Re: [Bug 1485370] [NEW] package linux-image-3.16.0-44-generic 3.16.0-44.59~14.04.1 failed to install/upgrade ...
Dionysis wrote on 2015-08-16 20:25: Public bug reported: Installing latest updates. I keep geting these errors ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04 Package: linux-image-3.16.0-44-generic 3.16.0-44.59~14.04.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.16.0-41.57~14.04.1-generic 3.16.7-ckt11 Uname: Linux 3.16.0-41-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3.11 Architecture: amd64 Date: Sun Aug 16 09:59:21 2015 DuplicateSignature: package:linux-image-3.16.0-44-generic:3.16.0-44.59~14.04.1:run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/zz-runlilo exited with return code 1 ErrorMessage: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/zz-runlilo exited with return code 1 InstallationDate: Installed on 2015-03-14 (155 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 14.04.2 LTS Trusty Tahr - Release amd64 (20150218.1) SourcePackage: lilo Title: package linux-image-3.16.0-44-generic 3.16.0-44.59~14.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/zz-runlilo exited with return code 1 UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) And what is the reason for this failure on your system? Is the config file of lilo empty? Or not filled? Or without image? And what is the type of boot partition and its filesystem? Or is it RAID? What type / version? Without any of this information nobody can help you and your system. --- Have a nice day. Joachim (Germany) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1485370 Title: package linux-image-3.16.0-44-generic 3.16.0-44.59~14.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/zz-runlilo exited with return code 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lilo/+bug/1485370/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1394248] package linux-image-3.16.0-25-generic 3.16.0-25.33 failed to install/upgrade ...
Hello Buddy, Buddy wrote on 2014-11-19 15:15: I am not a developer so I have not figured out a workaround for this problem. I have tried updates through the terminal and get errors there as well. I will probably be doing a rollback to a stable release eventually as I have too much learning to do to be able to fix this problem and not enough time to learn but was hoping at least passing this on to the developer community might help this new version become stable. Please: look at first into /etc/lilo.conf: is there a line boot= and a line root=? Then check the images at the end of this file. Are there images? And to which files the images will be linked? The next step could be: download and install the newest lilo package of Ubuntu (upstream version 24.1) which should solve many problems with liloconfig. Then try again liloconfig. Please give me feedback about your results. --- Have a nice day. Joachim (Germany) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1394248 Title: package linux-image-3.16.0-25-generic 3.16.0-25.33 failed to install/upgrade: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/zz-runlilo exited with return code 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lilo/+bug/1394248/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1374399] Re: package linux-image-3.13.0-36-generic 3.13.0-36.63~precise1 failed to install/upgrade ...
Hello Gustavo, Gustavo Luvizotto wrote on 2014-10-02 12:57: So, I have this image.. How can I set this for install manually? Thanks a lot for you concern. You need the following files for using with lilo: /boot/vmlinuz-3.13.0-35-generic /boot/initrd.img-3.13.0-35-generic /boot/System.map-3.13.0-35-generic The initrd.img should be created by mkinitramfs (inside initramfs-tools) and must exist. If you see all these files (with size 0) then try per hand to edit the /etc/lilo.conf at the end of the file and create/update these lines: image = /boot/vmlinuz-3.13.0-35-generic label = Linux read-only optional initrd = /boot/initrd.img-3.13.0-35-generic Then try to start lilo again. If lilo still fail, then the next question: which type is your partition of root directory (/). If it is a RAID than it could be difficulty running lilo and you need some more handwork. And then please check the lines with root= (with UUID) and also boot= (with HDD ID) in /etc/lilo.conf and check whether these lines are o.k. --- Have a nice day. Joachim (Germany) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1374399 Title: package linux-image-3.13.0-36-generic 3.13.0-36.63~precise1 failed to install/upgrade: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/zz-runlilo exited with return code 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lilo/+bug/1374399/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1374399] [NEW] package linux-image-3.13.0-36-generic 3.13.0-36.63~precise1 failed to install/upgrade ...
Hello! run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postinst.d/zz-runlilo 3.13.0-35-generic /boot/vmlinuz-3.13.0-35-generic Fatal: No images have been defined. Please try to find out, why no images couldn't be found. On standard installed systems usually it runs without errors. Only with your help I can fix this problem. --- Have a nice day. Joachim (Germany) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1374399 Title: package linux-image-3.13.0-36-generic 3.13.0-36.63~precise1 failed to install/upgrade: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/zz-runlilo exited with return code 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lilo/+bug/1374399/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1202943] [NEW] package lilo 1:23.2-4 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
nofallyaqoo wrote on 2013-07-19 06:19: Hello lovely developers... i were trying my best to install lilo boot-loader instead of grub2 and it didn't work, it crashed in send me HERE so i came to report this bug. my installation is... Xbuntu 13.04, my kernels is 3.8.0-26-generic, and my system is up-to-date, Please fix this bug because i want to try lilo just for seek of geek. And what is the reason of this bug? Without any more information I cannot help! What is the boot medium and the boot partition? Is it a raid or not? How looks the resulting lilo.conf? --- Have a nice day. Joachim (Germany) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1202943 Title: package lilo 1:23.2-4 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lilo/+bug/1202943/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1156494] Re: installer doesn't add initrd option in lilo.conf
morozovvs wrote on 2013-03-19 08:52: Reinstallation of lilo didn't solve a problem, so i've started manual editing of lilo.conf. Ubuntu 12.04 comes out a view weeks earlier then my patch to lilo. The current Debian version of lilo (23.2-4) has the bugfix for this problem. You can fix the bug with this small patch for liloconfig script: --- aa/usr/sbin/liloconfig 2011-04-09 17:08:01.0 +0200 +++ bb/usr/sbin/liloconfig 2012-04-15 10:18:15.936797140 +0200 @@ -456,7 +456,7 @@ my $nr2; # search for kernel image files - my @vmlinuz = readpipe(/bin/ls -t -1 /boot/vmlinuz-2* 2/dev/null); + my @vmlinuz = readpipe(/bin/ls -t -1 /boot/vmlinuz-* 2/dev/null); # append to new lilo.conf open(MYFH_NEW, $liloconfnew) or die Cannot open file: $!; You see: the old script working only for kernels beginning with 2* and couldn't find the newer 3* kernel versions. --- Have a nice day. Joachim (Germany) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1156494 Title: installer doesn't add initrd option in lilo.conf To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lilo/+bug/1156494/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1156494] [NEW] installer doesn't add initrd option in lilo.conf
Hello morozovvs, please show us your lilo.conf file (without comments) and a list of the important files in /boot directory (vmlinux*, initrd*), then we have a chance to find the problem. --- Have a nice day. Joachim (Germany) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1156494 Title: installer doesn't add initrd option in lilo.conf To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lilo/+bug/1156494/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1028113] run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/zz-runlilo exited with return code 1
Paul Necsoiu wrote on 2012-08-13 07:17: I can't upgrade to 3.2.0.27 kernel on a 64bit system. To enable use of kernels 3.x please patch this script: --- /usr/sbin/liloconfig2011-04-09 17:08:01.0 +0200 +++ /usr/sbin/liloconfig2012-04-15 10:18:15.936797140 +0200 @@ -456,7 +456,7 @@ my $nr2; # search for kernel image files - my @vmlinuz = readpipe(/bin/ls -t -1 /boot/vmlinuz-2* 2/dev/null); + my @vmlinuz = readpipe(/bin/ls -t -1 /boot/vmlinuz-* 2/dev/null); # append to new lilo.conf open(MYFH_NEW, $liloconfnew) or die Cannot open file: $!; Then restart liloconfig. --- Have a nice day. Joachim (Germany) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1028113 Title: package linux-image-3.2.0-27-generic 3.2.0-27.43 failed to install/upgrade: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/zz-runlilo exited with return code 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lilo/+bug/1028113/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1031770] /etc/kernel/postinst.d/zz-runlilo exited with return code 1
To enable use of kernels 3.x please patch this script: --- s16/scripts/liloconfig 2011-04-09 17:08:01.0 +0200 +++ s17/scripts/liloconfig 2012-04-15 10:18:15.936797140 +0200 @@ -456,7 +456,7 @@ my $nr2; # search for kernel image files - my @vmlinuz = readpipe(/bin/ls -t -1 /boot/vmlinuz-2* 2/dev/null); + my @vmlinuz = readpipe(/bin/ls -t -1 /boot/vmlinuz-* 2/dev/null); # append to new lilo.conf open(MYFH_NEW, $liloconfnew) or die Cannot open file: $!; Then restart liloconfig. --- Have a nice day. Joachim (Germany) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1031770 Title: package linux-image-3.2.0-29-generic 3.2.0-29.46 failed to install/upgrade: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/zz-runlilo exited with return code 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lilo/+bug/1031770/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1004919] Re: package linux-image-2.6.38-15-generic 2.6.38-15.59 failed to install/upgrade: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/zz-lilo exited with return code 1
Please read the warning of lilo while installing (DpkgTerminalLog.txt) and then decide by yourself what is to do. It seems you have a very special configuration, so you need a special solution. This is not a bug of lilo. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1004919 Title: package linux-image-2.6.38-15-generic 2.6.38-15.59 failed to install/upgrade: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/zz-lilo exited with return code 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lilo/+bug/1004919/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 990306] Re: package linux-image-3.2.0-24-generic-pae 3.2.0-24.37 failed to install/upgrade: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/zz-runlilo exited with return code 1
Now I know where the problem is: in liloconfig only vmlinuz-2* will be detected. With the newer version 23.2-4 of 15 Apr 2012 this bug is solved. Unfortunately this newer version isn't in ubuntu 1204. Please download this last version from the debian repository: http://cdn.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/lilo/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/990306 Title: package linux-image-3.2.0-24-generic-pae 3.2.0-24.37 failed to install/upgrade: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/zz-runlilo exited with return code 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lilo/+bug/990306/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 990306] package linux-image ... failed to install/upgrade ...
dustin marceau wrote on 2012-04-28 05:26: Fatal: No images have been defined. This means: no kernel images are configured in your /etc/lilo.conf. Usually this is a problem for your system! You can run 'liloconfig -f' to generate a new /etc/lilo.conf which should do its job. --- Have a nice day. Joachim (Germany) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/990306 Title: package linux-image-3.2.0-24-generic-pae 3.2.0-24.37 failed to install/upgrade: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/zz-runlilo exited with return code 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lilo/+bug/990306/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 934203] Re: --verify fails on renamed backups
here is the patch which also come with version 1.5-6 (see Debian Sid): diff -urN s05/backup2l s06/backup2l --- s05/backup2l2012-04-27 16:15:33.880477880 +0200 +++ s06/backup2l2012-04-27 20:45:23.736469131 +0200 @@ -404,7 +404,8 @@ fi done for CHK in $VOLNAME.$DST*.check ; do -sed s/ $VOLNAME.$SRC/ $VOLNAME.$DST/ $CHK $TMP.check +cat $CHK | sed s/ \.\/$VOLNAME.$SRC/ \.\/$VOLNAME.$DST/ |\ + sed s/ $VOLNAME.$SRC/ $VOLNAME.$DST/ $TMP.check mv $TMP.check $CHK done fi ** Changed in: backup2l (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/934203 Title: --verify fails on renamed backups To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/backup2l/+bug/934203/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 934203] Re: --verify fails on renamed backups
** Changed in: backup2l (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed ** Changed in: backup2l (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Joachim Wiedorn (ad-debian) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/934203 Title: --verify fails on renamed backups To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/backup2l/+bug/934203/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 982791] Re: package lilo 1:23.2-2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Usually the package script lilo.preinst should delete the file or symlink /boot/sarge.bmp. Please check your script /var/lib/dpkg/info/lilo.preinst. Workaround: delete this file/symlink /boot/sarge.bmp by hand. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/982791 Title: package lilo 1:23.2-2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lilo/+bug/982791/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 982791] Re: package lilo 1:23.2-2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Perhaps no clean installation? ** Changed in: lilo (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete ** Changed in: lilo (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Joachim Wiedorn (ad-debian) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/982791 Title: package lilo 1:23.2-2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lilo/+bug/982791/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 973903] Re: package linux-image-3.2.0-22-generic-pae 3.2.0-22.35 failed to install/upgrade: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/zz-runlilo exited with return code 1
The lilo.conf file is not configured completly. ** Changed in: lilo (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/973903 Title: package linux-image-3.2.0-22-generic-pae 3.2.0-22.35 failed to install/upgrade: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/zz-runlilo exited with return code 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lilo/+bug/973903/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 844859] Re: package linux-image-generic 2.6.38.11.26 failed to install/upgrade: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/zz-lilo exited with return code 1
logical partition is not allowed in this case? ** Changed in: lilo (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete ** Changed in: lilo (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Joachim Wiedorn (ad-debian) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/844859 Title: package linux-image-generic 2.6.38.11.26 failed to install/upgrade: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/zz-lilo exited with return code 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lilo/+bug/844859/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 774733] Re: package lilo 1:22.8-10ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: le sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 1
Fatal: No images have been defined. This will say that lilo cannot find any image definition in /etc/lilo.conf. Please configure your lilo.conf in the right way. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/774733 Title: package lilo 1:22.8-10ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: le sous- processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lilo/+bug/774733/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 774733] Re: package lilo 1:22.8-10ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: le sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 1
No images have been defined. ** Changed in: lilo (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete ** Changed in: lilo (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Joachim Wiedorn (ad-debian) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/774733 Title: package lilo 1:22.8-10ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: le sous- processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lilo/+bug/774733/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 703371] Re: package initramfs-tools 0.92bubuntu78 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
You have installed and configured lilo. But it seems your /etc/lilo.conf is misconfigured! AND you have installed and configured grub2 (grub-pc) which run without an error. The best way is to deinstall (purge) lilo! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/703371 Title: package initramfs-tools 0.92bubuntu78 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lilo/+bug/703371/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 703371] Re: package initramfs-tools 0.92bubuntu78 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
deinstall (purge) lilo! ** Changed in: lilo (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete ** Changed in: lilo (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Joachim Wiedorn (ad-debian) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/703371 Title: package initramfs-tools 0.92bubuntu78 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lilo/+bug/703371/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 973903] Re: package linux-image-3.2.0-22-generic-pae 3.2.0-22.35 failed to install/upgrade: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/zz-runlilo exited with return code 1
run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postinst.d/zz-runlilo 3.2.0-22-generic-pae /boot/vmlinuz-3.2.0-22-generic-pae Fatal: No images have been defined. This say where are YOUR problem. You haven't defined an image in /etc/lilo.conf. Please configure lilo.conf for your system and then run apt-get -f install. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/973903 Title: package linux-image-3.2.0-22-generic-pae 3.2.0-22.35 failed to install/upgrade: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/zz-runlilo exited with return code 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lilo/+bug/973903/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 973903] Re: package linux-image-3.2.0-22-generic-pae 3.2.0-22.35 failed to install/upgrade: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/zz-runlilo exited with return code 1
problem solved ** Changed in: lilo (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed ** Changed in: lilo (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Joachim Wiedorn (ad-debian) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/973903 Title: package linux-image-3.2.0-22-generic-pae 3.2.0-22.35 failed to install/upgrade: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/zz-runlilo exited with return code 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lilo/+bug/973903/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 909016] Re: log file syntax broken due to interpretation of certain encoded chars in urls
** Changed in: squidguard (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed ** Changed in: squidguard (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Joachim Wiedorn (ad-debian) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/909016 Title: log file syntax broken due to interpretation of certain encoded chars in urls To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/squidguard/+bug/909016/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 316816] Re: Segmentation fault at large expression lists
Problem is user specific - resolved. ** Changed in: squidguard (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed ** Changed in: squidguard (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Joachim Wiedorn (ad-debian) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/316816 Title: Segmentation fault at large expression lists To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/squidguard/+bug/316816/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 331070] Re: Full regular expressions support absent for URL rewriting
** Changed in: squidguard (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = Fix Released ** Changed in: squidguard (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Joachim Wiedorn (ad-debian) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/331070 Title: Full regular expressions support absent for URL rewriting To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/squidguard/+bug/331070/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 844859] Re: package linux-image-generic 2.6.38.11.26 failed to install/upgrade: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/zz-lilo exited with return code 1
| Warning: LBA32 addressing assumed | Fatal: Can't put the boot sector on logical partition 0x0805 | run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/zz-lilo exited with return code 1 This means lilo will be started and lilo found in /etc/lilo.conf a logical partition as device for boot sector. But in your special case it is not allowed. Please check your /etc/lilo.conf file. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/844859 Title: package linux-image-generic 2.6.38.11.26 failed to install/upgrade: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/zz-lilo exited with return code 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lilo/+bug/844859/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 822959] Re: gnome user guide update Issue
This was only a configuration problem. ** Changed in: lilo (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid ** Changed in: lilo (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = Fix Released ** Changed in: lilo (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Joachim Wiedorn (ad-debian) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/822959 Title: gnome user guide update Issue To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lilo/+bug/822959/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 335174] Re: Machines with 16 drives not supported
Bug were solved with lilo upstream version 23.2. Solved for Oneiric Ocelot version. ** Changed in: lilo (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = Fix Released ** Changed in: lilo (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Joachim Wiedorn (ad-debian) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/335174 Title: Machines with 16 drives not supported To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub/+bug/335174/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 822959] Re: gnome user guide update Issue
Hao Tang 822...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote on 2011-08-12 18:35: root@ubuntu:/etc# more /etc/lilo.conf # sample /etc/lilo.conf entry for memtest86 image = /boot/memtest86+.bin label = memtest86+ image = /boot/memtest86+.bin append = console=ttyS0,115200n8 label = memtest86+serial You use a length of 16 characters for the second image entry. But until now the maximal allowed length of labels is 15 character. Please trim your label to 15 characters. --- Have a nice day. Joachim (Germany) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/822959 Title: gnome user guide update Issue To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lilo/+bug/822959/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 822959] Re: gnome user guide update Issue
Please let us see your config snippet about images in lilo.conf. --- Have a nice day. Joachim (Germany) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/822959 Title: gnome user guide update Issue To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lilo/+bug/822959/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 644645] Re: Ubuntu default link option -Bsymbolic-functions breaks Xfe
** Changed in: xfe (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/644645 Title: Ubuntu default link option -Bsymbolic-functions breaks Xfe To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fox1.6/+bug/644645/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 358945] Re: The Graphic Interface (Xfe) crashes and come back to the log screen
** Changed in: xfe (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/358945 Title: The Graphic Interface (Xfe) crashes and come back to the log screen To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfe/+bug/358945/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 590788] Re: Lilo Failed to create initrd image for linux-image-2.6.32-22-generic
Why do you have splash in your lilo.conf? This option was experimental by OpenSuse but never supported from upstream. And as I know splash wasn't supported from Debian and Ubuntu. So please remove the splash option! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/590788 Title: Lilo Failed to create initrd image for linux-image-2.6.32-22-generic To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lilo/+bug/590788/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 590788] Re: Lilo Failed to create initrd image for linux-image-2.6.32-22-generic
should run without the unofficial option splash ** Changed in: lilo (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/590788 Title: Lilo Failed to create initrd image for linux-image-2.6.32-22-generic To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lilo/+bug/590788/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 563075] Re: package memtest86 4.00-2ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade:
it seems it was an invalid entry in the LILO.CONF file ** Changed in: lilo (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563075 Title: package memtest86 4.00-2ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lilo/+bug/563075/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 505485] Re: lilo fails to install in a chroot lacking /etc/mtab
This lilo version was beta (unfortunately) and cannot work with the newer UUID scheme. Please use 22.8-10 or better 23.2-1 for full support for UUIDs. ** Changed in: lilo (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/505485 Title: lilo fails to install in a chroot lacking /etc/mtab To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lilo/+bug/505485/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 703812] Re: missing ldap support in squidguard
** Changed in: squidguard (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/703812 Title: missing ldap support in squidguard To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/squidguard/+bug/703812/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 331070] Re: Full regular expressions support absent for URL rewriting
This bug is fixed since squidguard 1.4-1. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/331070 Title: Full regular expressions support absent for URL rewriting -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 703812] Re: missing ldap support in squidguard
With squidguard 1.4-3 comes OpenLDAP support and uses newer libdb4.8. Please use this newer version. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/703812 Title: missing ldap support in squidguard -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 757474] Re: squidGuard expressionlist not working in 10.04 LTS
This bug will not be fixed in the old version (1.2.0). But all versions of squidguard beginning with 1.3 have a bug fix. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/757474 Title: squidGuard expressionlist not working in 10.04 LTS -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 644645] Re: Ubuntu default link option -Bsymbolic-functions breaks Xfe
Ok, with version 1.32.3-1 (Debian) this problem is solved. So this bug can be closed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/644645 Title: Ubuntu default link option -Bsymbolic-functions breaks Xfe -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 778655] Re: Sync lilo 1:23.1-2 (main) from Debian unstable (main)
Stéphane Graber stgra...@stgraber.org wrote on 2011-05-06 17:49: Please sync lilo 1:23.1-2 (main) from Debian unstable (main) Explanation of the Ubuntu delta and why it can be dropped: According to http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=602824 the required Ubuntu-specific branding changes are now in Debian using the new debian/patches/vendor.series file to patch Ubuntu. You can wait a few days. Then the new version 23.2-1 comes out for Debian. This new version is needed for all kernels = 2.6.36. --- Have a nice day. Joachim (Germany) ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #602824 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=602824 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/778655 Title: Sync lilo 1:23.1-2 (main) from Debian unstable (main) -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 704234] Re: Merge lilo 1:22.8-10 (main) from Debian unstable (main)
Colin Watson cjwat...@canonical.com wrote on 2011-02-15 11:45: We're well after our Debian import freeze for this cycle. I'm not particularly keen on importing a significant new upstream version in advance of a Debian upload unless there's a compelling reason to do so; can it not wait for natty+1, when we would merge it in the normal course of events? Artur, I was going to sponsor your original merge from the top of this bug instead, but the patches you attached were for linux86, not lilo. Could you please attach the correct patches? Now the new Debian package lilo 23.1-1 is in sid/unstable! --- Have a nice day. Joachim (Germany) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/704234 Title: Merge lilo 1:22.8-10 (main) from Debian unstable (main) -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 704234] Re: Merge lilo 1:22.8-10 (main) from Debian unstable (main)
Artur Rona ari-tc...@ubuntu.com wrote on 2011-02-09 17:45: Joachim, Debian 6.0 has been released. What about upload lilo 23 to unstable? I still wait to Niels Thykier as sponsor. He wanted to finish his review in the next days. After this step I hope he will upload the package to Debian. --- Have a nice day. Joachim (Germany) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/704234 Title: Merge lilo 1:22.8-10 (main) from Debian unstable (main) -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 644645] Re: Ubuntu default link option -Bsymbolic-functions breaks Xfe
I will test it in short with xfe 1.32.2 and give you feeback. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/644645 Title: Ubuntu default link option -Bsymbolic-functions breaks Xfe -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 704234] Re: Merge lilo 1:22.8-10 (main) from Debian unstable (main)
Artur Rona ari-tc...@ubuntu.com wrote on 2011-01-25 15:56: When we could expect upload lilo 1:23.1-1 to Debian? Maybe you could do it in experimental? My sponsor will do the upload after Squeeze is released. The date for this release is set to the first February weekend: Message from Neil McGovern ne...@debian.org: Following on from above, we now have a target date of the weekend of 5th and 6th February for the release. We have checked with core teams, and this seems to be acceptable for everyone. Because of this short time to release I think the way via experimental is not needed. --- Have a nice day. Joachim (Germany) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/704234 Title: Merge lilo 1:22.8-10 (main) from Debian unstable (main) -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 704234] Re: Merge lilo 1:22.8-10 (main) from Debian unstable (main)
Artur Rona ari-tc...@ubuntu.com wrote on 2011-01-23 23:40: @Joachim, - for us the most important are Ubuntu-specific patches. if you can support them for us, we don't need other changes. The support is already inside of 23.1-1 which work with the file debian/patches/ubuntu.series and support in debuild. Here you can find the git repository: http://git.debian.org/?p=lilo/debian.git This package (first try) is already on mentors.debian.net and there is a threat with an review on http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2011/01/msg00361.html I have also get an review from Openwall maintainer with some patches, which still must be verified. I will update this 23.1-1 package because of the hints in reviews in the next days and then it should be ready for Debian and Ubuntu. --- Have a nice day. Joachim (Germany) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/704234 Title: Merge lilo 1:22.8-10 (main) from Debian unstable (main) -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 704234] Re: Merge lilo 1:22.8-10 (main) from Debian unstable (main)
Please notice, that a new Debian package 23.1-1 will follow in the next days. The development of this package will include the ubuntu specific patches. git repository (for debian package): http://git.debian.org/?p=lilo/debian.git Have a nice day. Joachim (Debian Maintainer of LILO) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/704234 Title: Merge lilo 1:22.8-10 (main) from Debian unstable (main) -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 260059] Re: lilo needs to warn if initrd is too large
With the new upstream version 23.1 this problem should be solved. Have a nice day. Joachim (Germany) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/260059 Title: lilo needs to warn if initrd is too large -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 691975] Re: package initramfs-tools 0.92bubuntu78 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Kevin Bandura 691...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote on 2010-12-20 18:14: Looks like it was a problem with lilo and grub both being installed, although I am using grub as the boot-loader. Not sure how to fix with both installed, but removing lilo allowed things to update. If this is the problem, then see the following thread in Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=606952 Have a nice day, Joachim (Germany) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/691975 Title: package initramfs-tools 0.92bubuntu78 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 691975] Re: package initramfs-tools 0.92bubuntu78 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #606952 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=606952 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/691975 Title: package initramfs-tools 0.92bubuntu78 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 669363] Re: Please merge lilo 1:22.8-8.3(main) from debian unstable(main)
Hello Sebastien, Sebastien Bacher seb...@ubuntu.com wrote on 2010-11-23 10:56: Is the git you are pointing there the official lilo one? Did you official become maintainer for lilo in Debian or does that need to be reviewed and approved before landing? The git of Lilo upstream is official, because I am the current developer of Lilo. The Debian/Ubuntu git is still inofficial - but up to date. On the other hand in the internet exists only a very old official CVS. How I have said some days ago there is a difficult situation in maintaining of Lilo in Debian. Here you can read more about this topic: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=587886 If the CTTE committee of Debian decide, that I may overtake the maintaining, then I am the new maintainer. Finally the new packages for Ubuntu can be uploaded to the official repository. Shouldn't we rather wait on a Debian upload and sync from it? We can wait, but I don't know how long we must wait: two weeks, two months ...? Perhaps to long for Lilo and for Ubuntu. The stable update rules usually allow only selected fixes for specific issues, it's not likely that this version would be allowed as such but backporting some of the patches might be possible. I would suggest So there apply similar rules as for Debian. Have a nice day, Joachim (Germany) ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #587886 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=587886 -- Please merge lilo 1:22.8-8.3(main) from debian unstable(main) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/669363 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 470502] Re: upgrade to karmic: could not install initramfs-tools - Fatal: raid_setup: stat(/dev/hda)
Please try the new package with LILO 23.1: http://lilo.alioth.debian.org/ftp/ubuntu These packages were made for Natty. If you cannot install them on Karmic you can try to compile it by yourself (with debuild ...) with the source package (same link). Have a nice day, Joachim (Germany) -- upgrade to karmic: could not install initramfs-tools - Fatal: raid_setup: stat(/dev/hda) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/470502 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 669363] Re: Please merge lilo ... from debian unstable / new lilo 23.1
Joachim Wiedorn 669...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote on 2010-11-17 22:31: Now I have worked the last week on an universal source package for Debian/Ubuntu. You can find my test packages here: http://lilo.alioth.debian.org/ftp/ There are new packages for Debian and Ubuntu, made with the same source package of LILO 23.1. It can be seen in the following git repository: http://git.debian.org/?p=lilo/debian.git;a=summary It can be downloaded for Ubuntu Natty (i386, amd86): http://lilo.alioth.debian.org/ftp/ubuntu/ and can be downloaded for Debian Squeeze (i386, amd64): http://lilo.alioth.debian.org/ftp/debian/ While working on these new packages I have analyzed all bugreports for LILO in Debian and Ubuntu. I have created many patches which can now be used to close 25 Debian bugreports and 5 Ubuntu bugreports. Finally the new packages for Ubuntu can be uploaded to the official repository. Would it be a good idea to make packages for Maverick, too? Which naming scheme would be the best? 23.1-1ubuntu1~maverick1 ? Have a nice day, Joachim (Germany) -- Please merge lilo 1:22.8-8.3(main) from debian unstable(main) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/669363 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 669363] Re: Please merge lilo 1:22.8-8.3(main) from debian unstable(main)
Joachim Wiedorn ad_deb...@joonet.de wrote on 2010-11-08 18:46: » which essentially states that applying patches can be easier with a » common source package and sebastien's idea also came from the below » article » »http://raphaelhertzog.com/2010/11/05/managing-distribution-specific-patches-with-a-common-source-package/ » » which requires only a source format change to 3.0(quilt) Thanks for this link. I will try to create a package in this way of Raphael Hertzog have written. Now I have worked the last week on an universal source package for Debian/Ubuntu. You can find my test packages here: http://lilo.alioth.debian.org/ftp/ It would be nice if someone will test it, too. Unfortunately the maintainer of Lilo in Debian seems to don't want do any work on this package anymore. But I hope we get a solution for this problem in the next weeks. Because there are a problem with Lilo maintaining in Debian: Perhaps it would be the better way to make the packages for Ubuntu directly above the Ubuntu Developer Team without waiting on Debian maintaining. Have a nice day, Joachim (Germany) -- Please merge lilo 1:22.8-8.3(main) from debian unstable(main) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/669363 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 669363] Re: Please merge lilo 1:22.8-8.3(main) from debian unstable(main)
Bhavani Shankar right2bh...@gmail.com wrote on 2010-11-08 15:57: Reported in debian and opened a bugwatch ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #602824 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=602824 | V » which essentially states that applying patches can be easier with a » common source package and sebastien's idea also came from the below » article » »http://raphaelhertzog.com/2010/11/05/managing-distribution-specific-patches-with-a-common-source-package/ » » which requires only a source format change to 3.0(quilt) Thanks for this link. I will try to create a package in this way of Raphael Hertzog have written. Unfortunately the maintainer of Lilo in Debian seems to don't want do any work on this package anymore. But I hope we get a solution for this problem in the next weeks. Have a nice day, Joachim (Germany) -- Please merge lilo 1:22.8-8.3(main) from debian unstable(main) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/669363 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
