[Bug 1894407] Re: linux-tools: can perf be linked against libbfd, maybe statically?
As it turns out Ubuntu *did* used to link perf statically: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/783660 So I really don't understand the objection here. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894407 Title: linux-tools: can perf be linked against libbfd, maybe statically? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1894407/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1894407] Re: linux-tools: can perf be linked against libbfd, maybe statically?
I too would very much like to see this fixed. As it stands `perf report` is unusable on large binaries on Ubuntu. Seth, I think Jay's arguments are compelling. Do you agree? If I prepared a patch, would that be helpful? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894407 Title: linux-tools: can perf be linked against libbfd, maybe statically? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1894407/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
