[Bug 1882993] Re: Package needs newer version with v2 encryption policy

2022-02-03 Thread Redsandro
Be advised that this package is provided by the Debian Go Packaging Team. https://go-team.pages.debian.net The Go-Team does not use Launchpad. In stead, the package is tracked over at Debian: https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/fscrypt I did not know this at the time I opened this request.

[Bug 1835660] Re: initramfs unpacking failed

2020-07-31 Thread Redsandro
Confirmed on Linux 5.4.0-42-generic with Linux Mint 20 (Ubuntu 20.04) clean install. Changing lz4 to gzip in /etc/initramfs-tools/initramfs.conf removed the error (after doing sudo update-initramfs -u) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1842417] Re: Ubiquity needs support for fscrypt

2020-07-29 Thread Redsandro
Note that the above was added in fscrypt 0.2.6 (january 2020), and it is described here: https://github.com/google/fscrypt/pull/167 Ubuntu still packages 0.2.5 (september 2019) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1842417] Re: Ubiquity needs support for fscrypt

2020-07-29 Thread Redsandro
> I think some problem has to be considered: as far as I understood, the folder > /.fscrypt shall not be deleted (risk to loose access to your data?) > if yes, it's a bit risky in case you re-install system on / with a separated > encrypted /home that you want to keep. When you set up your

[Bug 1842417] Re: Consider reintroducing home encryption using fscrypt

2020-07-26 Thread Redsandro
Please give this issue some love too: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fscrypt/+bug/1882993 ** Description changed: Home encryption using ecryptfs was removed in Ubuntu 18.04 for reasons. - Full disk encryption was recommended as an alternative. + Full disk encryption was recommended

[Bug 1882993] Re: Package needs newer version with v2 encryption policy

2020-07-26 Thread Redsandro
It's time to package fscrypt 0.2.9. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1882993 Title: Package needs newer version with v2 encryption policy To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1882993] [NEW] Package needs newer version with v2 encryption policy

2020-06-10 Thread Redsandro
Public bug reported: The latest packaged version is fscrypt v0.2.5, which is almost a year old. Since then, some serious limitations have been addressed that depend on the 5.4 kernel. https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/filesystems/fscrypt.html The v2 encryption policy allows for some

[Bug 1859592] Re: Bluetooth unavailable after updates - Reading Intel version information failed (-110)

2020-04-18 Thread Redsandro
@vicamo any cold boot, right? Not specifically after having this error? For the moment I'm working at home because of reasons, but one of these weeks I'll be at the office (computer) again. But the error itself is pretty rare. I'm also encouraging @mizzao to `apport-collect 1859592` -- You

[Bug 1859592] Re: Bluetooth unavailable after updates - Reading Intel version information failed (-110)

2020-04-17 Thread Redsandro
@mizzao that sounds a lot like my "solution" comments/2 indeed. However, during hot reboots on my dual boot setup, the Bluetooth DID work in Windows for me, but not in Linux. For Linux, a cold boot was required. So I am inclined to believe that the Linux Bluetooth driver puts the Bluetooth

[Bug 1859592] Re: Bluetooth unavailable after updates - Reading Intel version information failed (-110)

2020-01-14 Thread Redsandro
I read from previous bugs and forums on the internet that people seem to think this is BIOS _update_ related. Things don't just break from one day to the next because you suddenly need a firmware update. I tried a couple of things like going to BIOS and loading default settings. Save. Reboot. No

[Bug 1824703] Re: Intel 8260 Bluetooth non-functioning, command timeouts

2020-01-14 Thread Redsandro
Since this bug is now Invalid, I've opened new bug 1859592. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1824703 Title: Intel 8260 Bluetooth non-functioning, command timeouts To manage

[Bug 1859592] [NEW] Bluetooth unavailable after updates - Reading Intel version information failed (-110)

2020-01-14 Thread Redsandro
Public bug reported: After 10 days of uptime with automatic updates, I rebooted. Bluetooth, which I use every day, is no longer available. $ dmesg | grep -i bluetooth [4.846072] Bluetooth: Core ver 2.22 [4.846088] Bluetooth: HCI device and connection manager initialized [4.846092]

[Bug 1842417] [NEW] Consider reintroducing home encryption using fscrypt

2019-09-03 Thread Redsandro
Public bug reported: Home encryption using ecryptfs was removed in Ubuntu 18.04 for reasons. Full disk encryption was recommended as an alternative. Not everyone agrees that encrypting the entire disk is the best alternative. Some prefer a more lightweight solution. Others have families and like

[Bug 1768340] Re: fscrypt does not work for home directory encryption

2019-07-14 Thread Redsandro
Be advised that it is dangerous to use fscrypt without umask 077, as any user can read the contents of any file you access even if they don't have the security token. https://github.com/google/fscrypt/issues/132 ** Bug watch added: github.com/google/fscrypt/issues #132

[Bug 1768230] Re: Long time booting : Failed to connect to lvmetad. Falling back to device scanning.

2019-07-12 Thread Redsandro
I'm experiencing this on Linux Mint 19.1 fully updated and NOT encrypted disk or home. This is an LVM install though. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1768230 Title: Long time booting

[Bug 1768340] Re: fscrypt does not work for home directory encryption

2019-05-05 Thread Redsandro
The method described by @tlbdk works on Ubuntu 19.04. I'd like to get this working on a series of Ubuntu 18.04.2 LTS machines. But the packages are at 0.2.2 rather than 0.2.4. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1744935] Re: [i915] Display Corruption

2018-08-23 Thread Redsandro
Had this too, for the first time, on Ubuntu 18.04 LTS. [287327.941338] [drm] Reducing the compressed framebuffer size. This may lead to less power savings than a non-reduced-size. Try to increase stolen memory size if available in BIOS. [287336.517202] [drm] Reducing the compressed framebuffer

[Bug 1768340] Re: fscrypt does not work for home directory encryption

2018-08-09 Thread Redsandro
Ubuntu 18.04.1 is released., This issue is not fixed, not addressed, not acknowledged as being an issue by key developers, and no plans to do this in the future were announced. We have migrated our computers to Linux Mint 19 Tara, which (still) supports ecryptfs home encryption. The one drawback

[Bug 1335093] Re: chromium-browser closes/crashes on "Save image as..."

2018-07-29 Thread Redsandro
It was not a one time issue; it was present for about 6 months. However, at some point it disappeared. Thank you for responding. This bug can now be closed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1743479] Re: [138a:0097] Validity sensor driver request

2018-07-25 Thread Redsandro
I second that. For Ubuntu 18.04 LTS. Same hardware on Lenovo X1 Yoga. Resources: https://certification.ubuntu.com/catalog/component/usb/4222/138a%3A0097/ https://github.com/nmikhailov/Validity90#status https://github.com/hrenod/libfprint#validity-sensor-138a0097-libfprint-driver -- You

[Bug 1726873] Re: mount.ecryptfs_private can't mount in 17.10

2018-07-20 Thread Redsandro
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1718658 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1718658 Oops sorry, I missed the duplicate warning! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1726873 Title:

[Bug 1718658] Re: ecryptfs-mount-private fails to initialize ecryptfs keys

2018-07-20 Thread Redsandro
#26 fixed this for me. Doing a manual mount like so (used for safely storing private data in the cloud) used to work since Ubuntu 12 or so. However, today after updating from Ubuntu 16.04 LTS to 18.04 LTS, the entire thing wouldn't mount anymore: ``` $ echo mypassphrase | sudo

[Bug 1726873] Re: mount.ecryptfs_private can't mount in 17.10

2018-07-20 Thread Redsandro
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1718658 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1718658 Doing a manual mount like so (used for safely storing private data in the cloud) used to work since Ubuntu 12 or so. However, today after updating from Ubuntu 16.04 LTS to 18.04 LTS, the entire thing

[Bug 1756840] Re: Buggy, under-maintained, not fit for main anymore; alternatives exist

2018-06-07 Thread Redsandro
@Seth-Arnold I don't think your comment is relevant to the problem. Let expand on @savvdm Dmitry's comment, for I feel that a couple of balls were dropped, too. Some of us have caught the habit of using a separate /home partition from the early days for the convenience of data-, settings-, and

[Bug 1768340] Re: fscrypt does not work for home directory encryption

2018-05-03 Thread Redsandro
So we cannot encrypt our home directory the old way in Ubuntu 18.04, and we cannot encrypt home the new (fscrypt) way as adviced in the release notes. Not everyone agrees that encrypting the entire disk is the best choice. Industrial progress has increased battery life and decreased power usage,

[Bug 1762468] Re: Cryptoswap not working in Bionic

2018-05-02 Thread Redsandro
-update- https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ecryptfs-utils/+bug/1310058 that is. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1762468 Title: Cryptoswap not working in Bionic To manage

[Bug 1762468] Re: Cryptoswap not working in Bionic

2018-05-02 Thread Redsandro
At the risk of saying something completely unrelated; any change this is a regression of #1310058 where the UUID got overwritten? It came back a few times around 2015, leading me to believe that the devs don't actually use this method, and might not test for this scenario, making a regression

[Bug 1734518] [NEW] acpi-call-dkms fails to build on HWE kernel

2017-11-26 Thread Redsandro
Public bug reported: While provisioning a brand new laptop, I found that I cannot install `acpi-call-dkms`. 1) Ubuntu 16.04.3 2) acpi-call-dkms 1.1.0-2 ``` $ sudo apt install acpi-call-dkms Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The

[Bug 1682410] Re: ecryptfs-utils not working properly with linux kernel 4.8.0-41-generic

2017-09-02 Thread Redsandro
such file or directory ls: cannot access 'Work': No such file or directory total 12K drwxr-x--- 5 redsandro redsandro 4.0K Mar 31 15:54 ./ drwxr-xr-x 7 redsandro redsandro 4.0K Apr 13 13:24 ../ d? ? ? ? ?? Contracts/ d? ? ? ? ??

[Bug 1682410] Re: ecryptfs-utils not working properly with linux kernel 4.8.0-41-generic

2017-09-01 Thread Redsandro
I think the problem only exists for unencrypted filenames that would previously pass (by default or) by passing the ecryptfs_passthrough option. Unencrypted filenames work as expected on kernels <=4.4, but are inaccessable and listed as in kernels >=4.8. I've tried the mount option

[Bug 1682410] Re: ecryptfs-utils not working properly with linux kernel 4.8.0-41-generic

2017-09-01 Thread Redsandro
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Expired => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1682410 Title: ecryptfs-utils not working properly with linux kernel 4.8.0-41-generic To

[Bug 1682410] Re: ecryptfs-utils not working properly with linux kernel 4.8.0-41-generic

2017-09-01 Thread Redsandro
@jsalisbury I tried kernel 4.12.0 and the problem exists. Can we re-open this? Something clearly changed between 4.4 and 4.8. And it's not fixed in 4.10 or 4.12. Does someone know what is going on? Using the same mount options, only kernel 4.4.0 and lower will mount the ecryptfs share. Newer

[Bug 1682410] Re: ecryptfs-utils not working properly with linux kernel 4.8.0-41-generic

2017-09-01 Thread Redsandro
INTERESTING: In the new kernels, you can still write new files and read them. You cannot read files written in 'old' kernels. But when booting the old kernel, you can read ALL files, including the one written using the newer kernel! Booting back in 4.8, 4.10 or 4.12, and again you can only read

[Bug 1712182] [NEW] GPD Pocket crash on 1st install

2017-08-21 Thread Redsandro
Public bug reported: Unboxed my GPD Pocket, autostarting Ubuntu installer. Crash after inputting data. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04 Package: ubiquity 2.21.63.2 Uname: Linux 4.12.0-rc2+ x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.1 Architecture: amd64 Date: Mon Aug 21 21:33:32 2017

[Bug 1682410] Re: ecryptfs-utils not working properly with linux kernel 4.8.0-41-generic

2017-07-20 Thread Redsandro
Latest I tried was linux 4.10.0-26.30 through the hwe-edge package. ecryptfs still didn't mount properly. I switched back to 4.4.0. Ecryptfs works fine again. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1682410] Re: ecryptfs-utils not working properly with linux kernel 4.8.0-41-generic

2017-04-18 Thread Redsandro
(Update: 4.10.0.14.11 does not fix the problem) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1682410 Title: ecryptfs-utils not working properly with linux kernel 4.8.0-41-generic To manage

[Bug 1682410] Re: ecryptfs-utils not working properly with linux kernel 4.8.0-41-generic

2017-04-18 Thread Redsandro
@jsalisbury is there a packaged way that takes into account drivers and virtualbox dkms builds? I'm trying out linux-generic-hwe-16.04-edge (version 4.10.0.14.11) now. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1682410] Re: ecryptfs-utils not working properly with linux kernel 4.8.0-41-generic

2017-04-18 Thread Redsandro
Hi @jsalisbury, absolutely. Please wait until I have access to said laptop. I will get back to this. @brad-figg I'm sorry, I've analized the logfile and decided there's too much seemingly irrelevant private information. Be more specific and I will supply more details. -- You received this bug

[Bug 1682410] Re: ecryptfs-utils not working properly with linux kernel 4.8.0-41-generic

2017-04-13 Thread Redsandro
Additional info. Upgraded machine: $ uname -a Linux myLaptop 4.8.0-41-generic #44~16.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Fri Mar 3 17:11:16 UTC 2017 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Working machine: $ uname -a Linux myDesktop 4.4.0-53-generic #74-Ubuntu SMP Fri Dec 2 15:59:10 UTC 2016 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64

[Bug 1682410] [NEW] ecryptfs-utils not working properly with linux kernel 4.8.0-41-generic

2017-04-13 Thread Redsandro
drwxr-x--- 5 redsandro redsandro 4.0K Mar 31 15:54 ./ drwxr-xr-x 7 redsandro redsandro 4.0K Apr 13 13:24 ../ d? ? ? ? ?? Contracts/ d? ? ? ? ?? Documents/ d? ? ? ? ?? Work/ The other machine still works

[Bug 1657592] Re: Cannot set hour and minute at same time

2017-01-18 Thread Redsandro
Update: It seems that minutes past the half hour are working. 12 23 * * 1-5 command # does not work 45 23 * * 1-5 command # works -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1657592 Title:

[Bug 1657592] [NEW] Cannot set hour and minute at same time

2017-01-18 Thread Redsandro
Public bug reported: I'm using Linux Mint 18 Sarah, which is based on Ubuntu 16.04 LTS, which uses the Ubuntu cron package version 3.0pl1-128ubuntu2. Expectation: --- 11 23 * * 1-5 command To run command from monday to friday on 11 past 23. Observation: --- Doesn't run. * 23

[Bug 1571262] Re: my computer's name is not "Bastien's computer"

2016-09-14 Thread Redsandro
I just saw my computer was "Bastien's computer" and I freaked out a bit. I thought I was hacked. Glad it's just a bug, albeit a funky one. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1571262

[Bug 814380] Re: tp_smapi_dkms works one boot only - until hardware reset

2016-04-26 Thread Redsandro
Ok, let me take my time machine back to 2010 and warn everybody. O-) (I apologize in advance for this remark.) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/814380 Title: tp_smapi_dkms works one

[Bug 1301383] Re: Ubuntu installer doesn't format swap partition when selecting encrypted drive and home

2014-10-27 Thread Redsandro
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 953875 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/953875 @starman if you have a working setup, could you show us the following files? * /etc/fstabtab * /etc/crypttab -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1310058] Re: ecryptfs-setup-swap hints after reboot

2014-10-27 Thread Redsandro
A note of warning: Without swap, you are used to your laptop suspending to RAM when closing the lid. @Wetware Random Number Generator (tnrng) wrote on 2014-10-10: #22 My final solution to this problem: This causes laptops to try to hibernate when you close the lid. Failing. Losing all

[Bug 1308783] Re: chromium-browser: java plugin does not work

2014-07-24 Thread Redsandro
IcedTea is an NPAPI plugin and is no longer supported by the latest Chromium builds. The Java library is called `libnpjp2.so`, and I am /guessing/ that libnp means this is also NPAPI. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NPAPI#Browser_support _Google Chrome / Chromium: In September 2013, Google

[Bug 1335093] [NEW] chromium-browser closes/crashes on Save image as...

2014-06-27 Thread Redsandro
Public bug reported: Chromium closes/crashes when you right-click on a http:// image served on a https:// page and choose Save image as... $ chromium-browser [18405:18436:0627/135735:FATAL:url_request.cc(707)] Trying to send secure referrer for insecure load Aborted $ uname -a Linux RedFenix

[Bug 1335093] Re: chromium-browser closes/crashes on Save image as...

2014-06-27 Thread Redsandro
Similarly https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=357473 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1335093 Title: chromium-browser closes/crashes on Save image as... To manage

[Bug 915368] Re: udevd: failed to execute '/lib/udev/mtp-probe'

2013-12-01 Thread Redsandro
I have this problem on Ubuntu 13.10 when I try do force a disk check by touching forcefsck on the drives. failed to execute '/lib/udev/mtp-probe' [numbers] -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1255815] [NEW] screenlock does not dpms off when screensaver is disabled

2013-11-27 Thread Redsandro
Public bug reported: Desktop Environments like OpenBox and LXDE (in Lubuntu and Debian LXDE) rely on xscreensaver-command -lock to lock the screen. When locking the screen, the screen should turn off (e.g. backlight off). But this only works if you have Blank Screen Only with a timeout selected

[Bug 871093] Re: Notify-OSD and sound-indicator contradict each other after unmute

2013-10-30 Thread Redsandro
Unfortunately I sold the Thinkpad Edge laptop. I cannot reproduce on my desktop but I don't know if it was an issue on this desktop back then. So this can either be closed, or wait for someone with Thinkpad Edge to verify. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 1019273] Re: Version Bump to 4.3

2013-10-14 Thread Redsandro
I heard the whole problem is that Eclipse 4.x requires Oracle Java 7. Ubuntu (and especially Debian) don't like Oracle, they are packaged with OpenJDK. I don't know the functional difference, I thought the whole idea was that they were compatible. Anyway, Oracle Java 7 is not in the default repos.

[Bug 1156580] Re: Ubuntu 13.04 installer crashes when installing in Virtual Machine

2013-09-29 Thread Redsandro
Same problem. Cannot install Ubuntu Xubuntu or Lubuntu i386 guest on VirtualBox 4.2.10 using Windows 8 host. I think they're all running Ubiquity 2.14.6. syslog http://pastebin.com/zu3GbC9Z I am guessing this is the relevant part: Sep 29 17:06:41 xubuntu kernel: [ 4908.488718]

[Bug 911622] Re: [12.04] GdkPixbuf-WARNING **: Cannot open pixbuf loader module file '/usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/gdk-pixbuf-2.0/2.10.0/loaders.cache': Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht gefunden (file not foun

2013-06-23 Thread Redsandro
Debian Testing, the same bug: Processing triggers for hicolor-icon-theme ... (gtk-update-icon-cache:22784): GdkPixbuf-WARNING **: Cannot open pixbuf loader module file '/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/gdk- pixbuf-2.0/2.10.0/loaders.cache': No such file or directory This likely means that your

[Bug 839188] Re: Tomboy sync should not freeze note window

2013-03-15 Thread Redsandro
Looks like I have been reporting stuff to the wrong tracker. Thanks for taking it upstream. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/839188 Title: Tomboy sync should not freeze note window To

[Bug 1152706] [NEW] Unable to restore trash if the containing directory is removed

2013-03-08 Thread Redsandro
Public bug reported: When you delete something, it goes into trash. .Trash-$UID/files/TrashedFile.ext .Trash-$UID/info/TrashedFile.ext.trashinfo The trashinfo contains the path relative to .Trash-$UID's parent directory that is the location to which the trashed file or directory should be

[Bug 1152706] Re: Unable to restore trash if the containing directory is removed

2013-03-08 Thread Redsandro
Correction: I don't know if 12.04 had that problem. I just remembered I had Lubuntu, and when I try pcmanfm now (just installed on 12.10), it does NOT have this trash problem. So work-around for restoring trash when parent-directories are also removed: Use PcManFM for handling the trash. -- You

[Bug 1152706] Re: Unable to restore trash if the containing directory is removed

2013-03-08 Thread Redsandro
Thanks for providing me with the correct bugtracker. Here's the link to the bugreport: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=695460 ** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #695460 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=695460 -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 571371] Re: Ubuntu One sync is ridiculously slow

2013-03-05 Thread Redsandro
+1 in 2013. I have synced 3MB in 3 hours. I put the same folder (1GB of files) in Dropbox, and it was done in half an hour (!). ** Changed in: ubuntuone-client (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1144703] [NEW] Seahorse does not show name or description of gvfs keys

2013-03-04 Thread Redsandro
Public bug reported: 1) Mount a (bunch of) LUKS encrypted 'devices' in Nautilus or Nemo. 2) In the password dialogs, choose to Remember the password forever 3) Open seahorse 4) All added keys are nameless and indistinguishable. 5) Show the properties of such a key, and notice how the description

[Bug 1144703] Re: Seahorse does not show name or description of gvfs keys

2013-03-04 Thread Redsandro
** Description changed: 1) Mount a (bunch of) LUKS encrypted 'devices' in Nautilus or Nemo. 2) In the password dialogs, choose to Remember the password forever 3) Open seahorse 4) All added keys are nameless and indistinguishable. 5) Show the properties of such a key, and notice how the

[Bug 1144781] [NEW] python-gnomekeyring cannot display technical properties of keys

2013-03-04 Thread Redsandro
Public bug reported: With python-gnomekeyring you can get the name and the secret of a key. But when you add LUKS passwords that are remembered forever in the gvfs- mount dialog for two or more identical harddrives (or other storage media I presume), there is a problem getting the secret

[Bug 1083644] Re: Palimpsest does not support gparted GPT

2013-02-21 Thread Redsandro
I changed it to confirmed for you. ** Changed in: gnome-disk-utility (Ubuntu) Status: Expired = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1083644 Title: Palimpsest does not

[Bug 1083644] Re: Palimpsest does not support gparted GPT

2013-02-21 Thread Redsandro
Please mention the version of the OS (and which distro) and packages involved when you get back to the relevant computer, because I did not have this problem in 12.10, however I DID have the problem in 12.04.1. Perhaps the problem got reintroduced with some update. -- You received this bug

[Bug 1094187] Re: ntfs-3g keeps crashing with SIGABRT in raise()

2013-02-04 Thread Redsandro
Thank you. Unfortunately these non-Ubuntu sources are too complicated to upgrade fuse. This used to work, (until Ubuntu decided to use a buggy version of fuse if you are right). This solution is not acceptable to users. There should be a .deb, a ppa, or a package in ubuntu-proposed. 12.10 is the

[Bug 1094187] Re: ntfs-3g keeps crashing with SIGABRT in raise()

2013-02-04 Thread Redsandro
The latest Ubuntu package contains fuse 2.9.0 while the latest upstream release is 2.9.2, am I wrong? Also in Mint, a kernel update is just a manual upgrade away, it's no problem, as long as it it in the Ubuntu repo. So with kernel 3.5.0-23-generic I practically have an up to date Ubuntu 12.10.

[Bug 580333] Re: tomboy notes disappeared

2013-02-04 Thread Redsandro
I have now something similar. When I sync my notes, al my 140 notes get removed. So I delete ~/.config/tomboy/manifest.xml I copy my note backups to ~/.local/share/tomboy I sync, and all 140 notes are uploaded to server (Ubuntu One). I sync a 2nd time, and all notes are removed locally again. I

[Bug 580333] Re: tomboy notes disappeared

2013-02-04 Thread Redsandro
Also I tried increasing the last-sync-date/, last-sync-rev/ and latest-revision values, but still same behavior. Is there a trick to nuke every trace of tomboy life and start over with my backup, without them getting removed? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 1083644] Re: Palimpsest does not support gparted GPT

2013-01-31 Thread Redsandro
You are right. Disk Utility in the current version (see below) from Linux Mint 12.10 does not have this problem. But maybe it has something to do with the policy of only allowing LUKS to be formatted with EXT4. That is the only option. After that's done, you have to select the unlocked EXT4

[Bug 1094187] Re: ntfs-3g keeps crashing with SIGABRT in raise()

2013-01-31 Thread Redsandro
So Jean-Pierre how do we update Fuse? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1094187 Title: ntfs-3g keeps crashing with SIGABRT in raise() To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1094187] Re: ntfs-3g keeps crashing with SIGABRT in raise()

2013-01-31 Thread Redsandro
And/or can you provide us with a link to the bug on the fuse bugtracker? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1094187 Title: ntfs-3g keeps crashing with SIGABRT in raise() To manage

[Bug 1094187] Re: ntfs-3g keeps crashing with SIGABRT in raise()

2013-01-24 Thread Redsandro
The version for the distro is current. https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fuse -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1094187 Title: ntfs-3g keeps crashing with SIGABRT in raise() To

[Bug 1094187] Re: ntfs-3g keeps crashing with SIGABRT in raise()

2013-01-24 Thread Redsandro
You might be correct, the default package for Ubuntu 12.10 and the likes (Mint) is indeed Version: 2.9.0-1ubuntu2. But there are no updates in the most modern of repos, which seems weird considering this bug is a show-stopper. Anyhow, looking for the nighly PPA or updates PPA or Team FUSE or

[Bug 1094187] [NEW] ntfs-3g keeps crashing with SIGABRT in raise()

2012-12-27 Thread Redsandro
Public bug reported: ntfs-3g crashed three times so far during a long and unattended sync of ecryptfs encrypted files. I am running Linux Mint 14 and it refuses to report this after I click 'report' on the reporter, so I thought I'd mention this manually. I never experienced a problem with

[Bug 741364] Re: libecryptfs_key_mod_openssl.so does not exist in ecryptfs-utils

2012-12-27 Thread Redsandro
I just noticed that the ecryptfs manual itself still mentions the optional key that was removed from the ecryptfs-utils manual: openssl_keyfile=(filename) The filename should be the filename of a file containing an RSA SSL key. -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 741364] Re: libecryptfs_key_mod_openssl.so does not exist in ecryptfs-utils

2012-12-13 Thread Redsandro
We're at 12.10 now. However, the module that should, according to the manual, be available at a minimum, still hasn't made it to the main release. Any comments about the stability and the chances of seeing this in this or the next release? -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 741364] Re: libecryptfs_key_mod_openssl.so does not exist in ecryptfs-utils

2012-12-13 Thread Redsandro
PS adding ppa:ecryptfs/ppa results in 404s, e.g.: W: Failed to fetch http://ppa.launchpad.net/ecryptfs/ppa/ubuntu/dists/quantal/main/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 741364] Re: libecryptfs_key_mod_openssl.so does not exist in ecryptfs-utils

2012-12-13 Thread Redsandro
Thanks for the reply. Which man page? I don't see that stated in any of the 12.10 man pages. Sorry, I played with this at home (12.10) but I am at an old version (at work) now. :P I just assumed the manual was the same as here. It's too bad there is little to no interest. Ecryptfs is really

[Bug 741364] Re: libecryptfs_key_mod_openssl.so does not exist in ecryptfs-utils

2012-12-13 Thread Redsandro
PS - I think ecryptfs-manager does exactly that - setting up passwordless mounting. But the 'kernel keyring' concept of ecryptfs- manager, as opposed to 'user keyring' scared me away of using it. I want to keep keys and secrets within my user, not something system-wide. But I guess terminology on

[Bug 1083644] Re: Palimpsest does not support gparted GPT

2012-11-29 Thread Redsandro
Might take some moments. It's not often that one can displace 4 Terabytes of data to perform tests on a drive. Are you positive you tried this on a drive of minimal 3.3 Terabytes in size? I believe that is the hard limit for MBR based partition tables. -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 1083644] Re: Palimpsest does not support gparted GPT

2012-11-29 Thread Redsandro
PS What is the current version of this package? I have no updates in the manager. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1083644 Title: Palimpsest does not support gparted GPT To manage

[Bug 1083644] [NEW] Palimpsest does not support gparted GPT

2012-11-27 Thread Redsandro
Public bug reported: The Disk Utility cannot edit partitions (create, delete, LUKS) on GPT- based drives with a size bigger than MBR-based drives would support. I have a 4TB WD My Book 1140.1016 that requires a GPT partition table because it's 4GB, beyond MBR (MSDOS) limits. When I create a GPT

[Bug 1083644] Re: Palimpsest does not support gparted GPT

2012-11-27 Thread Redsandro
Just noticed: When you remove all partitions in gparted, the partition table is still GPT. But according to Disk Utility, there is no partition table. Looks like GPT is not recognized even though there is mention of having GPT knowledge in the above error message. -- You received this bug

[Bug 1070207] Re: Trackpoint doesn't work on Thinkpad L530

2012-11-22 Thread Redsandro
I have a similar problem with the brand new Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Carbon laptop. Trackpoint works in Ubuntu 12.04. In 12.10, it does not. (?) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1070207 Title:

[Bug 873058] Re: Jockey fails to install binary ati driver (post release) version

2012-09-08 Thread Redsandro
After choosing the proposed repo in synaptic and refreshing, there was no update for jockey (or nvidia-common, if that's still relevant for amd). Unable to verify. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 873058] Re: Jockey fails to install binary ati driver (post release) version

2012-09-08 Thread Redsandro
@Brian My mistake, you are talking about oneiric-proposed and I am running precise lts. I conveniently assumed you were talking about precise. Anyway, doesn't it make more sense to have a fix in precise-proposed since everyone is and will be running lts while 11.10 is kinda old news? Precise

[Bug 873058] Re: Jockey fails to install binary ati driver (post release) version

2012-09-08 Thread Redsandro
FYI, although status 'Fix Released', the bug remains. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/873058 Title: Jockey fails to install binary ati driver (post release) version To manage

[Bug 873058] Re: Jockey fails to install binary ati driver (post release) version

2012-09-08 Thread Redsandro
Note on comment #84 attachment: Please ignore until DEBUG: dpkg: error: dpkg status database is locked by another process I closed synaptic and ran the update again. Refer to 2nd part of the log. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 873058] Re: Jockey fails to install binary ati driver (post release) version

2012-09-06 Thread Redsandro
The link is not very straightforward. How do we test this without getting every proposed update? 1) enable proposed in synaptic 2) update jockey 3) restricted drivers - install post-release updates one 4) disable proposed in synaptic Is this correct? -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 1028518] Re: Fn keys such as brightness and volume stopped working after update

2012-09-04 Thread Redsandro
I don't know by which update, but the bug is partially fixed. SOUND The sound hotkeys work normally again. BRIGHTNESS Buggy. The hotkeys work again, but there are now 7 steps, and the indicator goes (from min to max) like this: min, middle, max, min, middle, max. When it worked fine (before

[Bug 1028518] Re: Fn keys such as brightness and volume stopped working after update

2012-09-04 Thread Redsandro
** Description changed: + -UPDATE- September 4 - Recent updates reintroduced functional Fn-Keys, + but the Brightness Fn-keys are behaving poorly, compared to before when + they behaved perfectly. + + See comment #13 + + Original report: + + I have a Lenovo

[Bug 1028518] Re: Fn keys such as brightness and volume stopped working after update

2012-08-06 Thread Redsandro
@rCX: I cannot test your hypothesis, because I do not have Windows installed at the moment. However, two notes: 1) This is a brand new Edge from september 2011 (Intel), which is different from the ones made pre-2011 (AMD) which are mentioned in topics with similar problems. 2) Hotkeys have

[Bug 1028518] Re: Fn keys such as brightness and volume stopped working after update

2012-08-06 Thread Redsandro
Also, I try to troubleshoot according to this guide: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Hotkeys/Troubleshooting to narrow the problem down, but everytime I kill gnome-settings-daemon it just restarts itself. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 1028518] Re: Fn keys such as brightness and volume stopped working after update

2012-07-26 Thread Redsandro
I wish I could change gnome-settings-daemon back into ubuntu for package, because peer pressure from the Bug Bot made me choose something that I am not sure about. The truth is, when you see something not happening, it's hard to know what causes it. -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 1028518] Re: Fn keys such as brightness and volume stopped working after update

2012-07-24 Thread Redsandro
# lspci -vnn | grep -A10 VGA 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Intel Corporation Core Processor Integrated Graphics Controller [8086:0046] (rev 02) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller]) Subsystem: Lenovo Device [17aa:215a] Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 42

[Bug 1028518] [NEW] Fn keys such as brightness and volume stopped working after update

2012-07-24 Thread Redsandro
Public bug reported: I have a Lenovo Thinkpad Edge 15, happily running Ubuntu 12.04 + Cinnamon. Today after updating, certain Fn Function Keys didn't work anymore, like brightness, volume and mute. Other Fn keys like Play Pause Next, they still work. Tried rebooting some more. Google and

[Bug 1028518] Re: Fn keys such as brightness and volume stopped working after update

2012-07-24 Thread Redsandro
For reference purposes, here's how to set that brightness in case of emergencies without the Fn keys: Set the value of: /sys/class/backlight/acpi_video0/brightness to a value between 1 and max, where max is: /sys/class/backlight/acpi_video0/max_brightness Note that you can't just sudo echo it in

[Bug 1028518] Re: Fn keys such as brightness and volume stopped working after update

2012-07-24 Thread Redsandro
The Brightness and Lock dialog also still works fine. (I didn't even know that dialog existed) You can find it in System Settings. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1028518 Title: Fn

[Bug 1028518] Re: Fn keys such as brightness and volume stopped working after update

2012-07-24 Thread Redsandro
gnome-settings-daemon, gnome-control-center? Not sure. ** Package changed: ubuntu = gnome-settings-daemon (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1028518 Title: Fn keys such as

  1   2   >