Re: [Bug 373680] Re: network-manager fails periodically , on backgound networks scan?
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 8:11 PM, Mathieu Trudel mathieu...@gmail.com wrote: Great, assigning this to myself as yet another bug to consider for a possible SRU for Lucid. This still involves cherry-picking http://cgit.freedesktop.org/NetworkManager/NetworkManager/commit/?h=NM_0_8id=080ee1f2dbf0b55d63ec8629dbbd31f11aab52b9 and careful testing, so I'll first prepare a package. Marking as Triaged since there's an obvious fix. The real fix is not to disable scanning for a BSS once you are associated, if you disable scanning for a BSS then you won't be able to roam in a corporate environment. You want to roam to be able to make a smooth transition from one AP to another on the same ESS. We allow for this in mac80211 and the proposed solution on this thread is no fix at all, its only something that should be considered if you are certain the AP is singular. If the AP is singular then sure, it makes no sense to scan and not sure if this is something that should be specified as a toggle when configuring wireless settings for the first time or if wpa_supplicant should pick this up on its own. Most Linux distributions today use Network Manager and do a background scan every 60 seconds when you are associated. It does this to feed to wpa_supplicant new data from the BSSes around you so wpa_supplicant can roam if it finds you are closer to another BSS with a better signal. Network Manager should not be triggering a scan every 60 seconds, instead it should be triggering a scan if the current BSS has hit an RSSI for the BSS below a certain threshold or a large specific period of time has elapsed. The kernel and wpa_supplicant has support for this now, look at using the bgscan module on wpa_supplicant. This needs to be addressed in Network Manager. Linux distributions would also need to switch to using nl80211, the new event (RSSI going below a certain threshold) is only available using nl80211. Using nl80211 is what should be used today. For an example of a Linux distribution doing the right thing with regards to background scanning you can look at ChromeOS, it uses a fork of conmann they made, flimflam, flimflam uses the bgscan module. Luis -- network-manager fails periodically , on backgound networks scan? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/373680 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 373680] Re: network-manager fails periodically , on backgound networks scan?
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez mcg...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 8:11 PM, Mathieu Trudel mathieu...@gmail.com wrote: Great, assigning this to myself as yet another bug to consider for a possible SRU for Lucid. This still involves cherry-picking http://cgit.freedesktop.org/NetworkManager/NetworkManager/commit/?h=NM_0_8id=080ee1f2dbf0b55d63ec8629dbbd31f11aab52b9 and careful testing, so I'll first prepare a package. Marking as Triaged since there's an obvious fix. The real fix is not to disable scanning for a BSS once you are associated, if you disable scanning for a BSS then you won't be able to roam in a corporate environment. You want to roam to be able to make a smooth transition from one AP to another on the same ESS. We allow for this in mac80211 and the proposed solution on this thread is no fix at all, its only something that should be considered if you are certain the AP is singular. If the AP is singular then sure, it makes no sense to scan and not sure if this is something that should be specified as a toggle when configuring wireless settings for the first time or if wpa_supplicant should pick this up on its own. Most Linux distributions today use Network Manager and do a background scan every 60 seconds when you are associated. It does this to feed to wpa_supplicant new data from the BSSes around you so wpa_supplicant can roam if it finds you are closer to another BSS with a better signal. Network Manager should not be triggering a scan every 60 seconds, instead it should be triggering a scan if the current BSS has hit an RSSI for the BSS below a certain threshold or a large specific period of time has elapsed. The kernel and wpa_supplicant has support for this now, look at using the bgscan module on wpa_supplicant. This needs to be addressed in Network Manager. Linux distributions would also need to switch to using nl80211, the new event (RSSI going below a certain threshold) is only available using nl80211. Using nl80211 is what should be used today. For an example of a Linux distribution doing the right thing with regards to background scanning you can look at ChromeOS, it uses a fork of conmann they made, flimflam, flimflam uses the bgscan module. Also, consider that if you disable scanning the scan list will be old anyway, so even if your AP is singular you may want to scan, but definitely I agree it should not be every 60 seconds. How often? Not sure, this should be taken up on the linux-wireless mailing list. Luis -- network-manager fails periodically , on backgound networks scan? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/373680 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 373680] Re: network-manager fails periodically , on backgound networks scan?
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 2:14 PM, Jeremy Visser jer...@visser.name wrote: Luis R. Rodriguez said: The real fix is not to disable scanning for a BSS once you are associated, if you disable scanning for a BSS then you won't be able to roam in a corporate environment. If I hardcode the BSSID in, how am I going to roam anyway? You should re-read my posts, be sure to read about the sections I note about a singular AP. Luis -- network-manager fails periodically , on backgound networks scan? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/373680 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 615300] Re: Enable default Evolution signature as Sent from Ubuntu
WTF no -- Enable default Evolution signature as Sent from Ubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/615300 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 407040] Re: ath9k - crashes and unable to reinsert module. Hardware won't reset.
Feel free to test these patches out: http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/mcgrof/patches/ath9k/2010/09 /PS-fixes-09-04/ They will be sent upstream and propagated upstream. -- ath9k - crashes and unable to reinsert module. Hardware won't reset. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407040 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 379096] Re: Ath9k: Signal drops to 0% on connection to AP after a few seconds, drops connection.
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 9:16 AM, lucas luky lucas_arrr...@hotmail.com wrote: Same problem on ASPIRE 4736Z. Most of the times the connection is fine. But sometimes (after closing the lid or wifi router is far away) it is very unpredictable, connecting and disconnecting, re-asking me for password... When I reboot it works fine again. ~$ uname --all Linux luky-laptop 2.6.31-21-generic #59-Ubuntu SMP Wed Mar 24 07:28:56 UTC 2010 i686 GNU/Linux ~$ lsmod|grep ath ath9k 258744 0 mac80211 181140 1 ath9k ath 8060 1 ath9k cfg80211 93052 3 ath9k,mac80211,ath led_class 4096 1 ath9k 2.6.31 is old and deprecated, please try a stable kernel or just install a stable compat-wireless: http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Download/stable Luis -- Ath9k: Signal drops to 0% on connection to AP after a few seconds, drops connection. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/379096 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 289356] Re: ath9k causes system lockup
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 5:32 AM, whwi whitewin...@gmail.com wrote: [ 24.234236] phy0: Atheros AR5418 MAC/BB Rev:2 AR5133 RF Rev:81 mem=0xc9000470, irq=17 Please do this: sudo rm -rf /lib/modules/$(uname -r)/updates/ sudo depmod -a Then try out the compat-wireless-2.6.34 tarball: http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Download/stable Luis -- ath9k causes system lockup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/289356 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 289356] Re: ath9k causes system lockup
What hardware ? I'm looking for lines like this one on the dmesg log: phy8: Atheros AR9300 Rev:2 mem=0xc900193c, irq=17 Luis -- ath9k causes system lockup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/289356 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 373680] Re: network-manager fails periodically , on backgound networks scan?
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 8:05 AM, Julien Couret julien.cou...@gmail.com wrote: Same problem here on a brand new lucid lynx : ping raises every 2 minutes when using wireless. System info : 2.6.32-21-generic #32-Ubuntu SMP Fri Apr 16 08:09:38 UTC 2010 x86_64 GNU/Linux 0b:00.0 Network controller: Intel Corporation PRO/Wireless 4965 AG or AGN [Kedron] Network Connection (rev 61) cfg80211 148386 3 iwlagn,iwlcore,mac80211 Wagner, could you please release a lucid package including your patch ? Lucid uses 2.6.32 and the background scanning which I described earlier is part of 2.6.32 so you should be OK on Lucid. $ git describe --contains 142b9f5074dc0d09dc0025739ad437723d7bf527 v2.6.32-rc1~703^2~506^2~36 I would not recommend disabling scanning unless you let the user save that as a preference as otherwise you would not be able to pick APs while you move around. Eventually the supplicant will get roaming support and you will need bg scans for this. Luis -- network-manager fails periodically , on backgound networks scan? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/373680 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 356768] Re: ath5k driver hangs periodically, please include trivial patch in kernel
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 7:43 PM, shamwow sh4m@gmail.com wrote: Okay I think applying Bob's patch and recompiling ath5k kernel module solved my system stability problem. No lockups (kernel panics) since I changed to the custom module. Someone needs to add this to the mainline linux kernel release, this is ridiculous that Ubuntu Karmic Koala 9.10 is shipping without sanity checks on ath5k failwh...@failwhale-desktop:~$ uptime 22:39:04 up 1 day, 8:27, 2 users, load average: 0.87, 1.14, 1.70 failwh...@failwhale-desktop:~$ Ubuntu 9.10 uses a kernel that is deprecated, the 2.6.31 kernel no longer gets stable updates. Luis -- ath5k driver hangs periodically, please include trivial patch in kernel https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/356768 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 373680] Re: network-manager fails periodically , on backgound networks scan?
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 2:42 AM, HaZeX ki...@hotmail.com wrote: Luis R, i dont agree with your words: this bug report should be closed as its for an older kernel and in older kernels this is just the way this works. If you want to take advantage of bg scanning enhancements it is outside the scope of the older kernels Im using the latest official ubuntu release and is still affeceted by this bug. The only 3 workarrounds i have found: Use Wagner Volanin patch for Network-manager or Remove network-manager and connect manually to the networks. or Using an alternative software like WICD to manage the networks. I hope it can be solve in the next release of Ubuntu, tell me if i can help testing something to solve the bug. You missed my point, the point was that background scans do go off channel for however long it takes a card to scan all the channels it supports. This doesn't affect only ath9k, it affects all cards and the proper solution would be to do a scan on each channel and then go back to the home channel for a while. Do this until you've completed the entire scan. This is addressed in a later kernel and therefore since the change is considerably large such a change cannot go into the stable kernel that Ubuntu ships. I encourage you to try to become familiar with the upstream kernel bug propagation life cycle so you can better understand how real critical fixes get merged into the Linux kernel stable releases and how implementation changes (like this one) won't go into stable release but instead into a next kernel release. http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Documentation/Fix_Propagation There are indeed some mixing fixes for ath9k on 2.6.31 though, see: http://bombadil.infradead.org/~mcgrof/patches/ath9k/fixes-not-in-2.6.31 -for-ath9k.txt these unfortunately did not get propagated into the 2.6.31.y stable releases yet, but must be handled on a case by case basis. But since each release for Ubuntu is made every 6 months and since 9.10 release is not a long term support release you are likely better off just installing something like linux-backport-modules to get the 2.6.32 wireless subsystem to cure your fixes for now. I am not sure but lets say all ath9k 2.6.31 fixes eventually get merged into the next 2.6.31.y, it may or may not mean Ubuntu 9.10's 2.6.31 latest kernel will get those updates, depends likely on the severity and the kernel package policy for Ubuntu. Hope this better helps understand what I meant. Luis -- network-manager fails periodically , on backgound networks scan? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/373680 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 378156] Re: UNR Ath9K unstable connection
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 2:35 AM, Plippo mai...@philmerk.de wrote: I can confirm that with current compat-wireless (I use the release of Nov 25th) I have a stable, fast connection and also a higher connection strength. Streaming video works again. I suggest updating the backports- modules soon. lbm is based on the stable compat-wireless releases, if you use bleeding edge that is only supported if you are using the truly latest bleeding edge (as of today) and through the linux-wireless mailing list. Can someone please close this bug report. Luis -- UNR Ath9K unstable connection https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/378156 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 378156] Re: UNR Ath9K unstable connection
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 2:07 PM, Tim Gardner tim.gard...@canonical.com wrote: Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Jason Toffaletti ja...@subterrific.net wrote: Not solved for me. ii linux-image-2.6.31-14-generic 2.6.31-14.48 ii linux-backports-modules-karmic-generic 2.6.31.14.27 Tim, is this the package that provides the 2.6.32-rc5 stable compat-wireless stuff? Or is it likely that has not yet trickled down to regular packages (it might just be in proposed right now). Luis The last Karmic LBM release was based on -rc4: UBUNTU: Update to stable compat-wireless-2.6.32-rc4 Thanks TIm, when you do dpkg -l on it should it be: ii linux-backports-modules-karmic-generic2.6.31.14.27 Or something a little different? Luis -- UNR Ath9K unstable connection https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/378156 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 378156] Re: UNR Ath9K unstable connection
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Jason Toffaletti ja...@subterrific.net wrote: Not solved for me. ii linux-image-2.6.31-14-generic 2.6.31-14.48 ii linux-backports-modules-karmic-generic 2.6.31.14.27 Tim, is this the package that provides the 2.6.32-rc5 stable compat-wireless stuff? Or is it likely that has not yet trickled down to regular packages (it might just be in proposed right now). Luis -- UNR Ath9K unstable connection https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/378156 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 270748] Re: ath9k wireless not working with AR9280
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 2:35 AM, glass.dimly jmj...@riseup.net wrote: I can confirm this problem for Karmic 9.10. My wifi is at 50% when right by the router (dual boot wifi in windows is much more powerful). The signal drops and reloads when in the same room as the router. I've got a Asus EEE 1005HAB BLU001X, wifi card AR9285 Can you try lbm or compat-wireless-2.6.32-rc5.tar.bz2: http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Download/stable Luis -- ath9k wireless not working with AR9280 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/270748 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 378156] Re: UNR Ath9K unstable connection
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 5:19 PM, 1000HEUSER dun...@duncanhong.com wrote: I'm just hoping that 9.10 fixes it, I don't really want to buy another version of windows, well at least not on the netbook, I use it on the desktop and laptop. This is pretty frustrating, thankfully I don't use my netbook everyday so it's not the end of the world. Can you guys try out the latest stable compat-wireless release? http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Download/stable/ Luis -- UNR Ath9K unstable connection https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/378156 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 333730] Re: Wireless connection with ath9k is very unstable
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 9:45 AM, Christian Stövekenlaunchpad@excogitation.de wrote: afaict this issue still persists with the latest kernel on Karmic (2.6.31-3) as on Jaunty (2.6.28-15) with my AR928X [168c:002a] (rev 01) - (Vaio VGN-P11Z) What issue? I reviewed the bug report and determined it was horribly vague. Please read: http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Documentation/Reporting_bugs Luis -- Wireless connection with ath9k is very unstable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/333730 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 333730] Re: Wireless connection with ath9k is very unstable
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Christian Stövekenlaunchpad@excogitation.de wrote: The wireless connection becomes unusable after some time (without installing linux-backports-modules-jaunty-generic). Also connecting or reconnecting to the network does take too long. (way longer than other cards I use). I think (in contrast to Romuald) that constant traffic like pinging some box does not change the situation. If you tell me what logs (...) you need to help pinpoint the problem I'll be glad to provide those to you. Please read this: http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Documentation/Reporting_bugs#When_will_your_kernel_issue_be_fixed_.3F Notice I now put a section there. I wrote this just for you actually. Please tell me if this gives you enough explanation why you may see the issue fixed on linux-backports-modules-jaunty-generic but not on your distribution default kernel. If it is not clear please tell me what is not clear. Luis -- Wireless connection with ath9k is very unstable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/333730 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 333730] Re: Wireless connection with ath9k is very unstable
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Christian Stövekenlaunchpad@excogitation.de wrote: Ok so if there's a backport module fixing the issue then it should be fixed with some later kernel? But as I wrote the issue persists with Karmic - so does that mean there's a regression? I'm not that much into the inner workings of how Ubuntu gets developed / how bugs are fixed, so should I (many others) just refrain from reporting bugs? No -- you should always report bugs, but to report bugs more efficiently you should have better understanding how how upstream works. That's what I'm trying to coach you here on. If your issues is not a oops, of security fix, or a regression (very unlikely) chances are your issue is considered minor and although very important for us developer to fix -- you will never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never,
Re: [Bug 333730] Re: Wireless connection with ath9k is very unstable
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Christian Stövekenlaunchpad@excogitation.de wrote: So now for this bug - how do we go about it? This issue will never be fixed on the stable kernel of your distribution, your only option is to upgrade to bleeding edge compat-wireless or stable compat-wireless. Ubuntu has compat-wireless in the linux-backports package as well but that only gets updated whever Tim gets a chance to push it out, as I understand it. In the future it may make sense to carry stable compat-wireless on distributions, so for example when 2.6.32-rc1 goes out you can test that immediately. For now stick to testing in this order: 1) Ubuntu linux-backports module package 2) Compat-wireless stable 3) Compat-wireless bleeding edge Luis -- Wireless connection with ath9k is very unstable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/333730 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 373680] Re: network-manager fails periodically , on backgound networks scan?
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 1:09 PM, Wagner Volaninubuntu-li...@volanin.com.br wrote: I agree Luis, this is really not the right way to do it. The patch is just a workaround. Although I am already using ath9k from compat-wireless-2009-07-18, and the problem persists. Pehaps the right way would also be to only perform a network scan when the network is idle. But that is beyond my patching capabilities. ;-) I should mention the scan patches were merged onto wireless-testing. You may want to try the latest compat-wireless: http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Download/ You can also now use scripts/driver-select to pick only the driver you need. Luis -- network-manager fails periodically , on backgound networks scan? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/373680 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 373680] Re: network-manager fails periodically , on backgound networks scan?
this bug report should be closed as its for an older kernel and in older kernels this is just the way this works. If you want to take advantage of bg scanning enhancements it is outside the scope of the older kernels, and you *can* use newer kernels/drivers if you so choose. If you see issues with that then it is not an issue for a relevant bug report to launchpad or anything like that. Since you would be using bleeding edge if you see issues with the new scan method you can just explain the issues you see on linux-wireless. Luis On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Bug Watch Updaterbugwa...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: ** Changed in: network-manager (Fedora) Status: Unknown = Confirmed -- network-manager fails periodically , on backgound networks scan? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/373680 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- network-manager fails periodically , on backgound networks scan? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/373680 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 315056] Re: [jaunty] remove madwifi driver
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 4:33 PM, Orion6596lorenzo6...@gmail.com wrote: Alright i have been reading, and reading over this issue is there anyone that can post step by step instructions to get this resolved? im still new to linux and im having the exact same issues :( What is your issue? To get the latest ath5k read: http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Download/ MadWifi is old and should be avoided. Luis -- [jaunty] remove madwifi driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/315056 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 333730] Re: Wireless connection with ath9k is very unstable
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 7:07 PM, BarrettWilliamsba...@aol.com wrote: This error is not fixed in newer kernels such as 2.6.31-3 generic on Karmic Koala Alpha 3 x64. Your bug report is too vague, you may want to use the ath9k-devel mailing list [1] to describe your issues and also be sure to read the reporting bug guidelines for Linux wireless [2]. [1] https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel [2] http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Documentation/Reporting_bugs Luis -- Wireless connection with ath9k is very unstable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/333730 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 373680] Re: network-manager fails periodically , on backgound networks scan?
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 7:53 PM, HaZeXki...@hotmail.com wrote: Thanks for the patch, it's working fine for me. I've just installed the compiled package. This workaround is going to be really usefull for me. Thanks again! That will break roaming capabilities. The right way to solve this is to spread out scanning evenly and going back to the home channel after a few channel scans during a wide scan. Such work is being done upstream but it'll take while for users to get it unless using something like compat-wireless. Such patches are not yet merged by may soon be. Luis -- network-manager fails periodically , on backgound networks scan? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/373680 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 373680] Re: network-manager fails periodically , on backgound networks scan?
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 1:09 PM, Wagner Volaninubuntu-li...@volanin.com.br wrote: I agree Luis, this is really not the right way to do it. The patch is just a workaround. Although I am already using ath9k from compat-wireless-2009-07-18, and the problem persists. Pehaps the right way would also be to only perform a network scan when the network is idle. But that is beyond my patching capabilities. ;-) To help resolve this please consider testing these patches: http://marc.info/?l=linux-wirelessm=124773508125767w=2 Luis -- network-manager fails periodically , on backgound networks scan? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/373680 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 378156] Re: UNR Ath9K unstable connection
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 6:32 AM, gotobugme...@mailinator.com wrote: do something ! Huh? -- UNR Ath9K unstable connection https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/378156 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 319378] Re: [ath9k] Kernel panic in 2.6.27-11
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 2:28 AM, Bryan Wucoolo...@kernel.org wrote: Is this bug fixed or not? @Luis, Thanks for your upstream patch, do you think it is ok for us to cherry pick it to our Jaunty Stable Release Updates. This should already be part of jaunty, I made sure to inform the Ubuntu kernel team of the importance of the serialization patches. On the ath9k wiki we also keep track of known issues and the kernels when they were fixed. Let me paste the relevant section here: http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Drivers/ath9k Hangs with PCI devices and SMP systems This issue was due to a hardware limitation on our PCI devices whereby our device's FIFO queue got filled up and caused a loop. This issue is only present on our 11n PCI devices, its not present on our PCI-express devices nor our legacy 802.11abg devices. The fix was to serialize read/writes – a spin_lock around each read and write. This fix is not performed for PCI devices or non-SMP systems. This fix is present in 2.6.29, 2.6.28.10 and 2.6.27.22. In the future just please refer to the wiki page. Luis -- [ath9k] Kernel panic in 2.6.27-11 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/319378 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 319378] Re: [ath9k] Kernel panic in 2.6.27-11
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 12:43 PM, maxauthoritystubenschr...@vimperator.org wrote: With default ubuntu 9.04 I still had hangs, Did you read the wiki? 9.04 will ship with a default kernel, that will never get updated. To get the newer stable release kernels you have no other option but to upgrade the stable kernel. Jaunty should have these updated. Keep in mind stable kernels don't automatically trickle down to the default repository on Ubunut, they first hit the proposed repository and then eventually hit the main repository. For details please read: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam/LinuxWireless when upgrading to backport- modules (which basically is compat-wireless from end of March) they went away. Upgrading to a stable kernel should fix it too. Luis -- [ath9k] Kernel panic in 2.6.27-11 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/319378 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 378156] Re: UNR Ath9K unstable connection
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 12:31 PM, petrockgnuosph...@gmail.com wrote: I tried backports and it fixes the problem with the connection sometimes taking multiple tries and the problem of the connection just dropping for no apparent reason. However, the signal strength problem remains A patch has been posted for this, it hasn't yet been merged into wireless-testing though. . I helped a friend by an EeePC because my 1000 works well. But his is a 1000HE and uses different wireless hardware. So why are you reporting this on the same bug report? Unless someone can tell us that we are missing a setting and this really isn't a bug, we are returning the ASUS netbook and going shopping for a different model in the next couple days. Right now we are looking hard at the MSI Wind netbook and Acer Aspire One models. You need to provide more details in order to allow developer help you. Pleas read: http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Documentation/Reporting_bugs Luis -- UNR Ath9K unstable connection https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/378156 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 319378] Re: [ath9k] Kernel panic in 2.6.27-11
Can this be closed? -- [ath9k] Kernel panic in 2.6.27-11 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/319378 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 301822] Re: ath9k drops connection
Can you please try a new lbm or compat-wireless directly: http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Download Keep in mind if you have lbm installed you will need to remove it before trying compat-wireless as you would then end up with two modules competing for the same device. -- ath9k drops connection https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301822 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 285857] Re: ath9k can't connect to networks
need user info, also 2.6.27 is ancient for ath9k. Can you please try a newer kernel? Please see: http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Download -- ath9k can't connect to networks https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/285857 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 270748] Re: ath9k wireless not working with AR9280
Need user feedback on new 2.6.27 kernel image... Also 2.6.27 is old, please try a newer kernel. -- ath9k wireless not working with AR9280 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/270748 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 354548] Re: Atheros AR5008 ath9k cannot connect to WPA
Issue is fixed in lbm, please close. -- Atheros AR5008 ath9k cannot connect to WPA https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354548 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 333730] Re: Wireless connection with ath9k is very unstable
Bugs tend to be fixed in newer kernels, if you cannot test them from upstream sources then you have no other option but to wait until your distribution catches up with either a stable kernel release update or the next distribution release. A stable release upgrade would be from say, 2.6.27.1 to 2.6.27.2 and so on. A distribution upgrade would be from say Intrepid to Jaunty, and now karmic. To help with users not having to upgrade their kernels to try the latest bleeding edge wireless drivers we have put together a package called compat-wireless. Please try this: http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Download -- Wireless connection with ath9k is very unstable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/333730 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 325195] Re: wireless connection is being dropped - ath9k
need user info. Please try http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Download -- wireless connection is being dropped - ath9k https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/325195 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 324213] Re: [ath9k] AR928X fails to reconnect to WEP/WPA network after suspend/resume
Need user info. -- [ath9k] AR928X fails to reconnect to WEP/WPA network after suspend/resume https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/324213 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 360249] Re: Ath9k driver acting abnormaly on Jaunty
This bug lacks kernel information. Also please try linux-backport- modules or compat-wireless directly: http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Download -- Ath9k driver acting abnormaly on Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/360249 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 361178] Re: WiFi unable to reconnect after suspend; AR5008 + ath9k
Please close, this was fixed in lbm. -- WiFi unable to reconnect after suspend; AR5008 + ath9k https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/361178 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 362088] Re: ath9k passes no data after suspend
Please report back after testing lbm. Please close this bug then, suspend support was also not added into mac80211 until recently so lbm should have this. -- ath9k passes no data after suspend https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/362088 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 362985] Re: MacBook Pro 3.1 Very Weak Wireless Performance Using Jaunty (Intrepid Works Fine)
I'm not sure what your issue is with lbm, but if you have issues with it can you just try compat-wireless directly: http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Download -- MacBook Pro 3.1 Very Weak Wireless Performance Using Jaunty (Intrepid Works Fine) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/362985 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 364333] Re: ath9k crashes machine when joining wireless network
This can be closed. -- ath9k crashes machine when joining wireless network https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/364333 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 378156] Re: UNR Ath9K unstable connection
Can you please try lbm (linux-backport-modules) or compat-wireless: http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Download -- UNR Ath9K unstable connection https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/378156 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 379861] Re: Very weak signal using ath9k compared to Windows driver on same machine
A patch is available to test, please try it: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12930 This is not merged upstream yet so you will have to use wireless-testing directly. If you don't know what I am talking about then perhaps just try linux-backports-modules directly or compat-wireless: http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Download ** Bug watch added: Linux Kernel Bug Tracker #12930 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12930 -- Very weak signal using ath9k compared to Windows driver on same machine https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/379861 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 373680] Re: network-manager fails periodically , on backgound networks scan?
Please try lbm (linux-backport-mdules) or compat-wireless: http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Download -- network-manager fails periodically , on backgound networks scan? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/373680 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 362985] Re: MacBook Pro 3.1 Very Weak Wireless Performance Using Jaunty (Intrepid Works Fine)
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Alex alexanderl...@gmail.com wrote: In this case, lbm resolves the issues while compat-wireless does not. Strange but true. Huh? Keep in mind if you use compat-wireless and have lbm installed lbm might be picked up first. It depends on /etc/depmod.d/* files. If updates is first than where the ath9k from lbm comes in then updates will be prefered otherwise lbm will be picked. Also keep in mind lbm uses compat-wireless. Luis -- MacBook Pro 3.1 Very Weak Wireless Performance Using Jaunty (Intrepid Works Fine) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/362985 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 362088] Re: ath9k passes no data after suspend
Great, please close. -- ath9k passes no data after suspend https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/362088 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 362088] Re: ath9k passes no data after suspend
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Nathan Salwen salwe...@gmail.com wrote: Mine has been working since 9.04 and backported drivers package. I thought the emails at the time indicated that. Great please close the bug then. Luis -- ath9k passes no data after suspend https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/362088 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 362985] Re: MacBook Pro 3.1 Very Weak Wireless Performance Using Jaunty (Intrepid Works Fine)
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Alex alexanderl...@gmail.com wrote: Sorry, that could have been more clear. My first instinct was to build compat-wireless (from linuxwireless.org) in attempt to resolve the aforementioned problem. Unfortunately, compat-wireless itself did not help at all, so I uninstalled it and then installed lbm, which did indeed fix it. Then in that case lbm hasn't yet been updated to reflect new compat-wireless changes. Luis -- MacBook Pro 3.1 Very Weak Wireless Performance Using Jaunty (Intrepid Works Fine) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/362985 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 289356] Re: ath9k causes system lockup
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 12:40 AM, Nikunj Mehta p...@paradox924x.com wrote: This is a Toshiba Qosmio G55-Q802. uname -a: Linux Paradox924X 2.6.28-12-generic #43-Ubuntu SMP Fri May 1 19:31:32 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux lspci -vv: --snip-- 02:00.0 Network controller: Atheros Communications Inc. AR928X Wireless Network Adapter (PCI-Express) (rev 01) Subsystem: Askey Computer Corp. Device 7141 Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx- Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast TAbort- TAbort- MAbort- SERR- PERR- INTx- Latency: 0, Cache Line Size: 32 bytes Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 16 Region 0: Memory at ff9f (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=64K] Capabilities: [40] Power Management version 2 Flags: PMEClk- DSI- D1+ D2- AuxCurrent=375mA PME(D0+,D1+,D2-,D3hot+,D3cold-) Status: D0 PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME- Capabilities: [50] Message Signalled Interrupts: Mask- 64bit- Queue=0/0 Enable- Address: Data: Capabilities: [60] Express (v1) Legacy Endpoint, MSI 00 DevCap: MaxPayload 128 bytes, PhantFunc 0, Latency L0s 512ns, L1 64us ExtTag- AttnBtn- AttnInd- PwrInd- RBE- FLReset- DevCtl: Report errors: Correctable- Non-Fatal- Fatal- Unsupported- RlxdOrd+ ExtTag- PhantFunc- AuxPwr- NoSnoop- MaxPayload 128 bytes, MaxReadReq 512 bytes DevSta: CorrErr- UncorrErr+ FatalErr- UnsuppReq+ AuxPwr- TransPend- LnkCap: Port #0, Speed 2.5GT/s, Width x1, ASPM unknown, Latency L0 512ns, L1 64us ClockPM- Suprise- LLActRep- BwNot- LnkCtl: ASPM L1 Enabled; RCB 128 bytes Disabled- Retrain- CommClk+ ExtSynch- ClockPM- AutWidDis- BWInt- AutBWInt- LnkSta: Speed 2.5GT/s, Width x1, TrErr- Train- SlotClk+ DLActive- BWMgmt- ABWMgmt- Capabilities: [90] MSI-X: Enable- Mask- TabSize=1 Vector table: BAR=0 offset= PBA: BAR=0 offset= Capabilities: [100] Advanced Error Reporting ? Capabilities: [140] Virtual Channel ? Capabilities: [160] Device Serial Number 00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00 Kernel driver in use: ath9k Kernel modules: ath9k --snip-- syslog (This happens once per minute): --snip-- May 10 07:58:54 Paradox924X kernel: [60086.494473] ath_set_channel: unable to reset channel 1 (2412Mhz) flags 0x300e2 hal status 4294967291 May 10 07:58:54 Paradox924X kernel: [60086.494574] ath9k_config: Unable to set channel May 10 07:58:54 Paradox924X kernel: [60086.918644] ath_set_channel: unable to reset channel 2 (2417Mhz) flags 0x300e2 hal status 4294967291 May 10 07:58:54 Paradox924X kernel: [60086.918782] ath9k_config: Unable to set channel May 10 07:58:55 Paradox924X kernel: [60087.340636] ath_set_channel: unable to reset channel 3 (2422Mhz) flags 0x300e2 hal status 4294967291 May 10 07:58:55 Paradox924X kernel: [60087.340801] ath9k_config: Unable to set channel May 10 07:58:55 Paradox924X kernel: [60087.755014] ath_set_channel: unable to reset channel 4 (2427Mhz) flags 0x300e2 hal status 4294967291 May 10 07:58:55 Paradox924X kernel: [60087.755183] ath9k_config: Unable to set channel May 10 07:58:55 Paradox924X kernel: [60088.050646] ath_set_channel: unable to reset channel 5 (2432Mhz) flags 0x700e2 hal status 4294967291 May 10 07:58:55 Paradox924X kernel: [60088.050770] ath9k_config: Unable to set channel May 10 07:58:56 Paradox924X kernel: [60088.466621] ath_set_channel: unable to reset channel 6 (2437Mhz) flags 0x700e2 hal status 4294967291 May 10 07:58:56 Paradox924X kernel: [60088.466802] ath9k_config: Unable to set channel May 10 07:58:56 Paradox924X kernel: [60088.888194] ath_set_channel: unable to reset channel 7 (2442Mhz) flags 0x700e2 hal status 4294967291 May 10 07:58:56 Paradox924X kernel: [60088.888379] ath9k_config: Unable to set channel May 10 07:58:56 Paradox924X kernel: [60089.183365] ath_set_channel: unable to reset channel 8 (2447Mhz) flags 0x500e2 hal status 4294967291 May 10 07:58:56 Paradox924X kernel: [60089.183493] ath9k_config: Unable to set channel May 10 07:58:57 Paradox924X kernel: [60089.596694] ath_set_channel: unable to reset channel 9 (2452Mhz) flags 0x500e2 hal status 4294967291 May 10 07:58:57 Paradox924X kernel: [60089.596939] ath9k_config: Unable to set channel May 10 07:58:57 Paradox924X kernel: [60090.016734] ath_set_channel: unable to reset channel 10 (2457Mhz) flags 0x500e2 hal status 4294967291 May 10 07:58:57 Paradox924X kernel: [60090.017161] ath9k_config: Unable to set channel May 10 07:58:58 Paradox924X kernel: [60090.430486] ath_set_channel: unable to reset channel 11 (2462Mhz) flags 0x500e2 hal
Re: [Bug 289356] Re: ath9k causes system lockup
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 10:45 AM, Nikunj Mehta p...@paradox924x.com wrote: After changing CONFIG_MAC80211_DEFAULT_PS_VALUE from 1 to 0 in config.mk and recompiling compat-wireless and install/unload/load'ing, I get this in syslog once a minute: May 11 13:42:30 Paradox924X kernel: [ 2261.710024] phy1:mac80211_hwsim_config (freq=5825 radio_enabled=1 idle=0 ps=0) May 11 13:42:30 Paradox924X kernel: [ 2261.710032] phy1:mac80211_hwsim_configure_filter May 11 13:42:30 Paradox924X kernel: [ 2261.710113] phy0:mac80211_hwsim_config (freq=5825 radio_enabled=1 idle=0 ps=0) May 11 13:42:30 Paradox924X kernel: [ 2261.710119] phy0:mac80211_hwsim_configure_filter May 11 13:42:30 Paradox924X kernel: [ 2261.737061] phy1:mac80211_hwsim_config (freq=2412 radio_enabled=1 idle=0 ps=0) May 11 13:42:30 Paradox924X kernel: [ 2261.737069] phy0:mac80211_hwsim_config (freq=2412 radio_enabled=1 idle=0 ps=0) May 11 13:42:30 Paradox924X kernel: [ 2261.796055] phy0:mac80211_hwsim_config (freq=2417 radio_enabled=1 idle=0 ps=0) May 11 13:42:30 Paradox924X kernel: [ 2261.796457] phy1:mac80211_hwsim_config (freq=2417 radio_enabled=1 idle=0 ps=0) May 11 13:42:30 Paradox924X kernel: [ 2261.856097] phy0:mac80211_hwsim_config (freq=2422 radio_enabled=1 idle=0 ps=0) May 11 13:42:30 Paradox924X kernel: [ 2261.856693] phy1:mac80211_hwsim_config (freq=2422 radio_enabled=1 idle=0 ps=0) May 11 13:42:30 Paradox924X kernel: [ 2261.916040] phy0:mac80211_hwsim_config (freq=2427 radio_enabled=1 idle=0 ps=0) May 11 13:42:30 Paradox924X kernel: [ 2261.916048] phy1:mac80211_hwsim_config (freq=2427 radio_enabled=1 idle=0 ps=0) May 11 13:42:30 Paradox924X kernel: [ 2261.976041] phy0:mac80211_hwsim_config (freq=2432 radio_enabled=1 idle=0 ps=0) May 11 13:42:30 Paradox924X kernel: [ 2261.976049] phy1:mac80211_hwsim_config (freq=2432 radio_enabled=1 idle=0 ps=0) May 11 13:42:30 Paradox924X kernel: [ 2262.036058] phy0:mac80211_hwsim_config (freq=2437 radio_enabled=1 idle=0 ps=0) May 11 13:42:30 Paradox924X kernel: [ 2262.036070] phy1:mac80211_hwsim_config (freq=2437 radio_enabled=1 idle=0 ps=0) May 11 13:42:30 Paradox924X kernel: [ 2262.097205] phy0:mac80211_hwsim_config (freq=2442 radio_enabled=1 idle=0 ps=0) May 11 13:42:30 Paradox924X kernel: [ 2262.104068] phy1:mac80211_hwsim_config (freq=2442 radio_enabled=1 idle=0 ps=0) May 11 13:42:30 Paradox924X kernel: [ 2262.156064] phy0:mac80211_hwsim_config (freq=2447 radio_enabled=1 idle=0 ps=0) May 11 13:42:30 Paradox924X kernel: [ 2262.160509] phy1:mac80211_hwsim_config (freq=2447 radio_enabled=1 idle=0 ps=0) May 11 13:42:30 Paradox924X kernel: [ 2262.216063] phy0:mac80211_hwsim_config (freq=2452 radio_enabled=1 idle=0 ps=0) May 11 13:42:30 Paradox924X kernel: [ 2262.220475] phy1:mac80211_hwsim_config (freq=2452 radio_enabled=1 idle=0 ps=0) May 11 13:42:30 Paradox924X kernel: [ 2262.276042] phy0:mac80211_hwsim_config (freq=2457 radio_enabled=1 idle=0 ps=0) May 11 13:42:30 Paradox924X kernel: [ 2262.280521] phy1:mac80211_hwsim_config (freq=2457 radio_enabled=1 idle=0 ps=0) May 11 13:42:30 Paradox924X kernel: [ 2262.336085] phy0:mac80211_hwsim_config (freq=2462 radio_enabled=1 idle=0 ps=0) May 11 13:42:30 Paradox924X kernel: [ 2262.340450] phy1:mac80211_hwsim_config (freq=2462 radio_enabled=1 idle=0 ps=0) May 11 13:42:30 Paradox924X kernel: [ 2262.396054] phy0:mac80211_hwsim_config (freq=2467 radio_enabled=1 idle=0 ps=0) May 11 13:42:30 Paradox924X kernel: [ 2262.400584] phy1:mac80211_hwsim_config (freq=2467 radio_enabled=1 idle=0 ps=0) May 11 13:42:30 Paradox924X kernel: [ 2262.628058] phy0:mac80211_hwsim_config (freq=2472 radio_enabled=1 idle=0 ps=0) May 11 13:42:30 Paradox924X kernel: [ 2262.632483] phy1:mac80211_hwsim_config (freq=2472 radio_enabled=1 idle=0 ps=0) May 11 13:42:31 Paradox924X kernel: [ 2262.860041] phy0:mac80211_hwsim_config (freq=2484 radio_enabled=1 idle=0 ps=0) May 11 13:42:31 Paradox924X kernel: [ 2262.864588] phy1:mac80211_hwsim_config (freq=2484 radio_enabled=1 idle=0 ps=0) May 11 13:42:31 Paradox924X kernel: [ 2263.092059] phy0:mac80211_hwsim_config (freq=5180 radio_enabled=1 idle=0 ps=0) May 11 13:42:31 Paradox924X kernel: [ 2263.096472] phy1:mac80211_hwsim_config (freq=5180 radio_enabled=1 idle=0 ps=0) May 11 13:42:31 Paradox924X kernel: [ 2263.324054] phy0:mac80211_hwsim_config (freq=5200 radio_enabled=1 idle=0 ps=0) May 11 13:42:31 Paradox924X kernel: [ 2263.332051] phy1:mac80211_hwsim_config (freq=5200 radio_enabled=1 idle=0 ps=0) May 11 13:42:31 Paradox924X kernel: [ 2263.556064] phy0:mac80211_hwsim_config (freq=5220 radio_enabled=1 idle=0 ps=0) May 11 13:42:31 Paradox924X kernel: [ 2263.564053] phy1:mac80211_hwsim_config (freq=5220 radio_enabled=1 idle=0 ps=0) May 11 13:42:32 Paradox924X kernel: [ 2263.789353] phy0:mac80211_hwsim_config (freq=5240 radio_enabled=1 idle=0 ps=0) May 11 13:42:32 Paradox924X kernel: [ 2263.797054] phy1:mac80211_hwsim_config
[Bug 319378] Re: [ath9k] Kernel panic in 2.6.27-11
If the crash was due to ath9k and you are on an SMP system then your issue may be fixed with the latest patches I have posted which fixes this issue in wireless-testing down to 2.6.27. These patches have been posted to be merged into wireless-testing however they have not yet been merged so if you'd like to try then you'll have to apply patches yourself. Note that these patches are not yet merged into wireless- testing but will likely be so as of this week. The upstream kernel.org bug report is: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12110 The patches you can use to test: http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/mcgrof/patches/ath9k/2009-03-12/serialization-v6/ As far as performance is concerned please keep in mind 802.11n aggregation support was only enabled as of 2.6.29 so you'll need at least compat-wireless for that (but the patches for serialization fix need to yet be applied on top of that). -- [ath9k] Kernel panic in 2.6.27-11 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/319378 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 338470] Re: [jaunty] [ath9k] Critical system slowdown; buffer i/o errors and ata7 errors on failed encryted connection attempt
Please see: http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Documentation/Reporting_bugs There's an ubuntu section there as well, please read that too. -- [jaunty] [ath9k] Critical system slowdown; buffer i/o errors and ata7 errors on failed encryted connection attempt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/338470 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 289356] Re: ath9k causes system lockup
Suspend is not supported in mac80211 until 2.6.30 which you can only use right now through the wireless-testing git tree. To learn how to get that tree check out the wireless-testing git guide: http://wireless.kernel.org/en/developers/Documentation/git-guide If you don't want to compile that entire kernel you can try compat- wireless. Anyway as for the details of this bug report -- it seems you are no longer getting a crash, please confirm to close this bug report. -- ath9k causes system lockup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/289356 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 289356] Re: ath9k causes system lockup
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Stefano Rivera launch...@rivera.za.net wrote: Suspend is not supported in mac80211 until 2.6.30 which you can only use right now through the wireless-testing git tree. To learn how to get that tree check out the wireless-testing git guide: Shouldn't lbm be updated for that? Sure you can try that as well. Luis -- ath9k causes system lockup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/289356 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 325956] Re: [Unknown 14] ath9k continually spams ForceXPAon: 0
Missed Greg's line :) Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gre...@suse.de -- [Unknown 14] ath9k continually spams ForceXPAon: 0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/325956 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 325956] Re: [Unknown 14] ath9k continually spams ForceXPAon: 0
Fixed upstream on 2.6.27.13: http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/ChangeLog-2.6.27.13 commit e010592315ae5e33758e2e54afdd354ea77f4e62 Author: Luis R. Rodriguez lrodrig...@atheros.com Date: Tue Jan 20 11:42:43 2009 -0800 ath9k: quiet harmless ForceXPAon messages This is a port of one line of upstream patch f1dc56003b23d2d5bb5a756de6b1633a76c9e697 The ForceXPAon messages on ath9k were not meant to be printed regularly, lets quiet them as this can happen quite frequently (scans) and will fill the logs with tons of these messages. Signed-off-by: Sujith sujith.manoha...@atheros.com Signed-off-by: Luis R. Rodriguez lrodrig...@atheros.com -- [Unknown 14] ath9k continually spams ForceXPAon: 0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/325956 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 289356] Re: ath9k causes system lockup
Please upgrade to at least linux-image-2.6.27-11-generic. Please see: http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Drivers/ath9k#Mostcommonknownissues and to get the latest ath9k driver: http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Drivers/ath9k#Getthelatestath9kdriver -- ath9k causes system lockup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/289356 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 285857] Re: ath9k can't connect to networks
Please upgrade to at least linux-image-2.6.27-11-generic. Please see: http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Drivers/ath9k#Mostcommonknownissues and to get the latest ath9k driver: http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Drivers/ath9k#Getthelatestath9kdriver -- ath9k can't connect to networks https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/285857 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 278190] Re: [ath9k] AR5418 frequently fails to connect to WEP/WPA network
Please upgrade to at least linux-image-2.6.27-11-generic. Please see: http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Drivers/ath9k#Mostcommonknownissues and to get the latest ath9k driver: http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Drivers/ath9k#Getthelatestath9kdriver -- [ath9k] AR5418 frequently fails to connect to WEP/WPA network https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278190 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 270748] Re: ath9k wireless not working with AR9280
Please upgrade to at least linux-image-2.6.27-11-generic. Please see: http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Drivers/ath9k#Mostcommonknownissues and to get the latest ath9k driver: http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Drivers/ath9k#Getthelatestath9kdriver -- ath9k wireless not working with AR9280 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/270748 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 315056] Re: [jaunty] remove madwifi driver
If madwifi is present and so is ath5k and ath9k it is a bug. Please drop madwifi. -- [jaunty] remove madwifi driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/315056 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 300219] Re: Kerneloops resulting in a flashing Cap-lock led and a complete system freeze...
Please upgrade to at least linux-image-2.6.27-11-generic. Please see: http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Drivers/ath9k#Mostcommonknownissues and to get the latest ath9k driver: http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Drivers/ath9k#Getthelatestath9kdriver -- Kerneloops resulting in a flashing Cap-lock led and a complete system freeze... https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/300219 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 319378] Re: [ath9k] Kernel panic in 2.6.27-11
We need a stack trace (oops message). Do you have that? Please try to take a picture if you cannot get it. You can also try to get the panic by not using X, simply go into a virtual terminal. -- [ath9k] Kernel panic in 2.6.27-11 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/319378 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 317839] Re: Atheros Network Card timeouts with Kernel 2.6.28-4.10
I submitted a patch for this issue and its fixed in 2.6.28.1, please feel free to try that. -- Atheros Network Card timeouts with Kernel 2.6.28-4.10 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/317839 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 278190] Re: [ath9k] AR5418 frequently fails to connect to WEP/WPA network
FYI Bluetooth coexsistance is now supported in ath9k, and its available on AR9280 revision 10 and later. To test use the btcoex_enable module parameter. This is available on compat-wireless. -- [ath9k] AR5418 frequently fails to connect to WEP/WPA network https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278190 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 267089] Re: 2.6.27-2 kernel on intrepid: disk is mounted in RO after several hours
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 5:43 AM, John Pugh john.p...@canonical.com wrote: Sorry I replied and quoted the entire message above I do not think this is completely fixed. This bug https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/intrepid/+source/linux/+bug/278190 manifests itself after some time running with no other processes. I can re-create on my Macbook Pro v3,1 with 2.6.27-11 This kernel fixes the original symptoms, but still has ath9k problems. And how is that relevant to this bug report? BTW you can always do: sudo apt-get install linux-backports-modules-intrepid To get the bleeding edge ath9k. Luis -- 2.6.27-2 kernel on intrepid: disk is mounted in RO after several hours https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267089 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 267089] Re: 2.6.27-2 kernel on intrepid: disk is mounted in RO after several hours
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 11:23 AM, Leann Ogasawara leann.ogasaw...@canonical.com wrote: ** Tags removed: pet-bug -- 2.6.27-2 kernel on intrepid: disk is mounted in RO after several hours https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267089 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. What does pet-bug mean? This has been long fixed as of 2.6.27.8. If intrepid has at least this kernel then this can be closed. Luis -- 2.6.27-2 kernel on intrepid: disk is mounted in RO after several hours https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267089 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 267089] Re: 2.6.27-2 kernel on intrepid: disk is mounted in RO after several hours
2.6.27.8 was released with 2/3 of these patches: Patch: ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/patch-2.6.27.8.bz2 Full source: ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/linux-2.6.27.8.tar.bz2 -- 2.6.27-2 kernel on intrepid: disk is mounted in RO after several hours https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267089 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 267089] Re: 2.6.27-2 kernel on intrepid: disk is mounted in RO after several hours
Please subscribe to the kernel.org bugzilla bug instead and please comment on the questions posted there: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11811 -- 2.6.27-2 kernel on intrepid: disk is mounted in RO after several hours https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267089 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 267089] Re: 2.6.27-2 kernel on intrepid: disk is mounted in RO after several hours
OK so there a few bug reports on different sites, please stop posting to this one and refer to this one from now on: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11811 If a fix comes up it will be propagated. For now try booting with mem=3G -- 2.6.27-2 kernel on intrepid: disk is mounted in RO after several hours https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267089 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 267089] Re: 2.6.27-2 kernel on intrepid: disk is mounted in RO after several hours
Seems a lot of you are running into it, we're going to look into it on ath9k. Unfortunately we don't have the hardware to reproduce though but will try to get some and zero in on it. Let us see if it is ath9k related and if so we'll fix it. -- 2.6.27-2 kernel on intrepid: disk is mounted in RO after several hours https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267089 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 267089] Re: 2.6.27-2 kernel on intrepid: disk is mounted in RO after several hours
BTW what type of APs do you guys have? 11n or 11G? -- 2.6.27-2 kernel on intrepid: disk is mounted in RO after several hours https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267089 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 267089] Re: 2.6.27-2 kernel on intrepid: disk is mounted in RO after several hours
Also please provide the output of lsmod | grep -i ata -- 2.6.27-2 kernel on intrepid: disk is mounted in RO after several hours https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267089 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 267089] Re: 2.6.27-2 kernel on intrepid: disk is mounted in RO after several hours
OK I was not able to reproduce this on a x86_64 box with 7 GB of memory on 2.6.27.5-101.fc10.x86_64. Do you guys have something like this on lspci: Intel Corporation Mobile PM965/GM965/GL960 Memory Controller Hub It seems the Intel 965 memory controller does IOMMU in software so I wonder if that is 100% correct if its the software for that. Not sure, just something someone pointed out to me. You can try these patches, the first one just clarifies the type of memory we want to deal with the second one makes it consistent. http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/mcgrof/patches/ath9k/2008-11-14/ -- 2.6.27-2 kernel on intrepid: disk is mounted in RO after several hours https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267089 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 267089] Re: 2.6.27-2 kernel on intrepid: disk is mounted in RO after several hours
Fedora guy ran into this as well: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471329 Perhaps we shoul dmove this to kernel.org... -- 2.6.27-2 kernel on intrepid: disk is mounted in RO after several hours https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267089 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 272156] Re: ath9k makes ubuntu Intrepid Ibex 8.10 alpha 6 crash
Can more information be provided? Can the user disable Network Manager and wpa_supplicant completely: http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Reporting_bugs Then please use manual connection or wpa_supplicant and provide the logs of your session. Please keep in mind kernel.org kernel is at 2.6.27.4, the patch here was applied into 2.6.27.3 IIRC. -- ath9k makes ubuntu Intrepid Ibex 8.10 alpha 6 crash https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272156 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 272156] Re: ath9k makes ubuntu Intrepid Ibex 8.10 alpha 6 crash
This information in this bug report is not sufficient but I think I know what is causing it and we've already submitted a patch upstream. Please apply the patch attached. This happens only when your AP has not sent a BlockAck and the STA then decides it needs to ask the AP for one (BA request). I think this patch may have already been applied to the intrepid kernel? ** Attachment added: Fix lock on wrong spinlock upon a BA request http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18507275/0001-ath9k-fix-oops-on-trying-to-hold-the-wrong-spinlock.patch -- ath9k makes ubuntu Intrepid Ibex 8.10 alpha 6 crash https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272156 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 272156] Re: ath9k makes ubuntu Intrepid Ibex 8.10 alpha 6 crash
Tim has confirmed to me that this fix is already part of Interpid. http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git?p=ubuntu/ubuntu- intrepid.git;a=commit;h=d20a41e5475ded4f2a94e280723c5049a198506b -- ath9k makes ubuntu Intrepid Ibex 8.10 alpha 6 crash https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272156 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 272156] Re: ath9k makes ubuntu Intrepid Ibex 8.10 alpha 6 crash
I don't see any oops or picture of an oops attached, so I cannot help yet. ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: New = Incomplete -- ath9k makes ubuntu Intrepid Ibex 8.10 alpha 6 crash https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272156 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 272156] Re: ath9k makes ubuntu Intrepid Ibex 8.10 alpha 6 crash
BTW once you do get an oops please try the latest kernel and try to reproduce there. Kernel bugs should be reported on kernel.org bugzilla. Please see this list for a collection of bugs: http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Drivers/ath9k#Reportedbugsonath9k -- ath9k makes ubuntu Intrepid Ibex 8.10 alpha 6 crash https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272156 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 237746] Re: Update Hardy LBM to use upstream wireless-compat stack
Nice Nicolas, glad to see you went through the proper channels and got your issue resolved. My hope is that the compat-wireless helps users get the latest Linux wireless drivers *all the time* and to help vendors push drivers upstream *ASAP*, as well as fix them. The more users we get to test our wireless drivers the better shape our wireless drivers and stack will get by the stable kernel releases. Please let me know if you have further issues. -- Update Hardy LBM to use upstream wireless-compat stack https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/237746 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 237746] Re: Update Hardy LBM to use upstream wireless-compat stack
* Unresolved symbols: I'm looking into it * No LED/RFKILL: Led and RFKILL support need to be backported in order to enable them on compat-wirelesss. Patches are welcomed. * Ooops: If you get an oops it means the latest bleeding edge code very likely also causes it so you can simply report it to linux-wireless. The benefit though is that once it is fixed and the fix merged into wirless- testing.git compat-wireless automatically picks it up too. This is why we'd need frequent updates. -- Update Hardy LBM to use upstream wireless-compat stack https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/237746 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 237746] Re: Update Hardy LBM to use upstream wireless-compat stack
OK unresolved symbols issue has been fixed. A new package just need to be created. You can also just test the tarball from wireless.kernel.org. -- Update Hardy LBM to use upstream wireless-compat stack https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/237746 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 89381] Re: File Upload dialog has no preview for images
Confirmed, I've tested it on Firefox 3.0b3pre and I see its there. -- File Upload dialog has no preview for images https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/89381 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 89381] Re: File Upload dialog has no preview for images
Nope, sorry, I have no x86-64 box and really don't feel like cross compiling. -- File Upload dialog has no preview for images https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/89381 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 89381] Re: File Upload dialog has no preview for images
If Gnome upstream has closed that bug it is very unfortunate. I'm promoting Ubuntu for regular users and this happens to be a big complaint I have received so far. So in the meantime I'll tell my users to use a debian package I've built based on Stephen Cofer's patch. I just rebased it for 2.0.0.8+2nobinonly-0ubuntu0. Here is the deb, README.txt and patch: http://ruslug.rutgers.edu/~mcgrof/firefox/preview-pictures/ I'll attach the patch here as well. Luis ** Attachment added: Preview pane patch for firefox rebased on latest firefox package on edgy http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10244173/preview.diff -- File Upload dialog has no preview for images https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/89381 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 89381] Re: File Upload dialog has no preview for images
Sorry I meant for Gutsy ;) -- that patch is for gutsy.. -- File Upload dialog has no preview for images https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/89381 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 78626] mod_auth_ldap doesn't support SSL
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: apache2-common apache2 server log shows: error.log:[Tue Jan 09 18:02:44 2007] [notice] LDAP: SSL support unavailable indicating that auth_mod_ldap was not compiled with SSL support. ** Affects: apache2 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- mod_auth_ldap doesn't support SSL https://launchpad.net/bugs/78626 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 78626] Re: mod_auth_ldap doesn't support SSL
Please close it - it was a configuration issue. Adding LDAPTrustedCAType BASE64_FILE LDAPTrustedCA /etc/apache2/ssl/ca.pem to apache2.conf fixed it. -- mod_auth_ldap doesn't support SSL https://launchpad.net/bugs/78626 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 75535] Re: cannot connect to ldap
I believe now this bug needs to be re-assigned to libpam-ldap. Doing some digging there now. I have tested the same config files on a separate Ubuntu Dapper client. Now auth.log complains only through pam_ldap: Dec 13 14:10:58 web1 sshd[10443]: pam_ldap: ldap_simple_bind Can't contact LDAP server Dec 13 14:11:00 web1 sshd[10443]: Failed password for mcgrof from 192.168.xxx.yyy port 44978 ssh2 This is repeated if I try to enter the password again. Note that ldapsearch and id -a mcgrof works well on this new client box: -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# ldapsearch -x -H ldaps://dhcp1a.winlab.rutgers.edu -D uid=mcgrof,ou=People,dc=winlab,dc=rutgers,dc=edu -W -LLL cn=mc* dn Enter LDAP Password: dn: cn=mcgrof,ou=auto.home,dc=winlab,dc=rutgers,dc=edu dn: cn=mcyberey,ou=auto.home,dc=winlab,dc=rutgers,dc=edu -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# id -a mcgrof uid=230(mcgrof) gid=5000(staff) groups=5000(staff),6000(sysadmin) -- -- cannot connect to ldap https://launchpad.net/bugs/75535 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 75535] Re: cannot connect to ldap
I've traced this down to pam_ldap.c:1537: syslog (LOG_ERR, pam_ldap: ldap_simple_bind %s, Which is called during _connect_anonymously(). going to check why this is failing... -- cannot connect to ldap https://launchpad.net/bugs/75535 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 75535] Re: cannot connect to ldap
OK the trace is _get_user_info() -- _connect_anonymously() Now, _connect_anonymously() will try to bind as root if if (session-conf-rootbinddn geteuid () == 0) For some reason it does this for any user trying to ssh in from anywhere. It does this with: msgid = ldap_simple_bind (session-ld, session-conf-rootbinddn, session-conf-rootbindpw); rootbinddn and rootbindpw are filled with the specific root bind credentials defined only in /etc/ldap/slapd.conf. Now to figure out: Why did the session pick up rootbinddn. getuid() == 0 makes sense as I believe this is sshd which makes the pam_ldap call through root. -- cannot connect to ldap https://launchpad.net/bugs/75535 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 75535] Re: cannot connect to ldap
Nevermind -- problem was /etc/pam_ldap.conf I know it has been discussed before on merging /etc/libnss_ldap.conf and /etc/pam_ldap.conf but boy it sure it would help. Close this bug please. -- cannot connect to ldap https://launchpad.net/bugs/75535 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 75535] cannot connect to ldap
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: libnss-ldap I'm having problems getting an ubuntu 6.06.1 LTS host authenticate against against itself through ldap. That is this host is the ldap server (slapd-2.2.26-5ubuntu2.2) and I am trying to get it to authenticate against itself. Debian testing clients are able to authenticate just fine against the ldap server. Using the same client configuration files on the ubuntu server I cannot get it to authenticate against itself though through login or ssh. I've tried this using TLS and without TLS so that shouldn't be the problem. The fact that other debian testing boxes can authenticate just fine leads me to point to an ubuntu issue. Since this is not specific to ssh (login fails too) and since the only relevant error messages are lib_nss this leads me to point the finger to libnss-ldap. Connection to itself is allowed and has been tested, no iptables rules defined. tcpdump does show communication on tcp ldaps during authentication. Using ldapsearch works just fine. While searching for bugs I found certain bugs reported on edgy: https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+source/libnss-ldap/+bug/70146 So I ported the patch referred to there to Dapper. At the end you will find the patch in case you find it useful. Anyway, that didn't do the trick. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/devel/libnss-ldap# ldapsearch -x -H ldaps://dhcp1a.winlab.rutgers.edu -D uid=mcgrof,ou=People,dc=winlab,dc=rutgers,dc=edu -W -LLL cn=mc* dn Enter LDAP Password: dn: cn=mcgrof,ou=auto.home,dc=winlab,dc=rutgers,dc=edu dn: cn=mcyberey,ou=auto.home,dc=winlab,dc=rutgers,dc=edu -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/devel/libnss-ldap# netstat -tlp | grep ldap tcp0 0 localhost:ldap *:* LISTEN 8298/slapd tcp0 0 *:ldaps *:* LISTEN 8298/slapd tcp6 0 0 *:ldaps *:* LISTEN 8298/slapd /var/log/auth.log reports: pam_ldap: ldap_simple_bind Can't contact LDAP server If you try again you get: Dec 12 17:45:33 dhcp1a sshd[20330]: pam_ldap: ldap_simple_bind Can't contact LDAP server Dec 12 17:45:33 dhcp1a sshd[20330]: nss_ldap: reconnecting to LDAP server... Dec 12 17:45:33 dhcp1a sshd[20330]: nss_ldap: reconnected to LDAP server after 1 attempt(s) Dec 12 17:45:35 dhcp1a sshd[20326]: error: PAM: Authentication service cannot retrieve authentication info. for mcgrof from localhost -- /etc/ldap/ldap.conf BASEdc=winlab,dc=rutgers,dc=edu URI ldaps://dhcp1a.winlab.rutgers.edu TLS_CACERT /etc/ldap/CAcert.pem -- /etc/libnss-ldap.conf host dhcp1a.winlab.rutgers.edu base dc=winlab,dc=rutgers,dc=edu uri ldaps://dhcp1a.winlab.rutgers.edu ldap_version 3 port 636 bind_policy soft ssl on tls_checkpeer no -- /etc/nsswitch.conf passwd: files ldap compat group: files ldap compat shadow: files ldap compat hosts: files dns networks: files protocols: db files services: db files ethers: db files rpc:db files netgroup: nis automount: ldap -- /etc/pam.d/common-auth authsufficient pam_ldap.so authrequiredpam_nologin.so authrequiredpam_env.so authrequiredpam_unix.so use_first_pass -- /etc/pam.d/common-account account sufficient pam_ldap.so account requiredpam_unix.so account requiredpam_nologin.so -- /etc/pam.d/common-password passwordsufficient pam_ldap.so use_authok password sufficientpam_unix.so use_authtok nullok md5 -- /etc/pam.d/ssh auth required pam_nologin.so auth required pam_env.so auth sufficient pam_ldap.so auth required pam_unix.so use_first_pass account [success=done new_authtok_reqd=done perm_denied=bad default=ignore] pam_ldap.so account required pam_unix.so account required pam_nologin.so session required pam_unix.so session required pam_limits.so -- /etc/ssh/sshd_config Port 22 Protocol 2 HostKey /etc/ssh/ssh_host_rsa_key HostKey /etc/ssh/ssh_host_dsa_key UsePrivilegeSeparation yes KeyRegenerationInterval 3600 ServerKeyBits 768 SyslogFacility AUTH LogLevel INFO LoginGraceTime 600 PermitRootLogin yes StrictModes yes RSAAuthentication yes PubkeyAuthentication yes IgnoreRhosts yes RhostsRSAAuthentication no HostbasedAuthentication no PermitEmptyPasswords no PasswordAuthentication no X11Forwarding yes X11DisplayOffset 10 PrintMotd yes PrintLastLog yes KeepAlive yes Subsystem sftp /usr/lib/openssh/sftp-server UsePAM yes -- /etc/default/slapd SLAPD_CONF= SLAPD_USER= SLAPD_GROUP= SLAPD_PIDFILE= TRY_BDB_RECOVERY=yes SLURPD_START=auto SLAPD_SERVICES=ldap://127.0.0.1:389/ ldaps:/// SLAPD_OPTIONS= SLURPD_OPTIONS= -- Backported LaMont Jones' patch for initgroups to Dapper: diff -ur t/libnss-ldap-251/debian/changelog libnss-ldap-251/debian/changelog --- t/libnss-ldap-251/debian/changelog 2006-11-21 07:47:11.0 -0700 +++
