[Bug 1891373] Re: package chromium-browser (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attempting a removal

2020-08-25 Thread Olivier Tilloy
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1886414 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1886414 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1886414 the chromium snap takes a long time to install without visible user feedback, seems stuck -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 1888380] Re: Give better experience of migration of deb to snap

2020-08-25 Thread Olivier Tilloy
If a user installs the chromium-browser package afresh, without any existing profile, I would argue that they don't care that the browser is packaged as a snap, because they haven't used it before (not on that machine at least). Manually installing chromium-browser with apt does display messages

[Bug 1892779] Re: Browser will not play videos

2020-08-24 Thread Olivier Tilloy
** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1892779 Title: Browser will not play videos To manage notifications about this bug go

[Bug 1892727] Re: package chromium-browser (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: 新的 chromium-browser 软件包 pre-installation 脚本 子进程返回错误状态 1

2020-08-24 Thread Olivier Tilloy
This appears to be a timeout when downloading the chromium snap from the store. Can you please try again, and let us know how this goes? sudo apt install chromium-browser ** Changed in: chromium-browser (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 1892727] Re: package chromium-browser (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: 新的 chromium-browser 软件包 pre-installation 脚本 子进程返回错误状态 1

2020-08-24 Thread Olivier Tilloy
Relevant log from DpkgTerminalLog.txt: ==> Installing the chromium snap error: cannot perform the following tasks: - Download snap "chromium" (1260) from channel "stable" (received an unexpected http response code (408) when trying to download

[Bug 1888157] Re: Thunderbird 78

2020-08-24 Thread Olivier Tilloy
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thunderbird/1:78.2.0+build1-0ubuntu1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1888157 Title: Thunderbird 78 To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1892724] [NEW] Bump package epoch to 1 to ensure working upgrade path and transition to snap

2020-08-24 Thread Olivier Tilloy
: High Assignee: Olivier Tilloy (osomon) Status: Fix Committed ** Description changed: For a complete rational, see comments #4, #5, #7 and #8 in bug #1889106, and the discussion in https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu- devel/2020-August/041127.html. + + This needs

[Bug 1892724] Re: Bump package epoch to 1 to ensure working upgrade path and transition to snap

2020-08-24 Thread Olivier Tilloy
1:84.0.4147.135-0ubuntu1 uploaded to groovy. ** Changed in: chromium-browser (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1892724 Title: Bump

[Bug 1892724] Re: Bump package epoch to 1 to ensure working upgrade path and transition to snap

2020-08-24 Thread Olivier Tilloy
Quoting the ubuntu-devel@ conversation here for easier future reference: « In doing SRU reviews today, I came across LP: #1889106 which is a request for a no-change rebuild to bump the version so it beats the versions presented in previous releases. The problem is real, but it seems suboptimal

[Bug 1887144] Re: autopkgtest failures on ppc64el with nodejs 12.18.2

2020-08-24 Thread Olivier Tilloy
Tests now pass with nodejs 12.18.2~dfsg-1ubuntu2 in groovy-proposed: https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/n/node-sha.js/groovy/ppc64el https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/n/node-crypto-browserify/groovy/ppc64el

[Bug 1889106] Re: [SRU] Upgrading from 18.04 to 20.04 will keep the 18.04 chromium-browser due to a higher version than the transitional deb in 20.04

2020-08-24 Thread Olivier Tilloy
Verified working. For convenience I used a slightly different testing method than the test case in the bug description: I downloaded and installed (with `dpkg -i`) the chromium-browser, chromium-browser-l10n and chromium-codecs-ffmpeg-extra debs from

[Bug 1889106] Re: [SRU] Upgrading from 18.04 to 20.04 will keep the 18.04 chromium-browser due to a higher version than the transitional deb in 20.04

2020-08-24 Thread Olivier Tilloy
Thanks Robie for the suggestion. I hadn't thought of an epoch bump, but it sounds like a good solution to the recurring problem at hand. This is the ubuntu-devel@ discussion for reference: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2020-August/041127.html. I am going to test the package in

[Bug 1889106] Re: [SRU] Upgrading from 18.04 to 20.04 will keep the 18.04 chromium-browser due to a higher version than the transitional deb in 20.04

2020-08-07 Thread Olivier Tilloy
Thanks Łukasz. In the meantime the 84.0.4147.105 update was published to {xenial,bionic}-{security,updates}, so the version number needs bumping again, for the upgrade path to really work. I have uploaded 84.0.4147.105-0ubuntu1 to groovy-proposed, and 84.0.4147.105-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 is now in the

[Bug 1888380] Re: Give better experience of migration of deb to snap

2020-08-07 Thread Olivier Tilloy
Fixed with https://git.launchpad.net/~chromium-team/chromium- browser/+git/snap-from- source/commit/?id=9dfbfe4fd02e254354ec038a9aa3da26980b89d2. ** Changed in: chromium-browser (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Olivier Tilloy (osomon) ** Changed in: chromium-browser (Ubuntu) Sta

[Bug 1887144] Re: autopkgtest failures on ppc64el with nodejs 12.18.2

2020-08-07 Thread Olivier Tilloy
Reported as an upstream Node.js bug: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/34666 ** Description changed: Since nodejs 12.18.1 entered groovy-proposed, autopkgtests that rely on node-sha.js to compute SHA-1 hashes started failing reliably on ppc64el. This affects the following packages:

[Bug 1890787] Re: Please remove jsunit from the archive

2020-08-07 Thread Olivier Tilloy
** Description changed: From this e-mail thread: https://admin.hostpoint.ch/pipermail/enigmail- users_enigmail.net/2020-August/005691.html JSUnit hasn't been and won't be ported to Thunderbird 78. Thunderbird 78 is currently building in groovy-proposed, once it migrates (together

[Bug 1890787] [NEW] Please remove jsunit from the archive

2020-08-07 Thread Olivier Tilloy
Public bug reported: >From this e-mail thread: https://admin.hostpoint.ch/pipermail/enigmail- users_enigmail.net/2020-August/005691.html JSUnit hasn't been and won't be ported to Thunderbird 78. Thunderbird 78 is currently building in groovy-proposed, once it migrates (together with enigmail

[Bug 1886414] Re: the chromium snap takes a long time to install without visible user feedback, seems stuck

2020-08-07 Thread Olivier Tilloy
If so that kind of feedback isn't constructive, and this bug report isn't the right place for it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1886414 Title: the chromium snap takes a long time to

[Bug 1887144] Re: autopkgtest failures on ppc64el with nodejs 12.18.2

2020-08-06 Thread Olivier Tilloy
Unfortunately, that was a red herring. I rebuilt nodejs for ppc64el with that commit reverted, but it didn't help. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1887144 Title: autopkgtest failures

[Bug 1886414] Re: the chromium snap takes a long time to install without visible user feedback, seems stuck

2020-08-06 Thread Olivier Tilloy
Sorry, I'm not sure what you mean with that last comment. Can you please elaborate? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1886414 Title: the chromium snap takes a long time to install

[Bug 1887144] Re: autopkgtest failures on ppc64el with nodejs 12.18.2

2020-08-06 Thread Olivier Tilloy
Just a wild guess that will need testing: https://chromium- review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1649711 might be related, would reverting it help? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1887144

[Bug 1887144] Re: autopkgtest failures on ppc64el with nodejs 12.18.2

2020-08-06 Thread Olivier Tilloy
(note that I'm not suggesting the above as a workaround, we need to dig deeper and understand where this incorrect optimization comes from) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1887144

[Bug 1887144] Re: autopkgtest failures on ppc64el with nodejs 12.18.2

2020-08-06 Thread Olivier Tilloy
To further prove the point, adding `eval('')` to the body of ft() ensures that the function is not optimized by V8, and the tests reliably pass. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1887144

[Bug 1887144] Re: autopkgtest failures on ppc64el with nodejs 12.18.2

2020-08-06 Thread Olivier Tilloy
** Summary changed: - autopkgtest failures on ppc64el with nodejs 12.18.1 + autopkgtest failures on ppc64el with nodejs 12.18.2 ** Also affects: nodejs (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1887144] Re: autopkgtest failures on ppc64el with nodejs 12.18.1

2020-08-06 Thread Olivier Tilloy
Some progress: running one of the failing tests through nodejs with the --no-opt flag (for no optimizations) makes it consistently pass. It looks like V8 is optimizing too aggressively, and incorrectly. I can observe that when values start diverging, ft() is being called with s===2, and despite

[Bug 1887144] Re: autopkgtest failures on ppc64el with nodejs 12.18.1

2020-08-06 Thread Olivier Tilloy
Some notes while I continue investigating the problem: - while I used the last test in test/test.js to highlight the problem, it isn't the only one that is failing - both sha.js and sha1.js are affected (unsurprisingly, as they have very similar implementations), other algorithms (sha224,

[Bug 1860830] Re: Geolocation not working − the Google maps API always returns error codes

2020-08-06 Thread Olivier Tilloy
As pointed out by Evangelos in https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/chromium-packagers/c/ZytNtRam5II/m/4o9ql5IaAwAJ?pli=1, geolocation started working again on July 29th. Marking the bug fixed accordingly, let's hope this doesn't break unexpectedly again. ** Changed in: chromium-browser

[Bug 1890321] Re: package chromium-browser 83.0.4103.97-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attempting a removal

2020-08-05 Thread Olivier Tilloy
Can you try re-installing the package, and let us know how this goes? sudo apt reinstall chromium-browser ** Changed in: chromium-browser (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1890446] Re: package firefox 78.0.1+build1-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: new firefox package pre-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 127

2020-08-05 Thread Olivier Tilloy
Relevant excerpt from DpkgTerminalLog.txt: Preparing to unpack .../19-firefox_79.0+build1-0ubuntu0.20.04.1_amd64.deb ... /var/lib/dpkg/tmp.ci/preinst: 1: awk: Too many levels of symbolic links Exception ignored in: <_io.TextIOWrapper name='' mode='w' encoding='utf-8'> BrokenPipeError: [Errno 32]

[Bug 1890446] Re: package firefox 78.0.1+build1-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: new firefox package pre-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 127

2020-08-05 Thread Olivier Tilloy
Can you try running the following command in a terminal, and let us know how it goes? sudo apt reinstall firefox ** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1890365] Re: Web Serial fails to access local device

2020-08-05 Thread Olivier Tilloy
This is most likely the snap strict confinement that prevents communication with the serial device. Can you please run the following command in a terminal, then run chromium and reproduce the problem, and share the output of the terminal here? journalctl -f | grep chromium ** Changed in:

[Bug 1890049] Re: global menu bar no longer supported after 20.04 upgrade

2020-08-05 Thread Olivier Tilloy
Although the absence of a global menubar in GNOME by default did influence this particular decision, the main factor was the increasing difficulty to maintain the firefox patch that enabled the feature. The patch was quite large (several thousands LOC) and heavily relied on internal APIs that have

[Bug 1890319] Re: Please remove tinyjsd from the archive

2020-08-04 Thread Olivier Tilloy
Yes, this would need to be removal + sync blacklist for groovy, to be on the safe side (although it's unlikely that Debian would ever upload a new version). I think it's OK for the package to be broken in focal. No one has ever complained thus far, so my guess is that no-one uses it. -- You

[Bug 1890319] [NEW] Please remove tinyjsd from the archive

2020-08-04 Thread Olivier Tilloy
Public bug reported: >From https://sourceforge.net/u/pbrunschwig/tinyjsd/wiki/Home/: « Note: due to the massive and rapid changes in the Mozilla Platform, TinyJSD is no longer actively maintained. The last version supports Thunderbird 60/SeaMonkey 2.57. We recommend to use the standard

[Bug 1864001] Re: Dialog windows of Chromium with unprintable characters

2020-08-03 Thread Olivier Tilloy
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1877109 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1877109 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1864365 [snap] Dialog font missing ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1877109 incompatible host fonts cache causing snap app instability --

[Bug 1864365] Re: [snap] Dialog font missing

2020-08-03 Thread Olivier Tilloy
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1877109 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1877109 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1877109 incompatible host fonts cache causing snap app instability -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1887144] Re: autopkgtest failures on ppc64el with nodejs 12.18.1

2020-08-03 Thread Olivier Tilloy
Unfortunately no, the patch doesn't affect the outcome of tests on ppc64el (I did try reverting it, and the problem has also been reported upstream, which doesn't carry the patch). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1887433] Re: Print dialog from Thunderbird appears behing thunderbird window

2020-08-03 Thread Olivier Tilloy
** Changed in: thunderbird (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1887433 Title: Print dialog from Thunderbird appears behing thunderbird window To

[Bug 1890049] Re: global menu bar no longer supported after 20.04 upgrade

2020-08-03 Thread Olivier Tilloy
While we appreciate this is effectively a functional regression, it is intended. Exposing firefox's menus to the global menu bar involved a non-trivial distro patch that was increasingly difficult to maintain (because it relied on many internal APIs), so it was dropped before 20.04 (see

[Bug 1890148] Re: Thunderbird outdated

2020-08-03 Thread Olivier Tilloy
** Changed in: thunderbird (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: thunderbird (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1890148

[Bug 1890148] Re: Thunderbird outdated

2020-08-03 Thread Olivier Tilloy
While the 68.x series isn't the current series (78.x is), it is still officially supported, with point releases for security fixes. We are working on updating thunderbird to the 78.x series in Ubuntu, and it will be backported to 20.04 in due course. It is fair to assume that unless it's a

[Bug 1887144] Re: autopkgtest failures on ppc64el with nodejs 12.18.1

2020-07-31 Thread Olivier Tilloy
(the above comment applies to the last test in test/test.js with the label "call digest for more than MAX_UINT32 bits of data". -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1887144 Title:

[Bug 1887144] Re: autopkgtest failures on ppc64el with nodejs 12.18.1

2020-07-31 Thread Olivier Tilloy
Added some logging to the Sha1._update() method which is called repeatedly, and the problem doesn't appear to be deterministic: it doesn't always start diverging at the same place (although it's always early, within the first 100 iterations). -- You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 1887144] Re: autopkgtest failures on ppc64el with nodejs 12.18.1

2020-07-30 Thread Olivier Tilloy
** Description changed: Since nodejs 12.18.1 entered groovy-proposed, autopkgtests that rely on - node-sha to compute SHA-1 hashes started failing reliably on ppc64el. + node-sha.js to compute SHA-1 hashes started failing reliably on ppc64el. This affects the following packages:   -

[Bug 1887804] Re: chromium-browser does not follow XDG base directory specification

2020-07-30 Thread Olivier Tilloy
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1575053 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1575053 > `$XDG_CONFIG_HOME/$SOFTWARE_NAME` is the de facto way That's different from "does not follow the XDG base directory specification". A specification (hopefully) is unambiguous. Anything else has little

[Bug 1887970] Re: Core dump

2020-07-30 Thread Olivier Tilloy
The update to version 84 is in progress, but as I wrote earlier it's targetting 16.04 and 18.04 only. You may try to run the 18.04 packages on 20.04, but there's no guarantee it will run at all. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1884759] Re: U2f yubikey stopped working in chromium snap

2020-07-30 Thread Olivier Tilloy
The plot thickens. Can you reliably reproduce this situation, where unplugging and plugging again the 5C makes it work, but it doesn't after a reboot? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1887804] Re: chromium-browser does not follow XDG base directory specification

2020-07-30 Thread Olivier Tilloy
I don't think the specification¹ mandates how folders should be structured under $XDG_DATA_HOME and $XDG_CONFIG_HOME. Or is there a follow-up specification that does that? Hopefully snapd behaves (mostly) the same on all supported distributions, so distro-hopping shouldn't be a concern either.

[Bug 1887970] Re: Core dump

2020-07-30 Thread Olivier Tilloy
There are chromium-browser deb packages with debug symbols (chromium- browser-dbgsym) published in the Ubuntu archive for Ubuntu 16.04 and 18.04. In newer Ubuntu releases the deb is a wrapper that installs the chromium snap. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 1889517] Re: url- and searchbar not working after upgrade to 79.0

2020-07-30 Thread Olivier Tilloy
Additionally to what Sébastien requested, can you do the following: Open firefox, then press the keyboard shortcut Ctrl+Shift+J. This should open the browser console. Select everything, copy and paste it here in a comment, or as an attachment if there is a lot of content. Thanks in advance. --

[Bug 1888942] Re: marked url in firefox by using one click isn't copied to clipboard, only with a triple mouse-click

2020-07-29 Thread Olivier Tilloy
** Also affects: firefox via https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1656045 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1888942 Title:

[Bug 1866880] Re: Firefox Speech Synthesis Not Working in Kubuntu By Default

2020-07-29 Thread Olivier Tilloy
** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1866880 Title: Firefox Speech Synthesis Not Working in Kubuntu By Default To

[Bug 1867402] Re: [snap] Icons in file picker are corrupted

2020-07-29 Thread Olivier Tilloy
Does the following command appear to fix the problem (after restarting chromium)? rm -rf ~/snap/chromium/common/.cache -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1867402 Title: [snap] Icons

[Bug 1888942] Re: marked url in firefox by using one click isn't copied to clipboard, only with a triple mouse-click

2020-07-29 Thread Olivier Tilloy
This behaviour looks intentional to me. Can you please file an upstream bug report at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/enter_bug.cgi#h=dupes%7CFirefox, and share the link to it here? Thanks! ** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 1884759] Re: U2f yubikey stopped working in chromium snap

2020-07-29 Thread Olivier Tilloy
Can you share the last few lines of `dmesg` after plugging in your yubikey, to get more information about the device? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1884759 Title: U2f yubikey

[Bug 1888674] Re: chromium doesn't launch when using --user-data-dir

2020-07-29 Thread Olivier Tilloy
Please see my comment on bug #1887396: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium- browser/+bug/1887396/comments/6. Try moving your profile folders over to the common directory, which is unversioned. Hopefully this helps. ** Changed in: chromium-browser (Ubuntu) Status: New =>

[Bug 1887396] Re: chromium-browser doesn't start

2020-07-29 Thread Olivier Tilloy
Indeed, the code to import an existing profile isn't multi-profile aware, it will only import a profile in the default location. Contributions to improve this are welcome (the code is there: https://git.launchpad.net/~chromium-team/chromium-browser/+git/snap-

[Bug 1887793] Re: [snap] chromium unable to launch

2020-07-29 Thread Olivier Tilloy
Yes, that looks like the same issue indeed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1887793 Title: [snap] chromium unable to launch To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1887804] Re: chromium-browser does not follow XDG base directory specification

2020-07-29 Thread Olivier Tilloy
> That's still incorrect. How so? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1887804 Title: chromium-browser does not follow XDG base directory specification To manage notifications about this

[Bug 1887970] Re: Core dump

2020-07-29 Thread Olivier Tilloy
See my comment on the upstream bug report: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1106509#c21 I'm unable to reproduce the crash locally, unfortunately. Let's keep this bug open, and continue the conversation on the upstream bug report, which has more useful data and input from

[Bug 1887804] Re: chromium-browser does not follow XDG base directory specification

2020-07-29 Thread Olivier Tilloy
Thanks for the upstream bug, I'll be following it closely. Regarding the other half of the problem (XDG base directory specification compliance), bug #1575053 does say this in its description: Therefore snap packages should base the value of SNAP_USER_DATA on the value of XDG_DATA_HOME (or

[Bug 1887684] Re: package chromium-browser (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: new chromium-browser package pre-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

2020-07-29 Thread Olivier Tilloy
>From the contents of DpkgTerminalLog.txt, it looks like you interrupted the >installation. The chromium-browser package is now a transitional package that installs the chromium snap, which might take some time depending on your internet connection and on the snap store CDN. Since the snap is

[Bug 1864365] Re: [snap] Dialog font missing

2020-07-29 Thread Olivier Tilloy
Thanks for the feedback Steven. I'm tentatively marking the bug fixed. Feel free to re-open it if the issue happens again. ** Changed in: chromium-browser (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1887433] Re: Print dialog from Thunderbird appears behing thunderbird window

2020-07-29 Thread Olivier Tilloy
Just tested in a fully up-to-date Kubuntu 20.04 VM (amd64), and I cannot observe the problem. Printing an e-mail does pop up the print dialog in front of the thunderbird window. Can you share the exact steps you're taking to reproduce the problem? Can you maybe attach a screencast demonstrating

[Bug 1881448] Re: package chromium-browser (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: new chromium-browser package pre-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

2020-07-29 Thread Olivier Tilloy
This looks like an intermittent failure. Relevant log from DpkgTerminalLog.txt: ==> Installing the chromium snap error: cannot perform the following tasks: - Download snap "chromium" (1165) from channel "stable" (unexpected EOF) Can you please try to reinstall and let us know how it goes:

[Bug 1791761] Re: No mail retrieving from a local popa3d server with thunderbird 1.52.9.1

2020-07-29 Thread Olivier Tilloy
@mpaq: sorry for the lack of feedback when you originally reported the problem. Are you still seeing it with the latest thunderbird update on a supported release of Ubuntu? ** Changed in: thunderbird (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 1887132] Re: package chromium-browser 81.0.4044.138-0ubuntu0.18.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: new chromium-browser package pre-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 10

2020-07-29 Thread Olivier Tilloy
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1875841 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1875841 This looks like an intermittent problem, whereby the chromium snap was already being installed. Can you try reinstalling chromium-browser? sudo apt install --reinstall chromium-browser and share the

[Bug 1884759] Re: U2f yubikey stopped working in chromium snap

2020-07-29 Thread Olivier Tilloy
Sorry for the lack of feedback Alexey. I have just tested with my Yubikey 4, using https://demo.yubico.com/playground, and U2F appears to work as expected. Are you still seeing the problem with the latest chromium snap? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 1889106] Re: [SRU] Upgrading from 18.04 to 20.04 will keep the 18.04 chromium-browser due to a higher version than the transitional deb in 20.04

2020-07-27 Thread Olivier Tilloy
** Summary changed: - Upgrading from 18.04 to 20.04 will keep the 18.04 chromium-browser due to a higher version than the transitional deb in 20.04 + [SRU] Upgrading from 18.04 to 20.04 will keep the 18.04 chromium-browser due to a higher version than the transitional deb in 20.04 -- You

[Bug 1889106] [NEW] [SRU] Upgrading from 18.04 to 20.04 will keep the 18.04 chromium-browser due to a higher version than the transitional deb in 20.04

2020-07-27 Thread Olivier Tilloy
package, they are being tracked at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium- browser/+bugs?field.tag=snap. Auto-upgrading users from the deb to the snap is the desired behaviour though. ** Affects: chromium-browser (Ubuntu) Importance: High Assignee: Olivier Tilloy (osomon

[Bug 1881751] Re: Chromium 83 on xenial − consistent renderer crash when playing back video

2020-07-23 Thread Olivier Tilloy
Fixed with https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~chromium-team/chromium-browser /xenial-stable/revision/1484. ** Changed in: chromium-browser (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1881751] Re: Chromium 83 on xenial − consistent renderer crash when playing back video

2020-07-23 Thread Olivier Tilloy
This upstream commit fixes the crash: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/5fc11d04896442c8941ca0afba364a4d641c926e -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1881751 Title: Chromium

[Bug 1888380] Re: Give better experience of migration of deb to snap

2020-07-21 Thread Olivier Tilloy
** Tags added: snap -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1888380 Title: Give better experience of migration of deb to snap To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1816497] Re: [snap] vaapi chromium no video hardware decoding

2020-07-20 Thread Olivier Tilloy
Mojo is the decoder you want for hardware-accelerated video decoding. So you're good with H264. As for VP9 and AV1, I suppose your GPU doesn't support those? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1816497] Re: [snap] vaapi chromium no video hardware decoding

2020-07-20 Thread Olivier Tilloy
That's great news Liz! What does chrome://media-internals report as the video decoder when watching H264 videos? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1816497 Title: [snap] vaapi chromium

[Bug 1881923] Re: No icons in file picker

2020-07-20 Thread Olivier Tilloy
Unfortunately that command shows only very recent changes, and there doesn't appear to be a switch to make it show older changes. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1881923 Title: No

[Bug 1816497] Re: [snap] vaapi chromium no video hardware decoding

2020-07-20 Thread Olivier Tilloy
Thanks for testing and the feedback Liz. The version of mesa-va-drivers in the snap is the one from bionic- updates (20.0.8-0ubuntu1~18.04.1), as confirmed from the build log and by comparing checksums after unpacking the snap. What's the output of `LIBVA_MESSAGING_LEVEL=2 snap run chromium` ?

[Bug 1888157] Re: Thunderbird 78

2020-07-20 Thread Olivier Tilloy
** Changed in: thunderbird (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Olivier Tilloy (osomon) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1888157 Title: Thunderbird 78 To manage notifications ab

[Bug 1887793] Re: [snap] chromium unable to launch

2020-07-20 Thread Olivier Tilloy
Unfortunately if you have to manually delete some caches it's not a proper fix, merely a workaround. I'm glad it solved the problem for you, but let's keep this bug open to track the issue and hopefully get to the bottom of it. ** Changed in: chromium-browser (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete =>

[Bug 1879742] Re: When using Google Meet on Firefox, delay sending sound from microphone

2020-07-19 Thread Olivier Tilloy
** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1879742 Title: When using Google Meet on Firefox, delay sending sound from

[Bug 1816497] Re: [snap] vaapi chromium no video hardware decoding

2020-07-17 Thread Olivier Tilloy
https://git.launchpad.net/~chromium-team/chromium-browser/+git/snap- from-source/commit/?id=ff07991f41f89a21355b6e1c77a4db4393321d47 hopefully fixes it -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1816497] Re: [snap] vaapi chromium no video hardware decoding

2020-07-17 Thread Olivier Tilloy
Tentative fix to enable building on !amd64: https://git.launchpad.net /~chromium-team/chromium-browser/+git/snap-from- source/commit/?id=d8f8bf958810e0b48a1dd9e480fbe2def7e8f9f1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1881923] Re: No icons in file picker

2020-07-17 Thread Olivier Tilloy
Can you please share the output of the following command? snap changes --abs-time chromium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1881923 Title: No icons in file picker To manage

[Bug 1887804] Re: chromium-browser does not follow XDG base directory specification

2020-07-17 Thread Olivier Tilloy
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1575053 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1575053 Please do not confirm your own bugs. > Change the folder it's confined to. As I explained earlier it's a security feature implemented by snapd, the chromium snap doesn't get to choose where its data is

[Bug 1887793] Re: [snap] chromium unable to launch

2020-07-17 Thread Olivier Tilloy
Thanks Mattias. Could you also try the suggested workaround at https://forum.snapcraft.io/t/chromium-snap-kernel-has-no-file- descriptor-comparison-support-operation-not-permitted/18921/2 and let us know whether this "fixes" the problem for you too? -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 1887793] Re: [snap] chromium unable to launch

2020-07-17 Thread Olivier Tilloy
** Summary changed: - chromium unable to launch + [snap] chromium unable to launch ** Tags added: snap -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1887793 Title: [snap] chromium unable to

[Bug 1887795] Re: snap "chromium" has bad plugs or slots: system-packages-doc

2020-07-17 Thread Olivier Tilloy
Not released until in the stable channel. ** Changed in: chromium-browser (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released => Fix Committed ** Tags added: snap -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1873996] Re: DevTools does not open at 84.0.4115.5

2020-07-16 Thread Olivier Tilloy
** Changed in: chromium-browser (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1873996 Title: DevTools does not open at 84.0.4115.5 To manage

[Bug 1849162] Re: Lightning extension should be installed and enabled by default

2020-07-16 Thread Olivier Tilloy
The upcoming update to thunderbird 78 will have the calendar features of lightning integrated, thus fixing this bug. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1849162 Title: Lightning extension

[Bug 1887804] Re: chromium-browser does not follow XDG base directory specification

2020-07-16 Thread Olivier Tilloy
The chromium snap is strictly confined, and that means that it cannot read/write to hidden directories inside the user's home folder (such as $HOME/.config or $HOME/.cache). That's a security feature to prevent snap applications from reading other applications' data. Instead, as you've found out,

[Bug 1887793] Re: chromium unable to launch

2020-07-16 Thread Olivier Tilloy
Can you please refresh again to revision 1229 and run the snap with the following command, and share the output? chromium --enable-logging=stderr --v=1 ** Changed in: chromium-browser (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 1887795] Re: snap "chromium" has bad plugs or slots: system-packages-doc

2020-07-16 Thread Olivier Tilloy
When I added that plug I was told by the snapd team that unknown/not- available-yet interfaces would be silently ignored. It turns out silence is a loud and scary warning. I'll revert the addition of the plug for now, until snapd 2.46 is available. -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 1887795] Re: snap "chromium" has bad plugs or slots: system-packages-doc

2020-07-16 Thread Olivier Tilloy
(note that snapd in the edge channel does have the interface) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1887795 Title: snap "chromium" has bad plugs or slots: system-packages-doc To manage

[Bug 1887795] Re: snap "chromium" has bad plugs or slots: system-packages-doc

2020-07-16 Thread Olivier Tilloy
https://git.launchpad.net/~chromium-team/chromium-browser/+git/snap- from-source/commit/?id=91e623624e3cca87bbadfa7db567059d6b8b1ef8 ** Changed in: chromium-browser (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 1854091] Re: [snap] traps on start

2020-07-15 Thread Olivier Tilloy
** Changed in: chromium-browser (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1854091 Title: [snap] traps on start To manage notifications about this bug go

[Bug 1887201] Re: [snap] web bluetooth does not work

2020-07-15 Thread Olivier Tilloy
The plug has been added to all channels, the next builds will have it (I'm about to push new builds to the edge channel for chromium 85.0.4183.26). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1887201] Re: [snap] web bluetooth does not work

2020-07-15 Thread Olivier Tilloy
Thanks David. The updated snap with the bluez plug is now in the stable channel (for amd64, other architectures will follow shortly), so I'm marking this bug fixed. Let's follow up on the auto-connection topic on the snapcraft forum. ** Changed in: chromium-browser (Ubuntu) Status: Fix

[Bug 1887201] Re: [snap] web bluetooth does not work

2020-07-15 Thread Olivier Tilloy
Thanks David, your contribution is much appreciated. I talked to the forum admins, and I've been told you should now be able to post your original auto-connection request without limitations. Can you please try again? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1877593] Re: [snap] Needlessly cats ~/.chromium-browser.init

2020-07-15 Thread Olivier Tilloy
** Changed in: chromium-browser (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1877593 Title: [snap] Needlessly cats ~/.chromium-browser.init

[Bug 1851895] Re: [snap] No access to HTML documentation in /usr/share/doc

2020-07-15 Thread Olivier Tilloy
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1875860 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1875860 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1875860 local documentation is not accessible from the chromium snap -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >