[Bug 910363]

2012-01-07 Thread Jamborm
Patch backporting the fix has been posted to the mailing list: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-01/msg00300.html -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/910363 Title: miscompile writing

[Bug 910363]

2012-01-07 Thread Jamborm
(In reply to comment #3) Where 4.6 says: Candidate (2069): this ! Disqualifying this - Encountered a bit-field access. which hints at what needs backporting. Martin? Right, this seems to be PR 45644, for some reason I did not backport the fix to 4.5. It should be fixed by committing

[Bug 910363]

2012-01-10 Thread Jamborm
Author: jamborm Date: Mon Jan 9 18:40:09 2012 New Revision: 183023 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=183023 Log: 2012-01-09 Martin Jambor mjam...@suse.cz PR tree-optimization/51759 Backport from mainline 2010-09-15 Martin Jambor mjam...@suse.cz

[Bug 910363]

2012-01-10 Thread Jamborm
Author: jamborm Date: Mon Jan 9 19:52:06 2012 New Revision: 183029 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=183029 Log: 2012-01-09 Martin Jambor mjam...@suse.cz PR tree-optimization/51759 * g++.dg/ipa/pr51759.C: New test. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ipa

[Bug 910363]

2012-01-10 Thread Jamborm
Author: jamborm Date: Mon Jan 9 20:03:08 2012 New Revision: 183031 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=183031 Log: 2012-01-09 Martin Jambor mjam...@suse.cz PR tree-optimization/51759 * g++.dg/ipa/pr51759.C: New test. Added: branches/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc

[Bug 910363]

2012-01-10 Thread Jamborm
I have backported the fix to the 4.5 branch and also committed the testcase to the the 4.6 branch and trunk. Still it is a duplicate of PR 45644 and so I'm closing this as such. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 45644 *** -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 841825]

2011-09-07 Thread Jamborm
I have reverted the patch causing this on the 4.6 branch. As far as trunk is concerned, I'll track it in a duplicate of this bug, PR 50287. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 50287 *** -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1286343]

2014-03-27 Thread Jamborm
Fixed on 4.8 as well. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1286343 Title: mrpt triggers ICE on armf, powerpc, ppc64el at -O2 or higher To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1286343]

2014-03-27 Thread Jamborm
Author: jamborm Date: Wed Mar 26 13:47:46 2014 New Revision: 208844 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208844root=gccview=rev Log: 2014-03-26 Martin Jambor mjam...@suse.cz PR ipa/60419 * ipa.c (symtab_remove_unreachable_nodes): Clear thunk and alias flags of nodes

[Bug 1286343]

2014-03-27 Thread Jamborm
Author: jamborm Date: Fri Mar 21 12:48:02 2014 New Revision: 208747 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208747root=gccview=rev Log: 2014-03-21 Martin Jambor mjam...@suse.cz PR ipa/60419 * ipa.c (symtab_remove_unreachable_nodes): Clear thunk flag of nodes in the border

[Bug 1286343]

2014-03-20 Thread Jamborm
Trunk patch posted to the mailing list: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-03/msg01078.html 4.8 will need some slightly modified variant, I'm still looking for the best place to reset the flag there. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1286343]

2014-03-20 Thread Jamborm
Good job reducing the testcase to something this small! Anyway, Jakub's analysis of what is going on is still correct and all the high level decisions that we do are IMHO correct too. The invocation of symtab_remove_unreachable_symbols that removes the callers is called with before_inlining_p