880079715c58), AE_AML_BUFFER_L

[Bug 1335026] Re: [Dell OptiPlex 3011] Sometimes system won't be able to run suspend stress test

2014-07-10 Thread Ivan Hu
into it. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Assignee: Ivan Hu (ivan.hu) => Anthony Wong (anthonywong) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1335026 Title: [Dell OptiPlex 3011] Someti

[Bug 1273924] Re: [Dell Precision T1700] CRITICAL / HIGH failures found in fwts report

2014-09-01 Thread Ivan Hu
** Changed in: linux-lts-trusty (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1273924 Title: [Dell Precision T1700] CRITICAL / HIGH failures found in

[Bug 1345897] Re: [Dell Inspiron 3541] High failures found in fwts klog test

2014-09-02 Thread Ivan Hu
the failures are form buggy firmware, set the method _PSR as NotSerialized, but create the objects. As from the ACPI spec mention, Functions are equivalent to a Method that specifies NotSerialized. As such, a function should not create any named objects, since a second thread that might re-enter

[Bug 1285477] Re: [Dell Latitude 3440] fwts HIGH failures

2014-09-02 Thread Ivan Hu
The failure, klog: HIGH Kernel message: [ 0.00] ACPI Error: Gpe0Block - 32-bit FADT register is too long (32 bytes, 256 bits) to convert to GAS struct - 255 bits max, truncating (20130517/tbfadt-202) is due to the setting length of GPE0 Block is 32 bytes, over the kernel expectation(255 bit

[Bug 1285477] Re: [Dell Latitude 3440] fwts HIGH failures

2014-09-02 Thread Ivan Hu
For the S1,S2 failures, The failures come from firmware not provide _S1 and _S2 objects, so that the kernel complains about cannot find _S1,_S2 namespace objects that contains the register values for the sleep state when kernel would like to setup all the sleep state information. This means kern

[Bug 1436784] Re: fwts-efi-runtime-dkms 15.03.00-0ubuntu1: fwts-efi-runtime-dkms kernel module failed to build

2015-06-03 Thread Ivan Hu
this should due to the headers were not installed. please refer to bug#1414946 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fwts/+bug/1414946 ** Changed in: fwts (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 1452979] Re: [Lenovo W550s] 'Run Firmware Test Suite (fwts) desktop-specific diagnosis tests' test case is always fail.

2015-06-09 Thread Ivan Hu
the failures, klog: CRITICAL Kernel message: [ 65.525879] CPU0: Core temperature above threshold, cpu clock throttled (total events = 1) klog: CRITICAL Kernel message: [ 65.525891] CPU1: Core temperature above threshold, cpu clock throttled (total events = 1) klog: CRITICAL Kernel message:

  1   2   3   >