[Bug 1181777] Re: kvm: freeze a guest with a NIC PCI passthrough

2013-09-18 Thread Nigel Jones
After getting the bug mail for this bug and reading it with interest, I happened to run into this issue today myself and did some investigation at a seabios level. My original hit of the issue was with RHEL, but I reproduced it with the same card (Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8111/8168/8411

[Bug 571093] Re: [SRU] multipath + libvirtd eats away more memory over time

2010-08-16 Thread Nigel Jones
Steve, Looks like the latest version of the patch was not applied (libvirt maintainers applied a modified patch to upstream that fixed a couple more memory leaks. This version does work, but I know others still had some lingering problems that I couldn't reproduce. The patch they are now using

[Bug 455832] Re: segfault when attaching disk with same physical device

2010-08-26 Thread Nigel Jones
Attached is proposed debdiff for SRU. Also includes updated patch for Bug #571093 ** Description changed: I was testing attaching and detaching an AoE block device and all was going fine until I tried to attach a device twice in a row without changing the target device. Doing so resulted

[Bug 571093] Re: [SRU] multipath + libvirtd eats away more memory over time

2010-08-26 Thread Nigel Jones
I've included the attached patch in an SRU candidate for Bug #455832, you can view the proposed debdiff there. ** Patch added: 9024-free-memory-for-invalid-devices.patch

[Bug 589063] Re: Windows Server 2008 won't boot with more than 4 vCPUs

2010-08-26 Thread Nigel Jones
I can confirm this is an issue in Lucid w/ qemu-kvm 0.12.3+noroms- 0ubuntu9. Microsoft Kbase has a little bit of details of specifically is likely to be wrong, at http://support.microsoft.com/kb/314830 (browse down to 0x0011) -- Windows Server 2008 won't boot with more than 4 vCPUs

[Bug 589063] Re: Windows Server 2008 won't boot with more than 4 vCPUs

2010-08-27 Thread Nigel Jones
I've had a bit more of a look... I have been experimenting w/ Windows 2008 64-bit original release installing the Enterprise edition. Lucid ships with seabios 0.5.1-0ubuntu2 which experiences the issue. Maverick ships with seabios 0.6.0-0ubuntu1 which from my testing doesn't. I did a quick

[Bug 589063] Re: Windows Server 2008 won't boot with more than 4 vCPUs

2010-08-27 Thread Nigel Jones
** Changed in: seabios (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- Windows Server 2008 won't boot with more than 4 vCPUs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/589063 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in ubuntu. --

[Bug 589063] Re: Windows Server 2008 won't boot with more than 4 vCPUs

2010-08-27 Thread Nigel Jones
I isolated fix to upstream patch http://git.linuxtogo.org/?p=kevin/seabios.git;a=blobdiff;f=src/acpi.c;h=244536a276ae360f016e58b2eefaee83654abd75;hp=f613b034120d3595f9e9c4104acffbeae8dbd228;hb=3012af189e0f89bd33df1c0711a46f098053e9a7;hpb=92a5742b5f9f217ba6315fa13d075ba98ebc3fd6 If someone wants

[Bug 589063] Re: Windows Server 2008 won't boot with more than 4 vCPUs

2010-08-27 Thread Nigel Jones
I was going to try and get hold of Dustin via IRC, but I wasn't able to. I'm not sure how this package fits into the Server SRU picture, and I'm not really in a position to call how safe an ACPI change like this on it's own is (although, this was the first of only a few that I can tell between

[Bug 589063] Re: Windows Server 2008 won't boot with more than 4 vCPUs

2010-08-30 Thread Nigel Jones
Thanks for the testing Troy. Just attaching the individual patch from the debdiff for now, I'll check w/ the Server Team regarding getting this as an SRU. ** Patch added: Patch included in SRU Debdiff 0001-fix-PkgLength-calculation-for-the-SSDT.patch

[Bug 619302] Re: kvm -initrd 'file' dumps core if 'file' does not exist

2010-08-30 Thread Nigel Jones
I've done a bit of digging here: I encounter the issue in both Lucid and Maverick. gdb on the generated core, w/ a 'bt' shows: snip #2 0x0046f2c5 in oom_check (size=value optimised out) at qemu-malloc.c:30 #3 qemu_malloc (size=value optimised out) at qemu-malloc.c:59 #4

[Bug 619302] Re: kvm -initrd 'file' dumps core if 'file' does not exist

2010-08-30 Thread Nigel Jones
Upstream have fixed this in commit d6fa4b77fb8f27ac84cf23fb1e15016673d98a47 Which I have modified for what we currently have in Lucid Maverick, the patch seems to apply cleanly. Tested with Maverick already and seems to be fine. ** Patch added: Proposed patch from upstream git

[Bug 619302] Re: kvm -initrd 'file' dumps core if 'file' does not exist

2010-08-30 Thread Nigel Jones
** Changed in: qemu-kvm (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- kvm -initrd 'file' dumps core if 'file' does not exist https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/619302 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in ubuntu. --

[Bug 615077] Re: [Maverick] SDL local window broken in last update

2010-08-31 Thread Nigel Jones
I can confirm this on a clean install from the Maverick 20100816 Desktop CD Build (will update shortly in case another update has fixed it), I have a feeling that this might be an X bug. Running via virt-manager I get exactly the same output as Dave, however when running from a gnome-terminal

[Bug 615077] Re: [Maverick] SDL local window broken in last update

2010-08-31 Thread Nigel Jones
More testing: only happens if XAUTHORITY is set as an environment variable it seems, an interesting thing to note is that xhost doesn't work either, so it doesn't look like an AIGLX bug (I disabled it) but it does look X related. -- [Maverick] SDL local window broken in last update

[Bug 615077] Re: [Maverick] SDL local window broken in last update

2010-08-31 Thread Nigel Jones
** Tags added: regression-potential -- [Maverick] SDL local window broken in last update https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/615077 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list

[Bug 615077] Re: [Maverick] SDL local window broken in last update

2010-08-31 Thread Nigel Jones
I've tagged the bug regression-potential as it looks like a regression between Lucid Maverick, here is what I know from reproducing: Reproduction: Bug can be reproduced by creating (in virt-manager) on a clean Maverick install, by creating a virtual machine, editing the configuration (using

[Bug 615077] Re: [Maverick] SDL local window broken in last update

2010-08-31 Thread Nigel Jones
** Attachment added: strace Output - parent process https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu-kvm/+bug/615077/+attachment/1531966/+files/qemuregbroke.1904.gz -- [Maverick] SDL local window broken in last update https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/615077 You received this bug notification

[Bug 455832] Re: segfault when attaching disk with same physical device

2010-09-18 Thread Nigel Jones
FYI: The uploaded package still works: njo...@fantail:~$ apt-cache policy libvirt-bin libvirt-bin: Installed: 0.7.5-5ubuntu27.3 Candidate: 0.7.5-5ubuntu27.3 Version table: *** 0.7.5-5ubuntu27.3 0 500 http://nz.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid-proposed/main Packages 100

[Bug 571093] Re: [SRU] multipath + libvirtd eats away more memory over time

2010-09-18 Thread Nigel Jones
I've tested this bug again w/ the new patch, it is working fine as expected for me, w/ no increase of RES memory while running the multipath commands to add/remove devices in udev. Looks ready to me (and w/ my testing of bug #455832), it should be ready for pushing. -- [SRU] multipath +

[Bug 571093] Re: [SRU] multipath + libvirtd eats away more memory over time

2010-09-18 Thread Nigel Jones
** Tags added: verification-done ** Tags removed: verification-needed -- [SRU] multipath + libvirtd eats away more memory over time https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/571093 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to libvirt in ubuntu.

[Bug 455832] Re: segfault when attaching disk with same physical device

2010-09-18 Thread Nigel Jones
To be clear, when I said FYI: The uploaded package still works: I had meant: The uploaded package contains the correct fix. The 'target vdc already exists' error message is the correct error message for this patch. ** Tags added: verification-done ** Tags removed: verification-needed --

[Bug 571093] Re: multipath + libvirtd eats away more memory over time

2010-05-19 Thread Nigel Jones
I've done a bit of an experiment and this is what I've found: Running valgrind on libvirtd -v ($ sudo valgrind -v --leak-check=full --show-reachable=yes /usr/sbin/libvirtd -v) produced the output in lp571093-libvirt-val-run1 A quick summary: ==15520== 78,696 (18,048 direct, 60,648 indirect)

[Bug 571093] Re: multipath + libvirtd eats away more memory over time

2010-05-20 Thread Nigel Jones
Some more investigation: --technical bits-- (non tech lower down) libvirtd debug logging (attached) shows running multipath -F/multipath -v4 does the following: 14:02:28.570: debug : udevEventHandleCallback:1363 : udev action: 'add' 14:02:28.570: info : udevGetDeviceProperty:111 : udev reports

[Bug 571093] Re: multipath + libvirtd eats away more memory over time

2010-05-24 Thread Nigel Jones
I've had another look at this bug, reproducing etc, this time through GDB, with the output from valgrind the debug output in my last two posts, here is what I believe is happening: 1. multipath -v4 gets called (or other appropriate trigger) - multipath detects a device that it believes is new,

[Bug 571093] Re: multipath + libvirtd eats away more memory over time

2010-05-24 Thread Nigel Jones
Okay, I've created a patch that should fix the issue in two ways, first as observed in my previous comment I suspected that adding a virNodeDeviceDefFree(def) to udevAddOneDevice() would solve the issue, it for the most part did but still left approximately an 8k RES memory leak. Looking at the

[Bug 585027] [NEW] Race condition with dmsetup causes 'map already present' messages

2010-05-24 Thread Nigel Jones
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: multipath-tools Environment: njo...@fantail:~$ lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Release:10.04 njo...@fantail:~$ apt-cache policy multipath-tools multipath-tools:   Installed: 0.4.8-14ubuntu4   Candidate: 0.4.8-14ubuntu4   Version

[Bug 571093] Re: [SRU] multipath + libvirtd eats away more memory over time

2010-05-24 Thread Nigel Jones
I have forwarded the bug/patch to Debian BTS as http://bugs.debian.org /cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=582965 so they can incorporate the fix there. ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #582965 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=582965 ** Also affects: libvirt (Debian) via

[Bug 455832] Re: segfault when attaching disk with same physical device

2010-05-24 Thread Nigel Jones
I had a look at this bug and I seem to have prevented it, i.e.: njo...@fantail:~$ cat /tmp/455832.xml disk type='block' driver name='virtio'/ source dev='/dev/sdd'/ target dev='vdc' bus='virtio'/ /disk (sdd is a USB stick) Before patch: njo...@fantail:~$ virsh list; virsh destroy

[Bug 455832] Re: segfault when attaching disk with same physical device

2010-05-24 Thread Nigel Jones
Also, I forgot to mention in my previous comment, I'm yet to determine if this also affects the current release of libvirt. -- segfault when attaching disk with same physical device https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/455832 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 455832] Re: segfault when attaching disk with same physical device

2010-05-25 Thread Nigel Jones
** Tags added: patch -- segfault when attaching disk with same physical device https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/455832 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to libvirt in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list

[Bug 571093] Re: [SRU] multipath + libvirtd eats away more memory over time

2010-05-25 Thread Nigel Jones
Ariel, What was the previous rate of increase? I don't personally have the hardware to reproduce the issue (looks like ocfs2 + EMC SAN based on your udev output), so could you maybe provide the following: * valgrind -v --leak-check=full --show-reachable=yes /usr/sbin/libvirtd -v (Once it's

[Bug 567701] Re: Date not updated by ntp when network interfaces started

2010-05-26 Thread Nigel Jones
Just to note, this appears to be working out of the box with current Maverick packages for me, there appears to be quite a few changes to NTP packaging as well. -- Date not updated by ntp when network interfaces started https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/567701 You received this bug notification

[Bug 585027] Re: Race condition with dmsetup causes 'map already present' messages

2010-05-26 Thread Nigel Jones
Yes, as stated in my original comment, it is reproducible (myself and Dustin Kirkland), with variants of while true; do sudo multipath -F; sudo multipath -v4 ; done. All that is required is a device that multipath will create a /dev/mapper entry for (use_friendly_names or not) and remove with -F

[Bug 500385] Re: [needs-packaging] SPICE

2012-02-09 Thread Nigel Jones
Since SPICE was introduced into Debian, it was picked up for Oneiric and Precise, so I'm going to close the bug as it no longer needs packaging. ** Changed in: ubuntu Assignee: Nigel Jones (dev-nigelj) = (unassigned) ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: In Progress = Fix Released -- You

[Bug 721707] Re: FFe. Please merge zabbix 1:1.8.4-2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2011-06-10 Thread Nigel Jones
Thanks to micahg geser on IRC, it seems what has happened (and quoting from the bugs.debian.org bug I just submitted...) is: It was noticed [...] with the LDAP linker bug patched (the same patch as in Debian Bug #556770), that the patches do not get properly applied by dpkg-buildpackage, when it

[Bug 722300] Re: Zabbix 1.8.4-2 ftbfs with binutils-gold

2011-05-03 Thread Nigel Jones
Hi Mahyuddin, I realise you were assigned to the bug, but as I hadn't seen any activity I went ahead and incorporated the patch that Gentoo used for http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=333425 (attachment http://bugs.gentoo.org/attachment.cgi?id=258946action=diff), which fixes the FTBFS issue.

[Bug 721707] Re: FFe. Please merge zabbix 1:1.8.4-2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2011-05-03 Thread Nigel Jones
Since Oneiric is now the dev target, I've created a merge proposal for 1:1.8.4-3 (current Debian version) to be entered into Ubuntu. ** Changed in: zabbix (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 574059] Re: [needs-packaging] Pino

2010-05-18 Thread Nigel Jones
There seems to be a Ubuntu PPA package for pino in https://launchpad.net/~troorl/+archive/pino -- [needs-packaging] Pino https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/574059 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 500385] Re: [needs-packaging] SPICE

2010-05-18 Thread Nigel Jones
I can't change the status of the bug, but I have myself begun working on this, I am somewhat familiar with the workings on SPICE. -- [needs-packaging] SPICE https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/500385 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 500385] Re: [needs-packaging] SPICE

2010-05-18 Thread Nigel Jones
** Changed in: ubuntu Assignee: (unassigned) = Nigel Jones (dev-nigelj) ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: New = In Progress -- [needs-packaging] SPICE https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/500385 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 571093] Re: multipath + libvirtd eats away more memory over time

2010-05-19 Thread Nigel Jones
I've done a bit of an experiment and this is what I've found: Running valgrind on libvirtd -v ($ sudo valgrind -v --leak-check=full --show-reachable=yes /usr/sbin/libvirtd -v) produced the output in lp571093-libvirt-val-run1 A quick summary: ==15520== 78,696 (18,048 direct, 60,648 indirect)

[Bug 582793] Re: [needs-packaging] Multiple Direct Communicator

2010-05-19 Thread Nigel Jones
** Description changed: MDC (Multiple Direct Communicator) - is a versatile multi-messenger with support for operating systems Windows, Linux, MacOS X and protocols, ICQ, Mail.Agent, Jabber, and others an intuitive interface, storage history on the server, combining contacts from

[Bug 571093] Re: multipath + libvirtd eats away more memory over time

2010-05-20 Thread Nigel Jones
Some more investigation: --technical bits-- (non tech lower down) libvirtd debug logging (attached) shows running multipath -F/multipath -v4 does the following: 14:02:28.570: debug : udevEventHandleCallback:1363 : udev action: 'add' 14:02:28.570: info : udevGetDeviceProperty:111 : udev reports

[Bug 455832] Re: segfault when attaching disk with same physical device

2010-09-18 Thread Nigel Jones
FYI: The uploaded package still works: njo...@fantail:~$ apt-cache policy libvirt-bin libvirt-bin: Installed: 0.7.5-5ubuntu27.3 Candidate: 0.7.5-5ubuntu27.3 Version table: *** 0.7.5-5ubuntu27.3 0 500 http://nz.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid-proposed/main Packages 100

[Bug 571093] Re: [SRU] multipath + libvirtd eats away more memory over time

2010-09-18 Thread Nigel Jones
I've tested this bug again w/ the new patch, it is working fine as expected for me, w/ no increase of RES memory while running the multipath commands to add/remove devices in udev. Looks ready to me (and w/ my testing of bug #455832), it should be ready for pushing. -- [SRU] multipath +

[Bug 571093] Re: [SRU] multipath + libvirtd eats away more memory over time

2010-09-18 Thread Nigel Jones
** Tags added: verification-done ** Tags removed: verification-needed -- [SRU] multipath + libvirtd eats away more memory over time https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/571093 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 455832] Re: segfault when attaching disk with same physical device

2010-09-18 Thread Nigel Jones
To be clear, when I said FYI: The uploaded package still works: I had meant: The uploaded package contains the correct fix. The 'target vdc already exists' error message is the correct error message for this patch. ** Tags added: verification-done ** Tags removed: verification-needed --

[Bug 571093] Re: multipath + libvirtd eats away more memory over time

2010-05-24 Thread Nigel Jones
I've had another look at this bug, reproducing etc, this time through GDB, with the output from valgrind the debug output in my last two posts, here is what I believe is happening: 1. multipath -v4 gets called (or other appropriate trigger) - multipath detects a device that it believes is new,

[Bug 571093] Re: multipath + libvirtd eats away more memory over time

2010-05-24 Thread Nigel Jones
Okay, I've created a patch that should fix the issue in two ways, first as observed in my previous comment I suspected that adding a virNodeDeviceDefFree(def) to udevAddOneDevice() would solve the issue, it for the most part did but still left approximately an 8k RES memory leak. Looking at the

[Bug 585027] [NEW] Race condition with dmsetup causes 'map already present' messages

2010-05-24 Thread Nigel Jones
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: multipath-tools Environment: njo...@fantail:~$ lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Release:10.04 njo...@fantail:~$ apt-cache policy multipath-tools multipath-tools:   Installed: 0.4.8-14ubuntu4   Candidate: 0.4.8-14ubuntu4   Version

[Bug 571093] Re: [SRU] multipath + libvirtd eats away more memory over time

2010-05-24 Thread Nigel Jones
I have forwarded the bug/patch to Debian BTS as http://bugs.debian.org /cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=582965 so they can incorporate the fix there. ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #582965 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=582965 ** Also affects: libvirt (Debian) via

[Bug 455832] Re: segfault when attaching disk with same physical device

2010-05-24 Thread Nigel Jones
I had a look at this bug and I seem to have prevented it, i.e.: njo...@fantail:~$ cat /tmp/455832.xml disk type='block' driver name='virtio'/ source dev='/dev/sdd'/ target dev='vdc' bus='virtio'/ /disk (sdd is a USB stick) Before patch: njo...@fantail:~$ virsh list; virsh destroy

[Bug 455832] Re: segfault when attaching disk with same physical device

2010-05-24 Thread Nigel Jones
Also, I forgot to mention in my previous comment, I'm yet to determine if this also affects the current release of libvirt. -- segfault when attaching disk with same physical device https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/455832 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 455832] Re: segfault when attaching disk with same physical device

2010-05-25 Thread Nigel Jones
** Tags added: patch -- segfault when attaching disk with same physical device https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/455832 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 589063] Re: Windows Server 2008 won't boot with more than 4 vCPUs

2010-08-26 Thread Nigel Jones
I can confirm this is an issue in Lucid w/ qemu-kvm 0.12.3+noroms- 0ubuntu9. Microsoft Kbase has a little bit of details of specifically is likely to be wrong, at http://support.microsoft.com/kb/314830 (browse down to 0x0011) -- Windows Server 2008 won't boot with more than 4 vCPUs

[Bug 589063] Re: Windows Server 2008 won't boot with more than 4 vCPUs

2010-08-27 Thread Nigel Jones
I've had a bit more of a look... I have been experimenting w/ Windows 2008 64-bit original release installing the Enterprise edition. Lucid ships with seabios 0.5.1-0ubuntu2 which experiences the issue. Maverick ships with seabios 0.6.0-0ubuntu1 which from my testing doesn't. I did a quick

[Bug 589063] Re: Windows Server 2008 won't boot with more than 4 vCPUs

2010-08-27 Thread Nigel Jones
** Changed in: seabios (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- Windows Server 2008 won't boot with more than 4 vCPUs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/589063 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 589063] Re: Windows Server 2008 won't boot with more than 4 vCPUs

2010-08-27 Thread Nigel Jones
I isolated fix to upstream patch http://git.linuxtogo.org/?p=kevin/seabios.git;a=blobdiff;f=src/acpi.c;h=244536a276ae360f016e58b2eefaee83654abd75;hp=f613b034120d3595f9e9c4104acffbeae8dbd228;hb=3012af189e0f89bd33df1c0711a46f098053e9a7;hpb=92a5742b5f9f217ba6315fa13d075ba98ebc3fd6 If someone wants

[Bug 589063] Re: Windows Server 2008 won't boot with more than 4 vCPUs

2010-08-27 Thread Nigel Jones
I was going to try and get hold of Dustin via IRC, but I wasn't able to. I'm not sure how this package fits into the Server SRU picture, and I'm not really in a position to call how safe an ACPI change like this on it's own is (although, this was the first of only a few that I can tell between

[Bug 589063] Re: Windows Server 2008 won't boot with more than 4 vCPUs

2010-08-30 Thread Nigel Jones
Thanks for the testing Troy. Just attaching the individual patch from the debdiff for now, I'll check w/ the Server Team regarding getting this as an SRU. ** Patch added: Patch included in SRU Debdiff 0001-fix-PkgLength-calculation-for-the-SSDT.patch

[Bug 619302] Re: kvm -initrd 'file' dumps core if 'file' does not exist

2010-08-30 Thread Nigel Jones
I've done a bit of digging here: I encounter the issue in both Lucid and Maverick. gdb on the generated core, w/ a 'bt' shows: snip #2 0x0046f2c5 in oom_check (size=value optimised out) at qemu-malloc.c:30 #3 qemu_malloc (size=value optimised out) at qemu-malloc.c:59 #4

[Bug 619302] Re: kvm -initrd 'file' dumps core if 'file' does not exist

2010-08-30 Thread Nigel Jones
Upstream have fixed this in commit d6fa4b77fb8f27ac84cf23fb1e15016673d98a47 Which I have modified for what we currently have in Lucid Maverick, the patch seems to apply cleanly. Tested with Maverick already and seems to be fine. ** Patch added: Proposed patch from upstream git

[Bug 619302] Re: kvm -initrd 'file' dumps core if 'file' does not exist

2010-08-30 Thread Nigel Jones
** Changed in: qemu-kvm (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- kvm -initrd 'file' dumps core if 'file' does not exist https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/619302 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing

[Bug 615077] Re: [Maverick] SDL local window broken in last update

2010-08-31 Thread Nigel Jones
I can confirm this on a clean install from the Maverick 20100816 Desktop CD Build (will update shortly in case another update has fixed it), I have a feeling that this might be an X bug. Running via virt-manager I get exactly the same output as Dave, however when running from a gnome-terminal

[Bug 615077] Re: [Maverick] SDL local window broken in last update

2010-08-31 Thread Nigel Jones
More testing: only happens if XAUTHORITY is set as an environment variable it seems, an interesting thing to note is that xhost doesn't work either, so it doesn't look like an AIGLX bug (I disabled it) but it does look X related. -- [Maverick] SDL local window broken in last update

[Bug 615077] Re: [Maverick] SDL local window broken in last update

2010-08-31 Thread Nigel Jones
** Tags added: regression-potential -- [Maverick] SDL local window broken in last update https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/615077 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 615077] Re: [Maverick] SDL local window broken in last update

2010-08-31 Thread Nigel Jones
I've tagged the bug regression-potential as it looks like a regression between Lucid Maverick, here is what I know from reproducing: Reproduction: Bug can be reproduced by creating (in virt-manager) on a clean Maverick install, by creating a virtual machine, editing the configuration (using

[Bug 615077] Re: [Maverick] SDL local window broken in last update

2010-08-31 Thread Nigel Jones
** Attachment added: strace Output - parent process https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu-kvm/+bug/615077/+attachment/1531966/+files/qemuregbroke.1904.gz -- [Maverick] SDL local window broken in last update https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/615077 You received this bug notification

[Bug 615077] Re: [Maverick] SDL local window broken in last update

2010-08-31 Thread Nigel Jones
** Attachment added: strace Output - forked process https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu-kvm/+bug/615077/+attachment/1531976/+files/qemuregbroke.1905 -- [Maverick] SDL local window broken in last update https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/615077 You received this bug notification

[Bug 455832] Re: segfault when attaching disk with same physical device

2010-08-26 Thread Nigel Jones
Sorry, I forgot to mention that since my bug report, it has been fixed upstream, looks like: commit eebf932e9418b8a626488ced40294e4f5d580e49 Author: Jim Meyering meyer...@redhat.com Date: Wed Dec 16 14:15:50 2009 +0100 qemu_driver.c: avoid NULL dereference upon disk-op failure *

[Bug 455832] Re: segfault when attaching disk with same physical device

2010-08-26 Thread Nigel Jones
Attached is proposed debdiff for SRU. Also includes updated patch for Bug #571093 ** Description changed: I was testing attaching and detaching an AoE block device and all was going fine until I tried to attach a device twice in a row without changing the target device. Doing so resulted

[Bug 571093] Re: [SRU] multipath + libvirtd eats away more memory over time

2010-08-26 Thread Nigel Jones
I've included the attached patch in an SRU candidate for Bug #455832, you can view the proposed debdiff there. ** Patch added: 9024-free-memory-for-invalid-devices.patch

[Bug 571093] Re: [SRU] multipath + libvirtd eats away more memory over time

2010-08-16 Thread Nigel Jones
Steve, Looks like the latest version of the patch was not applied (libvirt maintainers applied a modified patch to upstream that fixed a couple more memory leaks. This version does work, but I know others still had some lingering problems that I couldn't reproduce. The patch they are now using

[Bug 613497] [NEW] nautilus deletes new folders

2010-08-04 Thread Nigel Jones
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nautilus - Lucid Lynx 10.04 LTS - Nautilus Version Installed: 1:2.30.1-0ubuntu1.1 Candidate: 1:2.30.1-0ubuntu1.1 - After, creating a new folder, which appeared under the download folder, I expected that it would create a new folder that was

[Bug 613497] Re: nautilus deletes new folders

2010-08-04 Thread Nigel Jones
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/53049046/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/53049047/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/53049048/ProcStatus.txt ** Attachment

[Bug 613504] [NEW] maximum output volume is not reached with voume control

2010-08-04 Thread Nigel Jones
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-media - Ubuntu Lucid Lynx 10.04 LTS - I'm using the default volume control on a gnome desktop. gnome-media: Installed: 2.30.0-0ubuntu1 Candidate: 2.30.0-0ubuntu1 - I expected the volume control button to make my volume go as loud as

[Bug 613504] Re: maximum output volume is not reached with voume control

2010-08-04 Thread Nigel Jones
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/53050074/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/53050075/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/53050076/ProcStatus.txt ** Attachment

[Bug 571093] Re: [SRU] multipath + libvirtd eats away more memory over time

2010-05-25 Thread Nigel Jones
Ariel, What was the previous rate of increase? I don't personally have the hardware to reproduce the issue (looks like ocfs2 + EMC SAN based on your udev output), so could you maybe provide the following: * valgrind -v --leak-check=full --show-reachable=yes /usr/sbin/libvirtd -v (Once it's

[Bug 567701] Re: Date not updated by ntp when network interfaces started

2010-05-26 Thread Nigel Jones
Just to note, this appears to be working out of the box with current Maverick packages for me, there appears to be quite a few changes to NTP packaging as well. -- Date not updated by ntp when network interfaces started https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/567701 You received this bug notification

[Bug 585027] Re: Race condition with dmsetup causes 'map already present' messages

2010-05-26 Thread Nigel Jones
Yes, as stated in my original comment, it is reproducible (myself and Dustin Kirkland), with variants of while true; do sudo multipath -F; sudo multipath -v4 ; done. All that is required is a device that multipath will create a /dev/mapper entry for (use_friendly_names or not) and remove with -F

[Bug 1181777] Re: kvm: freeze a guest with a NIC PCI passthrough

2013-09-18 Thread Nigel Jones
After getting the bug mail for this bug and reading it with interest, I happened to run into this issue today myself and did some investigation at a seabios level. My original hit of the issue was with RHEL, but I reproduced it with the same card (Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8111/8168/8411

[Bug 1105010] Re: INFO: Task XXXX blocked for more than 120 seconds

2013-01-31 Thread Nigel Jones
Have now - enabled trim (across lvm/filesystem/crypt) since primary drive is SSD - ran full fsck (clean) - switched to 3.7.5 kernel as the hangs continued on 3.5 Note that I did get a hang with the 3.8 kernel but couldn't prove (*through logs*) it was the same hang... -- You received this

[Bug 1105010] Re: INFO: Task XXXX blocked for more than 120 seconds

2013-02-04 Thread Nigel Jones
Updated to 3.7.6 (since I noticed it out). It's possible the cleanup/trim/late kernel has resolved. Need to give it a few more days (system wasn't used over weekend) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1105010] [NEW] INFO: Task XXXX blocked for more than 120 seconds

2013-01-25 Thread Nigel Jones
Public bug reported: I'm periodically (every few days) getting a hang on my Thinkpad W500 running Ubuntu 12.10+updates whereby the system freezes for a few minutes. During this time the mouse pointer won't work, music either loops or stops Checking the kernel syslog I see the following as the

[Bug 1105010] Re: INFO: Task XXXX blocked for more than 120 seconds

2013-01-25 Thread Nigel Jones
** Attachment added: Kernel log -- not just time of latest occurance but boot etc too https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1105010/+attachment/3499876/+files/kern.log.1105010.gz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1105010] Re: INFO: Task XXXX blocked for more than 120 seconds

2013-01-25 Thread Nigel Jones
Not sure if relevant but note I'm also using LUKS full disk encription -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1105010 Title: INFO: Task blocked for more than 120 seconds To manage

[Bug 1105010] Re: INFO: Task XXXX blocked for more than 120 seconds

2013-01-28 Thread Nigel Jones
Ok. Now running with upstream kernel to see if problem still occurs. Will report back Linux jonesn-ThinkPad-W500 3.8.0-030800rc5-generic #201301251535 SMP Fri Jan 25 20:36:24 UTC 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1465980] [NEW] Keyboard activity after dim screen activated does not restore to full brightness

2015-06-17 Thread Nigel Jones
Public bug reported: In the energy saving applet on kubuntu 15.04 I have the dim screen checkbox marked (5 minutes) If I leave the computer untouched for this period of time, the screen correctly dims. However it does not restore to nornal brightness when the computer is used - ie keyboard

[Bug 1458357] Re: migrate failed invalid cpu feature invtsc

2015-07-06 Thread Nigel Jones
Just raising the same issue.. if believed different please say I'll open new. Again ubuntu 15.04 with upstream, cannot suspend - cause located to invtsc being added to the command line +invtsc after using the copy host configuration in virt-manager. I did also try changing policy to disable in

[Bug 1472500] Re: virt-manager. restore windows vm- Unknown savevm section type 5

2015-07-08 Thread Nigel Jones
Updated package to qemu after testing against the packages in https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu (2.3 debs). With these installed this bug does not occur. Note that I did remove USB controller/redirector and changed spice-vnc in order to get the vm to start since these 2.3 packages as of 8

[Bug 1472500] Re: virt-manager. restore windows vm- Unknown savevm section type 5

2015-07-08 Thread Nigel Jones
Updated package to qemu after testing against the packages in https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu (2.3 debs). With these installed this bug does not occur. Note that I did remove USB controller/redirector and changed spice-vnc in order to get the vm to start since these 2.3 packages as of 8

[Bug 1472500] Re: virt-manager. restore windows vm- Unknown savevm section type 5

2015-07-08 Thread Nigel Jones
qemu 2.3.1 appears to fix this, though see https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu-kvm/+bug/1472571 for the new problem (unrelated) it causes. There is also no supported fix for 15.04 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1472571] [NEW] libvirt reporting spice not supported in 2.3.1

2015-07-08 Thread Nigel Jones
Public bug reported: I am running Ubuntu 15.04 (not 15.10/dev). Due to another bug in qemu 2.2 I decided to try the 2.3.1 packages (from build here). I realise there is potential dependency issues and the config is likely untested. However as this could be a genuin issue, I wanted to report that

[Bug 1472571] Re: libvirt reporting spice not supported in 2.3.1

2015-07-08 Thread Nigel Jones
for reference this was the original bug which prompted me to consider trying 2.3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu/+bug/1472500 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in Ubuntu.

[Bug 1472500] Re: virt-manager. restore windows vm- Unknown savevm section type 5

2015-07-08 Thread Nigel Jones
qemu 2.3.1 appears to fix this, though see https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu-kvm/+bug/1472571 for the new problem (unrelated) it causes. There is also no supported fix for 15.04 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed

[Bug 1472571] Re: libvirt reporting spice not supported in 2.3.1

2015-07-08 Thread Nigel Jones
for reference this was the original bug which prompted me to consider trying 2.3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu/+bug/1472500 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1472571

[Bug 1472571] [NEW] libvirt reporting spice not supported in 2.3.1

2015-07-08 Thread Nigel Jones
Public bug reported: I am running Ubuntu 15.04 (not 15.10/dev). Due to another bug in qemu 2.2 I decided to try the 2.3.1 packages (from build here). I realise there is potential dependency issues and the config is likely untested. However as this could be a genuin issue, I wanted to report that

[Bug 1472500] [NEW] virt-manager. restore windows vm- Unknown savevm section type 5

2015-07-08 Thread Nigel Jones
Public bug reported: When running a windows vm under kvm, save-ing, and then restore-ing, the restore fails with Error restoring domain: internal error: process exited while connecting to monitor: Unknown savevm section type 5 2015-07-08T07:18:09.422722Z qemu-system-x86_64: load of migration

[Bug 1874250] [NEW] do-release-upgrade fails 19.10->20.04 AttributeError: 'UbuntuDistroInfo' object has no attribute 'version'

2020-04-22 Thread Nigel Jones
Public bug reported: ➜ ~ sudo do-release-upgrade -d Checking for a new Ubuntu release Get:1 Upgrade tool signature [1554 B] Get:2 Upgrade tool [1344 kB] Fetched 1346 kB in 0s (0 B/s) authenticate 'focal.tar.gz' against 'focal.tar.gz.gpg' extracting 'focal.tar.gz'

  1   2   >